Search

Advancements in genome assembly and sequencing technology have made whole genome sequence (WGS) data and reference genomes accessible to study polyploid species. Compared to popular reduced-representation sequencing approaches, the genome-wide coverage and greater marker density provided by WGS data can greatly improve our understanding of polyploid species and polyploid biology. However, biological features that make polyploid species interesting also pose challenges in read mapping, variant identification, and genotype estimation. Accounting for characteristics in variant calling like allelic dosage uncertainty, homology between subgenomes, and variance in chromosome inheritance mode can reduce errors. Here, I discuss the challenges of variant calling in polyploid WGS data and discuss where potential solutions can be integrated into a standard variant calling pipeline.

Background: Circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) is a subset of cell free DNA (cfDNA) released by tumour cells into the bloodstream. Circulating tumour DNA has shown great potential as a biomarker to inform treatment in cancer patients. Collecting ctDNA is minimally invasive and reflects the entire genetic makeup of a patient's cancer. ctDNA variants in NGS data can be difficult to distinguish from sequencing and PCR artefacts due to low abundance, particularly in the early stages of cancer. Unique Molecular Identifiers (UMIs) are short sequences ligated to the sequencing library before amplification. These sequences are useful for filtering out low frequency artefacts. The utility of ctDNA as a cancer biomarker depends on accurate detection of cancer variants. Results: In this study, we benchmarked six variant calling tools, including two UMI-aware callers for their ability to call ctDNA variants. The standard variant callers tested included Mutect2, bcftools, LoFreq and FreeBayes. The UMI-aware variant callers benchmarked were UMI-VarCal and UMIErrorCorrect. We used both datasets with known variants spiked in at low frequencies, and datasets containing ctDNA, and generated synthetic UMI sequences for these datasets. Variant callers displayed different preferences for sensitivity and specificity. Mutect2 showed high sensitivity, while returning more privately called variants than any other caller in data without synthetic UMIs – an indicator of false positive variant discovery. In data encoded with synthetic UMIs, UMI-VarCal detected fewer putative false positive variants than all other callers in synthetic datasets. Mutect2 showed a balance between high sensitivity and specificity in data encoded with synthetic UMIs. Conclusions: Our results indicate UMI-aware variant callers have potential to improve sensitivity and specificity in calling low frequency ctDNA variants over standard variant calling tools. There is a growing need for further development of UMI-aware variant calling tools if effective early detection methods for cancer using ctDNA samples are to be realised. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Therapeutic cancer vaccines have been considered in recent decades as important immunotherapeutic strategies capable of leading to tumor regression. In the development of these vaccines, the identification of neoepitopes plays a critical role, and different computational methods have been proposed and employed to direct and accelerate this process. In this context, this review identified and systematically analyzed the most recent studies published in the literature on the computational prediction of epitopes for the development of therapeutic vaccines, outlining critical steps, along with the associated program's strengths and limitations. A scoping review was conducted following the PRISMA extension (PRISMA-ScR). Searches were performed in databases (Scopus, PubMed, Web of Science, Science Direct) using the keywords: neoepitope, epitope, vaccine, prediction, algorithm, cancer, and tumor. Forty-nine articles published from 2012 to 2024 were synthesized and analyzed. Most of the identified studies focus on the prediction of epitopes with an affinity for MHC I molecules in solid tumors, such as lung carcinoma. Predicting epitopes with class II MHC affinity has been relatively underexplored. Besides neoepitope prediction from high-throughput sequencing data, additional steps were identified, such as the prioritization of neoepitopes and validation. Mutect2 is the most used tool for variant calling, while NetMHCpan is favored for neoepitope prediction. Artificial/convolutional neural networks are the preferred methods for neoepitope prediction. For prioritizing immunogenic epitopes, the random forest algorithm is the most used for classification. The performance values related to the computational models for the prediction and prioritization of neoepitopes are high; however, a large part of the studies still use microbiome databases for training. The in vitro/in vivo validations of the predicted neoepitopes were verified in 55% of the analyzed studies. Clinical trials that led to successful tumor remission were identified, highlighting that this immunotherapeutic approach can benefit these patients. Integrating high-throughput sequencing, sophisticated bioinformatics tools, and rigorous validation methods through in vitro/in vivo assays as well as clinical trials, the tumor neoepitope-based vaccine approach holds promise for developing personalized therapeutic vaccines that target specific tumor cancers. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Structural Variants (SVs) are a type of variation that can significantly influence phenotypes and cause diseases. Thus, the accurate detection of SVs is a vital part of modern genetic analysis. The advent of long-read sequencing technology ushers in a new era of more accurate and comprehensive SV calling, and many tools have been developed to call SVs using long-read data. Haplotype-tagging is a procedure that can tag haplotype information on reads and can thus potentially improve the SV detection; nevertheless, few methods make use of this information. In this article, we introduce HapKled, a new SV detection tool that can accurately detect SVs from Oxford Nanopore Technologies (ONT) long-read alignment data. Methods: HapKled utilizes haplotype information underlying alignment data by conducting haplotype-tagging using Whatshap on the reads to improve the detection performance, with three unique calling mechanics including altering clustering conditions according to haplotype information of signatures, determination of similar SVs based on haplotype information, and slack filtering conditions based on haplotype quality. Results: In our evaluations, HapKled outperformed state-of-the-art tools and can deliver better SV detection results on both simulated and real sequencing data. The code and experiments of HapKled can be obtained from https://github.com/CoREse/HapKled. Discussion: With the superb SV detection performance that HapKled can deliver, HapKled could be useful in bioinformatics research, clinical diagnosis, and medical research and development. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Genome sequencing data have become increasingly important in the field of personalized medicine and diagnosis. However, accurately detecting genomic variations remains a challenging task. Traditional variation detection methods rely on manual inspection or predefined rules, which can be time-consuming and prone to errors. Consequently, deep learning–based approaches for variation detection have gained attention due to their ability to automatically learn genomic features that distinguish between variants. In our review, we discuss the recent advancements in deep learning–based algorithms for detecting small variations and structural variations in genomic data, as well as their advantages and limitations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Background Circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) is a subset of cell free DNA (cfDNA) released by tumour cells into the bloodstream. Circulating tumour DNA has shown great potential as a biomarker to inform treatment in cancer patients. Collecting ctDNA is minimally invasive and reflects the entire genetic makeup of a patient’s cancer. ctDNA variants in NGS data can be difficult to distinguish from sequencing and PCR artefacts due to low abundance, particularly in the early stages of cancer. Unique Molecular Identifiers (UMIs) are short sequences ligated to the sequencing library before amplification. These sequences are useful for filtering out low frequency artefacts. The utility of ctDNA as a cancer biomarker depends on accurate detection of cancer variants. Results In this study, we benchmarked six variant calling tools, including two UMI-aware callers for their ability to call ctDNA variants. The standard variant callers tested included Mutect2, bcftools, LoFreq and FreeBayes. The UMI-aware variant callers benchmarked were UMI-VarCal and UMIErrorCorrect. We used both datasets with known variants spiked in at low frequencies, and datasets containing ctDNA, and generated synthetic UMI sequences for these datasets. Variant callers displayed different preferences for sensitivity and specificity. Mutect2 showed high sensitivity, while returning more privately called variants than any other caller in data without synthetic UMIs – an indicator of false positive variant discovery. In data encoded with synthetic UMIs, UMI-VarCal detected fewer putative false positive variants than all other callers in synthetic datasets. Mutect2 showed a balance between high sensitivity and specificity in data encoded with synthetic UMIs. Conclusions Our results indicate UMI-aware variant callers have potential to improve sensitivity and specificity in calling low frequency ctDNA variants over standard variant calling tools. There is a growing need for further development of UMI-aware variant calling tools if effective early detection methods for cancer using ctDNA samples are to be realised.

Abstract Background At a global scale, the SARS-CoV-2 virus did not remain in its initial genotype for a long period of time, with the first global reports of variants of concern (VOCs) in late 2020. Subsequently, genome sequencing has become an indispensable tool for characterizing the ongoing pandemic, particularly for typing SARS-CoV-2 samples obtained from patients or environmental surveillance. For such SARS-CoV-2 typing, various in vitro and in silico workflows exist, yet to date, no systematic cross-platform validation has been reported. Results In this work, we present the first comprehensive cross-platform evaluation and validation of in silico SARS-CoV-2 typing workflows. The evaluation relies on a dataset of 54 patient-derived samples sequenced with several different in vitro approaches on all relevant state-of-the-art sequencing platforms. Moreover, we present UnCoVar, a robust, production-grade reproducible SARS-CoV-2 typing workflow that outperforms all other tested approaches in terms of precision and recall. Conclusions In many ways, the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has accelerated the development of techniques and analytical approaches. We believe that this can serve as a blueprint for dealing with future pandemics. Accordingly, UnCoVar is easily generalizable towards other viral pathogens and future pandemics. The fully automated workflow assembles virus genomes from patient samples, identifies existing lineages, and provides high-resolution insights into individual mutations. UnCoVar includes extensive quality control and automatically generates interactive visual reports. UnCoVar is implemented as a Snakemake workflow. The open-source code is available under a BSD 2-clause license at github.com/IKIM-Essen/uncovar.

We present the results of the human genomic small variant calling benchmarking initiative of the German Research Foundation (DFG) funded Next Generation Sequencing Competence Network (NGS-CN) and the German Human Genome-Phenome Archive (GHGA). In this effort, we developed NCBench, a continuous benchmarking platform for the evaluation of small genomic variant callsets in terms of recall, precision, and false positive/negative error patterns. NCBench is implemented as a continuously re-evaluated open-source repository. We show that it is possible to entirely rely on public free infrastructure (Github, Github Actions, Zenodo) in combination with established open-source tools. NCBench is agnostic of the used dataset and can evaluate an arbitrary number of given callsets, while reporting the results in a visual and interactive way. We used NCBench to evaluate over 40 callsets generated by various variant calling pipelines available in the participating groups that were run on three exome datasets from different enrichment kits and at different coverages. While all pipelines achieve high overall quality, subtle systematic differences between callers and datasets exist and are made apparent by NCBench.These insights are useful to improve existing pipelines and develop new workflows. NCBench is meant to be open for the contribution of any given callset. Most importantly, for authors, it will enable the omission of repeated re-implementation of paper-specific variant calling benchmarks for the publication of new tools or pipelines, while readers will benefit from being able to (continuously) observe the performance of tools and pipelines at the time of reading instead of at the time of writing.

Background: At a global scale, the SARS-CoV-2 virus did not remain in its initial genotype for a long period of time, with the first global reports of variants of concern (VOCs) in late 2020. Subsequently, genome sequencing has become an indispensable tool for characterizing the ongoing pandemic, particularly for typing SARS-CoV-2 samples obtained from patients or environmental surveillance. For such SARS-CoV-2 typing, various in vitro and in silico workflows exist, yet to date, no systematic cross-platform validation has been reported. Results: In this work, we present the first comprehensive cross-platform evaluation and validation of in silico SARS-CoV-2 typing workflows. The evaluation relies on a dataset of 54 patient-derived samples sequenced with several different in vitro approaches on all relevant state-of-the-art sequencing platforms. Moreover, we present UnCoVar, a robust, production-grade reproducible SARS-CoV-2 typing workflow that outperforms all other tested approaches in terms of precision and recall. Conclusions: In many ways, the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has accelerated the development of techniques and analytical approaches. We believe that this can serve as a blueprint for dealing with future pandemics. Accordingly, UnCoVar is easily generalizable towards other viral pathogens and future pandemics. The fully automated workflow assembles virus genomes from patient samples, identifies existing lineages, and provides high-resolution insights into individual mutations. UnCoVar includes extensive quality control and automatically generates interactive visual reports. UnCoVar is implemented as a Snakemake workflow. The open-source code is available under a BSD 2-clause license at github.com/IKIM-Essen/uncovar. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The integration of target capture systems with next-generation sequencing has emerged as an efficient tool for exploring specific genetic regions with a high resolution and facilitating the rapid discovery of novel alleles. Despite these advancements, the application of targeted sequencing methodologies, such as the myBaits technology, in polyploid oat species remains relatively unexplored. In this study, we utilized the myBaits target capture method offered by Daicel Arbor Biosciences to detect variants and assess their reliability for variant detection in oat genomics and breeding. Ten oat genotypes were carefully chosen for targeted sequencing, focusing on specific regions on chromosome 2A to detect variants. The selected region harbors 98 genes. Precisely designed baits targeting the genes within these regions were employed for the target capture sequencing. We employed various mappers and variant callers to identify variants. After the identification of variants, we focused on the variants identified via all variants callers to assess the applicability of the myBaits sequencing methodology in oat breeding. In our efforts to validate the identified variants, we focused on two SNPs, one deletion and one insertion identified via all variant callers in the genotypes KF-318 and NOS 819111-70 but absent in the remaining eight genotypes. The Sanger sequencing of targeted SNPs failed to reproduce target capture data obtained through the myBaits technology. Similarly, the validation of deletion and insertion variants via high-resolution melting (HRM) curve analysis also failed to reproduce target capture data, again suggesting limitations in the reliability of the myBaits target capture sequencing using short-read sequencing for variant detection in the oat genome. This study shed light on the importance of exercising caution when employing the myBaits target capture strategy for variant detection in oats. This study provides valuable insights for breeders seeking to advance oat breeding efforts and marker development using myBaits target capture sequencing, emphasizing the significance of methodological sequencing considerations in oat genomics research. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In cancer genomics, variant calling has advanced, but traditional mean accuracy evaluations are inadequate for biomarkers like tumor mutation burden, which vary significantly across samples, affecting immunotherapy patient selection and threshold settings. In this study, we introduce TMBstable, an innovative method that dynamically selects optimal variant calling strategies for specific genomic regions using a meta-learning framework, distinguishing it from traditional callers with uniform sample-wide strategies. The process begins with segmenting the sample into windows and extracting meta-features for clustering, followed by using a pre-trained meta-model to select suitable algorithms for each cluster, thereby addressing strategy-sample mismatches, reducing performance fluctuations and ensuring consistent performance across various samples. We evaluated TMBstable using both simulated and real non-small cell lung cancer and nasopharyngeal carcinoma samples, comparing it with advanced callers. The assessment, focusing on stability measures, such as the variance and coefficient of variation in false positive rate, false negative rate, precision and recall, involved 300 simulated and 106 real tumor samples. Benchmark results showed TMBstable's superior stability with the lowest variance and coefficient of variation across performance metrics, highlighting its effectiveness in analyzing the counting-based biomarker. The TMBstable algorithm can be accessed at https://github.com/hello-json/TMBstable for academic usage only. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Advancements in genome assembly and sequencing technology have made whole genome sequence (WGS) data and reference genomes accessible to study polyploid species. Compared to popular reduced‐representation sequencing approaches, the genome‐wide coverage and greater marker density provided by WGS data can greatly improve our understanding of polyploid species and polyploid biology. However, biological features that make polyploid species interesting also pose challenges in read mapping, variant identification, and genotype estimation. Accounting for characteristics in variant calling like allelic dosage uncertainty, homology between subgenomes, and variance in chromosome inheritance mode can reduce errors. Here, I discuss the challenges of variant calling in polyploid WGS data and discuss where potential solutions can be integrated into a standard variant calling pipeline.

Abstract Mounting evidence recognizes structural variations (SVs) and repetitive DNA sequences as crucial players in shaping the existing grape phenotypic diversity at intra- and inter-species levels. To deepen our understanding on the abundance, diversity, and distribution of SVs and repetitive DNAs, including transposable elements (TEs) and tandemly repeated satellite DNA (satDNAs), we re-sequenced the genomes of the ancient grapes Aglianico and Falanghina. The analysis of large copy number variants (CNVs) detected candidate polymorphic genes that are involved in the enological features of these varieties. In a comparative analysis of Aglianico and Falanghina sequences with 21 publicly available genomes of cultivated grapes, we provided a genome-wide annotation of grape TEs at the lineage level. We disclosed that at least two main clusters of grape cultivars could be identified based on the TEs content. Multiple TEs families appeared either significantly enriched or depleted. In addition, in silico and cytological analyses provided evidence for a diverse chromosomal distribution of several satellite repeats between Aglianico, Falanghina, and other grapes. Overall, our data further improved our understanding of the intricate grape diversity held by two Italian traditional varieties, unveiling a pool of unique candidate genes never so far exploited in breeding for improved fruit quality.

Background Next generation sequencing (NGS) has become a standard tool in the molecular diagnostics of Mendelian disease, and the precision of such diagnostics is greatly affected by the accuracy of variant calling from sequencing data. Recently, we have comprehensively evaluated the performance of multiple variant calling pipelines. However, no systematic analysis of the effects of read trimming on variant discovery with modern variant calling software has yet been performed. Methods In this work, we systematically evaluated the effects of adapters on the performance of 8 variant calling and filtering methods using 14 standard reference Genome-in-a-Bottle (GIAB) samples. Variant calls were compared to the ground truth variant sets, and the effect of adapter trimming with different tools was assessed using major performance metrics (precision, recall, and F1 score). Results We show that adapter trimming has no effect on the accuracy of the best-performing variant callers (e.g., DeepVariant) on whole-genome sequencing (WGS) data. For whole-exome sequencing (WES) datasets subtle improvement of accuracy was observed in some of the samples. In high-coverage WES data (~200x mean coverage), adapter removal allowed for discovery of 2-4 additional true positive variants in only two out of seven datasets tested. Moreover, this effect was not dependent on the median insert size and proportion of adapter sequences in reads. Surprisingly, the effect of trimming on variant calling was reversed when moderate coverage (~80-100x) WES data was used. Finally, we show that some of the recently developed machine learning-based variant callers demonstrate greater dependence on the presence of adapters in reads. Conclusions Taken together, our results indicate that adapter removal is unnecessary when calling germline variants, but suggest that preprocessing methods should be carefully chosen when developing and using machine learning-based variant analysis methods.

Structural Variants (SVs) are a crucial type of genetic variant that can significantly impact phenotypes. Therefore, the identification of SVs is an essential part of modern genomic analysis. In this article, we present kled, an ultra-fast and sensitive SV caller for long-read sequencing data given the specially designed approach with a novel signature-merging algorithm, custom refinement strategies and a high-performance program structure. The evaluation results demonstrate that kled can achieve optimal SV calling compared to several state-of-the-art methods on simulated and real long-read data for different platforms and sequencing depths. Furthermore, kled excels at rapid SV calling and can efficiently utilize multiple Central Processing Unit (CPU) cores while maintaining low memory usage. The source code for kled can be obtained from https://github.com/CoREse/kled. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Next-generation sequencing (NGS) has revolutionized the field of rare disease diagnostics. Whole exome and whole genome sequencing are now routinely used for diagnostic purposes; however, the overall diagnosis rate remains lower than expected. In this work, we review current approaches used for calling and interpretation of germline genetic variants in the human genome, and discuss the most important challenges that persist in the bioinformatic analysis of NGS data in medical genetics. We describe and attempt to quantitatively assess the remaining problems, such as the quality of the reference genome sequence, reproducible coverage biases, or variant calling accuracy in complex regions of the genome. We also discuss the prospects of switching to the complete human genome assembly or the human pan-genome and important caveats associated with such a switch. We touch on arguably the hardest problem of NGS data analysis for medical genomics, namely, the annotation of genetic variants and their subsequent interpretation. We highlight the most challenging aspects of annotation and prioritization of both coding and non-coding variants. Finally, we demonstrate the persistent prevalence of pathogenic variants in the coding genome, and outline research directions that may enhance the efficiency of NGS-based disease diagnostics. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Genomic sequencing of clinical samples to identify emerging variants of SARS-CoV-2 has been a key public health tool for curbing the spread of the virus. As a result, an unprecedented number of SARS-CoV-2 genomes were sequenced during the COVID-19 pandemic, which allowed for rapid identification of genetic variants, enabling the timely design and testing of therapies and deployment of new vaccine formulations to combat the new variants. However, despite the technological advances of deep sequencing, the analysis of the raw sequence data generated globally is neither standardized nor consistent, leading to vastly disparate sequences that may impact identification of variants. Here, we show that for both Illumina and Oxford Nanopore sequencing platforms, downstream bioinformatic protocols used by industry, government, and academic groups resulted in different virus sequences from same sample. These bioinformatic workflows produced consensus genomes with differences in single nucleotide polymorphisms, inclusion and exclusion of insertions, and/or deletions, despite using the same raw sequence as input datasets. Here, we compared and characterized such discrepancies and propose a specific suite of parameters and protocols that should be adopted across the field. Consistent results from bioinformatic workflows are fundamental to SARS-CoV-2 and future pathogen surveillance efforts, including pandemic preparation, to allow for a data-driven and timely public health response. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Mounting evidence recognizes structural variations (SVs) and repetitive DNA sequences as crucial players in shaping the existing grape phenotypic diversity at intra- and inter-species levels. To deepen our understanding on the abundance, diversity, and distribution of SVs and repetitive DNAs, including transposable elements (TEs) and tandemly repeated satellite DNA (satDNAs), we re-sequenced the genomes of the ancient grapes Aglianico and Falanghina. The analysis of large copy number variants (CNVs) detected candidate polymorphic genes that are involved in the enological features of these varieties. In a comparative analysis of Aglianico and Falanghina sequences with 21 publicly available genomes of cultivated grapes, we provided a genome-wide annotation of grape TEs at the lineage level. We disclosed that at least two main clusters of grape cultivars could be identified based on the TEs content. Multiple TEs families appeared either significantly enriched or depleted. In addition, in silico and cytological analyses provided evidence for a diverse chromosomal distribution of several satellite repeats between Aglianico, Falanghina, and other grapes. Overall, our data further improved our understanding of the intricate grape diversity held by two Italian traditional varieties, unveiling a pool of unique candidate genes never so far exploited in breeding for improved fruit quality. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Advances in whole-genome sequencing (WGS) promise to enable the accurate and comprehensive structural variant (SV) discovery. Dissecting SVs from WGS data presents a substantial number of challenges and a plethora of SV detection methods have been developed. Currently, evidence that investigators can use to select appropriate SV detection tools is lacking. In this article, we have evaluated the performance of SV detection tools on mouse and human WGS data using a comprehensive polymerase chain reaction-confirmed gold standard set of SVs and the genome-in-a-bottle variant set, respectively. In contrast to the previous benchmarking studies, our gold standard dataset included a complete set of SVs allowing us to report both precision and sensitivity rates of the SV detection methods. Our study investigates the ability of the methods to detect deletions, thus providing an optimistic estimate of SV detection performance as the SV detection methods that fail to detect deletions are likely to miss more complex SVs. We found that SV detection tools varied widely in their performance, with several methods providing a good balance between sensitivity and precision. Additionally, we have determined the SV callers best suited for low- and ultralow-pass sequencing data as well as for different deletion length categories.

Abstract Background The accurate detection of variants is essential for genomics-based studies. Currently, there are various tools designed to detect genomic variants, however, it has always been a challenge to decide which tool to use, especially when various major genome projects have chosen to use different tools. Thus far, most of the existing tools were mainly developed to work on short-read data (i.e., Illumina); however, other sequencing technologies (e.g. PacBio, and Oxford Nanopore) have recently shown that they can also be used for variant calling. In addition, with the emergence of artificial intelligence (AI)-based variant calling tools, there is a pressing need to compare these tools in terms of efficiency, accuracy, computational power, and ease of use. Results In this study, we evaluated five of the most widely used conventional and AI-based variant calling tools (BCFTools, GATK4, Platypus, DNAscope, and DeepVariant) in terms of accuracy and computational cost using both short-read and long-read data derived from three different sequencing technologies (Illumina, PacBio HiFi, and ONT) for the same set of samples from the Genome In A Bottle project. The analysis showed that AI-based variant calling tools supersede conventional ones for calling SNVs and INDELs using both long and short reads in most aspects. In addition, we demonstrate the advantages and drawbacks of each tool while ranking them in each aspect of these comparisons. Conclusion This study provides best practices for variant calling using AI-based and conventional variant callers with different types of sequencing data.

Therapeutic cancer vaccines have been considered in recent decades as important immunotherapeutic strategies capable of leading to tumor regression. In the development of these vaccines, the identification of neoepitopes plays a critical role, and different computational methods have been proposed and employed to direct and accelerate this process. In this context, this review identified and systematically analyzed the most recent studies published in the literature on the computational prediction of epitopes for the development of therapeutic vaccines, outlining critical steps, along with the associated program’s strengths and limitations. A scoping review was conducted following the PRISMA extension (PRISMA-ScR). Searches were performed in databases (Scopus, PubMed, Web of Science, Science Direct) using the keywords: neoepitope, epitope, vaccine, prediction, algorithm, cancer, and tumor. Forty-nine articles published from 2012 to 2024 were synthesized and analyzed. Most of the identified studies focus on the prediction of epitopes with an affinity for MHC I molecules in solid tumors, such as lung carcinoma. Predicting epitopes with class II MHC affinity has been relatively underexplored. Besides neoepitope prediction from high-throughput sequencing data, additional steps were identified, such as the prioritization of neoepitopes and validation. Mutect2 is the most used tool for variant calling, while NetMHCpan is favored for neoepitope prediction. Artificial/convolutional neural networks are the preferred methods for neoepitope prediction. For prioritizing immunogenic epitopes, the random forest algorithm is the most used for classification. The performance values related to the computational models for the prediction and prioritization of neoepitopes are high; however, a large part of the studies still use microbiome databases for training. The in vitro/in vivo validations of the predicted neoepitopes were verified in 55% of the analyzed studies. Clinical trials that led to successful tumor remission were identified, highlighting that this immunotherapeutic approach can benefit these patients. Integrating high-throughput sequencing, sophisticated bioinformatics tools, and rigorous validation methods through in vitro/in vivo assays as well as clinical trials, the tumor neoepitope-based vaccine approach holds promise for developing personalized therapeutic vaccines that target specific tumor cancers.

Exome sequencing (ES) is a recommended first-tier diagnostic test for many rare monogenic diseases. It allows for the detection of both single-nucleotide variants (SNVs) and copy number variants (CNVs) in coding exonic regions of the genome in a single test, and this dual analysis is a valuable approach, especially in limited resource settings. Single-nucleotide variants are well studied; however, the incorporation of copy number variant analysis tools into variant calling pipelines has not been implemented yet as a routine diagnostic test, and chromosomal microarray is still more widely used to detect copy number variants. Research shows that combined single and copy number variant analysis can lead to a diagnostic yield of up to 58%, increasing the yield with as much as 18% from the single-nucleotide variant only pipeline. Importantly, this is achieved with the consideration of computational costs only, without incurring any additional sequencing costs. This mini review provides an overview of copy number variant analysis from exome data and what the current recommendations are for this type of analysis. We also present an overview on rare monogenic disease research standard practices in resource-limited settings. We present evidence that integrating copy number variant detection tools into a standard exome sequencing analysis pipeline improves diagnostic yield and should be considered a significantly beneficial addition, with relatively low-cost implications. Routine implementation in underrepresented populations and limited resource settings will promote generation and sharing of CNV datasets and provide momentum to build core centers for this niche within genomic medicine. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The accurate detection of variants is essential for genomics-based studies. Currently, there are various tools designed to detect genomic variants, however, it has always been a challenge to decide which tool to use, especially when various major genome projects have chosen to use different tools. Thus far, most of the existing tools were mainly developed to work on short-read data (i.e., Illumina); however, other sequencing technologies (e.g. PacBio, and Oxford Nanopore) have recently shown that they can also be used for variant calling. In addition, with the emergence of artificial intelligence (AI)-based variant calling tools, there is a pressing need to compare these tools in terms of efficiency, accuracy, computational power, and ease of use. Results: In this study, we evaluated five of the most widely used conventional and AI-based variant calling tools (BCFTools, GATK4, Platypus, DNAscope, and DeepVariant) in terms of accuracy and computational cost using both short-read and long-read data derived from three different sequencing technologies (Illumina, PacBio HiFi, and ONT) for the same set of samples from the Genome In A Bottle project. The analysis showed that AI-based variant calling tools supersede conventional ones for calling SNVs and INDELs using both long and short reads in most aspects. In addition, we demonstrate the advantages and drawbacks of each tool while ranking them in each aspect of these comparisons. Conclusion: This study provides best practices for variant calling using AI-based and conventional variant callers with different types of sequencing data. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

DNA sample contamination is a major issue in clinical and research applications of whole-genome and -exome sequencing. Even modest levels of contamination can substantially affect the overall quality of variant calls and lead to widespread genotyping errors. Currently, popular tools for estimating the contamination level use short-read data (BAM/CRAM files), which are expensive to store and manipulate and often not retained or shared widely. We propose a metric to estimate DNA sample contamination from variant-level whole-genome and -exome sequence data called CHARR, contamination from homozygous alternate reference reads, which leverages the infiltration of reference reads within homozygous alternate variant calls. CHARR uses a small proportion of variant-level genotype information and thus can be computed from single-sample gVCFs or callsets in VCF or BCF formats, as well as efficiently stored variant calls in Hail VariantDataset format. Our results demonstrate that CHARR accurately recapitulates results from existing tools with substantially reduced costs, improving the accuracy and efficiency of downstream analyses of ultra-large whole-genome and exome sequencing datasets. [Display omitted] Lu et al. develop CHARR, a method for estimating DNA sample contamination from variant call data, which leverages the infiltration of reference reads within homozygous alternate variant calls. CHARR accurately recapitulates results from existing tools with substantially reduced cost and increased efficiency, which facilitates downstream analyses of ultra-large genomic data. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Processing raw genomic data for downstream applications such as imputation, association studies, and modeling requires numerous third-party bioinformatics software tools. It is highly time-consuming and resource-intensive with computational demands and storage limitations that pose significant challenges that increase cost. The use of software tools independent of one another, in a disjointed stepwise fashion, increases the difficulty and sets forth higher error rates because of fragmented job executions in alignment, variant calling, and/or build conversion complications. As sequencing data availability grows, the ability for biologists to process it using stable, automated, and reproducible workflows is paramount as it significantly reduces the time to generate clean and reliable data. Results: The Iliad suite of genomic data workflows was developed to provide users with seamless file transitions from raw genomic data to a quality-controlled variant call format (VCF) file for downstream applications. Iliad benefits from the efficiency of the Snakemake best practices framework coupled with Singularity and Docker containers for repeatability, portability, and ease of installation. This feat is accomplished from the onset with download acquisitions of any raw data type (FASTQ, CRAM, IDAT) straight through to the generation of a clean merged data file that can combine any user-preferred datasets using robust programs such as BWA, Samtools, and BCFtools. Users can customize and direct their workflow with one straightforward configuration file. Iliad is compatible with Linux, MacOS, and Windows platforms and scalable from a local machine to a high-performance computing cluster. Conclusion: Iliad offers automated workflows with optimized time and resource management that are comparable to other workflows available but generates analysis-ready VCF files from the most common datatypes using a single command. The storage footprint challenge of genomic data is overcome by utilizing temporary intermediate files before the final VCF is generated. This file is ready for use in imputation, genome-wide association study (GWAS) pipelines, high-throughput population genetics studies, select gene candidate studies, and more. Iliad was developed to be portable, compatible, scalable, robust, and repeatable with a simplistic setup, so biologists that are less familiar with programming can manage their own big data with this open-source suite of workflows. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This study discusses the genetic mutations that have a significant association with economically important traits that would benefit tea breeders. The purpose of this study was to analyze the leaf quality and SNPs in quality-related genes in the tea plant collection of 20 mutant genotypes growing without nitrogen fertilizers. Leaf N-content, catechins, L-theanine, and caffeine contents were analyzed in dry leaves via HPLC. Additionally, the photochemical yield, electron transport efficiency, and non-photochemical quenching were analyzed using PAM-fluorimetry. The next generation pooled amplicon–sequencing approach was used for SNPs-calling in 30 key genes related to N metabolism and leaf quality. The leaf N content varied significantly among genotypes (p ≤ 0.05) from 2.3 to 3.7% of dry mass. The caffeine content varied from 0.7 to 11.7 mg g−1, and the L-theanine content varied from 0.2 to 5.8 mg g−1 dry leaf mass. Significant positive correlations were detected between the nitrogen content and biochemical parameters such as theanine, caffeine, and most of the catechins. However, significant negative correlations were observed between the photosynthetic parameters (Y, ETR, Fv/Fm) and several biochemical compounds, including rutin, Quercetin-3-O-glucoside, Kaempferol-3-O-rutinoside, Kaempferol-3-O-glucoside, Theaflavin-3′-gallate, gallic acid. From our SNP-analysis, three SNPs in WRKY57 were detected in all genotypes with a low N content. Moreover, 29 SNPs with a high or moderate effect were specific for #316 (high N-content, high quality) or #507 (low N-content, low quality). The use of a linear regression model revealed 16 significant associations; theaflavin, L-theanine, and ECG were associated with several SNPs of the following genes: ANSa, DFRa, GDH2, 4CL, AlaAT1, MYB4, LHT1, F3′5′Hb, UFGTa. Among them, seven SNPs of moderate effect led to changes in the amino acid contents in the final proteins of the following genes: ANSa, GDH2, 4Cl, F3′5′Hb, UFGTa. These results will be useful for further evaluations of the important SNPs and will help to provide a better understanding of the mechanisms of nitrogen uptake efficiency in tree crops. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Over the past 30 years, a community of scientists has pieced together every base pair of the human reference genome from telomere to telomere. Interestingly, most human genomics studies omit more than 5% of the genome from their analyses. Under "normal" circumstances, omitting any chromosome(s) from an analysis of the human genome would be a cause for concern, with the exception being sex chromosomes. Sex chromosomes in eutherians share an evolutionary origin as an ancestral pair of autosomes. In humans, they share 3 regions of high-sequence identity (~98-100%), which, along with the unique transmission patterns of the sex chromosomes, introduce technical artifacts in genomic analyses. However, the human X chromosome bears numerous important genes, including more "immune response" genes than any other chromosome, which makes its exclusion irresponsible when sex differences across human diseases are widespread. To better characterize the possible effect of the inclusion/exclusion of the X chromosome on variants called, we conducted a pilot study on the Terra cloud platform to replicate a subset of standard genomic practices using both the CHM13 reference genome and the sex chromosome complement-aware reference genome. We compared the quality of variant calling, expression quantification, and allele-specific expression using these 2 reference genome versions across 50 human samples from the Genotype-Tissue Expression consortium annotated as females. We found that after correction, the whole X chromosome (100%) can generate reliable variant calls, allowing for the inclusion of the whole genome in human genomics analyses as a departure from the status quo of omitting the sex chromosomes from empirical and clinical genomics studies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Background With the continuous advances in third-generation sequencing technology and the increasing affordability of next-generation sequencing technology, sequencing data from different sequencing technology platforms is becoming more common. While numerous benchmarking studies have been conducted to compare variant-calling performance across different platforms and approaches, little attention has been paid to the potential of leveraging the strengths of different platforms to optimize overall performance, especially integrating Oxford Nanopore and Illumina sequencing data. Results We investigated the impact of multi-platform data on the performance of variant calling through carefully designed experiments with a deep learning-based variant caller named Clair3-MP (Multi-Platform). Through our research, we not only demonstrated the capability of ONT-Illumina data for improved variant calling, but also identified the optimal scenarios for utilizing ONT-Illumina data. In addition, we revealed that the improvement in variant calling using ONT-Illumina data comes from an improvement in difficult genomic regions, such as the large low-complexity regions and segmental and collapse duplication regions. Moreover, Clair3-MP can incorporate reference genome stratification information to achieve a small but measurable improvement in variant calling. Clair3-MP is accessible as an open-source project at: https://github.com/HKU-BAL/Clair3-MP . Conclusions These insights have important implications for researchers and practitioners alike, providing valuable guidance for improving the reliability and efficiency of genomic analysis in diverse applications.

Abstract Background Many computational methods have been developed to detect non-reference transposable element (TE) insertions using short-read whole genome sequencing data. The diversity and complexity of such methods often present challenges to new users seeking to reproducibly install, execute, or evaluate multiple TE insertion detectors. Results We previously developed the McClintock meta-pipeline to facilitate the installation, execution, and evaluation of six first-generation short-read TE detectors. Here, we report a completely re-implemented version of McClintock written in Python using Snakemake and Conda that improves its installation, error handling, speed, stability, and extensibility. McClintock 2 now includes 12 short-read TE detectors, auxiliary pre-processing and analysis modules, interactive HTML reports, and a simulation framework to reproducibly evaluate the accuracy of component TE detectors. When applied to the model microbial eukaryote Saccharomyces cerevisiae, we find substantial variation in the ability of McClintock 2 components to identify the precise locations of non-reference TE insertions, with RelocaTE2 showing the highest recall and precision in simulated data. We find that RelocaTE2, TEMP, TEMP2 and TEBreak provide consistent estimates of $$\sim$$ ∼ 50 non-reference TE insertions per strain and that Ty2 has the highest number of non-reference TE insertions in a species-wide panel of $$\sim$$ ∼ 1000 yeast genomes. Finally, we show that best-in-class predictors for yeast applied to resequencing data have sufficient resolution to reveal a dyad pattern of integration in nucleosome-bound regions upstream of yeast tRNA genes for Ty1, Ty2, and Ty4, allowing us to extend knowledge about fine-scale target preferences revealed previously for experimentally-induced Ty1 insertions to spontaneous insertions for other copia-superfamily retrotransposons in yeast. Conclusion McClintock ( https://github.com/bergmanlab/mcclintock/ ) provides a user-friendly pipeline for the identification of TEs in short-read WGS data using multiple TE detectors, which should benefit researchers studying TE insertion variation in a wide range of different organisms. Application of the improved McClintock system to simulated and empirical yeast genome data reveals best-in-class methods and novel biological insights for one of the most widely-studied model eukaryotes and provides a paradigm for evaluating and selecting non-reference TE detectors in other species.

The integration of target capture systems with next-generation sequencing has emerged as an efficient tool for exploring specific genetic regions with a high resolution and facilitating the rapid discovery of novel alleles. Despite these advancements, the application of targeted sequencing methodologies, such as the myBaits technology, in polyploid oat species remains relatively unexplored. In this study, we utilized the myBaits target capture method offered by Daicel Arbor Biosciences to detect variants and assess their reliability for variant detection in oat genomics and breeding. Ten oat genotypes were carefully chosen for targeted sequencing, focusing on specific regions on chromosome 2A to detect variants. The selected region harbors 98 genes. Precisely designed baits targeting the genes within these regions were employed for the target capture sequencing. We employed various mappers and variant callers to identify variants. After the identification of variants, we focused on the variants identified via all variants callers to assess the applicability of the myBaits sequencing methodology in oat breeding. In our efforts to validate the identified variants, we focused on two SNPs, one deletion and one insertion identified via all variant callers in the genotypes KF-318 and NOS 819111-70 but absent in the remaining eight genotypes. The Sanger sequencing of targeted SNPs failed to reproduce target capture data obtained through the myBaits technology. Similarly, the validation of deletion and insertion variants via high-resolution melting (HRM) curve analysis also failed to reproduce target capture data, again suggesting limitations in the reliability of the myBaits target capture sequencing using short-read sequencing for variant detection in the oat genome. This study shed light on the importance of exercising caution when employing the myBaits target capture strategy for variant detection in oats. This study provides valuable insights for breeders seeking to advance oat breeding efforts and marker development using myBaits target capture sequencing, emphasizing the significance of methodological sequencing considerations in oat genomics research.

Abstract Background Despite the wide variety of Next Generation Sequencing (NGS)-based methods, it remains challenging to detect mutations present at very low frequencies. This problem is particularly relevant in oncology, where the limiting amount of input material, and its low quality, often limit the performance of the assays. Unique Molecular Identifiers (UMIs) are a molecular barcoding system often coupled with computational methods of noise suppression to improve the reliability of detection of rare variants. Although widely adopted, UMI inclusion imposes additional technical complexity and sequencing cost. Currently, there are no guidelines on UMI usage nor a comprehensive evaluation of their advantage across different applications. Methods We used DNA sequencing data generated by molecular barcoding and hybridization-based enrichment, from various types and quantities of input material (fresh frozen, formaldehyde-treated and cell-free DNA), to evaluate the performance of variant calling in different clinically relevant contexts. Results Noise suppression achieved by read grouping based on fragment mapping positions ensures reliable variant calling for many experimental designs even without exogenous UMIs. Exogenous barcodes significantly improve performance only when mapping position collisions occur, which is common in cell-free DNA. Conclusions We demonstrate that UMI usage is not universally beneficial across experimental designs and that it is worthwhile to critically consider the comparative advantage of UMI usage for a given NGS application prior to experimental design.

Abstract The impact of millions of individual genetic variants on molecular phenotypes in coding sequences remains unknown. Multiplexed assays of variant effect (MAVEs) are scalable methods to annotate relevant variants, but existing software lacks standardization, requires cumbersome configuration, and does not scale to large targets. We present satmut_utils as a flexible solution for simulation and variant quantification. We then benchmark MAVE software using simulated and real MAVE data. We finally determine mRNA abundance for thousands of cystathionine beta-synthase variants using two experimental methods. The satmut_utils package enables high-performance analysis of MAVEs and reveals the capability of variants to alter mRNA abundance.

Exome sequencing (ES) is a recommended first-tier diagnostic test for many rare monogenic diseases. It allows for the detection of both single-nucleotide variants (SNVs) and copy number variants (CNVs) in coding exonic regions of the genome in a single test, and this dual analysis is a valuable approach, especially in limited resource settings. Single-nucleotide variants are well studied; however, the incorporation of copy number variant analysis tools into variant calling pipelines has not been implemented yet as a routine diagnostic test, and chromosomal microarray is still more widely used to detect copy number variants. Research shows that combined single and copy number variant analysis can lead to a diagnostic yield of up to 58%, increasing the yield with as much as 18% from the single-nucleotide variant only pipeline. Importantly, this is achieved with the consideration of computational costs only, without incurring any additional sequencing costs. This mini review provides an overview of copy number variant analysis from exome data and what the current recommendations are for this type of analysis. We also present an overview on rare monogenic disease research standard practices in resource-limited settings. We present evidence that integrating copy number variant detection tools into a standard exome sequencing analysis pipeline improves diagnostic yield and should be considered a significantly beneficial addition, with relatively low-cost implications. Routine implementation in underrepresented populations and limited resource settings will promote generation and sharing of CNV datasets and provide momentum to build core centers for this niche within genomic medicine.

Long-read sequencing technologies such as Oxford Nanopore Technologies (ONT) enabled researchers to sequence long reads fast and cost-effectively. ONT sequencing uses nanopores integrated into semiconductor surfaces and sequences the genomic materials using changes in current across the surface as each nucleotide passes through the nanopore. The default output of ONT sequencers is in FAST5 format. The first and one of the most important steps of ONT data analysis is the conversion of FAST5 files to FASTQ files using "base caller" tools. Generally, base caller tools pre-trained deep learning models to transform electrical signals into reads. Guppy, the most commonly used base caller, uses 2 main model types, fast and high accuracy. Since the computation duration is significantly different between these two models, the effect of models on the variant calling process has not been fully understood. This study aims to evaluate the effect of different models on performance on variant calling. In this study, 15 lowcoverage long-read sequencing results coming from different flow cells of NA12878 (gold standard data) were used to compare the variant calling results of Guppy. Obtained results indicated that the number of output FASTQ files, read counts and average read lengths between fast and high accuracy models are not statistically significant while pass/fail ratios of the base called datasets are significantly higher in high accuracy models. Results also indicated that the difference in pass/fail ratios arises in a significant difference in the number of called Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs), insertions and deletions (InDels). Interestingly the true positive rates of SNPs are not significantly different. These results show that using fast models for SNP calling does not affect the true positive rates statistically. The primary observation in this study, using fast models does not decrease the true positive rate but decreases the called variants that arise due to altered pass/fail ratios. Also, it is not advised to use fast models for InDel calling while both the number of InDels and true positive rates are significantly lower in fast models. This study, to the best of our knowledge, is the first study that evaluates the effect of different base calling models of Guppy, one of the most common and ONTsupported base callers, on variant calling. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: With the continuous advances in third-generation sequencing technology and the increasing affordability of next-generation sequencing technology, sequencing data from different sequencing technology platforms is becoming more common. While numerous benchmarking studies have been conducted to compare variant-calling performance across different platforms and approaches, little attention has been paid to the potential of leveraging the strengths of different platforms to optimize overall performance, especially integrating Oxford Nanopore and Illumina sequencing data. Results: We investigated the impact of multi-platform data on the performance of variant calling through carefully designed experiments with a deep learning-based variant caller named Clair3-MP (Multi-Platform). Through our research, we not only demonstrated the capability of ONT-Illumina data for improved variant calling, but also identified the optimal scenarios for utilizing ONT-Illumina data. In addition, we revealed that the improvement in variant calling using ONT-Illumina data comes from an improvement in difficult genomic regions, such as the large low-complexity regions and segmental and collapse duplication regions. Moreover, Clair3-MP can incorporate reference genome stratification information to achieve a small but measurable improvement in variant calling. Clair3-MP is accessible as an open-source project at: https://github.com/HKU-BAL/Clair3-MP. Conclusions: These insights have important implications for researchers and practitioners alike, providing valuable guidance for improving the reliability and efficiency of genomic analysis in diverse applications. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Many computational methods have been developed to detect non-reference transposable element (TE) insertions using short-read whole genome sequencing data. The diversity and complexity of such methods often present challenges to new users seeking to reproducibly install, execute, or evaluate multiple TE insertion detectors. Results: We previously developed the McClintock meta-pipeline to facilitate the installation, execution, and evaluation of six first-generation short-read TE detectors. Here, we report a completely re-implemented version of McClintock written in Python using Snakemake and Conda that improves its installation, error handling, speed, stability, and extensibility. McClintock 2 now includes 12 short-read TE detectors, auxiliary pre-processing and analysis modules, interactive HTML reports, and a simulation framework to reproducibly evaluate the accuracy of component TE detectors. When applied to the model microbial eukaryote Saccharomyces cerevisiae, we find substantial variation in the ability of McClintock 2 components to identify the precise locations of non-reference TE insertions, with RelocaTE2 showing the highest recall and precision in simulated data. We find that RelocaTE2, TEMP, TEMP2 and TEBreak provide consistent estimates of ∼ 50 non-reference TE insertions per strain and that Ty2 has the highest number of non-reference TE insertions in a species-wide panel of ∼ 1000 yeast genomes. Finally, we show that best-in-class predictors for yeast applied to resequencing data have sufficient resolution to reveal a dyad pattern of integration in nucleosome-bound regions upstream of yeast tRNA genes for Ty1, Ty2, and Ty4, allowing us to extend knowledge about fine-scale target preferences revealed previously for experimentally-induced Ty1 insertions to spontaneous insertions for other copia-superfamily retrotransposons in yeast. Conclusion: McClintock (https://github.com/bergmanlab/mcclintock/) provides a user-friendly pipeline for the identification of TEs in short-read WGS data using multiple TE detectors, which should benefit researchers studying TE insertion variation in a wide range of different organisms. Application of the improved McClintock system to simulated and empirical yeast genome data reveals best-in-class methods and novel biological insights for one of the most widely-studied model eukaryotes and provides a paradigm for evaluating and selecting non-reference TE detectors in other species. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Background Recent advances in long-read sequencing technologies have enabled accurate identification of all genetic variants in individuals or cells; this procedure is known as variant calling. However, benchmarking studies on variant calling using different long-read sequencing technologies are still lacking. Results We used two Caenorhabditis elegans strains to measure several variant calling metrics. These two strains shared true-positive genetic variants that were introduced during strain generation. In addition, both strains contained common and distinguishable variants induced by DNA damage, possibly leading to false-positive estimation. We obtained accurate and noisy long reads from both strains using high-fidelity (HiFi) and continuous long-read (CLR) sequencing platforms, and compared the variant calling performance of the two platforms. HiFi identified a 1.65-fold higher number of true-positive variants on average, with 60% fewer false-positive variants, than CLR did. We also compared read-based and assembly-based variant calling methods in combination with subsampling of various sequencing depths and demonstrated that variant calling after genome assembly was particularly effective for detection of large insertions, even with 10 × sequencing depth of accurate long-read sequencing data. Conclusions By directly comparing the two long-read sequencing technologies, we demonstrated that variant calling after genome assembly with 10 × or more depth of accurate long-read sequencing data allowed reliable detection of true-positive variants. Considering the high cost of HiFi sequencing, we herein propose appropriate methodologies for performing cost-effective and high-quality variant calling: 10 × assembly-based variant calling. The results of the present study may facilitate the development of methods for identifying all genetic variants at the population level.

We present the results of the human genomic small variant calling benchmarking initiative of the German Research Foundation (DFG) funded Next Generation Sequencing Competence Network (NGS-CN) and the German Human Genome-Phenome Archive (GHGA). In this effort, we developed NCBench, a continuous benchmarking platform for the evaluation of small genomic variant callsets in terms of recall, precision, and false positive/negative error patterns. NCBench is implemented as a continuously re-evaluated open-source repository. We show that it is possible to entirely rely on public free infrastructure (Github, Github Actions, Zenodo) in combination with established open-source tools. NCBench is agnostic of the used dataset and can evaluate an arbitrary number of given callsets, while reporting the results in a visual and interactive way. We used NCBench to evaluate over 40 callsets generated by various variant calling pipelines available in the participating groups that were run on three exome datasets from different enrichment kits and at different coverages. While all pipelines achieve high overall quality, subtle systematic differences between callers and datasets exist and are made apparent by NCBench.These insights are useful to improve existing pipelines and develop new workflows. NCBench is meant to be open for the contribution of any given callset. Most importantly, for authors, it will enable the omission of repeated re-implementation of paper-specific variant calling benchmarks for the publication of new tools or pipelines, while readers will benefit from being able to (continuously) observe the performance of tools and pipelines at the time of reading instead of at the time of writing.

Genomic sequencing of clinical samples to identify emerging variants of SARS-CoV-2 has been a key public health tool for curbing the spread of the virus. As a result, an unprecedented number of SARS-CoV-2 genomes were sequenced during the COVID-19 pandemic, which allowed for rapid identification of genetic variants, enabling the timely design and testing of therapies and deployment of new vaccine formulations to combat the new variants. However, despite the technological advances of deep sequencing, the analysis of the raw sequence data generated globally is neither standardized nor consistent, leading to vastly disparate sequences that may impact identification of variants. Here, we show that for both Illumina and Oxford Nanopore sequencing platforms, downstream bioinformatic protocols used by industry, government, and academic groups resulted in different virus sequences from same sample. These bioinformatic workflows produced consensus genomes with differences in single nucleotide polymorphisms, inclusion and exclusion of insertions, and/or deletions, despite using the same raw sequence as input datasets. Here, we compared and characterized such discrepancies and propose a specific suite of parameters and protocols that should be adopted across the field. Consistent results from bioinformatic workflows are fundamental to SARS-CoV-2 and future pathogen surveillance efforts, including pandemic preparation, to allow for a data-driven and timely public health response.

The vast majority of the human genome is non-coding. There is a diversity of non-coding features, some of which have functional importance. Although the non-coding regions constitute the majority of the genome, they remain understudied, and for a long time, these regions have been referred to as junk DNA. Pseudogenes are one of these features. A pseudogene is a non-functional copy of a protein-coding gene. Pseudogenes may arise through a variety of genetic mechanisms. Processed pseudogenes are formed through reverse transcription of mRNA by LINE elements, after which the cDNA is integrated into the genome. Processed pseudogenes are known to be variable across populations; however, the variability and distribution remains unknown. Herein, we apply a custom-designed processed pseudogene pipeline on the whole genome sequencing data of 3,500 individuals; 2,500 individuals from the thousand genomes dataset, as well as 1,000 Swedish individuals. Through these analyses, we discover over 3,000 pseudogenes missing from the GRCh38 reference. Utilising our pipeline, we position 74% of the detected processed pseudogenes—allowing for analyses of formation. Notably, we find that common structural variant callers, such as Delly, classify the processed pseudogenes as deletion events, which are later predicted to be truncating variants. By compiling lists of non-reference processed pseudogenes and their frequencies, we find a great variability of pseudogenes; indicating that non-reference processed pseudogenes may be useful for DNA testing and as population-specific markers. In summary, our findings highlight a great diversity of processed pseudogenes, that processed pseudogenes are actively formed in the human genome; and that our pipeline may be used to reduce false positive structural variation caused by the misalignment and subsequent misclassification of non-reference processed pseudogenes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The advent of genomic big data and the statistical need for reaching significant results have led genome-wide association studies to be ravenous of a huge number of genetic markers scattered along the whole genome. Since its very beginning, the so-called genotype imputation served this purpose; this statistical and inferential procedure based on a known reference panel opened the theoretical possibility to extend association analyses to a greater number of polymorphic sites which have not been previously assayed by the used technology. In this review, we present a broad overview of the genotype imputation process, showing the most known methods and presenting the main areas of interest, with a closer look to the most up-to-date approaches and a deeper understanding of its usage in the presentday genomic landscape, shedding a light on its future developments and investigation areas. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Retinoblastoma (RB) is a childhood cancer that forms in the developing retina of young children; this tumor cannot be biopsied due to the risk of provoking extraocular tumor spread, which dramatically alters the treatment and survival of the patient. Recently, aqueous humor (AH), the clear fluid in the anterior chamber of the eye, has been developed as an organ-specific liquid biopsy for investigation of in vivo tumor-derived information found in the cell-free DNA (cfDNA) of the biofluid. However, identifying somatic genomic alterations, including both somatic copy number alterations (SCNAs) and single nucleotide variations (SNVs) of the RB1 gene, typically requires either: (1) two distinct experimental protocols—low-pass whole genome sequencing for SCNAs and targeted sequencing for SNVs—or (2) expensive deep whole genome or exome sequencing. To save time and cost, we applied a one-step targeted sequencing method to identify both SCNAs and RB1 SNVs in children with RB. High concordance (median = 96.2%) was observed in comparing SCNA calls derived from targeted sequencing to the traditional low-pass whole genome sequencing method. We further applied this method to investigate the degree of concordance of genomic alterations between paired tumor and AH samples from 11 RB eyes. We found 11/11 AH samples (100%) had SCNAs, and 10 of them (90.1%) with recurrent RB-SCNAs, while only nine out of 11 tumor samples (81.8%) had positive RB-SCNA signatures in both low-pass and targeted methods. Eight out of the nine (88.9%) detected SNVs were shared between AH and tumor samples. Ultimately, 11/11 cases have somatic alterations identified, including nine RB1 SNVs and 10 recurrent RB-SCNAs with four focal RB1 deletions and one MYCN gain. The results presented show the feasibility of utilizing one sequencing approach to obtain SCNA and targeted SNV data to capture a broad genomic scope of RB disease, which may ultimately expedite clinical intervention and be less expensive than other methods. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Despite the wide variety of Next Generation Sequencing (NGS)-based methods, it remains challenging to detect mutations present at very low frequencies. This problem is particularly relevant in oncology, where the limiting amount of input material, and its low quality, often limit the performance of the assays. Unique Molecular Identifiers (UMIs) are a molecular barcoding system often coupled with computational methods of noise suppression to improve the reliability of detection of rare variants. Although widely adopted, UMI inclusion imposes additional technical complexity and sequencing cost. Currently, there are no guidelines on UMI usage nor a comprehensive evaluation of their advantage across different applications. Methods: We used DNA sequencing data generated by molecular barcoding and hybridization-based enrichment, from various types and quantities of input material (fresh frozen, formaldehyde-treated and cell-free DNA), to evaluate the performance of variant calling in different clinically relevant contexts. Results: Noise suppression achieved by read grouping based on fragment mapping positions ensures reliable variant calling for many experimental designs even without exogenous UMIs. Exogenous barcodes significantly improve performance only when mapping position collisions occur, which is common in cell-free DNA. Conclusions: We demonstrate that UMI usage is not universally beneficial across experimental designs and that it is worthwhile to critically consider the comparative advantage of UMI usage for a given NGS application prior to experimental design. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Here, we demonstrate improvements to our bioinformatic pipeline, PING, which provides high‐resolution genotyping of killer‐cell immunoglobulin‐like receptor (KIR) sequencing data, that expand the method to provide KIR interpretation from whole genome sequencing (WGS) data. We evaluated performance using synthetic sequence datasets and real‐world data from the 1000 Genomes Project (1KGP). PING demonstrated high exonic genotyping performance on the synthetic sequence dataset meant to approximate real‐world data at 95% accuracy (N = 1366). This result was mirrored in the analysis of 1KGP European data (N = 215) with most genes showing near or below 5% frequency of unresolved exonic genotypes, which is an important indicator for genotyping errors in real‐world data. An analysis into the distributions of genotyping errors for the synthetic sequence datasets gave insights into how to further improve genotype accuracy. Similarly, an analysis into ambiguous exonic genotype frequencies for the 1KGP European data, which showed high rates of unresolved genotypes, highlighted that an effective phasing method will be an impactful future additional to the PING workflow. Together, these results demonstrate that PING can effectively provide high‐resolution KIR genotyping on WGS data. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]