Search

Described here are three cases of acute native valve endocarditis due to the coagulase-negative pathogenStaphylococcus lugdunensiswith serious complications. Two of the three patients died despite optimal antibiotic therapy and cardiovascular surgery. These cases demonstrate the aggressive nature ofS. lugdunensisand emphasize the importance of identifying coagulase-negative staphylococci to the species level and not considering the isolation ofS. lugdunensisfrom normally sterile body fluids as contamination. On the contrary, when this organism is found in patients with endocarditis, early surgery should be considered. The possibility that this organism could be misidentified asS. aureusbecause of ‘autocoagulation’ and that commercial identification systems may misidentify it asS. haemolyticus,S. hominisorS. warnerishould also be remembered. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives/background: We aimed to investigate routine urinalysis practices in Belgian laboratories and verify these findings against the 2023 European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (EFLM) European Urinalysis Guideline., Methods: A questionnaire was developed to collect information on pre- to postanalytical aspects of urine test strip and particle analysis. The questionnaire was distributed by Sciensano to all Belgian laboratories, licensed to perform urine particle analysis., Results: Sixty-six percent of the Belgian laboratories (75/113) participated. The responding laboratories served physicians in private (25%), hospital (60%) and university hospital (15%) setting. All laboratories performed test strip and particle analysis, predominantly automatically (97% and 96%, respectively). In addition, most laboratories (87%) used intelligent verification criteria to optimize diagnostic accuracy. Almost all laboratories (≥90%) screened and reported a minimal biochemistry panel (glucose, protein, pH, ketones) and particle count (red and white blood cells). Independent of the technology, a notable variability was observed regarding medical cut-off values and advanced particle differentiation and reporting. Internal quality control was extensively performed for urine test strip (91%) and particle analysis (96%), while external QC was less common (32% and 36%, respectively). Consequently, only few laboratories were ISO15189 accredited for urine test strip (15%) and particle analysis (17%)., Conclusion: There is considerable variability in current urinalysis performed in Belgian laboratories. The 2023 EFLM urinalysis guideline has the potential to guide clinical laboratories towards improving their urinalysis practices. Additional efforts are required to implement these recommendations into clinical practice in Belgium.

Background and Aims: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) manifests through various symptoms and systemic manifestations. Diagnosis involves serological markers like rheumatoid factor (RF) and anti-citrullinated protein antibodies (ACPA). Past studies have shown the added value of likelihood ratios (LRs) in result interpretation. LRs can be combined with pretest probability to estimate posttest probability for RA. There is a lack of information on pretest probability. This study aimed to estimate pretest probabilities for RA., Materials and Methods: This retrospective study included 133 consecutive RA patients and 651 consecutive disease controls presenting at a rheumatology outpatient clinic. Disease characteristics, risk factors associated with RA and laboratory parameters were documented for calculating pretest probabilities and LRs., Results: Joint involvement, erosions, morning stiffness, and positive CRP, ESR tests significantly correlated with RA. Based on these factors, probabilities for RA were estimated. Besides, LRs for RA were established for RF and ACPA and combinations thereof. LRs increased with antibody levels and were highest for double high positivity. Posttest probabilities were estimated based on pretest probability and LR., Conclusion: By utilizing pretest probabilities for RA and LRs for RF and ACPA, posttest probabilities were estimated. Such approach enhances diagnostic accuracy, offering laboratory professionals and clinicians insights in the value of serological testing during the diagnostic process., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: [XB received lecture fees from Thermo Fisher and Werfen and has been a consultant for Werfen. LVH received lecture fees from Thermo Fisher and Werfen andhas been a consultant for Thermo Fisher]., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Introduction: Proper implementation of Point-of-Care testing (POCT) for C-reactive protein (CRP) in primary care can decrease the inappropriate use of antibiotics, thereby tackling the problem of growing antimicrobial resistance., Objective: The analytical performance and user-friendliness of four POCT-CRP assays were evaluated: QuikRead go easy, LumiraDx, cobas b 101 and Afinion 2., Materials and Methods: Imprecision was evaluated using plasma pools in addition to manufacturer-specific control material. Trueness was assessed by verification of traceability to ERM-DA474/IFCC in parallel to method comparison towards the central laboratory CRP method (cobas c 503) using i) retrospectively selected plasma samples (n = 100) and ii) prospectively collected capillary whole blood samples (n = 50). User-friendliness was examined using a questionnaire., Results: Between-day imprecision on plasma pools varied from 4.5 % (LumiraDx) to 11.5 % (QuikRead). Traceability verification revealed no significant difference between cobas c 503 CRP results and the ERM-DA474/IFCC certified value. cobas b 101 and Afinion achieved the best agreement with the central laboratory method. LumiraDx and QuikRead revealed a negative mean difference, with LumiraDx violating the criterion of > 95 % of POCT-CRP-results within ± 20 % of the comparison method. Regarding user-friendliness, Afinion obtained the highest Likert-scores., Conclusion: The analytical performance and user-friendliness of POCT-CRP devices varies among manufacturers, emphasizing the need for quality assurance supervised by a central laboratory., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Autoantibodies are important laboratory markers to support diagnosis of autoimmune diseases. Interpretation of autoantibodies is classically done in a dichotomous way (positive versus negative). Yet, interpretation of autoantibody test results can be improved by reporting likelihood ratios. Likelihood ratios convey information on how much more/less likely a test result is in individuals with the disease compared to individuals without the disease. It incorporates information on the antibody level (the higher the antibody level, the higher the association with the disease), which is helpful for (differential) diagnosis. Likelihood ratios are unit-independent and allow users to harmonize test result interpretation. When the likelihood ratio is combined with information on the pre-test probability, post-test probability can be appraised. In this review, the applicability of likelihood ratio in autoimmune diagnostics will be reviewed from the perspective of the clinician, the laboratory professional and the in vitro diagnostic industry., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Xavier Bossuyt reports a relationship with Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. that includes: speaking and lecture fees. Xavier Bossuyt reports a relationship with Werfen that includes: consulting or advisory and speaking and lecture fees. Kevin Deane reports a relationship with Werfen that includes: consulting or advisory. Kevin Deane reports a relationship with Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. that includes: consulting or advisory. Lieve Van Hoovels reports a relationship with Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. that includes: speaking and lecture fees. Veena Joy reports a relationship with Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. that includes: employment. Nina Olschowka reports a relationship with Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. that includes: employment. If there are other authors, they declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Classification criteria have been developed for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and other rheumatic diseases in order to gather a homogeneous patient population for clinical studies and facilitate the timely implementation of therapeutic measures. Although classification criteria are not intended to be used for diagnosis, they are frequently used to support the diagnostic process in clinical practice, including clinical decision-making. The 2010 American College of Rheumatology (ACR)/European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology (EULAR) classification criteria for RA are capable of identifying the majority of symptomatic patients with RA already in the earliest stages of the disease who are not yet showing radiographic changes. These patients will also profit from the early implementation of therapy with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs). However, the risk of misclassification is higher as compared with the former 1987 ACR criteria, which were considerably less sensitive to the recognition of patients with early RA. Of note, the presence of rheumatoid factors (RFs) and anticitrullinated protein antibodies (ACPAs) has been attributed equal weight in the 2010 ACR/EULAR criteria and may contribute up to 50% of the score needed for being classified as RA. However, while ACPAs have been proven to be the most specific serological markers of RA, the specificity of RF is moderate, especially at lower titres. This may lead to the misclassification of RF-positive patients and, consequently, the unjustified implementation of DMARD therapy. Therefore, issues arise on how comprehensive the criteria should be and whether they should be updated and adapted to findings from the past two decades that might increase both their specificity and sensitivity., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Current classification criteria for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) encompass clinical and immunological items and are capable of correctly identifying the majority of symptomatic RA patients. The presence of positive rheumatoid factor (RF) and/or and anti-cyclic citrullinated protein/peptide antibodies (ACPA) gaining increasing importance according to their serological titer eases the recognition of RA, yet the debate is open on whether this scoring system ought to be optimized by hierarchizing ACPA or the combination of ACPA and RF over single positivity, prioritizing specificity over sensitivity. The risk of misdiagnosis and misclassification are often entangled, yet they are not the same. In fact, while ideal diagnosis requires 100% sensitivity and specificity, classification criteria are conceived to gather a homogeneous patient population, favoring specificity over sensitivity. Nevertheless, as they are frequently summoned to support the diagnostic process in clinical practice, issues arise on how comprehensive those should be and on how frequently they should be updated in light of novel acquisitions regarding measurable RA-related abnormalities. In this viewpoint two different views on the topic are confronted, discussing the performance of available criteria and the potentiality and pitfalls of their refinement according to novel data on ACPA and RF contribution and emergence of newly discovered specificities., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background and Aim: Calprotectin (CLP) is a heterodimeric complex formed by two S100 proteins (S100A8/A9), which plays a pivotal role in innate immunity. Due to its intrinsic cytotoxic and proinflammatory properties, CLP controls cell differentiation, proliferation and NETosis and has been associated with a wide range of rheumatic diseases. Our review summarizes the widespread interest in circulating CLP (cCLP) as a biomarker of neutrophil-related inflammation, in autoimmune rheumatic disease (ARD) and non-ARD., Methods: A thorough literature review was performed using PubMed and EMBASE databases searching for circulating calprotectin and synonyms S100A8/A9, myeloid-related protein 8/14 (MRP8/MRP14), calgranulin A/B and L1 protein in addition to specific ARDs and autoimmune non-rheumatic diseases. We selected only English-language articles and excluded abstracts without the main text., Results: High cCLP serum levels are associated with worse structural outcomes in rheumatoid arthritis and to a lesser extent, in spondyloarthritis. In addition, cCLP can predict disease relapse in some autoimmune diseases including systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies-associated vasculitis (AAV) and some severe manifestations of connective tissue diseases, such as glomerulonephritis in SLE, AAV, juvenile idiopathic arthritis, adult-onset Still's disease and lung fibrosis in systemic sclerosis. Therefore, cCLP levels enable the identification of patients who need an accurate and tight follow-up. The clinical usefulness of cCLP as an inflammatory marker has been suggested for inflammatory/autoimmune non-rheumatic diseases, and especially for the monitoring of the inflammatory bowel diseases patients. Currently, there are only a few studies that evaluated the cCLP efficacy as a clinical biomarker in inflammatory/autoimmune non-rheumatic diseases with controversial results. Future studies are warranted to better clarify the role of cCLP in relation to the disease severity in myasthenia gravis, multiple sclerosis, chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy, Graves' orbitopathy, autoimmune bullous diseases and uveitis., Conclusion: Our literature review supports a relevant role of cCLP as potential prognostic biomarker mirroring local or systemic inflammation, especially in chronic inflammatory rheumatic diseases., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare no conflict of interests, (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

The soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR) is the bioactive form of uPAR, a membrane-bound glycoprotein, and it is primarily expressed on the surface of immunologically active cells. Mirroring local inflammation and immune activation, suPAR has gained interest as a potential prognostic biomarker in several inflammatory diseases. Indeed, in many diseases, including cancer, diabetes, cardiovascular diseases, kidney diseases, and inflammatory disorders, higher suPAR concentrations have been associated with disease severity, disease relapse, and mortality. Our review describes and discusses the supporting literature concerning the promising role of suPAR as a biomarker in different autoimmune rheumatic and non-rheumatic diseases., Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Objectives: Detection of antinuclear antibodies (ANA) by indirect immunofluorescence assay using HEp-2 cells (HEp-2 IFA) is used to screen for various autoimmune diseases. HEp-2 IFA suffers from variability, which hampers harmonization., Methods: A questionnaire was developed to collect information on HEp-2 IFA methodology, computer-assisted diagnosis (CAD) systems, training, inter-observer variability, quality assessment, reagent lot change control, and method verification. The questionnaire was distributed to laboratories by Sciensano (Belgium), national EASI groups (Italy, Croatia, Portugal, Estonia, Greece) and ICAP (worldwide). Answers were obtained by 414 laboratories. The results were analysed in the framework of the recent EFLM/EASI/ICAP ANA recommendations (companion paper)., Results: Laboratories used either HEp-2, HEp-2000, or HEp-20-10 cells and most laboratories (80%) applied the same screening dilution for children and adults. The conjugate used varied between laboratories [IgG-specific (in 57% of laboratories) vs. polyvalent]. Sixty-nine percent of CAD users reviewed the automatic nuclear pattern and 53% of CAD users did not fully exploit the fluorescence intensity for quality assurance. Internal quality control was performed by 96% of the laboratories, in 52% of the laboratories only with strongly positive samples. Interobserver variation was controlled by 79% of the laboratories. Limited lot-to-lot evaluation was performed by 68% of the laboratories. Method verification was done by 80% of the respondents., Conclusions: Even though many laboratories embrace high-quality HEp-2 IFA, substantial differences in how HEp-2 IFA is performed and controlled remain. Acting according to the EFLM/EASI/ICAP ANA recommendations can improve the global performance and quality of HEp-2 IFA and nurture harmonization., (© 2023 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston.)

Objectives: Antinuclear antibodies (ANA) are important for the diagnosis of various autoimmune diseases. ANA are usually detected by indirect immunofluorescence assay (IFA) using HEp-2 cells (HEp-2 IFA). There are many variables influencing HEp-2 IFA results, such as subjective visual reading, serum screening dilution, substrate manufacturing, microscope components and conjugate. Newer developments on ANA testing that offer novel features adopted by some clinical laboratories include automated computer-assisted diagnosis (CAD) systems and solid phase assays (SPA)., Methods: A group of experts reviewed current literature and established recommendations on methodological aspects of ANA testing. This process was supported by a two round Delphi exercise. International expert groups that participated in this initiative included (i) the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (EFLM) Working Group "Autoimmunity Testing"; (ii) the European Autoimmune Standardization Initiative (EASI); and (iii) the International Consensus on ANA Patterns (ICAP)., Results: In total, 35 recommendations/statements related to (i) ANA testing and reporting by HEp-2 IFA; (ii) HEp-2 IFA methodological aspects including substrate/conjugate selection and the application of CAD systems; (iii) quality assurance; (iv) HEp-2 IFA validation/verification approaches and (v) SPA were formulated. Globally, 95% of all submitted scores in the final Delphi round were above 6 (moderately agree, agree or strongly agree) and 85% above 7 (agree and strongly agree), indicating strong international support for the proposed recommendations., Conclusions: These recommendations are an important step to achieve high quality ANA testing., (© 2023 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston.)

Isocapnic hyperventilation (ICHV) is occasionally used to maintain the end-expired CO 2 partial pressure (P ET CO 2 ) when the inspired CO 2 (P I CO 2 ) rises. Whether maintaining P ET CO 2 with ICHV during an increase of the P I CO 2 also maintains arterial PCO 2 (P a CO 2 ) remains poorly documented. 12 ASA PS I-II subjects undergoing a robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) (n = 11) or cystectomy (n = 1) under general endotracheal anesthesia with sevoflurane in O 2 /air (40% inspired O 2 ) were enrolled. P I CO 2 was sequentially increased from 0 to 0.5, 1.0, 1.5 and 2% by adding CO 2 to the inspiratory limb of the circle system, while increasing ventilation to a target P ET CO 2 of 4.7-4.9% by adjusting respiratory rate during controlled mechanical ventilation. P a-ET CO 2 gradients were determined after a 15 min equilibration period at each P I CO 2 level and compared using ANOVA. Mean (standard deviation) age, height, and weight were 66 (6) years, 171 (6) cm, and 75 (8) kg, respectively. Capnograms were normal and hemodynamic parameters remained stable. P ET CO 2 could be maintained within 4.7-4.9% in all subjects at all times except in 1 subject with 1.5% P I CO 2 and 5 subjects with 2.0% P I CO 2 ; data from the one subject in whom both 1.5 and 2.0% P I CO 2 resulted in P ET CO 2  > 5.1% were excluded from analysis. P a-ET CO 2 gradients did not change when P I CO 2 increased. The effect of a modest rise of P I CO 2 up to 1.5% on P ET CO 2 during RARP can be readily overcome by increasing ventilation without altering the P a-ET CO 2 gradients. At higher P I CO 2 , airway pressures may become a limiting factor, which requires further study., (© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V.)

Objectives: Circulating calprotectin (cCLP) has been shown to be a promising prognostic marker for COVID-19 severity. We aimed to investigate the prognostic value of serial measurements of cCLP in COVID-19 patients admitted to an intensive care unit (ICU)., Methods: From November 2020 to May 2021, patients with COVID-19, admitted at the ICU of the OLV Hospital, Aalst, Belgium, were prospectively included. For sixty-six (66) patients, blood samples were collected at admission and subsequently every 48 h during ICU stay. On every sample (total n=301), a cCLP (EliA™ Calprotectin 2, Phadia 200, Thermo Fisher Scientific; serum/plasma protocol (for Research Use Only, -RUO-) and C-reactive protein (CRP; cobas c501/c503, Roche Diagnostics) analysis were performed. Linear mixed models were used to associate biomarkers levels with mortality, need for mechanical ventilation, length of stay at ICU (LOS-ICU) and medication use (antibiotics, corticosteroids, antiviral and immune suppressant/modulatory drugs)., Results: Longitudinally higher levels of all biomarkers were associated with LOS-ICU and with the need for mechanical ventilation. Medication use and LOS-ICU were not associated with variations in cCLP and CRP levels. cCLP levels increased significantly during ICU hospitalization in the deceased group (n=21/66) but decreased in the non-deceased group (n=45/66). In contrast, CRP levels decreased non-significantly in both patient groups, although significantly longitudinally higher CRP levels were obtained in the deceased subgroup., Conclusions: Serial measurements of cCLP provides prognostic information which can be useful to guide clinical management of COVID-19 patients in ICU setting., (© 2022 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston.)

Objectives: Rheumatoid factor (RF) is a well-established marker for the diagnosis and classification of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Most studies evaluated IgM RF or isotype-nonspecific total RF assays. We evaluated the added value of IgA RF in this context., Methods: An international sample cohort consisting of samples from 398 RA patients and 1073 controls was tested for IgA RF with 3 commercial assays. For all RA patients and 100 controls essential clinical and serological data for ACR/EULAR classification were available., Results: The sensitivity of IgA RF for diagnosing RA was lower than the sensitivity of IgM RF. Differences in numerical values between IgA RF assays were observed. With all assays, the highest IgA RF values were found in patients with primary Sjögren's syndrome. Double positivity for IgM RF and IgA RF had a higher specificity for RA than either IgM RF or IgA RF. The sensitivity of double positivity was lower than the sensitivity of either IgA RF or IgM RF. Single positivity for IgA RF was at least as prevalent in controls than in RA patients. Adding IgA RF to IgM RF and anti-citrullinated protein antibodies (ACPA) did not affect RA classification. However, combined positivity for IgA RF, IgM RF and IgG ACPA had a higher specificity and lower sensitivity for RA classification than positivity for either of the antibodies., Conclusions: IgA RF showed a lower sensitivity than IgM RF. Combining IgA RF with IgM RF and ACPA did not improve sensitivity of RA classification. Combined positivity (IgA-RF/IgM-RF/ACPA) increased specificity., (© 2022 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston.)

Objectives: Serum free light chain (sFLC) measurements have inherent analytical limitations impacting sFLC clinical interpretation. We evaluated analytical and diagnostic performance of three polyclonal sFLC assays on four analytical platforms., Methods: sFLC concentration was measured using Diazyme FLC assays (Diazyme) on cobas c501/c503 analyzer (Roche); Freelite assays (The Binding Site) on Optilite analyzer (The Binding Site) and cobas c501 analyzer and Sebia FLC ELISA assays (Sebia) on AP22 ELITE analyzer (DAS). Imprecision, linearity, method comparison vs. Freelite/Optilite, antigen excess detection and reference value verification were assessed. Diagnostic performance was compared on 120 serum samples and on follow-up samples of five patients with κ and λ monoclonal gammopathy., Results: Method comparison showed excellent correlation with Freelite/Optilite method for all assays. A large proportional negative bias was shown for both Sebia κ and λ ELISA and a significant positive proportional bias for λ in the low (<10 mg/L) Freelite/cobas c501 method. Clinically relevant underestimation of κ sFLC levels due to antigen excess was shown for 7% of each Diazyme/cobas application and for 11 and 32.1% of λ sFLC assay of respectively Diazyme/cobas and Sebia/AP22. sFLC reference values revealed application specific. Cohen's κ values were (very) good for κ sFLC but only moderate to good for λ sFLC. In 4/10 follow-up patients, significant differences in clinical interpretation between sFLC assays were noticed., Conclusions: Important analytical limitations remain for all sFLC applications. Differences in reference values and diagnostic performance hamper interchangeability of sFLC assays. Assay specific sFLC decision guidelines are warranted., (© 2022 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston.)

Introduction: Commercial assays measuring antibodies to citrullinated protein/peptide (ACPA) show poor quantitative agreement. The diagnostic industry has never adopted the International Union of Immunological Societies-Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (IUIS-CDC) ACPA reference standard. Recently, the National Institute for Biological Standards and Control (NIBSC) prepared a new candidate ACPA standard (18/204). We evaluated both reference materials using different commercially available ACPA assays., Materials and Methods: This is an international study in which the NIBSC candidate ACPA standard and the IUIS-CDC ACPA reference material were analysed together with 398 diagnostic samples from individuals with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and in 1073 individuals who did not have RA using nine commercial ACPA assays., Results: For both reference materials and samples from individuals with RA and individuals who did not have RA, there were large differences in quantitative ACPA results between assays. For most assays, values for the IUIS-CDC standard were lower than values for NIBSC 18/204 and the IUIS-CDC/NIBSC ratio was comparable for several, but not all assays. When NIBSC 18/204 was used as a calibrator, an improvement in alignment of ACPA results across several of the evaluated assays was obtained. Moreover, NIBSC 18/204 could align clinical interpretation for some but not all assays., Conclusion: Adoption of an international standard for ACPA determination is highly desirable. The candidate NIBSC 18/204 standard improved the standardisation and alignment of most ACPA assays and might therefore be recommended to be used as reference in commercial assays., Competing Interests: Competing interests: XB, LVH, GS and DS have received speaker fees from Thermo Fisher Scientific and have been a consultant for Thermo Fisher Scientific; BL and IH has received speaker fees from Thermo Fisher Scientific. All participating diagnostic companies in-kind provided the ACPA assays and provided technical training and support:Thermo Fisher Scientific, Uppsala, Sweden; Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany; Svar Life Science, Malmö, Sweden; Immunodiagnostic Systems (IDS), Tyne and Wear, United Kingdom; Orgentec, Mainz, Germany; Abbott, Wiesbaden, Germany; Euroimmun, Lübeck, Germany; Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, California, USA; and Siemens Healthineers, Sudbury, United Kingdom., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Background: There is a trend towards decentralisation of laboratory tests by means of Point-of-Care testing (POCT). Within hospitals, Belgian law requires a POCT policy, coordinated by the clinical laboratory. There is however no legal framework for POCT performed outside the hospital: no reimbursement, no compulsory quality monitoring and no limits nor control on the prices charged to the patient. Uncontrolled use of POCT can have negative consequences for individual and public health., Proposal: We propose that POCT outside hospitals would only be reimbursed for tests carried out within a legal framework, requiring evidence-based testing and collaboration with a clinical laboratory, because clinical laboratories have procedures for test validation and quality monitoring, are equipped for electronic data transfer, are familiar with logistical processes, can provide support when technical issues arise and can organise and certify training. Under these conditions the government investment will be offset by health benefits, e.g. fall in antibiotic consumption with POCT for CRP in primary care, quick response to SARS-CoV2-positive cases in COVID-19 triage centres., Priorities: 1° extension of the Belgian decree on certification of clinical laboratories to decentralised tests in primary care; 2° introduction of a separate reimbursement category for POCT; 3° introduction of reimbursement for a limited number of specified POCT; 4° setup of a Multidisciplinary POCT Advisory Council, the purpose of which is to draw up a model for reimbursement of POCT, to select tests eligible for reimbursement and to make proposals to the National Institute for Health and Disability Insurance ( RIZIV/INAMI ).

Background: Rheumatoid factor (RF) and anti-citrullinated protein/peptide antibodies (ACPA) are important biomarkers for diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). However, there is poor harmonisation of RF and ACPA assays. The aim of this study was to refine RF and ACPA interpretation across commercial assays., Materials and Methods: Six total RF isotype-non-specific assays, 3 RF IgM isotype-specific assays and 9 ACPA immunoglobulin G assays of 13 different companies were evaluated using 398 diagnostic samples from patients with RA and 1073 disease controls., Results: Using cut-offs proposed by the manufacturer, there was a large variability in diagnostic sensitivity and specificity between assays. Thresholds of antibody levels were determined based on predefined specificities and used to define test result intervals. Test result interval-specific likelihood ratios (LRs) were concordant across the different RF and ACPA assays. For all assays, the LR for RA increased with increasing antibody level. Higher LRs were found for ACPA than for RF. ACPA levels associated with LRs >80 were found in a substantial fraction (>22%) of patients with RA., Conclusion: Defining thresholds for antibody levels and assigning test result interval-specific LRs allows alignment of clinical interpretation for all RF and ACPA assays., Competing Interests: Competing interests: XB, LVH, GS and DS have received speaker fees from and have been a consultant for Thermo Fisher Scientific. LBernasconi and IH have received speaker fees from Thermo Fisher Scientific. DA and PJ are editorial board members of RMD Open. All participating diagnostic companies in-kind supported with RF/ACPA assays and technical training: Thermo Fisher Scientific, Uppsala, Sweden; Cambridge Life Science, Ely, UK; Ortho-Clinical Diagnostics, Raritan, New Jersey, USA; Diagam, Ghislenghien, Belgium; Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany; Svar Life Science, Malmö, Sweden; Immunodiagnostic Systems, Tyne and Wear, UK; Orgentec, Mainz, Germany; Abbott, Wiesbaden, Germany; Euroimmun, Lübeck, Germany; Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, California, USA; and Siemens Healthineers, Sudbury, UK., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Antibodies to dsDNA are an important laboratory parameter for diagnosis, monitoring and classification of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). In clinical laboratories, several techniques are used to detect and quantify anti-dsDNA antibodies. Each technique has its advantages and disadvantages regarding sensitivity, specificity, avidity and assay procedure. Assays differ with respect to the antigen source (native versus synthetic versus molecular biological) used and the way the antigen is presented (e.g. in solution, covalently linked to a solid phase,…). Consequently, correlation between assays can be poor and standardization of anti-dsDNA antibody tests is challenging. We here provide an overview of the currently available anti-dsDNA tests frequently used in clinical laboratories [Crithidia luciliae immunofluorescence test (CLIFT), Enzyme linked immune sorbent assay (ELISA), fluoroenzyme immunoassay (FEIA), chemiluminisence immunoassay (CIA), multiplexed bead-based assays and Farr-RIA] and their performance characteristics. From this literature study, we concluded that performance characteristics differ between assays. Often, a combination of techniques is necessary for the best result interpretation., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: During the recent SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, circulating calprotectin (cCLP) gained interest as biomarker to predict the severity of COVID-19. We aimed to investigate the prognostic value of cCLP measured in serum, heparin, EDTA and citrate plasma., Materials and Methods: COVID-19 patients were prospectively included, in parallel with two SARS-CoV-2 negative control populations. The prognostic value of cCLP was compared with IL-6, CRP, LDH, procalcitonin, and the 4C-mortality score by AUROC analysis., Results: For the 136 COVID-19 patients, cCLP levels were higher compared to the respective control populations, with significantly higher cCLP levels in serum and heparin than in EDTA or citrate. Higher cCLP levels were obtained for COVID-19 patients with i) severe/critical illness (n = 70), ii) ICU admission (n = 66) and iii) need for mechanical ventilation/ECMO (n = 25), but iv) not in patients who deceased within 30 days (n = 41). The highest discriminatory power (AUC [95% CI]) for each defined outcome was i) CRP (0.835 [0.755-0.914]); ii) EDTA cCLP (0.780 [0.688-0.873]); iii) EDTA cCLP (0.842 [0.758-0.925]) and iv) the 4C-mortality score (0.713 [0.608-0.818])., Conclusion: Measuring cCLP in COVID-19 patients helps the clinician to predict the clinical course of COVID-19. The discriminatory power of EDTA and citrate plasma cCLP levels often outperforms heparin plasma cCLP levels., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is the most common systemic autoimmune disease and also the most severe arthritic disorder. The measurement of rheumatoid factor (RF) and anti-citrullinated protein antibodies (ACPA) in serum supports the diagnosis of RA, which gained increasing significance over the last 65 years. However, a high variability between RF and ACPA methods has been described, impacting the diagnostic performance of the current ACR/EULAR RA classification criteria. The great number of commercially available assays, often lacking traceability to an international standard, is a major factor attributing to this in-between assay variability. The adoption of an international standard for ACPA, as is since long available for rheumatoid factor, is therefore highly desirable. Further harmonization in clinical interpretation of RF/ACPA assays could be obtained by harmonization of the cut-offs, for both the low and high antibody levels, based on predefined specificity in disease controls. Reporting test result specific likelihood ratios (LR) adds value in the interpretation of autoantibody tests. However, a good understanding of the control population used to define antibody test result interval-associated LRs is crucial in defining the diagnostic performance characteristics of antibody serology. Finally, specificity in RA classification can be improved by refining serological weight scoring taking into account the nature of the antibody, the antibody level and double RF + ACPA positivity., Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (© 2022 The Authors.)

Background: Calprotectin (CLP) is a promising biomarker for the evaluation of neutrophil-related inflammation. Our aim was to establish reference values for circulating CLP in different sample types and to study the effect of pre-analytical variables., Methods: Reference values were determined in 100 healthy individuals. Pre-analytical variables were evaluated in 10 healthy controls and four rheumatoid arthritis patients with active disease and covered sample type (serum with/without gel separator, heparin, EDTA and citrate plasma), pre-centrifugation time (<2 h, 6 h, 24 h), storage condition (2-8 °C, 18-25 °C, 30 °C) and storage time (24 h, 72 h, 7 days). CLP measurements were performed with the EliA™Calprotectin 2 assay on Phadia™200 (Thermo Fisher Scientific)., Results: In healthy controls, baseline CLP concentrations in serum were more than double the concentration in EDTA and citrate plasma (0.909 µg/mL versus 0.259 µg/mL and 0.261 µg/mL respectively). Heparin, EDTA and citrate stabilized CLP concentrations for up to 6 h before centrifugation, whereas significant increases in CLP levels were observed when serum was left untreated during that time period., Conclusion: Clinical studies on circulating CLP need to apply sample type-specific reference values and decision limits. To obtain reproducible CLP results in serum, more stringent pre-analytical sample handling instructions are needed., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Analytical validation of newly released SARS-CoV-2 antibody assays in the clinical laboratory is crucial to ensure sufficient performance in respect to its intended use. We aimed to assess analytical and diagnostic performance of 8 (semi-)quantitative assays detecting anti-nucleocapsid IgG (Euroimmun, Id-Vet) or total Ig (Roche), anti-spike protein IgG (Euroimmun, Theradiag, DiaSorin, Thermo Fisher) or both (Theradiag) and 2 rapid lateral flow assays (LFA) (AAZ-LMB and Theradiag)., Methods: Specificity was evaluated using a cross-reactivity panel of 85 pre-pandemic serum samples. Sensitivity was determined at both the manufacturer's and a 95% specificity cut-off level, using 81 serum samples of patients with a positive rRT-PCR. Sensitivity was determined in function of time post symptoms onset., Results: Specificity for all assays ranged from 92.9% to 100% (Roche and Thermo Fisher) with the exception of the Theradiag IgM LFA (82.4%). Sensitivity in asymptomatic patients ranged between 41.7% and 58.3%. Sensitivity on samples taken <10 days since symptom onset was low (23.3%-66.7%) and increased on samples taken between 10 and 20 days and > 20 days since symptom onset (80%-96% and 92.9%-100%, respectively). From 20 days after symptom onset, the Roche, Id-vet and Thermo Fisher assays all met the sensitivity (>95%) and specificity (>97%) targets determined by the WHO. Antibody signal response was significantly higher in the critically ill patient group., Conclusion: Antibody detection can complement rRT-PCR for the diagnosis of COVID-19, especially in the later stage, or in asymptomatic patients for epidemiological purposes. Addition of IgM in LFAs did not improve sensitivity., (Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: Currently available computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) systems for the detection of anti-nuclear antibodies (ANA) by indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) assay enable a standardized measurement of system-specific fluorescent intensity (FI) measures. We aimed to evaluate an internal quality control (iQC) program that controls the total ANA IIF process in routine practice., Methods: In addition to the kit iQC materials, supplemental quality indicators were integrated in a total quality assurance (QA) program: patient-derived iQC's samples (negative, 1/160 fine speckled and 1/160 homogeneous), median sample FI per run and percentage of ANA IIF positive samples per run. Analytical rejection criteria were based on the imprecision of the positivity index (PI) measure of the Zenit PRO system (Menarini). Clinical rejection criteria were based on changes in FI that correspond to a change in ANA IIF titer of ≥2. To evaluate the QA program, different artificial errors were introduced during the ANA IIF process. After every run, quality indicators were evaluated and compared to the pre-set target values., Results: Rescanning the ANA IIF slides five times, using an old conjugate and a needle obstruction resulted in analytically and even clinically relevant errors in ANA IIF results. All errors were correctly detected by the different defined quality indicators. Traditional Westgard rules, including analytically (and clinically) defined rejection limits were useful in monitoring quality indicators., Conclusions: The integration of a total process iQC program in CAD systems, based on the specific FI measurands and performance criteria of the system, adds value to QA., (© 2021 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston.)

Background: The International Consensus on Antinuclear Antibody (ANA) Patterns (ICAP) has recently proposed nomenclature in order to harmonize ANA indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) pattern reporting. ICAP distinguishes competent-level from expert-level patterns. A survey was organized to evaluate reporting, familiarity, and considered clinical value of ANA IIF patterns., Methods: Two surveys were distributed by European Autoimmunity Standardization Initiative (EASI) working groups, the International Consensus on ANA Patterns (ICAP) and UK NEQAS to laboratory professionals and clinicians., Results: 438 laboratory professionals and 248 clinicians from 67 countries responded. Except for dense fine speckled (DFS), the nuclear competent patterns were reported by > 85% of the laboratories. Except for rods and rings, the cytoplasmic competent patterns were reported by > 72% of laboratories. Cytoplasmic IIF staining was considered ANA positive by 55% of clinicians and 62% of laboratory professionals, with geographical and expertise-related differences. Quantification of fluorescence intensity was considered clinically relevant for nuclear patterns, but less so for cytoplasmic and mitotic patterns. Combining IIF with specific extractable nuclear antigens (ENA)/dsDNA antibody testing was considered most informative. Of the nuclear competent patterns, the centromere and homogeneous pattern obtained the highest scores for clinical relevance and the DFS pattern the lowest. Of the cytoplasmic patterns, the reticular/mitochondria-like pattern obtained the highest scores for clinical relevance and the polar/Golgi-like and rods and rings patterns the lowest., Conclusion: This survey confirms that the major nuclear and cytoplasmic ANA IIF patterns are considered clinically important. There is no unanimity on classifying DFS, rods and rings and polar/Golgi-like as a competent pattern and on reporting cytoplasmic patterns as ANA IIF positive.

Background: The clinical presentation of celiac disease (CD) varies between children. The objective of this study was to document the pre-test probability for CD based on symptoms and routine laboratory test and to evaluate the performance of two IgA anti-tissue transglutaminase (tTG) assays. We critically reviewed the concept of using multiples of the manufacturer's upper limit of normal (ULN), as proposed in the ESPGHAN guidelines (if IgA tTG is >10 times ULN, no biopsy is needed)., Methods: The retrospective study included 91 children with newly diagnosed CD and 605 controls (<16 years). All underwent upper endoscopy with small bowel biopsies. Four laboratory parameters and 16 symptoms were registered. All patients were tested for IgA anti-tTG antibodies with assays from Inova Diagnostics and Thermo Fisher Scientific., Results: Some combinations of clinical symptoms and laboratory parameters had a high pre-test probability for CD, such as (combinations of) anorexia, failure to thrive, low ferritin level and elevated AST. The diagnostic performance of both IgA anti-tTG assays was excellent and comparable (no difference in ROC curve area under the curve). At a threshold that corresponds to a specificity of 100% (5 times ULN for Inova Diagnostics and 2 times ULN for Thermo Fisher), the sensitivity was 82% for both assays. At the 10 times ULN threshold, the sensitivity differed between the assays (77% vs. 57%), indicating that such threshold does not completely align interpretation across companies., Conclusions: Our study showed that some combinations of symptoms and aberrant laboratory parameters had a high pre-test probability. The use of the ESPGHAN non-biopsy approach could reduce small bowel biopsies, but thresholds for IgA-tTG levels are not aligned across assays and should be based on predefined likelihood ratios or specificity., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest PV is a senior clinical investigator of the Fund for Scientific Research – Flanders. XB has been consultant for Inova Diagnostics and Thermo Fisher., (Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Background There is a need for additional biomarkers to assist in the diagnosis and prognosis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The aim of our study was to evaluate the (pre-analytical, analytical and clinical) performance of serum calprotectin as a marker of inflammation in RA. Methods The study population included 463 rheumatologic patients (including 111 RA patients and 352 controls) who for the first time consulted a rheumatologist, 20 healthy controls and 27 patients with an infectious disease. Calprotectin was measured (using four different assays) in serum or in serum and EDTA plasma (healthy controls and infectious disease group). For rheumatologic patients, results for C-reactive protein (CRP), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), rheumatoid factor (RF) and anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibody (ACPA) were available. Results Results for blood calprotectin were assay- and matrix-dependent, with higher values found in serum than in plasma. Serum calprotectin was higher in RA patients than in rheumatologic diseased controls and in healthy controls. Serum calprotectin was lower in RA patients than in patients with an infectious disease. Serum calprotectin was associated with disease activity (DAS score). The area under the curve (AUC) to discriminate RA from controls was 0.756 for CRP, 0.714 for ESR and 0.726-0.783 for calprotectin. Conclusions Our data document that calprotectin measurement is assay- and matrix-dependent. Serum calprotectin is associated with disease activity. Additional (prospective) studies are warranted to further evaluate the prognostic and diagnostic value of blood calprotectin measurements.

Background The introduction of automated anti-nuclear antibody (ANA) indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) analysis may allow for more harmonized ANA IIF reporting, provided that a thorough quality assurance program controls this process. The aim of this study was to evaluate various quality indicators used for ANA IIF analysis with the final goal of optimizing the iQC program. Methods In an experimental setup, we introduced artificial errors, mimicking plausible problems during routine practice on a QUANTA-Lyser-NOVA View® system (Inova Diagnostics, San Diego, CA, USA). Predetermined quality indicators were evaluated against predefined acceptance criteria. In addition, we retrospectively investigated the applicability of the selected quality indicators in the daily routine practice during three pre-defined periods. Results Both the experimental as the retrospective study revealed that pre-analytical, analytical and post-analytical errors were not highlighted by company internal quality control (iQC) materials. The use of patient derived iQC samples, median fluorescence intensity results per run and the percentage of positive ANA IIF results as additional quality indicators ensured a more adequate ANA IIF quality assurance. Furthermore, negative and moderate positive sample iQC materials merit clinical validation, as titer changes of >1 correspond to clinically important shifts. Traditional Westgard rules, including a clinically defined stop limit, revealed to be useful in monitoring of the supplemental quality indicators. Conclusions A thorough ANA IIF quality assurance for daily routine practice necessitates the addition of supplemental quality indicators in combination with well-defined acceptance criteria.