Back to Search Start Over

Multicentre study to improve clinical interpretation of rheumatoid factor and anti-citrullinated protein/peptide antibodies test results.

Authors :
Van Hoovels L
Vander Cruyssen B
Sieghart D
Bonroy C
Nagy E
Pullerits R
Čučnik S
Dahle C
Heijnen I
Bernasconi L
Benkhadra F
Bogaert L
Van Den Bremt S
Van Liedekerke A
Vanheule G
Robbrecht J
Studholme L
Wirth C
Müller R
Kyburz D
Sjöwall C
Kastbom A
Ješe R
Jovancevic B
Kiss E
Jacques P
Aletaha D
Steiner G
Verschueren P
Bossuyt X
Source :
RMD open [RMD Open] 2022 Mar; Vol. 8 (1).
Publication Year :
2022

Abstract

Background: Rheumatoid factor (RF) and anti-citrullinated protein/peptide antibodies (ACPA) are important biomarkers for diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). However, there is poor harmonisation of RF and ACPA assays. The aim of this study was to refine RF and ACPA interpretation across commercial assays.<br />Materials and Methods: Six total RF isotype-non-specific assays, 3 RF IgM isotype-specific assays and 9 ACPA immunoglobulin G assays of 13 different companies were evaluated using 398 diagnostic samples from patients with RA and 1073 disease controls.<br />Results: Using cut-offs proposed by the manufacturer, there was a large variability in diagnostic sensitivity and specificity between assays. Thresholds of antibody levels were determined based on predefined specificities and used to define test result intervals. Test result interval-specific likelihood ratios (LRs) were concordant across the different RF and ACPA assays. For all assays, the LR for RA increased with increasing antibody level. Higher LRs were found for ACPA than for RF. ACPA levels associated with LRs >80 were found in a substantial fraction (>22%) of patients with RA.<br />Conclusion: Defining thresholds for antibody levels and assigning test result interval-specific LRs allows alignment of clinical interpretation for all RF and ACPA assays.<br />Competing Interests: Competing interests: XB, LVH, GS and DS have received speaker fees from and have been a consultant for Thermo Fisher Scientific. LBernasconi and IH have received speaker fees from Thermo Fisher Scientific. DA and PJ are editorial board members of RMD Open. All participating diagnostic companies in-kind supported with RF/ACPA assays and technical training: Thermo Fisher Scientific, Uppsala, Sweden; Cambridge Life Science, Ely, UK; Ortho-Clinical Diagnostics, Raritan, New Jersey, USA; Diagam, Ghislenghien, Belgium; Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany; Svar Life Science, Malmö, Sweden; Immunodiagnostic Systems, Tyne and Wear, UK; Orgentec, Mainz, Germany; Abbott, Wiesbaden, Germany; Euroimmun, Lübeck, Germany; Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, California, USA; and Siemens Healthineers, Sudbury, UK.<br /> (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
2056-5933
Volume :
8
Issue :
1
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
RMD open
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
35321875
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1136/rmdopen-2021-002099