Search

Abstract: The level of frailty, according to the International Myeloma Working Group frailty index, is highly dynamic during antimyeloma treatment. Dynamic frailty assessment improved the prediction of survival and early mortality compared with the prognostic value of static frailty level at baseline., (© 2025 American Society of Hematology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights are reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.)

We present a patient at risk of misdiagnosis with multiple myeloma due to pseudohypercalcemia. Examinations showed monoclonal protein, 50% monoclonal plasma cells in bone marrow, and hypercalcemia but no osteolytic bone lesions. Follow-up tests revealed pseudohypercalcemia, with elevated total calcium, but normal ionized calcium: a discrepancy due to calcium binding to monoclonal paraprotein (confirmed by laboratory experiments). Accordingly, the patient was diagnosed with smouldering myeloma. After 900 days, the presence of bone lesions prompted the start of treatment for myeloma. Consequently, monoclonal paraprotein levels declined and pseudohypercalcemia dissolved. Hence, ionized calcium should be measured in monoclonal gammopathies to avoid misdiagnosis., Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Svenja F. B. J. Mennens et al.)

Competing Interests: Kazimierz Groen: BMS and Beigene: speakers bureau (no personal funding). Febe Smits: No conflicts of interest. Kazem Nasserinejad: No conflicts of interest. Mark‐David Levin: Support for attending meetings and/or travel: Janssen, Takeda. Josien C. Regelink: No conflicts of interest. Gert‐Jan Timmers: Participation on an Advisory Board: Novartis; Travel, Accommodations, Expenses; Novartis, Janssen. Esther G. M. de Waal: No conflicts of interest. Matthijs Westerman: No conflicts of interest. Gerjo A. Velders: No conflicts of interest. Koen de Heer: No conflicts of interest. Rineke B. L. Leys: No conflicts of interest. Roel J. W. van Kampen: No conflicts of interest. Claudia A. M. Stege: Speaker's Bureau: Sanofi, Celgene/Bristol Myers Squibb, Takeda; Consulting or Advisory Role: Sanofi, Janssen. Maarten R. Seefat: No conflicts of interest. Inger S. Nijhof: Payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, or educational events: Janssen, Celgene/Bristol Myers Squibb, Sanofi. Ellen van der Spek: Payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing or educational events: Janssen. Saskia K. Klein: No conflicts of interest. Niels W. C. J. van de Donk: Consulting or Advisory Role: Janssen, Celgene, Bristol Myers Squibb, Novartis, Amgen, Servier, Takeda, Bayer, Roche, Pfizer, Abbvie, Adaptive (no personal funding); Research Funding: Janssen, Celgene, Amgen, Novartis, Bristol Myers Squibb, Cellectis. Paula F. Ypma: Payment or honoraria for presentations: Janssen; Support for attending meetings and/or travel: Janssen. Sonja Zweegman: Consulting or Advisory Role: Janssen‐Cilag, Takeda, Celgene/Bristol Myers Squibb, Sanofi, Oncopeptides (no personal funding); Research Funding: Janssen, Takeda.

In this retrospective international multicenter study, we describe the clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and related disorders (small lymphocytic lymphoma and high-count monoclonal B lymphocytosis) infected by SARS-CoV-2, including the development of post-COVID condition. Data from 1540 patients with CLL infected by SARS-CoV-2 from January 2020 to May 2022 were included in the analysis and assigned to four phases based on cases disposition and SARS-CoV-2 variants emergence. Post-COVID condition was defined according to the WHO criteria. Patients infected during the most recent phases of the pandemic, though carrying a higher comorbidity burden, were less often hospitalized, rarely needed intensive care unit admission, or died compared to patients infected during the initial phases. The 4-month overall survival (OS) improved through the phases, from 68% to 83%, p = .0015. Age, comorbidity, CLL-directed treatment, but not vaccination status, emerged as risk factors for mortality. Among survivors, 6.65% patients had a reinfection, usually milder than the initial one, and 16.5% developed post-COVID condition. The latter was characterized by fatigue, dyspnea, lasting cough, and impaired concentration. Infection severity was the only risk factor for developing post-COVID. The median time to resolution of the post-COVID condition was 4.7 months. OS in patients with CLL improved during the different phases of the pandemic, likely due to the improvement of prophylactic and therapeutic measures against SARS-CoV-2 as well as the emergence of milder variants. However, mortality remained relevant and a significant number of patients developed post-COVID conditions, warranting further investigations., (© 2023 The Authors. American Journal of Hematology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Patients with lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma/Waldenström macroglobulinemia (LPL/WM) occasionally develop diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). This mostly results from LPL/WM transformation, although clonally unrelated DLBCL can also arise. LPL/WM is characterized by activating MYD88 L265P (>95%) and CXCR4 mutations (~30%), but the genetic drivers of transformation remain to be identified. Here, in thirteen LPL/WM patients who developed DLBCL, the clonal relationship of LPL and DLBCL together with mutations contributing to transformation were investigated. In 2 LPL/WM patients (15%), high-throughput sequencing of immunoglobulin gene rearrangements showed evidence of >1 clonal B-cell population in LPL tissue biopsies. In the majority of LPL/WM patients, DLBCL presentations were clonally related to the dominant clone in LPL, providing evidence of transformation. However, in 3 patients (23%), DLBCL was clonally unrelated to the major malignant B-cell clone in LPL, of which 2 patients developed de novo DLBCL. In this study cohort, LPL displayed MYD88 L265P mutation in 8 out of eleven patients analyzed (73%), while CXCR4 mutations were observed in 6 cases (55%). MYD88 WT LPL biopsies present in 3 patients (27%) were characterized by CD79B and TNFAIP3 mutations. Upon transformation, DLBCL acquired novel mutations targeting BTG1, BTG2, CD79B, CARD11, TP53, and PIM1 . Together, we demonstrate variable clonal B-cell dynamics in LPL/WM patients developing DLBCL, and the occurrence of clonally unrelated DLBCL in about one-quarter of LPL/WM patients. Moreover, we identified commonly mutated genes upon DLBCL transformation, which together with preserved mutations already present in LPL characterize the mutational landscape of DLBCL occurrences in LPL/WM patients., Competing Interests: The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose., (Copyright © 2023 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the European Hematology Association.)

Despite high cure rates in classic Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL), relapses are observed. Whether relapsed cHL represents second primary lymphoma or an underlying T-cell lymphoma (TCL) mimicking cHL is underinvestigated. To analyze the nature of cHL recurrences, in-depth clonality testing of immunoglobulin (Ig) and T-cell receptor (TCR) rearrangements was performed in paired cHL diagnoses and recurrences among 60 patients, supported by targeted mutation analysis of lymphoma-associated genes. Clonal Ig rearrangements were detected by next-generation sequencing (NGS) in 69 of 120 (58%) diagnoses and recurrence samples. The clonal relationship could be established in 34 cases, identifying clonally related relapsed cHL in 24 of 34 patients (71%). Clonally unrelated cHL was observed in 10 of 34 patients (29%) as determined by IG-NGS clonality assessment and confirmed by the identification of predominantly mutually exclusive gene mutations in the paired cHL samples. In recurrences of >2 years, ∼60% of patients with cHL for whom the clonal relationship could be established showed a second primary cHL. Clonal TCR gene rearrangements were identified in 14 of 125 samples (11%), and TCL-associated gene mutations were detected in 7 of 14 samples. Retrospective pathology review with integration of the molecular findings were consistent with an underlying TCL in 5 patients aged >50 years. This study shows that cHL recurrences, especially after 2 years, sometimes represent a new primary cHL or TCL mimicking cHL, as uncovered by NGS-based Ig/TCR clonality testing and gene mutation analysis. Given the significant therapeutic consequences, molecular testing of a presumed relapse in cHL is crucial for subsequent appropriate treatment strategies adapted to the specific lymphoma presentation., (© 2023 by The American Society of Hematology. Licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), permitting only noncommercial, nonderivative use with attribution. All other rights reserved.)

Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL)-related symptoms and morbidity related to the advanced age at diagnosis impairs the well-being of older adult patients. Therefore, it is essential to tailor treatment according to geriatric characteristics and aim for an improvement in health-related quality of life (HRQoL) as a primary treatment goal. In the HOVON139/GiVe trial, 12 cycles of fixed-duration venetoclax plus obinutuzumab (Ven-O) were shown to be effective and tolerable in FCR (fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, rituximab)-unfit patients with CLL (n = 67). However, prolonged venetoclax exposure as consolidation treatment led to increased toxicity with limited effect on minimal residual disease. To assess the impact of geriatric assessment on treatment outcomes and the patients' HRQoL, patient-reported outcomes (PROs), including function, depression, cognition, nutrition, physical performance, muscle parameters, comorbidities, and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer C30 and CLL17 questionnaires were assessed. At baseline, geriatric impairments were present in >90% of patients and ≥2 impairments present in 60% of patients predicted grade ≥3 nonhematological toxicity. During treatment, the number of geriatric impairments diminished significantly and clinically relevant improvements in HRQoL subscales were reached for global health status, physical functioning, role functioning, emotional functioning, fatigue, dyspnea, physical condition or fatigue, and worries or fears related to health and functioning. These improvements were comparable for patients receiving venetoclax consolidation and patients in whom treatment could mostly be discontinued. Collectively, frontline fixed-duration Ven-O improves overall PROs in older, unfit patients with CLL with and without geriatric impairments. This study was registered at EudraCT as 2015-004985-27 and the Netherlands Trial Register as NTR6043., (© 2023 by The American Society of Hematology.)

Competing Interests: FHS: Grants or contracts from Celgene, Janssen, Oncopeptides, Sanofi, GSK Targovax. Payments or honoraria for lectures/presentations/speakers bureus/article writing or educational events: Amgen, BMS, Takeda, Abbvie, Janssen, Novartis, SkyliteDX, Oncopeptides, Sanofi, Pfizer, Daiki-Sankyo, GSK. Participation on a Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board: Abbvie, GSK, Celgene, Takeda, Janssen, Oncopeptides, Sanofi, BMS. MH: Royalties of payments for lectures: Janssen, BMS, Pfizer. EvdS: Royalties for lectures Janssen. PFY: Royalties of payments for lectures/article preparations/etc: Janssen and Amgen: participation in a company sponsored speakers’ bureau. UHM: Employment/Consultation: Advisory boards: Amgen, Sanofi, Pfizer. Royalties of payments for lectures/article preparations/etc: Lecture honoraria: Amgen, Janssen, BMS, Sanofi, GSK. NWCJvdD: Research support from Janssen Pharmaceuticals, AMGEN, Celgene, Novartis, Cellectis and BMS, and serves in advisory boards for Janssen Pharmaceuticals, AMGEN, Celgene, BMS, Takeda, Roche, Novartis, Bayer, Adaptive, and Servier. PS: Consulting or Advisory Role: Celgene, Janssen, Amgen, Karyopharm Therapeutics, CARsgen Therapeutics, Pfizer. Research Funding: Janssen, Amgen, BMS/Celgene. NA: Research grant, honorarium and advisory board, Takeda. SZ: Consulting or Advisory Role: Janssen-Cilag, Takeda, Celgene/Bristol Myers Squibb, Sanofi, Oncopeptides (no personal funding). Research Funding: Janssen, Takeda. All the other authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Background: The outcome of non-transplant eligible newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) patients is heterogeneous, partly depending on frailty level. The aim of this study was to prospectively investigate the efficacy and safety of Ixazomib-Daratumumab-low-dose dexamethasone (Ixa-Dara-dex) in NDMM intermediate-fit patients., Methods: In this phase II multicenter HOVON-143 study, IMWG Frailty index based intermediate-fit patients, were treated with 9 induction cycles of Ixa-Dara-dex, followed by maintenance with ID for a maximum of 2 years. The primary endpoint was overall response rate on induction treatment. Patients were included from October 2017 until May 2019. Trial Registration Number: NTR6297., Findings: Sixty-five patients were included. Induction therapy resulted in an overall response rate of 71%. Early mortality was 1.5%. At a median follow-up of 41.0 months, median progression-free survival (PFS) was 18.2 months and 3-year overall survival 83%. Discontinuation of therapy occurred in 77% of patients, 49% due to progression, 9% due to toxicity, 8% due to incompliance, 3% due to sudden death and 8% due to other reasons. Dose modifications of ixazomib were required frequently (37% and 53% of patients during induction and maintenance, respectively), mainly due to, often low grade, polyneuropathy. During maintenance 23% of patients received daratumumab alone. Global quality of life (QoL) improved significantly and was clinically relevant, which persisted during maintenance treatment., Interpretation: Ixazomib-Daratumumab-low-dose dexamethasone as first line treatment in intermediate-fit NDMM patients is safe and improves global QoL. However, efficacy was limited, partly explained by ixazomib-induced toxicity, hampering long term tolerability of this 3-drug regimen. This highlights the need for more efficacious and tolerable regimens improving the outcome in vulnerable intermediate-fit patients., Funding: Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited., Competing Interests: Claudia Stege. Speaker's Bureau: Sanofi, Celgene/Bristol Myers Squibb, Takeda. Consulting or Advisory Role: Sanofi, Janssen. Marie-Christiane Vekemans. Payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing or educational events: Amgen, Janssen, Takeda, Bristol Myers Squibb/Celgene. Consulting or Advisory Role: Amgen, Celgene-Bristol Myers Squibb, Janssen, Takeda, Sanofi, Pfizer, GlaxoSmithKline, Menarini. Ka-Lung Wu. Consulting or Advisory Role: Pfizer, Janssen, Bristol Myers Squibb. Niels W. C. J. van de Donk. Consulting or Advisory Role: Janssen, Celgene, Bristol Myers Squibb, Novartis, Amgen, Servier, Takeda, Bayer, Roche, Pfizer, Abbvie, Adaptive. Research Funding: Janssen, Celgene, Amgen, Novartis, Bristol Myers Squibb, Cellectis. Gert Jan Timmers. Participation on an Advisory Board: Novartis. Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: Novartis, Janssen. Ellen van der Spek. Payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing or educational events: Janssen. Pieter Sonneveld. Participation on a Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board: Celgene, Janssen, Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Karyopharm Therapeutics, Pfizer. Research Funding: Janssen, Amgen, Bristol Myeres Squibb/Celgene, Karyopharm Therapeutics, Pfizer. Inger S. Nijhof. Payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing or educational events: Janssen, Celgene/Bristol Myers Squibb, Sanofi. Mark-David Levin. Support for attending meetings and/or travel: Janssen, Takeda. Paula F. Ypma. Payment or honoraria for presentations: Janssen. Support for attending meetings and/or travel: Janssen. Sonja Zweegman. Consulting or Advisory Role: Janssen-Cilag, Takeda, Celgene/Bristol Myers Squibb, Sanofi, Oncopeptides (no personal funding). Research Funding: Janssen, Takeda. No other potential conflicts of interest were reported., (© 2023 The Author(s).)

Aims: Large B cell lymphoma with IRF4 rearrangement (LBCL-IRF4) is a new entity in the 2017 revised World Health Organisation (WHO) classification that was initially mainly reported in children. After identification of a 79-year-old patient, we assessed how often IRF4 rearrangements can be detected in adult diffuse large B cell lymphomas (DLBCLs) which have to be reclassified to LBCL-IRF4 based on fluorescence in-situ hybridisation (FISH) for IRF4., Methods and Results: With FISH, we studied the presence of IRF4 rearrangements in 238 lymphomas that were diagnosed as DLBCL according to the previous WHO classification of 2008., Conclusions: In addition to the index patient, an IRF4 rearrangement was detected in another five of 237 patients (2%). The immunohistochemical profile of these five IRF4 rearranged lymphomas was consistent with previous reports of LBCL-IRF4. One case was recognised to represent transformation of follicular lymphoma rather than de-novo LBCL-IRF4. BCL6 rearrangements were found in two cases of LBCL-IRF4; BCL2 and MYC rearrangements were excluded. Patients presented with limited stage disease with involvement of the head and neck in three patients, and involvement of the lung and thyroid in two others. This study shows that, although rare, LBCL-IRF4 should also be considered in older patients and at localisations other than the head and neck region., (© 2023 The Authors. Histopathology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Approximately one-third of patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) relapse and often require salvage chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation. In most cases, the clonal relationship between the first diagnosis and subsequent relapse is not assessed, thereby potentially missing the identification of second primary lymphoma. In this study, the clonal relationship of 59 paired DLBCL diagnoses and recurrences was established by next-generation sequencing-based detection of immunoglobulin gene rearrangements. Among 50 patients with interpretable results, 43 patients (86%) developed clonally related relapsed disease. This was observed in 100% of early recurrences (<2 years), 80% of the recurrences with an interval between 2 and 5 years, and 73% of late recurrences (≥5 years). On the other hand, 7 (14%) out of 50 patients displayed different dominant clonotypes in primary DLBCL and clinical recurrences, confirming the occurrence of second primary DLBCL; 37% of DLBCL recurrences that occurred ≥4 years after diagnosis were shown to be second primary lymphomas. The clonally unrelated cases were Epstein-Barr virus positive in 43% of the cases, whereas this was only 5% in the relapsed DLBCL cases. In conclusion, next-generation sequencing-based clonality testing in late recurrences should be considered in routine diagnostics to distinguish relapse from second primary lymphoma, as this latter group of patients with DLBCL may benefit from less-intensive treatment strategies., (Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Management of patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is changing due to considerable advances in the therapeutic armamentarium, and new therapies will possibly continue to emerge in the near future. Therefore, the CLL working group of the Dutch-Belgium Haemato-Oncology Cooperative Group for Adults in the Netherlands (HOVON) necessitated revising the Dutch CLL guidelines. The current guideline is based on the expert opinion of the HOVON CLL working group members and focusses on well-designed clinical trials taking into account efficacy with special emphasis on toxicity, treatment duration and treatment intensity. This article provides recommendations on diagnosis, treatment strategies in front-line and relapsed setting and provides supportive care measurements during novel-based therapies as well as for infectious CLL-related complications. The recommendations presented here are intended to provide guidance for the management of CLL patients in the Netherlands, and take into account the availability of treatment strategies at the time of this publication.

Background: Patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) may be more susceptible to COVID-19 related poor outcomes, including thrombosis and death, due to the advanced age, the presence of comorbidities, and the disease and treatment-related immune deficiency. The aim of this study was to assess the risk of thrombosis and bleeding in patients with CLL affected by severe COVID-19., Methods: This is a retrospective multicenter study conducted by ERIC, the European Research Initiative on CLL, including patients from 79 centers across 22 countries. Data collection was conducted between April and May 2021. The COVID-19 diagnosis was confirmed by the real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) assay for SARS-CoV-2 on nasal or pharyngeal swabs. Severe cases of COVID-19 were defined by hospitalization and the need of oxygen or admission into ICU. Development and type of thrombotic events, presence and severity of bleeding complications were reported during treatment for COVID-19. Bleeding events were classified using ISTH definition. STROBE recommendations were used in order to enhance reporting., Results: A total of 793 patients from 79 centers were included in the study with 593 being hospitalized (74.8%). Among these, 511 were defined as having severe COVID: 162 were admitted to the ICU while 349 received oxygen supplementation outside the ICU. Most patients (90.5%) were receiving thromboprophylaxis. During COVID-19 treatment, 11.1% developed a thromboembolic event, while 5.0% experienced bleeding. Thrombosis developed in 21.6% of patients who were not receiving thromboprophylaxis, in contrast to 10.6% of patients who were on thromboprophylaxis. Bleeding episodes were more frequent in patients receiving intermediate/therapeutic versus prophylactic doses of low-molecular-weight heparin (LWMH) (8.1% vs. 3.8%, respectively) and in elderly. In multivariate analysis, peak D-dimer level and C-reactive protein to albumin ratio were poor prognostic factors for thrombosis occurrence (OR = 1.022, 95%CI 1.007‒1.038 and OR = 1.025, 95%CI 1.001‒1.051, respectively), while thromboprophylaxis use was protective (OR = 0.199, 95%CI 0.061‒0.645). Age and LMWH intermediate/therapeutic dose administration were prognostic factors in multivariate model for bleeding (OR = 1.062, 95%CI 1.017-1.109 and OR = 2.438, 95%CI 1.023-5.813, respectively)., Conclusions: Patients with CLL affected by severe COVID-19 are at a high risk of thrombosis if thromboprophylaxis is not used, but also at increased risk of bleeding under the LMWH intermediate/therapeutic dose administration., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) represents the most common form of non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) that is still incurable in a large fraction of patients. Tetraspanin CD37 is highly expressed on mature B lymphocytes, and multiple CD37-targeting therapies are under clinical development for NHL. However, CD37 expression is nondetectable in ∼50% of DLBCL patients, which correlates with inferior treatment outcome, but the underlying mechanisms for differential CD37 expression in DLBCL are still unknown. Here, we investigated the regulation of the CD37 gene in human DLBCL at the (epi-)genetic and transcriptional level. No differences were observed in DNA methylation within the CD37 promoter region between CD37-positive and CD37-negative primary DLBCL patient samples. On the contrary, CD37-negative DLBCL cells specifically lacked CD37 promoter activity, suggesting differential regulation of CD37 gene expression. Using an unbiased quantitative proteomic approach, we identified transcription factor IRF8 to be significantly higher expressed in nuclear extracts of CD37-positive as compared with CD37-negative DLBCL. Direct binding of IRF8 to the CD37 promoter region was confirmed by DNA pulldown assay combined with mass spectrometry and targeted chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP). Functional analysis indicated that IRF8 overexpression enhanced CD37 protein expression, while CRISPR/Cas9 knockout of IRF8 decreased CD37 levels in DLBCL cell lines. Immunohistochemical analysis in a large cohort of primary DLBCL (n = 206) revealed a significant correlation of IRF8 expression with detectable CD37 levels. Together, this study provides new insight into the molecular mechanisms underlying differential CD37 expression in human DLBCL and reveals IRF8 as a transcriptional regulator of CD37 in B-cell lymphoma., (© 2022 by The American Society of Hematology. Licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), permitting only noncommercial, nonderivative use with attribution. All other rights reserved.)

Background: Fixed-duration 12 cycles of venetoclax plus obinutuzumab is established as first-line treatment for patients with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia. We aimed to determine the activity and safety of 12 cycles of venetoclax consolidation after fixed-duration venetoclax plus obinutuzumab for previously untreated patients with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia who were unfit for fludarabine-based treatment, and whether this could be guided by minimal residual disease status., Methods: We conducted an open-label, randomised, parallel-group, phase 2 trial (HOVON 139/GiVe) at 25 hospitals in the Netherlands. Eligible patients were aged 18 years or older with previously untreated chronic lymphocytic leukaemia, had an ECOG performance status of 0-2, and were unfit for fludarabine-based treatment. All patients received two debulking cycles of intravenous obinutuzumab (100 mg on day 1, 900 mg on day 2, and 1000 mg on days 8, 15, and day 1 of cycle two), followed by fixed-duration venetoclax plus obinutuzumab for 12 cycles (six cycles of intravenous obinutuzumab 1000 mg on day 1 and 12 during 28-day cycles of oral venetoclax, starting with a 5-week ramp-up and then 400 mg once daily until completion of cycle 12). Patients were then randomly assigned (1:1) by minimal residual disease status in peripheral blood, to receive either 12 cycles of venetoclax consolidation irrespective of minimal residual disease or venetoclax consolidation only if minimal residual disease was detected at randomisation. The primary endpoint was undetectable minimal residual disease in bone marrow and no progressive disease 3 months after end of consolidation treatment (or corresponding timepoint) by intention-to-treat. Safety was assessed in all patients who received at least one dose of any study drug. This is the primary endpoint analysis of this trial, which is ongoing and is registered with EudraCT (2015-004985-27)., Findings: Between Oct 28, 2016, and May 31, 2018, 70 patients were enrolled, of whom 67 (47 [70%] men and 20 [30%] women) received fixed-duration treatment and 62 were randomly assigned to receive 12 cycles of venetoclax consolidation (n=32) or minimal residual disease-guided venetoclax consolidation (n=30; one of whom was minimal residual disease positive at randomisation). Median follow-up was 35·2 months (IQR 31·5-41·3). 16 (50% [95% CI 32-68]) of 32 patients in the consolidation group and 16 (53% [34-72]) of 30 in the minimal residual disease-guided consolidation group met the primary endpoint of undetectable minimal residual disease in bone marrow and no progressive disease. 22 (69%) of 32 patients in the venetoclax consolidation group and 11 (37%) of 30 in the minimal residual disease-guided consolidation group had any adverse event (grade 2-4; mainly infections). The most common grade 3 or worse adverse events were infection (two [6%] of 32 patients in the consolidation group and one [3%] of 30 in the minimal residual disease-guided consolidation group) and neutropenia (two [6%] and two [7%]). There were no treatment-related deaths., Interpretation: Consolidation with venetoclax 12-cycle treatment increases the duration of known side-effects and does not prevent the loss of minimal residual disease response and subsequent risk of disease relapse., Funding: F Hoffmann-La Roche., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests APK reports personal fees from AbbVie, LAVA, Genmab, Janssen, AstraZeneca, Roche/Genentech, and Bristol Myers Squibb; and research funding from AbbVie, Janssen, AstraZeneca, Roche/Genentech, and Bristol Myers Squibb. EvdS reports honoraria from Janssen and Amgen; and support for attending meetings from Janssen. JD reports research funding from Roche/Genentech. SK reports personal fees from Janssen, AbbVie, Novartis, Gilead, and Celgene; and research funding from AbbVie, Janssen, AstraZeneca, and Roche/Genentech. M-DL reports personal fees from AbbVie, Janssen, and Roche; and research funding from AbbVie, Janssen, AstraZeneca, and Roche/Genentech. SHT reports personal fees from Roche, Takeda, Incyte, Kite/Gilead, and Celgene. All other authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Identification of risk factors for early mortality (EM) in multiple myeloma (MM) patients may contribute to different therapeutic approaches in patients at risk for EM. This population-based study aimed to assess trends in EM and risk factors for EM among MM patients diagnosed in the Netherlands. All MM patients, newly diagnosed between 1989 and 2018, were identified in the Netherlands Cancer Registry. Patients were categorized into three calendar periods (1989-1998, 1999-2008, 2009-2018) and into five age groups (≤65, 66-70, 71-75, 76-80, >80 years). EM was defined as death by any cause ≤180 days post-diagnosis. We included 28,328 MM patients (median age 70 years; 55% males). EM decreased from 22% for patients diagnosed in 1989-1998 to 13% for patients diagnosed in 2009-2018 (P < 0.01) and this decrease was observed among all age groups. Exact causes of death could not be elucidated. Besides patient's age, we found that features related to a more aggressive disease presentation, and patient characteristics reflecting patients' physical condition were predictive of EM. In summary, EM decreased from 1999 onwards. Nevertheless, EM remains high, especially for patients aged >70 years. Therefore, novel strategies should be explored to improve the outcome of patients at risk for EM., (© 2021. The Author(s).)