1. Home-based lifestyle intervention for breast cancer survivors: A surprising improvement in the quality of life during the first year of COVID-19 pandemic
- Author
-
Vagnini, Denise, Natalucci, V., Moi, S., Vallorani, L., Pietrelli, A., Panico, A. R., Marini, C. F., Lucertini, F., Annibalini, G., Sisti, D., Rocchi, M. B. L., Catalano, V., Saita, Emanuela, Emili, R., Barbieri, E., Vagnini D. (ORCID:0000-0002-3796-7202), Saita E. (ORCID:0000-0003-0790-2819), Vagnini, Denise, Natalucci, V., Moi, S., Vallorani, L., Pietrelli, A., Panico, A. R., Marini, C. F., Lucertini, F., Annibalini, G., Sisti, D., Rocchi, M. B. L., Catalano, V., Saita, Emanuela, Emili, R., Barbieri, E., Vagnini D. (ORCID:0000-0002-3796-7202), and Saita E. (ORCID:0000-0003-0790-2819)
- Abstract
Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic induced an extraordinary impact on public mental health to a degree not completely understood, especially in vulnerable populations such as breast cancer (BC) survivors. In this study, we described the short- (after 3-month) and long- (after 12-month) term effects of a multidisciplinary home-based lifestyle intervention in Italian women BC survivors during the first year of COVID-19 pandemic. Materials and methods: In total, 30 Italian BC survivors with risk factors for recurrence took part in the ongoing MoviS trial (protocol: NCT04818359). Between January 2020 and January 2021, a 3-month lifestyle intervention based on psychological counseling, nutrition, and exercise was carried out. Participants were asked to fill out psychological questionnaires for the assessment of quality of life (QoL) indicators (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QoL, EORTC-QLQ-C30) and psychological health measures such as fatigue (Brief Fatigue Inventory, BFI), distress (Distress Thermometer, DT and Psychological Distress Inventory, PDI), cancer-related fatigue (Verbal Rating Scale, VRS), and mood states (Profile of Mood States Questionnaire, POMS). IBM SPSS Statistical Software version 27.0 and R Project for Statistical Computing version 4.2.1 were used to process data. All participants were assessed at four time points: T0 (baseline), T1 (3-month), and follow-up at T2 and T3 (6- and 12-month, respectively) to measure primary (quality of life indicators) and secondary (psychological health) outcomes. Friedman non parametric test and Wilcoxon signed rank test (with Bonferroni correction) were conducted to investigate the statistically significant differences in psychometric scores and between assessment times. Results: Compared to baseline (T0), at T1 most of the QoL indicators (i.e., symptoms of fatigue and general health) were improved (p < 0.017) with the exception of a worsening in participants' social functioning ability
- Published
- 2024