Search

Studies conducted primarily among European ancestry women reported 12 breast cancer predisposition genes. However, etiologic roles of these genes in breast cancer among African ancestry women have been less well-investigated.We conducted a case-control study in African American women, which included 1117 breast cancer cases and 2169 cancer-free controls, and a pooled analysis, which included 7096 cases and 8040 controls of African descent. Odds ratios of associations with breast cancer risk were estimated.Using sequence data, we identified 61 pathogenic variants in 12 breast cancer predisposition genes, including 11 pathogenic variants not yet reported in previous studies. Pooled analysis showed statistically significant associations of breast cancer risk with pathogenic variants in BRCA1, BRCA2, PALB2, ATM, CHEK2, TP53, NF1, RAD51C, and RAD51D (all P.05). The associations with BRCA1, PALB2, and RAD51D were stronger for estrogen receptor (ER)-negative than for ER-positive breast cancer (P heterogeneity.05), whereas the association with CHEK2 was stronger for ER-positive than for ER-negative breast cancer.Our study confirmed previously identified associations of breast cancer risk with BRCA1, BRCA2, PALB2, ATM, TP53, NF1, and CHEK2 and provided new evidence to extend the associations of breast cancer risk with RAD51C and RAD51D, which was identified previously in European ancestry populations, to African ancestry women.

Breast cancer survivors frequently experience anxiety and depression post-treatment. Patient-provider communication and cultural values may impact these psychological outcomes. We examined the impact of patient-provider communication and cultural values on anxiety and depression among Black breast cancer survivors.Using an observational, cross-sectional design, 351 survivors self-reported patient-provider communication (quality, confidence), cultural values (religiosity, collectivism, future time orientation), anxiety, and depression. Patients were categorized into high, moderate, and low levels of communication and cultural values. Separate linear regressions examined the effect of levels of communication and cultural values on anxiety and depression, controlling for sociodemographic variables.A subset of breast cancer survivors reported clinically significant symptoms of anxiety (40%) and depression (20%). Communication was associated with anxiety (β = -0.14, p = 0.01) and depression (β = -0.10, p = 0.04). Specifically, women reporting higher levels of communication quality/confidence reported lower levels of anxiety and depression. There was a trend towards a significant association between cultural values and depression (β = -0.09, p = 0.06).Black breast cancer survivors experience poor psychological functioning. Effective patient-provider communication may reduce anxiety and depression post-treatment.Patient-provider relationships and patient empowerment may be key components of cancer survivorship. Special attention should be paid to patient-centered communication for Black breast cancer survivors.

Purpose:Prognostic value of Oncotype DX Breast Recurrence Score (RS) in male patients with breast cancer is understudied. We evaluated associations of RS with overall mortality in male patients with breast cancer and compared it with female counterparts.Experimental Design:With a cohort of 848 male and 110,898 female patients with breast cancer identified from the National Cancer Database (2010–2014), we estimated HRs and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for overall mortality associated with RS using Cox regression models. RS was evaluated continuously, as well as by categorization following respective traditional (≤17, 18–30, and ≥31) and TAILORx (≤10, 11–25, and ≥26) cutoffs.Results:RS was positively associated with mortality in male patients (HR = 1.13; 95% CI, 1.02–1.26 per unit RS increment) up to RS > 21, after which the risk plateaued. Among female patients, mortality began to increase with RS only when RS > 23 (HR = 1.02; 95% CI, 1.01–1.02 per unit of RS increment). The intermediate- (HR = 5.37; 95% CI, 1.79–16.11) and high-risk diseases (HR = 4.28; 95% CI, 1.22–14.97) defined by TAILORx, but not traditional cutoffs established for female patients, were associated with elevated mortality risk in men even after adjustment for demographic, clinical characteristics, and treatments, except chemotherapy.Conclusions:RS is associated with mortality in male patients with breast cancer at a much lower threshold than that for female patients. Studies are needed to establish specific guidelines for RS thresholds for male patients with breast cancer.

Supplementary Table S1. Characteristics of male breast cancer patients by receipt of Oncotype DX Recurrence Score (RS) testing Supplementary Table S2. HRs (95% CI) for total mortality associated with the Recurrence Score categories among patients {less than or equal to} 50 years Supplementary Table S3. HRs (95% CI) for total mortality associated with the Recurrence Score categories among patients > 50 years Supplementary Table S4. HRs (95% CI) for total mortality associated with chemotherapy status among intermediate-risk patients by age Supplementary Table S5. HRs (95% CI) for total mortality associated with Recurrence Score categories (sensitivity analysis)

Background BRCA1 and BRCA2 (BRCA) mutation carriers face a high lifetime risk of developing ovarian cancer. Oral contraceptives are protective in this population; however, the impact of other types of contraception (e.g. intrauterine devices, implants, injections) is unknown. We undertook a matched case-control study to evaluate the relationship between type of contraception and risk of ovarian cancer among women with BRCA mutations. Methods A total of 1733 matched pairs were included in this analysis. Women were matched according to year of birth, date of study entry, country of residence, BRCA mutation type and history of breast cancer. Detailed information on hormonal, reproductive and lifestyle exposures were collected from a routinely administered questionnaire. Conditional logistic regression was used to estimate odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) associated with each contraceptive exposure. Results Ever use of any contraceptive was significantly associated with reduced risk of ovarian cancer (OR = 0.62; 95% CI 0.52–0.75; P < 0.0001), which was driven by significant inverse associations with oral contraceptives (OR = 0.66; 95% CI 0.54–0.79; P < 0.0001) and contraceptive implants (OR = 0.30; 95% CI 0.12–0.73; P = 0.008). We observed a similar effect with use of injections (OR = 0.37; 95% CI 0.10–1.38; P = 0.14), but this did not achieve significance. No significant associations were observed between patterns of intrauterine device use and risk of ovarian cancer. Conclusions These findings support a protective effect of oral contraceptives and implants on risk of ovarian cancer among women with BRCA mutations. The possible protective effect of injections requires further evaluation.

PURPOSE. To evaluate the association between obesity and the relative prevalence of tumor subtypes among Black women with breast cancer (BC). METHODS: We conducted a pooled case-only analysis of 1,793 Black women with invasive BC recruited through three existing studies in the southeastern US. Multivariable case-only polytomous logistic regression models were used to estimate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the association between obesity, measured by pre-diagnostic body mass index (BMI), and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2+ (HER2+) and triple negative BC (TNBC) subtype relative to hormone receptor (HR)+/HER2− status (referent). RESULTS. Among 359 premenopausal women, 55.4% of cases were HR+/HER2−, 20.1% were HER2+, and 24.5% were TNBC; corresponding percentages among 1,434 postmenopausal women were 59.3%, 17.0%, and 23.6%. Approximately 50–60% of both pre- and postmenopausal women were obese (BMI>30 kg/m(2)), regardless of BC subtype. We did not observe a significant association between obesity and BC subtype. Among postmenopausal women, class I obesity (BMI 35+ kg/m(2)) was not associated with the development of HER2+ BC (OR 0.69; 95% CI 0.42–1.14) or TNBC (OR 0.93; 95% CI 0.60–1.45) relative to HR+/HER2− tumors. Corresponding estimates among premenopausal women were 1.03 (95% CI 0.43–2.48) and 1.13 (95% CI 0.48–2.64). CONCLUSION. In this large study of Black women with BC, there was no evidence of heterogeneity of BMI by BC subtype.

Background: Oncotype DX recurrence score (ODX RS) is a prognostic biomarker for early-stage, node-negative, estrogen receptor–positive (ER+) breast cancer. Whether test uptake, associated factors, and the test's prognostic values differ by race/ethnicity is unknown. Methods: From the National Cancer Database, 2010–2014, we identified 227,259 early-stage ER+, node-negative breast cancer cases. Logistic regression was used to examine ODX RS uptake and associated factors among non-Hispanic White (White), non-Hispanic Black (Black), Hispanic, and Asian American patients. Cox regression was used to estimate hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for overall mortality with ODX RS by race/ethnicity. Results: White patients were more likely to receive an ODX RS test compared with Black, Hispanic, and Asian American patients (36.7%, 32.8%, 31.6%, and 35.5%, respectively; P < 0.001). Disparities persisted after adjustments for demographics, clinical characteristics, and access-to-care, with rate ratios of 0.87 (95% CI, 0.85–0.88), 0.82 (95% CI, 0.80–0.85), and 0.89 (95% CI, 0.87–0.92), respectively, for Black, Hispanic, and Asian American compared with White patients. Black patients had higher proportions of high-risk scores (≥26) compared with White, Hispanic, and Asian American patients (19.1%, 14.0%, 14.2%, and 15.6%, respectively; P < 0.0001). ODX RS was predictive for total mortality across all races/ethnicities, particularly younger patients ( Conclusions: Although ODX RS uptake and risk distribution varied by race/ethnicity, ODX RS was prognostic for mortality across groups. Impact: These findings emphasize the importance of developing strategies to increase ODX RS uptake among racial/ethnic minorities and call for more investigations on potential racial/ethnic differences in breast cancer biology. See related commentary by Wang et al., p. 704

Breast cancer is the most common cancer diagnosed in women worldwide, with approximately 5-10% of cases attributed to high penetrance hereditary breast cancer (HBC) genes. The tremendous advances in precision oncology have broadened indications for germline genetic testing to guide both systemic and surgical treatment, with increasing demand for cancer genetic services. The HBC continuum of care includes (1) identification, access, and uptake of genetic counseling and testing; (2) the delivery of genetic counseling and testing services; and (3) initiation of guideline-adherent follow-up care and family communication of results. Challenges to delivering care on the HBC care continuum include factors such as access to services, cost, discrimination and bias, and lack of education and awareness, which can be mitigated through implementing a multi-level approach. This includes strategies such as increasing awareness and utilization of genetic counseling and testing, developing new methods to meet the growing demand for genetic services, and improving the uptake of follow-up care by increasing patient and provider awareness of the management recommendations.

This case series study examines differences in surgical treatment among adult females with invasive breast cancer who have pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants in genes with high vs moderate breast cancer penetrance.

Background Despite lower cancer incidence rates, cancer mortality is higher among rural compared to urban dwellers. Patient, provider, and institutional level factors contribute to these disparities. The overarching objective of this study is to leverage the multidisciplinary, multispecialty oncology team from an academic cancer center in order to provide comprehensive cancer care at both the patient and provider levels in rural healthcare centers. Our specific aims are to: 1) evaluate the clinical effectiveness of a multi-level telehealth-based intervention consisting of provider access to molecular tumor board expertise along with patient access to a supportive care intervention to improve cancer care delivery; and 2) identify the facilitators and barriers to future larger scale dissemination and implementation of the multi-level intervention. Methods Coordinated by a National Cancer Institute-designated comprehensive cancer center, this study will include providers and patients across several clinics in two large healthcare systems serving rural communities. Using a telehealth-based molecular tumor board, sequencing results are reviewed, predictive and prognostic markers are discussed, and treatment plans are formulated between expert oncologists and rural providers. Simultaneously, the rural patients will be randomized to receive an evidence-based 6-week self-management supportive care program, Cancer Thriving and Surviving, versus an education attention control. Primary outcomes will be provider uptake of the molecular tumor board recommendation and patient treatment adherence. A mixed methods approach guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research that combines qualitative key informant interviews and quantitative surveys will be collected from both the patient and provider in order to identify facilitators and barriers to implementing the multi-level intervention. Discussion The proposed study will leverage information technology-enabled, team-based care delivery models in order to deliver comprehensive, coordinated, and high-quality cancer care to rural and/or underserved populations. Simultaneous attention to institutional, provider, and patient level barriers to quality care will afford the opportunity for us to broadly share oncology expertise and develop dissemination and implementation strategies that will enhance the cancer care delivered to patients residing within underserved rural communities. Trial registration Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT04758338. Registered 17 February 2021 – Retrospectively registered, http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/

Females with a BRCA1/2 (BRCA) pathogenic variant have high lifetime risks for cancer. Regularly updated guidelines are in place that recommend screening and/or surgery to monitor and/or significantly reduce breast or ovarian cancer risk. Follow-up care decision making among this population is important to explore to understand the multi-faceted influences guiding cancer screening behaviors and risk-reducing surgery decisions. Using lived-experience theory and cognitive anthropology, this study explored emotional and social influences on decision making and behavioral adherence to guideline recommendations among twenty-seven female BRCA carriers. Ethnographic data from in-depth interviews were analyzed in parallel with self-reported survey data on perceived threat, response efficacy, and self-efficacy constructs. Survey results demonstrated high rates of adherence to guideline recommendations and high levels of perceived threat and response efficacy with lower levels of self-efficacy, while interview data revealed multi-faceted motivators and challenges associated with behavioral adherence. These findings unearth complex lived-experiences within the context of perceived threat, response efficacy, and self-efficacy and explore the cognitive relationship between motivators and challenges to inherited cancer follow-up care decision making and behavioral adherence. This study demonstrates how anthropological practice can aid in inherited cancer research and be used to support the development of interventions that consider cognitive influences on behavior.

Purpose PALB2 germline pathogenic variants are associated with increased breast cancer risk and smaller increased risk of pancreatic and likely ovarian cancer. Resources for health-care professionals managing PALB2 heterozygotes are currently limited. Methods A workgroup of experts sought to outline management of PALB2 heterozygotes based on current evidence. Peer-reviewed publications from PubMed were identified to guide recommendations, which arose by consensus and the collective expertise of the authors. Results PALB2 heterozygotes should be offered BRCA1/2-equivalent breast surveillance. Risk-reducing mastectomy can be considered guided by personalized risk estimates. Pancreatic cancer surveillance should be considered, but ideally as part of a clinical trial. Typically, ovarian cancer surveillance is not recommended, and risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy should only rarely be considered before the age of 50. Given the mechanistic similarities, PALB2 heterozygotes should be considered for therapeutic regimens and trials as those for BRCA1/2. Conclusion This guidance is similar to those for BRCA1/2. While the range of the cancer risk estimates overlap with BRCA1/2, point estimates are lower in PALB2 so individualized estimates are important for management decisions. Systematic prospective data collection is needed to determine as yet unanswered questions such as the risk of contralateral breast cancer and survival after cancer diagnosis.

PURPOSE: There is an urgent need to understand the biological factors contributing to the racial survival disparity among women with hormone receptor-positive (HR+), HER2− breast cancer. In this study, we examined the impact of PAM50 subtype on 10-year mortality rate in women with HR+, HER2− breast cancer by race. METHODS: Women with localized, HR+, HER2− breast cancer diagnosed between 2002 to 2012 from two population-based cohorts were evaluated. Archival tumors were obtained and classified by PAM50 into four molecular subtypes (i.e., luminal A, luminal B, HER2-enriched, and basal-like). The molecular subtypes within HR+, HER2− breast cancers and corresponding 10-year mortality rate were compared between Black and Non-Hispanic White (NHW) women using Cox proportional hazard ratios and survival analysis, adjusting for covariates. RESULTS: In this study, 318 women with localized, HR+, HER2− breast cancer were included—227 Black (71%) and 91 NHW (29%). Young Black women (age≤50) had the highest proportion of HR+,non-luminal A tumors (47%), compared to young NHW (10%), older Black women (31%), and older NHW (30%). Overall, women with HR+,non-luminal A subtypes had a higher 10-year mortality rate compared to HR+, luminal A subtypes after adjustment for age, stage and income (HR 4.21 for Blacks, 95% CI=1.74–10.18 and HR 3.44 for NHW, 95% CI=1.31–9.03). Among HR+, non-luminal A subtypes there was however no significant racial difference in 10-yr mortality observed (Black vs. NHW: HR 1.23, 95% CI=0.58–2.58). CONCLUSION: Molecular subtype classification highlights racial disparities in PAM50 subtype distribution among women with HR+, HER2− breast cancer. Among women with HR+, HER2− breast cancer, racial survival disparities are ameliorated after adjusting for molecular subtype.

Importance: The reasons underlying racial/ethnic mortality disparities for cancer patients remain poorly understood, especially regarding the role of access to care. Participants: Over five million patients with a primary diagnosis of lung, breast, prostate, colon/rectum, pancreas, ovary, or liver cancer during 2004–2014, were identified from the National Cancer Database. Cox proportional hazards models were applied to estimate hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for total mortality associated with race/ethnicity, and access to care related factors (i.e., socioeconomic status [SES], insurance, treating facility, and residential type) for each cancer. Results: Racial/ethnic disparities in total mortality were observed across seven cancers. Compared with non-Hispanic (NH)-white patients, NH-black patients with breast (HR = 1.27, 95% CI: 1.26 to 1.29), ovarian (HR = 1.20, 95% CI: 1.17 to 1.23), prostate (HR = 1.31, 95% CI: 1.30 to 1.33), colorectal (HR = 1.11, 95% CI: 1.10 to 1.12) or pancreatic (HR = 1.03, 95% CI: 1.02 to 1.05) cancers had significantly elevated mortality, while Asians (13–31%) and Hispanics (13–19%) had lower mortality for all cancers. Racial/ethnic disparities were observed across all strata of access to care related factors and modified by those factors. NH-black and NH-white disparities were most evident among patients with high SES or those with private insurance, while Hispanic/Asian versus NH-white disparities were more evident among patients with low SES or those with no/poor insurance. Conclusions and Relevance: Racial/ethnic mortality disparities for major cancers exist across all patient groups with different access to care levels. The influence of SES or insurance on mortality disparity follows different patterns for racial/ethnic minorities versus NH-whites. Impact: Our study highlights the need for racial/ethnic-specific strategies to reduce the mortality disparities for major cancers.

Background:Factors contributing to breast cancer survival disparities in underrepresented racial and ethnic groups and low-income populations are poorly understood as few clinical trials and population based studies have included these underserved populations. The Southern Community Cohort Study (SCCS), a prospective cohort of underserved, low-income adults with high representation of Black participants, provides a unique opportunity to evaluate such disparities in cancer outcomes. A previous study utilizing SCCS data found no evidence of increased breast cancer risk among women with diabetes in this population. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the association of diabetes with overall survival in women with breast cancer in the SCCS. Methods:The SCCS enrolled approximately 86,000 participants aged 40-79 from 12 southeastern states between 2002-2009, 86% of whom were enrolled at Community Health Centers. This analysis includes women diagnosed with incident localized breast cancers identified through annual cohort linkage with 12 state cancer registries. Demographic data including participant age at breast cancer diagnosis, self-reported history of diabetes (patient answered yes to “has a doctor ever told you that you have diabetes”), body mass index (BMI), race, household income, and insurance coverage were obtained from baseline surveys, cancer type and stage data from state cancer registries, and survival data from death registries. Survival time was defined as the number of months between initial breast cancer diagnosis and death from any cause. Descriptive characteristics including mean (standard deviation) or number (%) were used to summarize demographics. We used Pearson Chi-squared analysis to examine the association between diabetes and overall survival. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression was used to evaluate overall survival and diabetes, adjusting for covariates including age (continuous), race, BMI (categorical by WHO classifications), household income (binary – annual income =$25,000), insurance coverage, cancer subtype, and cancer stage). Results:We identified a total of 1,347 women diagnosed with breast cancer. Of these, 1,016 were diagnosed with localized disease (stage 1-3) and comprised our analytic sample. Difference in denominators reflects missing data. The women were predominantly Black (667/1,016, 65.6%), low income (719/1,016 annual income less than $25,000, 70.8%), and insured (Private insurance 220/763, 28.8%; Medicare 331/763, 43.4%; Medicaid 178/763, 23.3%). Average age at diagnosis was 60.7 years (SD 9.1, IQR 41-88). Approximately one quarter of the patients (258/994, 26.0%) self-reported diabetes and 59.6% (605/1,016) were obese (BMI >=30). The breast cancer immunohistochemistry subtypes in this cohort of women included HR+HER2- (392/564, 69.5%), HR+,HER2+ (55/564, 9.8%), HR-,HER2+ (31/564, 5.5%), and HR-HER2- (86/564, 15.3%). Women with diabetes had lower overall survival (174/258, 67.4%) than women without diabetes (587/746, 79.8%) (p Conclusion: In a low-income, predominantly Black population with incident localized breast cancer, decreased overall survival was observed among women diabetes compared to those without diabetes. Future studies should explore additional biological, societal, and socio-economic factors affecting survival among women with breast cancer in medically underserved minority populations. Citation Format: Lucy B. Spalluto, Sonya Reid, Diane Haddad, Tuya Pal, Ingrid A. Mayer, Xiao-ou Shu, Maureen Sanderson, Wei Zheng, William J. Blot, Loren Lipworth. Diabetes decreases overall survival in women with breast cancer in the southern community cohort study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD11-05.

Background:Breast cancer outcomes in minority and low socioeconomic status populations are not clearly defined due to underrepresentation of these underserved populations in breast cancer clinical trials and population-based studies. The Southern Community Cohort Study (SCCS), a prospective cohort of underserved, predominantly Black participants, provides a unique opportunity to evaluate disparities in breast cancer outcomes. We sought to examine the association between race and socioeconomic status (SES) and overall survival (OS) in women with localized breast cancer in the SCCS. Methods:The SCCS enrolled approximately 86,000 participants aged 40-79 from 12 Southeastern states between 2002-2009, 86% of whom were enrolled at Community Health Centers. This analysis includes women diagnosed with incident localized breast cancer (stage I-III) identified through annual cohort linkage with 12 state cancer registries through December 20, 2017. Demographic data including participant age, self-reported history of diagnosed diabetes, body mass index (BMI), race, annual household income, and insurance coverage were obtained from baseline surveys. Tumor grade and stage were obtained from state cancer registries, and survival data were obtained from death registry records. Immunohistochemical (IHC) subtype was determined from tumor estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) status obtained from cancer registry records and pathology reports. Survival time was defined as the number of months between initial breast cancer diagnosis and death from any cause. Descriptive analyses including mean (standard deviation) and number (%) were used to summarize clinical and sociodemographic characteristics by race. Multivariable Cox survival analysis was used to evaluate OS by race and annual household income, adjusting for age, insurance, stage, IHC subtype, diabetes, and BMI. Results:Of the 1347 women diagnosed with incident breast cancer, 1016 had localized disease (stage I-III) and comprised our analytic sample. Compared to White women, Black women were more likely to have lower income, higher prevalence of triple negative breast cancer (TNBC), grade III tumors and stage III breast cancer (Table 1). After adjusting for clinical and sociodemographic factors, Black women had similar OS compared to White women (HR 0.67; 95% CI 0.42-1.07). However, after adjusting for race, women with a household income ≥ $25,000 had an improved OS compared to those with annual household income < $25,000 (HR 0.53; 95% CI 0.30-0.93). Conclusion: In a low-income, medically underserved population, Black women with localized breast cancer had similar OS compared to White women. However, socioeconomic disparities were observed, with worse OS for women with low annual household income. Future studies focused on minority, underserved groups are imperative to better understand the non-biological and biological factors contributing to disparities in survival among women with breast cancer. Table 1. Patient characteristics overall and by racePatient CharacteristicsTotal(N=1016)Black(N=667)White(N=349)P-value*Age at diagnosis, years (Mean, SD)61 (9)60 (9)63 (9)Income, annual household (N, %) < $25,000 ≥ $25,000719 (71)297 (29)503 (75)164 (25)216(62)133 (38) Citation Format: Sonya Reid, Lucy B Spalluto, Diane Haddad, Tuya Pal, Ingrid Mayer, Xiao-ou Shu, Wei Zheng, Maureen Sanderson, William Blot, Loren Lipworth. The association of race and socioeconomic status with overall survival in women with breast cancer in the southern community cohort study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS7-34.

BACKGROUND: Population-based estimates of the risk of breast cancer associated with germline pathogenic variants in cancer-predisposition genes are critically needed for risk assessment and management in women with inherited pathogenic variants. METHODS: In a population-based case–control study, we performed sequencing using a custom multigene amplicon-based panel to identify germline pathogenic variants in 28 cancer-predisposition genes among 32,247 women with breast cancer (case patients) and 32,544 unaffected women (controls) from population-based studies in the Cancer Risk Estimates Related to Susceptibility (CARRIERS) consortium. Associations between pathogenic variants in each gene and the risk of breast cancer were assessed. RESULTS: Pathogenic variants in 12 established breast cancer–predisposition genes were detected in 5.03% of case patients and in 1.63% of controls. Pathogenic variants in BRCA1 and BRCA2 were associated with a high risk of breast cancer, with odds ratios of 7.62 (95% confidence interval [CI], 5.33 to 11.27) and 5.23 (95% CI, 4.09 to 6.77), respectively. Pathogenic variants in PALB2 were associated with a moderate risk (odds ratio, 3.83; 95% CI, 2.68 to 5.63). Pathogenic variants in BARD1, RAD51C, and RAD51D were associated with increased risks of estrogen receptor–negative breast cancer and triple-negative breast cancer, whereas pathogenic variants in ATM, CDH1, and CHEK2 were associated with an increased risk of estrogen receptor–positive breast cancer. Pathogenic variants in 16 candidate breast cancer–predisposition genes, including the c.657_661del5 founder pathogenic variant in NBN, were not associated with an increased risk of breast cancer. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides estimates of the prevalence and risk of breast cancer associated with pathogenic variants in known breast cancer–predisposition genes in the U.S. population. These estimates can inform cancer testing and screening and improve clinical management strategies for women in the general population with inherited pathogenic variants in these genes. (Funded by the National Institutes of Health and the Breast Cancer Research Foundation.)

Background: There have been renewed calls for greater inclusivity of populations most prominently affected by cancer health inequities across the cancer research enterprise, particularly Black and African American populations. In cancer health services research there are myriad methodologies and data sources to study cancer treatment outcomes including medical records, cancer registries, and primary data collection. These different methodologies have varying levels of resource intensity that may affect the recruitment of marginalized populations. Little is known about how much concordance between data sources may exist among marginalized populations with cancer, which has substantial implications for cancer inequities research. Objective: To evaluate the data concordance between medical records, cancer registries, and self-reported survey data among an underrepresented population in cancer population sciences research. Methods: This investigation used a population-based sample of self-identified Black women recruited through the Tennessee and Florida Cancer registries who were diagnosed with invasive breast cancer at or below the age of 50. Participants completed medical records release forms and questionnaires about their cancer treatment trajectories. Comparing data contained in the cancer registries, medical records, and self-reported data, we quantitatively assessed the concordance between data sources for receipt of surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation, using medical records as the gold standard. Results: In total, 558 Black women at or below 50 with invasive breast cancer had available registry data and also completed a medical records release. In terms of missing data for receipt of surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation, self-report was the most complete, followed by the registry and then the medical records. Among those with complete data, comparing the medical records to the cancer registry, accuracy was high for surgery (94.6% ; 95% CI 92.2, 96.4) and chemotherapy (89.7%; 95% CI: 85.7, 92.8) , but low for radiation (55.4%, 95% CI: 48.5, 62.2) with the cancer registry missing the receipt of radiation that was noted in the medical records. Comparing medical records to self-report data, accuracy was >90% for surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation. Comparing the cancer registry to self-report, accuracy was high for surgery (94.5%; 95% CI: 92.0, 96.4), moderate for chemotherapy (88.2; 95% CI: 85.1,90.9), and low for radiation (67.2%; 95% CI 62.9, 71.3). Conclusion: For receipt of surgery and chemotherapy, there was high concordance between medical records, cancer registries, and self-reported data. The receipt of radiation was inconsistently reported in the cancer registry and medical records. When considering inclusivity in the study of cancer services delivery among marginalized populations, tradeoffs of data validity and resource intensity must be weighed. Citation Format: Mya L. Roberson, Lindsay Venton, Anne Weidner, Sonya Reid, Tuya Pal. Evaluating treatment data concordance among young Black women diagnosed with breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2023; Part 1 (Regular and Invited Abstracts); 2023 Apr 14-19; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(7_Suppl):Abstract nr 1939.

The NCCN Guidelines for Genetic/Familial High-Risk Assessment: Breast, Ovarian, and Pancreatic focus primarily on assessment of pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants associated with increased risk of breast, ovarian, and pancreatic cancer and recommended approaches to genetic testing/counseling and management strategies in individuals with these pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants. This manuscript focuses on cancer risk and risk management for BRCA-related breast/ovarian cancer syndrome and Li-Fraumeni syndrome. Carriers of a BRCA1/2 pathogenic or likely pathogenic variant have an excessive risk for both breast and ovarian cancer that warrants consideration of more intensive screening and preventive strategies. There is also evidence that risks of prostate cancer and pancreatic cancer are elevated in these carriers. Li-Fraumeni syndrome is a highly penetrant cancer syndrome associated with a high lifetime risk for cancer, including soft tissue sarcomas, osteosarcomas, premenopausal breast cancer, colon cancer, gastric cancer, adrenocortical carcinoma, and brain tumors.

To address the increasing demand for inherited cancer genetic testing, we developed and evaluated a web-based educational tool to streamline genetic counseling (GC). Consented patients viewed the initial prototype containing core content (Version 1-Core) and provided feedback through three open-ended survey questions. Additional data were collected through individual interviews from a subgroup who viewed an enhanced version (Version 1-Enhanced), consisting of the same core content and additional optional content. Data were coded to synthesize most commonly repeated themes and conceptualize action items to guide refinement strategies. Of 305 participants, 80 responded to open-ended survey questions to suggest refinement strategies, after viewing Version 1-Core. Interviews with a subgroup of seven participants, who viewed Version 1-Enhanced, provided additional feedback. Of 11 unique action items identified, five overlapped across datasets (provide instructions, simplify language, improve visuals, embed knowledge questions with explanations, include more insurance-related information), three were identified only through open-ended survey data (incorporate automatic progression, clarify test result information, increase interactive content), and three were identified only through interviews (ensure core content is viewed, incorporate progress bar, feature embedded optional content at the end of the tool). Ten action items aligned with underlying tool objectives to provide an interactive online pre-test GC solution and were used to guide refinement strategies. Our results demonstrate the value of rigorous qualitative data collection and analysis in health research and the use of the self-directed learning framework and eHealth strategies to leverage technology in scaling up and innovating the delivery of pre-test GC for inherited cancer.

Identification of inherited breast cancer may guide care. These benefits can be amplified through communication of genetic test results with at-risk family members and subsequent family testing (FT). Females with a pathogenic/likely pathogenic (P/LP) variant in BRCA1/2, PALB2, CHEK2, and/or ATM were surveyed about family communication (FC) of genetic test results and FT. Comparisons were made across genes. The 235 participants with P/LP variants (186 BRCA1/2, 28 PALB2, 15 CHEK2, and 6 ATM) had a median age of 54 and most were non-Hispanic whites (89%) with a prior breast cancer diagnosis (61%). When controlling for other variables, FC was higher among younger participants (p

Breast cancer is the most common cancer among women worldwide [1], with 268,600 new cases diagnosed in the United States in 2019 [2]. An estimated 5–10% of all breast cancer cases are due to heredi...

With technological advances, multi-gene panel testing has become increasingly used to identify patients at risk for hereditary breast cancer (HBC). There are currently evidence-based interventions and breast cancer screening strategies that exist for cancer prevention and early detection among patients with HBC. Moreover, in addition to the personal impact of identifying HBC, this information may be shared with at-risk family members to amplify the benefits of testing and subsequent care among those at high risk. Opportunities and challenges with the utilization of updated multi-gene panel testing for HBC, including: (a) tumor sequencing with germline consequences; (b) genetic counseling implications; and (c) strategies to improve the communication of genetic test results to family members will be reviewed. With the advances and expansion of genetic testing, all health care providers need to be updated on both the importance and complexities of HBC counseling and testing, in order to optimize patient care.

With the introduction of panel and direct-to-consumer testing, genetic testing has become commonplace in recent years, paving the way for both increased awareness around prevalent genetic cancer risks, and also an onslaught of misinformation. At the NCCN 2020 Virtual Annual Conference, Dr. Tuya Pal led a panel of experts in discussing the utility and difficulties associated with multigene testing, the emerging role of moderate-penetrance genes in defining risks for hereditary cancer, and the controversies associated with direct-to-consumer genetic testing services.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Despite a steady improvement in breast cancer survival rates over the past several decades, mortality disparities remain among Black women, who have a 42% higher death rate compared to non-Hispanic white (NHW) women. Hereditary breast cancer (HBC) accounts for 5–10% of all breast cancer cases, the majority of which are due to the BRCA1 and BRCA2 (BRCA) genes. Despite the availability of BRCA testing for over 25 years, there remain disproportionately lower rates of genetic testing among Blacks compared to NHW due to a multitude of factors. The intent of this review is to discuss racial disparities focused on HBC across diverse populations and review the existing gaps to be addressed when delivering gene-based care. RECENT FINDINGS: The factors contributing to the racial survival disparity are undoubtedly complex and likely an interplay between tumor biology, genomics, patterns of care and socioeconomic factors. Advances in genomic technologies that now allow for full characterization of germline DNA sequencing are integral in defining the complex and multifactorial cause of breast cancer and may help to explain the existing racial survival disparities. SUMMARY: Identification of inherited cancer risk may lead to cancer prevention, early cancer detection, treatment guidance, and ultimately has great potential to improve outcomes. Consequently, advances in HBC diagnosis and treatment without widespread implementation have the potential to further widen the existing breast cancer mortality gap between Black and NHW women.

Background The risks of breast cancer in African American (AA) women associated with inherited mutations in breast cancer predisposition genes are not well defined. Thus, whether multigene germline hereditary cancer testing panels are applicable to this population is unknown. We assessed associations between mutations in panel-based genes and breast cancer risk in 5054 AA women with breast cancer and 4993 unaffected AA women drawn from 10 epidemiologic studies. Methods Germline DNA samples were sequenced for mutations in 23 cancer predisposition genes using a QIAseq multiplex amplicon panel. Prevalence of mutations and odds ratios (ORs) for associations with breast cancer risk were estimated with adjustment for study design, age, and family history of breast cancer. Results Pathogenic mutations were identified in 10.3% of women with estrogen receptor (ER)-negative breast cancer, 5.2% of women with ER-positive breast cancer, and 2.3% of unaffected women. Mutations in BRCA1, BRCA2, and PALB2 were associated with high risks of breast cancer (OR = 47.55, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 10.43 to >100; OR = 7.25, 95% CI = 4.07 to 14.12; OR = 8.54, 95% CI = 3.67 to 24.95, respectively). RAD51D mutations were associated with high risk of ER-negative disease (OR = 7.82, 95% CI = 1.61 to 57.42). Moderate risks were observed for CHEK2, ATM, ERCC3, and FANCC mutations with ER-positive cancer, and RECQL mutations with all breast cancer. Conclusions The study identifies genes that predispose to breast cancer in the AA population, demonstrates the validity of current breast cancer testing panels for use in AA women, and provides a basis for increased referral of AA patients for cancer genetic testing.

BACKGROUND With the increasing use of multigene panel tests, pathogenic and likely pathogenic (P/LP) variants are identified more frequently in the moderate-penetrance breast cancer genes ATM and CHEK2. Lifetime breast cancer risk among women with P/LP variants in these genes generally exceeds 20%, meeting the threshold at which high-risk breast cancer screening through breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is recommended. METHODS Among a registry-based sample of 56 ATM and 69 CHEK2 carriers, the authors sought to determine the percentage of relatives in whom a P/LP variant would impact breast cancer surveillance. Lifetime breast cancer risks for unaffected, female first-degree and second-degree relatives were estimated using the Breast and Ovarian Analysis of Disease Incidence and Carrier Estimation Algorithm (BOADICEA). RESULTS Among first-degree relatives of ATM and CHEK2 carriers, only 22.6% and 14.9%, respectively, were found to have lifetime breast cancer risks of ≥20% based on family cancer history alone; however, when including the proband's P/LP variant in the model, these percentages increased significantly to 56.6% and 55.3%, respectively (P

The NCCN Guidelines for Genetic/Familial High-Risk Assessment: Breast, Ovarian, and Pancreatic provide recommendations for genetic testing and counseling for hereditary cancer syndromes, and risk management recommendations for patients who are diagnosed with syndromes associated with an increased risk of these cancers. The NCCN panel meets at least annually to review comments, examine relevant new data, and reevaluate and update recommendations. These NCCN Guidelines Insights summarize the panel’s discussion and most recent recommendations regarding criteria for high-penetrance genes associated with breast and ovarian cancer beyond BRCA1/2, pancreas screening and genes associated with pancreatic cancer, genetic testing for the purpose of systemic therapy decision-making, and testing for people with Ashkenazi Jewish ancestry.

PURPOSE To estimate age-specific relative and absolute cancer risks of breast cancer and to estimate risks of ovarian, pancreatic, male breast, prostate, and colorectal cancers associated with germline PALB2 pathogenic variants (PVs) because these risks have not been extensively characterized. METHODS We analyzed data from 524 families with PALB2 PVs from 21 countries. Complex segregation analysis was used to estimate relative risks (RRs; relative to country-specific population incidences) and absolute risks of cancers. The models allowed for residual familial aggregation of breast and ovarian cancer and were adjusted for the family-specific ascertainment schemes. RESULTS We found associations between PALB2 PVs and risk of female breast cancer (RR, 7.18; 95% CI, 5.82 to 8.85; P = 6.5 × 10−76), ovarian cancer (RR, 2.91; 95% CI, 1.40 to 6.04; P = 4.1 × 10−3), pancreatic cancer (RR, 2.37; 95% CI, 1.24 to 4.50; P = 8.7 × 10−3), and male breast cancer (RR, 7.34; 95% CI, 1.28 to 42.18; P = 2.6 × 10−2). There was no evidence for increased risks of prostate or colorectal cancer. The breast cancer RRs declined with age ( P for trend = 2.0 × 10−3). After adjusting for family ascertainment, breast cancer risk estimates on the basis of multiple case families were similar to the estimates from families ascertained through population-based studies ( P for difference = .41). On the basis of the combined data, the estimated risks to age 80 years were 53% (95% CI, 44% to 63%) for female breast cancer, 5% (95% CI, 2% to 10%) for ovarian cancer, 2%-3% (95% CI females, 1% to 4%; 95% CI males, 2% to 5%) for pancreatic cancer, and 1% (95% CI, 0.2% to 5%) for male breast cancer. CONCLUSION These results confirm PALB2 as a major breast cancer susceptibility gene and establish substantial associations between germline PALB2 PVs and ovarian, pancreatic, and male breast cancers. These findings will facilitate incorporation of PALB2 into risk prediction models and optimize the clinical cancer risk management of PALB2 PV carriers.

Purpose: All women diagnosed with breast cancer (BC) ≤ age 50 should be referred for genetic counseling (GC) and testing. We sought to compare differences in provider practices and access across a racially and ethnically diverse population of young BC survivors. Methods: A registry-based sample of women diagnosed with invasive BC ≤ age 50 from 2009 to 2012 was recruited through the Florida Cancer Registry, and completed a questionnaire and medical record release. Differences were compared across those tested with or without the involvement of a board-certified or credentialed genetics health professional (GHP) in 1) clinical and demographic variables; and 2) pre-test GC elements. Results: Of 1622 participants, there were 440 Blacks, 285 Hispanics, and 897 Non-Hispanic Whites. Of 831 participants with medical record verification of testing provider, 170 (20%) had documentation of GHP involvement. Among the 613 who recalled a pre-test discussion and had GC elements collected, those with GHP involvement were significantly more likely to recall the seven recognized GC elements. Conclusion: GHP involvement was associated with adherence to nationally recommended best practices. With the expanding importance of identifying inherited cancers, it is critical to ensure equitable access to best practices across all populations.

Despite higher incidence and mortality of breast cancer among younger Black women, genetic testing outcomes remain severely understudied among Blacks. Past research on disclosure of genetic testing results to family members has disproportionately focused on White, educated, high socioeconomic status women. This study addresses this gap in knowledge by assessing (1) to whom Black women disclose genetic test results and (2) if patterns of disclosure vary based on test result (e.g., BRCA1/2 positive, negative, variant of uncertain significance [VUS]). Black women (N=149) with invasive breast cancer diagnosed age ≤50 years from 2009–2012 received free genetic testing through a prospective, population-based study. At 12 months post-testing, women reported with whom they shared their genetic test results. The exact test by binomial distribution was used to examine whether disclosure to female relatives was significantly greater than disclosure to male relatives, and logistic regression analyses tested for differences in disclosure to any female relative, any male relative, parents, siblings, children, and spouses by genetic test result. Most (77%) women disclosed their results to at least one family member. Disclosure to female relatives was significantly greater than disclosure to males (p0.12). Results suggest that in Black families, one benefit of genetic testing – to inform patients and their family with cancer risk information – is not being realized. To increase breast cancer preventive care among high-risk Black women, the oncology care team should prepare Black BRCA1/2 positive women to share genetic test results with family members and, in particular, their daughters.

Purpose: Prognostic value of Oncotype DX Breast Recurrence Score (RS) in male patients with breast cancer is understudied. We evaluated associations of RS with overall mortality in male patients with breast cancer and compared it with female counterparts. Experimental Design: With a cohort of 848 male and 110,898 female patients with breast cancer identified from the National Cancer Database (2010–2014), we estimated HRs and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for overall mortality associated with RS using Cox regression models. RS was evaluated continuously, as well as by categorization following respective traditional (≤17, 18–30, and ≥31) and TAILORx (≤10, 11–25, and ≥26) cutoffs. Results: RS was positively associated with mortality in male patients (HR = 1.13; 95% CI, 1.02–1.26 per unit RS increment) up to RS > 21, after which the risk plateaued. Among female patients, mortality began to increase with RS only when RS > 23 (HR = 1.02; 95% CI, 1.01–1.02 per unit of RS increment). The intermediate- (HR = 5.37; 95% CI, 1.79–16.11) and high-risk diseases (HR = 4.28; 95% CI, 1.22–14.97) defined by TAILORx, but not traditional cutoffs established for female patients, were associated with elevated mortality risk in men even after adjustment for demographic, clinical characteristics, and treatments, except chemotherapy. Conclusions: RS is associated with mortality in male patients with breast cancer at a much lower threshold than that for female patients. Studies are needed to establish specific guidelines for RS thresholds for male patients with breast cancer.

Background: The lack of consensus on whether bilateral oophorectomy impacts risk of developing breast cancer among BRCA1 mutation carriers might be attributed to various biases, specifically, cancer-induced testing bias due to inclusion of prevalent cases. We conducted two complementary matched case–control analyses to evaluate the association of oophorectomy and BRCA1 breast cancer. Methods: A research questionnaire was administered every two years to collect information on exposures and disease. In the first analysis, we limited the study to prevalent breast cancer cases (diagnosed prior to study entry; n = 2,962) who were matched to controls on year of birth and country of residence (n = 4,358). In the second approach, we limited to 330 incident cases (diagnosed in the follow-up period) and 1,548 matched controls. Conditional logistic regression was used to estimate the adjusted odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) of invasive breast cancer. Results: In the first approach, there was a significant inverse association between oophorectomy and the risk of developing breast cancer [OR = 0.43; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.34–0.55; P < 00001]. In the second approach, there was no association between oophorectomy and risk (OR = 1.21; 95% CI, 0.87–1.70; P = 0.26). Conclusions: The inclusion of women with a personal history of breast cancer prior to ascertainment likely impacts upon the association of oophorectomy and BRCA1 breast cancer risk. Impact: Oophorectomy is unlikely a determinant of breast cancer risk in BRCA1 mutation carriers but should be offered at age 35 to reduce the risk of ovarian and fallopian tube cancer.

Background: The purpose of this study was to estimate the cumulative risks of all cancers in women from 50 to 75years of age with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 pathogenic variant. Methods: Participants were women with BRCA1 or BRCA2 pathogenic variants from 85 centers in 16 countries. Women were eligible if they had no cancer before the age of 50years. Participants completed a baseline questionnaire and follow-up questionnaires every 2 years. Women were followed from age 50 until a diagnosis of cancer, death, age 75, or last follow-up. The risk of all cancers combined from age 50 to 75 was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: There were 2211 women included (1470 BRCA1 and 742 BRCA2). There were 379 cancers diagnosed in the cohort between 50 and 75years. The actuarial risk of any cancer from age 50 to 75 was 49% for BRCA1 and 43% for BRCA2. Breast (n=186) and ovarian (n=45) were the most frequent cancers observed. For women who had both risk-reducing mastectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy before age 50, the risk of developing any cancer between age 50 and 75 was 9%. Conclusion: Women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 pathogenic variant have a high risk of cancer between the ages of 50 and 75years and should be counselled appropriately.

Background: Young-onset breast cancer is associated with higher mortality due to multiple factors including tumor biology and delayed presentation. Young women with breast cancer with longer treatment delays have decreased survival time, with the impact on survival being more prominent in Black women. The factors contributing to the racial survival disparity are complex and are likely an interplay between tumor biology, genomics, patterns of care and socioeconomic factors. This study looked at socioeconomic and clinical factors that may affect timely access to care for breast cancer in young Black women, and thus impact survival. Methods: Data from the Black Women Etiology and Survival of Triple-negative Breast Cancers (BEST) Study, a population-based cohort of Black women diagnosed with breast cancer ≤ 50 years old between 2009 and 2015 from the Florida and Tennessee State Cancer Registries was used. The time to treatment (in days) was used as the exposure variable and defined as the time from breast cancer diagnosis to the date of first treatment. The primary outcome was determined by distant or local recurrence or death. Pearson chi-square test was conducted to assess the association between clinical and socioeconomic factors with time to treatment. The socioeconomic variables studied were insurance, income and education. Clinical factors evaluated were the stage of breast cancer at diagnosis, hormone subtype, neoadjuvant chemotherapy and type of surgery. Survival analysis and Cox proportional hazard model were performed to analyze the 10-year overall survival and recurrence rate while adjusting for income, breast cancer stage and hormone subtype. Results: There was a statistically significant association between time to treatment and hormone receptor subtype (p=0.04). More than 60% of women with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), and 57% of women with HER2+ breast cancer received treatment within a month of their breast cancer diagnosis. There was also a significant association between the time to treatment and type of surgery received (p=0.03). 64% of patients who had lumpectomies received treatment in ≤30 days, compared to 54% of patients who had a mastectomy. Survival analysis showed the highest mortality in patients with time to treatment >90 days, followed by patients who received treatment in ≤30 days. The study did not find a statistically significant association between insurance, income, or education on the timeliness of treatment for breast cancer. Conclusion: In our study of young Black women, delayed breast cancer treatment resulted in lower survival. While those with TNBC and HER2+ disease were more likely to receive treatment ≤30 days, i.e. neoadjuvant chemotherapy to assess response to chemotherapy and the amount of residual disease at the time of the surgery, the enrichment for aggressive disease is likely the reason for the low survival observed in this group. Timely access to treatment for breast cancer impacts survival and strategies to decrease treatment delays are crucial to reducing breast cancer mortality. Citation Format: Kikelola Oyeleye, Rebecca Lee, Sonya Reid, Tuya Pal, Anne Weidner, Lindsay Venton. Association between socioeconomic and clinical factors on timely access to care among young Black women with breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 15th AACR Conference on the Science of Cancer Health Disparities in Racial/Ethnic Minorities and the Medically Underserved; 2022 Sep 16-19; Philadelphia, PA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2022;31(1 Suppl):Abstract nr A070.

Introduction Genetic testing is an increasingly important part of cancer treatment for women with breast cancer diagnosed under age 45. There has been evidence about low testing uptake and barriers to genetic testing for eligible Black women but less is known about motivations for testing. The objective of this study was to assess reasons for pursuing genetic testing among young Black women with breast cancer. Methods Study participants were a population-based sample of self-identified Black women diagnosed with invasive breast cancer at or below age 50, recruited through the Florida and Tennessee state cancer registries. Participants were categorized into tested and not tested groups. Among the tested, participants were asked why they pursued testing and response options included to guide surgical decisions, chemotherapeutic decisions, radiation decisions, or to benefit family. Respondents were categorized into 4 groups: no motivation specified; treatment motivation only; family benefit motivation only; both treatment and family motivation. Logistic regression was used to estimate factors associated with type of motivation. Results In total, 175 women were eligible for inclusion, 135 women had received genetic testing, and 40 had not. Median age of breast cancer diagnosis was 43. Among tested women, 30 (22%) endorsed treatment motivation only, 69 (51%) endorsed family motivation only, and 31 (23%) endorsed both treatment and family motivation. Women who had daughters had higher odds of endorsing being motivated by family benefit (OR 3.87, 95% CI 1.98, 7.57). This relationship was not seen for having sons (OR 0.84, 0.49, 1.83), sisters (OR 0.78, 95% CI 0.34, 1.77) or brothers (0.87, 0.43, 1.73). Among the 40 women who did not receive genetic testing, 24 (60%) indicated a lack of testing recommendation. Conclusions In our investigation, we found that a greater number of Black women were motivated to pursue genetic testing because of the potential benefit to family members rather than to guide treatment decisions. This finding was especially pronounced among women who had daughters. The null relationship between having sons or either gender sibling and motivation driven by family benefit may reflect greater awareness of BRCA associations with female breast cancer and low awareness of male breast and other BRCA associated cancers. Our findings suggest that conversations around the importance of genetic testing may need to go beyond the importance of guiding treatment decisions and include discussions around the potential benefit for family members. Citation Format: Mya L. Roberson, Sonya Reid, Tuya Pal. Reasons for pursuing genetic testing among young Black women with breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 15th AACR Conference on the Science of Cancer Health Disparities in Racial/Ethnic Minorities and the Medically Underserved; 2022 Sep 16-19; Philadelphia, PA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2022;31(1 Suppl):Abstract nr C007.

Black women are overrepresented among premenopausal breast cancer (BC) survivors. These patients warrant genetic testing (GT) followed by risk-reducing behaviors. This study documented patterns and predictors of cancer risk-management behaviors among young black BC survivors after GT. Black women (n = 143) with a diagnosis of BC at the age of 50 years or younger received GT. At 1 year after GT, participants reported receipt of risk-reducing mastectomy, risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy, mammogram, breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), CA125 test, and transvaginal/pelvic ultrasound. Logistic regression was used to examine predictors of BC risk management (risk-reducing mastectomy or breast MRI) and ovarian cancer risk management (risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy, CA125 test, or transvaginal/pelvic ultrasound). Of the study participants, 16 (11%) were BRCA1/2-positive, 43 (30%) had a variant of uncertain significance, and 84 (59%) were negative. During the 12 months after GT, no women received risk-reducing mastectomy. The majority (93%) received a mammogram, and a smaller proportion received breast MRI (33%), risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (10%), CA125 test (11%), or transvaginal/pelvic ultrasound (34%). Longer time since the BC diagnosis predicted lower likelihood of BC risk management (odds ratio [OR] 0.54). BRCA1/2 carrier status (OR 4.57), greater perceived risk of recurrence (OR 8.03), and more hereditary breast and ovarian cancer knowledge (OR 1.37) predicted greater likelihood of ovarian cancer risk management. Young black BC survivors appropriately received mammograms and ovarian cancer risk management based on their BRCA1/2 test result. However, the low usage of MRI among BRCA1/2 carriers contrasts with national guidelines. Future research should examine barriers to MRI among black BC survivors. Finally, modifiable variables predicting risk management after GT were identified, providing implications for future interventions.