Search

Background A common 30 kb deletion affecting the APOBEC3A and APOBEC3B genes has been linked to increased APOBEC activity and APOBEC-related mutational signatures in human cancers. The role of this deletion as a cancer risk factor remains controversial. Materials and Methods We genotyped the APOBEC3A/B deletion in a sample of 1,470 Norwegian endometrial cancer cases and compared to 1,918 healthy controls. For assessment across Caucasian populations, we mined genotypes of the SNP rs12628403, which is in strong linkage disequilibrium with the deletion, in a GWAS dataset of 4,274 cases and 18,125 healthy controls, through the ECAC consortium. Results We found the APOBEC3A/B deletion variant to be significantly associated with reduced risk of endometrial cancer among Norwegian women (OR = 0.75; 95% CI = 0.62–0.91; p = 0.003; dominant model). Similar results were found in the subgroup of endometrioid endometrial cancer (OR = 0.64; 95% CI = 0.51–0.79; p = 3.6 × 10−5; dominant model). The observed risk reduction was particularly strong among individuals in the range of 50–60 years of age (OR = 0.51; 95% CI = 0.33–0.78; p = 0.002; dominant model). In the different populations included in the ECAC dataset, the ORs varied from 0.85 to 1.05. Although five out of six populations revealed ORs

Single-nucleotide variations (SNVs) (formerly single-nucleotide polymorphism [SNV]) influence genetic predisposition to endometrial cancer. We hypothesized that a polygenic risk score (PRS) comprising multiple SNVs may improve endometrial cancer risk prediction for targeted screening and prevention.We developed PRSs from SNVs identified from a systematic review of published studies and suggestive SNVs from the Endometrial Cancer Association Consortium. These were tested in an independent study of 555 surgically-confirmed endometrial cancer cases and 1202 geographically-matched controls from Manchester, United Kingdom and validated in 1676 cases and 116,960 controls from the UK Biobank (UKBB).Age and body mass index predicted endometrial cancer in both data sets (Manchester: area under the receiver operator curve [AUC] = 0.77, 95% CI = 0.74-0.80; UKBB: AUC = 0.74, 95% CI = 0.73-0.75). The AUC for PRS19, PRS24, and PRS72 were 0.58, 0.55, and 0.57 in the Manchester study and 0.56, 0.54, and 0.54 in UKBB, respectively. For PRS19, women in the third tertile had a 2.1-fold increased risk of endometrial cancer compared with those in the first tertile of the Manchester study (odds ratio = 2.08, 95% CI = 1.61-2.68, PAn endometrial cancer risk prediction model incorporating a PRS derived from multiple SNVs may help stratify women for screening and prevention strategies.

Supplementary Table 2. Indolent versus aggressive disease analysis. Supplementary Table 3. Geometric mean PSA levels by genotype in cases and controls. Supplementary Table 4. Association of miRSNPs with prostate cancer risk in different age categories. Supplementary Table 5. Association of miRSNPs with expression of genes located in cis using TCGA SNP array and RNASeq data. Supplementary Figure 2. miRNA target reporter vector assays. Supplementary Figure 3. miR-3162-5p is expressed in prostate and prostate cancer-derived cell lines as well as in prostate cancer patient tissue samples.

Supplementary Table 1. Prostate cancer risk estimates for 2169 putative miRSNPs.

Supplementary Figure 1. Forest Plot (Fixed effects model) of the 22 prostate cancer risk associated miRSNPs.

Background: The strongest known risk factor for endometrial cancer is obesity. To determine whether SNPs associated with increased body mass index (BMI) or waist–hip ratio (WHR) are associated with endometrial cancer risk, independent of measured BMI, we investigated relationships between 77 BMI and 47 WHR SNPs and endometrial cancer in 6,609 cases and 37,926 country-matched controls.Methods: Logistic regression analysis and fixed effects meta-analysis were used to test for associations between endometrial cancer risk and (i) individual BMI or WHR SNPs, (ii) a combined weighted genetic risk score (wGRS) for BMI or WHR. Causality of BMI for endometrial cancer was assessed using Mendelian randomization, with BMIwGRS as instrumental variable.Results: The BMIwGRS was significantly associated with endometrial cancer risk (P = 3.4 × 10−17). Scaling the effect of the BMIwGRS on endometrial cancer risk by its effect on BMI, the endometrial cancer OR per 5 kg/m2 of genetically predicted BMI was 2.06 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.89–2.21], larger than the observed effect of BMI on endometrial cancer risk (OR = 1.55; 95% CI, 1.44–1.68, per 5 kg/m2). The association attenuated but remained significant after adjusting for BMI (OR = 1.22; 95% CI, 1.10–1.39; P = 5.3 × 10−4). There was evidence of directional pleiotropy (P = 1.5 × 10−4). BMI SNP rs2075650 was associated with endometrial cancer at study-wide significance (P < 4.0 × 10−4), independent of BMI. Endometrial cancer was not significantly associated with individual WHR SNPs or the WHRwGRS.Conclusions: BMI, but not WHR, is causally associated with endometrial cancer risk, with evidence that some BMI-associated SNPs alter endometrial cancer risk via mechanisms other than measurable BMI.Impact: The causal association between BMI SNPs and endometrial cancer has possible implications for endometrial cancer risk modeling. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 25(11); 1503–10. ©2016 AACR.

Excel file detailing case-control populations

Excel file detailing average BMI per study population

Excel file detailing single BMI SNP associations with EC risk and BMI

Excel file detailing single WHR SNP associations with EC risk

Supplementary Methods and Tables

Supplementary Text for manuscript.

Background: Common cancers develop through a multistep process often including inherited susceptibility. Collaboration among multiple institutions, and funding from multiple sources, has allowed the development of an inexpensive genotyping microarray, the OncoArray. The array includes a genome-wide backbone, comprising 230,000 SNPs tagging most common genetic variants, together with dense mapping of known susceptibility regions, rare variants from sequencing experiments, pharmacogenetic markers, and cancer-related traits.Methods: The OncoArray can be genotyped using a novel technology developed by Illumina to facilitate efficient genotyping. The consortium developed standard approaches for selecting SNPs for study, for quality control of markers, and for ancestry analysis. The array was genotyped at selected sites and with prespecified replicate samples to permit evaluation of genotyping accuracy among centers and by ethnic background.Results: The OncoArray consortium genotyped 447,705 samples. A total of 494,763 SNPs passed quality control steps with a sample success rate of 97% of the samples. Participating sites performed ancestry analysis using a common set of markers and a scoring algorithm based on principal components analysis.Conclusions: Results from these analyses will enable researchers to identify new susceptibility loci, perform fine-mapping of new or known loci associated with either single or multiple cancers, assess the degree of overlap in cancer causation and pleiotropic effects of loci that have been identified for disease-specific risk, and jointly model genetic, environmental, and lifestyle-related exposures.Impact: Ongoing analyses will shed light on etiology and risk assessment for many types of cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 26(1); 126–35. ©2016 AACR.

Branchpoint elements are required for intron removal, and variants at these elements can result in aberrant splicing. We aimed to assess the value of branchpoint annotations generated from recent large-scale studies to select branchpoint-abrogating variants, using hereditary cancer genes as model.We identified branchpoint elements in 119 genes associated with hereditary cancer from 3 genome-wide experimentally-inferred and 2 predicted branchpoint data sets. We then identified variants that occur within branchpoint elements from public databases. We compared conservation, unique variant observations, and population frequencies at different nucleotides within branchpoint motifs. Finally, selected minigene assays were performed to assess the splicing effect of variants at branchpoint elements within mismatch repair genes.There was poor overlap between predicted and experimentally-inferred branchpoints. Our analysis of cancer genes suggested that variants at -2 nucleotide, -1 nucleotide, and branchpoint positions in experimentally-inferred canonical motifs are more likely to be clinically relevant. Minigene assay data showed the -2 nucleotide to be more important to branchpoint motif integrity but also showed fluidity in branchpoint usage.Data from cancer gene analysis suggest that there are few high-risk alleles that severely impact function via branchpoint abrogation. Results of this study inform a general scheme to prioritize branchpoint motif variants for further study.

BACKGROUND: Limited data from prospective studies suggest that higher dietary intake of long-chain omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (LCn3PUFA), which hold anti-inflammatory properties, may reduce endometrial cancer risk; particularly among certain subgroups characterized by body mass and tumor pathology.MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data from 12 prospective cohort studies participating in the Epidemiology of Endometrial Cancer Consortium were harmonized as nested case-control studies, including 7268 endometrial cancer cases and 26,133 controls. Habitual diet was assessed by food frequency questionnaire, from which fatty acid intakes were estimated. Two-stage individual-participant data mixed effects meta-analysis estimated adjusted odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) through logistic regression for associations between study-specific energy-adjusted quartiles of LCn3PUFA and endometrial cancer risk.RESULTS: Women with the highest versus lowest estimated dietary intakes of docosahexaenoic acid, the most abundant LCn3PUFA in diet, had a 9% increased endometrial cancer risk (Quartile 4 vs. Quartile 1: OR 1.09, 95% CI: 1.01-1.19; P trend = 0.04). Similar elevated risks were observed for the summary measure of total LCn3PUFA (OR 1.07, 95% CI: 0.99-1.16; P trend = 0.06). Stratified by body mass index, higher intakes of LCn3PUFA were associated with 12-19% increased endometrial cancer risk among overweight/obese women and no increased risk among normal-weight women. Higher associations appeared restricted to White women. The results did not differ by cancer grade.CONCLUSION: Higher dietary intakes of LCn3PUFA are unlikely to reduce endometrial cancer incidence; rather, they may be associated with small to moderate increases in risk in some subgroups of women, particularly overweight/obese women.

Alternative splicing contributes to cancer development. Indeed, splicing analysis of cancer genome-wide association study (GWAS) risk variants has revealed likely causal variants. To systematically assess GWAS variants for splicing effects, we developed a prioritization workflow using a combination of splicing prediction tools, alternative transcript isoform and splicing quantitative trait locus (sQTL) annotations. Application of this workflow to candidate causal variants from 16 endometrial cancer GWAS risk loci highlighted single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) that were predicted to upregulate alternative transcripts. For two variants, sQTL data supported the predicted impact on splicing. At the 17q11.2 locus, the protective allele for rs7502834 was associated with increased splicing of an exon inNF1alternative transcript encoding a truncated protein in adipose tissue and is consistent with an endometrial cancer transcriptome-wide association study (TWAS) finding in adipose tissue. Notably,NF1haploinsufficiency is protective for obesity, a well-established risk factor for endometrial cancer. At the 17q21.32 locus, the rs2278868 risk allele was predicted to upregulate aSKAP1transcript that is subject to nonsense mediated decay, concordant with a corresponding sQTL in lymphocytes. This is consistent with a TWAS finding that indicates decreasedSKAP1expression in blood increases endometrial cancer risk. As SKAP1 is involved in T-cell immune responses, decreasedSKAP1expression may impact endometrial tumor immunosurveillance. In summary, our analysis has identified potentially causal endometrial cancer GWAS risk variants with plausible biological mechanisms and provides a splicing annotation workflow to aid interpretation of other GWAS datasets.

Increased adiposity is a known risk factor for endometrial cancer (EC). This study aimed to disentangle the separate causal roles of child and adult adiposity on EC risk in adults, including endometrioid and non-endometrioid histological subtypes using multivariable Mendelian randomisation. These analyses employed genetic associations derived from UK Biobank as proxies for child and adult body size in 12,906 cases and 108,979 controls that participated in the Endometrial Cancer Association Consortium. In multivariable analyses, adult body size increased overall EC (OR 2.30, 95% CI 1.73–3.06) and endometrioid EC risk (OR 2.28, 95% CI 1.65–3.16), while child body size had minimal effect. In contrast, child body size (OR 2.26, 95% CI 1.03–4.99) but not adult body size increased non-endometrioid EC risk. As such, child adiposity has an indirect effect on endometrioid EC risk that is mediated by adult adiposity but has a direct effect on non-endometrioid EC risk that is independent of adult adiposity. These novel findings indicate that interventions targeting adiposity during distinct periods in life have a critical role in preventing subtype-specific EC.

BACKGROUND: Dysregulation of endocrine pathways related to steroid and growth hormones may modify endometrial cancer risk; however, prospective data on testosterone, sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG) and insulin-like growth factor (IGF)−1 are limited. To elucidate the role of these hormones in endometrial cancer risk we conducted complementary observational and Mendelian randomization (MR) analyses. METHODS: The observational analyses included 159,702 women (80% postmenopausal) enrolled in the UK Biobank. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using Cox proportional hazards models. For MR analyses, genetic variants associated with hormone levels were identified and their association with endometrial cancer (12,906 cases/108,979 controls) was examined using two-sample MR. RESULTS: In the observational analysis, higher circulating concentrations of total (HR per unit inverse normal scale = 1.38, 95% CI = 1.22–1.57) and free testosterone (HR per unit log scale = 2.07, 95% CI = 1.66–2.58) were associated with higher endometrial cancer risk. An inverse association was found for SHBG (HR per unit inverse normal scale = 0.76, 95% CI = 0.67–0.86). Results for testosterone and SHBG were supported by the MR analyses. No association was found between genetically predicted IGF-1 concentration and endometrial cancer risk. CONCLUSIONS: Our results support probable causal associations between circulating concentrations of testosterone and SHBG with endometrial cancer risk.

Hereditary endometrial cancer (EC) is most commonly attributed to pathogenic variants in mismatch repair (MMR) genes. Evidence supports existence of additional genetic risk factors in the context of multiple cancer diagnoses and/or family history of EC. EC patients (n=5292) referred for diagnostic multi-gene cancer panel testing were annotated for: presence of a pathogenic gene variant; personal history of prior, concurrent or subsequent cancer of another type; reported family history of Lynch syndrome or endometrial cancer. The Pearson χ2 test was used to assess differences in gene variant prevalence between case sub-groups defined by personal and/or family history of cancer/s, using cases with no family history of Lynch/EC as reference. Another cancer diagnosis was reported for 55% of EC cases. EC cases with prior and reported family history of Lynch cancer were enriched for variants in MLH1 (p=3.5x10-7 ), MSH2 (p=3.1x10-7 ), and PMS2 (p=0.02). Consistent with expectations for a breast cancer (BC) gene also predisposing to EC, variant frequency was increased in EC patients with prior BC and family history of EC for BRCA1 (p=1.7x10-5 ) and PALB2 (p=0.0002). Strategic case-case analyses to address cohort ascertainment bias has provided rationale to direct future studies of candidate hereditary EC genes. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Background: Many loci have been found to be associated with risk of epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). However, although there is considerable variation in progression-free survival (PFS), no loci have been found to be associated with outcome at genome-wide levels of significance. Methods: We carried out a genome-wide association study (GWAS) of PFS in 2,352 women with EOC who had undergone cytoreductive surgery and standard carboplatin/paclitaxel chemotherapy. Results: We found seven SNPs at 12q24.33 associated with PFS (P < 5 × 10–8), the top SNP being rs10794418 (HR = 1.24; 95% CI, 1.15–1.34; P = 1.47 × 10–8). High expression of a nearby gene, ULK1, is associated with shorter PFS in EOC, and with poor prognosis in other cancers. SNP rs10794418 is also associated with expression of ULK1 in ovarian tumors, with the allele associated with shorter PFS being associated with higher expression, and chromatin interactions were detected between the ULK1 promoter and associated SNPs in serous and endometrioid EOC cell lines. ULK1 knockout ovarian cancer cell lines showed significantly increased sensitivity to carboplatin in vitro. Conclusions: The locus at 12q24.33 represents one of the first genome-wide significant loci for survival for any cancer. ULK1 is a plausible candidate for the target of this association. Impact: This finding provides insight into genetic markers associated with EOC outcome and potential treatment options. See related commentary by Peres and Monteiro, p. 1604

Increased adiposity is a known risk factor for endometrial cancer (EC). This study aimed to disentangle the separate causal roles of child and adult adiposity on EC risk in adults, including endometrioid and non-endometrioid histological subtypes using multivariable Mendelian randomisation. These analyses employed genetic associations derived from UK Biobank as proxies for child and adult body size in 12,906 cases and 108,979 controls that participated in the Endometrial Cancer Association Consortium. In multivariable analyses, adult body size increased overall EC (OR 2.30, 95% CI 1.73-3.06) and endometrioid EC risk (OR 2.28, 95% CI 1.65-3.16), while child body size had minimal effect. In contrast, child body size (OR 2.26, 95% CI 1.03-4.99) but not adult body size increased non-endometrioid EC risk. As such, child adiposity has an indirect effect on endometrioid EC risk that is mediated by adult adiposity but has a direct effect on non-endometrioid EC risk that is independent of adult adiposity. These novel findings indicate that interventions targeting adiposity during distinct periods in life have a critical role in preventing subtype-specific EC.

It is unclear if body weight in early life affects cancer risk independently of adult body weight. To investigate this question for 6 obesity-related cancers, we performed univariable and multivariable analyses using 1) Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis and 2) longitudinal analyses in prospective cohorts. Both the MR and longitudinal analyses indicated that larger early life body size was associated with higher risk of endometrial (odds ratioMR = 1.61, 95% confidence interval = 1.23 to 2.11) and kidney (odds ratioMR = 1.40, 95% confidence interval = 1.09 to 1.80) cancer. These associations were attenuated after accounting for adult body size in both the MR and cohort analyses. Early life body mass index (BMI) was not consistently associated with the other investigated cancers. The lack of clear independent risk associations suggests that early life BMI influences endometrial and kidney cancer risk mainly through pathways that are common with adult BMI.

Genome-wide analysis identifies 32 loci associated with breast cancer susceptibility, accounting for estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 status and tumor grade. Breast cancer susceptibility variants frequently show heterogeneity in associations by tumor subtype(1-3). To identify novel loci, we performed a genome-wide association study including 133,384 breast cancer cases and 113,789 controls, plus 18,908 BRCA1 mutation carriers (9,414 with breast cancer) of European ancestry, using both standard and novel methodologies that account for underlying tumor heterogeneity by estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 status and tumor grade. We identified 32 novel susceptibility loci (P < 5.0 x 10(-8)), 15 of which showed evidence for associations with at least one tumor feature (false discovery rate < 0.05). Five loci showed associations (P < 0.05) in opposite directions between luminal and non-luminal subtypes. In silico analyses showed that these five loci contained cell-specific enhancers that differed between normal luminal and basal mammary cells. The genetic correlations between five intrinsic-like subtypes ranged from 0.35 to 0.80. The proportion of genome-wide chip heritability explained by all known susceptibility loci was 54.2% for luminal A-like disease and 37.6% for triple-negative disease. The odds ratios of polygenic risk scores, which included 330 variants, for the highest 1% of quantiles compared with middle quantiles were 5.63 and 3.02 for luminal A-like and triple-negative disease, respectively. These findings provide an improved understanding of genetic predisposition to breast cancer subtypes and will inform the development of subtype-specific polygenic risk scores.

Background Endometrial cancer is the most common gynaecological cancer in high-income countries. Elevated body mass index (BMI) is an established modifiable risk factor for this condition and is estimated to confer a larger effect on endometrial cancer risk than any other cancer site. However, the molecular mechanisms underpinning this association remain unclear. We used Mendelian randomization (MR) to evaluate the causal role of 14 molecular risk factors (hormonal, metabolic and inflammatory markers) in endometrial cancer risk. We then evaluated and quantified the potential mediating role of these molecular traits in the relationship between BMI and endometrial cancer using multivariable MR. Methods Genetic instruments to proxy 14 molecular risk factors and BMI were constructed by identifying single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) reliably associated (P < 5.0 × 10−8) with each respective risk factor in previous genome-wide association studies (GWAS). Summary statistics for the association of these SNPs with overall and subtype-specific endometrial cancer risk (12,906 cases and 108,979 controls) were obtained from a GWAS meta-analysis of the Endometrial Cancer Association Consortium (ECAC), Epidemiology of Endometrial Cancer Consortium (E2C2) and UK Biobank. SNPs were combined into multi-allelic models and odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were generated using inverse-variance weighted random-effects models. The mediating roles of the molecular risk factors in the relationship between BMI and endometrial cancer were then estimated using multivariable MR. Results In MR analyses, there was strong evidence that BMI (OR per standard deviation (SD) increase 1.88, 95% CI 1.69 to 2.09, P = 3.87 × 10−31), total testosterone (OR per inverse-normal transformed nmol/L increase 1.64, 95% CI 1.43 to 1.88, P = 1.71 × 10−12), bioavailable testosterone (OR per natural log transformed nmol/L increase: 1.46, 95% CI 1.29 to 1.65, P = 3.48 × 10−9), fasting insulin (OR per natural log transformed pmol/L increase: 3.93, 95% CI 2.29 to 6.74, P = 7.18 × 10−7) and sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG, OR per inverse-normal transformed nmol/L increase 0.71, 95% CI 0.59 to 0.85, P = 2.07 × 10−4) had a causal effect on endometrial cancer risk. Additionally, there was suggestive evidence that total serum cholesterol (OR per mg/dL increase 0.90, 95% CI 0.81 to 1.00, P = 4.01 × 10−2) had an effect on endometrial cancer risk. In mediation analysis, we found evidence for a mediating role of fasting insulin (19% total effect mediated, 95% CI 5 to 34%, P = 9.17 × 10−3), bioavailable testosterone (15% mediated, 95% CI 10 to 20%, P = 1.43 × 10−8) and SHBG (7% mediated, 95% CI 1 to 12%, P = 1.81 × 10−2) in the relationship between BMI and endometrial cancer risk. Conclusions Our comprehensive MR analysis provides insight into potential causal mechanisms linking BMI with endometrial cancer risk and suggests targeting of insulinemic and hormonal traits as a potential strategy for the prevention of endometrial cancer.

Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have revealed sixteen risk loci for endoemtrial cancer but the identification of candidate susceptibility genes remains challenging. Here, we perform transcriptome-wide association study (TWAS) analyses using the largest endometrial cancer GWAS and gene expression from six relevant tissues, prioritizing eight candidate endometrial cancer susceptibility genes, one of which (EEFSEC) is located at a potentially novel endometrial cancer risk locus. We also show evidence of biologically relevant tissue-specific expression associations for CYP19A1 (adipose), HEY2 (ovary) and SKAP1 (whole blood). A phenome-wide association study demonstrates associations of candidate susceptibility genes with anthropometric, cardiovascular, diabetes, bone health and sex hormone traits that are related to endometrial cancer risk factors. Lastly, analysis of TWAS data highlights candidate compounds for endometrial cancer repurposing. In summary, this study reveals endometrial cancer susceptibility genes, including those with evidence of tissue specificity, providing insights into endometrial cancer aetiology and avenues for therapeutic development., Pik Fang Kho et al. conduct multi-tissue transcriptome-wide association studies of endometrial cancer risk. Their results identify potential susceptibility genes for endometrial cancer, and provide avenues for the development of future treatments for this disease.

Simple Summary The causal impact of body fat distribution on female-specific cancers is largely unknown. For the first time we used a two-sample multivariable Mendelian randomization (MR) approach to elucidate the role and causal relations of body composition assessed by segmental bioelectrical impedance analysis on the risks of breast, endometrial and ovarian cancers and their subtypes. We found that abdominal fat content increases the risk for ovarian cancer and its endometrioid and clear cell subtypes independent of overall fat content. General adiposity has a protective effect on risk of breast cancer and its ER- and ER+ subtypes but increases the risk for endometrial cancer, ovarian cancer, and the endometrioid ovarian cancer subtype. This study extends the literature by addressing specifically the causal role of visceral fat on female-specific cancers. Abstract Background: Mounting evidence shows that adiposity increases female-specific cancer risk, but the role of body fat distribution is less clear. We used a two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) approach to elucidate causal relations of body fat distribution to the risks of breast, endometrial and ovarian cancers and their subtypes. Methods: Body composition was assessed using segmental bioelectrical impedance analysis, yielding trunk, arm, and leg fat ratios (TFR, AFR, LFR) and BMI including 195,043 and 434,794 European women, respectively. The sample sizes for the outcomes ranged between 58,396 and 228,951. Causal effects were estimated per one standard deviation increment in the respective exposure within the radial regression framework. Robust sensitivity analyses were performed to verify MR assumptions. In a multivariable MR setting, the proportion of risk attributable to overall and abdominal fat content was assessed. Results: TFR, which represents abdominal fat content, was associated with ovarian cancer and its clear cell and endometrioid histotypes independent of overall fat content. BMI was inversely associated with breast cancer and its ER− and ER+ subtypes, but positively with endometrial cancer and ovarian cancer, including its endometrioid histotype. These estimates were confirmed using AFR as proxy for overall body fat. Conclusions: Visceral adiposity seems to be a driver of elevated ovarian cancer risk, particularly of the endometrioid and clear cell ovarian cancer histotypes. General adiposity decreases the risk of breast cancer but increases the risk of endometrial and ovarian cancer.

We have performed genetic correlation and Mendelian randomization analyses using publicly available genome-wide association study (GWAS) data to identify endometrial cancer risk factors. These and previously established risk factors of endometrial cancer were then included in a multi-trait Bayesian GWAS analysis to detect endometrial cancer susceptibility variants, identifying three novel loci (7q22.1, 8q24.3 and 16q12.2); two of which were replicated in an independent endometrial cancer GWAS dataset. These loci are hypothesized to affect endometrial cancer risk through altered sex-hormone levels or through effects on obesity. Consistent with this hypothesis, several genes with established roles in these pathways (CYP11B1, CYP3A7, IRX3 and IRX5) were prioritized as candidate endometrial cancer risk genes by interrogation of quantitative trait loci data and chromatin capture assays in endometrial cell lines. The findings of this study identify additional opportunities for hormone treatment and further support weight loss to reduce the risk of developing endometrial cancer.Statement of SignificanceThis study prioritizes four genes related to testosterone and obesity as candidate endometrial cancer risk genes, as well as identifies additional opportunities for hormone treatment and further supports weight loss to reduce endometrial cancer risk.

Genome-wide association studies (GWASs) have identified thousands of cancer risk loci revealing many risk regions shared across multiple cancers. Characterizing the cross-cancer shared genetic basis can increase our understanding of global mechanisms of cancer development. In this study, we collected GWAS summary statistics based on up to 375,468 cancer cases and 530,521 controls for fourteen types of cancer, including breast (overall, estrogen receptor [ER]-positive, and ER-negative), colorectal, endometrial, esophageal, glioma, head/neck, lung, melanoma, ovarian, pancreatic, prostate, and renal cancer, to characterize the shared genetic basis of cancer risk. We identified thirteen pairs of cancers with statistically significant local genetic correlations across eight distinct genomic regions. Specifically, the 5p15.33 region, harboring the TERT and CLPTM1L genes, showed statistically significant local genetic correlations for multiple cancer pairs. We conducted a cross-cancer fine-mapping of the 5p15.33 region based on eight cancers that showed genome-wide significant associations in this region (ER-negative breast, colorectal, glioma, lung, melanoma, ovarian, pancreatic, and prostate cancer). We used an iterative analysis pipeline implementing a subset-based meta-analysis approach based on cancer-specific conditional analyses and identified ten independent cross-cancer associations within this region. For each signal, we conducted cross-cancer fine-mapping to prioritize the most plausible causal variants. Our findings provide a more in-depth understanding of the shared inherited basis across human cancers and expand our knowledge of the 5p15.33 region in carcinogenesis.

An amendment to this paper has been published and can be accessed via the original article.