Search

Background: We hypothesized that unstable clinical presentation of coronary artery disease is associated with distinct characteristics of culprit lesions identifiable by multislice computed tomography (MSCT). Methods: Patients with non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) (n = 57) or stable angina (SA) pectoris (n = 19) were studied. Coronary culprit lesions in patients with NSTEMI and symptomatic lesions in patients with SA were evaluated with 64-slice MSCT and a volumetric plaque imaging tool. Plaque volumes of lipid, fibrous tissue, or calcification according to signal intensity were determined. Plaque burden, mean signal intensity of the lesions, relative volumetric distribution of plaque components, and remodeling index were measured. Results: Volumetric plaque burden of study lesions were similar in the 2 patient groups (P = .38). Mean signal intensity of study lesions were lower in patients with NSTEMI compared with patients with SA (74 [66-97] Hounsfield units vs 99 [77-154] Hounsfield units, P = .02). The volume of plaque occupied by calcified material was lower in patients with NSTEMI compared with patients with SA (15 mm(3) [3-58 mm(3)] vs 42 mm(3) [18-82 mm(3)], P = .045). In patients with NSTEMI, the lipid-rich plaque subtype was more frequent than in patients with SA, and the calcified plaque subtype was less frequent in patients with NSTEMI than in patients with SA (P = .032). Positive remodeling was observed in 19% of patients with NSTEMI, whereas this was absent in patients with SA (P = .04). Conclusion: Volumetric measurements with MSCT revealed that coronary culprit lesions in acute coronary syndrome frequently display low mean plaque signal intensity values, lipid-rich plaque subtype, and positive remodeling. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is a common inherited cardiac disease, and clinical and genetic family screening is recommended by guidelines., Objectives: This study sought to investigate the diagnostic yield of screening relatives of HCM patients and identify predictive factors for HCM development during long-term follow-up in relatives from gene-elusive families., Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of families screened at clinics for inherited cardiomyopathies in Eastern Denmark, from 2006 to 2023., Results: We included 1,230 relatives (55% female; age: 42 ± 17 years) from 531 families. The combined clinical and genetic yield at baseline was 26% (n = 321). After 7 years (mean) of follow-up (6,762 person-years), 43 (4%) additional relatives developed HCM. The strongest predictors of developing HCM were carrying a likely pathogenic/pathogenic variant (HR: 4.58; 95% CI: 2.50-8.40; P < 0.001) and larger left ventricular maximum wall thickness (MWT) (HR: 2.21 per mm; 95% CI: 1.76-2.77 per mm; P < 0.001). In gene-elusive families, we found that an MWT of ≥10 mm represented the optimal classification threshold for developing HCM (area under the curve: 0.80), with only 2 (0.4%) relatives from gene-elusive families with an MWT of <10 mm developing HCM during follow-up., Conclusions: In HCM, the diagnostic yield of a single screening visit was 1 in 4, and the additional yield during 7 years of follow-up was 4%. Gene carriers and relatives from gene-elusive families with a baseline MWT of ≥10 mm were at the highest risk of developing HCM during follow-up. These findings may inform future recommendations on the management of relatives of HCM patients., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures The study was supported by Rigshospitalet Research Council. The funder had no part in the design of the study, the collection, analysis, or interpretation of data or publication. The authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2024 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Pleural effusion is present in 50% to 80% of patients with acute heart failure, depending on image modality. We aim to describe the association between the presence and size of pleural effusion and central hemodynamics, including pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) in an advanced heart failure population., Methods: An observational, cross-sectional study in a cohort of patients with advanced heart failure (left ventricular ejection fraction ≤45%) who underwent right heart catheterization at The Department of Cardiology at Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Denmark, between January 1, 2002 and October 31, 2020. The presence and size of pleural effusion were determined by a semiquantitative score of chest x -rays or computed tomography scans performed within 2 days of right heart catheterization., Results: In 346 patients (50±13 years; 78% males) with median left ventricular ejection fraction of 20% (15-25), we identified 162 (47%) with pleural effusion. The pleural effusion size was medium in 38 (24%) and large in 30 (19%). Patients with pleural effusion had a 4.3 mm Hg (2.5-6.1) higher PCWP and 2.4 mm Hg (1.2-3.6) higher central venous pressure ( P <0.001 for both). Patients with a medium/large pleural effusion had statistically significantly higher filling pressures than patients with a small effusion. Higher PCWP (odds ratio [OR], 1.06 [1.03-1.10]) and central venous pressure (OR, 1.09 [1.05-1.15]) were associated with pleural effusion in multivariable logistic regression adjusted for age, sex, and heart failure medications ( P <0.001 for both). In a subgroup of 204 (63%) patients with serum albumin data, PCWP (OR, 1.06 [1.01-1.11]; P =0.032), central venous pressure (OR, 1.14 [1.06-1.23]; P <0.001) and serum albumin level (OR, 0.89 [0.83-0.95]; P <0.001) were independently associated with the presence of a medium/large-sized pleural effusion., Conclusions: In patients with left ventricular ejection fraction ≤45% undergoing right heart catheterization as part of advanced heart failure work-up, pleural effusion was associated with higher PCWP and central venous pressure and lower serum albumin., Competing Interests: Drs Glargaard, Deis, Abild-Nielsen, Stark, Thomsen, Kristensen, Rossing, and Thune declare no relationship with the industry. Dr Gustafsson is an advisor for Abbott, Alnylam, Pfizer, Ionis, Bayer, AdjuCor, Corwave, FineHeart, and AstraZeneca and has received speaker fees from Novartis, all outside the current work.

Aims: Although body mass index (BMI) is the most commonly used anthropometric measure to assess adiposity, alternative indices such as the waist-to-height ratio may better reflect the location and amount of ectopic fat as well as the weight of the skeleton., Methods and Results: The prognostic value of several alternative anthropometric measures was compared with that of BMI in 1116 patients with non-ischaemic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) enrolled in DANISH. The association between anthropometric measures and all-cause death was adjusted for prognostic variables, including natriuretic peptides. Median follow-up was 9.5 years (25th-75th percentile, 7.9-10.9). Compared to patients with a BMI 18.5-24.9 kg/m 2 (n = 363), those with a BMI ≥25 kg/m 2 had a higher risk of all-cause and cardiovascular death, although this association was only statistically significant for a BMI ≥35 kg/m 2 (n = 91) (all-cause death: hazard ratio [HR] 1.78, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.28-2.48; cardiovascular death: HR 2.46, 95% CI 1.69-3.58). Compared to a BMI 18.5-24.9 kg/m 2 , a BMI <18.5 kg/m 2 (n = 24) was associated with a numerically, but not a significantly, higher risk of all-cause and cardiovascular death. Greater waist-to-height ratio (as an exemplar of indices not incorporating weight) was also associated with a higher risk of all-cause and cardiovascular death (HR for the highest vs. the lowest quintile: all-cause death: HR 2.11, 95% CI 1.53-2.92; cardiovascular death: HR 2.17, 95% CI 1.49-3.15)., Conclusion: In patients with non-ischaemic HFrEF, there was a clear association between greater adiposity and higher long-term mortality., Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00542945., (© 2024 The Author(s). European Journal of Heart Failure published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Society of Cardiology.)

Background: Cardiac involvement represents a major cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM1) and prevention of sudden cardiac death (SCD) is a central part of patient care. We investigated the natural history of cardiac involvement in patients with DM1 to provide an evidence-based foundation for adjustment of follow-up protocols., Methods: Patients with genetically confirmed DM1 were identified. Data on patient characteristics, performed investigations (12 lead ECG, Holter monitoring and echocardiography), and clinical outcomes were retrospectively collected from electronic health records., Results: We included 195 patients (52% men) with a mean age at baseline evaluation of 41 years (range 14-79). The overall prevalence of cardiac involvement increased from 42% to 66% after a median follow-up of 10.5 years. There was a male predominance for cardiac involvement at end of follow-up (74 vs. 44%, p < 0.001). The most common types of cardiac involvement were conduction abnormalities (48%), arrhythmias (35%), and left ventricular systolic dysfunction (21%). Only 17% of patients reported cardiac symptoms. The standard 12‑lead ECG was the most sensitive diagnostic modality and documented cardiac involvement in 24% at baseline and in 49% at latest follow-up. However, addition of Holter monitoring and echocardiography significantly increased the diagnostic yield with 18 and 13% points at baseline and latest follow-up, respectively. Despite surveillance 35 patients (18%) died during follow-up; seven due to SCD., Conclusions: In patients with DM1 cardiac involvement was highly prevalent and developed during follow-up. These findings justify lifelong follow-up with ECG, Holter, and echocardiography., Clinical Perspective: What is new? What are the clinical implications?, Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest None., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Aims: Current guidelines recommend implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy in patients with heart failure, a left ventricular ejection fraction of ≤35%, and New York Heart Association (NYHA) class II-III. However, the evidence regarding the benefit of primary prevention ICD is less consistent in patients with NYHA class III. We investigated the long-term effects of primary prevention ICD implantation according to NYHA class in an extended follow-up study of the DANISH trial., Methods and Results: The DANISH trial randomized 1116 patients with non-ischaemic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) to ICD implantation or usual care. Outcomes were analysed according to NYHA class at baseline (NYHA class II and III/IV). The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. Of the 1116 patients randomized in the DANISH trial, 597 (53.5%) were in NYHA class II at baseline, 505 (45.3%) in NYHA class III, and 14 (1.3%) in NYHA class IV. During a median follow-up of 9.5 years, NYHA class III/IV, compared with NYHA class II, were associated with a greater long-term rate of all-cause mortality (hazard ratio [HR] 1.52, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.20-1.93) and cardiovascular death (HR 1.95 [1.47-2.60]). ICD implantation, compared with usual care, did not reduce the long-term rate of all-cause mortality (all participants: HR 0.89 [95% CI 0.74-1.08]; NYHA class II: HR 0.85 [0.64-1.13]; NYHA class III/IV: HR 0.89 [0.69-1.14]; p interaction  = 0.78) or cardiovascular death (all participants: HR 0.87 [95% CI 0.70-1.09]; NYHA class II: HR 0.78 [0.54-1.12]; NYHA class III/IV: HR 0.89 [0.67-1.19]; p interaction  = 0.58), irrespective of NYHA class. Similarly, NYHA class did not modify the beneficial effects of ICD implantation on sudden cardiovascular death (all participants: HR 0.60 [95% CI 0.40-0.92]; NYHA class II: HR 0.73 [0.40-1.36]; NYHA class III/IV: HR 0.52 [0.29-0.94]; p interaction  = 0.39)., Conclusions: In patients with non-ischaemic HFrEF, ICD implantation, compared with usual care, did not reduce the overall mortality rate, but it did reduce sudden cardiovascular death, regardless of baseline NYHA class., Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00542945., (© 2024 The Authors. European Journal of Heart Failure published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Society of Cardiology.)

Background: Elite endurance training is characterised by a high-volume load of the heart and has been associated with atrial fibrillation (AF) in middle-aged men. We compared left atrial (LA) remodelling among elite athletes engaged in sports, categorised as having low, intermediate, and high cardiac demands., Methods: This cross-sectional echocardiographic study of healthy elite athletes evaluated LA size and function measured as LA maximum volume (maxLAVi) and contraction strain. Athletes were grouped according to the cardiac demands of their sport (low, intermediate, high). Morphological measures were indexed to body surface area and reported as least square means; differences between groups were reported with 95% CIs., Results: We included 482 elite athletes (age 21±5 years (mean±SD), 39% women). MaxLAVi was larger in the high group (28.4 mL/m 2 ) compared with the low group (20.2 mL/m 2 ; difference: 8.2, CI 5.3 to 11.1 mL/m 2 ; p<0.001), where measurements in men exceed those in women (26.4 mL/m 2 vs 24.7 mL/m 2 ; difference 1.6 mL/m 2 ; CI 0.3 to 2.9 mL/m 2 ; p=0.0175). In the high group, LA contraction strain was lower compared with the low group (-10.1% vs -12.9%; difference: 2.8%; CI 1.3 to 4.3%; p<0.001), and men had less LA contraction strain compared with women (-10.3% vs -11.0%; difference 0.7%; CI 0.0 to 1.4%; p=0.049). Years in training did not affect maxLAVi or LA contraction strain., Conclusion: MaxLAVi was higher while LA contraction strain was lower with increased cardiac demands. MaxLAVi was larger, and LA contraction was lower in men compared with women. Whether these sex-based differences in LA remodelling are a precursor to pathological remodelling in male athletes is unknown., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Background: The Heart Failure Collaboratory (HFC) score integrates types and dosages of guideline-directed pharmacotherapies for heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). We examined the effects of cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) implantation according to the modified HFC (mHFC) score in 1116 patients with nonischemic HFrEF from the Danish Study to Assess the Efficacy of ICDs in Patients with Nonischemic Systolic HF on Mortality (DANISH)., Methods and Results: Patients were assigned scores for renin-angiotensin-system inhibitors, beta-blockers and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (0, no use; 1, < 50% of maximum dosage; 2, ≥ 50% of maximum dosage). The maximum score was 6, corresponding to ≥ 50% of maximum dosage for all therapies. The median baseline mHFC score was 4, and the median follow-up was 9.5 years. Compared with an mHFC score of 3-4, an mHFC score of 1-2 was associated with a higher rate of all-cause death (mHFC = 1-2: adjusted HR 1.67 [95% CI, 1.23-2.28]; mHFC = 3-4, reference; mHFC = 5-6: adjusted HR 1.07 [95% CI, 0.87-1.31]). ICD implantation did not reduce all-cause death compared with control (reference) (HR 0.89 [95% CI, 0.74-1.08]), regardless of mHFC score (mHFC = 1-2: HR 0.98 [95% CI, 0.56-1.71]; mHFC = 3-4: HR 0.89 [95% CI,0.66-1.20]; mHFC = 5-6: HR 0.85 [95% CI, 0.64-1.12]; P interaction , 0.65). Similarly, ICD implantation did not reduce cardiovascular death (HR 0.87 [95% CI, 0.70-1.09]), regardless of mHFC score (P interaction , 0.59). The ICD group had a lower rate of sudden cardiovascular death (HR, 0.60 [95% CI,0.40-0.92]); this association was not modified by mHFC score (P interaction , 0.35)., Conclusions: Lower mHFC scores were associated with higher rates of all-cause death. ICD implantation did not result in an overall survival benefit in patients with nonischemic HFrEF, regardless of mHFC score., Competing Interests: Disclosures JJT reports speaker's fees from Astra Zeneca and BMS and travel grants from AstraZeneca. JCN reports grants from the Novo Nordisk Foundation and Danish Heart Foundation outside the submitted work. NEB reports grants from the Novo Nordisk Foundation, the Augustinus Foundation, Health Insurance Denmark, and the Kaj Hansen Foundation, not related to this work. FG is an aAdvisor to Abbott, Ionis, Alnylam, AstraZeneca, Bayer, and Pfizer and is a speaker at Novartis. CH reports research grants from the Novo Nordisk Foundation, Lundbeck Foundation, and the Danish Heart Foundation (not related to this work). JHS reports a research grant from Medtronic (outside of this work) and speaker's fee from Medtronic and is a member of the Advisory Board for Medtronic and for Vital Beats. SP reports a travel grant from Abbott. LK reports speaker's honoraria from AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer, Novartis, and Novo Nordisk. JHB reports advisory board honoraria from AstraZeneca and Bayer, consultant honoraria from Novartis and AstraZeneca and travel grants from AstraZeneca. All other authors have no disclosures., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Aims: While computed tomography (CT) is widely acknowledged as superior to chest radiographs for acute diagnostics, its efficacy in diagnosing acute heart failure (AHF) remains unexplored. This prospective study included consecutive patients with dyspnoea undergoing simultaneous low-dose chest CT (LDCT) and chest radiographs. Here, we aimed to determine if LDCT is superior to chest radiographs to confirm pulmonary congestion in dyspnoeic patients with suspected AHF., Methods and Results: An observational, prospective study, including dyspnoeic patients from the emergency department. All patients underwent concurrent clinical examination, laboratory tests, echocardiogram, chest radiographs, and LDCT. The primary efficacy measure to compare the two radiological methods was conditional odds ratio (cOR). The primary outcome was adjudicated AHF, ascertained by comprehensive expert consensus. The secondary outcome, echo-bnp AHF, was an objective AHF diagnosis based on echocardiographic cardiac dysfunction, elevated cardiac filling pressure, loop diuretic administration, and NT-pro brain natriuretic peptide > 300 pg/mL. Of 228 dyspnoeic patients, 64 patients (28%) had adjudicated AHF, and 79 patients (35%) had echo-bnp AHF. Patients with AHF were older (78 years vs. 73 years), had lower left ventricular ejection fraction (36% vs. 55%), had higher elevated left ventricular filling pressures (98% vs. 18%), and had higher NT-pro brain natriuretic peptide levels (3628 pg/mL vs. 470 pg/mL). The odds to diagnose adjudicated AHF and echo-bnp AHF were up to four times greater using LDCT (cOR: 3.89 [2.15, 7.06] and cOR: 2.52 [1.45, 4.38], respectively). For each radiologic sign of pulmonary congestion, the LDCT provided superior or equivalent results as the chest radiographs, and the interrater agreement was higher using LDCT (kappa 0.88 [95% CI: 0.81, 0.95] vs. 0.73 [95% CI: 0.63, 0.82]). As first-line imaging modality, LDCT will find one additional adjudicated AHF in 12.5 patients and prevent one false-positive in 20 patients. Similar results were demonstrated for echo-bnp AHF., Conclusions: In consecutive dyspnoeic patients admitted to the emergency department, LDCT is significantly better than chest radiographs in detecting pulmonary congestion., (© 2024 The Authors. ESC Heart Failure published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Society of Cardiology.)

Background: Changes in QRS duration (∆QRS) are often used in the clinical setting to evaluate the effect of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), although an association between ∆QRS and outcomes is not firmly established. We aimed to assess the association between mortality and ∆QRS after CRT in patients from the DANISH (Danish Study to Assess the Efficacy of ICDs in Patients with Non-Ischemic Systolic Heart Failure on Mortality) study., Methods: We included all patients from DANISH who received a CRT device and had available QRS duration data before and after implantation. Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess associations between ∆QRS (post-CRT QRS minus pre-CRT QRS) and mortality., Results: Complete data were available in 572 patients. Median baseline QRS duration was 160 ms (IQR [146;180]). Post-CRT QRS was recorded a median of 48 days (IQR [33;86]) after implantation, and the median ∆QRS was -14 ms (IQR [-38;-3]). During a median follow-up of 4.1 years (IQR [2.5;5.8]), 106 patients died. In crude Cox regression, all-cause mortality was reduced by 6% per 10 ms shortening of QRS (HR 0.94; CI: 0.88-1.00, p = 0.04). The effect did not remain significant after multivariable adjustment (HR 1.01, CI: 0.93-1.10, p = 0.77). Further, no association was found between ∆QRS and improvement of New York Heart Association functional class at 6 months (OR 1.03, CI: 0.96-1.10, p = 0.42)., Conclusion: In a large cohort of patients with non-ischemic cardiomyopathy, reduction of QRS duration after CRT was not associated with changes in mortality during long-term follow-up., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest Casper Lund-Andersen has received a grant from Innovation fund Denmark and has received travel grants from St. Jude Medical and Medtronic (outside of this study). Adelina Yafasova has received a grant from the Foundation of Rigshospitalet (outside of this study). Jesper Hastrup Svendsen has received grants from Medtronic outside this study and is a member of an advisory board in Medtronic. Jens Cosedis Nielsen has received a grant from the Novo Nordisk Foundation outside of this study (NNF16OC0018658). Lars Køber has received grants from Astra Zeneca, Bayer, Boehringer, Novartis and Novo Nordisk. Finn Gustafsson has received speaker's fees from Pfizer and Novartis and is a member of advisory boards in Abbott, Ionis, Alnylam, AstraZeneca, and Bayer. All remaining authors have declared no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Patients with heart failure and chronic kidney disease (CKD) may have an increased risk of death from causes competing with arrhythmic death, which could have implications for the efficacy of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs). We examined the long-term effects of primary prophylactic ICD implantation, compared with usual care, according to baseline CKD status in an extended follow-up study of DANISH (Danish Study to Assess the Efficacy of ICDs in Patients With Nonischemic Systolic Heart Failure on Mortality)., Methods and Results: In the DANISH trial, 1116 patients with nonischemic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction were randomized to receive an ICD (N=556) or usual care (N=550). Outcomes were analyzed according to CKD status (estimated glomerular filtration rate ≥/<60 mL/min per 1.73 m 2 ) at baseline. In total, 1113 patients had an available estimated glomerular filtration rate measurement at baseline (median estimated glomerular filtration rate 73 mL/min per 1.73 m 2 ), and 316 (28%) had CKD. During a median follow-up of 9.5 years, ICD implantation, compared with usual care, did not reduce the rate of all-cause mortality (no CKD, HR, 0.82 [95% CI, 0.64-1.04]; CKD, HR, 1.02 [95% CI, 0.75-1.38]; P interaction =0.31) or cardiovascular death (no CKD, HR, 0.77 [95% CI, 0.58-1.03]; CKD, HR, 1.05 [95% CI, 0.73-1.51]; P interaction =0.20), irrespective of baseline CKD status. Similarly, baseline CKD status did not modify the beneficial effects of ICD implantation on sudden cardiovascular death (no CKD, HR, 0.57 [95% CI, 0.32-1.00]; CKD, HR, 0.65 [95% CI, 0.34-1.24]; P interaction =0.70)., Conclusions: ICD implantation, compared with usual care, did not reduce the overall mortality rate, but it did reduce the rate of sudden cardiovascular death, regardless of baseline kidney function in patients with nonischemic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction., Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT00542945.

Introduction: Pleural effusion is present in half of the patients hospitalised with acute heart failure. The condition is treated with diuretics and/or therapeutic thoracentesis for larger effusions. No evidence from randomised trials or guidelines supports thoracentesis to alleviate pleural effusion due to acute heart failure. The Thoracentesis to Alleviate cardiac Pleural effusion Interventional Trial (TAP-IT) will investigate if a strategy of referring patients with acute heart failure and pleural effusion to up-front thoracentesis by pleural pigtail catheter insertion in addition to pharmacological therapy compared with pharmacological therapy alone can increase the number of days the participants are alive and not hospitalised during the 90 days following randomisation., Methods and Analysis: TAP-IT is a pragmatic, multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial aiming to include 126 adult patients with left ventricular ejection fraction ≤45% and a non-negligible pleural effusion due to heart failure. Participants will be randomised 1:1, stratified according to site and anticoagulant treatment, and assigned to referral to up-front ultrasound-guided pleural pigtail catheter thoracentesis in addition to standard pharmacological therapy or to standard pharmacological therapy only. Thoracentesis is performed according to local guidelines and can be performed in participants in the pharmacological treatment arm if their condition deteriorates or if no significant improvement is observed within 5 days. The primary endpoint is how many days participants are alive and not hospitalised within 90 days from randomisation and will be analysed in the intention-to-treat population. Key secondary outcomes include 90-day mortality, complications, readmissions, and quality of life., Ethics and Dissemination: The study has been approved by the Capital Region of Denmark Scientific Ethical Committee (H-20060817) and Knowledge Center for Data Reviews (P-2021-149). All participants will sign an informed consent form. Enrolment began in August 2021. Regardless of the nature, results will be published in a peer-reviewed medical journal., Trial Registration Number: NCT05017753., Competing Interests: Competing interests: AB has received speaker fees from AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer and Novartis unrelated to this study. CT received speakers and consultancy fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, Beyer A/S and Novartis A/S outside of this study. CAB has been a member of the Bayer and Boehringer Ingelheim advisory boards. LK has received speaker fees from AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer and Novartis unrelated to this project. JJT has received speaker fees from AstraZeneca and Pfizer unrelated to this project., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Purpose: To identify the cause of discrepancy between the INHERIT trial and VANISH trial in regards to disease modification of angiotensin receptor II blockers in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM)., Methods: We replicated the data analysis used in VANISH, converting individual change in each component of the composite endpoint into a z-score and applying this z-score to the INHERIT results., Results: No significant improvement was identified in the composite z-score between the 2 groups at 12-month follow-up (P = .4). With the exception of tissue Doppler systolic (s') velocity, we found no significant benefit or harm from losartan compared to placebo for any of the individual components of the composite score at 12-month follow-up. Results were similar in analyses without imputed data or when restricted to patients with sarcomeric HCM., Conclusion: Despite applying the potentially more sensitive composite z-score endpoint as in the VANISH trial, no statistically significant benefits from the use of losartan compared to placebo could be detected at 12-month follow-up in patients with overt HCM participating in the INHERIT trial., (Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Competing Interests: Disclosures Dr Butt reports advisory board honoraria from Bayer and AstraZeneca, consultant honoraria from Novartis and AstraZeneca, and travel grants from AstraZeneca outside this work. Dr Nielsen reports grant from the Novo Nordisk Foundation (NNF16OC0018658 and NNF17OC0029148) outside this work. Dr Brandes reports lecture honoraria from Boehringer Ingelheim and Bristol-Myers Squibb, as well as research grants from Theravance, the Zealand Region, Canadian Institutes of Health Research, and the Danish Heart Foundation outside this work. Dr Svendsen reports institutional research grants from Medtronic, speaker fees from Medtronic, and membership in a Medtronic advisory board outside this work. Dr Hassager reports research grants from Novo Nordisk Foundation, Lundbeck Foundation, and The Danish Heart Foundation outside this work. Dr Gustafsson reports advisory roles for Abbott, Alnylam, Ionis, Pfizer, Bayer, FineHeart, and Corwave and speaker fees from Orion pharma, AstraZeneca, and Novartis outside this work. Dr Pehrson reports lecture fees from Bayer, BMS, and Abbott, as well as travel grants from Johnson & Johnson. The other authors report no conflicts.

Competing Interests: Disclosures Dr Butt reports advisory board honoraria from Bayer, consultant honoraria from Novartis and AstraZeneca, and travel grants from AstraZeneca, outside the submitted work. Dr Nielsen reports grants from the Novo Nordisk Foundation (NNF16OC0018658 and NNF17OC0029148), outside the submitted work. Dr Kristensen reports advisory honoraria from Bayer and AstraZeneca, outside the submitted work. Dr Svendsen reports honoraria from Medtronic (speaker fee and membership of advisory committee) and research grant from Medtronic, outside the submitted work. Dr Pehrson reports honoraria (speaker fees) from AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, and Abbott, outside the submitted work. Dr Hassager reports grants from the Novo Nordisk Foundation, the Lundbeck Foundation, and the Danish Heart Foundation, outside the submitted work. Dr Bruun reports grants from the Novo Nordisk Foundation, Health Insurance Denmark, the Augustinus Foundation, and the Kaj Hansen Foundation, outside the submitted work. Dr Gustafsson reports research grants from Pfizer and the Novo Nordisk Foundation, advisory board honoraria from Bayer, Pfizer, Abbott, Ionis, and Alnylam, and speakers’ fee from AstraZeneca, Novartis, and Orion Pharma, outside the submitted work. The other authors report no conflicts.

Background: The mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) eplerenone and spironolactone are beneficial in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), but have not been prospectively compared. We compared clinical outcomes, daily dosages, and discontinuation rates for the two drugs in a nationwide cohort., Methods: We identified all patients with HFrEF in the period 2016-2020, who were alive and had initiated MRA treatment at study start, 180 days after HF diagnosis. We estimated the 2-year risk of a composite of death and HF hospitalization, as well as each component separately, using Kaplan-Meier, cumulative incidence functions, and Cox proportional hazards models adjusted for age, sex, and comorbidities. Secondly, we assessed treatment withdrawal, cross-over, and daily drug dosage., Results: We included 7479 patients; 653 (9%) on eplerenone and 6840 (91%) on spironolactone. Patients in the eplerenone group were younger (median age 65 vs. 69 years), and more often men (91% vs. 68%), both P < 0.001. In adjusted analyses, with spironolactone as reference, there were no differences in the risk of the composite of all-cause death and HF hospitalization (HR 1.02, 95% CI 0.82-1.27), all-cause death (HR 0.93, 95% CI 0.67-1.30), or HF hospitalization (HR 1.10, 95% CI 0.84-1.42). Treatment withdrawal occurred in 34% in the eplerenone group and 53% in the spironolactone group (P < 0.001), treatment cross-over in 3%, and 10%, respectively. Daily dose >25 mg at 12 months, was observed in 230 patients (37%) in the eplerenone group and 771 patients (12%) in the spironolactone (P < 0.001)., Conclusions: In a contemporary nationwide cohort of patients with new-onset HFrEF who initiated MRA, we found no differences in clinical outcomes associated with initiation of eplerenone vs. spironolactone. Treatment was more frequently withdrawn, and daily drug dosage was lower among patients treated with spironolactone., (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.)

Background: Reduced systolic myocardial function in the inferior region of the left ventricle has been suggested to be associated with malignant arrhythmias. We tested this hypothesis in patients with non-ischemic heart failure., Methods: Patients with non-ischemic heart failure (left ventricular ejection fraction [LVEF] < 35%) were evaluated by 2D-speckle-tracking echocardiography. The regional longitudinal strain was calculated for each of the six left ventricular walls. The reduced regional function was defined as strain below the median. The outcome was a composite of sudden cardiac death, admission with sustained ventricular arrhythmia, resuscitated cardiac arrest, and appropriate therapy from a primary prophylactic implantable cardioverter defibrillator. Time-to-first-event analysis was performed using a Cox model., Results: From two centers, 401 patients were included (median age: 63 years, 72% male) with a median LVEF of 25% (interquartile range [IQR] 20;30), and a median inferior wall strain of -9.0% (-12.5; -5.4). During a median follow-up of 4.0 years, 52 outcomes occurred. After multivariate adjustment for clinical and electrocardiographic parameters, inferior wall strain was independently associated with the outcome (HR 2.50 [1.35; 4.62], p = .003). No independent association was found between the composite outcome and reduced strain in any of the other left ventricular walls, Global Longitudinal Strain (HR 1.66 [0.93; 2.98], p = .09), or LVEF (HR 1.33 [0.75; 2.33], p = .33)., Conclusions: Below median strain in the left ventricular inferior region was independently associated with a 2.5-fold increase in the risk of malignant arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death in patients with non-ischemic heart failure., (© 2023 The Authors. Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Background: Patients with nonischemic systolic heart failure have an increased risk of malignant ventricular arrhythmias and sudden cardiovascular death. Because the risk is less pronounced than for patients with ischemic cause of heart failure more discriminating tools are needed to identify patients most likely to benefit from implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) implantation. Right ventricular (RV) dysfunction is associated with a worse prognosis, but whether RV free wall strain (RV-FWS) measured with echocardiography can identify the patients most likely to benefit from ICD implantation is not known., Methods and Results: In this extended follow-up analysis of the Danish Study to Assess the Efficacy of ICDs in Patients with Non-ischemic Systolic Heart Failure on Mortality (DANISH) trial, RV-FWS was measured with echocardiography in 445 patients before randomization. RV dysfunction was defined as an RV-FWS of greater than -20%. The primary end point was all-cause mortality. The median RV-FWS was -18% (quartiles -23% to -14%), and RV dysfunction was measured in 255 patients (57%). During a median follow-up of 5.7 years, 170 patients (38%) died. There was a statistically significant interaction between RV dysfunction and the effect of ICD implantation (P = .003), also after adjusting for known cardiovascular risk factors (P = .01). ICD implantation significantly decreased all-cause mortality in patients with RV dysfunction (hazard ratio 0.54, 95% confidence interval 0.36-0.80, P = .002), but not in patients with normal RV function (hazard ratio 1.34, 95% confidence interval 0.84-2.12, P = .22)., Conclusions: In patients with nonischemic systolic heart failure, RV dysfunction on echocardiography was associated with a greater effect of ICD implantation and could be used to select patients with benefit from ICD treatment., Competing Interests: Conflicts of interest Dr. Elming, Dr. Jensen, Dr. Winsløw, Dr. Yafasova, Dr. Risum, Dr Haarbo, Dr. Philbert, Dr. Pehrson and Dr. Thune all report no conflicts of interest. Dr. Butt reports advisory board honoraria from Bayer, outside the submitted work. Dr. Svendsen reports membership of advisory board for Medtronic, research grant from Medtronic, and speaker fee from Medtronic, all outside the submitted work. DR. Køber reports speaker honorarium from Novo, Novartis, AstraZeneca, Boehringer, and Bayer, unrelated to this manuscript., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Guidelines recommend active fever prevention for 72 hours after cardiac arrest. Data from randomized clinical trials of this intervention have been lacking., Methods: We randomly assigned comatose patients who had been resuscitated after an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest of presumed cardiac cause to device-based temperature control targeting 36°C for 24 hours followed by targeting of 37°C for either 12 or 48 hours (for total intervention times of 36 and 72 hours, respectively) or until the patient regained consciousness. The primary outcome was a composite of death from any cause or hospital discharge with a Cerebral Performance Category of 3 or 4 (range, 1 to 5, with higher scores indicating more severe disability; a category of 3 or 4 indicates severe cerebral disability or coma) within 90 days after randomization. Secondary outcomes included death from any cause and the Montreal Cognitive Assessment score (range, 0 to 30, with higher scores indicating better cognitive ability) at 3 months., Results: A total of 393 patients were randomly assigned to temperature control for 36 hours, and 396 patients were assigned to temperature control for 72 hours. At 90 days after randomization, a primary end-point event had occurred in 127 of 393 patients (32.3%) in the 36-hour group and in 133 of 396 patients (33.6%) in the 72-hour group (hazard ratio, 0.99; 95% confidence interval, 0.77 to 1.26; P = 0.70) and mortality was 29.5% in the 36-hour group and 30.3% in the 72-hour group. At 3 months, the median Montreal Cognitive Assessment score was 26 (interquartile range, 24 to 29) and 27 (interquartile range, 24 to 28), respectively. There was no significant between-group difference in the incidence of adverse events., Conclusions: Active device-based fever prevention for 36 or 72 hours after cardiac arrest did not result in significantly different percentages of patients dying or having severe disability or coma. (Funded by the Novo Nordisk Foundation; BOX ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03141099.)., (Copyright © 2022 Massachusetts Medical Society.)

Aim: The COVID-19 pandemic resulted in a significant decrease in the number of hospital admissions for severe emergent cardiovascular diseases during lockdowns worldwide. This study aimed to determine the impact of both the first and the second Danish nationwide lockdown on the implantation rate of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs)., Methods: We retrospectively analysed the number of CIED implantations performed in Denmark and stratified them into 3-week intervals., Results: The total number of de novo CIED implantations decreased during the first lockdown by 15.5% and during the second by 5.1%. Comparing each 3-week interval using rate ratios, a significant decrease in the daily rates of the total number of de novo and replacement CIEDs (0.82, 95% CI [0.70, 0.96]), de novo CIEDs only (0.82, 95% CI [0.69, 0.98]), and non-acute pacemaker implantations (0.80, 95% CI [0.63, 0.99]) was observed during the first interval of the first lockdown. During the second lockdown (third interval), a significant decrease was seen in the daily rates of de novo CIEDs (0.73, 95% CI [0.55, 0.97]), and of pacemakers in total during both the second (0.78, 95% CI [0.62, 0.97]) and the third (0.60, 95% CI [0.42, 0.85]) intervals. Additionally, the daily rates of acute pacemaker implantation decreased during the second interval (0.47, 95% CI [0.27, 0.79]) and of non-acute implantation during the third interval (0.57, 95% CI [0.38, 0.84]). A significant increase was observed in the number of replacement procedures during the first interval of the second lockdown (1.70, 95% CI [1.04, 2.85])., Conclusions: Our study found only modest changes in CIED implantations in Denmark during two national lockdowns., (Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Aims: Atrial fibrillation (AF) and heart failure (HF) often coexist. However, whether AF onset before HF or vice versa is associated with the worst outcome remains unclear. A consensus of large studies can guide future research and preventive strategies to better target high-risk patients., Methods and Results: We included all Danish cases with the coexistence of AF and HF (2005-17) using nationwide registries. Patients were divided into three separate groups (i) AF before HF, (ii) HF before AF, or (iii) AF and HF diagnosed concurrently (±30 days). Adjusting landmark Cox analyses (index date was the time of the latter diagnosis of AF or HF) were used for evaluating the association of the three groups with a composite outcome of ischaemic stroke or death. Among a total of 49 042 patients included, 40% had AF before HF, 27% had HF before AF, and 33% had AF and HF diagnosed concurrently. The composite endpoint accrued more often in patients with HF before AF compared to the two other groups (<0.001), and this remained significant in the adjusted analyses with hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals) of 1.26 (1.22-1.30) compared to AF before HF. Finally, antihypertensive treatment, oral anticoagulants, amiodarone, statins, and AF ablation were associated with a lower hazard ratio of the composite endpoint (all < 0.001)., Conclusions: In this large Danish national cohort, diagnosis of HF before AF was associated with an increased absolute risk of death compared to AF before HF and AF and HF diagnosed concurrently. Antihypertensive treatment, oral anticoagulants, amiodarone, statins, and AF ablation may improve prognosis., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: P.M.O. acts as an advisor to Prolaio Inc. All remaining authors have declared no conflicts of interest.., (© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.)

Background: Patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) are generally regarded as having increased risk of arrhythmia, stroke, heart failure, and sudden cardiac death, but reported mortality rates vary considerably and originate from selected populations., Study Objective: We aimed to investigate the long-term mortality rate in a nationwide cohort of patients with HCM compared to a matched cohort from the general Danish population., Methods: All patients with a first-time HCM diagnosis in Denmark between January 1, 2007 and December 31, 2018 were identified through nationwide registries. In the main analysis, two visits in an outpatient clinic were required in order to increase specificity. Patients were matched to controls from the background population in a 1:3 ratio based on age, sex, selected comorbidities and date of HCM. Mortalities were compared using Kaplan Meier estimator and multivariable Cox regression models., Results: We identified 3126 patients with a first-time diagnosis of HCM. 1197 patients had at least two visits in the outpatient clinic (43 % female, median age 63.1 [25th-75th percentile 52.1-72.1] years). All-cause mortality was significantly higher in HCM patients than in matched controls: 10-year probabilities of death were 36.4 % (95 % CI 30.2-43.5 %) for HCM patients and 19.4 % (95 % CI 16.8-22.5 %) for controls. After adjusting for additional comorbidities and medications, a diagnosis with HCM was associated with an increased mortality rate (HR 1.48 (95 % CI 1.18-1.84, p  = 0.001))., Conclusion: Compared to matched controls from the background population, presence of HCM was associated with a significant increase in mortality rate., Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (© 2022 The Authors.)

Background and Aims: The causal contribution of apolipoprotein B (apoB) particles to coronary artery disease (CAD) is established. We examined whether this atherogenic contribution is better reflected by non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C) or apoB particle concentration., Method and Results: We performed Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis using 235 variants as genetic instruments; testing the relationship between their effects on the exposures, non-HDL-C and apoB, and on the outcome CAD using weighted regression. Variant effect estimates on the exposures came from the UK Biobank (N = 376 336) and on the outcome from a meta-analysis of five CAD datasets (187 451 cases and 793 315 controls). Subsequently, we carried out sensitivity and replication analyses.In univariate MR analysis, both exposures associated with CAD (βnon-HDL-C = 0.40, P = 2.8 × 10-48 and βapoB = 0.38, P = 1.3 × 10-44). Adding effects on non-HDL-C into a model that already included those on apoB significantly improved the genetically predicted CAD effects (P = 3.9 × 10-5), while adding apoB into the model including non-HDL-C did not (P = 0.69). Thirty-five per cent (82/235) of the variants used as genetic instruments had discordant effects on the exposures, associating with non-HDL-C/apoB ratio at P < 2.1 × 10-4 (0.05/235). Fifty-one variants associated at genome-wide significance., Conclusion: Many sequence variants have discordant effects on non-HDL-C and apoB. These variants allowed us to show that the causal mechanism underlying the relationship between apolipoprotein B particles and CAD is more associated with non-HDL-C than apoB particle concentration., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: The following authors affiliated with deCODE genetics/Amgen, Inc., are employed by the company: A.H., G.Th., A.S., L.S., G.S., V.T., E.B., V.S., S.G., H.H., J.S., P.S., D.O.A., G.T., U.T., D.F.G., K.S, and H.H., (© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.)

Background: COVID-19 can cause cardiopulmonary involvement. Physical activity and cardiac complications can worsen prognosis, while pulmonary complications can reduce performance., Aims: To determine the prevalence and clinical implications of SARS-CoV-2 cardiopulmonary involvement in elite athletes., Methods: An observational study between 1 July 2020 and 30 June 2021 with the assessment of coronary biomarkers, electrocardiogram, echocardiography, Holter-monitoring, spirometry, and chest X-ray in Danish elite athletes showed that PCR-tested positive for SARS-CoV-2. The cohort consisted of male football players screened weekly (cohort I) and elite athletes on an international level only tested if they had symptoms, were near-contact, or participated in international competitions (cohort II). All athletes were categorized into two groups based on symptoms and duration of COVID-19: Group 1 had no cardiopulmonary symptoms and duration ≤7 days, and; Group 2 had cardiopulmonary symptoms or disease duration >7 days., Results: In total 121 athletes who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 were investigated. Cardiac involvement was identified in 2/121 (2%) and pulmonary involvement in 15/121 (12%) participants. In group 1, 87 (72%), no athletes presented with signs of cardiac involvement, and 8 (7%) were diagnosed with radiological COVID-19-related findings or obstructive lung function. In group 2, 34 (28%), two had myocarditis (6%), and 8 (24%) were diagnosed with radiological COVID-19-related findings or obstructive lung function., Conclusions: These clinically-driven data show no signs of cardiac involvement among athletes who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 infection without cardiopulmonary symptoms and duration <7 days. Athletes with cardiopulmonary symptoms or prolonged duration of COVID-19 display, exercise-limiting cardiopulmonary involvement., Competing Interests: None of the authors has any conflict of interest., (© 2022 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.)

Patients with non-ischemic systolic heart failure (HF) have increased risk of sudden cardiovascular death (SCD). The initiation and substrate for ventricular arrhythmias remains poorly understood. Our purpose was to describe the relationship between cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) and Holter recorded ventricular arrhythmic activity. Patients from the DANISH trial underwent a Holter-recording and a CMR-scan. The presence of non-sustained ventricular tachycardia (NSVT) and premature ventricular contractions (PVC) were examined in relation to presence and amount of LGE. Outcome measures were all-cause mortality and SCD. Overall, 180 patients were included. LGE was present in 86 (47%). NSVT occurred in 72 (40%), not different according to LGE status (p = 0.65). The amount of LGE was not correlated to the occurrence of NSVT (p = 0.40). The occurrence of couplet PVCs (p = 0.997), frequent PVCs (p = 0.12), PVCs in bigemini (p = 0.29), in trigemini (p = 0.26), or in quadrimini (p = 0.35) did not differ according to LGE status. LGE was significantly associated with risk of all-cause mortality (HR 2.14; 95% CI 1.05-4.37, p = 0.04). NSVT did not increase risk of all-cause mortality in either patients with LGE (HR 1.00; 95% CI 0.46-2.16, p = 0.996) or without LGE (HR 1.37; 95% CI 0.46-4.08, p = 0.57). There was no interaction between LGE and NSVT for the risk of all-cause mortality (p = 0.62). In patients with non-ischemic systolic HF there was no relationship between the presence of LGE and NSVT or any other Holter recorded ventricular tachyarrhythmia. LGE was associated with increased risk of mortality, independent of the presence of NSVT., (© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V.)

Background: According to patterns of inheritance and incomplete penetrance, fewer than half of relatives to dilated cardiomyopathy probands will develop disease., Objectives: The purpose of this study was to investigate the prevalence and incidence, and to identify predictors of developing familial dilated cardiomyopathy (FDC) in relatives participating in family screening., Methods: The study was a retrospective, longitudinal cohort study of families screened and followed from 2006 to 2020 at a regional assembly of clinics for inherited cardiomyopathies., Results: In total, 211 families (563 relatives, 50% women) were included. At baseline, 124 relatives (22%) were diagnosed with FDC. Genetic sequencing identified the etiology in 37% of screened families and classified 101 (18%) relatives as unaffected carriers (n = 43) or noncarriers (ie, not at risk of FDC [n = 58]). The combined clinical and genetic baseline yield was 30%. During follow-up (2,313 person-years, median 5.0 years), 45 developed FDC (incidence rate of 2.0% per person-year; 95% CI: 1.4%-2.8%), increasing the overall yield to 34%. The incidence rate of FDC was high in relatives with baseline abnormalities on electrocardiogram or echocardiography compared with relatives with normal findings (4.7% vs 0.4% per person-year; HR: 12.9; P < 0.001). In total, baseline screening identified 326 (58%) relatives to be at low risk of FDC., Conclusions: Family screening identified a genetic predisposition to or overt FDC in 1 of 3 relatives at baseline. Genetic and clinical screening was normal in more than half of relatives, and these relatives had a low risk of developing FDC during follow-up. Thus, baseline screening identified a large proportion, in whom follow-up may safely be reduced, allowing focused follow-up of relatives at risk., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures The AP Møller Foundation (Dr Bundgaard), The Research Foundations at Rigshospitalet (Drs Vissing and Bundgaard), The Capital Region of Denmark (Dr Bundgaard), The Independent Research Fund Denmark (0134-00363B, Dr Christensen), The Novo Nordisk Foundation Denmark (NNF20OC0065799, Dr Christensen), the Innovation Fund Denmark (Dr Bundgaard), and NordForsk (through the funding to PM Heart [90580, Dr Bundgaard]) supported this study. The authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2022 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The appropriate oxygenation target for mechanical ventilation in comatose survivors of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest is unknown., Methods: In this randomized trial with a 2-by-2 factorial design, we randomly assigned comatose adults with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in a 1:1 ratio to either a restrictive oxygen target of a partial pressure of arterial oxygen (Pao 2 ) of 9 to 10 kPa (68 to 75 mm Hg) or a liberal oxygen target of a Pao 2 of 13 to 14 kPa (98 to 105 mm Hg); patients were also assigned to one of two blood-pressure targets (reported separately). The primary outcome was a composite of death from any cause or hospital discharge with severe disability or coma (Cerebral Performance Category [CPC] of 3 or 4; categories range from 1 to 5, with higher values indicating more severe disability), whichever occurred first within 90 days after randomization. Secondary outcomes were neuron-specific enolase levels at 48 hours, death from any cause, the score on the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (ranging from 0 to 30, with higher scores indicating better cognitive ability), the score on the modified Rankin scale (ranging from 0 to 6, with higher scores indicating greater disability), and the CPC at 90 days., Results: A total of 789 patients underwent randomization. A primary-outcome event occurred in 126 of 394 patients (32.0%) in the restrictive-target group and in 134 of 395 patients (33.9%) in the liberal-target group (hazard ratio, 0.95; 95% confidence interval, 0.75 to 1.21; P = 0.69). At 90 days, death had occurred in 113 patients (28.7%) in the restrictive-target group and in 123 (31.1%) in the liberal-target group. On the CPC, the median category was 1 in the two groups; on the modified Rankin scale, the median score was 2 in the restrictive-target group and 1 in the liberal-target group; and on the Montreal Cognitive Assessment, the median score was 27 in the two groups. At 48 hours, the median neuron-specific enolase level was 17 μg per liter in the restrictive-target group and 18 μg per liter in the liberal-target group. The incidence of adverse events was similar in the two groups., Conclusions: Targeting of a restrictive or liberal oxygenation strategy in comatose patients after resuscitation for cardiac arrest resulted in a similar incidence of death or severe disability or coma. (Funded by the Novo Nordisk Foundation; BOX ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03141099.)., (Copyright © 2022 Massachusetts Medical Society.)

Background: Evidence to support the choice of blood-pressure targets for the treatment of comatose survivors of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest who are receiving intensive care is limited., Methods: In a double-blind, randomized trial with a 2-by-2 factorial design, we evaluated a mean arterial blood-pressure target of 63 mm Hg as compared with 77 mm Hg in comatose adults who had been resuscitated after an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest of presumed cardiac cause; patients were also assigned to one of two oxygen targets (reported separately). The primary outcome was a composite of death from any cause or hospital discharge with a Cerebral Performance Category (CPC) of 3 or 4 within 90 days (range, 0 to 5, with higher categories indicating more severe disability; a category of 3 or 4 indicates severe disability or coma). Secondary outcomes included neuron-specific enolase levels at 48 hours, death from any cause, scores on the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (range, 0 to 30, with higher scores indicating better cognitive ability) and the modified Rankin scale (range, 0 to 6, with higher scores indicating greater disability) at 3 months, and the CPC at 3 months., Results: A total of 789 patients were included in the analysis (393 in the high-target group and 396 in the low-target group). A primary-outcome event occurred in 133 patients (34%) in the high-target group and in 127 patients (32%) in the low-target group (hazard ratio, 1.08; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.84 to 1.37; P = 0.56). At 90 days, 122 patients (31%) in the high-target group and 114 patients (29%) in the low-target group had died (hazard ratio, 1.13; 95% CI, 0.88 to 1.46). The median CPC was 1 (interquartile range, 1 to 5) in both the high-target group and the low-target group; the corresponding median modified Rankin scale scores were 1 (interquartile range, 0 to 6) and 1 (interquartile range, 0 to 6), and the corresponding median Montreal Cognitive Assessment scores were 27 (interquartile range, 24 to 29) and 26 (interquartile range, 24 to 29). The median neuron-specific enolase level at 48 hours was also similar in the two groups. The percentages of patients with adverse events did not differ significantly between the groups., Conclusions: Targeting a mean arterial blood pressure of 77 mm Hg or 63 mm Hg in patients who had been resuscitated from cardiac arrest did not result in significantly different percentages of patients dying or having severe disability or coma. (Funded by the Novo Nordisk Foundation; BOX ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03141099.)., (Copyright © 2022 Massachusetts Medical Society.)

Background: Men and women may respond differently to certain therapies for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, including implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICD). In an extended follow-up study of the DANISH trial (Danish Study to Assess the Efficacy of ICDs in Patients With Non-Ischemic Systolic Heart Failure on Mortality), adding 4 years of additional follow-up, we examined the effect of ICD implantation according to sex., Methods: In the DANISH trial, 1116 patients with nonischemic systolic heart failure were randomized to receive an ICD (N=556) or usual clinical care (N=550). The primary outcome was all-cause mortality., Results: Of the 1116 patients randomized in the DANISH trial, 307 (27.5%) were women. During a median follow-up of 9.5 years, women had a lower associated rate of all-cause mortality (hazard ratio [HR], 0.60 [95% CI, 0.47-0.78]) cardiovascular death (HR, 0.62 [95% CI, 0.46-0.84]), nonsudden cardiovascular death (HR, 0.59 [95% CI, 0.42-0.85]), and a numerically lower rate of sudden cardiovascular death (HR, 0.70 [95% CI, 0.40-1.25]), compared with men. Compared with usual clinical care, ICD implantation did not reduce the rate of all-cause mortality, irrespective of sex (men, HR, 0.85 [95% CI, 0.69-1.06]; women, HR, 0.98 [95% CI, 0.64-1.50]; P interaction=0.51). In addition, sex did not modify the effect of ICD implantation on sudden cardiovascular death (men, HR, 0.57 [95% CI, 0.36-0.92]; women, HR, 0.68 [95% CI, 0.26-1.77]; P interaction=0.76)., Conclusions: In patients with nonischemic systolic heart failure, ICD implantation did not provide an overall survival benefit, but reduced sudden cardiovascular death, irrespective of sex., Registration: URL: https://www., Clinicaltrials: gov; Unique identifier: NCT00542945.

Aims: Prophylactic implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICD) reduce mortality in patients with ischaemic heart failure (HF), whereas the effect of ICD in patients with non-ischaemic HF is less clear. We aimed to investigate the association between concomitant coronary atherosclerosis and mortality in patients with non-ischaemic HF and the effect of ICD implantation in these patients., Methods and Results: Patients were included from DANISH (Danish Study to Assess the Efficacy of Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators in Patients with Non-Ischaemic Systolic Heart Failure on Mortality), randomizing patients to ICD or control. Study inclusion criteria for HF were left ventricular ejection fraction ≤ 35% and increased levels (>200 pg/mL) of N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide. Of the 1116 patients from DANISH, 838 (75%) patients had available data from coronary angiogram and were included in this subgroup analysis. We used Cox regression to assess the relationship between coronary atherosclerosis and mortality and the effect of ICD implantation. Of the included patients, 266 (32%) had coronary atherosclerosis. Of these, 216 (81%) had atherosclerosis without significant stenoses, and 50 (19%) had significant stenosis. Patients with atherosclerosis were significantly older {67 [interquartile range (IQR) 61-73] vs. 61 [IQR 54-68] years; P < 0.0001}, and more were men (77% vs. 70%; P = 0.03). During a median follow-up of 64.3 months (IQR 47-82), 174 (21%) of the patients died. The effect of ICD on all-cause mortality was not modified by coronary atherosclerosis [hazard ratio (HR) 0.94; 0.58-1.52; P = 0.79 vs. HR 0.82; 0.56-1.20; P = 0.30], P for interaction = 0.67. In univariable analysis, coronary atherosclerosis was a significant predictor of all-cause mortality [HR, 1.41; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.04-1.91; P = 0.03]. However, this association disappeared when adjusting for cardiovascular risk factors (age, gender, diabetes, hypertension, smoking, and estimated glomerular filtration rate) (HR 1.05, 0.76-1.45, P = 0.76)., Conclusions: In patients with non-ischaemic systolic heart failure, ICD implantation did not reduce all-cause mortality in patients either with or without concomitant coronary atherosclerosis. The concomitant presence of coronary atherosclerosis was associated with increased mortality. However, this association was explained by other risk factors., (© 2022 The Authors. ESC Heart Failure published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Society of Cardiology.)

Background: Identification of patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy who may benefit from prophylactic implantation of a cardioverter-defibrillator. We hypothesized that periodic repolarization dynamics (PRD), a marker of repolarization instability associated with sympathetic activity, could be used to identify patients who will benefit from prophylactic implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) implantation., Methods: We performed a post hoc analysis of DANISH (Danish ICD Study in Patients With Dilated Cardiomyopathy), in which patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤35%, and elevated NT-proBNP (N-terminal probrain natriuretic peptides) were randomized to ICD implantation or control group. Patients were included in the PRD substudy if they had a 24-hour Holter monitor recording at baseline with technically acceptable ECG signals during the night hours (00:00-06:00). PRD was assessed using wavelet analysis according to previously validated methods. The primary end point was all-cause mortality. Cox regression models were adjusted for age, sex, NT-proBNP, estimated glomerular filtration rate, LVEF, atrial fibrillation, ventricular pacing, diabetes, cardiac resynchronization therapy, and mean heart rate. We proposed PRD ≥10 deg 2 as an exploratory cut-off value for ICD implantation., Results: A total of 748 of the 1116 patients in DANISH qualified for the PRD substudy. During a mean follow-up period of 5.1±2.0 years, 82 of 385 patients died in the ICD group and 85 of 363 patients died in the control group ( P =0.40). In Cox regression analysis, PRD was independently associated with mortality (hazard ratio [HR], 1.28 [95% CI, 1.09-1.50] per SD increase; P =0.003). PRD was significantly associated with mortality in the control group (HR, 1.51 [95% CI, 1.25-1.81]; P <0.001) but not in the ICD group (HR, 1.04 [95% CI, 0.83-1.54]; P =0.71). There was a significant interaction between PRD and the effect of ICD implantation on mortality ( P =0.008), with patients with higher PRD having greater benefit in terms of mortality reduction. ICD implantation was associated with an absolute mortality reduction of 17.5% in the 280 patients with PRD ≥10 deg 2 (HR, 0.54 [95% CI, 0.34-0.84]; P =0.006; number needed to treat=6), but not in the 468 patients with PRD <10 deg 2 (HR, 1.17 [95% CI, 0.77-1.78]; P =0.46; P for interaction=0.01)., Conclusions: Increased PRD identified patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy in whom prophylactic ICD implantation led to significant mortality reduction.

Objectives: In this extended follow-up study of the DANISH (Danish Study to Assess the Efficacy of Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators in Patients with Non-ischemic Systolic Heart Failure on Mortality) trial, adding 4 years of additional follow-up, we examined the effect of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) implantation according to baseline N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) level., Background: In the DANISH trial, NT-proBNP level at baseline appeared to modify the response to ICD implantation., Methods: In the DANISH trial, 1,116 patients with nonischemic systolic HF were randomized to receive an ICD (N = 556) or usual clinical care (N = 550). Outcomes were analyzed according to NT-proBNP levels (below/above median) at baseline. The primary outcome was death from any cause., Results: All 1,116 patients in the DANISH trial had an available NT-proBNP measurement at baseline (median: 1,177 pg/mL; range: 200-22,918 pg/mL). There was a trend toward a reduction in all-cause death with ICD implantation, compared with usual clinical care, in patients with NT-proBNP levels lower than the median (HR: 0.75 [95% CI: 0.55-1.03]), but not in those with higher NT-proBNP levels (HR: 0.95 [95% CI: 0.74-1.21]) (P interaction  = 0.28). Similarly, ICD implantation significantly reduced the rate of cardiovascular (CV) and sudden cardiovascular death (SCD) in patients with NT-proBNP levels lower than the median (CV death, HR: 0.69 [95% CI: 0.47-1.00]; SCD, HR: 0.37 [95% CI: 0.19-0.75]), but not in those with higher levels (CV death, HR: 0.94 [95% CI: 0.70-1.25]; SCD, HR: 0.86 [95% CI: 0.49-1.51]) (P interaction  = 0.20 and 0.08 for CV death and SCD, respectively)., Conclusions: Lower baseline NT-proBNP levels could identify patients with nonischemic systolic HF who may derive benefit from ICD implantation. (Danish Study to Assess the Efficacy of Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators in Patients with Non-ischemic Systolic Heart Failure on Mortality [DANISH]; NCT00542945)., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures Dr Butt has received advisory board honoraria from Bayer, outside the submitted work. Dr Nielsen is supported by a grant from the Novo Nordisk Foundation (NNF16OC0018658) outside this work. Dr Bruun has received funding from the Novo Nordisk Foundation, the Augustinus Foundation, the Kaj Hansen Foundation, and from Health Insurance Denmark outside this work. Dr Brandes has received a research grant from Theravance and the Regions of Southern Denmark and Zealand; has received speaker honoraria from Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, and Bristol-Myers Squibb; and has received a travel grant from Biotronik outside this work. Dr Gustafsson has received speaker honorarium from Orion, Novartis, and Vifor Pharma; and has received advisory board honorarium from Abott, Bayer, Alnylam, Ionis, Pfizer, Corvia, and Pharmacosmos. Dr Hassager has received speaker honorarium from Abiomed. Dr Svendsen has received speaker honorarium from Medtronic. Dr Pehrson has received lecture fees from Abbott, Bristol Myers Squibb, and AstraZeneca. Dr Køber has received speaker honorarium from Novartis, AstraZeneca, Boehringer, and Novo Nordisk. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2022 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: DANISH (The Danish Study to Assess the Efficacy of Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators [ICDs] in Patients With Nonischemic Systolic Heart Failure on Mortality) found that primary-prevention ICD implantation was not associated with an overall survival benefit in patients with nonischemic systolic heart failure during a median follow-up of 5.6 years, although there was a beneficial effect on all-cause mortality in patients ≤70 years. This study presents an additional 4 years of follow-up data from DANISH., Methods: In DANISH, 556 patients with nonischemic systolic heart failure were randomized to receive an ICD and 560 to receive usual clinical care and followed until June 30, 2016. In this long-term follow-up study, patients were followed until May 18, 2020. Analyses were conducted for the overall population and according to age (≤70 and >70 years)., Results: During a median follow-up of 9.5 years (25th-75th percentile, 7.9-10.9 years), 208/556 patients (37%) in the ICD group and 226/560 patients (40%) in the control group died. Compared with the control group, the ICD group did not have significantly lower all-cause mortality (hazard ratio [HR] 0.89, [95% CI, 0.74-1.08]; P = 0.24). In patients ≤70 years (n = 829), all-cause mortality was lower in the ICD group than the control group (117/389 [30%] versus 158/440 [36%]; HR, 0.78 [95% CI, 0.61-0.99]; P = 0.04), whereas in patients >70 years (n = 287), all-cause mortality was not significantly different between the ICD and control group (91/167 [54%] versus 68/120 [57%]; HR, 0.92 [95% CI, 0.67-1.28]; P = 0.75). Cardiovascular death showed similar trends (overall, 147/556 [26%] versus 164/560 [29%]; HR, 0.87 [95% CI, 0.70-1.09]; P = 0.20; ≤70 years, 87/389 [22%] versus 122/440 [28%]; HR, 0.75 [95% CI, 0.57-0.98]; P = 0.04; >70 years, 60/167 [36%] versus 42/120 [35%]; HR, 0.97 [95% CI, 0.65-1.45]; P = 0.91). The ICD group had a significantly lower incidence of sudden cardiovascular death in the overall population (35/556 [6%] versus 57/560 [10%]; HR, 0.60 [95% CI, 0.40-0.92]; P = 0.02) and in patients ≤70 years (19/389 [5%] versus 49/440 [11%]; HR, 0.42 [95% CI, 0.24-0.71]; P = 0.0008), but not in patients >70 years (16/167 [10%] versus 8/120 [7%]; HR, 1.34 [95% CI, 0.56-3.19]; P = 0.39)., Conclusions: During a median follow-up of 9.5 years, ICD implantation did not provide an overall survival benefit in patients with nonischemic systolic heart failure. In patients ≤70 years, ICD implantation was associated with a lower incidence of all-cause mortality, cardiovascular death, and sudden cardiovascular death. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT00542945.

Aims: Improved risk stratification to identify non-ischaemic heart failure patients who will benefit from primary prophylactic implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) is needed. We examined the potential of ventricular arrhythmia to identify patients who could benefit from an ICD., Methods and Results: A total of 850 non-ischaemic systolic heart failure patients with left ventricle ≤35% and elevated N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptides had a 24-h Holter monitor recording performed. We examined present non-sustained ventricular tachycardia (NSVT), defined as ≥3 consecutive premature ventricular contractions (PVCs) with a rate of ≥100/min, and number of PVCs per hour stratified into low (<30) and high burden (≥30) groups. Outcome measures were overall mortality, sudden cardiac death (SCD), and cardiovascular death (CVD). In total, 193 patients died, 49 from SCD and 125 from CVD. Non-sustained ventricular tachycardia (365 patients) was significantly associated with increased all-cause mortality [hazard ratio (HR) 1.47; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.07-2.03; P = 0.02] and to CVD (HR 1.89; CI 1.25-2.87; P = 0.003). High burden PVC (352 patients) was associated with increased all-cause mortality (HR1.38; CI 1.00-1.90; P = 0.046) and with CVD (HR 1.78; CI 1.19-2.66; P = 0.005). There was no statistically significant association with SCD for neither NSVT nor PVC. In interaction analyses, neither NSVT (P = 0.56) nor high burden of PVC (P = 0.97) was associated with survival benefit from ICD implantation., Conclusion: Ventricular arrhythmia in non-ischaemic heart failure patients was associated with a worse prognosis but could not be used to stratify patients to ICD implantation., (Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. © The Author(s) 2020. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Background: Atrial fibrillation (AF) in heart failure (HF) patients has been associated with a worse outcome. Similarly, excessive supraventricular ectopic activity (ESVEA) has been linked to development of AF, stroke, and death. This study aimed to investigate AF and ESVEA's association with outcomes and effect of prophylactic implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) implantation in nonischemic HF patients., Methods: A total of 850 patients with nonischemic HF, left ventricle ejection fraction ≤35%, and elevated N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptides underwent 24 hours Holter recording. The presence of AF (≥30 seconds) and ESVEA (≥30 supraventricular ectopic complexes (SVEC) per hour or run of SVEC ≥20 beats) were registered. Outcomes were all-cause mortality, cardiovascular death (CVD), and sudden cardiac death (SCD)., Results: AF was identified in 188 patients (22%) and ESVEA in 84 patients (10%). After 4 years and 11 months of follow-up, a total of 193 patients (23%) had died. AF was associated with all-cause mortality (hazard ratio [HR] 1.44; confidence interval [CI] 1.04-1.99; P = .03) and CVD (HR 1.59; CI 1.07-2.36; P = .02). ESVEA was associated with all-cause mortality (HR 1.73; CI 1.16-2.57; P = .0073) and CVD (HR 1.76; CI 1.06-2.92; P = .03). Neither AF nor ESVEA was associated with SCD. ICD implantation was not associated with an improved prognosis for neither AF (P value for interaction = .17), nor ESVEA (P value for interaction = .68)., Conclusions: Both AF and ESVEA were associated with worsened prognosis in nonischemic HF. However, ICD implantation was not associated with an improved prognosis for either group., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to evaluate in-hospital outcomes among patients with a history of heart failure (HF) hospitalized with coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19)., Background: Cardiometabolic comorbidities are common in patients with severe COVID-19. Patients with HF may be particularly susceptible to COVID-19 complications., Methods: The Premier Healthcare Database was used to identify patients with at least 1 HF hospitalization or 2 HF outpatient visits between January 1, 2019, and March 31, 2020, who were subsequently hospitalized between April and September 2020. Baseline characteristics, health care resource utilization, and mortality rates were compared between those hospitalized with COVID-19 and those hospitalized with other causes. Predictors of in-hospital mortality were identified in HF patients hospitalized with COVID-19 by using multivariate logistic regression., Results: Among 1,212,153 patients with history of HF, 132,312 patients were hospitalized from April 1, 2020, to September 30, 2020. A total of 23,843 patients (18.0%) were hospitalized with acute HF, 8,383 patients (6.4%) were hospitalized with COVID-19, and 100,068 patients (75.6%) were hospitalized with alternative reasons. Hospitalization with COVID-19 was associated with greater odds of in-hospital mortality as compared with hospitalization with acute HF; 24.2% of patients hospitalized with COVID-19 died in-hospital compared to 2.6% of those hospitalized with acute HF. This association was strongest in April (adjusted odds ratio [OR]: 14.48; 95% confidence interval [CI]:12.25 to 17.12) than in subsequent months (adjusted OR: 10.11; 95% CI: 8.95 to 11.42; p interaction  <0.001). Among patients with HF hospitalized with COVID-19, male sex (adjusted OR: 1.26; 95% CI: 1.13 to 1.40) and morbid obesity (adjusted OR: 1.25; 95% CI: 1.07 to 1.46) were associated with greater odds of in-hospital mortality, along with age (adjusted OR: 1.35; 95% CI: 1.29 to 1.42 per 10 years) and admission earlier in the pandemic., Conclusions: Patients with HF hospitalized with COVID-19 are at high risk for complications, with nearly 1 in 4 dying during hospitalization., Competing Interests: Author Disclosures Dr. Bhatt has received speaker fees from Sanofi Pasteur; and is supported by National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute T32 post-doctoral training grant T32HL007604. Dr. Jering is supported by National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute T32 post-doctoral training grant T32HL007604. Dr. Vaduganathan has received grants from Harvard Catalyst, grants and personal fees from Amgen, and personal fees from AstraZeneca, Baxter HealthCare, Bayer AG, Boehringer Ingelheim, Cytokinetics, and Relypsa outside the submitted work. Dr. Claggett has received personal fees from Amgen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Corvia, MyoKardia, and Novartis outside the submitted work. Dr. Cunningham is supported by National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute T32 post-doctoral training grant T32HL007604. Dr. Rosenthal is an employee of Premier Inc., which curates the Premier Healthcare Database. Dr. Signorovitch is an employee of Analysis Group, Inc. Dr. Thune has received lecture fees from Bristol-Myers Squibb; and has received personal fees and travel support from Novartis. Dr. Vardeny has received research support from U.S. National Institutes of Health; and is a consultant for Sanofi-Pasteur. Dr. Solomon has received grants from Alnylam, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bellerophon, Bayer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celladon, Cytokinetics, Eidos, Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, Ionis, Lone Star Heart, Mesoblast, MyoKardia, Neurotronik, National Institutes of Health/National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, Novartis, Respicardia, Sanofi Pasteur, and Theracos; and has received personal fees from Akros, Alnylam, Amgen, Arena, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Bristol-Meyers Squibb, Cardior, Cardurion, Corvia, Cytokinetics, Daiichi-Sankyo, Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, Ironwood, Merck, Myokardia, Novartis, Roche, Takeda, Theracos, Quantum Genetics, Cardurion, AoBiome, Janssen, Cardiac Dimensions, Sanofi-Pasteur, Tenaya, Dinaqor, Tremeau, CellProThera, and Moderna outside the submitted work., (Copyright © 2021 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Doxorubicin is a cornerstone in lymphoma treatment, but is limited by dose-dependent cardiotoxicity. Rubidium-82 positron emission tomography ( 82 Rb PET) assesses coronary microvascular function through absolute quantification of myocardial perfusion and myocardial perfusion reserve (MPR). Doxorubicin-induced microvascular injury represents a potential early marker of cardiotoxicity., Methods and Results: We included 70 lymphoma patients scheduled for doxorubicin-based treatment. Cardiotoxicity was evaluated with 82 Rb PET myocardial perfusion imaging during rest and adenosine stress before chemotherapy and shortly after the first doxorubicin exposure. Patients with a MPR decline > 20% were defined as having a low threshold for cardiotoxicity. In the 54 patients with complete data sets, MPR was significantly lower after the initial doxorubicin exposure (2.69 vs 2.51, P = .03). We registered a non-significant decline in stress perfusion (3.18 vs 3.02 ml/g/min, P = .08), but no change in resting myocardial perfusion. There were 13 patients with a low cardiotoxic threshold. These patients had a significantly higher age, but were otherwise similar to the remaining part of the study population., Conclusion: Decreases in MPR after initial doxorubicin exposure in lymphoma patients may represent an early marker of doxorubicin-induced cardiotoxicity. The prognostic value of acute doxorubicin-induced changes in MPR remains to be investigated.

Objective: To examine the gradual association between self-reported health status and mortality in patients with heart failure (HF) as current research has focused on poor health status and increased risk of mortality., Method: This is a substudy of the DANISH (Defibrillator Implantation in Patients with Nonischemic Systolic HF) trial in which 1116 patients were randomized to receive or not receive an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator. Health status was assessed by a single question of the Short-Form 36. Patients were classified as having excellent/very good, good, fair (reference) or poor health status. We assessed the association between health status and mortality using multivariable Cox proportional hazard models., Results: Self-reported health status was completed by 943 (84%) patients at randomization with a median follow-up of 67 months and a health status distribution of; excellent/very good (n = 79, 8%), good (n = 369, 39%), fair (n = 409, 43%), and poor (n = 86, 9%). All-cause mortality (death events/ 100 person-years) occurred with gradual differences according to health status from excellent/ very good (2.14), good (3.74), fair (5.21) to poor health status (5.57). The gradual difference yielded a crude hazard ratio (HR) of 0.40, 95% CI 0.20-0.80 (adjusted HR 0.47 (95% CI 0.23-0.95) for excellent/ very good health status, HR 0.71, 95% CI 0.52-0.97 (adjusted HR 0.78 (95% CI 0.56-1.08) for good health status. Poor being worse than fair health status yielded a crude HR of 1.07, 95% CI 0.67-1.69., Conclusion: Excellent/very good self-reported health status as assessed by a single question was associated with lower long-term mortality in patients with HF., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest CTP reports study grants from Bayer and Novo Nordisk not related to this work. JJT reports speaker fees from Novartis and AstraZeneca not related to this work. JCN reports study grant from Novo Nordisk Foundation (NNF16OC0018658) not related to this work. All other authors declare none., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Doxorubicin is the mainstay of curative lymphoma treatment but is associated with a dose-dependent cardiotoxicity that is often recognized too late to avoid substantial irreversible cardiac injury. Iodine-123 metaiodobenzylguanidine ( 123 I-MIBG) is a gamma-emitting tracer that mimics noradrenaline uptake, storage, and release mechanisms in adrenergic presynaptic neurons. 123 I-MIBG scintigraphy can be used for assessment of doxorubicin-induced injury to myocardial adrenergic neurons during treatment and could be the tool for early detection of doxorubicin cardiotoxicity, which is currently lacking., Methods and Results: A total of 37 lymphoma patients scheduled for doxorubicin treatment were included in our study. 123 I-MIBG imaging was performed prior to chemotherapy and after a median of 4 cycles of doxorubicin. Early and late heart-to-mediastinum ratios (H/M early and H/M late ) and washout rate (WOR) were used for evaluation of cardiotoxicity. The prognostic value of 123 I-MIBG results was assessed using left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) as measured by cardiac magnetic resonance at 1-year follow-up. We found a post-therapy increase in WOR (including nine patients with > 10% increase), which was not statistically significant (18.6 vs 23.4%, P = 0.09). The difference appeared to be driven by an increase in H/M early . LVEF decreased from baseline to 1-year follow-up (64 vs 58%, P = 0.03). LVEF change was not associated with changes in WOR (P = 0.5)., Conclusion: The present study does not provide evidence for 123 I-MIBG imaging as a clinically applicable tool for early detection of doxorubicin-induced cardiotoxicity.

Objectives: To examine the association between health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and mortality in patients with heart failure (HF)., Background: The potential association of HRQoL and mortality in patients with HF is unclear. We investigated this association in The Danish Study to Assess the Efficacy of Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators (ICD) in Patients with Non-ischemic Systolic Heart Failure on Mortality (DANISH)., Methods: In DANISH, a total of 1116 patients with non-ischemic systolic HF on guideline-recommended therapy were randomized to ICD therapy or usual clinical care. HRQoL was assessed at randomization using the disease-specific Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLHFQ, 0-105, high score indicating worse HRQoL). Multivariable Cox proportional hazard models were used to compare hazard ratios (HR) for all-cause mortality according to MLHFQ above or below 45, as recommended by a recent meta-analysis, to identify patients with poor HRQoL., Results: HRQoL was completed by 935 (84%) patients at baseline with a median follow-up of 67 months (IQR 47-83). Patients with poor HRQoL (MLHFQ score > 45, median 60 (IQR 53-71),n = 350) had a higher incidence of all-cause mortality than patients with moderate/good HRQoL (MLHFQ ≤45, median 23 (IQR 13-33), n = 585), respectively 26% vs. 18% with an unadjusted HR of 1.57 (95% CI 1.19-2.08, p = .002), and an adjusted HR of 1.39 (95% CI 1.01-1.91, p = .04)., Conclusion: Poor HRQoL was associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality after adjustment for traditional risk factors., Clinical Trial Registration: https: //clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00542945(DANISH)., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest Dr. Køber reports receiving lecture fees from Novartis. Dr. Thune reports receiving lecture fees from Novartis. Dr. Nielsen reports receiving support from the Novo Nordisk Foundation (NNF16OC0018658 and NNF17OC0029148)., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Aims: Patients with non-ischemic systolic heart failure have an increased risk of sudden cardiac death (SCD). Myocardial fibrosis, detected as late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) with cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR), has been shown to predict all-cause mortality. We hypothesized that LGE can identify patients with non-ischemic heart failure who will benefit from ICD implantation., Methods and Results: In this prospective observational sub-study of the Danish Study to Assess the Efficacy of ICDs in Patients with Nonischemic Systolic Heart Failure on Mortality (DANISH), 252 patients underwent CMR. LGE was quantified by the full width/half maximum method. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality. LGE could be adequately assessed in 236 patients, median age was 61 years and median duration of heart failure was 14 months; there were 108 patients (46%) randomized to ICD. Median follow-up time was 5.3 years. Median left ventricular ejection fraction on CMR was 35%. In all, 50 patients died. LGE was present in 113 patients (48%). The presence of LGE was an independent predictor of all-cause mortality (HR 1.82; 95% CI 1.002-3.29; P = .049) after adjusting for known cardiovascular risk factors. ICD implantation did not impact all-cause mortality, for either patients with LGE (HR 1.18; 95% CI 0.59-2.38; P = .63), or for patients without LGE (HR 1.00; 95% CI 0.39-2.53; P = .99), (P for interaction =0.79)., Conclusion: In patients with non-ischemic systolic heart failure, LGE predicted all-cause mortality. However, in this cohort, LGE did not identify a group of patients who survived longer by receiving an ICD., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: The "distressed" (Type D) personality trait has been reported to be over-represented in patients with heart failure (HF) compared to the background population and may provide prognostic information for mortality. We examined the association between Type D personality and outcomes in the DANISH trial (The Danish Study to Assess the Efficacy of Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators in Patients with Non-ischemic Systolic Heart Failure on Mortality)., Methods: The DANISH trial included a total of 1116 patients with non-ischemic HF on guideline-recommended therapy. Type D personality was assessed with the Type D Scale (DS14) at baseline and investigated through follow-up accordingly. Multivariable Cox proportional hazard models were used to compare hazard ratios (HR) of cardiovascular and all-cause mortality., Results: Type D personality assessment was completed by 873 (78%) patients at baseline and Type D personality was found in 120 (14%) patients. The median follow-up was 67 months (interquartile range [IQR] 48-83). Among patients with versus without Type D personality, 22% versus 19% died from all-cause yielding similar incidence rates of 4.62 (95% CI 3.14-6.87) versus 3.95 (95% CI 3.37-4.66) per 100 person-years. The adjusted risk of all-cause mortality was not significantly different in patients with versus without Type D personality with an adjusted HR of 1.31 (95% CI 0.84-2.03, p = 0.23) with similar results for cardiovascular death (HR 1.46 (95% CI 0.88-2.44, p = 0.15)., Conclusion: Type D personality was not significantly associated with increased risk of all-cause mortality or cardiovascular death in patients with non-ischemic HF.

Background: Patients with nonischemic systolic heart failure (HF) have increased risk of sudden cardiac death (SCD) and death from progressive pump failure. Whether the risk of SCD changes over time is unknown. We seek here to investigate the relation between duration of HF, mode of death, and effect of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator implantation., Methods and Results: We examined the risk of all-cause death and SCD according to the duration of HF among patients with nonischemic systolic HF enrolled in the DANISH (Danish Study to Assess the Efficacy of ICDs in Patients with Non-ischemic Systolic Heart Failure on Mortality). In all, 1116 patients were included. Patients were divided according to quartiles of HF duration (≤8, 9≤18, 19≤65, and ≥66 months). Patients with the longest duration of HF were older, more often men, had more comorbidity, and more often received a cardiac resynchronization therapy device. Doubling of HF duration was an independent predictor of both all-cause mortality (hazard ratio [HR], 1.27; 95% CI, 1.17-1.38; P<0.0001), and SCD (HR, 1.29; 95% CI, 1.11-1.50; P=0.0007). The proportion of deaths caused by SCD was not different between HF quartiles (P=0.91), and the effect of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator implantation on all-cause mortality was not modified by the duration of HF (P=0.59)., Conclusions: Duration of HF predicted both all-cause mortality and risk of SCD independently of other risk indicators. However, the proportion of death caused by SCD did not change with longer duration of HF, and the effect of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator was not modified by the duration of HF., Clinical Trial Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00542945.

Objectives: This study aims to identify patients with nonischemic heart failure who are more likely to benefit from implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) implantation by use of established risk prediction models., Background: It has been debated whether an ICD for primary prevention reduces mortality in patients with nonischemic heart failure., Methods: The Seattle Heart Failure Model (SHFM) predicts all-cause mortality whereas the Seattle Proportional Risk Model (SPRM) predicts the proportion of sudden cardiac death (SCD) versus nonsudden death, with a higher score indicating a greater proportion of SCD. We report the effect of ICD implantation on all-cause mortality and SCD, according to median SPRM and SHFM scores in all 1,116 patients enrolled in the DANISH (Danish study to Assess the Efficacy of ICDs in Patients with Non-ischemic Systolic Heart Failure on mortality) trial., Results: Among patients with an SPRM score above the median (n = 558), ICD implantation reduced all-cause mortality (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.63; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.43 to 0.94), whereas patients with lower SPRM scores (n = 558) had no effect (HR: 1.08; 95% CI: 0.78 to 1.49, p for interaction = 0.04). The corresponding numbers for SHFM score above and below the median were HR: 0.84; 95% CI: 0.62 to 1.13 and HR: 0.82; 95% CI: 0.53 to 1.28, respectively (p for interaction = 0.980). In 177 patients with upper SPRM/upper SHFM, ICD implantation reduced all-cause mortality (HR: 0.45; 95% CI: 0.25 to 0.80) when compared to 381 patients with lower SPRM/upper SHFM (HR: 1.09; 95% CI: 0.76 to 1.55) (p for interaction <0.001)., Conclusions: Nonischemic heart failure patients with high predicted relative likelihood of SCD, as estimated by higher SPRM score, seemed to benefit from ICD implantation. (DANISH [Danish ICD Study in Patients With Ditaled Cardiomyopathy]; NCT00542945)., (Copyright © 2019 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Aims: Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) implantation reduce the risk of sudden cardiac death, but not all-cause death in patients with non-ischaemic systolic heart failure (HF). Whether co-existence of diabetes affects ICD treatment effects is unclear., Methods and Results: We examined the effect of ICD implantation on risk of all-cause death, cardiovascular death, and sudden cardiac death (SCD) according to diabetes status at baseline in the Danish Study to Assess the Efficacy of ICDs in Patients with Non-ischaemic Systolic Heart Failure on Mortality (DANISH) trial. Outcomes were analysed by use of cumulative incidence curves and Cox regressions models. Of the 1116 patients enrolled, 211 (19%) had diabetes at baseline. Patients with diabetes were more obese, had worse kidney function and more were in New York Heart Association Class III/IV. The risk of device infections and other complications in the ICD group was similar among patients with and without diabetes (6.1% vs. 4.6% P = 0.54). Irrespective of treatment group, diabetes was associated with higher risk of all-cause death, cardiovascular death, and SCD. The treatment effect of ICD in patients with diabetes vs. patients without diabetes was hazard ratio (HR) = 0.92 (0.57-1.50) vs. HR = 0.85 (0.63-1.13); Pinteraction = 0.60 for all-cause mortality, HR = 0.99 (0.58-1.70) vs. HR = 0.70 (0.48-1.01); Pinteraction = 0.25 for cardiovascular death, and HR = 0.81 (0.35-1.88) vs. HR = 0.40 (0.22-0.76); Pinteraction = 0.16 for sudden cardiac death., Conclusion: Among patients with non-ischaemic systolic HF, diabetes was associated with higher incidence of all-cause mortality, primarily driven by cardiovascular mortality including SCD. Treatment effect of ICD therapy was not significantly modified by diabetes which might be due to lack of power., (Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. © The Author(s) 2019. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)