Back to Search
Start Over
The effect of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator in patients with diabetes and non-ischaemic systolic heart failure.
- Source :
-
Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology [Europace] 2019 Aug 01; Vol. 21 (8), pp. 1203-1210. - Publication Year :
- 2019
-
Abstract
- Aims: Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) implantation reduce the risk of sudden cardiac death, but not all-cause death in patients with non-ischaemic systolic heart failure (HF). Whether co-existence of diabetes affects ICD treatment effects is unclear.<br />Methods and Results: We examined the effect of ICD implantation on risk of all-cause death, cardiovascular death, and sudden cardiac death (SCD) according to diabetes status at baseline in the Danish Study to Assess the Efficacy of ICDs in Patients with Non-ischaemic Systolic Heart Failure on Mortality (DANISH) trial. Outcomes were analysed by use of cumulative incidence curves and Cox regressions models. Of the 1116 patients enrolled, 211 (19%) had diabetes at baseline. Patients with diabetes were more obese, had worse kidney function and more were in New York Heart Association Class III/IV. The risk of device infections and other complications in the ICD group was similar among patients with and without diabetes (6.1% vs. 4.6% P = 0.54). Irrespective of treatment group, diabetes was associated with higher risk of all-cause death, cardiovascular death, and SCD. The treatment effect of ICD in patients with diabetes vs. patients without diabetes was hazard ratio (HR) = 0.92 (0.57-1.50) vs. HR = 0.85 (0.63-1.13); Pinteraction = 0.60 for all-cause mortality, HR = 0.99 (0.58-1.70) vs. HR = 0.70 (0.48-1.01); Pinteraction = 0.25 for cardiovascular death, and HR = 0.81 (0.35-1.88) vs. HR = 0.40 (0.22-0.76); Pinteraction = 0.16 for sudden cardiac death.<br />Conclusion: Among patients with non-ischaemic systolic HF, diabetes was associated with higher incidence of all-cause mortality, primarily driven by cardiovascular mortality including SCD. Treatment effect of ICD therapy was not significantly modified by diabetes which might be due to lack of power.<br /> (Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. © The Author(s) 2019. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)
- Subjects :
- Cause of Death
Comorbidity
Death, Sudden, Cardiac etiology
Denmark epidemiology
Female
Humans
Incidence
Male
Middle Aged
Mortality
Outcome Assessment, Health Care
Risk Assessment methods
Risk Factors
Death, Sudden, Cardiac prevention & control
Defibrillators, Implantable adverse effects
Diabetes Mellitus epidemiology
Heart Failure, Systolic etiology
Heart Failure, Systolic mortality
Heart Failure, Systolic therapy
Prosthesis Implantation adverse effects
Prosthesis Implantation instrumentation
Prosthesis Implantation methods
Prosthesis-Related Infections epidemiology
Prosthesis-Related Infections etiology
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1532-2092
- Volume :
- 21
- Issue :
- 8
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 31323662
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/euz114