Search

Objective: Evaluation of relevance and feasibility of universal newborn congenital cytomegalovirus infection (cCMVI) screening in saliva.Design: Retrospective, population-based cohort study.Setting: Clamart, France, 2016-2020.Population: All neonates born consecutively in our level III maternity unit.Methods: CMV PCR in saliva for all neonates at birth, and, if positive, CMV PCR in urine to confirm or exclude cCMVI. Prospective and retrospective characterisation of maternal infections. ROC curve analysis to assess saliva PCR performances. Acceptability of screening among staff members evaluated by a survey.Main Outcome Measures: Number of cCMVI neonates; number of expected and unexpected cCMVI.Results: Among 15 341 tested neonates, 63 had cCMVI (birth prevalence of 0.4%, 95% CI 0.3-0.5). In 50% of cases, maternal infection was a non-primary infection (NPI) during pregnancy. cCMVI was expected or suspected (maternal primary infection [PI], antenatal or neonatal signs) in 24/63 neonates (38%), and unexpected in 39/63 neonates (62%). The best CMV saliva threshold to predict cCMVI was 356 (2.55 log) copies/ml [95% CI 2.52 log-3.18 log], with an area under the ROC curve of 0.97. Over 90% of the 72 surveyed staff members reported that the screening was easy and quick. No parent refused the screening.Conclusions: Universal screening for cCMVI with CMV PCR on saliva samples is feasible and highly acceptable to parents and healthcare providers. Over half (62%) of the cases had no prenatal/neonatal signs of cCMVI or a maternal history of CMV infection during pregnancy and would probably not have been diagnosed without universal screening.Tweetable Abstract: In 62% of congenital cytomegalovirus infection cases, only universal neonatal screening in saliva can detect infection. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: Human herpesvirus-8 (HHV-8) can cause Kaposi's sarcoma or B lymphoproliferative disorders such as multicentric Castleman disease. Patient follow-up is based on assessing the HHV-8 viral load, which is usually achieved using real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR). The HHV-8 Premix r-gene kit (BioMérieux) was used by some laboratories in the past, but BioMérieux ceased the production and distribution of this kit in 2021-2022. Other kits need to be tested so that they can be used for diagnostic purposes. Here we evaluated two commercial kits: HHV8 ELITe MGB Kit (ELITech) and Quanty HHV-8 (Clonit) and compared them with the HHV-8 Premix r-gene kit., Methods: We used whole blood samples that had previously been tested with the HHV-8 Premix r-gene kit for diagnostic purposes. Overall, 46 samples (37 HHV-8-positive and 9 HHV-8-negative) were tested with the ELITe MGB Kit and 37 (29 HHV-8-positive and 8 HHV-8-negative) with the Quanty HHV-8 kit. The different methods were compared using Bland-Altman and Passing-Bablok tests with Analyse-it software., Results: Qualitative results were concordant except for one HHV-8 low-positive sample that was found to be negative by the ELITe MGB Kit. The quantitative results were also concordant; both kits showed mean differences of 0.58 log 10 copies/ml and 0.73 log 10 copies/ml, respectively, compared to the Premix r-gene kit., Conclusions: Both the methods tested produced acceptable results and could be used for diagnostic purposes. It should be remembered that there is no international standard for HHV-8 quantification and that patients should always be followed using the same method., Competing Interests: The authors have no competing interests to declare., (© 2024 The Authors.)

(1) Background: In a period where systematic screening of CMV during pregnancy is still debated, diagnosis of non primary infection (NPI) remains challenging and an obstacle to systematic screening. Our aim is to report kinetics of serological and molecular CMV markers of NPI. (2) Methods: We identified immunocompetent pregnant women with CMV NPI as women known to be seropositive for CMV before pregnancy who gave birth to cCMV infected infants. We performed CMV-IgG, CMV-IgM, CMV-IgG avidity and CMV PCR retrospectively on sequential serum samples collected during pregnancy. (3) Results: We collected 195 serum samples from 53 pregnant women with NPI during pregnancy. For 29/53 (55%) patients, no markers of active infection were observed (stable IgG titers, negative IgM and negative PCR). CMV PCR was positive in at least one serum for 18/53 (34%) patients and median viral load was 46 copies/mL, IQR (21-65). (4) Conclusions: For more than half of patients with confirmed CMV NPI during pregnancy, available diagnostic tools are liable to fail in detecting an active infection. These should therefore not be used and universal neonatal screening for CMV remains the only way to detect all cCMV infections.

Objective: Evaluation of relevance and feasibility of universal newborn congenital cytomegalovirus infection (cCMVI) screening in saliva., Design: Retrospective, population-based cohort study., Setting: Clamart, France, 2016-2020., Population: All neonates born consecutively in our level III maternity unit., Methods: CMV PCR in saliva for all neonates at birth, and, if positive, CMV PCR in urine to confirm or exclude cCMVI. Prospective and retrospective characterisation of maternal infections. ROC curve analysis to assess saliva PCR performances. Acceptability of screening among staff members evaluated by a survey., Main Outcome Measures: Number of cCMVI neonates; number of expected and unexpected cCMVI., Results: Among 15 341 tested neonates, 63 had cCMVI (birth prevalence of 0.4%, 95% CI 0.3-0.5). In 50% of cases, maternal infection was a non-primary infection (NPI) during pregnancy. cCMVI was expected or suspected (maternal primary infection [PI], antenatal or neonatal signs) in 24/63 neonates (38%), and unexpected in 39/63 neonates (62%). The best CMV saliva threshold to predict cCMVI was 356 (2.55 log) copies/ml [95% CI 2.52 log-3.18 log], with an area under the ROC curve of 0.97. Over 90% of the 72 surveyed staff members reported that the screening was easy and quick. No parent refused the screening., Conclusions: Universal screening for cCMVI with CMV PCR on saliva samples is feasible and highly acceptable to parents and healthcare providers. Over half (62%) of the cases had no prenatal/neonatal signs of cCMVI or a maternal history of CMV infection during pregnancy and would probably not have been diagnosed without universal screening., Tweetable Abstract: In 62% of congenital cytomegalovirus infection cases, only universal neonatal screening in saliva can detect infection., (© 2021 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

A massive and self-limited release of tumor necrosis factor and interferon gamma was detected in the systemic circulation in 35 consecutive renal allograft recipients by specific radioimmunoassays very soon following the first injection of the monoclonal antibody OKT3 (anti-CD3). Peak serum TNF and IFN gamma levels were reached, respectively, at 1 and 4 hr following the first OKT3 injection. Abnormally high serum interleukin 2 levels were also observed 4 hr following the first OKT3 injection in a minority of patients (5 cases). OKT3 had no effect on interleukin 1 beta, interferon alpha, and granulocyte/macrophage colony stimulating factor serum levels, which in all patients remained within the normal range throughout the study. This selective OKT3-induced cytokine release, which only followed the first injection, was transient (i.e., lasting a few hours). It tightly paralleled the spontaneously reversible clinical syndrome characterized by high fever, headaches, and gastrointestinal symptoms that is invariably associated with the first OKT3 administration. Importantly, when administered in adequate dosages and with adequate timing, corticosteroids influenced both the cytokine release and the systemic reaction. Thus, the highest TNF, IFN gamma, and IL-2 serum levels were detected in patients who did not receive corticosteroids. Patients who received high-dose corticosteroids (1 g solumedrol bolus) concomitantly with the first OKT3 injection still had high TNF and IFN gamma levels. Conversely, when the same corticosteroid dose was injected 15-60 min prior to the first OKT3 injection, in all cases the increase of serum TNF and IFN gamma was significantly lower as compared with the above-described groups; IL-2 levels did not rise. These data offer a direct explanation for one major side effect of OKT3 and thus provide the basis for devising means to prevent its occurrence.