Search

Acalabrutinib received approval for the treatment of adult patients with mantle cell lymphoma who received at least 1 prior therapy and adult patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia or small lymphocytic lymphoma. This study investigated the impact of hepatic impairment (HI) on acalabrutinib pharmacokinetics (PK) and safety at a single 50-mg dose in fasted subjects. This study was divided into 2 parts: study 1, an open-label, parallel-group study in Child-Pugh class A or B subjects and healthy subjects; and study 2, an open-label, parallel-group study in Child-Pugh class C subjects and healthy subjects. Baseline characteristics and safety profiles were similar across groups. Acalabrutinib exposure (area under the plasma concentration-time curve) increased slightly (1.90- and 1.48-fold) in subjects with mild (Child-Pugh class A) and moderate (Child-Pugh class B) hepatic impairment compared with healthy subjects. In severe hepatic impairment (Child-Pugh class C), acalabrutinib exposure (area under the plasma concentration-time curve and maximum plasma concentration) increased ≈5.0- and 3.6-fold, respectively. Results were consistent across total and unbound exposures. Severe hepatic impairment did not impact total/unbound metabolite (ACP-5862) exposures; the metabolite-to-parent ratio decreased to 0.6 to 0.8 (vs 3.1-3.6 in healthy subjects). In summary, single oral dose of 50-mg acalabrutinib was safe and well tolerated in subjects with mild, moderate, and severe hepatic impairment and in healthy control subjects. In subjects with severe hepatic impairment, mean acalabrutinib exposure increased by up to 5-fold and should be avoided. Acalabrutinib does not require dose adjustment in patients with mild or moderate hepatic impairment.

Ferric pyrophosphate citrate (FPC) is indicated to maintain hemoglobin in patients with stage 5 hemodialysis-dependent chronic kidney disease on chronic hemodialysis by addition to the dialysate. An intravenous (IV) FPC presentation containing 6.75 mg of iron in 4.5 mL was developed. The objective was to establish the equivalence of iron delivery via dialysate and IV infusion using a pharmacokinetic approach. An open-label, randomized, multiple-period, single-dose, crossover study was conducted in 27 patients with CKD-5HD. Each patient received (1) a basal iron profile over 12 hours, (2) FPC 6.75 mg Fe IV predialyzer, (3) FPC 6.75 mg Fe IV postdialyzer, and (4) FPC 2 μM (110 μg Fe/L of hemodialysate). Serum and plasma iron was analyzed for total Fe and transferrin bound iron (TBI). Equivalence was determined by comparing maximum observed concentration and area under the concentration-time curve from time 0 to the last observation of 110 μg Fe/L of hemodialysate (reference) and test treatments Fe predialyzer and postdialyzer iron profiles. The main outcome measure was the measurement of bioequivalence between the reference and test treatments. Bioequivalence parameters showed that infusion of FPC iron IV, predialyzer and postdialyzer delivered equivalent iron as via hemodialysate. The increment in serum total Fe from predialysis to postdialysis was the same as observed in the long-term clinical studies of FPC. FPC IV was well tolerated. IV infusion of 6.75 mg iron as FPC during 3 hours of HD delivers an equivalent amount of iron as when Triferic is delivered via hemodialysate. The IV presentation of FPC extends the ability to provide FPC iron to all patients receiving hemodialysis or hemodiafiltration.

STUDY OBJECTIVE Lefamulin is a novel IV and oral pleuromutilin recently approved for the treatment of community-acquired bacterial pneumonia (CABP). Given that renal comorbidities are common in patients admitted for CABP, understanding the pharmacokinetics of lefamulin in the face of severe renal impairment, including those requiring hemodialysis, is needed. DESIGN Open-label, Phase-1 pharmacokinetic study. SETTING Research Study Center. PATIENTS Twenty-three matched subjects were included, seven with "Normal" renal function (creatinine clearance >90 ml/min), eight with "Severe" renal impairment (glomerular filtration rate

Study objective Lefamulin is a novel pleuromutilin recently approved by the FDA for the treatment of community-acquired bacterial pneumonia. Given that lefamulin is primarily metabolized by CYP450 Phase-1 reactions, this study evaluated the pharmacokinetics of IV lefamulin in subjects with various degrees of hepatic impairment as compared with matched healthy subjects. Design Open-label, Phase 1 clinical pharmacokinetic study SETTING: Research Study Center PATIENTS: Twenty-seven subjects; comprised of 11 individuals with normal hepatic function and eight each with moderate or severe hepatic impairment were included, as classified by Child-Pugh scores. Measurements and main result Subjects were administered a single dose of IV lefamulin 150 mg over 1 hour. Plasma was collected for 48 hours and analyzed for lefamulin and its major metabolite, BC-8041, concentrations in addition to assessing lefamulin plasma protein binding. Pharmacokinetics were evaluated by noncompartmental analysis. Pharmacokinetic parameters were compared using least square geometric mean ratios. Lefamulin was well tolerated in all hepatic function groups. Statistical analyses revealed reductions in Cmax and increases in renal clearance for Moderate and Severe groups, as well as, increased volume of distribution for the Severe group. Lefamulin plasma AUC mean (SD) was similar across groups at 7615 (1554), 8233 (2286), and 8938 (1640) h·ng/mL for Normal, Moderate, and Severe groups, respectively, despite decreased clearance observed primarily during terminal elimination phases. Decreased plasma protein binding was seen in hepatically-impaired versus normal subjects. Conclusion Lefamulin was generally well tolerated. Differences in lefamulin and BC-8041 pharmacokinetics were small, relative to the overall variability, and any changes appear to be compensated by increases in renal clearance and decreased protein binding.

SummaryBackground Brigatinib, a next-generation anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) inhibitor, targets activated, mutant forms of ALK and overcomes mechanisms of resistance to the ALK inhibitors crizotinib, ceritinib, and alectinib. Brigatinib is approved in multiple countries for treatment of patients with ALK-positive non–small cell lung cancer. Based on population pharmacokinetic (PK) analyses, no dosage adjustment is required for patients with mild or moderate renal impairment. Methods An open-label, single-dose study was conducted to evaluate the PK of brigatinib (90 mg) in patients with severe renal impairment (estimated glomerular filtration rate 2; n = 8) and matched healthy volunteers with normal renal function (estimated glomerular filtration rate ≥ 90 mL/min/1.73 m2; n = 8). Plasma and urine were collected for the determination of plasma protein binding and estimation of plasma and urine PK parameters. Results Plasma protein binding of brigatinib was similar between patients with severe renal impairment (92 % bound) and matched healthy volunteers with normal renal function (91 % bound). Unbound brigatinib exposure (area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity) was approximately 92 % higher in patients with severe renal impairment compared with healthy volunteers with normal renal function. The renal clearance of brigatinib in patients with severe renal impairment was approximately 20 % of that observed in volunteers with normal renal function. Conclusions These findings support a brigatinib dosage reduction of approximately 50 % in patients with severe renal impairment.Trial registry: Not applicable.

Gepotidacin is a novel triazaacenaphthylene bacterial topoisomerase inhibitor. This phase 1 nonrandomized, open‐label, multicenter, 2‐part study evaluated the pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability of oral gepotidacin 1500 mg in 3 different hepatic settings (normal, moderate impairment, and severe impairment). Gepotidacin was safe and generally tolerated in all subjects. Compared to subjects with normal hepatic function, gepotidacin plasma area under the plasma concentration–time curve from time 0 to infinity (AUC0–∞) and maximum concentration significantly increased by 1.7‐ and 1.9‐fold, respectively, in severe hepatic impairment; increases in moderate impairment were not statistically significant. No significant effect was observed for gepotidacin plasma elimination half‐life (geometric mean range, 8.2–9.1 hours) across hepatic groups. Renal clearance increased in moderate (16%) and severe (52%) hepatic impairment vs normal. The mean fraction of gepotidacin dose excreted in urine increased with increasing hepatic impairment (normal, 7.5%; moderate, 11.2%; and severe, 19.9%). Urine gepotidacin concentrations remained high for 12 hours in all hepatic groups after dosing. Saliva gepotidacin concentrations displayed a linear relationship with plasma concentrations (R2 = 0.76). The ratio of saliva AUC to unbound plasma AUC and elimination half‐life were not affected by hepatic impairment. These data indicate that gepotidacin dose adjustment is not required in mild to moderate hepatic impairment; severe hepatic impairment may require increases in dosing interval or dose reduction.

This open label, parallel‐group study investigated the pharmacokinetics and safety of a single oral 2‐mg dose of the novel selective progesterone receptor modulator vilaprisan in participants with impaired renal function compared with age, weight, sex, and race matched controls with normal renal function. Systemic exposure (area under the plasma concentration–time curve [AUC]) and maximum observed concentrations (Cmax) were compared among 9 participants with moderate renal impairment and matched controls by ANOVA. An additional 4 participants, each with severe renal impairment or normal renal function, contributed to a linear regression analysis exploring any monotone relationship between individual variables and the estimated glomerular filtration rate. The geometric mean AUC was increased by a factor of 1.35 in renally impaired participants compared to normal controls (not statistically significant: least squares mean, 1.346; 90% confidence interval, 0.918‐1.973). Cmax was similar in participants with moderate renal impairment and normal renal function (least squares mean, 1.026; 90% confidence interval, 0.779‐1.351). Considering the overall variability, there was no correlation between renal function (estimated glomerular filtration rate) and Cmax or AUC of vilaprisan. Single oral administration of vilaprisan 2 mg was well tolerated by all participants, both men and women and irrespective of renal function. The incidence of treatment‐emergent adverse events was similar across all groups. Results from this study do not indicate that a dose adjustment will be necessary for vilaprisan when treating patients up to moderate renal impairment.

Itacitinib is a novel, selective, Janus kinase 1 inhibitor in development for treatment of graft‐versus‐host disease. The objective of this study was to assess pharmacokinetics and safety of 300‐mg itacitinib dosed in participants with normal renal function (n = 10), severe renal impairment (n = 8), and end‐stage renal disease (ESRD) on hemodialysis (n = 8). Serial plasma and urine samples (urine from normal and severe groups only) were collected before dosing until 72 hours after dosing. In the ESRD group, itacitinib was evaluated in 2 periods, when dosed before (period 1) and after (period 2) a hemodialysis session. Geometric mean ratios (90% confidence interval) in participants with severe renal impairment, ESRD period 1 and ESRD period 2 relative to participants with normal renal function were 1.65 (1.13‐2.39), 0.71 (0.49‐1.03), and 0.83 (0.57‐1.20) for maximum plasma drug concentration and 2.23 (1.56‐3.18), 0.81 (0.57‐1.16), and 0.95 (0.66‐1.35) for area under the plasma concentration–time curve from time zero to infinity. Itacitinib was well tolerated, and 3 grade 1 treatment‐emergent adverse events were reported over the course of the study. Given the magnitude of exposure changes in participants with severe renal impairment or ESRD and the historic risk‐benefit profile, no dose adjustment is recommended for itacitinib in patients with impaired renal function, although the final dosage recommendation will be based on cumulative pharmacokinetics and safety from this study and from the pivotal graft‐versus‐host disease trial. Additionally, itacitinib may be administered to patients undergoing dialysis regardless of the time of dialysis.

Background: Futibatinib, an irreversible FGFR1-4 inhibitor, is indicated for the treatment of adult patients with previously treated, unresectable, locally advanced or metastatic intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma harboring FGFR2 gene fusions or other rearrangements. As the primary elimination pathway for futibatinib is hepatic metabolism, we conducted a phase 1 study to evaluate the effect of hepatic impairment (HI) on futibatinib pharmacokinetics (PK) and safety in healthy adults. Methods: A single oral dose of 20 mg futibatinib was administered to adult subjects with mild (Child-Pugh score, 5-6), moderate (7-9), or severe (10-15) HI. Control healthy subjects were matched to each HI cohort according to age, body mass index, and sex. Intensive PK samples were collected up to 72 hours post-dose. Exposure measures (AUC0-inf, AUC0-t, and Cmax) in subjects with HI were compared with matching control cohorts and with the overall healthy-control cohort. Relationships between plasma PK and HI were examined graphically via scatter/regression plots of PK parameters versus baseline Child-Pugh score, bilirubin, albumin, international normalized ratio, and aspartate aminotransferase. Results: Overall, 38 subjects were enrolled (mild HI, n = 8; moderate HI, n = 8; severe HI, n = 6; healthy controls, n = 16). Following the administration of futibatinib, no trend was observed between the severity of HI and the extent of futibatinib exposure increase. Compared with matched controls, AUC0-inf increased by 21%, 20% and 18%, and Cmax by 43%, 15%, and 10% in subjects with mild, moderate, and severe HI, respectively. Changes in exposure were not considered clinically relevant as geometric mean ratios were within 80-125% bioequivalence limits, except for Cmax in subjects with mild HI (43%). Futibatinib PK parameters and HI measures did not appear to be associated based on visual inspection or statistical evaluation of regression plots (p-values all > 0.05). No subjects discontinued from the study due to treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). Overall, two (12.5%) subjects in the healthy-control cohort reported one Grade 1 TEAE each (dyspepsia and headache) and two (25.0 %) subjects in the mild HI cohort each reported one Grade 1 TEAE (toothache and headache). All TEAEs were considered related to treatment. No subjects with moderate/severe HI reported TEAEs. Conclusions: No clinically meaningful differences in the systemic plasma exposure of futibatinib were observed based on the severity of HI. Single oral doses of futibatinib were well tolerated among subjects with varying degrees of HI and matched healthy adult subjects in this study. The data suggest that dose adjustment may not be necessary in patients with HI receiving futibatinib 20 mg QD for its approved indication. Citation Format: Ling Gao, Ikuo Yamamiya, Mark Pinti, Juan Carlos Rondón, Thomas Marbury, Gareth Tomlinson, Lukas Makris, Nanae Hangai, Volker Wacheck. Phase 1, open-label, single-dose study to evaluate the effect of hepatic impairment on the pharmacokinetics and safety of futibatinib in adult subjects [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2023; Part 2 (Clinical Trials and Late-Breaking Research); 2023 Apr 14-19; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(8_Suppl):Abstract nr CT192.

Upadacitinib is a selective Janus kinase 1 inhibitor being developed for the treatment of several inflammatory autoimmune diseases, including rheumatoid arthritis. Upadacitinib is a nonsensitive substrate for metabolism by cytochrome P450 3A enzymes. This open‐label, single‐dose, multicenter study assessed the pharmacokinetics of upadacitinib following oral administration of a single 15‐mg dose of the upadacitinib extended‐release formulation in subjects with mild (n = 6) and moderate (n = 6) hepatic impairment relative to demographically matched healthy subjects (n = 6). Subjects were assigned to 1 of the 3 groups according to the Child‐Pugh classification. Relative to subjects with normal hepatic function, the ratios (90% confidence intervals) of upadacitinib area under the plasma concentration‐versus‐time profile from time 0 to infinity (AUCinf) for subjects with mild and moderate hepatic impairment were 1.28 (0.91‐1.79) and 1.24 (0.87‐1.76), respectively. The central ratios of upadacitinib maximum observed concentration (Cmax) were 1.04 (0.77‐1.39) and 1.43 (1.05‐1.95) in subjects with mild and moderate hepatic impairment, respectively, compared with subjects with normal hepatic function. No clinically significant changes in vital signs or hematology measurements were observed, and no new safety events were identified in this study. These results indicate that mild and moderate hepatic impairment has no clinically relevant effect on upadacitinib pharmacokinetics.

Solriamfetol (JZP‐110), a selective dopamine and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor with wake‐promoting effects, is renally excreted ∼90% unchanged within 48 hours. Effects of renal impairment and hemodialysis on the pharmacokinetics and safety of 75‐mg single‐dose solriamfetol were evaluated in adults with normal renal function (n = 6); mild (n = 6), moderate (n = 6), or severe (n = 6) renal impairment; and end‐stage renal disease (ESRD) with and without hemodialysis (n = 7). Relative to normal renal function, geometric mean area under the plasma concentration–time curve from time zero to infinity increased 53%, 129%, and 339%, and mean half‐life was 1.2‐, 1.9‐, and 3.9‐fold higher with mild, moderate, and severe renal impairment, respectively. Renal excretion of unchanged solriamfetol over 48 hours was 85.8%, 80.0%, 66.4%, and 57.1% in normal, mild, moderate, and severe renal impairment groups, respectively; mean maximum concentration and time to maximum concentration did not vary substantially. Decreases in solriamfetol clearance were proportional to decreases in estimated glomerular filtration rate. Geometric mean area under the plasma concentration–time curve from time zero to time of last quantifiable concentration increased 357% and 518% vs normal in ESRD with and without hemodialysis, respectively, with half‐life >100 hours in both groups. Over the 4‐hour hemodialysis period, ∼21% of solriamfetol dose was removed. Adverse events included headache (n = 1) and nausea (n = 1). Six days after dosing, 1 participant had increased alanine and aspartate aminotransferase, leading to study discontinuation. While these adverse events were deemed study‐drug related, they were mild and resolved. Results from this study combined with population pharmacokinetic modeling/simulation suggest that solriamfetol dosage adjustments are necessary in patients with moderate or severe but not with mild renal impairment. Due to significant exposure increase/prolonged half‐life, dosing is not recommended in patients with ESRD.

Capmatinib, a mesenchymal-epithelial transition factor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, is metabolized by cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 and aldehyde oxidase. In individuals with hepatic impairment, alterations in hepatobiliary excretion and metabolism could lead to higher capmatinib exposure. We compared the pharmacokinetics of a single oral dose of capmatinib 200 mg administered to participants with varying degrees of hepatic impairment vs. matched controls with normal hepatic function.This phase 1, multicentre, open-label, parallel-group study enrolled adult participants with normal hepatic function and mild, moderate and severe hepatic impairments. Eligible participants received a single oral dose of 200 mg capmatinib. The pharmacokinetic parameters of capmatinib were analysed and compared across participants with impaired and normal hepatic function.Of 31 enrolled participants, 29 had an evaluable pharmacokinetic profile: normal (n = 9); mild (n = 6); moderate (n = 8); severe (n = 6). Compared with the normal group, geometric mean (GM) maximum (peak) observed plasma drug concentration after single-dose administration decreased by 27.6% in the mild group (GM ratio [GMR] = 0.724; 90% confidence interval [CI]: 0.476-1.10), by 17.2% in the moderate group (GMR = 0.828; 90% CI: 0.563-1.22) and remained unchanged in the severe group (GMR = 1.02; 90% CI: 0.669-1.55). Compared with the normal group, GM area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity decreased by 23.3% in the mild group (GMR = 0.767; 90% CI: 0.532-1.11), by 8.6% in the moderate group (GMR = 0.914; 90% CI: 0.652-1.28) and increased by 24% in the severe group (GMR = 1.24; 90% CI: 0.858-1.78).Mild, moderate and severe hepatic impairment did not have a clinically relevant impact on capmatinib pharmacokinetics. No new safety findings are reported in this study.

Renal impairment (RI) is known to influence the pharmacokinetics of nonrenally eliminated drugs, although the mechanism and clinical impact is poorly understood. We assessed the impact of RI and single dose oral rifampin (RIF) on the pharmacokinetics of CYP3A, OATP1B, P-gp, and BCRP substrates using a microdose cocktail and OATP1B endogenous biomarkers. RI alone had no impact on midazolam (MDZ), maximum plasma concentration (Cmax ), and area under the curve (AUC), but a progressive increase in AUC with RI severity for dabigatran (DABI), and up to ~2-fold higher AUC for pitavastatin (PTV), rosuvastatin (RSV), and atorvastatin (ATV) for all degrees of RI was observed. RIF did not impact MDZ, had a progressively smaller DABI drug-drug interaction (DDI) with increasing RI severity, a similar 3.1-fold to 4.4-fold increase in PTV and RSV AUC in healthy volunteers and patients with RI, and a diminishing DDI with RI severity from 6.1-fold to 4.7-fold for ATV. Endogenous biomarkers of OATP1B (bilirubin, coproporphyrin I/III, and sulfated bile salts) were generally not impacted by RI, and RIF effects on these biomarkers in RI were comparable or larger than those in healthy volunteers. The lack of a trend with RI severity of PTV and several OATP1B biomarkers, suggests that mechanisms beyond RI directly impacting OATP1B activity could also be considered. The DABI, RSV, and ATV data suggest an impact of RI on intestinal P-gp, and potentially BCRP activity. Therefore, DDI data from healthy volunteers may represent a worst-case scenario for clinically derisking P-gp and BCRP substrates in the setting of RI.

Upadacitinib is a novel selective Janus kinase 1 inhibitor developed for treatment of rheumatoid arthritis and other autoimmune diseases. The objective of this study was to assess the pharmacokinetics and safety of a single upadacitinib dose in subjects with normal renal function and in subjects with renal impairment. A total of 24 subjects between the ages of 18 and 75 years were assigned to 1 of 4 renal function groups based on estimated glomerular filtration rate (normal, mild, moderate, severe; N = 6/group). A single 15‐mg dose of upadacitinib extended‐release formulation was administered under fasting conditions. Serial plasma and urine samples were assayed to evaluate the effect of renal impairment on upadacitinib exposure through regression analysis and analysis of covariance. The primary analysis was the regression analysis of upadacitinib exposures versus estimated glomerular filtration rate. The point estimates for upadacitinib plasma exposure ratios (90% confidence interval [CI]) in subjects with mild, moderate, and severe renal impairment were 1.18 (90%CI, 1.06–1.32), 1.33 (90%CI, 1.11–1.59), and 1.44 (90%CI, 1.14–1.82) for area under the plasma concentration–time curve and 1.06 (90%CI, 0.92–1.23), 1.11 (90%CI, 0.88–1.40), and 1.14 (90%CI, 0.84–1.56) for maximum observed plasma concentration, respectively, relative to subjects with normal renal function based on the regression analysis. The analysis of covariance categorical analysis provided consistent results. Upadacitinib was well tolerated by all subjects, and no safety issues were identified in subjects with renal impairment. Renal impairment has a limited effect on upadacitinib pharmacokinetics. This is in agreement with the known limited role of urinary excretion in upadacitinib elimination. Based on the limited impact on exposure, no dose adjustment is necessary for upadacitinib in subjects with impaired renal function.

This study characterized the effects of hepatic impairment on the pharmacokinetics and safety of glecaprevir and pibrentasvir, two direct-acting antivirals used for treatment of chronic HCV infection. HCV-negative subjects with normal hepatic function, or with mild (Child-Pugh [CP]-A), moderate (CP-B), or severe (CP-C) hepatic impairment received single doses of pibrentasvir 120 mg alone or with glecaprevir 200 mg or 300 mg (n = 6/functional group/dose). Plasma pharmacokinetics and protein binding were evaluated. Doses were separated by ≥ 14 days of washout. For the approved combination of glecaprevir 300 mg with pibrentasvir 120 mg, glecaprevir AUC was increased by 33% (CP-A), to 2.0-fold (CP-B), and to 11-fold (CP-C) relative to normal subjects; pibrentasvir AUC was ≤ 26% different (CP-A or CP-B) and increased to 2.1-fold (CP-C). For glecaprevir 200 mg with pibrentasvir 120 mg, glecaprevir AUC was increased by 80% (CP-A) or to 2.8-fold (CP-B), while pibrentasvir AUC was unaffected in the same subjects (≤ 12% difference). Pibrentasvir 120 mg alone AUC increased 51% (CP-A), 31% (CP-B), and to 5.2-fold (CP-C). The unbound fraction of glecaprevir was higher in CP-C subjects than normal subjects and pibrentasvir protein binding was similar across groups. The most common adverse event was headache; no events were serious. This study supported evaluation of the glecaprevir 300 mg with pibrentasvir 120-mg combination in HCV-infected subjects with CP-A hepatic impairment without dose adjustment. Elevated glecaprevir and/or pibrentasvir exposures are expected in HCV-infected patients with CP-B or CP-C hepatic impairment.

Mirogabalin is an α2δ ligand being developed to treat neuropathic pain. A small fraction of mirogabalin is metabolized by the liver, where hepatic impairment may affect exposure. The objective of this phase I, open-label single-dose study was to determine if mild or moderate hepatic impairment alters the pharmacokinetics of mirogabalin. Serial blood samples were collected for determination of maximum observed concentration, time to maximum concentration, and area under the concentration–time curve until the last quantifiable concentration of the active free form (A200-700) and inactive lactam metabolite (A204-4455) of mirogabalin. The A200-700 maximum observed concentration was similar in subjects with mild hepatic impairment but lower in subjects with moderate hepatic impairment vs. control subjects. The A204-4455 maximum observed concentration was lower in subjects with mild and moderate hepatic impairment vs. control groups. The A200-700 area under the concentration–time curve until the last quantifiable concentration was slightly lower in subjects with mild hepatic impairment and slightly higher in subjects with moderate hepatic impairment vs. control subjects. Peak A204-4455 levels were approximately 22% and 31% lower for subjects with mild and moderate hepatic impairment vs. control individuals, respectively. Exposure to A204-4455 was approximately 37% lower in subjects with mild hepatic impairment but unaffected in subjects with moderate hepatic impairment vs. control groups. Two subjects in the mild hepatic impairment group reported a treatment-emergent adverse event of mild somnolence. No serious or severe treatment-emergent adverse events, discontinuations as a result of treatment-emergent adverse events, or deaths were reported. Mild hepatic impairment resulted in lower A200-700 and A204-4455 exposure, while moderate hepatic impairment did not affect A200-700 exposure. Overall, mild-to-moderate hepatic impairment did not have a significant effect on mirogabalin exposure. A single 15-mg dose of mirogabalin was well tolerated by subjects with mild or moderate hepatic impairment.

Background and Objective Verinurad (RDEA3170) is a high-affinity, selective URAT1 transporter inhibitor in development for treating gout and asymptomatic hyperuricemia. This Phase I, single-dose study investigated the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and safety of verinurad in adults with renal impairment and controls with normal renal function. Methods Males aged 18–85 years were enrolled with serum urate (sUA) 4.5–10 mg/dl and creatinine clearance 60–

The pharmacokinetics and safety of velpatasvir, a potent pangenotypic hepatitis C virus NS5A inhibitor, were evaluated in two hepatic impairment studies: a phase I study in hepatitis C virus-uninfected subjects and a phase III study (ASTRAL-4) in hepatitis C virus-infected patients. In the phase I study, subjects with moderate or severe hepatic impairment (Child-Pugh-Turcotte Class B or C), and demographically matched subjects with normal hepatic function received a single dose of velpatasvir 100 mg. Pharmacokinetics and safety assessments were performed, and pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated using non-compartmental methods and summarized using descriptive statistics and compared statistically by geometric least-squares mean ratios and 90% confidence intervals. In ASTRAL-4, subjects with decompensated cirrhosis (Child-Pugh-Turcotte Class B) were randomized to receive treatment with either sofosbuvir/velpatasvir ± ribavirin for 12 weeks or sofosbuvir/velpatasvir for 24 weeks. Pharmacokinetic and safety assessments were performed and pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated using a non-compartmental analysis and summarized using descriptive statistics and were compared to pharmacokinetics from ASTRAL-1 [subjects without cirrhosis or with compensated (Child-Pugh-Turcotte Class A) cirrhosis]. In the phase I study, plasma exposures (area under the concentration–time curve) were similar in subjects with Child-Pugh-Turcotte Class B (n = 10) or Child-Pugh-Turcotte Class C hepatic impairment (n = 10) compared with normal hepatic function (n = 13). Percent free velpatasvir was similar in subjects without or with any degree of hepatic impairment. In the phase III study, velpatasvir overall exposure (area under the concentration–time curve over the 24-h dosing interval; AUCtau) was similar and sofosbuvir exposures were higher (~ 100%) for patients with Child-Pugh-Turcotte Class B hepatic impairment compared with the ASTRAL-1 population, which was not considered clinically relevant. No sofosbuvir/velpatasvir dose modification is warranted for patients with any degree of hepatic impairment.

The combination of elbasvir and grazoprevir is approved for the treatment of hepatitis C virus genotype 1 or 4 infection. To evaluate the pharmacokinetics and safety of single-dose elbasvir 50 mg in participants with hepatic impairment. Participants with mild, moderate, or severe hepatic impairment and age-, sex-, and weight-matched healthy controls were enrolled in a 3-part, open-label, sequential-panel, single-dose pharmacokinetic study. Blood samples were collected to assess pharmacokinetics. Safety and tolerability were assessed throughout the study. Thirty-four participants were enrolled: eight with mild hepatic impairment, 11 with moderate hepatic impairment, seven with severe hepatic impairment, and eight healthy matched controls. Participants with mild, moderate, and severe hepatic impairment demonstrated a numeric, but not statistically significant, decrease in elbasvir exposure compared with controls, with a mean 39, 28, and 12% decrease in area under the concentration–time curve from time 0 extrapolated to infinity, as well as a 42, 31, and 42% decrease in maximum plasma concentration (C max), respectively. The observed median time to C max was similar in participants with hepatic impairment and controls. Single-dose administration of elbasvir was well tolerated. The pharmacokinetics of elbasvir after a single, oral 50-mg dose were not clinically meaningfully altered in non–HCV-infected participants with mild, moderate, or severe hepatic dysfunction. However, since elbasvir is currently available only as part of a fixed-dose combination with grazoprevir, the fixed-dose combination should not be administered to patients with moderate or severe hepatic impairment, due to the significantly increased plasma grazoprevir exposures in those populations.

Introduction Amenamevir (ASP2151) is a nonnucleoside human herpesvirus helicase-primase inhibitor that was approved in Japan for the treatment of herpes zoster (shingles) in 2017. This article reports the results of two clinical trials that investigated the effects of renal and hepatic impairment on the pharmacokinetics of amenamevir. Methods These studies were phase 1, open-label, single-dose (oral 400 mg), parallel-group studies evaluating the pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability of amenamevir in healthy participants and participants with moderate hepatic impairment and mild, moderate, and severe renal impairment. Results In the hepatic impairment study, the pharmacokinetic profile of amenamevir in participants with moderate hepatic impairment was generally similar to that of participants with normal hepatic function. In the renal impairment study, the area under the amenamevir concentration versus time curve from the time of dosing up to the time of the last sample with extrapolation to infinity of the terminal phase was increased by 78.1% in participants with severe renal impairment. There was a positive relationship between creatinine clearance and oral and renal clearance for amenamevir in the renal impairment study. In both studies, amenamevir was safe and well tolerated. Conclusion The findings of the hepatic impairment study indicate that no dosing adjustment is required in patients with moderate hepatic impairment. In the renal impairment study, systemic amenamevir exposure was increased by renal impairment. However, it is unlikely that renal impairment will have a significant effect on the safety of amenamevir given that in previous pharmacokinetic and safety studies in healthy individuals amenamevir was safe and well tolerated after a single dose (5–2400 mg, fasted condition) and repeated doses for 7 days (300 or 600 mg, fed condition), and the amount of amenamevir exposure in the renal impairment study was covered by those studies. These findings suggest that amenamevir does not require dosage reduction in accordance with the creatinine clearance Funding Astellas Pharma.

Background The pharmacokinetics and tolerability of semaglutide, a once-weekly human glucagon-like peptide-1 analog in development for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus, were investigated in subjects with/without renal impairment (RI). Methods Fifty-six subjects, categorized into renal function groups [normal, mild, moderate, severe, and end-stage renal disease (ESRD)], received a single subcutaneous dose of semaglutide 0.5 mg. Semaglutide plasma concentrations were assessed ≤480 h post-dose; the primary endpoint was the area under the plasma concentration–time curve from time zero to infinity. Results Semaglutide exposure in subjects with mild/moderate RI and ESRD was similar to that in subjects with normal renal function. In subjects with severe RI, the mean exposure of semaglutide was 22% higher than in subjects with normal renal function, and the 95% confidence interval (1.02–1.47) for the ratio exceeded the pre-specified limits (0.70–1.43). When adjusted for differences in sex, age, and body weight between the groups, all comparisons were within the pre-specified clinically relevant limits. Across RI groups there was no relationship between creatinine clearance (CLCR) and semaglutide exposure, or between CLCR and semaglutide maximum plasma drug concentration (C max). Hemodialysis did not appear to affect the pharmacokinetics of semaglutide. No appreciable changes in safety parameters or vital signs and no serious adverse events were noted. One subject with severe RI reported two major hypoglycemic events. Conclusion When adjusted for differences in sex, age, and body weight, semaglutide exposure was similar between subjects with RI and subjects with normal renal function. Semaglutide (0.5 mg) was well-tolerated. Dose adjustment may not be warranted for subjects with RI. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT00833716.

The pharmacokinetics and safety of single-dose zanubrutinib (80 mg) were assessed in subjects with mild, moderate, and severe hepatic impairment (n = 6 each, Child–Pugh class A, B, and C) relative ...

Aims Two phase 1, open-label studies were conducted to investigate the effect of renal impairment (RI) and organic anion transporter (OAT) inhibition on pharmacokinetics (PK) and safety of relebactam (REL) plus imipenem/cilastatin (IMI). Methods Study PN005 evaluated the PK of REL (125 mg) plus IMI (250 mg) in participants with RI vs healthy controls. Study PN019 evaluated the PK of REL (250 mg) and imipenem (500 mg; dosed as IMI) with/without probenecid (1 g; OAT inhibitor) in healthy adults. Results Geometric mean ratios (RI/healthy matched controls) of area under the concentration-time curve from time 0 to infinity (AUC0-∞ ; 90% confidence interval) for REL, imipenem and cilastatin increased as RI increased from mild (1.6 [1.1, 2.4], 1.4 [1.1, 1.8] and 1.6 [1.0, 2.5], respectively) to severe (4.9 [3.4, 7.0], 2.5 [1.9, 3.3] and 5.6 [3.6, 8.6], respectively). For all 3 analytes, plasma and renal clearance decreased and corresponding plasma apparent terminal half-life increased with increasing RI. Geometric mean ratios ([probenecid+IMI/REL]/[IMI/REL]) of plasma exposure for REL and imipenem were 1.24 (1.19, 1.28) and 1.16 (1.13, 1.20), respectively. The dose fraction excreted (fe) in the urine decreased progressively from mild to severe RI. Probenecid reduced renal clearance of REL and imipenem by 25 and 31%, respectively. Compared with IMI/REL, coadministration of IMI/REL with probenecid yielded lower fe for REL and imipenem. In both studies, treatment was well tolerated; there were no serious adverse events or discontinuations due to adverse events. Conclusion RI increased plasma exposure and similarly decreased clearance of REL, imipenem and cilastatin; IMI/REL dose adjustment (fixed-ratio) will be required for patients with RI. Probenecid had no clinically meaningful impact on the PK of REL or imipenem.

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection causes significant morbidity and mortality in immunocompromised transplant patients. ASP0113, a first-in-class DNA vaccine containing plasmids encoding CMV phosphoprotein 65 and glycoprotein B (gB), was evaluated in a phase 1b, subject-blinded study in CMV-seropositive (n = 13) and CMV-seronegative (n = 12) healthy and CMV-seronegative dialysis subjects (n = 12) randomized to ASP0113 or placebo. End points included pharmacokinetics, anti-gB antibody levels, phosphoprotein 65-specific T-cell responses measured by ex vivo enzyme-linked immune absorbent spot (ELISpot) assay and 10-day cultured ELISpot and Stat T-cell activation assays, and safety. ASP0113 concentrations peaked at 2-10 and 24-48 hours; the pharmacokinetics were similar across groups. No group demonstrated significant anti-gB antibody responses. T-cell responder rates in the cultured ELISpot assay were 8/12 (66.7%, 95%CI 35% to 90%) and 4/12 (33.3%, 95%CI 10% to 65%) in CMV-seronegative healthy subjects and dialysis patients, respectively, whereas ex vivo ELISpot assay response rates were 4/11 (36.4%, 95%CI 11% to 69%) and 0/12, respectively. Responses peaked at week 27, with lower magnitude observed in CMV-seronegative dialysis patients versus CMV-seronegative healthy subjects. No serious adverse events occurred; the most common adverse event in ASP0113-vaccinated patients was injection-site pain (64.9%). Some CMV-seronegative healthy subjects and dialysis patients had T-cell responses; no humoral responses were detected.

Venetoclax is a selective B cell lymphoma-2 inhibitor. It is approved for treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia and is being investigated for other hematological malignancies. Venetoclax is predominantly eliminated by the liver; therefore, there is a need to investigate the effect of hepatic insufficiency on venetoclax pharmacokinetics. A phase I study was carried out in 24 women with normal hepatic function or mild, moderate, or severe hepatic impairment (based on Child–Pugh scores), who received a single 50 mg dose of venetoclax with a low-fat meal. Blood samples were collected up to 120 h after venetoclax administration. Pharmacokinetic parameters were estimated using non-compartmental methods. Venetoclax maximum observed plasma concentration (Cmax) and area under the plasma concentration–time curve (AUC) in subjects with mild or moderate hepatic impairment were similar to subjects with normal hepatic function. Mean venetoclax AUC in subjects with severe hepatic impairment was 2.3- to 2.7-fold higher than in subjects with normal hepatic function. The half-life of venetoclax in subjects with severe hepatic impairment was approximately two-fold longer than in subjects with normal hepatic function and subjects with mild or moderate hepatic impairment. Unbound fractions of venetoclax in subjects with mild, moderate, and severe hepatic impairment were similar to the subjects with normal hepatic function. No significant adverse safety events were reported. No venetoclax dosage adjustment is required in subjects with mild or moderate hepatic impairment. In subjects with severe hepatic impairment, a 50% dose reduction of venetoclax is recommended to account for higher exposures and the longer half-life.

Aims Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents used to treat anaemia in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) have been associated with cardiovascular adverse events. Hepcidin production, controlled by bone morphogenic protein 6 (BMP6), regulates iron homeostasis via interactions with the iron transporter, ferroportin. High hepcidin levels are thought to contribute to increased iron sequestration and subsequent anaemia in CKD patients. To investigate alternative therapies to erythropoiesis-stimulating agents for CKD patients, monoclonal antibodies, LY3113593 and LY2928057, targeting BMP6 and ferroportin respectively, were tested in CKD patients. Methods Preclinical in vitro/vivo data and clinical data in healthy subjects and CKD patients were used to illustrate the translation of pharmacological properties of LY3113593 and LY2928057, highlighting the novelty of targeting these nodes within the hepcidin-ferroportin pathway. Results LY2928057 bound ferroportin and blocked interactions with hepcidin, allowing iron efflux, leading to increased serum iron and transferrin saturation levels and increased hepcidin in monkeys and humans. In CKD patients, LY2928057 led to slower haemoglobin decline and reduction in ferritin (compared to placebo). Serum iron increase was (mean [90% confidence interval]) 1.98 [1.46-2.68] and 1.36 [1.22-1.51] fold-relative to baseline following LY2928057 600 mg and LY311593 150 mg respectively in CKD patients. LY3113593 specifically blocked BMP6 binding to its receptor and produced increases in iron and transferrin saturation and decreases in hepcidin preclinically and clinically. In CKD patients, LY3113593 produced an increase in haemoglobin and reduction in ferritin (compared to placebo). Conclusion LY3113593 and LY2928057 pharmacological effects (serum iron and ferritin) were translated from preclinical-to-clinical development. Such interventions may lead to new CKD anaemia treatments.

Doravirine is a novel, potent, nonnucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitor currently in development for HIV-1 infection treatment. As a substrate for CYP3A-mediated metabolism, doravirine could potentially be affected by liver-function changes. As a portion of the HIV-1-infected population has varying degrees of liver impairment, we investigated the effect of moderate hepatic impairment on the pharmacokinetic profile and tolerability of single-dose doravirine 100 mg in otherwise healthy subjects. A total of 16 subjects aged 44-64 years took part in the open-label, single-dose trial: 8 with moderate hepatic impairment (Child-Pugh score, 7-9; 6 men, 2 women) and 8 healthy individuals (mean age and height matched with the impairment group; 6 men, 2 women). Subjects with hepatic impairment were required to have chronic, stable hepatic impairment with features of cirrhosis of any etiology. Blood sampling revealed that doravirine exposure was similar in both groups. The observed geometric least-squares mean ratio (90% confidence interval; moderately impaired/healthy subjects) was 0.99 (0.72-1.35) for AUC0-∞ , 0.93 (0.74-1.18) for AUC0-24 h , 0.90 (0.66-1.24) for Cmax , and 0.99 (0.74-1.33) for C24 h . Geometric mean apparent terminal t½ was ∼18 hours for both groups, whereas median Tmax was 2 hours (range, 1-6 hours) and 2.5 hours (range, 1-3 hours) for impaired and healthy individuals, respectively. In addition, doravirine was generally well tolerated. The results demonstrate that moderate hepatic impairment does not have a clinically meaningful effect on doravirine pharmacokinetics. Therefore, dose adjustment should not be necessary in patients with both HIV-1 and moderate hepatic impairment.

Two phase I open‐label studies were conducted to investigate the pharmacokinetics (PK), safety, and tolerability of single oral doses of selumetinib in subjects with end‐stage renal disease (ESRD) undergoing hemodialysis and subjects with varying degrees of hepatic impairment; both studies included a matched control group comprised of healthy individuals. In the renal impairment study, subjects received single doses of selumetinib 50 mg; those with ESRD received selumetinib before and after dialysis (with a between‐treatment washout period of ≥7 days). In the hepatic impairment study, subjects received varying single doses of selumetinib (20‐50 mg) depending on liver dysfunction (mild, moderate, or severe as per Child‐Pugh classification). PK, safety, and tolerability data were collected from both studies. Overall, 24 subjects were included in the renal impairment study (ESRD, N = 12; healthy subjects, N = 12). Selumetinib exposure (AUC and Cmax) was not increased in the ESRD group vs healthy subjects. Selumetinib exposure was lower when selumetinib was dosed before vs after dialysis, although individual exposure was variable. Overall, 32 subjects were included in the hepatic impairment study (mild, moderate, and severe impairment, N = 8 per group; healthy subjects, N = 8). Generally, dose‐normalized total selumetinib exposure was increased by 25% to 59% in subjects with moderate and severe hepatic impairment compared with healthy subjects. Increasing Child‐Pugh score, decreasing serum albumin, and increasing prothrombin time correlated with increasing unbound selumetinib exposure. In both studies, selumetinib was well tolerated with no new safety concerns. These studies will inform dose adjustment considerations in patients.

Delafloxacin is a novel anionic fluoroquinolone with robust activity against Gram-positive, Gram-negative, atypical, and anaerobic bacteria, including methicillin-resistant S aureus. Delafloxacin is currently being studied for the treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections and community-acquired pneumonia. This was a phase 1, open-label pharmacokinetic and safety study of a single intravenous dose of 300 mg delafloxacin in subjects with mild, moderate, and severe hepatic impairment (Child-Pugh class A, B, and C, respectively) compared with matched healthy controls. The effects of hepatic impairment were assessed by ANOVA of log-transformed values for AUC0-∞ , Cmax , and systemic clearance, with hepatic group as a fixed effect. Mean AUC0-∞ and Cmax in each impairment group were not significantly different from those of the pooled healthy subjects (P > 0.05). The 90% confidence interval (CI) of the percentage ratios of least-squares means of AUC0-∞ did not indicate significant differences between the impairment groups and pooled healthy controls: Child-Pugh class A (mild) 114.4 (CI: 95.6, 137.0), Child-Pugh class B (moderate) 114.8 (CI: 95.9, 137.4), and Child-Pugh class C (severe) 115.1 (CI: 96.1, 137.8). A single IV infusion of delafloxacin was generally well tolerated in all treatment groups. The exposure and clearance of delafloxacin in subjects with mild, moderate, or severe hepatic impairment did not significantly differ from those of pooled, matched healthy subjects. Based on these pharmacokinetic data, dose adjustment of delafloxacin in the presence of hepatic impairment is not needed.

The direct-acting antiviral agent (DAA) combination of ombitasvir and paritaprevir (administered with ritonavir) with (3D regimen) or without (2D regimen) dasabuvir has shown very high efficacy rates in the treatment of chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. Renal impairment, a common comorbidity in patients with chronic HCV infection, can influence the pharmacokinetics of antiviral agents and hence their efficacy and safety profiles. The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of renal impairment on the pharmacokinetics and tolerability of the 3D and 2D regimens. Overall, 24 subjects, six in each of four renal function groups (normal, mild, moderate, and severe), received a single dose of the 3D and 2D regimens in separate dosing periods. Plasma and urine were analyzed to assess the effect of renal impairment on drug exposure. DAA exposures changed by up to 21, 37, and 50 % in subjects with mild, moderate, and severe renal impairment, respectively, versus subjects with normal renal function. Ritonavir exposure increased with the degree of renal impairment (maximum 114 %). The half-lives of DAAs and ritonavir in subjects with renal impairment were generally comparable with those in healthy subjects. No safety or tolerability concerns arose in this study. The 3D and 2D regimens do not require dose adjustment for patients with HCV infection and concomitant renal impairment.

Cabozantinib is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor approved for the treatment of patients with progressive, metastatic medullary thyroid cancer. Two clinical pharmacology studies were conducted to characterize single-dose pharmacokinetics (PK) of cabozantinib in renally or hepatically impaired subjects. Study 1 enrolled 10 subjects, each with mild or moderate impairment of renal function; 12 healthy subjects were matched to the moderate group for age, sex, and body mass index (BMI). Study 2 enrolled 8 males each with mild or moderate hepatic impairment; 10 healthy males were matched to the moderate group for age, BMI, and ethnicity. All subjects received one 60 mg cabozantinib oral capsule dose followed by PK sampling over 21 days. Plasma concentration and protein binding were determined by liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry and equilibrium dialysis, respectively. PK parameters were computed using noncompartmental methods. Geometric least squared mean (LSM) ratios for plasma cabozantinib AUC0-∞ for impaired to normal organ function cohorts were (1) approximately 30% and 6% higher in subjects with mild and moderate renal impairment, respectively, and (2) approximately 81% and 63% higher in subjects with mild and moderate hepatic impairment, respectively. The percentage of unbound drug was slightly higher in both moderately impaired cohorts. No deaths or discontinuations due to adverse events occurred in either study. Cabozantinib should be used with caution in subjects with mild or moderate renal impairment. Subjects with mild or moderate hepatic impairment administered cabozantinib should be monitored closely for potential treatment-emergent drug toxicity that may necessitate a dose hold or reduction.

Background Taniborbactam is a novel, non-ß-lactam, ß-lactamase inhibitor with activity against serine (Class A, C, D) and metallo (Class B) ß-lactamases including epidemiologically important carbapenemases. Both cefepime and taniborbactam are predominantly renally excreted and are likely to require dose adjustment in patients with renal impairment and end-stage renal disease (ESRD). The current study was designed to evaluate the pharmacokinetics and safety in patients with renal impairment and ESRD. Methods This was a Phase 1, open-label study in subjects with normal renal function (eCLCR ≥ 90 mL/min) matched to subjects with mild, moderate, and severe renal impairment (eGFR 60-89, 30-59, and < 30 mL/min/1.73m2, respectively), and patients with ESRD on hemodialysis. Subjects received a single dose of cefepime 2 g and taniborbactam 500 mg; subjects with ESRD received a single dose before HD and after a 9 day washout period, following HD. PK parameters including AUC0-inf and total body clearance (CL) were evaluated. Safety assessments included adverse events (AEs), vital signs, clinical laboratory evaluations, electrocardiograms, and physical examinations. Results Thirty-three subjects were enrolled; 67% male, 58% white and 39% black/African Americans. Median age and BMI were 55.0 years and 29.5 kg/m2, respectively. For both cefepime and taniborbactam, exposures increased, and CL decreased with increasing renal impairment (see Table). The hemodialysis extraction ratio was 49.7% and 47.4% for taniborbactam and cefepime respectively. No safety signals were observed and there were no serious adverse events. Table Conclusion Cefepime and taniborbactam CL is similarly reduced with varying degrees of renal impairment. Dialysis removes a high fraction of both drugs. Dose adjustments recommended for cefepime are appropriate for taniborbactam. Disclosures Brooke Geibel, BS, Venatorx Pharmaceuticals (Employee, Shareholder) James A. Dowell, PhD, Venatorx Pharmaceuticals (Independent Contractor) Thomas C. Marbury, MD, Venatorx Pharmaceuticals (Independent Contractor) William Smith, MD, Venatorx Pharmaceuticals (Independent Contractor) Paul C. McGovern, MD, Venatorx Pharmaceuticals (Employee) Cynthia Richards, MD, Venatorx Pharmaceuticals (Independent Contractor) Tim Henkel, MD, PhD, Venatorx Pharmaceuticals (Employee, Shareholder)

Gepotidacin is a novel triazaacenaphthylene bacterial topoisomerase inhibitor. In this phase 1, nonrandomized, open‐label, parallel‐group, multicenter, multipart study, the pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability of a single intravenous (IV) dose of gepotidacin 750 mg over 2 hours were evaluated in subjects with normal renal function, in those with moderate and severe renal impairment, and in end‐stage renal disease (ESRD) on and not on dialysis. Administration of IV gepotidacin 750 mg was safe and generally tolerated in the study subjects. Dosing in severe renal impairment with and without hemodialysis resulted in significant increases in plasma drug levels and decreases in clearance. The geometric mean elimination half‐life (t½) was minimally impacted (range 9.45 to 11.5 hours) in all the renal‐impairment groups relative to normal renal function. Regardless of renal function, urine gepotidacin concentrations remained considerably high over a 12‐hour period. Saliva concentrations displayed a linear relationship with plasma concentrations. The t½ in saliva was not impacted in the moderate‐impairment and ESRD subjects and was comparable to t½ in plasma. Over a 4‐hour dialysis, approximately 6% of the gepotidacin dose was removed. Overall, subjects with severe renal impairment and ESRD with and without hemodialysis may require adjustment in dose or dosing frequency.

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is an independent risk factor for developing chronic renal impairment and end-stage renal disease. Limited treatment options are available for HCV genotype 2, 3, 5, and 6 infections in patients with an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of 2 . In dialysis-dependent subjects, glecaprevir and pibrentasvir exposures were similar (≤18% difference) when study drugs were administered before hemodialysis or on a nondialysis day. Adverse events were mostly mild, with the most common being self-limited fatigue (3 subjects). The study findings support the clinical evaluation of glecaprevir-pibrentasvir without dose adjustment in HCV-infected subjects with renal impairment. (This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under registration number NCT02442258.)

Background Patients with chronic liver disease (CLD) have impaired immune function, are prone to community-acquired bacterial pneumonia (CABP), and experience greater morbidity/mortality and healthcare costs than CABP patients without CLD. LEF, a novel pleuromutilin antibiotic (IV/oral) with primary liver elimination, was generally well tolerated and noninferior to moxifloxacin in two phase 3 studies of adults with CABP. We investigated the PK and safety of LEF and its main metabolite, BC-8041, in subjects with hepatic impairment. Methods In this open-label study, subjects were allocated to 1 of 3 groups based on hepatic function level; Moderate (Child-Pugh score 7–9) or Severe subjects (Child-Pugh score ≥10) were matched (gender, age, and weight) to subjects in the Normal group (normal hepatic function, no liver cirrhosis). Subjects received a single 1-hour 150 mg LEF infusion. Blood and urine samples were collected predose and over a 48-hour period postdose for PK analysis; plasma and urine were assayed for LEF and BC-8041 using validated assays. Safety assessments included treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), labs, vital signs, and electrocardiograms. Results 27 subjects enrolled in and completed the study (n = 11, Normal; n = 8, Moderate; n = 8, Severe). Mean LEF and BC-8041 plasma concentration profiles were comparable across all hepatic function groups through the first 12 hours following the start of infusion. Subjects with hepatic impairment had slightly slower rates of elimination in the later elimination phases. LEF and BC-8041 exposures were similar across all hepatic function groups (table), and the majority of LEF and BC-8041 were excreted nonrenally. TEAEs were reported in 2 (18.2%) subjects in the Normal group, 2 (25%) in the Moderate group, and 1 (12.5%) in the Severe group. None of the TEAEs were serious or led to study drug discontinuation. No subject met Hy’s law criteria. Within 4 hours postdose, the maximum mean change from baseline in the QTcF interval was 12.4, 19.2, and 14.1 msec in the Normal, Moderate, and Severe groups, respectively. Conclusion No dosage adjustment for LEF appears to be required when treating subjects with hepatic impairment. LEF was generally well tolerated in all subjects regardless of hepatic functional status. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures

An open-label, parallel-group, single-dose study was conducted to assess the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and safety of apixaban in 8 subjects with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) on hemodialysis compared with 8 subjects with normal renal function. A single oral 5-mg dose of apixaban was administered once to healthy subjects and twice to subjects with ESRD, separated by ≥7 days: 2 hours before (on hemodialysis) and immediately after a 4-hour hemodialysis session (off hemodialysis). Blood samples were collected for determination of apixaban pharmacokinetic parameters, measures of clotting (prothrombin time, international normalized ratio, activated partial thromboplastin time), and anti-factor Xa (FXa) activity. Compared with healthy subjects, apixaban Cmax and AUCinf were 10% lower and 36% higher, respectively, in subjects with ESRD off hemodialysis. Hemodialysis in subjects with ESRD was associated with reductions in apixaban Cmax and AUCinf of 13% and 14%, respectively. The percent change from baseline in clotting measures was similar in healthy subjects and subjects with ESRD, and differences in anti-FXa activity were similar to differences in apixaban concentration. A single 5-mg oral dose of apixaban was well tolerated in both groups. In conclusion, ESRD resulted in a modest increase (36%) in apixaban AUC and no increase in Cmax , and hemodialysis had a limited impact on apixaban clearance.

Background & Aims Paritaprevir, ombitasvir, and dasabuvir are direct-acting antivirals for treatment of chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. The aim of this study was to characterize the effects of mild, moderate, and severe hepatic impairment on the pharmacokinetics of these drugs. Methods HCV-negative subjects with normal hepatic function (n=7) or mild (Child-Pugh A, n=6), moderate (Child-Pugh B, n=6), or severe (Child-Pugh C, n=5) hepatic impairment received a single-dose of the combination of paritaprevir plus ritonavir (paritaprevir/r, 200/100mg), ombitasvir (25mg), and dasabuvir (400mg). Plasma samples were collected through 144hours after administration for pharmacokinetic assessments. Results Paritaprevir, ombitasvir, dasabuvir, and ritonavir exposures (maximal plasma concentration, C max , and area under the concentration-time curve, AUC) were minimally affected in subjects with mild or moderate hepatic impairment. Differences in exposures between healthy controls and subjects with mild or moderate hepatic impairment were less than 35%, except for 62% higher paritaprevir AUC in subjects with moderate hepatic impairment. Paritaprevir and dasabuvir AUC were significantly higher in subjects with severe hepatic impairment (950% and 325%, respectively). However, ombitasvir AUC was 54% lower and ritonavir AUC was comparable. Adverse events included eye stye, insomnia, and pain from an infiltrated intravenous line. Conclusions The changes observed in paritaprevir, ritonavir, ombitasvir, and dasabuvir exposures in subjects with mild or moderate hepatic impairment do not necessitate dose adjustment. Subjects with severe hepatic impairment had substantially higher paritaprevir and dasabuvir exposures.

A proof-of-concept phase I clinical trial demonstrates that targeting interleukin (IL)-23 with an antibody that binds to the p19 subunit leads to clinical improvement of disease in patients with moderate to severe psoriasis. Sauzanne Khalilieh and colleagues report a proof-of-concept phase I clinical trial which demonstrates that targeting the pro-inflammatory cytokine interleukin-23 (IL-23) with tildrakizumab, an antibody that binds to the p19 subunit of IL-23, leads to symptomatic improvement of disease in patients with moderate to severe psoriasis. The antibody is well tolerated, suggesting that selective targeting of IL-23 merits further study. Psoriasis is a chronic inflammatory skin disorder that affects approximately 2–3% of the population worldwide and has severe effects on patients’ physical and psychological well-being1,2,3. The discovery that psoriasis is an immune-mediated disease has led to more targeted, effective therapies; recent advances have focused on the interleukin (IL)-12/23p40 subunit shared by IL-12 and IL-23. Evidence suggests that specific inhibition of IL-23 would result in improvement in psoriasis. Here we evaluate tildrakizumab, a monoclonal antibody that targets the IL-23p19 subunit, in a three-part, randomized, placebo-controlled, sequential, rising multiple-dose phase I study in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis to provide clinical proof that specific targeting of IL-23p19 results in symptomatic improvement of disease severity in human subjects. A 75% reduction in the psoriasis area and severity index (PASI) score (PASI75) was achieved by all subjects in parts 1 and 3 (pooled) in the 3 and 10 mg kg−1 groups by day 196. In part 2, 10 out of 15 subjects in the 3 mg kg−1 group and 13 out of 14 subjects in the 10 mg kg−1 group achieved a PASI75 by day 112. Tildrakizumab demonstrated important clinical improvement in moderate-to-severe psoriasis patients as demonstrated by improvements in PASI scores and histological samples.

Doravirine is a novel nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor in development for use with other antiretroviral therapies to treat human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infection. Doravirine metabolism predominantly occurs via cytochrome P450 3A with

Grazoprevir (GZR) plus elbasvir is an approved treatment for chronic infection with hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 1 or 4. HCV infection complications include liver cirrhosis, end-stage liver disease, and hepatocellular carcinoma. The objective of this study was to evaluate the pharmacokinetics and safety of multiple-dose GZR (200, 100, or 50 mg) in non-HCV participants with mild, moderate, or severe hepatic impairment (HI), respectively, and in healthy matched controls (protocol MK-5172_p013; Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ). Participants with mild, moderate, or severe HI and controls (aged 18 to 65 years) matched for race, age, sex, and body mass index were enrolled in a 3-part, open-label, sequential-panel pharmacokinetic study. Participants received oral doses of GZR 200 mg (two 100-mg tablets), 100 mg (one 100-mg tablet), or 50 mg (two 25-mg tablets) once daily for 10 days. A total of 50 participants were enrolled: 8 with mild HI, 9 with moderate HI, 8 with severe HI, and a corresponding number of healthy matched controls for each hepatic cohort. Participants with HI demonstrated higher GZR exposure than healthy matched controls and showed an increase in exposure with increasing HI severity. The steady-state GZR AUC 0–24 (area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to 24 h) for participants with mild, moderate, or severe HI was ≈2-, ≈5-, or ≈12-fold higher, respectively, than that for healthy matched controls. GZR was generally well tolerated in participants with HI. No dose adjustment is required for GZR in people with HCV with mild HI. GZR is contraindicated for those with moderate or severe HI (Child-Pugh class B or C), since they may have significantly increased GZR exposures that may lead to an increased risk of transaminase elevation.

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) complicates warfarin anticoagulation partially through its effect on CYP2C9 activity. Tecarfarin, a novel vitamin K antagonist, is not metabolized by CYP2C9. To evaluate the effect of CKD on their metabolism, we measured PK parameters of warfarin and tecarfarin in subjects with and without CKD. CKD subjects with estimated glomerular filtration rate

AIMS Sugammadex rapidly reverses moderate and deep rocuronium- or vecuronium-induced neuromuscular blockade at doses of 4 mg/kg and 2 mg/kg, respectively. Sugammadex is renally eliminated. This study evaluated the pharmacokinetics of sugammadex in subjects with renal impairment versus those with normal renal function. METHODS This open-label, two-part, phase 1 study included adults with moderate (creatinine clearance (CLcr) 30

Background GS-9620 is a potent oral agonist of toll-like receptor 7, a key modulator of the innate immune response. In healthy volunteers, low doses of GS-9620 (2, 4 and 6 mg) induced significant expression of peripheral interferon-stimulated-gene (ISG) mRNA in the absence of detectable serum interferon-α and systemic adverse events (AEs). We evaluated the safety, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of GS-9620 in treatment-naive patients chronically infected with HCV genotype 1. Methods In this double-blind, placebo-controlled study, 51 patients were randomized 5:1 (active:placebo) to receive either a single dose or two once-weekly doses of GS-9620 at four dose levels (0.3, 1, 2 and 4 mg) or placebo. Pharmacodynamic assessments included peripheral ISG15 mRNA expression, serum interferon-α and interferon-γ-inducible protein (IP)-10 levels and HCV RNA quantification. Results GS-9620 was well-tolerated at all doses. Most AEs were mild or moderate in severity. GS-9620 exhibited dose-linear pharmacokinetics with a median half-life in plasma of 18 h. Transient, dose-dependent ISG15 induction was observed at 1, 2 and 4 mg, with peak mean fold change within 48 h followed by a decline to baseline levels within 7 days of dosing. Serum interferon-α induction post-baseline was detected in 16.7% (8/48) of patients. No clinically significant reductions in HCV RNA were observed. Conclusions GS-9620 was safe, well-tolerated and biologically active in patients with HCV infection. Induction of ISG15 occurred in the absence of detectable serum interferon-α or systemic AEs in most patients, supporting a pre-systemic mechanism of action. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01591668.

This phase I, open-label, single-dose study evaluated the pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability of renally excreted drug dexpramipexole in subjects with normal and impaired renal function, i.e. mild, moderate, severe renal impairment, or end-stage renal disease (ESRD) requiring hemodialysis when matched by age and sex. Dexpramipexole area under the curves (AUCs), but not Cmax , were significantly increased with the severity of renal impairment after a single dose administration. The geometric mean ratio of dose-normalized AUC(0-72) was 1.4, 1.7, 2.7, and 4.5, respectively, in mild, moderate, severe renal impairment, and ESRD subjects when compared to healthy subjects. There was a strong association between renal function (eGFR) and dexpramipexole CLr. The slope (90% confidence interval(CI)) of eGFR and renal clearance (CLr) in the regression model was 3.1 (2.4, 3.7). Dexpramipexole elimination in ESRD subjects during both dialysis and non-dialysis (i.e., interval between dialysis) was insignificant. Single 75 mg and 150 mg doses of dexpramipexole were well tolerated, and the safety profile was comparable across renal function groups. Extensive drug accumulation may occur with repeated dosing in patients with significant renal impairment. It is recommended that dexpramipexole not to be given to patients with severe renal impairment or in those with ESRD.

Aims To evaluate the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics after a single dose of liposomal mifamurtide (liposomal muramyl tripeptide phospatidyl ethanolamine; MEPACT®) in adult subjects with mild (Child-Pugh Class A) or moderate (Child-Pugh Class B) hepatic impairment in comparison with age-, weight- and sex-matched healthy subjects with normal hepatic function. Methods Subjects received a 4 mg dose of liposomal mifamurtide via 1 h intravenous infusion. Blood samples were collected over 72 h for pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic assessments (changes in serum interleukin-6, tumour necrosis factor-α and C-reactive protein). Results Thirty-seven subjects were enrolled: nine with mild hepatic impairment, eight with moderate hepatic impairment and 20 matched healthy subjects. Geometric least-square mean ratios of total mifamurtide AUCinf for the mild hepatic impairment and moderate hepatic impairment groups vs. matched healthy subjects were 105% (90% confidence interval, 83.6–132%) and 119% (90% confidence interval, 94.1–151%), respectively, which are below the protocol-specified threshold (150%) to require development of dose-modification recommendations. Pharmacodynamic parameters for changes in serum interleukin-6 and tumour necrosis factor-α concentrations were generally similar across hepatic function groups. Mifamurtide-induced increases in serum C-reactive protein were attenuated in the moderate hepatic impairment group, consistent with the liver being the major organ of C-reactive protein synthesis. No grade ≥3 adverse events were seen in subjects administered mifamurtide (4 mg). Conclusions These results support the conclusion that mild or moderate hepatic impairment does not produce clinically meaningful effects on the clinical pharmacokinetics or pharmacodynamics of mifamurtide; no dose modifications are needed in these special patient populations based on clinical pharmacological considerations.