1. Risk factors for the development of cutaneous melanoma after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation.
- Author
-
Herr MM, Curtis RE, Tucker MA, Tecca HR, Engels EA, Cahoon EK, Battiwalla M, Buchbinder D, Flowers ME, Brazauskas R, Shaw BE, and Morton LM
- Subjects
- Adolescent, Adult, Age Factors, Aged, Busulfan adverse effects, Case-Control Studies, Child, Child, Preschool, Female, Graft vs Host Disease etiology, Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation statistics & numerical data, Humans, Infant, Karnofsky Performance Status statistics & numerical data, Male, Melanoma diagnosis, Melanoma etiology, Melanoma pathology, Melphalan adverse effects, Middle Aged, Neoplasm Staging, Risk Factors, Skin drug effects, Skin pathology, Skin radiation effects, Skin Neoplasms diagnosis, Skin Neoplasms etiology, Skin Neoplasms pathology, Tissue Donors statistics & numerical data, Transplantation Conditioning methods, Ultraviolet Rays adverse effects, Vidarabine adverse effects, Vidarabine analogs & derivatives, Whole-Body Irradiation adverse effects, Young Adult, Graft vs Host Disease epidemiology, Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation adverse effects, Melanoma epidemiology, Skin Neoplasms epidemiology, Transplantation Conditioning adverse effects
- Abstract
Background: Melanoma risk is increased after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT), but specific risk factors are unknown., Objective: Investigate risk factors for melanoma after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation., Methods: We conducted a nested case-control study of 140 melanoma cases and 557 controls (matched by age at HCT, sex, primary disease, survival time) through the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research., Results: Melanoma risk was significantly increased among HCT survivors who received total body irradiation-based myeloablative conditioning (multivariable adjusted odds ratio [OR] = 1.77; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.00-3.15) or reduced-intensity conditioning containing melphalan (OR = 2.60; 95% CI = 1.13-6.02) or fludarabine (OR = 2.72; 95% CI = 1.02-7.30) versus busulfan-based myeloablative regimens; were diagnosed with acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) with stage 2+ skin involvement (OR = 1.92; 95% CI = 1.19-3.10), chronic GvHD without skin involvement (OR = 1.91; 95% CI = 1.03-3.57), or keratinocytic carcinoma (OR = 2.37; 95% CI = 1.16-4.83); and resided in areas with higher ambient ultraviolet radiation (ORtertile3 = 1.64; 95% CI = 1.01-2.67)., Limitations: Data on individual-level ultraviolet radiation exposure and clinical data on melanoma characteristics were lacking. Additionally, misclassification of melanoma is possible as not all pathology reports were available for review., Conclusion: These results emphasize the importance of adherence to current surveillance guidelines (routine skin examination, photoprotection recommendations), particularly for HCT survivors at highest risk., (Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier Inc.)
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF