Search

In the 1970s, during and right after the end of the Vietnam War, more works by Filipino writers, especially historians, were translated into Japanese than works by any other Southeast Asians. In Southeast Asia, it was in the Philippines that the Japanese and the American forces had fought their fiercest battles during the Second World War. The Japanese translators who translated prominent Filipino nationalist historians such as Gregorio Zaide, Teodoro Agoncillo and Renato Constantino, had personally experienced war, defeat, and postwar life under the US-led Allied occupation of Japan. This article compares the original texts of some of these key Filipino works and their Japanese translations, and examines the ‘noises’ produced in the process of translation. This noise includes strategies such as the deletion and addition of information, opinions, and deliberate misreadings. This article suggests that these strategies reveal the translators’ views on the past as well as their contemporary experience of postwar Japan against the background of the ongoing Vietnam War.

This article examines the formation of Japanese knowledge on the Philippines during the Second World War, which spawned numerous Japanese writings on the Philippines that ranged from governmentalmilitary reports to fictional literature. Previous works criticized or simply dismissed these writings as products of a “wrong” history of Japan during its imperial era. Private Japanese wartime accounts were seen as “ethnocentric,” “self-deceiving,” and “violent.” This article sheds light on these so-called “bad” Japanese accounts by tracing their roots in American colonial writings. It demonstrates how Japanese Asiatic and solidarity discourse with the Philippines was informed by the US discourse on benevolent assimilation. KEYWORDS: SECOND WORLD WAR • JAPANESE SOLIDARITY DISCOURSE • USES OF HISTORY • US COLONIALISM • KI KIMURA