Search

There has been a decline in living kidney donation over the last two decades. Donors from low-income families or racial/ethnic minorities face greater disproportionate geographic, financial, and logistical barriers to completing lengthy and complex evaluations. This has contributed to the decreased proportion of these subgroups. The authors view telemedicine as a potential solution to this problem.Since the initial decline of donors in 2005, biologically related donors have experienced a lack of growth across race/ethnicity. Conversely, unrelated donors have emerged as the majority of donors in recent years across race/ethnicity, except for unrelated black donors. Disparities in access to living kidney donation persist. Telemedicine using live-video visits can overcome barriers to access transplant centers and facilitate care coordination. In a U.S. survey, nephrologists, surgeons, coordinators, social workers, and psychologists/psychologists across transplant centers are favorably disposed to use telemedicine for donor evaluation/follow-up beyond the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. However, with the waning of relaxed telemedicine regulations under the Public Health Emergency, providers perceive payor policy and out-of-state licensing as major factors hindering telemedicine growth prospects.Permanent federal and state policies that support telemedicine services for living kidney donation can enhance access to transplant centers and help overcome barriers to donor evaluation.

Older kidney transplant recipients demonstrate increased rates of infection, and lower rates of rejection, compared with younger kidney transplant recipients. However, the mechanism behind this observation remains unknown. To develop a multifaceted view of age-associated immune dysfunction, we determined the function and phenotype of T cells predisposing to vulnerability to infection on a molecular level. Overlapping peptide pools representing the dominant CMV antigens were used to stimulate PBMC collected from 51 kidney transplant recipients, using cytokine secretion to determine specificity and intensity of response. Staphylococcal endotoxin B (SEB) was analyzed in parallel. To define immune cell subsets, we used single cell RNA sequencing (scRNAseq) to evaluate cellular surface markers and gene expression. We found increased frequency of SEB- and CMV-specific T cells was associated with freedom from infection, especially in older patients. Spatialized t-SNE analysis revealed decreased frequency of naïve T cells, increased frequency of TEMRA cells, and decreased frequency of IFNγ secreting T cells in patients with infection. Application of scRNAseq analysis revealed increased frequency of terminally differentiated T cells expressing NK-associated receptors and inhibitory markers. These findings offer unique insight into the mechanism behind vulnerability to infection in the kidney transplant recipient, revealing a specific T cell subtype of impaired antigen response and terminal effector phenotype as markers of T cell senescence.

Personalization of maintenance immunosuppression in kidney transplant recipients has long remained a goal in the transplant community. The recent addition of donor-derived cell-free DNA assays to detect allograft rejection and monitor allograft health may permit for reductions in maintenance immunosuppression in recipients with stable levels. Herein, we described 5 patients with stable donor-derived cell-free DNA levels who underwent reduction in maintenance immunosuppression without precipitation of clinical rejection, proteinuria, or de novo donor specific antibody formation.

White kidney transplant candidates have the highest pre-transplant mortality rate compared to other ethnicities. The reason for a higher mortality rate is not well-understood. Estimated post-transplant survival (EPTS) score has been used to predict patient survival after transplant and may be associated with pre-transplant survival. First-time kidney transplant candidates listed between 2015 and 2018 were identified from the Organ Procurement Transplantation Network database. Individuals listed for multiple organs, at multiple centers, and age

Obesity in deceased kidney donors is a known risk factor for poor allograft outcomes. The Kidney Donor Profile Index (KDPI) has been introduced to predict graft survival in deceased donor kidney transplantation (DDKT). Obesity, however, is not included in KDPI. We study the impact of donor obesity on DDKT outcomes after adjusting for organ quality by KDPI. The Organ Procurement Transplantation Network/United Network for Organ Sharing (OPTN/UNOS) data of DDKT from 2005 to 2017, with donor BMI ≥ 18.5 kg/m2 and weight >80 kg were included. There was a total of 66 382 DDKTs with 10 917 death-censored graft failures. For KDPI ≤ 30%, the 10-year death-censored graft survival (DCGS) rates among donor BMI 30%, 10-year DCGS rates were 67.5%, 66.1%, 65.9%, 62.6% and 63.2%, respectively. After adjusting for known confounding factors including KDPI, donor obesity was not independently associated with an increased risk for graft failure. In DDKT with donor weight >80 kg, donor obesity was not associated with a lower long term DCGS compared to non-obesity when KDPI ≤ 30%.

Purpose We reviewed the clinical experience of kidney transplant recipients diagnosed with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection in order to understand the impact of the current coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic infection on transplant recipients. Given that early reports from heavily affected areas demonstrated a very high mortality rate amongst kidney transplant recipients, ranging between 30% and 40%, we sought to evaluate outcomes at a center with a high burden of cases but not experiencing acute crisis due to COVID-19. Procedures In this single center retrospective observational study, medical records of all kidney transplant recipients at the UCLA Medical Center were reviewed for a diagnosis of COVID-19 by polymerase chain reaction, followed by chart review to determine kidney transplant characteristics and clinical course. Main findings A total of 41 kidney transplant recipients were identified with COVID-19 positive polymerase chain reaction. Recipients had been transplanted for a median of 47 months before diagnosis. The large proportion of infected individuals were minorities (Hispanic 65.9%, black 14.6%), on prednisone, tacrolimus, and mycophenolate mofetil (95.1%, 87.8%, and 87.8%, respectively), and had excellent allograft function (median 1.25 mg/dL). The most common presenting symptoms were fever, dyspnea, or cough. Most patients were hospitalized (63.4%); mortality was 9.8% and occurred only in patients in the intensive care unit. The most common treatment was reduction or removal of antimetabolite (77.8%). Approximately 26.9% presented with AKI. Conclusions COVID-19 infection in kidney transplant recipients results in a higher rate of hospitalization and mortality than in the general population. In an area with a high number of infections, the mortality rate was lower compared with earlier reports from areas experiencing early surge and strain on the medical system. Minorities were disproportionately affected. Future studies are needed to determine optimal approach to treatment and management of immunosuppression in kidney transplant recipients with COVID-19 infection.

Renal dysfunction in cirrhosis is common and is associated with increased mortality. Identifying and treating reversible causes of renal disease can significantly improve outcomes. The etiology, approach, and evaluation of renal disease in this group of patients is similar to the noncirrhosis patient, with a few specific caveats. Renal disease may be unrelated to the cause of cirrhosis (eg, prerenal acute kidney injury, acute tubular necrosis), occur as a manifestation of the same systemic disease responsible for the liver disease (eg, chronic viral hepatitis B and C infection) or as a consequence of cirrhosis (hepatorenal syndrome). Kidney impairment may be underrecognized in patients with cirrhosis due to over-reliance on creatinine-based glomerular filtration rate equations used in clinical practice. The first steps of evaluation for the renal disease include a thorough medical history to identify the underlying cause of cirrhosis and any potential trigger for renal dysfunction, physical examination, and review of prior laboratory records for baseline renal function. Renal imaging and urinalysis should be performed on all cirrhotic patients with renal dysfunction to establish the presence of urinary obstruction, chronicity and intrinsic renal disease.

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) causes mostly asymptomatic but lifelong infection. Primary infection or reactivation in immunocompromised individuals can be life-threatening. CMV viremia often occurs in solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients and associates with decreased graft survival and higher mortality. Furthering understanding of impaired immunity allowing CMV reactivation is critical to guiding anti-viral therapy and examining CMV's impact on outcomes of SOT. This study characterized longitudinal immune responses to CMV in 31 kidney transplant recipients with CMV viremia and matched, non-viremic recipients. Subjects were sampled three- and twelve-months post-transplant, with additional samples one-week and one-month post-viremia. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) were stained for NK and T cell markers. PBMC transcriptomes were characterized by RNA-Seq. Plasma proteins were quantified by Luminex. CD8 T cell transcriptomes were characterized by single-cell RNA-Seq. Pre-viremia, patients had high levels of IL-15 with concurrent expansion of immature CD56bright NK cells. Post-viremia, mature CD56dim NK cells and CD28- CD8 T cells upregulating inhibitory and NK-associated receptors were expanded. Phenotype of NK cells and CD28- CD8 T cells were associated with control of viremia. These findings suggest signatures of innate activation may be prognostic for CMV reactivation post-transplant, while CD8 T cell functionality is critical for effective control of CMV.

Rationale & Objective Posttransplant diabetes mellitus (DM) after kidney transplantation increases morbidity and mortality, particularly in older and obese recipients. We aimed to examine the impact of immunosuppression selection on the risk of posttransplant DM among both older and obese kidney transplant recipients. Study Design Retrospective database study. Setting & Participants Kidney-only transplant recipients aged ≥18 years from 2005 to 2016 in the United States from US Renal Data System records, which integrate Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network/United Network for Organ Sharing records with Medicare billing claims. Exposures Various immunosuppression regimens in the first 3 months after transplant. Outcomes Development of DM >3 months-to-1 year posttransplant. Analytical Approach We used multivariable Cox regression to compare the incidence of posttransplant DM by immunosuppression regimen with the reference regimen of thymoglobulin (TMG) or alemtuzumab (ALEM) with tacrolimus + mycophenolic acid + prednisone using inverse propensity weighting. Results 12.7% of kidney transplant recipients developed posttransplant DM with higher incidences in older (≥55 years vs, Graphical abstract

In 2017, United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) established the safety net policy with set criteria for offering kidney transplantation (KT) for patients who developed end-stage renal disease between 60 and 365 days after liver transplant (LT). We provide an update on the impact of the policy. We analyzed UNOS data of liver recipients transplanted between 1987 and 2020 who developed acute kidney injury requiring dialysis within 60 days before or after LT and subsequently listed for KT. We identified 407 patients who were listed for kidney after LT before policy and 248 patients after policy. Median waiting time to KT was shorter after policy (324 days vs. 2827 days). There was a higher proportion of candidates who were listed for subsequent KT within 1-year after policy (94.8% vs. 63.6%). KT rate was also higher after policy (87.7 vs. 30.7 per 100 patient-years at risk). Most importantly, we started to observe a net negative kidney utilization in end-stage liver disease setting (i.e., summation of simultaneous liver kidney and kidney after liver transplant in the first-year after LT has decreased from 1086 to 876 transplants in 2019). Such findings are consistent with a more efficient system and more appropriate allocation of organs.

Introduction One of the most commonly used immunosuppressants in organ transplant, tacrolimus exhibits wide interpatient and intrapatient variability and narrow therapeutic index that necessitates routine concentration monitoring and dosage adjustments. Availability of prolonged-release tacrolimus capsules (PR-TAC) and extended-release tacrolimus tablets (LCP-TAC) offer once-daily dosing options. The objective of this review is to highlight and compare available pharmacokinetic (PK) data of LCP-TAC to immediate-release tacrolimus (IR-TAC) in kidney transplant recipients. Areas covered A review of the literature was performed using PubMed and Embase search to identify relevant articles evaluating PK data for LCP-TAC compared to IR-TAC in kidney transplant patients including special populations. Expert opinion LCP-TAC's unique PK profile may be more favorable than IR-TAC. While the clinical impact of these PK differences have not been established, several outcomes are being evaluated in ongoing studies. Results of these studies will add information incrementally to care for kidney transplant patients. Larger prospective studies evaluating kidney and patient survival differences are needed but it is unlikely that they will be conducted. Given that the patent exclusivity of LCP-TAC for the next several years and imminent loss of exclusivity of PR-TAC, our opinion is the use of LCP-TAC will be increasing, especially in Europe.

A small pediatric deceased donor (SPD) weight cutoff whether to transplant as en bloc (EB) or single pediatric (SP) kidney is uncertain. Using UNOS/OPTN data (2000-2019), 27 875 SPDs were divided by (i) EB (11.4%) or SP (88.6%) and (ii) donor weight [≤10 (5.4%),10-15 (8.3%),15-18 (3.7%),18-20 (2.9%), and20 kg (79.7%)]. SP20 kg and adult deceased donors (grouped by Kidney Donor Profile Index, KDPI,30, 30-85, and85) were used as references. The primary outcome was 10-year graft failure. In SP10 kg, the hazard ratio (HR) for overall graft failure was 1.64 (1.38-2.20) compared with EB10 kg, and 1.45 (1.18-1.80) compared with SP20 kg. In SP10-15 kg, HR was 1.31 (1.12-1.54) compared with EB10-15 kg, and 1.04 (0.91-1.18) compared with SP20 kg. In SP15 kg, the risk was the same as SP20 kg. Ten-year overall graft survival of SP 12 kg was comparable to SP20 kg (62% vs. 57%). Ten-year death censored graft failure of SP10-15 kg (70%) and SP15-18 kg (70%) was like the adult donors with KDPI 30-85 (67%). In conclusion, we recommend single kidney transplants from SPDs with weight12 kg to adult recipients in centers with experience in SPD transplants to optimize organ utilization.

BACKGROUND: Despite advances in immune suppression, kidney allograft rejection and other injuries remain a significant clinical concern, particularly with regards to long-term allograft survival. Evaluation of immune activity can provide information about rejection status and help guide interventions to extend allograft life. Here, we describe the validation of a blood gene expression classifier developed to differentiate immune quiescence from both T cell–mediated rejection (TCMR) and antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR). METHODS: A five-gene classifier (DCAF12, MARCH8, FLT3, IL1R2, and PDCD1) was developed on 56 peripheral blood samples and validated on two sample sets independent of the training cohort. The primary validation set comprised 98 quiescence samples and 18 rejection samples: seven TCMR, ten ABMR, and one mixed rejection. The second validation set included eight quiescence and 11 rejection samples: seven TCMR, two ABMR, and two mixed rejection. AlloSure donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) was also evaluated. RESULTS: AlloMap Kidney classifier scores in the primary validation set differed significantly between quiescence (median, 9.49; IQR, 7.68–11.53) and rejection (median, 13.09; IQR, 11.25–15.28), with P

Fungus account for ∼ 5% of all cases infections following solid organ transplant. Fungal infections in the setting of immunosuppression may progress rapidly and present in an atypical pattern. Herein we describe 4 cases of environmental fungal infections acquired decades prior to transplant that developed into localized atypical cutaneous masses following kidney transplant.

On August 10, 2017, a formal policy was enacted in the United States that defined listing criteria for simultaneous liver-kidney transplantation and priority for patients who received a liver transplantation (LT) and subsequently developed significant kidney disease after LT. This article reviews and summarizes the rationale for such policies, the policies themselves, and the potential impact on LT candidates.

Background Older kidney patients with chronic kidney disease benefit significantly from kidney transplantation. However, these older transplant recipients have greater mortality after transplantation than younger transplant recipients. Understanding the impact of comorbidities on post-transplant mortality can improve risk stratification and patient selection. Methods A single-center analysis of 3105 kidney transplant recipients was performed over a 12-year period. Comorbidities associated with death were evaluated in older and younger transplant recipients. Results The 2 most important factors associated with increased mortality in the first 100 days after transplant were recipient age ≥60 and receipt of deceased donor organs (adjusted odds ratios, 3.29 and 5.80, respectively), with no statistically significant impact of recipient comorbidities. In the later post-transplant period (after the first 100 days), recipient age ≥60 and receipt of deceased donor organs (adjusted hazard ratios [HR] of 2.14 and 2.29, respectively) remained predictors of mortality. We also found that donor age ≥60 and the recipient having cardiovascular disease and diabetes were independent predictors of increased mortality. There was a statistically significant interaction between diabetes and heart disease and recipient age ≥60, with a lesser impact on late mortality in older patients compared to younger patients. Conclusions This analysis suggests that comorbidities have a larger impact later after transplantation, with less effect on older recipients. These observations suggest that certain comorbid conditions should be evaluated differently in older patients compared to younger ones.

Beyond its widely recognized morbidity and mortality, coronavirus disease 2019 poses an additional health risk to renal allograft recipients. Detection and measurement of donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA), expressed as a fraction of the total cell-free DNA (cfDNA), has emerged as a noninvasive biomarker for allograft rejection. Here, we present a case report of a patient who was infected with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2, 11 mo post-kidney transplant. The patient was serially monitored using an analytically and clinically validated massively multiplex PCR-based dd-cfDNA assay to assess allograft injury and risk for rejection. Over the course of infection, low dd-cfDNA fractions were observed (below the 1% cutoff) and were accompanied by unusually highly elevated levels of total cfDNA, which gradually declined as the infection resolved. The case study highlights the variability in total cfDNA levels during and after viral infection, and the need to consider both total and dd-cfDNA levels when clinically interpreting the results for allograft rejection. Furthermore, the study highlights the importance of serial testing, wherein an interplay between total cfDNA and dd-cfDNA can inform the optimization of a patient's immunosuppressive treatment regimen in response to infection.

After kidney transplantation, infection and death are important clinical complications, especially for the growing numbers of older patients with limited resilience to withstand adverse events. Evaluation of changes in gene expression in immune cells can reveal the underlying mechanisms behind vulnerability to infection. A cohort of 60 kidney transplant recipients was evaluated. Gene expression in peripheral blood mononuclear cells 3months after kidney transplantation was analyzed to compare differences between patients with infection and those who were infection-free in the first-year post-transplant. Pro-inflammatory genes such as IL1B, CCL4, and TNF were found to be downregulated in post-transplant PBMC from patients who developed infection. In contrast, genes involved in metabolism, HLA genes, and transcripts involved in type I interferon innate antiviral responses were found to be upregulated. Promoter-based bioinformatic analyses implicated increased activity of interferon regulatory factors, erythroid nuclear factor (E2), and CCAAT-enhancer-binding protein (C/EBP) in patients who developed infections. Differential patterns of gene expression were observed in patients who developed infection after kidney transplantation, with patterns distinct from changes associated with patient age, suggesting possible mechanisms behind vulnerability to infection. Assessment of gene expression in blood may offer an approach for patient risk stratification and monitoring after transplantation.

BACKGROUND The pharmacokinetics and metabolism of tacrolimus, an immunosuppressant commonly used to prevent transplant rejection, can differ in specific subpopulations. This analysis examined treatment outcomes and safety of immediate-release tacrolimus (IR-Tac) and LCP-tacrolimus (LCPT) in stable Hispanic kidney transplant recipients. MATERIAL AND METHODS This was a post hoc analysis of clinical trial data from Hispanic adult stable kidney transplant recipients randomized to remain on IR-Tac or convert from IR-Tac to a reduced dose of LCPT (NCT00817206). Composite treatment failure was evaluated at 12 months. Estimated glomerular filtration rate and tacrolimus trough concentrations were evaluated over 12 months. RESULTS Fifty-five stable (LCPT n=26, IR-Tac n=29) kidney transplant recipients who self-identified as Hispanic or Latino were included in this analysis. Composite treatment failure occurred in 1 patient (4%) who converted to LCPT and 1 (3%) who remained on IR-Tac. The estimated glomerular filtration rate was stable over time and similar in the 2 treatment groups (P=0.08). Tacrolimus trough levels for both groups were similar over time in the 2 treatment groups (P=0.98). Treatment-emergent adverse events were similar in patients who converted to LCPT and in those who remained on IR-Tac. CONCLUSIONS Efficacy and safety were similar in Hispanic kidney transplant recipients who converted from IR-Tac to LCPT and in those remaining on IR-Tac.

BackgroundCytomegalovirus (CMV) infection continues to negatively affect outcomes for solid organ transplant recipients, despite the advent of strategies for preemptive surveillance and prophylaxis. The impact is especially great for CMV seronegative recipients of donor seropositive organs, who typically lack the ability to control CMV infection at the time of transplantation.MethodsWe reviewed episodes of CMV DNAemia in a modern cohort of kidney transplant recipients over a 3-year period at a high-volume transplant center to investigate the frequency of DNAemia during antiviral prophylaxis.ResultsDespite receipt of antiviral prophylaxis per current guidelines, 75 cases of CMV DNAemia were observed in the first 100days after transplantation. For high risk patients, median time to DNAemia was 75days after transplantation, and the majority of patients had experienced dose-reduction of valganciclovir due to renal insufficiency. Review of CMV seropositive intermediate risk patients demonstrated DNAemia occurring earlier after transplantation compared with high risk patients with a median time of 64days (P=.029). The impact of valganciclovir dose adjustment was less notable in the intermediate risk group.ConclusionsGuidelines recommend beginning routine surveillance for CMV after the completion of antiviral prophylaxis. Our findings suggest that closer monitoring may be beneficial, especially for high risk patients at risk for DNAemia. Patients requiring dose adjustment of valganciclovir due to renal insufficiency may be at increased risk for CMV DNAemia. Improved methods for CMV prophylaxis and evaluation of immunologic risk for CMV DNAemia and disease are needed to improve patient outcomes after kidney transplantation.

Background A previous phase 3 clinical trial in de novo adult kidney transplant recipients (NCT01187953) compared the efficacy and safety of once-daily LCP-tacrolimus (LCPT) and twice-daily immediate-release tacrolimus (IR-Tac). However, whether the rate of tacrolimus metabolism affects outcomes between LCPT and IR-Tac was not examined. Material/Methods Patients were initiated on 0.17 mg/kg/day LCPT or 0.1 mg/kg/day IR-Tac, with doses adjusted over time to maintain target therapeutic trough concentrations. This post hoc analysis examined dosing trends, relative efficacy, and safety of LCPT (n=247) and IR-Tac (n=249) in slow, intermediate, and rapid metabolizers as defined by concentration/dose ratios at day 30. Results For all metabolizer subgroups, minimum target tacrolimus trough concentrations were obtained more rapidly with LCPT than with IR-Tac. Slow metabolizers were more likely to exceed target trough concentrations with LCPT, while rapid metabolizers were more likely to fall below target trough concentrations with IR-Tac. Regardless of metabolizer status, significant differences were not detected between LCPT and IR-Tac for treatment failure, death, graft failure, biopsy-proven acute rejection, estimated glomerular filtration rate, or other clinical outcomes. Conclusions Although within metabolizer subgroups, attainment of target trough concentrations in the first week differed between LCPT and IR-Tac, these results suggest that, regardless of metabolizer phenotype, clinical outcomes do not differ between these formulations when dose adjustments are made. Clinical trial registration https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01187953

Background Under the current kidney allocation system, pediatric candidates listed prior to age 18 receive priority for high-quality deceased donor organs. This has resulted in a decline in living donor transplantation in pediatrics, despite superior outcomes of living donor transplantation. Due to a young age at transplantation, most pediatric kidney transplant recipients require re-transplantation. The effects of a previously failed deceased donor vs a previously failed living donor on re-transplant candidates are unknown. Methods Using the United Network for Organ Sharing database, we examined 2772 re-transplant recipients aged 18-30 years at time of relisting for second KT from 2000 to 2018 with history of prior pediatric KT (age ≤ 18 years). Results PFLDKT recipients compared to those with PFDDKT had shorter median waiting times and dialysis time regardless of their second donor type (14.0 vs 20.3 months, and 19.1 vs 34.5 months, respectively). PFLDKT recipients had higher re-transplant rates (adjusted HR 1.17, 95% CI 1.09-1.27, and adjusted HR 1.05, 95% CI 0.95-1.15 when calculating from time of relisting and time of returning to dialysis, respectively). PFDDKT recipients were more likely to have higher median PRA levels (90% vs 73%). Conclusions Re-transplant candidates who received a previous deceased donor as a child had a higher level of sensitization, longer waiting time, and dialysis exposure compared to those with PFLDKT. Among primary pediatric kidney transplant candidates, consideration should be considered for living donor transplantation, despite the priority for deceased donor organs, to avoid increased sensitization and longer waiting times for with re-transplantation.

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text., Background. Older kidney transplant recipients demonstrate increased rates of infection but decreased rates of rejection compared with younger recipients, suggesting that older transplant patients are functionally overimmunosuppressed. We hypothesized that this is a consequence of reduction in immunological activity due to biological aging and that an immune biological age, as determined by DNA methylation (DNAm), would be associated more strongly with incidence of infection than chronological age. Methods. DNAm analysis was performed on peripheral blood mononuclear cell collected from 60 kidney transplant recipients representing older (≥age 60 y) and younger (aged 30–59 y) patients 3 months after transplantation. DNAm age was calculated based on methylation status of a panel of CpG sites, which have been previously identified as indicative of biological age. Results. Correlation was seen between chronological and DNAm age; however, there were many patients with significant differences (either acceleration or slowing) between DNAm age and chronological age. A statistically significant association was seen between increased DNAm age and incidence of infection in the first year after kidney transplantation, whereas no significant association was seen between chronological age and infection. Conclusions. Assessment of DNAm age holds promise as an approach for patient evaluation and individualization of immune suppression regimens. This analysis may provide insights into the immunological mechanism behind increased incidence of infection observed in older transplant patients. The ability to measure biological age would allow for patient risk stratification and individualization of immunosuppression, improving outcomes for the growing numbers of older patients undergoing kidney transplantation.