Search

Introduction & Purpose Coaching is recognized as a complex socio-educational interaction (Jones, 2007), a view supported by the German Football Association (DFB). The DFB emphasizes reflection in the development of football coaches, seeing it as essential for the quality of coaching and the holistic development of youth players. Reflective competence (RC) is seen as a key component of professionalization (DFB, 2022), defined as the ability and willingness to comprehensively deal with one’s own knowledge and actions in breadth and to achieve a certain depth in the reflexive and transformative engagement with issues (Krieg & Kreis, 2014). Studies show that coaches learn primarily through observation and experience (Cushion, et al., 2012), which risks perpetuating outdated behaviors. Against this background, our study asks: What (breadth) and how (depth) do youth coaches reflect on their knowledge and coaching practice? Method Seven coaches from DFB selection centers in Bavaria participated in the study. Their training sessions were videotaped and used for reflection in stimulated recall interviews (Dempsey, 2010). Coaches were asked about their understanding of reflection using narrative prompts and to reflect independently on their training sessions using the video sequences. Analysis included categorizing the understanding and relevance of reflection, as well as the breadth and depth of reflection, taking into account individual differences. Result Coaches understood reflection as “thinking about oneself” or “looking back” to consciously justify or improve practices. They showed a high level of willingness to reflect, especially valuing peer feedback. In terms of breadth, coaches mostly reflected on corrective feedback behaviors, error patterns, or training alternatives. However, the depth of reflection was limited; coaches often moved to transformative reflection without deeply analyzing issues, lacking detailed descriptions against related assumptions, previous experiences, or theoretical explanations. Discussion Coaches focused primarily on optimizing practices rather than examining issues in depth. The breadth of reflection is consistent with the DFB's shift from coach-dominated to player-dominated training practices. Conclusion Our study highlights the critical role of reflection in the professional development of youth soccer coaches at DFB selection centers in Bavaria. While coaches show a significant willingness to engage in reflective practices, there is a notable deficiency in the depth of their reflection. This highlights the need for enhanced reflective training programs that encourage deeper, more comprehensive engagement with coaching practices and theoretical knowledge. By fostering such reflective competence, coaches can contribute to a more nuanced and effective coaching methodology, ultimately benefiting the holistic development of youth players. References Cushion, J., Ford, P., & Williams, M. (2012). Coach behaviours and practice structures in youth soccer: Implications for talent development. Journal of Sports Sciences, 30(15), 1631–1641. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2012.721930 Dempsey, N. P. (2010). Stimulated recall interviews in ethnography. Qualitative Sociology, 33(3), 349-367. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11133-010-9157-x Deutscher Fußball Bund. (05.02.2022). DFB-Akademie startet mit neuem Ausbildungskonzept. https://www.dfb.de/news/detail/dfb-akademie-startet-mit-neuem-ausbildungskonzept-236675/ Jones, R. L. (2007). Coaching redefined: An everyday pedagogical endeavour. Sport, Education and Society, 12(2),159-173. https://doi.org/10.1080/13573320701287486 Krieg, M., & Kreis, A. (2014). Reflexion in Mentoringgesprächen – Ein Mythos? [Reflection in mentoring discussions - A myth?] Zeitschrift für Hochschulentwicklung, 9(1),103-117. https://doi.org/10.3217/zfhe-9-01/11

Under the high cognitive pressure of a translation task, secondary school Classics students often make dictionary mistakes. Research indicates that successful students use a lemma's meta-information to engage in a feedback loop between text and dictionary. Using eye-tracking data of expert learners, this study examined how successful students employ the different types of lemma information while limiting their cognitive load. We found that students primarily manage their cognitive load by using boldface definitions as stepping-stones, but navigate through meta-information when it (1) can effectively reduce the amount of definitions and (2) refers to (morphological) features directly visible in the text. Alternatively, they use meta-information as a backup plan, when they are stuck or want to confirm a hypothesis.

Abstract Background Given the complexity and variety in treatment options for advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD), shared decision-making (SDM) can be a challenge. SDM is needed for making decisions that best suit patients’ needs and their medical and living situations. SDM might be experienced differently by different stakeholders. This study aimed to explore clinical practice and perspectives on SDM in nephrology from three angles: observers, patients and healthcare professionals (HCPs). Methods An explanatory sequential mixed methods design was used. First, in the quantitative part of the study, outpatient consultations with patients with advanced chronic kidney disease (eGFR < 20 ml/min) were video recorded and SDM was assessed using the OPTION5 instrument. Subsequently, in the qualitative part, patients and HCPs reflected on their own SDM behaviour during individual stimulated recall interviews which were analysed using deductive thematic content analysis. Results Twenty nine consultations were recorded and observed in seven hospitals. The mean SDM score was 51 (range 25–80), indicating that SDM was applied to a moderate extent. The stimulated recall interviews with patients showed that they rely on the information provision and opinion of HCPs, expect consistency and support, and desire a proactive role. They also expect to be questioned by the HCP about their SDM preferences. HCPs said they were willing to incorporate patients’ preferences in SDM, as long as there are no medical contraindications. They also prefer patients to take a prominent role in SDM. HCPs ascribe various roles to themselves in supporting patients’ decision-making. Conclusions Although SDM was applied by HCPs to a moderate extent, improvement is needed, especially in helping patients get the information they need and in making sure that every patient is involved in SDM. This is even more important given the complex nature of the disease and the relatively high prevalence of limited health literacy among patients with chronic kidney disease.

Comparing data distributions is a fundamental activity in statistics and a motivating learning opportunity in schools to initiate statistical thinking. Research has shown that many students tend to perceive a data distribution as a collection of individual values rather than as a conceptual entity that has certain features such as center, spread, and shape. These difficulties are reflected in students’ tendency to focus on local details of the distribution (so-called local view of data) instead of referring to differences between the distributions as a whole (so-called global view of data). While many authors refer to school students’ conceptions and difficulties related to their view of data, there is, to the best of our knowledge, no empirical study that investigated their actual viewing behavior (local vs. global) when comparing distributions. The central assumption of this study is that specific eye-tracking measures constitute indicators for the perceiving and processing of local vs. global distributional features. For this purpose, hypotheses for differences in certain eye-tracking measures (fixation count, saccade amplitude, and saccade direction) between students with a local and global view of data were theoretically derived and empirically investigated using a methodological combination of eye-tracking and stimulated recall interviews. We analyzed data of 25 sixth-grade students who each completed four items on distributional comparisons. The results showed strong positive inter-item correlations for all eye-tracking measures, indicating high internal consistency in participants’ gaze behavior across all items. Based on the analysis of the eye-tracking stimulated recall interviews, we split our sample into those students who perceived and processed global features in half or more of the items (global view) and those below that threshold (local view). In line with our theoretically derived hypotheses, students with a global compared to a local view of data had on average significantly fewer fixations, longer saccade amplitudes, and a higher relative number of horizontal saccades. These results suggest that eye-tracking can assist in identifying students’ conceptions and difficulties related to a local vs. global view of data. Implications for school practice and further research are discussed.

Under the high cognitive pressure of a translation task, secondary school Classics students often make dictionary mistakes. Research indicates that successful students use a lemma's meta-information to engage in a feedback loop between text and dictionary. Using eye-tracking data of expert learners, this study examined how successful students employ the different types of lemma information while limiting their cognitive load. We found that students primarily manage their cognitive load by using boldface definitions as stepping-stones, but navigate through meta-information when it (1) can effectively reduce the amount of definitions and (2) refers to (morphological) features directly visible in the text. Alternatively, they use meta-information as a backup plan, when they are stuck or want to confirm a hypothesis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Given the complexity and variety in treatment options for advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD), shared decision-making (SDM) can be a challenge. SDM is needed for making decisions that best suit patients' needs and their medical and living situations. SDM might be experienced differently by different stakeholders. This study aimed to explore clinical practice and perspectives on SDM in nephrology from three angles: observers, patients and healthcare professionals (HCPs).Methods: An explanatory sequential mixed methods design was used. First, in the quantitative part of the study, outpatient consultations with patients with advanced chronic kidney disease (eGFR < 20 ml/min) were video recorded and SDM was assessed using the OPTION5 instrument. Subsequently, in the qualitative part, patients and HCPs reflected on their own SDM behaviour during individual stimulated recall interviews which were analysed using deductive thematic content analysis.Results: Twenty nine consultations were recorded and observed in seven hospitals. The mean SDM score was 51 (range 25-80), indicating that SDM was applied to a moderate extent. The stimulated recall interviews with patients showed that they rely on the information provision and opinion of HCPs, expect consistency and support, and desire a proactive role. They also expect to be questioned by the HCP about their SDM preferences. HCPs said they were willing to incorporate patients' preferences in SDM, as long as there are no medical contraindications. They also prefer patients to take a prominent role in SDM. HCPs ascribe various roles to themselves in supporting patients' decision-making.Conclusions: Although SDM was applied by HCPs to a moderate extent, improvement is needed, especially in helping patients get the information they need and in making sure that every patient is involved in SDM. This is even more important given the complex nature of the disease and the relatively high prevalence of limited health literacy among patients with chronic kidney disease. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of International Journal of Early Childhood is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Drawing on language teacher cognition research and using a mix-method research design, the present study tried to offer a conceptual framework for the pedagogical knowledge base in English Language Teaching (ELT). The aim was to see what categories of knowledge Iranian English language teachers use in their teaching. Stimulated recall interviews were used with 6 practicing EFL teachers to map out the categories and units of pedagogical knowledge that they drew upon in their teaching practices. At the same time, semi-structured interviews were carried out with 10 Subject Matter Experts (SMEs) and 10 experienced EFL teachers to probe into their judgments and opinions regarding the important domains of pedagogical knowledge for English language teachers. Overall, the findings pointed to a 7 component model of pedagogical knowledge in ELT. The components of this tentative model included Knowledge of Language, Knowledge of Teaching, Knowledge of Learning, Knowledge of Classroom Management, Knowledge of Students, Knowledge of Culture, and Knowledge of Context. The implications of these findings for teacher education programs are discussed at the end.

Little is known about instructional means by which the aesthetic experience of mathematics can be enhanced for undergraduate learners. This paper presents and discusses an iterative lesson design process towards creating an opportunity for students to appreciate the beauty of an unexpected solution to a challenging calculus problem. The lesson design draws on insights from both mathematics education research on aesthetics and research on aesthetic appreciation in music. The data were collected over the course of five lessons with different groups of calculus students in which the intended problem was presented in two different ways. In addition, stimulated-recall interviews were conducted with nine students who took part in the later lessons and exhibited strong emotions regarding the problem. The data suggest that the students' aesthetic response to the problem was essentially conditioned by the extent of their surprise as a result of revealing a clever solution to the problem after being exposed to repeated failed attempts. Implications for practice are drawn. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim To assess the use of artefacts in semi-structured, stimulated-recall interviews in a study exploring mentors' decisions regarding students' competence in practice. Background Few empirical studies have examined how mentors reach a decision when assessing students' performance in practice. Concerns have repeatedly been voiced that students may lack essential skills at the point of registration or that mentors may have failed or been reticent to judge students' performance as unsatisfactory. Data sources Student practice assessment documents (PADs) were used in stimulated-recall (SR) interviews with mentors to explore decision making. Review methods A review of the literature identified that artefacts can play a role in triggering a more comprehensive retrospective examination of decision making, thus helping to capture the essence of a mentor's decision overtime and in context. Discussion Use of an artefact to stimulate recall can elicit evidence of thought processes, which may be difficult to obtain in a normal, semi-structured interview. PADs proved to be a valuable way to generate naturalistic decision making. In addition, discussion of artefacts created by participants can promote participant-driven enquiry, thereby reducing researcher bias. Conclusion Identifying an approach that captures post hoc decision making based on sustained engagement and interaction between students and their mentors was a challenge. Artefacts can be used to address the difficulties associated with retrospective introspection about a unique decision. Implications for practice/research There is the potential to increase the use of artefacts in healthcare research. SR can also help novice mentors develop their skills in making decisions regarding assessments of students [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Much is known about sport officials' decisions (e.g., anticipation, visual search, and prior experience). Comprehension of the entire decision process, however, requires an ecologically valid examination. To address this, we implemented a 2-part study using an expertise paradigm with ice hockey referees.Purpose:Study 1 explored the strategies referees indicated they used to make decisions. For Study 2, we sought to confirm the emergent codes of Study 1 and further examine referee expertise and evaluations of decision making.Method:In Study 1, 2 elite, 2 intermediate, and 2 novice referees wore helmet cameras for 1 game and participated in stimulated recall interviews, which were coded using theoretical and focused codes. Study 2 involved focus groups that each watched and commented on 2 helmet camera videotapes from Study 1; 1 videotape consisted of an elite referee's game and the other included an intermediate referee's game. The focus-group data were analyzed using the same coding structure from Study 1.Results:Combined, 3 distinct theoretical codes were identified: (a) primary referee strategies, (b) secondary referee strategies, and (c) cognitive and situational influences on refereeing. Study 1 showed that elite referees demonstrated more sophisticated knowledge of the 3 theoretical codes. In Study 2, elite referees demonstrated enhanced declarative knowledge compared with intermediate and novice participants.Conclusions:Elite referees have more elaborate knowledge bases than do nonelite referees. In the discussion, we explain our results and link them with the action plan profiles framework. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Existing comparative studies between peer and teacher feedback in English writing classes have predominantly used frequency measures of peer and teacher feedback in learners’ revisions to suggest their relative values for developing learners’ writing proficiency. However, learners do not necessarily understand the feedback that is used in their redrafts. This study distinguished learners’ use from their understanding of peer and teacher feedback. Eighteen Chinese university English learners participated in the study for sixteen weeks. Three research methods were adopted: (a) content analyses of learners’ use of feedback, (b) stimulated recall interviews on learners’ understanding of feedback, and (c) interviews on the factors that affected learners’ responses to feedback. The findings suggested that the learners used more teacher than peer feedback in their redrafts. However, interviews with these learners revealed that they used a larger percentage of teacher feedback than peer feedback without understanding its significance or value. Student interviews uncovered learners’ passive acceptance of teacher feedback and the facilitative role of first language use in peer interaction. This study suggests that learners’ understanding of feedback should be taken as at least an equally important factor as learners’ use of feedback in examining the relative value of peer and teacher feedback for developing learners’ writing proficiency. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Many researchers use information and communications technology (ICT)-tools to augment learning in a great variety of tasks. Their effects are generally measured in terms of intended outcomes. This article argues for the use of additional, more general measures to obtain a more complete impression of the effects of ICT-tools. The first study presented in this article shows why tools should not only be studied in terms of their specific intended outcomes, but also in terms of their effects on working memory, and the cognitive mechanisms needed to achieve the intended outcomes. The second study uses cognitive load measurements and stimulated recall interviews to obtain a more comprehensive view of the effects of learning tools. Results suggest that traditional outcome measures need to be complemented with quantitative and qualitative measures of cognitive processes to substantiate conclusions about intended effects of ICT-tools. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The purpose of lifelogging is to help users collect data for self-monitoring and reflection. We have in this study explored how lifelogging technology (a camera and a heart rate monitor) can change user experience (UX) research, and we describe a novel approach. Data was collected for three days with four participants, and a 4–6-hours co-creation workshop with stimulated recall interview was held with each of them to create an experience timeline. The timeline includes self-reported key experiences, lifelog stimulated experiences, heart rate, decisions, and valence. The results show that the number of experiences in the timeline that come from data points stimulated by the lifelogging, are as many as the self-reported data points. Lessons learned include that the use of lifelogging produces highly detailed UX research, but it is very time consuming, due to the sheer amount of data. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]