A few years ago, Slater, Johnson, Cohen, Comello, and Ewoldsen (2014) proposed an interesting perspective about people’s impetus to engage with narratives: the temporarily expanding the boundaries of the self (TEBOTS) model. The TEBOTS model suggests that the self is composed of three psychological elements, which are self-esteem, self-control, and self-presentation (Baumeister, 1998), and is inherently restricting individuals’ self-realization. To deal with those inherent limitations of the self, people turn to narratives for temporary self-expansion to satisfy fundamental intrinsic needs (Ryan & Deci, 2000). Utilization of the TEBOTS model has already generated promising findings (Eden, Daalmans, & Johnson, 2017; Johnson, Ewoldsen, & Slater, 2015; Johnson, Slater, Silver, & Ewoldsen, 2016; Krakowiak & Tsay-Vogel, 2018), indicating that it has the potential to explain psychological processes that were not previously fully disclosed. That said, past research on the TEBOTS model has not looked into self-esteem as a predictor of narrative engagement, even though “[s]elf-esteem is arguably one of the most important constructs in psychology” (Rhodewalt & Tragakis, 2003, p. 66). For the TEBOTS model, Slater et al. (2014) used Baumeister’s (1998) definition of selfhood, which postulates that the self consists of three psychological aspects: self-esteem, self-presentation, and self-control. Given the importance that Slater et al. (2014) hereby assigned self-esteem as a potential predictor of narrative engagement in their TEBOTS model, it seems inevitable to scrutinize it in the realm of TEBOTS research. To fill the gap, a preliminary study (Study 1) was preregistered and conducted (see Explanation of Existing Data for more details). Results of Study 1 found that decreased state self-esteem did not predict greater narrative engagement, thus falsifying the study’s predictions based on the TEBOTS model. To test if state self-esteem influences narrative engagement, like Study 1, this follow-up study will test the same hypotheses by implementing a slightly altered research design which includes two narratives instead of one. In doing so, the follow-up study serves the general need for a replication to test the explanatory power of the results of Study 1 and launches further investigation of the hitherto elusive role that state self-esteem plays in the context of self expansion. Additionally, the incorporation of a second narrative allows for more adequate inspection of the limitations of Study 1 regarding the narrative (see Hypotheses for more details). References: Baumeister, R. F. (1998). The self. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (4th ed., pp. 680–740). New York: McGraw-Hill. Eden, A., Daalmans, S., & Johnson, B. K. (2017). Morality predicts enjoyment but not appreciation of morally ambiguous characters. Media Psychology, 20(3), 349–373. doi:10.1080/15213269.2016.1182030 Johnson, B. K., Ewoldsen, D. R., Slater, M. D. (2015). Self-control depletion and narrative: Testing a prediction of the TEBOTS model. Media Psychology, 18(2), 196–220. doi:10.1080/15213269.2014.978872 Johnson, B. K., Slater, M. D., Silver, N. A., & Ewoldsen, D. R. (2016). Entertainment and expanding boundaries of the self: Relief from the constraints of the everyday. Journal of Communication, 66(3), 386–408. doi:10.1111/jcom.12228 Krakowiak, K. M., & Tsay-Vogel, M. (2018). Are good characters better for us? The effect of morality salience on entertainment selection and recovery outcomes. Mass Communication and Society, 21(3), 320–344. doi:10.1080/15205436.2017.1407797 Leary, M. R. (2004). The sociometer, self-esteem, and the regulation of interpersonal behavior. In R. F. Baumeister & K. D. Vohs (Eds.), The handbook of self-regulation: Research, theory, and application (pp. 373–391). New York: Guilford. Leary, M. R., & Baumeister, R. F. (2000). The nature and function of self-esteem: Sociometer theory. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 32, pp. 1–62). San Diego, CA: Academic Press. Leary, M. R., Haupt, A. L., Strausser, K. S., & Chokel, J. T. (1998). Calibrating the sociometer: The relationship between interpersonal appraisals and state self- esteem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(5), 1290–1299. Mruk, C. J. (2006). Self-esteem research, theory, and practice: Toward a positive psychology of self- esteem (3rd ed.). New York: Springer. Rhodewalt, F., & Tragakis, M. W. (2003). Self-esteem and self-regulation: Toward optimal studies of self-esteem. Psychological Inquiry, 14(1), 66–70. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 58–78. doi:10.1037110003-066X.55.1.68 Slater, M. D., Johnson, B. K., Cohen, J., Comello, M. L. G., & Ewoldsen, D. R. (2014). Temporarily expanding the boundaries of the self: Motivations for entering the story world and implications for narrative effects. Journal of Communication, 64(3), 439–455. doi:10.1111/jcom.12100