Search

Blood cell counts for all patients on study, except lymphocytes.

PDF file - 155K

Detail of treatment-related toxicities.

PDF file - 126K, Detailed data are shown for selected proteins assayed by RPPA.

PDF file - 39K, Lymphocyte counts for all patients on study - detail.

Purpose: A CTEP-sponsored phase II trial was conducted to evaluate safety and clinical activity of combination therapy with CCI-779 (temsirolimus) and bevacizumab in patients with advanced melanoma.Experimental Design: Patients with unresectable stage III to IV melanoma were treated intravenously with temsirolimus 25 mg weekly and bevacizumab 10 mg every 2 weeks. Adverse events were recorded using CTCAE v3.0. Tumor response was assessed by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors and overall survival was recorded. Correlative studies measured protein kinases and histology of tumor biopsies and immune function in peripheral blood.Results: Seventeen patients were treated. Most patients tolerated treatment well, but 2 had grade 4 lymphopenia and 1 developed reversible grade 2 leukoencephalopathy. Best clinical response was partial response (PR) in 3 patients [17.7%, 90% confidence interval (CI) 5, 0–39.6], stable disease at 8 weeks (SD) in 9 patients, progressive disease (PD) in 4 patients, and not evaluable in 1 patient. Maximal response duration for PR was 35 months. Ten evaluable patients had BRAFWT tumors, among whom 3 had PRs, 5 had SD, and 2 had PD. Correlative studies of tumor biopsies revealed decreased phospho-S6K (d2 and d23 vs. d1, P < 0.001), and decreased mitotic rate (Ki67+) among melanoma cells by d23 (P = 0.007). Effects on immune functions were mixed, with decreased alloreactive T-cell responses and decreased circulating CD4+FoxP3+ cells.Conclusion: These data provide preliminary evidence for clinical activity of combination therapy with temsirolimus and bevacizumab, which may be greater in patients with BRAFwt melanoma. Mixed effects on immunologic function also support combination with immune therapies. Clin Cancer Res; 19(13); 3611–20. ©2013 AACR.

Supplemental text for Methods and Results.

PDF file - 208K, Blood cell counts for all patients on study, except lymphocytes.

Detailed data are shown for selected proteins assayed by RPPA.

Lymphocyte counts for all patients on study - detail

PDF file - 118K

T-cell infiltration into the metastatic melanoma microenvironment (MME) correlates with improved patient survival. However, diffuse infiltration into tumor occurs in only 8% of melanoma metastases. Little is known about mechanisms governing T-cell infiltration into human melanoma metastases or about how those mechanisms may be altered therapeutically. We hypothesized that T cells in the MME would be enriched for chemokine receptors CCR4, CCR5, CXCR3 and homing receptors relevant to the tissue site. Viably cryopreserved single cell suspensions from nineteen melanoma metastases representing three metastatic sites (tumor-infiltrated lymph node, skin and small bowel) were evaluated by multiparameter flow cytometry and compared to benign lymph nodes and peripheral blood mononuclear cells from patients with Stage IIB-IV melanoma. T cells in the melanoma metastases contained large effector memory populations, high proportions of activated, moderately differentiated cells and few regulatory T cells. Site-specific homing was suggested in bowel, with high expression of CCR9. We neither encounter the anticipated enrichment of integrin α4β7 in bowel, cutaneous leukocyte antigen (CLA) in skin, nor integrin α4β1 or receptor CXCR3 in metastatic sites. Retention integrins αEβ7, α1β1 and α2β1 were significantly elevated in metastases. These data suggest limited tissue site-specific homing to human melanoma metastases, but a significant role for retention integrins in maintaining intratumoral T cells. Our findings also raise the possibility that T-cell homing, infiltration, and retention in melanoma metastases may be increased by increasing expression of ligands for CLA, α4β1 and CXCR3 on intratumoral endothelium.

In 2011, the FDA approved the drug vemurafenib, a potent kinase inhibitor with specificity for the BRAF V600E mutation, for the treatment of metastatic melanoma. While this drug is otherwise well-tolerated, many patients develop cutaneous toxicities. This report demonstrates multiple cutaneous toxicities in a patient while undergoing treatment with vemurafenib.

Purpose: A CTEP-sponsored phase II trial was conducted to evaluate safety and clinical activity of combination therapy with CCI-779 (temsirolimus) and bevacizumab in patients with advanced melanoma. Experimental Design: Patients with unresectable stage III to IV melanoma were treated intravenously with temsirolimus 25 mg weekly and bevacizumab 10 mg every 2 weeks. Adverse events were recorded using CTCAE v3.0. Tumor response was assessed by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors and overall survival was recorded. Correlative studies measured protein kinases and histology of tumor biopsies and immune function in peripheral blood. Results: Seventeen patients were treated. Most patients tolerated treatment well, but 2 had grade 4 lymphopenia and 1 developed reversible grade 2 leukoencephalopathy. Best clinical response was partial response (PR) in 3 patients [17.7%, 90% confidence interval (CI) 5, 0–39.6], stable disease at 8 weeks (SD) in 9 patients, progressive disease (PD) in 4 patients, and not evaluable in 1 patient. Maximal response duration for PR was 35 months. Ten evaluable patients had BRAFWT tumors, among whom 3 had PRs, 5 had SD, and 2 had PD. Correlative studies of tumor biopsies revealed decreased phospho-S6K (d2 and d23 vs. d1, P < 0.001), and decreased mitotic rate (Ki67+) among melanoma cells by d23 (P = 0.007). Effects on immune functions were mixed, with decreased alloreactive T-cell responses and decreased circulating CD4+FoxP3+ cells. Conclusion: These data provide preliminary evidence for clinical activity of combination therapy with temsirolimus and bevacizumab, which may be greater in patients with BRAFwt melanoma. Mixed effects on immunologic function also support combination with immune therapies. Clin Cancer Res; 19(13); 3611–20. ©2013 AACR.

Survival of solid organ transplant patients has been prolonged, leading to increased incidence of non-melanoma skin cancers. Metastatic squamous cell carcinoma is an increasing problem in these patients. This paper reviews the evidence available for the treatment of advanced squamous cell carcinoma with the epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor, cetuximab.

Immune cells infiltrating the microenvironment of melanoma metastases may either limit or promote tumor progression, but the characteristics that distinguish these effects are obscure. In this study, we systematically evaluated the composition and organization of immune cells that infiltrated melanoma metastases in human patients. Three histologic patterns of immune cell infiltration were identified, designated immunotypes A, B, and C. Immunotype A was characterized by no immune cell infiltrate. Immunotype B was characterized by infiltration of immune cells limited only to regions proximal to intratumoral blood vessels. Immunotype C was characterized by a diffuse immune cell infiltrate throughout a metastatic tumor. These immunotypes represented 29%, 63%, and 8% of metastases with estimated median survival periods of 15, 23, and 130 months, respectively. Notably, from immunotypes A to C, there were increasing proportions of B cells and decreasing proportions of macrophages. Overall, the predominant immune cells were T cells (53%), B cell lineage cells (33%), and macrophages (13%), with natural killer and mature dendritic cells only rarely present. Whereas higher densities of CD8+ T cells correlated best with survival, a higher density of CD45+ leukocytes, T cells, and B cells also correlated with increased survival. Together, our findings reveal striking differences in the immune infiltrate in melanoma metastases in patients, suggesting microenvironmental differences in immune homing receptors and ligands that affect immune cell recruitment. These findings are important, not only by revealing how the immune microenvironment can affect outcomes but also because they reveal characteristics that may help improve individualized therapy for patients with metastatic melanoma. Cancer Res; 72(5); 1070–80. ©2012 AACR.

Neurogenic pain and pruritus are the common chief complaints at dermatology office visits. Unfortunately, they are also notoriously difficult conditions to treat. Topical capsaicin used as a single therapy or as an adjuvant offers a low-risk option for patients who do not achieve control on other therapies. This chapter presents the evidence behind topical capsaicin use in dermatologic conditions characterized by neurogenic pain or pruritus, including postherpetic neuralgia, notalgia paresthetica, brachioradial pruritus, lichen simplex chronicus, prurigo nodularis, pruritus ani, pruritus of hemodialysis, aquagenic pruritus, apocrine chromhidrosis, lipodermatosclerosis, alopecia areata, and psoriasis. It presents the most common capsaicin formulations, dosages, and durations of treatment for each condition. Additionally, the chapter addresses various adverse effects and limitations in the use of topical capsaicin in dermatology.

Neurogenic pain and pruritus are the common chief complaints at dermatology office visits. Unfortunately, they are also notoriously difficult conditions to treat. Topical capsaicin used as a single therapy or as an adjuvant offers a low-risk option for patients who do not achieve control on other therapies. This chapter presents the evidence behind topical capsaicin use in dermatologic conditions characterized by neurogenic pain or pruritus, including postherpetic neuralgia, notalgia paresthetica, brachioradial pruritus, lichen simplex chronicus, prurigo nodularis, pruritus ani, pruritus of hemodialysis, aquagenic pruritus, apocrine chromhidrosis, lipodermatosclerosis, alopecia areata, and psoriasis. It presents the most common capsaicin formulations, dosages, and durations of treatment for each condition. Additionally, the chapter addresses various adverse effects and limitations in the use of topical capsaicin in dermatology.

We conducted a randomized clinical trial in 45 patients with resected AJCC stage IIB-IV melanoma to characterize cellular and molecular events at sites of immunization with incomplete Freund's adjuvant (IFA) alone, or a melanoma vaccine in IFA. At a primary vaccine site, all patients received a multi-peptide melanoma vaccine in IFA. At a replicate vaccine site, which was biopsied, group 1 received IFA only; group 2 received vaccine in IFA. Lymphocytes isolated from replicate vaccine site microenvironments (VSME) were compared to time-matched peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) in ELISpot and flow cytometry assays. Compared to PBMC, the VSME had fewer naïve and greater proportions of effector memory CD8(+) T cells (TCD8). The vast majority of TCD8 within the VSME were activated (CD69(+)), with a concentration of antigen-specific (tetramer(pos)) cells in the VSME, particularly in vaccine sites with peptide (group 2). CXCR3(+) lymphocytes were concentrated in the VSME of all patients, suggesting IFA-induced chemokine recruitment. TCD8 expression of retention integrins αEβ7 and α1β1 was elevated in VSME, with the highest levels observed in antigen-specific cells in VSME containing peptide (group 2). TCD8 retained in the VSME of both groups were strikingly dysfunctional, with minimal IFN-γ production in response to peptide stimulation and few tetramer(pos) cells producing IFN-γ. These data suggest that vaccine-induced selective retention and dysfunction of antigen-specific TCD8 within VSME may represent a significant mechanism underlying transient immune responses and low clinical response rates to peptide vaccines administered in IFA.

Background Adjuvant chemotherapy is often required for the treatment of bone cancers after tumor resection, which often results in a large continuity defect. The immunosuppressive side effects could instead be exploited to allow immediate reconstruction with a composite tissue allograft (CTA) that would provide for replacement of tissues. We used a short course of doxorubicin to achieve a novel method of immunosuppression in a rat model undergoing CTA to create an immunological environment for allograft survival. Materials & methods The Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee-approved protocol consisted of 3 experimental groups. Groups 2 and 3 consisted of Brown Norway rats (n = 5) as allograft donors and Lewis rats (n = 5) as transplant recipients. An abdominal wall CTA was harvested off the superficial inferior epigastric vessels. Doxorubicin therapy was administered in group 3 animals. Survival of the CTA was assessed by physical examination and histological analysis. Results Allotransplant without treatment showed complete clinical and histologic rejection by day 7. Allotransplant rats treated with doxorubicin had clinically and histologically normal grafts through day 10. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed a statistically significant difference, with increased CTA survival time to end point with doxorubicin treatment, from a mean of 8.8 days in group 2 to 16.4 days in group 3. Conclusions Allotransplant flaps without treatment developed complete clinical and histological rejection. The allotransplant group which received doxorubicin showed a delay of allograft rejection with an 86% increased CTA graft survival time. This demonstrates the feasibility of the immunosuppression side effect caused by chemotherapy to prevent rejection of a CTA.

8530 Background: A CTEP-sponsored phase II trial was performed to evaluate safety and clinical activity of combination therapy with CCI-779 (temsirolimus) and bevacizumab in patients with advanced melanoma. Correlative studies assessed mTOR signaling in tumor biopsies and evidence of induced immunologic dysfunction systemically. Methods: 17 patients with stage III or IV melanoma were enrolled and treated with temsirolimus (25 mg IV weekly) and bevacizumab (10 mg/kg IV every 14d, starting d.8) for up to 13 months. Clinical response was determined by RECIST criteria. Adverse events were assessed (CTCAE v3.0). Blood was collected d.1, 2, and 23 (to assess immune function), and tumor biopsies were obtained (to assess protein kinase activity and melanoma cell proliferation). Results: Treatment-related grade 3 or 4 adverse events occurred in 5 and 1 patients, respectively; 1 patient developed reversible leukoencephalopathy. In 16 patients evaluable for clinical response, best overall response was a partial response (PR) in 3 patients (19%), stable disease at 8 weeks (SD) in 9 patients (56%), and progressive disease in 4 patients. Thus, disease control rate (DCR = PR + SD) was 75%. Ten of the patients had BRAF wild-type (BRAFwt) melanomas: these accounted for the 3 PRs (30%), and a DCR of 100%. Maximal response duration has exceeded 3 years for a BRAFwt patient. mTOR signaling was inhibited in melanoma metastases, based on decreased phospho-S6 kinase after 24h temsirolimus. Ki67+ melanoma cells in tumor biopsies decreased significantly by day 23 (p = 0.007, F-test), most notably in clinical responders. There was no significant alteration of T cell and NK function with combination treatment, by ELIspot and cytotoxicity assays. Conclusions: Combination therapy with temsirolimus and bevacizumab is well-tolerated in patients with advanced melanoma and has intriguing clinical activity. The most notable responses were in patients with BRAFwt tumors, a population with no accepted effective targeted therapy. Decreases in Ki67+ melanoma cells may be associated with clinical response. The lack of immunologic dysfunction supports future combination with immune therapies.