Search

Preeya K Gupta,1,2 Rolando Toyos,3 John D Sheppard,4 Melissa Toyos,3 Francis S Mah,5 Brian Bird,6 Pamela E Theriot,7 Don Higgins8 1Triangle Eye Consultants, Raleigh, NC, USA; 2Department of Ophthalmology, Tulane University, New Orleans, LA, USA; 3Toyos Clinic, Nashville, TN, USA; 4Virginia Eye Consultants, Norfolk, VA, USA; 5Scripps Clinic, La Jolla, CA, USA; 6Department of Ophthalmology, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, VA, USA; 7Lusk Eye Specialists, Shreveport, LA, USA; 8Dry Eye Treatment Center of Connecticut, Plainville, CT, USACorrespondence: John D Sheppard, Virginia Eye Consultants, 241 Corporate Blvd, Norfolk, VA, USA, Tel +1 757 622-2200, Fax +1 757 622-4866, Email jsheppard@cvphealth.comAbstract: Dry eye disease (DED) is a common, multifactorial ocular disease impacting 5% to 20% of people in Western countries and 45% to 70% in Asian countries. Despite the prevalence of DED and the number of treatment approaches available, signs and symptoms of the disease continue to limit the quality of life for many patients. Standard over-the-counter treatment approaches and behavior/environmental modifications may help some cases but more persistent forms often require pharmacological interventions. Approved and investigational pharmaceutical approaches attempt to treat the signs and symptoms of DED in different ways and tend to have varying tolerability among patients. While several pharmacological approaches are the standard for persistent and severe disease, mechanical options provide alternate treatment modalities that attempt to balance efficacy and comfort. Newer approaches target the causes of DED, utilizing novel delivery methods to minimize irritation and adverse events. Here, we review approved and investigational approaches to treating DED and compare patient tolerability.Keywords: dry eye disease, tolerability, safety, pharmaceutical interventions, mechanical interventions

David Clark,1 Paul Karpecki,2 Anne Marie Salapatek,3 John D Sheppard,4 Todd C Brady1 1Aldeyra Therapeutics, Lexington, MA, USA; 2Kentucky Eye Institute, Lexington, KY, USA; 3Cliantha Research, Mississauga, ON, Canada; 4Virginia Eye Consultants, Norfolk, VA, USACorrespondence: Todd C BradyAldeyra Therapeutics, Inc., 131 Hartwell Avenue, Suite 320, Lexington, MA, 02421, USATel +1 781 761-4904Email tbrady@aldeyra.comPurpose: To assess the prophylactic and treatment activity of reproxalap, a novel reactive aldehyde species inhibitor, in a real-world model of allergen exposure.Methods: In a randomized, double-masked, vehicle-controlled, crossover Phase 2 trial, 70 adult patients with ≥ 2 years of moderate to severe allergic conjunctivitis history, a positive skin test to ragweed pollen, and allergen chamber-induced ocular itching and redness scores of ≥ 2.5 and ≥ 2 (both scales range from 0 to 4), respectively, were randomized 1:1:1 to one of three sequences: 0.25% reproxalap, 0.5% reproxalap, and placebo; 0.5% reproxalap, placebo, and 0.25% reproxalap; or placebo, 0.25% reproxalap, and 0.5% reproxalap. Symptoms and conjunctival redness were assessed over 3.5 hours in an allergen chamber of aerosolized ragweed pollen (3500 grains/m3). Test article was administered bilaterally just before chamber entry and at 90 minutes after chamber entry.Results: Reproxalap was safe and well tolerated; 66 of 70 enrolled patients completed all visits. Relative to vehicle, both concentrations of reproxalap demonstrated statistically significant and clinically relevant improvements in ocular itching, tearing, and redness over the duration of exposure in the chamber (P < 0.001 for all assessments). Prophylactic and treatment activity of drug were demonstrated.Conclusion: In an allergen chamber, reproxalap, a novel reactive aldehyde species inhibitor, was statistically superior to vehicle across the typical symptoms and signs of allergic conjunctivitis. These data are among the first rigorous clinical results demonstrating drug improvement in allergic conjunctivitis in an allergen chamber, a real-world model of allergen exposure.Keywords: RASP inhibitor, allergic conjunctivitis, allergen chamber, reproxalap, inflammation

JD Sheppard,1 IP Singh21Department of Ophthalmology, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, VA, USA; 2Department of Glaucoma, The Eye Centers of Racine & Kenosha, Racine, WI, USAPurpose: With the increasing use of minimally invasive surgical techniques for intraocular pressure (IOP) lowering in glaucoma patients, there is a need to examine best practices regarding the postoperative management of these patients. Corticosteroids, though effective in controlling postoperative ocular pain and inflammation, present distinct challenges in glaucoma surgery patients, as their use can be associated with IOP elevation. Loteprednol etabonate (LE) is an ocular corticosteroid designed to have an improved safety profile relative to other corticosteroids.Methods: We report here a representative selection of cases in which patients were successfully treated with LE ophthalmic gel 0.5% (LE gel) following a variety of minimally invasive glaucoma surgery (MIGS) procedures. Cases included patients undergoing various procedures including a Trabectome combined with cataract surgery; micro-stent surgery (iStent) combined with cataract surgery; supraciliary CyPass Micro-Stent placement combined with cataract surgery; Kahook Dual Blade goniotomy; and ab interno canaloplasty using the iTrack catheter.Observations: In all cases, use of LE gel during the postoperative period appeared effective and safe in reducing inflammation and controlling pain. No adverse events or IOP elevations were noted, even in those patients continuing use of LE gel past the postoperative period for longer than six months with documented follow-up. In two cases, patients with elevated IOP using either prednisolone or difluprednate postoperatively were switched to LE gel, with a subsequent reduction in IOP.Conclusions: This selection of cases involving patients undergoing MIGS suggests that LE gel may be an effective and safe option for treating postoperative inflammation and pain following such procedures with minimal to no effect on IOP or other negative sequalae.Keywords: loteprednol etabonate, minimally invasive glaucoma surgery, intraocular pressure, postoperative pain and inflammation, safety

Mike Taylor,1 George Ousler,2 Gail Torkildsen,3 Claire Walshe,1 Matthew C T Fyfe,1 Adele Rowley,1 Steve Webber,1 John D Sheppard,4 Ajay Duggal1 1TopiVert Pharma Limited, London, UK; 2Ora Inc., Andover, MA, USA; 3Andover Eye Associates, Andover, MA, USA; 4Virginia Eye Consultants, Norfolk, VA, USA Purpose: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of topical TOP1630, a novel nonsystemic kinase inhibitor, in dry eye disease (DED).Patients and methods: A randomized, double-masked, parallel-group trial of 0.1% TOP1630 ophthalmic solution TID or placebo (vehicle without active drug) was conducted in DED subjects (n=61). Key eligibility criteria consistent with enrolling a moderate to severe DED population included >6 months DED history; OSDI© score ≥18; Schirmer’s test score ≤10 and ≥1 mm/5 minutes; tear film break-up time >1 and

John D Sheppard1,2 1Virginia Eye Consultants, 2Department of Ophthalmology, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, VA, US Abstract: Topical nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and corticosteroids, alone or in combination, have historically been used off label in the US to prevent and treat postoperative cystoid macular edema (CME). This literature review presents available data on the use of bromfenac 0.07% or 0.09% to prevent and treat CME following cataract surgery. Bromfenac is an NSAID approved to treat postoperative inflammation and reduce ocular pain following cataract surgery. Few cases of clinical CME were observed with bromfenac use in a total of 19 reviewed studies. There were no significant differences in CME incidence between bromfenac and corticosteroid-treated patients or between bromfenac- and bromfenac plus corticosteroid-treated patients. Bromfenac demonstrated comparable efficacy to other NSAIDs in preventing CME. Compared with corticosteroids, bromfenac alone or plus a corticosteroid showed similar or better efficacy in minimizing changes in retinal thickness and macular volume. In diabetic cataract surgery patients, bromfenac was comparable or superior to corticosteroids for minimizing changes in retinal thickness; also, combination therapy with bromfenac and corticosteroids may be associated with smaller changes in foveal thickness, macular thickness, and macular volume versus monotherapy with either treatment alone in this patient population. In two randomized, double-masked, placebo-controlled clinical trials with bromfenac 0.07%, CME was reported as an adverse event in 0.5% and 1.5% of patients receiving bromfenac and placebo, respectively. In an analysis of four placebo-controlled trials with bromfenac 0.09%, macular edema was reported in 0.7% and 1.4% of patients receiving bromfenac and placebo, respectively. When evaluated as treatment for acute or chronic CME, bromfenac was associated with improvement in visual acuity and reduction in retinal thickness, but few studies are available. Overall, published data suggest that bromfenac is safe and effective when used to prevent or treat CME. Large-scale placebo-controlled trials and greater standardization of CME measures are needed to establish optimal bromfenac regimens for the prophylaxis and treatment of CME following cataract surgery. Keywords: anti-inflammatory agents, nonsteroidal, NSAID, bromfenac, cystoid macular edema, Irvine–Gass syndrome

John D Sheppard,1 Arnulfo Mansur,2 Timothy L Comstock,3 John A Hovanesian4 1Virginia Eye Consultants, Norfold, VA, USA; 2Airala's Laser and Cataract Institute, Miami, FL, USA; 3Bausch and Lomb, Inc., Rochester, NY, USA; 4Harvard Eye Associates, Laguna Hills, CA, USAAbstract: Pterygium, a sun-related eye disease, presents as wing-shaped ocular surface lesions that extend from the bulbar conjunctiva onto the cornea, most commonly on the nasal side. Pterygia show characteristic histological features that suggest that inflammation plays a prominent role in their initial pathogenesis and recurrence. Appropriate surgery is the key to successful treatment of pterygia, but there is also a rationale for the use of anti-inflammatory agents to reduce the rate of recurrence following surgery. Multiple surgical techniques have been developed over the last two millennia, but these initially had little success, due to high rates of recurrence. Current management strategies, associated with lower recurrence rates, include bare sclera excision and various types of grafts using tissue glues. Adjunctive therapies include mitomycin C and 5-fluorouracil, as well as the topical ocular steroid loteprednol etabonate, which has been shown to have a lower risk of elevated intraocular pressure than have the other topical ocular steroids. Here, the surgical management of pterygium is presented from a historical perspective, and current management techniques, including the appropriate use of various adjunctive therapies, are reviewed, along with an illustrative case presentation and a discussion of the conjunctival forceps designed to facilitate surgical management. Despite thousands of years of experience with this condition, there remains a need for a more thorough understanding of pterygium and interventions to reduce both its incidence and postsurgical recurrence. Until that time, the immediate goal is to optimize surgical practices to ensure the best possible outcomes. Loteprednol etabonate, especially the ointment formulation, appears to be a safe and effective component of the perioperative regimen for this complex ocular condition, although confirmatory prospective studies are needed.Keywords: mitomycin C, recurrence, surgical management, 5-fluorouracil, pterygium, loteprednol etabonate

Abstract: The corneal epithelium, supplied by thousands of nerve endings, plays a substantial role in absorbing and distributing nutrients along the ocular surface. Many studies have explored the influence of various modalities in regulating tear production to manage corneal disorders and dry eye disease. These findings have highlighted the advantages of enhancing corneal nerve function and regeneration through neurostimulation, neural signaling, immunomodulation, topical medication application, and surgical reconstruction. The purpose of this narrative review article was to provide an overview of the current state of knowledge on this topic based on a PubMed database literature search for relevant animal and human studies investigating the modification of the trigeminal pathway to restore corneal nerve function and improve overall ocular health. Further investigation into this area of research is important to help guide new therapeutic targets for the prevention and development of treatments of corneal degeneration., (Copyright © 2024 Contact Lens Association of Ophthalmologists.)

Purpose: The purposes of this study were to bring awareness to the surgical waste generated from corneal and conjunctival surgeries and to compare those findings with the waste generated from cataract surgeries., Methods: This was an observational prospective pilot cohort study at a tertiary corneal/anterior segment private practice. All waste related to cataract, cornea, and conjunctival surgical procedures (including anesthesia waste and corneal tissue storage) was weighed. The primary outcome was total waste generated while other outcomes included surgical setting (ambulatory surgical center, hospital, and minor operating room) and comparison of corneal/conjunctival surgeries with cataract surgery., Results: Surgical waste data were collected from 119 surgeries (82 corneal/conjunctival surgeries and 37 cataract surgeries). Hospital surgeries produced more waste than ambulatory surgical center and minor operating room surgeries. Penetrating keratoplasty (2.22 kg, P = 0.483) and Descemet stripping only (2.11 kg, P = 0.326) procedures generated comparable mean waste with cataract surgery (2.07 kg) while endothelial keratoplasties produced more ( P < 0.001, 0.002). (Deep) anterior lamellar keratoplasty results depended on the surgical setting. All conjunctival surgeries produced less waste than cataract surgery., Conclusions: In comparison with cataract surgery, keratoplasties overall produced comparable or more waste while conjunctival surgeries produced less waste. The surgical setting and type of anesthesia played a substantial role in the amount of waste generated. Assessing waste production from different ophthalmic surgeries may increase awareness of the negative environmental impact of surgical waste and promote practice or legal changes to improve environmental sustainability., (Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

This is a pooled analysis from 2 phase III clinical trials investigating a water-free topical cyclosporine 0.1% for the treatment of moderate to severe dry eye. The analyses included 1162 patients: 35% with cataract, 20% with pseudophakia, and 45% without cataract. Demographics or baseline characteristics were comparable across groups except for age and vision. The cyclosporine-treated patients achieved large mean improvements from baseline by day 15: -3.7 in patients without cataract, -3.2 in patients with cataract, and -3.1 in pseudophakic patients. These improvements were statistically significantly higher compared with the respective vehicle groups. In the cataract subgroup, 59% of patients treated with cyclosporine achieved ≥3 grade improvements in corneal staining score, as early as day 15. The magnitude of the effect and early onset of action make this new cyclosporine solution a promising candidate for preoperative management of ocular surface in patients undergoing cataract surgery., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of ASCRS and ESCRS.)

Dry eye disease (DED) is one of the most common ocular surface disorders. All DED involves an imbalance between tear production and evaporation. Most cases of DED are driven by excessive evaporation, which is often associated with meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD). In evaporative DED, a deficient tear film lipid layer is believed to lead to increased tear evaporation, inflammation, and ocular surface damage. Most prescription treatments for DED address signs and symptoms by targeting tear production and/or inflammation, but they do not address excessive evaporation. Perfluorohexyloctane (PFHO) ophthalmic solution (MIEBO™; Bausch + Lomb) is a water-free, single-ingredient, preservative-free prescription eye drop that directly targets tear evaporation and is approved by the FDA to treat the signs and symptoms of DED. Results from preclinical studies indicate that PFHO has a high oxygen carrying capacity, may reduce friction on blinking, and spreads quickly over the tear film surface to form a monolayer that inhibits evaporation. These effects can lead to stabilization of the tear film to promote ocular surface healing. Further, PFHO was detected in tears for at least 6 hours in a rabbit pharmacokinetic study, and results indicate that it may improve lipid layer thickness and quality. In 2 pivotal phase 3 trials in patients with DED and clinical signs of MGD (GOBI [NCT04139798] and MOJAVE [NCT04567329]), treatment with PFHO consistently met primary efficacy end points related to DED signs and symptoms (total corneal fluorescein staining and eye dryness, respectively) and was well tolerated. Compared with use of hypotonic saline solution, instillation of PFHO led to significant improvements in signs and symptoms in as early as 2 weeks. In a long-term, open-label safety extension study, efficacy of PFHO was sustained over 12 months, and the safety profile was consistent with those of previous studies. Clinical trial results indicate that treatment with PFHO effectively and consistently reduces the signs and symptoms of DED.

Dry eye disease (DED) is a common condition in which tear film abnormalities result in a damaging cycle of tear hyperosmolarity, desiccating stress, inflammation, and ocular surface injury. In a healthy tear film, meibum produced by the meibomian glands forms a lipid layer that stabilizes the tear film and protects against aqueous tear evaporation. Excessive tear evaporation due to a deficient lipid layer is believed to be the most common cause of DED, and most evaporative DED is associated with meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD); this highlights the pathophysiologic importance of the dysfunctional tear lipid layer. Current treatments for DED may be used to supplement hyperosmolar aqueous tears, lubricate the ocular surface, increase meibum flow, decrease inflammation, promote tear production, or otherwise decrease clinical signs of ocular surface damage and/or improve symptoms. Until now, no prescription eye drop has directly addressed the excessive evaporation that occurs in most patients with DED. Perfluorohexyloctane (PFHO) ophthalmic solution (MIEBO™; Bausch + Lomb) is a preservative-free eye drop that has demonstrated the ability to form a long-lasting barrier that inhibits evaporation in preclinical studies. FDA approval of PFHO was based on results from 2 pivotal clinical trials (GOBI [NCT04139798] and MOJAVE [NCT04567329]) in patients with DED and clinical signs of MGD which demonstrated consistent improvements in both signs and symptoms of disease, with a safety profile similar to that of saline eye drops. PFHO is the first and only FDA-approved eye drop that directly targets tear evaporation in patients with DED, thereby promoting ocular surface healing and providing symptomatic relief.

Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of NOV03 (perfluorohexyloctane) ophthalmic drop for the treatment of signs and symptoms of dry eye disease (DED) associated with meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD)., Design: Randomized, double-masked, controlled trial., Methods: Patients ≥18 years of age with a history of DED and signs of MGD were randomly assigned 1:1 to treatment with NOV03 or hypotonic saline (0.6%) 4 times daily for 8 weeks. The primary sign and symptom endpoints were change from baseline to week 8 in total corneal fluorescein staining (tCFS; National Eye Institute scale) and eye dryness score (0-100 visual analog scale), respectively., Results: A total of 620 patients (NOV03, n = 311; saline, n = 309) were randomized and treated. Least-squares (LS) mean change from baseline to week 8 was statistically significantly greater for NOV03 compared with saline for both tCFS (-2.3 vs -1.1; LS mean treatment difference, -1.2 [95% confidence interval -1.7 to -0.8]; P < .001) and visual analog scale dryness score (-29.4 vs -19.2; LS mean treatment difference, -10.2 [95% CI -14.4 to -6.1]; P < .001), with statistically significant between-group differences observed as early as week 2. The incidence of ocular adverse events was similar for NOV03 (12.9%) and saline (12.3%). There were no serious adverse events and no adverse events leading to treatment discontinuation., Conclusions: In this randomized controlled trial of patients with DED associated with MGD, NOV03 significantly reduced both signs and symptoms of DED compared with hypotonic saline control. NOV03 was well tolerated, with an adverse event profile similar to that of saline., (Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: To compare cryopreserved sutureless amniotic membrane (C-SAM) and dehydrated SAM (D-SAM) outpatient treatment outcomes for persistent epithelial defects (PEDs), analyze risk factors for treatment failure, and identify adverse events., Design: Retrospective, interventional comparative clinical study., Methods: This study was a multicenter retrospective interventional cohort from 2 tertiary corneal referral practices from 2016 to 2020. The inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) PEDs treated (2) outpatient with (3) either C-SAM or D-SAM. PEDs were defined as epithelial defects present for ≥7 days after failing prior conservative therapy. The primary outcome measure was the resolution or improvement of a PED. The secondary outcomes included analysis of treatment failures and identification of adverse events. A total of 220 PEDs from 204 eyes (197 patients) treated with either C-SAM or D-SAM met the inclusion criteria., Results: A total of 100 PEDs (45.5%) resolved after single amniotic membrane administration, 46.5% (59 of 127) in the C-SAM group and 44.1% (41 of 93) in the D-SAM group (P = .727). Forty-nine PEDs neither improved nor resolved without a significant difference between the C-SAM (21.3%) and D-SAM groups (23.7%, P = .673). There was no statistically significant difference for PED resolution, PED improvement, PEDs that did not resolve/improve, or those requiring surgery between the 2 groups for initial SAM., Conclusions: C-SAM and D-SAM were both effective for treating PEDs with comparable outcomes for resolution, improvement, and need for additional surgical intervention. Specific differences in adverse events may help dictate clinical use. Inflammatory disease was a risk factor for nonresolution of all PEDs., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD) is highly prevalent and is the leading cause of evaporative dry eye disease (DED). MGD is characterized by a reduction in meibum secretion and/or a change in meibum composition that results in the disruption of the tear film lipid layer and an increase in the tear film evaporation rate. Excessive evaporation causes tear film instability, desiccation, tear hyperosmolarity, inflammation, and apoptosis of ocular surface cells, resulting in a continuous cycle of DED. The primary treatment goal for DED associated with MGD is to restore the tear film lipid layer and decrease evaporation, thereby reducing ocular signs and symptoms. The management of MGD includes home care options (eyelid hygiene, warming eye masks, ocular lubricants) and office-based treatments (manual expression, microblepharoexfoliation, thermal pulsation, intense pulsed light, intraductal probing). Topical ophthalmic prescription medications attempt to alter various factors that may contribute to DED (e.g., inflammation, bacterial growth, inadequate tear production). In this review, clinical evidence regarding available treatments and emerging therapies from randomized studies in patients with DED associated with MGD is summarized. Although some treatment modalities have been evaluated specifically for DED patients with MGD, large-scale randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm efficacy and safety in this patient population. Currently, there are no approved prescription pharmacologic treatments specifically indicated for DED associated with MGD, and those medications approved for the treatment of DED do not target the key driver of the disease (i.e., excessive evaporation). NOV03 (perfluorohexyloctane; under review with the US Food and Drug Administration) is the most advanced emerging therapy for DED associated with MGD and has demonstrated statistically significant improvements in both signs and symptoms in randomized controlled trials. Development of novel pharmacotherapies will improve therapeutic options and allow for a more individualized approach for patients with DED associated with MGD., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Importance: Dry eye disease (DED) is a common public health problem with significant impact on vision-related quality of life and well-being of patients. Medications with rapid onset of action and a good tolerability profile remain an unmet need., Objective: To assess efficacy, safety, and tolerability of a water-free cyclosporine ophthalmic solution, 0.1% (CyclASol [Novaliq GmbH]), applied twice daily in DED compared with vehicle., Design, Setting, and Participants: CyclASol for the Treatment of Signs and Symptoms of Dry Eye Disease (ESSENCE-2) was a phase 3, multicenter, randomized, double-masked, vehicle-controlled clinical study conducted from December 5, 2020, to October 8, 2021. Following a 14-day run-in period with an artificial tear administered 2 times per day, eligible participants were randomly assigned 1:1 to the treatment groups. Patients with moderate to severe DED were included in the study., Interventions: Cyclosporine solution vs vehicle administered 2 times per day for 29 days., Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end points were changes from baseline in total corneal fluorescein staining (tCFS; 0-15 National Eye Institute scale) and in dryness score (0-100 visual analog scale) at day 29. Conjunctival staining, central corneal fluorescein staining, and tCFS responders were also assessed., Results: A total of 834 study participants were randomly assigned to cyclosporine (423 [50.7%]) or vehicle (411 [49.3%]) groups at 27 sites. Participants had a mean (SD) age of 57.1 (15.8) years, and 609 (73.0%) were female individuals. The majority of participants self-identified in the following race categories: 79 Asian (9.5 %), 108 Black (12.9%), and 635 White (76.1%). Participants treated with cyclosporine solution had greater improvement in tCFS (-4.0 grades) than the vehicle group (-3.6 grades) at day 29 (change [∆] = -0.4; 95% CI, -0.8 to 0; P = .03). The dryness score showed treatment benefits from baseline in both groups: -12.2 points for cyclosporine and -13.6 points for vehicle (∆ = 1.4; 95% CI, -1.8 to 4.6; P = .38). In the cyclosporine group, 293 participants (71.6%) achieved clinically meaningful reductions of 3 grades or higher in tCFS vs 236 (59.7%) in the vehicle group (∆ = 12.6%; 95% CI, 6.0%-19.3%; P < .001). These responders showed greater improvement in symptoms at day 29 including dryness (∆ = -4.6; 95% CI, -8.0 to -1.2; P = .007) and blurred vision (Δ = -3.5; 95% CI, -6.6 to -4.0; P = .03) compared with nonresponders., Conclusions and Relevance: The ESSENCE-2 trial confirmed that treatment with a water-free cyclosporine solution, 0.1%, results in early therapeutic effects on the ocular surface compared with vehicle. The responder analyses suggest that the effect is clinically meaningful in 71.6% of participants in the cyclosporine group., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04523129.

Significance: There is a clinical necessity for dry eye disease treatments that perform across a broad range of presenting patient severities. Varenicline solution nasal spray (VNS), a unique cholinergic agonist ocular surface-sparing nasal spray therapy, demonstrated significant improvement in both signs and symptoms of dry eye disease in subjects with mild, moderate, and severe symptoms as the clinical studies enrolled a more real-world patient population., Purpose: This study evaluated efficacy outcomes for VNS in patients with mild-moderate and severe dry eye disease., Methods: An analysis of integrated data from two randomized clinical trials, ONSET-1 (NCT03636061) and ONSET-2 (NCT04036292) (vehicle control [VC], n = 294; VNS 0.03 mg, n = 308), was performed. Adults 22 years or older with dry eye disease, Ocular Surface Disease Index score of ≥23, corneal fluorescein staining score of ≥2 in ≥1 regions/≥4 all regions, and Schirmer Test Score (STS) of ≤10 mm (no restrictions on Eye Dryness Score [EDS]) were included in this study. Efficacy was evaluated using analysis of covariance among pre-specified subgroups of mild-moderate and severe baseline disease severity defined by STS (≤5 vs. >5) and EDS (<60 vs. ≥60). Consistency of effect was evaluated by interaction tests., Results: No treatment-subgroup interactions were observed for all end points ( P > .05). The odds of achieving a ≥10-mm improvement in STS for VNS versus VC for patients with baseline STS ≤5 and >5 were 3.4(95% confidence interval, 2.0 to 5.6) and 2.3(1.3 to 4.0) and for EDS of <60 and ≥60 were 3.4(1.9 to 6.1) and 2.5(1.5 to 4.0). Least-squares mean treatment/VC differences in change from baseline in EDS for patients with baseline STS ≤5 or >5 were -7.4(95% confidence interval, -12.5 to -2.4) and -2.8(-8.7 to 3.1); EDS of <60 and ≥60 were -2.9(-8.3 to 2.5) and -8.1(-13.6 to -2.6)., Conclusions: Compared with VC, VNS improved tear production and patient-reported symptoms in patients with dry eye disease, demonstrating consistency of effect regardless of initial presenting severity., Competing Interests: Conflict of Interest Disclosure: AG, corresponding author, is an employee of and shareholder in Oyster Point Pharma, Inc., the sponsor of this study. The authors report the following conflicts of interest: JDS has consulted for the following companies: AbbVie, Alcon, Aldeyra, Allergan, Alphaeon, ArcScan, Avedro, Bausch & Lomb, BioLayer, Bio-Tissue, Bruder Healthcare, Clearside, Clearview, Clementia Pharma, Dompe, Eleven, Eyedetec, EyeGate Research, EyeRx Research, Eyevance, Glaukos, Hovione, Imprimis Pharma, InSite Vision Inc., Inspire/Merck Pharmaceuticals, Isis Pharmaceuticals, Johnson & Johnson/TearScience/Vistakon, Kala Pharmaceuticals, Kowa, LacriSciences, LayerBio, Lenstatin, Lumenis, Lux Biosciences, Mallinckrodt, Mati Therapeutics, MioTech, Neomedix, NicOx, NovaBay, Novaliq, Novartis, Noveome Biotherapeutics, OcuCure, Ocular Therapeutix, Oculis, Okogen, Omeros, Oyster Point, Parion, Pfizer, Portage, Quidel, Rapid Pathogen Screening, Rutech, Santen, Science Based Health, Senju, Shire, Sun Pharmaceuticals, Surrozen, Synedgen, Takeda, Talia Technology, Tear Solutions, TearLab, Topcon, TopiVert, and Xoma/Servier. LEO, PMK, and WOW are speakers and consultants for Oyster Point Pharma, Inc. GB, MH, LHH, AG, and MM are employees of and shareholders in Oyster Point Pharma, Inc., (Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the American Academy of Optometry.)

Background: This phase 2 study evaluated the therapeutic potential of netarsudil to reduce corneal edema and to improve vision in patients with Fuchs corneal dystrophy (FCD). Methods: Patients ( N  = 40) with baseline central corneal thickness (CCT) of ≥600 μm and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of 70-20 letters (20/40-20/400 Snellen equivalent) were randomized 1:1 to receive netarsudil once a day (QD) or twice a day (BID) for 8 weeks. Primary endpoint was mean CCT change from baseline at week 4. Results: Netarsudil QD and BID significantly reduced CCT at week 4 [mean change (standard error of mean), 28.4 (7.99) μm, P  = 0.0021; and 20.1 (8.75) μm, P  = 0.0335, respectively]. Five (12.5%) patients achieved complete resolution of corneal edema at week 4. BCVA improved by 3.2 (2.76) letters with QD and 1.5 (2.84) letters with BID, and 10 (25%) patients [5 with QD ( P  = 0.0078) and 5 with BID ( P  = 0.0096)] gained ≥10 letters at week 4. Improvements in CCT and vision were observed at week 2 and persisted at week 8, without significant differences between the 2 doses at any time point. Netarsudil QD significantly improved visual acuity and glare factor scores on the Visual Function and Corneal Health Status (V-FUCHS) questionnaire at weeks 4 and 8 (mean change, -0.4 to -0.3; P  ≤ 0.0200). Netarsudil was well tolerated. Reticular edema developed in one (2.5%) patient with BID, which resolved with treatment discontinuation. Conclusions: Netarsudil QD led to significant reductions in corneal edema as well as improvements in vision and patient-reported symptoms of glare and visual impairment in patients with FCD. Clinical Trial Registration Number: NCT04498169.

Abstract: The gut microbiome plays a substantial immunologic and pathophysiologic role in maintaining the health of the host, and dysregulation of this dynamic ecosystem has been associated with several inflammatory conditions. Many studies have explored the influence of gut microbiota on the ocular surface and whether gut microbiota impact the pathophysiology of ophthalmic conditions. These findings have highlighted the advantages of enhancing gut microbes through probiotics, prebiotics, diet, vitamin supplementations, and fecal microbial transplant in clinical practice. The purpose of this review article was to provide an up-to-date overview of the knowledge on this topic. Further exploration of this area of research is important to help guide new therapeutic targets to develop treatment and prevention of certain ocular surface diseases., Competing Interests: The authors have no funding or conflicts of interest to disclose., (Copyright © 2022 Contact Lens Association of Ophthalmologists.)

Introduction: Dry Eye Disease (DED) is defined as a multifactorial disease of the ocular surface characterized by a loss of homeostasis of the tear film, and a vicious cycle of inflammation on the ocular surface. Despite its high prevalence and standing as one of the most common eye conditions seen by practitioners, the current treatment options available to patients have not proven adequate., Areas Covered: This review will discuss the burden of DED, its pathophysiology, as well as emerging therapies. These therapies include immunosuppressants, immunomodulators, anti-inflammatory drugs, and corticosteroids. The mechanisms of these drugs will be discussed, as well as their phase of development and results from recent clinical trials. The literature search was performed using PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, ClinicalTrials.gov, and the Springer AdisInsight database., Expert Opinion: The optimal therapy for DED is associated with improved bioavailability, minimal ocular side effects, and effective dosing. The ideal treatment has not yet been established, but this paper outlines a number of promising therapies. Continued development of therapies targeting the inflammation cascade, as well as the establishment of objective markers to quantify DED severity, are important aspects in the progression of treatment.

Purpose: To assess the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of a topical water-free cyclosporine A formulation (CyclASol 0.1% ophthalmic solution) in comparison with vehicle for the treatment of dry eye disease (DED)., Methods: Three hundred twenty-eight patients were enrolled in this prospective, 12-week, multicenter, randomized, double-masked, confirmatory, vehicle-controlled clinical study. After a 2-week run-in period, eligible DED patients were randomized 1:1 to either CyclASol 0.1% or vehicle twice daily. The primary efficacy endpoint was change from baseline in total corneal fluorescein staining (National Eye Institute scale), and the second hierarchical primary efficacy endpoint was change from baseline in the Ocular Surface Disease Index score, both at 4 weeks. Secondary efficacy and safety assessments included conjunctival lissamine green staining (Oxford scale), visual analog scales for dry eye symptoms, and adverse event., Results: Treatment with CyclASol 0.1% was superior to vehicle in the primary endpoint: total corneal fluorescein staining at week 4 (Δ -0.8; 95% confidence interval, -1.3 to -0.4; P = 0.0002, analysis of covariance). This difference had already reached statistical significance after 2 weeks and was maintained throughout the study. The study did not statistically meet its second hierarchically tested primary endpoint: Ocular Surface Disease Index score (P = 0.2634). However, CyclASol 0.1% treatment showed statistically significant improvement compared with that of vehicle in the eye dryness score at week 4 (Δ -4.783; 95% confidence interval, -9.129 to -0.438; P = 0.0311)., Conclusions: CyclASol 0.1% was effective in treating signs and symptoms of DED. It significantly reduced corneal and conjunctival staining and improved ocular dryness compared with vehicle. CyclASol 0.1% was safe and showed excellent tolerability., (Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.)

Purpose: Diagnosis and management of non-infectious uveitis (NIU), a major cause of blindness worldwide, are challenging. Corticosteroids, the cornerstone of therapy, are not appropriate for long-term use, and while non-biologic and biologic immunomodulators may be used for some patients, data on their efficacy and safety in this population are limited. Repository corticotropin injection (RCI), believed to affect uveitis by multiple mechanisms, has received regulatory approval for treatment of ophthalmic diseases including posterior uveitis, but is not widely used or discussed in guidelines for the management of uveitis and ocular inflammatory diseases., Methods: The index study employed a modified Delphi process with a panel of 14 US-based ophthalmologists. Consensus recommendations were developed through a series of three questionnaires. Panellists rated statements on a Likert scale from -5 (strongly disagree) to +5 (strongly agree)., Results: The Delphi panel provided consensus recommendations on examinations and testing needed for diagnosis, treatment goals, and the use of corticosteroids, as well as the use of non-biologic and biologic immunomodulators. The panel reached consensus that RCI may be considered for posterior and pan-uveitis, and dosing should be individualized for each patient. Dose reduction/discontinuation should be considered for excessive RCI-related toxicity, hyperglycaemia and/or diabetic complications, excessive costs, or remission ≥ 2 years. Patients should be weaned from RCI if uveitis is stable and well controlled. Adverse events during RCI therapy can be managed by appropriate interventions, with dose reduction/discontinuation considered if events are severe or recurrent., Conclusions: Expert consensus suggests RCI may be an appropriate treatment option for some patients with uveitis when other therapies are ineffective or intolerable., (© 2021 Acta Ophthalmologica Scandinavica Foundation. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Introduction: Understanding antibiotic resistance and toxin profiles among staphylococcal isolates in ocular infections can aid in therapeutic management and infection prevention strategies. We evaluated in vitro antibiotic resistance patterns and molecular traits of staphylococci isolated from patients with ocular surface infections. We also report on clinical outcomes for these patients following empirical treatment with topical besifloxacin ophthalmic suspension 0.6%., Methods: This was a small observational study. Participating investigators from three clinical sites collected an initial ocular culture from the affected eye of patients presenting with ocular surface infections with presumed staphylococcal etiology. Clinical outcome data for patients with confirmed staphylococcal infections were collated later through retrospective review of patient medical records. Staphylococcal species identification in ocular cultures, in vitro antibiotic susceptibility testing, and PCR-based determination of methicillin resistance cassettes and toxin genotypes were conducted at a central laboratory. Isolates were categorized as susceptible or resistant based on systemic breakpoints, where available., Results: Cultures were collected from 43 patients, and staphylococcal infections were confirmed in 25 patients. Two isolates of Staphylococcus aureus and 27 isolates of Staphylococcus epidermidis were identified. Both S. aureus isolates were methicillin-susceptible, lacked the gene encoding Panton-Valentine leukocidin, and carried few enterotoxin genes. Eight (30%) S. epidermidis were methicillin-resistant (MRSE), and 10 (37%) were ciprofloxacin-resistant. All but two MRSE isolates demonstrated multidrug resistance (MDR), and the staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec (SCCmec) type IVa was detected in five of the eight MRSE isolates. Clinical resolution of the ocular surface infection was reported in all 25 patients following treatment with besifloxacin., Conclusions: In this study, S. aureus contained few toxins, while SCCmec IVa and MDR was predominant among MRSE from ocular surface infections. Despite significant in vitro fluoroquinolone resistance, there were no cases of treatment failure with topical besifloxacin ophthalmic suspension 0.6%., Funding: Bausch Health US, LLC.

Purpose: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of OTX-101, a novel aqueous nanomicellar formulation of cyclosporine (0.09%), in the treatment of patients with dry eye disease (DED)., Design: A randomized, multicenter, vehicle-controlled, double-masked, phase 3 clinical trial., Participants: Adults (18-90 years of age) with a history and clinical diagnosis of DED, a global symptom score of 40 or more (range, 0-100), and a lissamine green conjunctival staining score of 3 or more and 9 or less (range, 0-12) in at least 1 eye., Methods: Eligible patients entered a run-in period of 14 to 20 days in which all patients administered vehicle twice daily. Patients who remained eligible at the baseline (day 0) visit were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to twice-daily treatment with OTX-101 0.09% or vehicle for 84 days., Main Outcome Measures: Efficacy assessments included signs (unanesthetized Schirmer tear test, corneal and conjunctival staining) and symptoms (global symptom score) of DED. The primary end point was the proportion of eyes with a clinically meaningful improvement (increase of ≥10 mm) in Schirmer test score at day 84. Safety evaluations included adverse events (AEs), visual acuity, and intraocular pressure monitoring, slit-lamp, dilated ophthalmoscopy, and fundus examinations., Results: A total of 744 patients were randomized and received study medication (371 to OTX-101 0.09% and 373 to vehicle). The primary end point was achieved; a significantly greater percentage of eyes in the OTX-101 0.09% treatment group achieved an increase of 10 mm or more in the Schirmer test score at day 84 (OTX-101 0.09%, 16.6%; vehicle, 9.2%; P < 0.001). Significant improvements relative to vehicle also were observed for corneal (days 28, 56, and 84) and conjunctival (days 56 and 84) staining. The global symptom score was reduced from baseline in both treatment groups by approximately 30%; however, no significant separation between groups was observed. The OTX-101 0.09% formulation was well tolerated. Treatment-emergent AEs were primarily mild in intensity., Conclusions: Clinically and statistically significant improvements in tear production and ocular surface integrity were observed in patients treated with OTX-101 0.09% for DED., (Copyright © 2019 American Academy of Ophthalmology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

In the original publication, units were incorrectly published in the results section as micrograms (µg/mL).

Purpose : To analyse pooled data from 2 similar phase 3 noninferiority studies comparing difluprednate 0.05% versus prednisolone acetate 1% in patients with endogenous anterior uveitis. Methods : Patients received difluprednate alternating with vehicle or prednisolone acetate for 14 days (8 drops/day in both groups), followed by tapering from day 14 to 28. All patients were observed until day 42. Results : More patients on difluprednate than on prednisolone acetate were cleared of anterior chamber cells on day twenty one (71.3% vs 54.7%; p  = 0.02); results were similar at the other time points. Treatment withdrawals were higher with prednisolone acetate than difluprednate (19.8% vs 7.4%; log-rank p  = 0.02). Study discontinuation due to lack of efficacy was also higher with prednisolone acetate than difluprednate (14.0% vs 0%; p  = 0.0002 [pre-specified exploratory analysis]). Conclusions : More difluprednate-treated eyes were quiet following 21 days of treatment, and difluprednate-treated patients were much less likely to be withdrawn from the study because of treatment failure.

Purpose: The intranasal tear neurostimulator (ITN) activates the nasolacrimal pathway, which is involved with basal and bolus tear secretion. These studies characterized the acute and long-term effectiveness of the ITN in stimulating tear production in subjects with dry eye disease (DED)., Methods: Study 1: Randomized, double-masked, dual-controlled, 1-day crossover. Study 2: Single-arm, open-label, 180-day prospective cohort. Eligible subjects had basal unstimulated Schirmer test (with anesthesia) ≤10 mm and intranasal cotton swab-stimulated Schirmer test at least 7 mm greater in the same eye, and Ocular Surface Disease Index ® ≥13 and ≥ 23, in Studies 1 and 2, respectively. Study 1: Subjects (n = 48) received three randomized test applications: active intranasal, extranasal (active control), and sham intranasal (inactive control) stimulation, 3 min/application with 1-hour minimum between applications. Primary outcome measure was the difference in Schirmer test scores during active intranasal and control applications. Study 2: Subjects (n = 97) performed intranasal neurostimulation for ≤3 min/application, 2-10 times/day. Primary outcome measure was the difference in Schirmer scores (stimulated minus unstimulated) at day 180. Both studies recorded device-related adverse events (AEs)., Results: Study 1: Schirmer scores (mean ± SEM) were significantly greater (p < 0.0001) with active intranasal (25.3 ± 1.5 mm) vs extranasal (9.5 ± 1.2 mm) and sham (9.2 ± 1.1 mm) applications. Study 2: Schirmer scores were significantly greater (p < 0.0001) with ITN stimulation vs unstimulated at day 180 (17.3 ± 1.3 mm vs 7.9 ± 0.7 mm). No serious device-related AEs were reported in either study., Conclusion: The ITN was well-tolerated and effective in stimulating tear production with acute and long-term use in DED. CLINICALTRIALS., Gov Identifier: NCT02680158 and NCT02526290., (Copyright © 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Adenoviral conjunctivitis comprises a large number of physician office visits in the United States and places a great financial burden on health care. It is estimated that the incidence of adenovirus infection to be as high as 20 million cases per year in the United States. There are multiple adenovirus serotypes, each associated with different types and severity of infection. Ocular manifestations of adenovirus include epidemic keratoconjunctivitis, pharyngoconjunctival fever, and nonspecific conjunctivitis. Adenoviral conjunctivitis is primarily a clinical diagnosis. Laboratory diagnosis is available although until recently rarely used. At present, there is no established or approved specific effective drug against adenovirus. Treatment is primarily supportive and includes artificial tears and cool compresses. Topical antibiotics are only indicated if a bacterial coinfection is suspected or in high-risk patients such as children. Prevention against this extremely contagious disease is of utmost importance. Although most cases are self-limited and have a relatively benign course, permanent visual disability can occur. For this reason, it is imperative that all eye care providers are capable of diagnosing and effectively treating these patients, and also preventing the spread of this contagious disease to others.

Introduction: Little is known of the ocular distribution characteristics of currently branded non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) in the United States. This study was designed to predict the ocular bioavailability characteristics in humans using Dutch Belted rabbits as a surrogate. Commercially available, topically-applied NSAIDs containing bromfenac or nepafenac/amfenac were evaluated., Methods: 126 healthy adult Dutch Belted rabbits were randomly assigned to three treatment cohorts (BromSite ® twice daily [BID] in the right eye, BromSite ® once daily [QD] in the right eye, Prolensa ® QD in the right eye and Ilevro™ QD in the left eye) and 7 post-dosing time points (0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 24 h after final instillation). The study eyes received 40 µL of the assigned drug for a consecutive 9 days. Samples of aqueous humor, iris-ciliary body, choroid, sclera, and retina were harvested from the study eyes at the assigned time point after the last dose on the 9th day. NSAID content in ocular tissues was analyzed using high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), and area under the curve (AUC 0.5-24h ), maximum concentration (C max ), and time to maximum concentration (T max ) were determined., Results: Peak NSAID concentrations were reached within 1-3 h in the anterior segment and within 1-3 h in the posterior segment after last dose. Throughout the ocular tissues, both AUC and C max for BromSite ® (BID and QD) were consistently higher than respective NSAID concentrations of Prolensa ® QD and Ilevro ® QD. When comparing BromSite ® BID to QD, the BID regimen produced generally higher but statistically similar bromfenac concentrations throughout the ocular tissues except in the aqueous humor and iris-ciliary body, where the AUC BID was statistically significantly higher with BromSite ® BID., Conclusion: As a surrogate to human ocular bioavailability, BromSite ® demonstrated significantly greater NSAID compared to Prolensa ® QD and Ilevro ® QD. The DuraSite ® component of BromSite ® appears to enhance ocular penetration throughout both anterior and posterior tissues., Funding: Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd.

Introduction: Topical corticosteroids are an important pharmacotherapy for the management of various inflammatory conditions affecting the anterior segment of the eye. However, medications in this class are associated with well-known risks including increased intraocular pressure (IOP) and development of cataracts. The topical corticosteroid loteprednol etabonate (LE) was developed with the specific intention of minimizing these side effects., Areas Covered: The focus of this review is to examine published efficacy and safety data for LE, a drug engineered to undergo rapid metabolism to inactive metabolites with the goal of improved safety. Two decades of clinical research focused on LE formulations are reviewed, including the use of LE in combination with tobramycin. The cumulative body of experience affirms the concept that the molecular design of LE confers certain safety benefits without compromising the desired anti-inflammatory efficacy of a topical corticosteroid., Expert Opinion: Loteprednol etabonate is a mainstay for topical therapy of a wide variety of commonplace and niche conditions of the ocular surface and the anterior segment, including in the healing post-operative patient. Its versatility and safety allow eye care providers to recommend both acute induction as well as chronic maintenance therapy with appropriate follow-up.

The undesirable flavor compounds diacetyl and 2,3-pentanedione are vicinal diketones (VDKs) formed by extracellular oxidative decarboxylation of intermediate metabolites of the isoleucine, leucine and valine (ILV) biosynthetic pathway. These VDKs are taken up by Saccharomyces and enzymatically converted to acetoin and 3-hydroxy-2-pentanone, respectively. Purification of a highly enriched diacetyl reductase fraction from Saccharomyces cerevisiae in conjunction with mass spectrometry identified Old Yellow Enzyme (Oye) as an enzyme capable of catalyzing VDK reduction. Kinetic analysis of recombinant Oye1p, Oye2p and Oye3p isoforms confirmed that all three isoforms reduced diacetyl and 2,3-pentanedione in an NADPH-dependent reaction. Transcriptomic analysis of S. cerevisiae (ale) and S. pastorianus (lager) yeast during industrial fermentations showed that the transcripts for OYE1, OYE2, arabinose dehydrogenase (ARA1), α-acetolactate synthase (ILV2) and α-acetohydroxyacid reductoisomerase (ILV5) were differentially regulated in a manner that correlated with changes in extracellular levels of VDKs. These studies provide insights into the mechanism for reducing VDKs and decreasing maturation times of beer which are of commercial importance., (© FEMS 2016. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Corticosteroids are a mainstay therapeutic option for the treatment of ocular inflammation. However, safety remains a concern for clinicians, particularly with long-term use. Though highly effective at suppressing inflammatory and allergic responses, topical ophthalmic corticosteroids carry an inherent risk of side effects, including elevated intraocular pressure (IOP), a risk factor for the development of glaucoma. The corticosteroid loteprednol etabonate (LE) contains an ester rather than a ketone at the C-20 position, minimizing the potential for side effects, including IOP elevation. In early pivotal clinical trials of LE ophthalmic suspension for conjunctivitis (allergic, giant papillary), anterior uveitis, and post-operative inflammation, LE had minimal impact on IOP over short-term (<28 days) and long-term (≥28 days) use. Since then, new LE formulations-including a gel, an ointment, and a suspension of LE in combination with tobramycin-have become commercially available. Multiple studies evaluating the safety and efficacy of LE for inflammatory conditions have been reported, including those requiring longer-term treatment such as photorefractive keratectomy, corneal transplantation, and dry eye disease. We review the available published data on the effect of LE on IOP and report on the cumulative incidence of clinically significant IOP elevations (≥10 mm Hg from baseline) with short-term and long-term LE use. In all studies, LE consistently demonstrated a low propensity to elevate IOP, regardless of formulation, dosage regimen, or treatment duration, including in known steroid responders. The cumulative proportion of patients exhibiting clinically significant IOP increases was 0.8% (14/1725 subjects) in studies evaluating short-term LE treatment and 1.5% (21/1386 subjects) in long-term studies. Furthermore, use of LE was associated with significantly lower rates of IOP elevation ≥10 mm Hg as compared to prednisolone acetate or dexamethasone (when used in combination with tobramycin). The cumulative data to date substantiates a favorable IOP-safety profile for LE with both short-term and long-term use.

Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of phenylephrine 1.0%-ketorolac 0.3% (Omidria) for maintenance of mydriasis during, and reduction of ocular pain after, cataract surgery., Setting: Twenty centers in the United States and the Netherlands., Design: Prospective randomized clinical trials., Methods: Patients having cataract surgery or refractive lens exchange were enrolled in 2 clinical trials. Phenylephrine 1.0%-ketorolac 0.3% or placebo was added to irrigation solution and administered intracamerally during the procedure. Integrated analyses of primary and secondary endpoints were conducted., Results: The clinical trials comprised 808 patients (403 treatment and 405 placebo). Phenylephrine 1.0%-ketorolac 0.3% was superior to placebo for the maintenance of mydriasis during, and reduction of ocular pain following, cataract surgery. The mean area under the curve (AUC) change from baseline in pupil diameter was 0.08 mm for treatment compared with -0.50 mm for placebo (P < .0001). The mean AUC of ocular pain visual analog scale scores within 12 hours postoperatively was 4.16 mm for the treatment group and 9.06 mm for the placebo group (P < .001). Results of all secondary efficacy analyses demonstrated a significant treatment effect associated with phenylephrine 1.0%-ketorolac 0.3%. Treatment-emergent adverse events were as expected for a population having cataract surgery; no clinically significant differences in safety measures were observed between treatment groups., Conclusion: In this integrated analysis, phenylephrine 1.0%-ketorolac 0.3% administered intracamerally with irrigation solution during cataract surgery was safe and effective for maintaining mydriasis during the procedure and reducing postoperative ocular pain., Financial Disclosure: Dr. Schaaf is an employee and holds an equity interest in Omeros Corporation. Drs. Hovanesian, Sheppard, Trattler, Gayton, and Ng are consultants to Omeros Corporation. No other author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned., (Copyright © 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Acute postoperative endophthalmitis (APE) is a serious, although infrequent, complication of eye surgery that can result in significant morbidity and costs. This review addresses APE risk factors, associated bacterial pathogens, antibiotic resistance, and prevention., (Copyright © 2014 American Academy of Ophthalmology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: The purpose of this work was to evaluate the effect of loteprednol etabonate (LE) before the initiation of topical cyclosporine A (tCsA) therapy in patients with mild-to-moderate dry eye disease. Prospective, multicenter randomized double-masked parallel group clinical study (NCT00407043)., Methods: Hundred and eighteen patients with dry eye disease were randomized to receive either LE and tCsA (n=61) or artificial tears (AT) and tCsA (n=57). Hundred and twelve patients completed the study (LE: n=57, AT: n=55) and are included in the data analysis. Patients self-administered either LE or AT for 2 weeks 4 times per day, followed by tCsA twice per day accompanied by either LE twice per day or AT twice per day for an additional 6 weeks of treatment. Primary outcome measures included the Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) questionnaire, the Likert scale using standardized facial expressions, lissamine green staining, fluorescein staining, and the Schirmer test. Additional measures included global self-assessment, and safety outcomes included slitlamp examination, intraocular pressure, and assessment of visual acuity., Results: Loteprednol etabonate pretreatment significantly reduced tCsA stinging (P<0.05). Both groups showed significantly improved OSDI scores at the 14-, 30-, and 60-day visits. Loteprednol etabonate showed significantly more OSDI improvement than AT. Both pretreatment strategies improved global self-assessment scores, Schirmer test, fluorescein staining, lissamine staining, and adjunctive AT use. Loteprednol etabonate showed superior improvement in Schirmer test, fluorescein staining, and lissamine staining. Intraocular pressure did not increase in either group., Conclusions: Loteprednol etabonate induction therapy 2 weeks before the initiation of long-term tCsA treatment for chronic dry eye disease provides more rapid relief of dry eye signs and symptoms with greater efficacy than tCsA and AT alone.

Purpose: Endogenous anterior uveitis (AU), when untreated, may lead to vision loss. This study compared the safety and efficacy of difluprednate versus prednisolone acetate for the treatment of this condition., Methods: This phase III, double-masked, noninferiority study randomized patients with mild to moderate endogenous AU to receive difluprednate 0.05% (n = 56) four times daily, alternating with vehicle four times daily, or prednisolone acetate 1% (n = 54) eight times daily. The 14-day treatment period was followed by a 14-day dose-tapering period and a 14-day observation period. The primary efficacy end point was change in anterior chamber cell grade (range, 0 for ≤1 cell to 4 for >50 cells) from baseline to day 14., Results: At day 14, the mean change in anterior chamber cell grade with difluprednate was noninferior to that with prednisolone acetate (-2.2 vs. -2.0, P = 0.16). The proportions of difluprednate-treated patients versus prednisolone acetate-treated patients demonstrating complete clearing of anterior chamber cells at day 3 were 13.0% vs. 2.1% (P = 0.046) and at day 21 were 73.9% vs. 63.8% (P = 0.013). A significant between-group difference in the mean IOP increase was seen at day 3 (2.5 mm Hg for difluprednate-treated patients and 0.1 mm Hg for prednisolone acetate-treated patients, P = 0.0013) but not at other time points. The mean IOP values in both groups remained less than 21 mm Hg throughout the study., Conclusions: Difluprednate 0.05% four times daily is well tolerated and is noninferior to prednisolone acetate 1% eight times daily for the treatment of endogenous AU. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01201798.).

Purpose: To assess the efficacy and safety of lifitegrast ophthalmic solution 5.0% compared with placebo in subjects with dry eye disease., Design: Prospective, randomized, double-masked, placebo-controlled, parallel arm, multicenter clinical trial., Participants: A total of 588 adult subjects with dry eye disease., Methods: Eligible subjects were randomized 1:1 to receive topically administered lifitegrast (5.0%) or placebo (vehicle) twice daily for 84 days after a 14-day open-label placebo run-in period. After enrollment (day 0), subjects were evaluated at days 14, 42, and 84. Key objective (fluorescein and lissamine staining scores [Ora scales]) and subjective (Ocular Surface Disease Index [OSDI], 7-item visual analog scale, and ocular discomfort score [Ora scale]) measures were assessed at all visits., Main Outcome Measures: The primary objective efficacy measure (sign) was mean change from baseline inferior corneal staining score (ICSS) at day 84. The co-primary subjective efficacy measure (symptom) was the mean change from baseline in the visual-related function subscale score of the Ocular Surface Disease Index (VR-OSDI). Supportive measures included corneal fluorescein scores (superior, central, total region) and conjunctival lissamine scores (nasal, temporal, total region) and symptom scores at day 84., Results: The study met the primary objective efficacy ICSS end point in demonstrating superiority of lifitegrast compared with placebo (P = 0.0007). Lifitegrast significantly reduced corneal fluorescein staining (superior, P = 0.0392; total cornea, P = 0.0148) and conjunctival lissamine staining (nasal, P = 0.0039; total conjunctiva, P = 0.0086) at day 84 versus placebo. Significant (P < 0.05) improvements in nasal and total lissamine scores were observed at day 14 and maintained through day 84. The study did not meet the co-primary subjective VR-OSDI measure (P = 0.7894). However, significant improvements were observed at day 84 in ocular discomfort (P = 0.0273) and eye dryness (P = 0.0291), the most common and severe symptoms reported at baseline in both groups. There were no unanticipated or serious ocular adverse events (AEs). The most frequent reported ocular AEs were transient intermittent instillation site symptoms (irritation, discomfort) primarily on the initial lifitegrast dose at day 0., Conclusions: Lifitegrast ophthalmic solution 5.0% significantly reduced corneal fluorescein and conjunctival lissamine staining and improved symptoms of ocular discomfort and eye dryness compared with placebo when administered twice daily over 84 days., (Copyright © 2014 American Academy of Ophthalmology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Supplementation with gamma-linolenic acid (GLA) and omega-3 (n-3) polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) has been found to decrease the production of disease-relevant inflammatory mediators that are implicated in the pathogenesis of chronic dry eye. This study evaluated the effect of a supplement containing both GLA and n-3 PUFAs on signs and symptoms of moderate-to-severe keratoconjunctivitis sicca in postmenopausal patients., Methods: This multicenter, double-masked placebo-controlled clinical trial enrolled 38 patients (both eyes) with tear dysfunction who were randomized to supplemental GLA + n-3 PUFAs or placebo for 6 months. Disease parameters, including Ocular Surface Disease Index, Schirmer test, tear breakup time, conjunctival fluorescein and lissamine green staining, and topographic corneal smoothness indexes (surface asymmetry index and surface regularity index), were assessed at baseline and at 4, 12, and 24 weeks. The intensity of dendritic cell CD11c integrin and HLA-DR expression was measured in conjunctival impression cytologies., Results: The Ocular Surface Disease Index score improved with supplementation and was significantly lower than placebo (21 ± 4 vs. 34 ± 5) after 24 weeks (P = 0.05, n = 19 per group). The surface asymmetry index was significantly lower in supplement-treated subjects (0.37 ± 0.03, n = 15) than placebo (0.51 ± 0.03, n = 16) at 24 weeks (P = 0.005). Placebo treatment also significantly increased HLA-DR intensity by 36% ± 9% and CD11c by 34% ± 7% when compared with supplement treatment (n = 19 per group, P = 0.001, 24 weeks). Neither treatment had any effect on tear production, tear breakup time, or corneal or conjunctival staining., Conclusions: Supplemental GLA and n-3 PUFAs for 6 months improved ocular irritation symptoms, maintained corneal surface smoothness, and inhibited conjunctival dendritic cell maturation in patients with postmenopausal keratoconjunctivitis sicca.Clinical Trial Registration-URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00883649.

Purpose: To assess the prevalence of hypotony in patients with severe forms of uveitis., Methods: The Multicenter Uveitis Steroid Treatment (MUST) Trial, a randomized study, enrolled 255 patients. Patients with hypotony at the baseline visit were identified., Results: Twenty (8.3%) of 240 patients with sufficient data had hypotony. Hypotony was more common in patients with uveitis ≥5 years duration (odds ratio [OR] = 5.0; p < .01), and in eyes with a history of ocular surgery (vitrectomy vs. none, OR = 3.1; p = .03). Hypotony was less in patients with older age of uveitis onset (>51 years vs. <51 years, OR = 0.1; p = .02), in Caucasian patients (OR = 0.1; p < .01) compared to African American patients. Hypotonous eyes were more likely to have visual impairment (OR = 22.9; p < .01)., Conclusions: Hypotony is an important complication of uveitis and more commonly affects African-American patients, those with uveitis onset at a younger age, and those with longer disease duration. It is associated with visual impairment.

Purpose: To describe visual acuity (VA) and inflammation following cataract surgery in eyes with noninfectious posterior uveitis (NIPU) that were being treated with a fluocinolone acetonide (FA) intravitreal implant compared with those that were not., Design: Post hoc, subgroup analysis of data from a 3-year, dose-masked, randomized, multicenter trial evaluating the FA implant for the treatment of NIPU., Participants and Controls: The subset of eyes that underwent cataract surgery during the 3-year trial. Eyes were either implanted with a 0.59- or a 2.1-mg FA implant, or, in the case of affected fellow eyes, received standard-of-care local treatment., Main Outcome Measures: VA, anterior and posterior chamber inflammation at 1 and 3 months after surgery, and rate of uveitis recurrence and serious postoperative ocular adverse events., Results: Of 278 patients enrolled in the main trial, 132/142 phakic implanted eyes and 39/186 phakic non-implanted eyes underwent cataract surgery. Mean improvement in VA was significantly greater in implanted than non-implanted eyes at 1 (P = 0.0047) and 3 months (P = 0.0015) postoperatively; significantly fewer anterior chamber cells were seen in implanted than non-implanted eyes at 1 (P = 0.0084) and 3 months (P = 0.0002). Severity of vitreous haze was less in implanted than non-implanted eyes at 3 months postoperatively (P = 0.0005). The postsurgical uveitis recurrence rate was lower in implanted than non-implanted eyes (26.5% vs 44.4%; P = 0.0433). Glaucoma was reported in 19.7% of implanted eyes and no non-implanted eyes (P = 0.0008) postoperatively., Conclusion: In this post hoc subgroup analysis, eyes with NIPU treated with the FA intravitreal implant demonstrated better vision and less intraocular inflammation following cataract surgery than non-implanted eyes. Recurrent uveitic inflammation did not appear to be triggered by cataract surgery. Glaucoma occurred more frequently in implanted eyes.

Purpose: Lacritin is a novel human tear glycoprotein that promotes basal tear peroxidase secretion by rat lacrimal acinar cells in vitro. This study investigates whether lacritin is prosecretory when added topically to the ocular surface of normal living rabbits, and if so, what is its efficacy and tolerability versus cyclosporine and artificial tears., Methods: Purified recombinant human lacritin (1, 10, 50, or 100 μg/mL), inactive lacritin truncation mutant C-25 (10 μg/mL), cyclosporine (0.05%), or artificial tears were topically administered to eyes of normal New Zealand White rabbits either as a single dose or three times daily for 14 days with monitoring of basal tear production. Basal tearing under proparacaine anesthesia was repeatedly assessed throughout and 1 week after chronic treatment ceased. Eyes were examined weekly by slit-lamp biomicroscopy., Results: Lacritin acutely increased basal tearing to 30% over vehicle at 240 minutes. Three times daily treatment with 10-100 μg/mL lacritin was well tolerated. Basal tearing became progressively elevated 4, 7, and 14 days later and was 50% over baseline (50 μg/mL lacritin) 1 week after treatment had ceased. Cyclosporine elevated tearing to a similar level on days 4 and 7 but had little or no effect on day 14 and had returned to baseline 1 week after ending treatment. C-25 and artificial tears had no effect., Conclusions: Lacritin acutely stimulates basal tear flow that is sustained for at least 240 minutes. Two weeks of lacritin treatment three times daily was well tolerated and progressively elevated the basal tear flow. One week after treatment ended, basal tearing was still 50% over baseline. In contrast, cyclosporine triggered mild to moderate corneal irritation and a temporary elevation in tearing.

Purpose: This retrospective, clinical comparative analysis describes differences in clinical signs and symptoms and medication tolerability between those patients who receive topical corticosteroids prior to initiation of topical cyclosporine 0.5% emulsion (tCSA) therapy for chronic dry eye disease (CDED) and those who received tCSA and were not first induced with corticosteroid drops. tCSA is the only approved medication for CDED. Stinging is the most common side effect of tCSA and reason for tCSA discontinuation. This analysis describes an effective pharmacologic means to reduce tCSA stinging and subsequent discontinuation., Methods: Thirty-six consecutive patients were initially treated with loteprednol etabonate (LE) 0.5% (Lotemax; Bausch & Lomb) for a period ranging from 2 to 16 months prior to institution of concomitant tCSA (Restasis™; Allergan). Clinical parameters (fluorescein staining, conjunctival redness, tear meniscus) were compared over a period of 6 months to a second cohort of 36 consecutive patients who were initially prescribed continuous tCSA without concomitant LE pretreatment. Patients in the LE pretreatment group discontinued LE after 3-6 months of concomitant therapy while continuing tCSA therapy., Results: Of the 36 LE pretreatment patients, only 2 developed significant stinging (5.5%) and 1 discontinued the use of tCSA because of stinging (2.8%). Of the patients without LE pretreatment, 8 developed stinging (22%) and 3 discontinued tCSA as a result (8.3%). The intergroup P value was significant for severe stinging (<0.02) and for tCSA discontinuation because of severe stinging (<0.04). Patients in the LE pretreatment group had no statistically significant differences in preenrollment disease severity or demographics (P range from 0.19 to 0.59) compared with the group without pretreatment., Conclusion: Topical corticosteroid preparation of the ocular surface in CDED with LE induction therapy may reduce discomfort from subsequent long-term maintenance topical medications, particularly tCSA. This analysis describes a readily available induction and maintenance pharmacologic strategy to reduce tCSA stinging and subsequent discontinuation.

Over 50% of patients who seek treatment for allergies present with ocular symptoms. Our current ability to control ocular allergic symptoms is greater than ever before. Newer dual-acting topical eyedrops attack multiple facets of the allergic cascade. Azelastine has antihistaminic effects providing immediate relief, mast cell stabilization providing early-phase intervention, and inhibition of expression and activation of anti-inflammatory mediators which characterize the late phase of the immune reaction. The ophthalmic eyedrop formulation is approved for treatment of allergic conjunctivitis in adults and children aged over 3 years. In clinical trials comparing azelastine with other dual-acting eyedrops, such as levocabastine and olopatadine, azelastine was reported to be slightly less efficacious and to sting briefly upon administration. Even so, many patients experienced the full benefit of symptom relief, and preferred azelastine. As a broad-spectrum drug, azelastine offers many desirable properties for management of ocular allergies. Because it can often produce maximal effect with just twice-daily dosing, azelastine is a particularly good choice for the allergic population in whom minimizing exposure to topical products and preservatives is a key concern.

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of adjunctive treatments to decrease herpes simplex keratitis (HSK) recurrences in patients with simultaneous stromal HSK and dry eye disease., Methods: This was a nonrandomized, single-center, retrospective, comparative analysis. Forty-two patients were diagnosed with unilateral HSK and dry eye disease. Of the 42 patients, 22 were treated with ipsilateral punctal occlusion by thermal cautery and 10 were treated with topical administration of cyclosporine, 0.05%, ophthalmic emulsion twice a day. Another group of 10 patients had previously undergone punctal occlusion and had cyclosporine ophthalmic emulsion twice a day added. All patients continued the use of oral acyclovir or valacyclovir hydrochloride and topical steroids. The frequency and duration of HSK recurrences were monitored for 1 year after initiation of treatment, and the rates were compared with those in the prior year., Results: The thermal cautery and topical cyclosporine groups experienced HSK recurrences for mean durations of 7.1 and 5.8 mo/y before treatment, respectively, and these were reduced to 1.1 mo/y after treatment in both groups. Topical administration of cyclosporine further reduced the duration of HSK recurrences in patients with prior thermal cautery from an average of 1.3 mo/y before the addition of cyclosporine to 0.8 mo/y after the addition of cyclosporine., Conclusion: Permanent punctal occlusion by thermal cautery and the use of topical cyclosporine independently reduced recurrences of stromal HSK.

Objective: This study compares the effect of topical versus intravenous (IV) administration of synthetic WIN 55-212-2 (WIN) or timolol on intraocular pressure (IOP)., Methods: WIN or timolol were administered either topically or by IV in normotensive New Zealand white rabbits. IOP was measured at baseline and 30, 60, and 120 min after administration (n = 4 per group). Blood pressure (BP) and heart rate (HR) were measured concomitantly with IOP., Results: IV administration of 0.1 mg/kg WIN reduced IOP by 30% after 30 min, which continued to decline for up to 120 min. Timolol injection (25 mu g/kg) also reduced IOP by 25% after 30 min but was not sustained. In comparison, both topical WIN (1.0%) and timolol (0.5%) reduced IOP by 20% from baseline after 30 min. IV injection of either WIN or timolol significantly reduced HR to 155.4 +/- 11.4 bpm and 165.9 +/- 11.1 bpm, respectively, from a baseline of 256.3 +/- 9.9 bpm. Topical administration was well tolerated and did not affect behavior, BP, or HR., Conclusion: Topical administration of either WIN or timolol did not decrease IOP as much as IV administration, but the lack of systemic or local toxicity could make it the safer alternative.

Purpose: Ocular Tracking Resistance in U.S. Today (TRUST) annually evaluates in vitro antimicrobial susceptibility of Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus pneumoniae, and Haemophilus influenzae to ciprofloxacin, gatifloxacin, levofloxacin, moxifloxacin, penicillin, azithromycin, tobramycin, trimethoprim, and polymyxin B in national samples of ocular isolates., Design: Laboratory investigation., Methods: Prospectively collected ocular isolates (197 S. aureus, 49 S. pneumoniae, and 32 H. influenzae) from 35 institutions and archived ocular isolates (760 S. pneumoniae and 356 H. influenzae) from 34 institutions were tested by an independent, central laboratory. Mean minimum inhibitory concentrations that would inhibit growth of 90% of the tested isolates (MIC(90)) were interpreted as susceptible, intermediate, or resistant according to standardized breakpoints for systemic treatment. S. aureus isolates were classified as methicillin susceptible (MSSA) or methicillin resistant (MRSA)., Results: MSSA or MRSA susceptibility patterns were virtually identical for the fluoroquinolones, that is, MSSA susceptibility was 79.9% to 81.1% and MRSA susceptibility was 15.2%. Trimethoprim was the only agent tested with high activity against MRSA. All S. pneumoniae isolates were susceptible to gatifloxacin, levofloxacin, and moxifloxacin; 89.8% were susceptible to ciprofloxacin. H. influenzae isolates were 100% susceptible to all tested agents but trimethoprim. Ocular TRUST 1 data were consistent with the eight-year longitudinal sample of archived ocular isolates., Conclusions: The fluoroquinolones were consistently active in MSSA, S. pneumoniae, and H. influenzae. After more than a decade of intensive ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin use as systemic therapy, 100% of ocular S. pneumoniae isolates were susceptible to gatifloxacin, levofloxacin, and moxifloxacin; nonsusceptibility to ciprofloxacin was less than 15%. High-level in vitro MRSA resistance suggests the need to consider alternative therapy to fluoroquinolones when MRSA is a likely pathogen.

An alpha,beta-dicarbonyl reductase activity was purified from Saccharomyces cerevisiae and identified as the cytosolic enzyme D-Arabinose dehydrogenase (ARA1) by MALDI-TOF/TOF. Size exclusion chromatography analysis of recombinant Ara1p revealed that this protein formed a homodimer. Ara1p catalyzed the reduction of the reactive alpha,beta-dicarbonyl compounds methylglyoxal, diacetyl, and pentanedione in a NADPH dependant manner. Ara1p had apparent Km values of approximately 14 mM, 7 mM and 4 mM for methylglyoxal, diacetyl and pentanedione respectively, with corresponding turnover rates of 4.4, 6.9 and 5.9 s(-1) at pH 7.0. pH profiling showed that Ara1p had a pH optimum of 4.5 for the diacetyl reduction reaction. Ara1p also catalyzed the NADP+ dependant oxidation of acetoin; however this back reaction only occurred at alkaline pH values. That Ara1p was important for degradation of alpha,beta-dicarbonyl substrates was further supported by the observation that ara1-Delta knockout yeast mutants exhibited a decreased growth rate phenotype in media containing diacetyl.

Purpose: Long-term evaluation of dihematoporphyrin ether (DHE) safety and efficacy as photodynamic therapy (PDT) for patients with corneal neovascularization (KNV)., Design: Prospective multi-center interventional case series., Methods: Seven patients were enrolled after Institutional Review Board approval and a detailed informed consent were obtained. Eligible patients presented with clinically stable KNV without active vessel progression or inflammation. All patients with severe hypertension, history of renal or hepatic disease, or sensitivity to porphyrins, and those with active keratitis or uncontrolled ocular surface disease were excluded. DHE was administered as an intravenous bolus (2 mg/kg). Seventy-two hours later, PDT was carried out using argon green laser (514 nm). The main outcome measure, extent of vascular thrombosis, was estimated during postoperative follow-up examinations performed at day 1, 1 week, 6 months, and up to 12 years postoperative., Results: All patients obtained an immediate reduction in measurable corneal vascularization. With at least 6 months of follow-up, six of seven patients maintained a significant reduction (52.5% +/- 19.6%, P < .01) in KNV. The mean length of followup was 5.4 years (Range = 6 months to 12 years) during which time there were no other ocular changes attributable to laser treatment. Three patients suffered significant systemic short-term phototoxicity reactions., Conclusions: Intravenous DHE followed by photodynamic treatment in humans is effective for the reduction of inactive, established KNV. However, the significant short-term adverse effects related to systemic administration of this drug are of particular concern and warrant further investigation.