Search

Abstract Background Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) have been shown to provide cardiovascular benefits in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). However, their cardiovascular protective efficacy in high-risk T2DM patients, particularly those with a history of cardiovascular events or severe chronic kidney disease, remains uncertain. Methods A comprehensive search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and The Cochrane Library to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated the effects of GLP-1 RAs on cardiovascular outcomes in high-risk patients with T2DM. A random-effects model was used to calculate pooled hazard ratios (HRs) for cardiovascular outcomes. Subgroup analyses and GRADE assessment were also performed. Results Nine RCTs involving 63,613 patients were included. GLP-1 RAs significantly reduced the risk of the primary composite outcome (HR: 0.86, 95% CI: 0.80–0.92), cardiovascular death (HR: 0.85, 95% CI: 0.78–0.93), all-cause death (HR: 0.87, 95% CI: 0.82–0.93), myocardial infarction (HR: 0.90, 95% CI: 0.82–0.98), stroke (HR: 0.85, 95% CI: 0.77–0.95), and heart failure (HF) hospitalization (HR: 0.90, 95% CI: 0.83–0.97). No significant difference in unstable angina (UA) hospitalization was observed (HR: 1.04, 95% CI: 0.95–1.15). Subgroup analyses indicated greater benefits with combination therapy, particularly in patients with chronic kidney disease. The quality of evidence was rated as “High” for six outcomes and “Moderate” for UA hospitalization. Conclusions GLP-1 RAs significantly reduce cardiovascular risk in high-risk T2DM patients, especially with combination therapy and in those with chronic kidney disease. However, further research is needed to confirm their long-term effects.

BackgroundCatheter ablation (CA) effectively treats atrial fibrillation (AF) in heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), improving clinical outcomes. However, its benefits for AF patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) are still unclear.MethodsWe systematically searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, and Scopus for studies investigating outcomes of CA in AF patients with HFpEF. Efficacy indicators included freedom from AF and antiarrhythmic drugs (AAD) free AF elimination. Safety indicators comprised total complications, HF admission, all-cause admission, and all-cause mortality. Sixteen studies with 20,796 patients included in our research.ResultsThe comprehensive analysis demonstrated that, when comparing CA with medical therapy in HFpEF, no significant differences were observed in terms of HF admissions, all-cause admissions, and all-cause mortality [(OR: 0.42; 95% CI: 0.12–1.51, P = 0.19), (HR: 0.78; 95% CI: 0.48–1.27, P = 0.31), and (OR: 1.10; 95% CI: 0.83–1.44, P = 0.51)], while freedom from AF was significantly higher in CA (OR: 5.88; 95% CI: 2.99–11.54, P