Search

INTRODUCTION In good risk patients (historic inhibitor peak

Introduction Severe haemophilia A (HA) has a major impact on health‐related quality of life (HRQoL). Aim Assess the impact of emicizumab on HRQoL in persons with severe HA (PwHA) without factor VIII (FVIII) inhibitors in the phase 3 HAVEN 3 and 4 studies. Methods This pooled analysis examines the HRQoL of PwHA aged ≥ 18 years treated with emicizumab prophylaxis via Haemophilia‐Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire for Adults (Haem‐A‐QoL) and EuroQoL 5‐Dimensions 5‐levels (EQ‐5D‐5L). In particular, changes from baseline in Haem‐A‐QoL ‘Physical Health’ (PH) domain and ‘Total Score’ (TS) are evaluated. Results Among 176 evaluable participants, 96 (55%) had received prior episodic treatment and 80 (45%) prophylaxis; 70% had ≥ 1 target joint and 51% had experienced ≥ 9 bleeds in the previous 24 weeks. Mean Haem‐A‐QoL PH and TS improved after emicizumab initiation. Mean (standard deviation) –12.0 (21.26)‐ and –8.6 (12.57)‐point improvements were observed in PH and TS from baseline to Week 73; Week 73 scores were 27.9 (24.54) and 22.0 (14.38), respectively. Fifty‐four percent of participants reported a clinically meaningful improvement in PH scores (≥ 10 points) by Week 73. Subgroups with poorer HRQoL prior to starting emicizumab (i.e. receiving episodic treatment, ≥ 9 bleeds, target joints) had the greatest improvements in PH scores, and corresponding reductions in missed workdays; change was not detected among those previously taking prophylaxis. No change over time was detected by the EQ‐5D‐5L questionnaire. Conclusions Emicizumab prophylaxis in PwHA without FVIII inhibitors resulted in persistent and meaningful improvements in Haem‐A‐QoL PH and less work disruption than previous treatment.

Introduction: The phase 2/3 PROTECT VIII main study demonstrated efficacy and safety of BAY 94–9027 (damoctocog alfa pegol; Jivi®), a B-domain-deleted recombinant factor VIII (FVIII), site-specifically PEGylated to extend its half-life. Aim: To report the final efficacy and safety data for BAY 94–9027 from the PROTECT VIII extension. Methods: Previously treated males aged 12–65 years with severe haemophilia A (FVIII

Introduction Central venous access devices (CVAD) are used to facilitate intravenous treatment with coagulation factor concentrates (CFCs) in haemophilia A (HA). Guidelines for perioperative CFC replacement therapy are based on single centre experiences, and the length of replacement therapy varies. Aim The aim of this study was to evaluate whether haemostasis coverage under four days is as effective and safe as a longer period of haemostatic coverage. Methods We identified patients with severe HA without inhibitors or major bleeds within one month of the surgery who received their first CVAD. We compared the CFC consumption and bleeds between children with ≤4 and those who received 5-7 perioperative treatment days including the day of surgery. Bleeds were recorded up to 4 days after the end of perioperative haemostatic coverage. Results In total, 144 children met the eligibility criteria and were included in the study cohort: 34 had received haemostatic coverage for ≤4 days, while 110 had received 5-7 days of haemostatic coverage. One bleed related to the surgery occurred in both groups. Conclusion Overall, the bleeding complications were rare. Haemostatic coverage with CFCs under ≤4 days with elective CVAD insertions was as effective as coverage for ≥5 days.

Introduction BAY 94‐9027 (damoctocog alfa pegol; an extended half‐life PEGylated recombinant factor VIII [FVIII]) demonstrated efficacy and safety in previously treated paediatric patients (PTPs) aged

Prophylaxis treatment is considered as the reference approach for children with severe haemophilia A or B. However, no consensus about the best prophylaxis protocol has yet been identified in term of dosage and timing of infusions. Guidelines were drawn up in France in the early 2000s by an expert group. The objective of this 16-year study (2001 to 2016) was to describe the clotting factor concentrates (CFCs) use in haemophiac outpatients. This is a retrospective monocentric study. Pharmaceutical and clinical data were captured using medical records. Main outcome measures are CFCs use and clinical data in paediatrics. Eighty haemophiliacs A or B under 12 years old with a factor level less than 2% were included (74% of HA), from pharmaceutical outpatient data. Global use of CFCs followed the evolution of the patients' number and regimen type introduced: increase of prophylaxis and decrease of on demand regimen. The average age at the prophylaxis introduction is significantly different according to the birth year. Prophylaxis introduction was made earlier with an increase of prophylactic regimen joined to an increase of CFCs use. The significant reduction of haemarthrosis in our cohort can be linked to a first infusion age and a prophylaxis introduction much earlier.

Haemophilia patients with inhibitors suffer from increased morbidity and mortality due to the ineffectiveness of factor VIII replacement. Pseudotumors are rare but dangerous complications in these patients, and nasal pseudotumors are even rarer. Here, we present the case of a young child with severe haemophilia A with high titre inhibitors who developed a nasal pseudotumor. When immune tolerance therapy was not possible due to financial constraints, he was treated with FEIBA prophylaxis and rituximab. The pseudotumor was managed with surgical excision. We conclude that epistaxis in haemophiliacs can be due to an underlying nasal pseudotumor, and highlight the use of rituximab for the eradication of inhibitors.

Background Previous research has shown that bone mineral density (BMD), a measure of bone strength, may be lower among people with haemophilia. However, the majority of this research has been done in adults and in countries where the treatment for haemophilia differs from the standard of care in Canada, and there is a lack of paediatric data. Aims The primary objective of this study was to determine whether Canadian children and youth with severe haemophilia A and B have BMD similar to healthy controls matched for height, age and weight (HAW-score). Secondary objectives included the exploration of any association between BMD and the following variables: factor replacement regimen, Hemophilia Joint Health Score (HJHS), bleeding history, physical activity level, and dietary intake of calcium, vitamin D, vitamin K and protein. Methods A cross-sectional observational study was designed to determine the BMD of children with severe haemophilia A and B in Canada. Ethical approvals were obtained from participating institutions. Thirty-eight participants aged 3–18 with severe haemophilia A and B were recruited from two treatment centres in Canada. Subjects underwent dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scan, and data was collected from regular clinic visit to identify factor replacement regimen, HJHS, and number of joint bleeds over the lifespan. Physical activity level and dietary intake of calcium, vitamin D, vitamin K and protein were identified using self-report questionnaires. Results Participants showed a mean spine BMD Z-score and HAW-score higher than controls, with no participants showing a spine Z-score or HAW-score of Conclusion Canadian children with severe haemophilia A and B demonstrate differences in spine and total body BMD from height-, age-, and weight-matched controls, where spine BMD is higher than controls and total body BMD is lower than controls. Studies with a larger sample size are needed to clarify the status of BMD in children with haemophilia treated with primary prophylaxis.

Aim The aim of this study was to investigate whether a disease registry could serve as a suitable alternative to clinical studies to investigate safety of orphan drugs in children. Methods We used individual patient data from previously untreated patients (PUPs) with severe haemophilia A from the factor VIII (rAHF‐PFM)‐clinical study and the PedNet registry. The primary outcome was the patient characteristics at entry and the difference in inhibitor development between the clinical study and the registry‐based study at 50 exposure days. Results Clinical study patients more often had a positive family history of inhibitors (31% vs 10%) and a high‐risk F8 genotype (82% vs 63%). In the clinical study 41/55 (75%) and in the registry‐based study 162/168 (96%) patients reached 50 exposure days. Inhibitors developed in 16 of the 41 patients in the clinical study (39%) vs 44 of the 162 patients in the registry‐based study (27%); seven patients (7%) vs 28 patients (17%) had high‐titre inhibitors. The risk of developing an inhibitor during the first 50 exposure days was similar (HR 1.04; 95% CI 0.56‐1.94), when adjusted for family history of inhibitors, F8 gene mutation and intensive treatment at first exposure. Conclusion In the registry‐based study, patient numbers and completeness of follow‐up were higher. The risk of developing an inhibitor to a single product was comparable. Although the sample size of this study was too small to conclude on differences in high‐ or low‐titre inhibitors, this suggests that a registry could serve as a more suitable source for evaluation of high‐titre inhibitors in the setting of factor VIII deficiency.

Background Data on the effect of ABO blood group (ABO), von Willebrand factor (VWF) levels, and age on factor VIII (FVIII) in non-severe haemophilia A (HA) is scarce. Objective To investigate if ABO, VWF levels, and age have an influence on the variability of FVIII levels and consequently on the assessment of severity in non-severe HA. Patients/methods Eighty-nine patients with non-severe HA and 82 healthy controls were included. Data on ABO was collected and FVIII clotting activity (FVIII:C) with one-stage clotting assay (FVIII:C OSA) and chromogenic substrate assay (FVIII:C CSA), FVIII antigen (FVIII:Ag) and VWF antigen (VWF:Ag) and activity (VWF:Act) were determined. Results In HA, FVIII:C OSA and CSA and FVIII:Ag were not different between non-O (n = 42, median 15.5, interquartile range 10.4-24.0; 10.0, 6.8-26.0 and 15.2, 10.7-24.9) and O (n = 47, 14.1, 9.0-23.0; 10.0, 5.0-23.0 and 15.2, 9.3-35.5), whereas in healthy controls, non-O individuals had significantly higher FVIII levels. Fviii C showed no relevant correlation with VWF levels in HA, but we observed strong correlations in healthy controls. Age had only a minor influence in HA, but had a considerable impact on FVIII:C in healthy controls. In multivariable regression analysis ABO, VWF:Ag and age were not associated with FVIII:C in HA, whereas this model explained 61.3% of the FVIII:C variance in healthy controls. Conclusions We conclude that in non-severe HA ABO and VWF levels do not substantially influence the variability of FVIII levels and age has only minor effects on it, which is important information for diagnostic procedures.

Introduction Turoctocog alfa pegol is a glycoPEGylated recombinant factor VIII (FVIII) with an extended half‐life developed for prophylaxis, treatment of bleeds and perioperative management in patients with haemophilia A. Aim Evaluate the efficacy and safety of turoctocog alfa pegol treatment for major and minor surgeries in the pathfinder 3 and 5 phase III trials. Methods Adults/adolescents aged ≥12 years with severe haemophilia A (FVIII 80% during major surgery (pathfinder 3). The primary end point was haemostatic efficacy during surgery; secondary end points were blood loss, haemostatic effect postsurgery, consumption, transfusions, safety and health economics. Children (0‐11 years) undergoing minor surgeries received 20‐75 IU/kg turoctocog alfa pegol at Investigator's discretion (pathfinder 5). Results pathfinder 3 included 35 patients undergoing 49 major surgeries. Haemostasis was successful in 47/49 (95.9%) surgeries; two had moderate haemostatic responses. Median (mean) blood loss during major surgery was 75 (322.6) mL. Four bleeds were reported postsurgery; three were successfully treated with turoctocog alfa pegol (one was not evaluated). On the day of surgery, overall mean (median) dose was 75.5 (74.5) IU/kg and mean (median) number of doses was 1.7 (2.0). Five procedures required 11 transfusions on the day of surgery or days 1‐6. No safety concerns or inhibitors were identified. Forty‐five minor surgeries in 23 children were performed without complications. Conclusion Turoctocog alfa pegol was effective for perioperative haemostatic management of major and minor surgeries in patients across age groups with severe haemophilia A.

Objectives BAY 81‐8973 (Kovaltry®), a full‐length, unmodified, recombinant human factor VIII, provided excellent bleeding control for patients with haemophilia A in the pivotal 1‐year LEOPOLD I trial. The LEOPOLD I extension evaluated long‐term efficacy and safety of BAY 81‐8973 prophylaxis. Methods After completing LEOPOLD I, patients continued receiving 20‒50 IU/kg BAY 81‐8973 two‐ or three‐times weekly in the extension. Outcomes included annualised bleeding rate (ABR) and haemostasis during surgery. Results Fifty‐five patients aged 12‐65 years participated in the extension. Median (range) exposure days during the 2‐year total study period was 309 (115‐355). No patient switched regimens. Median (Q1; Q3) ABR for all bleeds was 2.0 (1.0; 6.1) during the pivotal study, 2.0 (0.0; 5.2) during the extension, and 2.0 (0.5; 5.5) combined. The proportion of joint bleeds affecting target joints decreased (pivotal study: 90.9%, extension: 60.0%). Haemostasis was assessed as excellent/good in all five major surgeries. One serious adverse event (myocardial infarction) occurred in a patient with cardiovascular risk factors. No patients developed inhibitors. Conclusions BAY 81‐8973 prophylaxis efficacy outcomes in the pivotal study were maintained or, in the case of joint protection, improved during the extension, with a safety and tolerability profile consistent with previous experience.

Introduction The efficacy and safety of recombinant factor VIII Fc fusion protein (rFVIIIFc) as an extended half‐life treatment for severe haemophilia A were demonstrated in the Phase 3 A‐LONG and Kids A‐LONG studies. Eligible subjects who completed A‐LONG and Kids A‐LONG could enrol in ASPIRE (NCT01454739), an open‐label extension study. Aim To report the long‐term safety and efficacy of rFVIIIFc in subjects with severe haemophilia A who enrolled in ASPIRE. Methods Previously treated subjects received one or more of the following regimens: individualized prophylaxis (IP), weekly prophylaxis, modified prophylaxis or episodic treatment. Subjects could switch treatment regimen at any time. The primary endpoint was inhibitor development. Results A total of 150 subjects from A‐LONG and 61 subjects from Kids A‐LONG enrolled in ASPIRE. Most subjects received the IP regimen (A‐LONG: n = 110; Kids A‐LONG: n = 59). Median (range) treatment duration in ASPIRE for subjects from A‐LONG and Kids A‐LONG was 3.9 (0.1‐5.3) years and 3.2 (0.3‐3.9) years, respectively. No inhibitors were observed (0 per 1000 subject‐years; 95% confidence interval, 0‐5.2) and the overall rFVIIIFc safety profile was consistent with prior studies. For subjects on the IP regimen, annualized bleed rates (ABR) remained low (median overall ABR for adults and adolescents was

Aim For patients with severe haemophilia A, guidelines recommend prophylactic treatment with FVIII, with dose calculations targeting a predetermined FVIII trough level. However, this pharmacokinetic (PK) approach is suboptimal, with some patients experiencing breakthrough bleeds. We aimed to improve FVIII dosing by incorporating the thrombin generation assay, a global haemostasis assay whose main pharmacodynamic (PD) parameter, endogenous thrombin potential (ETP), predicts spontaneous bleeding risk. Methods We performed post hoc combined PK‐PD modelling using data from 66 adults who received human‐cl rhFVIII (Nuwiq®, Octapharma AG) in a phase IIIb study. Time‐to‐event analyses simulated the probability of spontaneous bleeding for different FVIII exposures and baseline ETPs. Results Ninety‐one spontaneous bleeds occurred in 20/66 patients. The relationship between FVIII:C and ETP was non‐linear, and the sigmoid Emax model adequately described the data. Individual PK‐PD Bayesian estimation significantly improved predictive performance. Simulations showed that the mean spontaneous annual bleeding rate decreased with increasing baseline ETP or dosing: with ETP values of 200, 400 and 600 (nmol/L)·min annual bleeding rates were 2.36, 1.25 and 0.66, respectively, on 40 IU/kg human‐cl rhFVIII every 3 days; and annual bleeding rates were 2.09, 1.10, and 0.60, respectively, on 60 IU/kg every 3 days. Conclusion Prophylactic FVIII dosing is more clinically meaningful when incorporating ETP alongside FVIII level. For the first time, FVIII dosing can be personalized with the aim of eliminating spontaneous breakthrough bleeds.

Aim: to examine healthcare professionals’ (HP) perceptions and experiences in relation to adherence to prophylactic treatment among young people living with haemophilia (YPH). Methods: All HPs in four haemophilia centres across England and Wales were invited to participate, and all HPs who agreed to take part (n = 6) were interviewed. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed and then analysed using Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis (IPA). Results: HPs estimate that generally young people with haemophilia keep to their treatment regimen well, although they also recognise that adherence may fluctuate with many patients going through shorter periods of non-adherence. The increasingly personalised or flexible approach to prophylaxis makes it harder to assess adherence. The main themes identified through IPA included (1) HPs’ suggest that adherence fluctuates (2) Non-adherence is mainly driven by lifestyle and developmental, social and family factors, and (3) Education, HPs’ sensitivity to individual needs, and psychological and peer support are key facilitators of good adherence. Conclusion: The increasingly flexible approach to prophylaxis requires a new way of thinking about, and assessment of, adherence. More personalised treatment regimen can be more complicated and may, therefore, lead to accidental non-adherence. The results of this study with HPs complement those of a previous qualitative study with patients but place greater emphasis on a broader perspective on understanding drivers of non-adherence as well as understanding strategies to improve adherence in the minority of patients who appear to struggle.

Introduction Diagnosis, treatment monitoring and assessment of desmopressin effect in haemophilia A patients are performed by measurement of factor VIII activity (FVIII). The two assays commonly applied are the one‐stage assay and the chromogenic assay. Especially in non‐severe haemophilia A, discrepancies between these assays are common. It is still unestablished which assay corresponds best with bleeding phenotype and desmopressin effect. Aim To correlate FVIII levels measured by the one‐stage assay and by the chromogenic assay with bleeding phenotype and, additionally, to compare FVIII assay discrepancies before and after desmopressin administration. Method Factor VIII was measured in 130 non‐severe haemophilia A patients during routine visits to the outpatient clinic and/or during desmopressin testing. FVIII was measured by both the one‐stage assay and the chromogenic assay. Discrepancies between assays were defined as at least a twofold difference of FVIII or an absolute FVIII difference between measurements of ≥0.10 IU/mL. Bleeding phenotype was defined as annual number of treated bleedings (adjusted ABR). Results Hundred and thirty non‐severe haemophilia A patients were included. In 31/130 patients, assay results were discrepant. However, FVIII measurements with both assays correlated adequately with adjusted ABR. In addition, in 27/130 patients FVIII measurements at baseline and after desmopressin administration were analysed. In 13/27 patients, all measurements were either equivalent or discrepant when results were compared. In 14/27 patients, this was not the case as both equivalent measurements and discrepant measurements at different time points within one patient were observed. Conclusion Neither the one‐stage assay nor the chromogenic assay is superior in predicting bleeding phenotype. In addition, equivalent or discrepant FVIII results measured before desmopressin do not always predict FVIII assay results after desmopressin administration.

INTRODUCTION In many countries, there is a shift from standard half-life (SHL) to extended half-life (EHL) clotting factor concentrates (CFCs). AIM To describe the experience of switching from SHL to an EHL FVIII CFC and the impact of this on frequency of infusions, factor consumption, bleeding rates and HRQoL using the Canadian Hemophilia Kids' Life Assessment Tool (CHO-KLAT). METHODS A retrospective chart review was conducted at a single haemophilia treatment centre in 2018 that included boys (ages: 4-18 years) with moderate/severe haemophilia A, without inhibitors, who switched from a SHL to an EHL FVIII CFC in the previous 2 years and for whom HRQoL data were available. RESULTS The study cohort comprised 38 boys [mean (SD) age: 11.0 (3.4) years] with moderate (n = 5)/severe (n = 33) haemophilia A. The switch was associated with a 33% reduction in the number of weekly infusions from a median of 3.5 to 2.3 (P

Introduction SHP656 is the first factor VIII (FVIII) product developed using polysialylation (PSA) technology, in which full‐length recombinant (r) FVIII (anti‐haemophilic factor [recombinant]) is conjugated with a 20 kDa PSA polymer. Aim To compare the safety, immunogenicity and pharmacokinetics of SHP656 vs the parent rFVIII (octocog alfa) after single infusions of 25‐75 IU/kg in patients with severe haemophilia A (FVIII activity

INTRODUCTION Immune Tolerance Induction (ITI) is the first-choice therapy to eradicate Factor VIII (FVIII) neutralizing antibodies in patients with haemophilia A (HA). There is limited published data on ITI from East Mediterranean countries. AIM To assess the effectiveness of a low-dose ITI regimen to eradicate FVIII neutralizing antibodies in children with severe HA and high-titre inhibitors. METHODS A prospective, single-arm study was conducted in children with HA (FVIII

BACKGROUND Immune tolerance induction (ITI) is the only proven strategy to eradicate factor VIII inhibitors in patients with haemophilia A (HA). AIM To identify patients and treatment options with the highest chance of inhibitor eradication by primary ITI. PATIENTS AND METHODS In the frame of the Italian ITI Registry, carried out from 1995 to 2015 (last follow-up 2018), 137 primary ITI courses in severe HA patients (90/137 with poor prognosis) were analysed for predictors of outcome (complete/partial response or failure). Sixty-six of them (48%) were prospectively evaluated. RESULTS ITI was successful in 91/137 patients (66.4%) and 70 (51.1%) achieved complete response within 11 months (median). Historical peak titres ≤200 BU/ml (P = .033), inhibitor titres ≤5 BU/ml at ITI start (P = .001), peak titres ≤100 BU/ml during ITI (P

Background There is a need to identify patients with haemophilia who have a very low or high risk of developing inhibitors. These patients could be candidates for personalized treatment strategies. Aims The aim of this study was to externally validate a previously published prediction model for inhibitor development and to develop a new prediction model that incorporates novel predictors. Methods The population consisted of 251 previously untreated or minimally treated patients with severe haemophilia A enrolled in the SIPPET study. The outcome was inhibitor formation. Model discrimination was measured using the C-statistic, and model calibration was assessed with a calibration plot. The new model was internally validated using bootstrap resampling. Results Firstly, the previously published prediction model was validated. It consisted of three variables: family history of inhibitor development, F8 gene mutation and intensity of first treatment with factor VIII (FVIII). The C-statistic was 0.53 (95% CI: 0.46-0.60), and calibration was limited. Furthermore, a new prediction model was developed that consisted of four predictors: F8 gene mutation, intensity of first treatment with FVIII, the presence of factor VIII non-neutralizing antibodies before treatment initiation and lastly FVIII product type (recombinant vs. plasma-derived). The C-statistic was 0.66 (95 CI: 0.57-0.75), and calibration was moderate. Using a model cut-off point of 10%, positive- and negative predictive values were 0.22 and 0.95, respectively. Conclusion Performance of all prediction models was limited. However, the new model with all predictors may be useful for identifying a small number of patients with a low risk of inhibitor formation.

Introduction Emicizumab has been shown to be safe and effective for prevention of bleeds in patients with severe haemophilia A (SHA), both with and without inhibitors. The subcutaneous administration and long half-life make emicizumab an attractive option for prophylaxis in infants with SHA, however data to inform treatment decisions in this younger age group are almost absent. Aim The aim of this report is to share real world experience to illustrate how the availability of emicizumab has shifted the prophylaxis paradigm in the management of infants with SHA. Method We selected four cases from our own cohort of infants with SHA to outline the rationale for emicizumab prophylaxis in a range of scenarios familiar to paediatric haemophilia treaters. Results In Case 1 emicizumab was commenced at 7 days following initial treatment of neonatal ICH with a FVIII infusion. In Case 2 emicizumab was commenced at 5 weeks due to parental anxiety regarding the potential for ICH during infancy. Case 3 commenced emicizumab at 15 months in lieu of standard primary prophylaxis. Case 4 switched to emicizumab prophylaxis at 14 months after a period of primary prophylaxis with FVIII concentrates to alleviate parental anxiety regarding future inhibitor development. No patient had any bleeding events after commencement of emicizumab (median follow up 12 months), and no drug-related adverse effects were observed. Conclusion Despite the paucity of data in infants with SHA the potential role of emicizumab prophylaxis should be discussed with families when clinically relevant, with decisions tailored to individual need.