Search

Predicting patient needs for extended care after spinal fusion remains challenging. The Risk Assessment and Prediction Tool (RAPT) was externally developed to predict discharge disposition after nonspine orthopedic surgery but remains scarcely used in neurosurgery. The present study is the first to use coarsened exact matching-which incorporated patient characteristics known to independently affect outcomes-for 1:1 matching across a large population of single-level, posterior lumbar fusions, to isolate the predictive value of preoperative RAPT score on postoperative discharge disposition.Preoperative RAPT scores were prospectively calculated for 1066 patients undergoing consecutive single-level, posterior-only lumbar fusion within a single, university healthcare system. The primary outcome was discharge disposition. Logistic regression was executed across all patients, evaluating the RAPT score as a continuous variable to predict home discharge. Subsequently, patients were retrospectively clustered into predicted risk cohorts-validated within prior orthopedic joint research-based on the RAPT score (Lowest, Intermediate, and Highest Risk). Coarsened exact matching was performed among predicted risk cohorts, and outcomes were compared between exact-matched groups.Among all patients, single-point increases in the RAPT score (i.e., decrease in predicted risk) were associated a 75% increased odds of home discharge (P0.001). Exact-matched analysis demonstrated increased odds of home discharge by 400% when comparing the Lowest versus Highest Risk cohorts (P = 0.004), by 750% when comparing the Intermediate versus Highest Risk cohorts (P0.001), and by 200% when comparing the Lowest versus Intermediate Risk cohorts (P0.001).The RAPT score, captured in preoperative evaluations, can be highly predictive of discharge disposition following single-level, posterior lumbar fusion.

OBJECTIVE Spinal fusion is one of the most common neurosurgical procedures. The LACE (length of stay, acuity of admission, Charlson Comorbidity Index [CCI] score, and emergency department [ED] visits within the previous 6 months) index was developed to predict readmission but has not been tested in a large, homogeneous spinal fusion population. The present study evaluated use of the LACE+ score for outcome prediction after lumbar fusion. METHODS LACE+ scores were calculated for all patients (n = 1598) with complete information who underwent single-level, posterior-only lumbar fusion at a single university medical system. Logistic regression was performed to assess the ability of the LACE+ score as a continuous variable to predict hospital readmissions within 30 days (30D), 30–90 days (30–90D), and 90 days (90D) of the index operation. Secondary outcome measures included ED visits and reoperations. Subsequently, patients with LACE+ scores in the bottom decile were exact matched to the patients with scores in the top 4 deciles to control for sociodemographic and procedural variables. RESULTS Among all patients, increased LACE+ score significantly predicted higher rates of readmissions in the 30D (p < 0.001), 30–90D (p = 0.001), and 90D (p < 0.001) postoperative windows. LACE+ score also predicted risk of ED visits at all 3 time points and reoperations at 30–90D and 90D. When patients with LACE+ scores in the bottom decile were compared with patients with scores in the top 4 deciles, higher LACE+ score predicted higher risk of readmissions at 30D (p = 0.009) and 90D (p = 0.005). No significant difference in hospital readmissions was observed between the exact-matched cohorts. CONCLUSIONS The present results suggest that the LACE+ score demonstrates utility in predicting readmissions within 30 and 90 days after single-level lumbar fusion. Future research is warranted that utilizes the LACE+ index to identify strategies to support high-risk patients in a prospective population.

OBJECTIVE This study assesses how degree of overlap, either before or after the critical operative portion, affects lumbar fusion outcomes. METHODS The authors retrospectively studied 3799 consecutive patients undergoing single-level, posterior-only lumbar fusion over 6 years (2013–2019) at a university health system. Outcomes recorded within 30–90 and 0–90 postoperative days included emergency department (ED) visit, readmission, reoperation, overall morbidity, and mortality. Furthermore, morbidity and mortality were recorded for the duration of follow-up. The amount of overlap that occurred before or after the critical portion of surgery was calculated as a percentage of total beginning or end operative time. Subsequent to initial whole-population analysis, coarsened exact-matched cohorts of patients were created with the least and most amounts of either beginning or end overlap. Univariate analysis was performed on both beginning and end overlap exact-matched cohorts, with significance set at p < 0.05. RESULTS Equivalent outcomes were observed when comparing exact-matched patients. Among the whole population, the degree of beginning overlap was correlated with reduced ED visits within 30–90 and 0–90 days (p = 0.007, p = 0.009; respectively), and less 0–90 day morbidity (p = 0.037). Degree of end overlap was correlated with fewer 30–90 day ED visits (p = 0.015). When comparing only patients with overlap, degree of beginning overlap was correlated with fewer 0–90 day reoperations (p = 0.022), and no outcomes were correlated with degree of end overlap. CONCLUSIONS The degree of overlap before or after the critical step of surgery does not lead to worse outcomes after lumbar fusion.

BACKGROUND: Operative approaches for far lateral disc herniation (FLDH) repair may be classified as open or minimally invasive. The present study aims to compare postoperative outcomes and resource utilization between patients undergoing open and endoscopic (one such minimally invasive approach) FLDH surgeries. METHODS: A total of 144 consecutive adult patients undergoing FLDH repair at a single, university health system over an 8-year period (2013–2020) were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were divided into 2 cohorts: “open” (n = 92) and “endoscopic” (n = 52). Logistic regression was performed to evaluate the impact of procedural type on postoperative outcomes, and resource utilization metrics were compared between cohorts using χ (2) test (for categorical variables) or t test (for continuous variables). Primary postsurgical outcomes included readmissions, reoperations, emergency department visits, and neurosurgery outpatient office visits within 90 days of the index operation. Primary resource utilization outcomes included total direct cost of the procedure and length of stay. Secondary measures included discharge disposition, operative length, and duration of follow-up. RESULTS: No differences were observed in adverse postoperative events. Patients undergoing open FLDH surgery were more likely to attend outpatient visits within 30 days (P = 0.016). Although direct operating room cost was lower (P < 0.001) for open procedures, length of hospital stay was longer (P < 0.001). Patients undergoing open surgery also demonstrated less favorable discharge dispositions, longer operative length, and greater duration of follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: While both procedure types represent viable options for FLDH, endoscopic surgeries appear to achieve comparable clinical outcomes with decreased perioperative resource utilization. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The present study suggests that endoscopic FLDH repairs do not lead to inferior outcomes but may decrease utilization of perioperative resources. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

Background Few studies have assessed the impact of overlapping surgery during different timepoints of neurosurgical procedures. Objective To evaluate the impact of overlap before the critical portion of surgery on short-term patient outcomes following lumbar fusion. Methods In total, 3799 consecutive patients who underwent single-level, posterior-only lumbar fusion over 6 yr (2013-2019) at an academic hospital system were retrospectively studied. Outcomes included 30-d emergency department (ED) visit, readmission, reoperation, mortality, overall morbidity, and overall morbidity/surgical complications. Duration of overlap that occurred before the critical portion of surgery was calculated as a percentage of total beginning operative time. Univariate logistic regression was used to assess the impact of incremental 1% increases in the duration of overlap within the whole population and patients with beginning overlap. Subsequently, univariate analysis was used to compare exact matched patients with the least (bottom 40%) and most amounts of overlap (100% beginning overlap). Coarsened exact matching was used to match patients on key demographic factors, as well as attending surgeon. Significance was set at a P-value Results Increased duration of beginning overlap was associated with a decrease in 30-d ED visit (P = .03) within all patients with beginning overlap, but not within the whole population undergoing lumbar fusion. Duration of beginning overlap was not associated with any other short-term morbidity or mortality outcome in either the whole population or patients with beginning overlap. Conclusion Increased duration of overlap before the critical step of surgery does not predict adverse short-term outcomes after single-level, posterior-only lumbar fusion.

A hallmark of surgical training is resident involvement in operative procedures. While resident-assisted surgeries have been deemed generally safe, few studies have rigorously isolated the impact of resident post-graduate year (PGY) level on post-operative outcomes in a neurosurgical patient population. The objective of this study is to evaluate the relationship between resident training level and outcomes following single-level, posterior-only lumbar fusion, after matching on key patient demographic/clinical characteristics and attending surgeon.This coarsened-exact matching (CEM) study analyzed 2338 consecutive adult patients who underwent single-level lumbar fusion with a resident assistant surgeon at a multi-hospital university health system from 2013 to 2019. Primary outcomes were 30-day and 90-day readmissions, Emergency Department (ED) visits, reoperations, surgical complications, and mortality. First, univariate logistic regression examined the relationship between PGY level and outcomes. Then, CEM was used to control for key patient characteristics - such as race and comorbid status - and supervising attending surgeon, between the most junior (PGY-2)-assisted cases and the most senior (PGY-7)-assisted cases, thereby isolating the relationship between training level and outcomes.Among all patients, resident training level was not associated with risk of adverse post-surgical outcomes. Similarly, between exact-matched cohorts of PGY-2- and PGY-7-assisted cases, no significant differences in adverse events or discharge disposition were observed. Patients with the most senior resident assistant surgeons demonstrated longer length of stay (mean 100.5 vs. 93.8 h, p = 0.022) and longer duration of surgery (mean 173.5 vs. 159.8 min, p = 0.036).Training level of the resident assistant surgeon did not impact adverse outcomes provided to patients in the setting of single-level, posterior-only lumbar fusion. These findings suggest that attending surgeons appropriately manage cases with resident surgeons at different levels of training.

Objectives The objective of this study is to elucidate the impact of income on short-term outcomes in a cerebellopontine angle (CPA) tumor resection population. Design This is a retrospective regression analysis. Setting This study was done at a single, multihospital, urban academic medical center. Participants Over 6 years (from June 7, 2013, to April 24, 2019), 277 consecutive CPA tumor cases were reviewed. Main Outcome Measures Outcomes studied included readmission, emergency department evaluation, unplanned return to surgery, return to surgery after index admission, and mortality. Univariate analysis was conducted among the entire population with significance set at a p-value Results Regression analysis of 273 patients demonstrated decreased rates of unplanned reoperation (p = 0.015) and reoperation after index admission (p = 0.035) at 30 days with higher standardized income. Logistic regression between the lowest (Q1) and highest (Q4) socioeconomic quartiles demonstrated decreased unplanned reoperation (p = 0.045) and decreasing but not significant reoperation after index admission (p = 0.15) for Q4 patients. No significant difference was observed for other metrics of morbidity and mortality. Conclusion Higher socioeconomic status is associated with decreased risk of unplanned reoperation following CPA tumor resection.

Background Gender is a complex social determinant of health affected by both social and biological factors. There is a need to investigate the effect of gender on outcomes, in the absence of confounding characteristics, to mitigate disparities in care. Methods A total of 1970 consecutive patients at a university health system undergoing nonmeningioma supratentorial brain tumor resection over a 6-year period (June 9, 2013–April 26, 2019) were analyzed retrospectively. Coarsened exact matching was used to match patients on demographic factors including history of previous surgery, median household income, and race. Outcomes assessed included readmission, emergency department visit, unplanned reoperation, and mortality within 30 days of surgery. Regression analysis was performed among a prematched population and between the matched cohorts with significance set at a P value Results Within the matched population, no significant difference was observed between male and female patients in any of the recorded outcomes after nonmeningioma supratentorial brain tumor resection, including readmission, emergency department evaluation, unplanned reoperation, and mortality within 30 days of resection (P = 0.28–0.85). Similarly, no significant difference was found in any of the morbidity and mortality outcomes in the prematched regression analysis (P = 0.10–0.70). Conclusions When gender is isolated from race, household economics, and other key factors, it does not seem to independently predict morbidity or mortality in the short-term postoperative window after supratentorial brain tumor resection. Future studies should investigate the impact of gender in longer follow-up and its interrelation with other social determinants of health contributing to outcome disparity.

BACKGROUND: There remains a paucity of literature on the impact of overlap on neurosurgical patient outcomes. The purpose of the present study was to correlate increasing duration of surgical overlap with short-term patient outcomes following lumbar fusion. METHODS: The present study retrospectively analyzed 1302 adult patients undergoing overlapping, single-level, posterior-only lumbar fusion within a single, multicenter, academic health system. Recorded outcomes included 30-day emergency department visits, readmission, reoperation, mortality, overall morbidity, and overall morbidity/surgical complications. The amount of overlap was calculated as a percentage of total overlap time. Comparison was made between patients with the most (top 10%) and least (bottom 40%) amount of overlap. Patients were then exact matched on key demographic factors but not by the attending surgeons. Subsequently, patients were exact matched by both demographic data and the attending surgeons. Univariate analysis was first carried out prior to matching and then on both the demographic-matched and surgeon-matched cohorts. Significance for all analyses was set at a P value of

Introduction By identifying drivers of healthcare disparities, providers can better support high-risk patients and develop risk-mitigation strategies. Household income is a social determinant of health known to contribute to healthcare disparities. The present study evaluates the impact of household income on short-term morbidity and mortality following supratentorial meningioma resection. Methods A total of 349 consecutive patients undergoing supratentorial meningioma resection over a six-year period (2013-2019) were analyzed retrospectively. Primary outcomes were unplanned hospital readmission, reoperations, emergency department (ED) visits, return to the operating room, and all-cause mortality within 30 days of the index operation. Standardized univariate regression was performed across the entire sample to assess the impact of household income on outcomes. Subsequently, outcomes were compared between the lowest (household income ≤ $51,780) and highest (household income ≥ $87,958) income quartiles. Finally, stepwise regression was executed to identify potential confounding variables. Results Across all supratentorial meningioma resection patients, lower household income was correlated with a significantly increased rate of 30-day ED visits (p = 0.002). Comparing the lowest and highest income quartiles, the lowest quartile was similarly observed to have a significantly higher rate of 30-day ED evaluation (p = 0.033). Stepwise regression revealed that the observed association between household income and 30-day ED visits was not affected by confounding variables. Conclusion This study suggests that household income plays a role in short-term ED evaluation following supratentorial meningioma resection.

The American College of Surgeons (ACS) updated its guidelines on overlapping surgery in 2016. The objective was to examine differences in postoperative outcomes after overlapping surgery either pre-ACS guideline revision or post-guideline revision, in a coarsened exact matching sample.A total of 3327 consecutive adult patients undergoing single-level posterior lumbar fusion from 2013 to 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were separated into a pre-ACS guideline revision cohort (surgery before April 2016) or a post-guideline revision cohort (surgery after October 2016) for comparison. The primary outcomes were proportion of cases performed with any degree of overlap, and adverse events including 30-day and 90-day rates of readmission, reoperation, emergency department visit, morbidity, and mortality. Subsequently, coarsened exact matching was used among overlapping surgery patients only to assess the impact of the ACS guideline revision on overlapping outcomes, and controlling for attending surgeon and key patient characteristics known to affect surgical outcomes.After the implementation of the ACS guidelines, fewer cases were performed with overlap (22.0% vs. 53.7%; P0.001). Patients in the post-ACS guideline revision cohort experienced improved rates of readmission and reoperation within 30 and 90 days. However, when limited to overlapping cases only, no differences were observed in overlap outcomes pre-ACS versus post-ACS guideline revision. Similarly, when exact matched on risk-associated patient characteristics and attending surgeon, overlapping surgery patients pre-ACS and post-ACS guideline revision experienced similar rates of 30-day and 90-day outcomes.After the ACS guideline revision, no discernable impact was observed on postoperative outcomes after lumbar fusion performed with overlap.

Gender is a known social determinant of health (SDOH) that has been linked to neurosurgical outcome disparities. To improve quality of care, there exists a need to investigate the impact of gender on procedure-specific outcomes. The objective of this study was to assess the role of gender on short- and long-term outcomes following resection of meningiomas - the most common benign brain neoplasm of adulthood - between exact matched patient cohorts.All consecutive patients undergoing supratentorial meningioma resection (n = 349) at a single, university-wide health system over a 6-year period were analyzed retrospectively. Coarsened exact matching was employed to match patients on numerous key characteristics related to outcomes. Primary outcomes included readmission, ED visit, reoperation, and mortality within 30 and 90 days of surgery. Mortality and reoperation were also assessed during the entire follow-up period. Outcomes were compared between matched female and male cohorts.Between matched cohorts, no significant difference was observed in morbidity or mortality at 30 days (After matching on characteristics known to impact outcomes and when isolated from other SDOHs, gender does not independently affect morbidity and mortality following meningioma resection. Further research on the role of other SDOHs in this population is merited to better understand underlying drivers of disparity.

OBJECTIVE Preoperative prediction of a patient’s postoperative healthcare utilization is challenging, and limited guidance currently exists. The objective of the present study was to assess the capability of individual risk-related patient characteristics, which are available preoperatively, that may predict discharge disposition prior to lumbar fusion. METHODS In total, 1066 consecutive patients who underwent single-level, posterior-only lumbar fusion at a university health system were enrolled. Patients were prospectively asked 4 nondemographic questions from the Risk Assessment and Prediction Tool during preoperative office visits to evaluate key risk-related characteristics: baseline walking ability, use of a gait assistive device, reliance on community supports (e.g., Meals on Wheels), and availability of a postoperative home caretaker. The primary outcome was discharge disposition (home vs skilled nursing facility/acute rehabilitation). Logistic regression was performed to analyze the ability of each risk-related characteristic to predict likelihood of home discharge. RESULTS Regression analysis demonstrated that improved baseline walking ability (OR 3.17), ambulation without a gait assistive device (OR 3.13), and availability of a postoperative home caretaker (OR 1.99) each significantly predicted an increased likelihood of home discharge (all p < 0.0001). However, reliance on community supports did not significantly predict discharge disposition (p = 0.94). CONCLUSIONS Patient mobility and the availability of a postoperative caretaker, when determined preoperatively, strongly predict a patient’s healthcare utilization in the setting of single-level, posterior lumbar fusion. These findings may help surgeons to streamline preoperative clinic workflow and support the patients at highest risk in a targeted fashion.

Background The impact of household economics on outcomes is not well understood. We examined the relationship of income and surgical outcomes, after controlling for numerous patient characteristics. Methods Consecutive adult (≥18) patients (n = 1970, June 2013−April 2019) undergoing supratentorial brain tumor resection, at a single health system, were assessed. Univariate logistic regression was performed to assess the impact of household income on patient survival. The cohort was then separated into income quartiles (range: $18,119−$193,152). The lowest (Q1) and highest (Q4) income quartiles were then compared. Patients (Q1/Q4) subsequently underwent 1:1 coarsened exact matching based on a number of patient characteristics. Outcomes included mortality, emergency evaluations, and readmissions. Results Regression analysis of all 1970 patients demonstrated increasing survival with increasing household income (mortality 30-day P = 0.027, 90-day P = 0.002). Logistic regression of all Q1 versus Q4 patients (n = 970) demonstrated increased survival for the highest income patients (Q4) (mortality 30-day P = 0.220, 90-day P = 0.028, all follow-up P = 0.027). Analysis of exact-matched patients (Q1 vs. Q4; n = 462), demonstrated higher income was associated with escalating, nonsignificant, survival rates at 30 (mortality 3.90% Q1 vs. 2.60% Q4, P = 0.424) and 90 days (mortality 13.42% Q1 vs. 8.66 Q4, P = 0.101) but significantly increased survival during total follow-up (mortality Q1 46.75%, Q4 35.06%, P = 0.010). No significant difference was noted for the remaining studied outcomes. Conclusions Patients matched on a multitude of characteristics, of lesser household income, had higher long-term mortality after brain tumor resection. Further understanding of this disparity should be sought and differences mitigated.

Introduction The LACE+ index has been shown to predict readmissions; however, LACE+ has not been validated for extended postoperative outcomes in an orthopedic surgery population. The purpose of this study is to examine whether LACE+ scores predict unplanned readmissions and adverse outcomes following orthopedic surgery. Use of the LACE1 index to proactively identify at-risk patients may enable actions to reduce preventable readmissions. Methods LACE+ scores were retrospectively calculated at the time of discharge for all consecutive orthopedic surgery patients (n = 18,893) at a multicenter health system over 3 years (2016-2018). Coarsened exact matching was used to match patients based on characteristics not assessed in the LACE+ index. Outcome differences between matched patients in different LACE quartiles (i.e. Q4 vs. Q3, Q2, and Q1) were analyzed. Results Higher LACE+ scores significantly predicted readmission and emergency department visits within 90 days of discharge and for 30-90 days after discharge for all studied quartiles. Higher LACE+ scores also significantly predicted reoperations, but only between Q4 and Q3 quartiles. Conclusions The results suggest that the LACE+ risk-prediction tool may accurately predict patients with a high likelihood of adverse outcomes after a broad array of orthopedic procedures.

Background: Clinical practice in postoperative bracing after posterior single-level lumbar spine fusion (PLF) is inconsistent between providers. This study seeks to assess the effect of bracing on short-term outcomes related to safety, quality of care, and direct costs. Methods: Retrospective cohort analyses of consecutive patients undergoing single-level PLF with or without bracing at a three-hospital urban academic medical center (2013–2017) were undertaken (n = 906). Patient demographics and comorbidities were analyzed. Test of independence, Mann–Whitney–Wilcoxon test, and logistic regression were used to assess differences in length of stay (LOS), discharge disposition/need for postacute care, quality-adjusted life year (QALY), surgical site infection (SSI), hospital cost, total cost, readmission within 30 days, and emergency room (ER) visits within 30 days. Results: Among the study population, 863 patients were braced and 43 were not braced. No difference was seen between the two groups in short-term outcomes from surgery including LOS (P = 0.836), discharge disposition (P = 0.226), readmission (P = 1.000), ER visits (P = 0.281), SSI (P = 1.000), and QALY gain (P = 0.319). However, the braced group incurred a significantly higher direct hospital cost (median increase of 41.43%, P < 0.001) compared to the unbraced cohort (bracing cost excluded). There was no difference in graft type (P = 0.145) or comorbidities (P = 0.20–1.00) such as obesity (P = 1.000), smoking (P = 1.000), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (P = 1.000), hypertension (P = 0.805), coronary artery disease (P = 1.000), congestive heart failure (P = 1.000), and total number of comorbidities (P = 0.228). Conclusion: Short-term data suggest that removal of bracing from the postoperative regimen for PLF will not result in increased adverse outcomes but will reduce cost.

OBJECTIVEAlthough it is known that intersurgeon variability in offering elective surgery can have major consequences for patient morbidity and healthcare spending, data addressing variability within neurosurgery are scarce. The authors performed a prospective peer review study of randomly selected neurosurgery cases in order to assess the extent of consensus regarding the decision to offer elective surgery among attending neurosurgeons across one large academic institution.METHODSAll consecutive patients who had undergone standard inpatient surgical interventions of 1 of 4 types (craniotomy for tumor [CFT], nonacute redo CFT, first-time spine surgery with/without instrumentation, and nonacute redo spine surgery with/without instrumentation) during the period 2015–2017 were retrospectively enrolled (n = 9156 patient surgeries, n = 80 randomly selected individual cases, n = 20 index cases of each type randomly selected for review). The selected cases were scored by attending neurosurgeons using a need for surgery (NFS) score based on clinical data (patient demographics, preoperative notes, radiology reports, and operative notes; n = 616 independent case reviews). Attending neurosurgeon reviewers were blinded as to performing provider and surgical outcome. Aggregate NFS scores across various categories were measured. The authors employed a repeated-measures mixed ANOVA model with autoregressive variance structure to compute omnibus statistical tests across the various surgery types. Interrater reliability (IRR) was measured using Cohen’s kappa based on binary NFS scores.RESULTSOverall, the authors found that most of the neurosurgical procedures studied were rated as “indicated” by blinded attending neurosurgeons (mean NFS = 88.3, all p values < 0.001) with greater agreement among neurosurgeon raters than expected by chance (IRR = 81.78%, p = 0.016). Redo surgery had lower NFS scores and IRR scores than first-time surgery, both for craniotomy and spine surgery (ANOVA, all p values < 0.01). Spine surgeries with fusion had lower NFS scores than spine surgeries without fusion procedures (p < 0.01).CONCLUSIONSThere was general agreement among neurosurgeons in terms of indication for surgery; however, revision surgery of all types and spine surgery with fusion procedures had the lowest amount of decision consensus. These results should guide efforts aimed at reducing unnecessary variability in surgical practice with the goal of effective allocation of healthcare resources to advance the value paradigm in neurosurgery.

BACKGROUND This study used coarsened exact matching to investigate the effectiveness of the LACE+ index (i.e., length of stay, acuity of admission, Charlson Comorbidity Index, and emergency department visits in the past 6 months) predictive tool in patients undergoing plastic surgery. METHODS Coarsened exact matching was used to assess the predictive ability of the LACE+ index among plastic surgery patients over a 2-year period (2016 to 2018) at one health system (n = 5744). Subjects were matched on factors not included in the LACE+ index such as duration of surgery, body mass index, and race, among others. Outcomes studied included emergency room visits, hospital readmission, and unplanned return to the operating room. RESULTS Three hundred sixty-six patients were matched and compared for quarter 1 to quarter 4 (n = 732, a 28.2 percent match rate); 504 patients were matched for quarter 2 to quarter 4 (n = 1008, a 36.7 percent match rate); 615 patients were matched for quarter 3 to quarter 4 (n = 1230, a 44.8 percent match rate). Increased LACE+ score significantly predicted readmission within 30 days for quarter 1 versus quarter 4 (1.09 percent versus 4.37 percent; p = 0.019), quarter 2 versus quarter 4 (3.57 percent versus 7.34 percent; p = 0.008), and quarter 3 versus quarter 4 (5.04 percent versus 8.13 percent; p = 0.028). Higher LACE+ score also significantly predicted 30-day reoperation for quarter 3 versus quarter 4 (1.30 percent versus 3.90 percent; p = 0.003) and emergency room visits within 30 days for quarter 2 versus quarter 4 (3.17 percent versus 6.75 percent; p = 0.008). CONCLUSION The results of this study demonstrate that the LACE+ index may be suitable as a prediction model for patient outcomes in a plastic surgery population. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Risk, II.

Background The relationship between race and neurosurgical outcomes is poorly characterized despite its importance. The influence of race on short-term patient outcomes in a pituitary tumor surgery population was assessed. Methods Coarsened exact matching was used to retrospectively analyze 567 consecutive pituitary tumor cases from a 6-year period (June 7, 2013, to April 29, 2019) at a single, multihospital academic medical center. Outcomes studied included 30-day readmission, mortality, and reoperation. Results There were 92 exact-matched cases suitable for analysis. There was a significant difference in 30-day emergency department visits between the 2 races (black/African American vs. white odds ratio = 4.5, 95% confidence interval = 1.072–30.559, P = 0.0386). There was no observed mortality over the 30-day postoperative period. There was no significant difference in 30-day readmission between the 2 race cohorts (P = 0.3877), in return to surgery after index admission within 30 days (P = 1.000), or in return to surgery within 30 days (P = 0.3750). Conclusions This study suggests that the effect of race on outcomes is partly mitigated for individuals who can attain access, and when socioeconomic factors and comorbidities are controlled for. The noted significant difference in emergency department visits could be indicative of confounding variables that were not well controlled for and requires further exploration.

The LACE+ (Length of stay, Acuity of admission, Charlson Comorbidity Index score, and Emergency department visits in the past 6 months) risk-prediction tool has never been tested in an orthopedic surgery population. LACE+ may help physicians more effectively identify and support high-risk orthopedics patients after hospital discharge. LACE+ scores were retrospectively calculated for all consecutive orthopedic surgery patients (n = 18 893) at a multi-center health system over 3 years (2016-2018). Coarsened exact matching was employed to create "matched" study groups with different LACE+ score quartiles (Q1, Q2, Q3, Q4). Outcomes were compared between quartiles. In all, 1444 patients were matched between Q1 and Q4 (n = 2888); 2079 patients between Q2 and Q4 (n = 4158); 3032 patients between Q3 and Q4 (n = 6064). Higher LACE+ scores significantly predicted 30D readmission risk for Q4 vs Q1 and Q4 vs Q3 (P < .001). Larger LACE+ scores also significantly predicted 30D risk of ED visits for Q4 vs Q1, Q4 vs Q2, and Q4 vs Q3 (P < .001). Increased LACE+ score also significantly predicted 30D risk of reoperation for Q4 vs Q1 (P = .018), Q4 vs Q2 (P < .001), and Q4 vs Q3 (P < .001).

Background: Use of cervical bracing/collar subsequent to anterior cervical spine discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is variable. Outcomes data regarding bracing after ACDF are limited. Here, we study the impact of bracing on short-term outcomes related to safety, quality of care, and direct costs in multilevel ACDF. Methods: Retrospective cohort analyses of all consecutive patients undergoing multilevel ACDF with or without bracing from 2013 to 2017 was undertaken (n = 616). Patient demographics and comorbidities were analyzed. Tests of independence and logistic regressions were used to assess differences in length of stay (LOS), discharge disposition (home, assisted rehabilitation facility [ARF], or skilled nursing facility [SNF]), quality-adjusted life year (QALY), direct cost, readmission within 30 days, and emergency room (ER) visits within 30 days. Results: Amongst the study population, 553 were braced and 63 were not braced. There was no difference in comorbidities (P > .05) such as obesity, smoking, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, hypertension, coronary artery disease, congestive heart failure, and problem list number. A significant difference in American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score was found, with more ASA 2 patients in the braced cohort and more ASA 3 patients in the unbraced cohort (P = .007). LOS was extended for the unbraced group (median 156.9 ± 211.4 versus 86.67 ± 130.6 h, P = .003), and ER visits within 30 days were 0.21 times less likely in the braced group (P = .006). There was no difference in readmission (P = .181), QALY gain (P = .968), and direct costs (P = .689). Conclusion: Bracing following multilevel cervical fixation does not alter short-term postoperative course or reduce the risk for early adverse outcomes in a significant manner.

BACKGROUND Overlapping surgery is a long-standing practice that has not been well studied. The aim of this study was to assess whether overlapping surgery is associated with untoward outcomes for orthopaedic patients. METHODS Coarsened exact matching was used to assess the impact of overlap on outcomes among elective orthopaedic surgical interventions (n = 18,316) over 2 years (2014 and 2015) at 1 health-care system. Overlap was categorized as any overlap, and subcategories of exclusively beginning overlap and exclusively end overlap. Study subjects were matched on the Charlson comorbidity index score, duration of surgery, surgical costs, body mass index, length of stay, payer, and race, among others. Serious unanticipated events were studied. RESULTS A total of 3,395 patients had any overlap and were matched (a match rate of 90.8% of 3,738). For beginning and end overlap, matched groups were created, with a match rate of 95.2% of 1043 and 94.7% of 863, respectively. Among matched patients, any overlap did not predict an unanticipated return to surgery at 30 days (8.2% for any overlap and 8.3% for no overlap; p = 0.922) or 90 days (14.1% and 14.1%, respectively; p = 1.000). Patients who had surgery with any overlap demonstrated no difference compared with controls with respect to reoperation, readmission, or emergency room (ER) visits at 30 or 90 days (a reoperation rate of 3.1% and 3.2%, respectively [p = 0.884] at 30 days and 4.2% and 3.5% [p = 0.173] at 90 days; a readmission rate of 10.3% and 11.0% [p = 0.352] at 30 days and 5.5% and 5.2% [p = 0.570] at 90 days; and an ER visit rate of 5.2% and 4.6% [p = 0.276] at 30 days and 4.8% and 4.3% [p = 0.304] at 90 days). Patients with surgical overlap showed reduced mortality compared with controls during follow-up (1.8% and 2.6%, respectively; p = 0.029). Patients with beginning and/or end overlap had a similar lack of association with serious unanticipated events; however, patients with end overlap showed an increased unexpected rate of return to the operating room after reoperation at 90 days (13.3% versus 9.7%; p = 0.015). CONCLUSIONS Nonconcurrent overlapping surgery was not associated with adverse outcomes in a large, matched orthopaedic surgery population across 1 academic health system. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Previously undiagnosed obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a known contributor to negative postoperative outcomes. The STOP-Bang questionnaire is a screening tool for OSA that has been validated in both medical and surgical populations. The authors have previously studied this screening tool in a brain tumor population at 30 days. The present study seeks to investigate the effectiveness of this questionnaire, for predicting 90-day readmissions in a population of brain tumor patients with previously undiagnosed OSA.Included for analysis were all patients undergoing craniotomy for supratentorial neoplasm at a multihospital, single academic medical center. Data were collected from supratentorial craniotomy cases for which the patient was alive at 90 days after surgery (n = 238). Simple logistic regression analyses were used to assess the ability of the STOP-Bang questionnaire and subsequent single variables to accurately predict patient outcomes at 90 days.The sample included 238 brain tumor admissions, of which 50% were female (n = 119). The average STOP-Bang score was 1.95 ± 1.24 (range 0-7). A 1-unit higher increase in STOP-Bang score accurately predicted 90-day readmissions (odds ratio [OR] = 1.65, P = 0.001), 30- to 90-day emergency department visits (OR = 1.85, P 0.001), and 30- to 90-day reoperation (OR = 2.32, P 0.001) with fair accuracy as confirmed by the receiver operating characteristic (C-statistic = 0.65-0.76). However, the STOP-Bang questionnaire did not correlate with home discharge (P = 0.315).The results of this study suggest that undiagnosed OSA, as evaluated by the STOP-Bang questionnaire, is an effective predictor of readmission risk and health system utilization in a brain tumor craniotomy population with previously undiagnosed OSA.

This study assessed the ability of the LACE + [Length of stay, Acuity of admission, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) score, and Emergency department visits in the past 6 months] index to predict adverse outcomes after urologic surgery. LACE + scores were retrospectively calculated for all consecutive patients (n = 9824) who received urologic surgery at one multi-center health system over 2 years (2016–2018). Coarsened exact matching was employed to sort patient data before analysis; matching criteria included duration of surgery, BMI, and race among others. Outcomes including unplanned hospital readmission, emergency room visits, and reoperation were compared for patients with different LACE + quartiles. 722 patients were matched between Q1 and Q4; 1120 patients were matched between Q2 and Q4; 2550 patients were matched between Q3 and Q4. Higher LACE + score significantly predicted readmission within 90 days (90D) of discharge for Q1 vs Q4 and Q2 vs Q4. Increased LACE + score also significantly predicted 90D emergency room visits for Q1 vs Q4, Q2 vs Q4, and Q3 vs Q4. LACE + score was also significantly predictive of 90D reoperation for Q1 vs Q4. LACE + score did not predict 90D reoperation for Q2 vs Q4 or Q3 vs Q4 or 90D readmission for Q3 vs. Q4. These results suggest that LACE + may be a suitable prediction model for important patient outcomes after urologic surgery.

To examine the potential of LACE+ scores, in patients undergoing urologic surgery, to predict short-term undesirable outcomes.Coarsened exact matching was used to assess the predictive value of the LACE+ index among all urologic surgery cases over a 2-year period (2016-2018) at 1 health system (n = 9824). Study subjects were matched on characteristics not assessed by LACE+, including duration of surgery and race, among others. For comparison of outcomes, matched populations were compared by LACE+ quartile with Q4 as the referent group: Q4 vs Q1, Q4 vs Q2, Q4 vs Q3.Seven hundred and twenty-two patients were matched for Q1-Q4; 1120 patients were matched for Q2-Q4; 2550 patients were matched for Q3-Q4. Escalating LACE+ score significantly predicted increased readmission (2.86% vs 4.91% for Q2 vs Q4; P = .012) and Emergency Room (ER) visits at 30 days postop (5.69% vs 11.37% for Q1 vs Q4, 4.11% vs 11.45% for Q2 vs Q4, 8.29% vs 13.32% for Q3 vs Q4; P.001 for all). Increasing LACE score did not predict reoperation within 30 days or rate of death over follow-up within 30 postoperative days.The results of this study suggest that the LACE+ index is suitable as a prediction model for important patient outcomes in a urologic surgery population including unanticipated readmission and ER evaluation.

Introduction The analysis of social determinants of health (SDOH) across different surgical populations is critical for the identification of health disparities and the development risk mitigation strategies among vulnerable patients. Research into the impact of gender on neurosurgical outcomes remains limited. The aim of the present study was to assess the effect of gender on outcomes, in a matched sample, following posterior fossa tumor resection, a high-risk neurosurgical procedure. Methods Two hundred seventy-eight consecutive patients undergoing posterior fossa tumor resection over a six-year period (June 07, 2013, to April 29, 2019) at a single academic medical system were retrospectively evaluated. Short-term outcomes included 30- and 90-day rates of emergency department (ED) visit, readmission, reoperation, and mortality. Long-term outcomes included mortality and reoperation for the duration of follow-up. Firstly, male and female patients in the entire pre-match sample were compared. Thereafter, coarsened exact matching was employed to control for confounding variables, matching male and female patients on key demographic factors - including history of prior surgery, median household income, and race, amongst others - and outcome comparison was repeated. Results In both the entire pre-match sample and matched cohort analyses, no significant differences in adverse postsurgical events were discerned between the female and male patients when evaluating 30-day or 90-day rates of ED visit, readmission, reoperation, and mortality. There were also no differences in reoperation or mortality for the duration of follow-up. Conclusion Gender does not appear to impact short- or long-term outcomes following posterior fossa tumor resection. As such, risk assessment and mitigation strategies in this population should focus on other SDOH. Further studies should assess the role of other SDOH within this population.

Background Clinical practice in postoperative bracing after posterior lumbar spine fusion (PLF) is inconsistent between providers. This paper attempts to assess the effect of bracing on short-term outcomes related to safety, quality of care, and direct costs. Methods Retrospective cohort analysis of consecutive patients undergoing multilevel PLF with or without bracing (2013–2017) was undertaken (n = 980). Patient demographics and comorbidities were analyzed. Outcomes assessed included length of stay (LOS), discharge disposition, quality-adjusted life years (QALY), surgical-site infection (SSI), total cost, readmission within 30 days, and emergency department (ED) evaluation within 30 days. Results Amongst the study population, 936 were braced and 44 were not braced. There was no difference between the braced and unbraced cohorts regarding LOS (P = .106), discharge disposition (P = .898), 30-day readmission (P = .434), and 30-day ED evaluation (P = 1.000). There was also no difference in total cost (P = .230) or QALY gain (P = .740). The results indicate a significantly lower likelihood of SSI in the braced population (1.50% versus 6.82%, odds ratio = 0.208, 95% confidence interval = 0.057–0.751, P = .037). There was no difference in relevant comorbidities (P = .259–1.000), although the braced cohort was older than the unbraced cohort (63 versus 56 y, P = .003). Conclusion Bracing following multilevel posterior lumbar fixation does not alter short-term postoperative course or reduce the risk for early adverse events. Cost analysis show no difference in direct costs between the 2 treatment approaches. Short-term data suggest that removal of bracing from the postoperative regimen for PLF will not result in increased adverse outcomes.

BACKGROUND Numerous studies have demonstrated that household income is independently predictive of postsurgical morbidity and mortality, but few studies have elucidated this relationship in a purely spine surgery population. This study aims to correlate household income with adverse events after discectomy for far lateral disc herniation (FLDH). METHODS All adult patients (n = 144) who underwent FLDH surgery at a single, multihospital, 1659-bed university health system (2013-2020) were retrospectively analyzed. Univariate logistic regression was used to evaluate the relationship between household income and adverse postsurgical events, including unplanned hospital readmissions, ED visits, and reoperations. RESULTS Mean age of the population was 61.72 ± 11.55 years. Mean household income was $78,283 ± 26,996; 69 (47.9%) were female; and 126 (87.5%) were non-Hispanic white. Ninety-two patients underwent open and fifty-two underwent endoscopic FLDH surgery. Each additional dollar decrease in household income was significantly associated with increased risk of reoperation of any kind within 90-days, but not 30-days, after the index admission. However, household income did not predict risk of readmission or ED visit within either 30-days or 30-90-days post-surgery. CONCLUSIONS These findings suggest that household income may predict reoperation following FLDH surgery. Additional research is warranted into the relationship between household income and adverse neurosurgical outcomes.

Introduction Previous studies have demonstrated that obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is associated with adverse postoperative outcomes, but few studies have examined OSA in a purely spine surgery population. This study investigates the association of the STOP-Bang questionnaire, a screening tool for undiagnosed OSA, with adverse events following discectomy for far lateral disc herniation (FLDH). Methods All adult patients (n = 144) who underwent FLDH surgery at a single, multihospital, academic medical center (2013-2020) were retrospectively enrolled. Univariate logistic regression was performed to evaluate the relationship between risk of OSA (low- or high-risk) according to STOP-Bang score and postsurgical outcomes, including unplanned hospital readmissions, ED visits, and reoperations. Results Ninety-two patients underwent open FLDH surgery, while 52 underwent endoscopic procedures. High risk of OSA according to STOP-Bang score did not predict risk of readmission, ED visit, outpatient office visit, or reoperation of any kind within either 30 days or 30-90 days of surgery. High risk of OSA also did not predict risk of reoperation of any kind or repeat neurosurgical intervention within 30 days or 90 days of the index admission (either during the same admission or after discharge). Conclusion The STOP-Bang questionnaire is not a reliable tool for predicting post-operative morbidity and mortality for FLDH patients undergoing discectomy. Additional studies are needed to assess the impact of OSA on morbidity and mortality in other spine surgery populations.

BACKGROUND As the use of bundled care payment models has become widespread in neurosurgery, there is a distinct need for improved preoperative predictive tools to identify patients who will not benefit from prolonged hospitalization, thus facilitating earlier discharge to rehabilitation or nursing facilities. OBJECTIVE To validate the use of Risk Assessment and Prediction Tool (RAPT) in patients undergoing posterior lumbar fusion for predicting discharge disposition. METHODS Patients undergoing elective posterior lumbar fusion from June 2016 to February 2017 were prospectively enrolled. RAPT scores and discharge outcomes were recorded for patients aged 50 yr or more (n = 432). Logistic regression analysis was used to assess the ability of RAPT score to predict discharge disposition. Multivariate regression was performed in a backwards stepwise logistic fashion to create a binomial model. RESULTS Escalating RAPT score predicts disposition to home (P

Objective Assess the safety of overlapping surgery before implementation of new recommendations and regulations. Background Overlapping surgery is a longstanding practice that has not been well studied. There remains a need to analyze data across institutions and specialties to draw well-informed conclusions regarding appropriate application of this practice. Methods Coarsened exact matching was used to assess the impact of overlap on outcomes amongst all surgical interventions (n = 61,524) over 1 year (2014) at 1 health system. Overlap was categorized as: any, beginning, or end overlap. Study subjects were matched 1:1 on 11 variables. Serious unanticipated events were studied including unplanned return to operating room, readmission, and mortality. Results In all, 8391 patients (13.6%) had any overlap and underwent coarsened exact matching. For beginning/end overlap, matched groups were created (total matched population N = 4534/3616 patients, respectively). Any overlap did not predict unanticipated return to surgery (9.8% any overlap vs 10.1% no overlap; P = 0.45). Further, any overlap did not predict an increase in reoperation, readmission, or emergency room (ER) visits at 30 or 90 days (30D reoperation 3.6% vs 3.7%; P = 0.83, 90D reoperation 3.8% vs 3.9%; P = 0.84) (30D readmission 9.9% vs 10.2%; P = 0.45, 90D readmissions 6.9% vs 7.0%; P = 0.90) (30D ER 5.4% vs 5.6%; P = 0.60, 90D ER 4.8% vs 4.7%; P = 0.71). In addition, any overlap was not associated with mortality over the surgical follow-up period (90D mortality 1.7% vs 2.1%; P = 0.06). Beginning/end overlap had results similar to any overlap. Conclusion Overlapping, nonconcurrent surgery is not associated with an increase in reoperation, readmission, ER visits, or unanticipated return to surgery.

Objective: The LACE + index (Length of stay, Acuity of admission, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) score, and Emergency department visits in the past 6 months) is a tool utilized to predict 30–90 day readmission and other secondary outcomes. We sought to examine the effectiveness of this predictive tool in patients undergoing brain tumor surgery. Patients and methods: Admissions and readmissions for patients undergoing craniotomy for supratentorial neoplasm at a single, multi-hospital, academic medical center, were analyzed. Key data was prospectively collected with the Neurosurgery Quality Improvement Initiative (NQII)-EpiLog tool. This included all supratentorial craniotomy cases for which the patient was alive at 90 days after surgery (n = 238). Simple logistic regression analyses were used to assess the ability of the LACE + index and subsequent single variables to accurately predict the outcome measures of 30–90 day readmission, 30–90 day emergency department (ED) visit, and 30–90 day reoperation. Analysis of the model’s or variable’s discrimination was determined by the receiver operating characteristic curve as represented by the C-statistic. Results: The sample included admissions for craniotomy for supratentorial neoplasm (n = 238) from 227 patients, of which 50.00% were female (n = 119). The average LACE + index score was 53.48 ± 16.69 (Range 9–83). The LACE + index did not accurately predict 30–90 day readmissions (P = 0.127), 30–90 day ED visits (P = 0.308), nor reoperations (P = 0.644). ROC confirmed that the LACE + index was little better than random chance at predicting these events in this population (C-statistic = 0.51−0.58). However, a single unit increase in LACE + leads to a 0.97 times reduction in the odds of being discharged home with fair predictive accuracy (P Conclusion: The results of this study show that the LACE + index is ill-equipped to predict 30–90 day readmissions in the brain tumor population and further analysis of significant covariates or other prediction tools should be undertaken.

Background Context: Use of cervical bracing/collar subsequent to anterior cervical spine discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is variable. Outcomes data regarding bracing after ACDF are limited. Purpose: The purpose of the study is to study the impact of bracing on short-term outcomes related to safety, quality of care, and direct costs in single-level ACDF. Study Design/Setting: This retrospective cohort analysis of all consecutive patients (n = 578) undergoing single-level ACDF with or without bracing from 2013 to 2017 was undertaken. Methods: Patient demographics and comorbidities were analyzed. Tests of independence (Chi-square, Fisher's exact, and Cochran–Mantel–Haenszel test), Mann–Whitney–Wilcoxon tests, and logistic regressions were used to assess differences in length of stay (LOS), discharge disposition (home, assisted rehabilitation facility-assisted rehabilitation facility, or skilled nursing facility), quality-adjusted life year (QALY), surgical site infection (SSI), direct cost, readmission within 30 days, and emergency room (ER) visits within 30 days. Results: Among the study population, 511 were braced and 67 were not braced. There was no difference in graft type (P = 1.00) or comorbidities (P = 0.06–0.73) such as obesity (P = 0.504), smoking (0.103), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease hypertension (P = 0.543), coronary artery disease (P = 0.442), congestive heart failure (P = 0.207), and problem list number (P = 0.661). LOS was extended for the unbraced group (median 34.00 + 112.15 vs. 77.00 + 209.31 h, P < 0.001). There was no difference in readmission (P = 1.000), ER visits (P = 1.000), SSI (P = 1.000), QALY gain (P = 0.437), and direct costs (P = 0.732). Conclusions: Bracing following single-level cervical fixation does not alter short-term postoperative course or reduce the risk for early adverse outcomes in a significant manner. The absence of bracing is associated with increased LOS, but cost analyses show no difference in direct costs between the two treatment approaches. Further evaluation of long-term outcomes and fusion rates will be necessary before definitive recommendations regarding bracing utility following single-level ACDF.

BACKGROUND Several studies have explored the effect of overlapping surgery on patient outcomes, but impact of surgical overlap during wound closure has not been studied. OBJECTIVE To examine the association of overlap during wound closure and suture time overlap (STO) with patient outcomes in a heterogeneous neurosurgical population. METHODS Over 4 yr (7/2013-7/2017), 1 7689 neurosurgical procedures were retrospectively reviewed at a single, multihospital academic medical center. STO was defined as all surgeries for which an overlapping surgery occurred, exclusively, during wound closure of the index case being studied. We excluded nonelective cases and overlapping surgeries that involved overlap during surgical portions of the case other than wound closure. Tests of independence and Wilcoxon tests were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS Patients with STO had a shortened length of hospital stay (100.6 vs 135.1 h; P

Purpose Gender is a known social determinant of health which has been linked disparities in medical care. This study intends to assess the impact of gender on 90-day and long-term morbidity and mortality outcomes following supratentorial brain tumor resection in a coarsened-exact matched population. Materials and methods A total of 1970 consecutive patients at a single, university-wide health system undergoing supratentorial brain tumor resection over a six-year period (09 June 2013 to 26 April 2019) were analyzed retrospectively. Coarsened Exact Matching was employed to match patients on key demographic factors including history of prior surgery, smoking status, median household income, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade, and Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), amongst others. Primary outcomes assessed included readmission, ED visit, unplanned reoperation, and mortality within 90 days of surgery. Long-term outcomes such as mortality and unplanned return to surgery during the entire follow-up period were also recorded. Results Whole-population regression demonstrated significantly increased mortality throughout the entire follow-up period for the male cohort (p = 0.004, OR = 1.32, 95% CI = 1.09 - 1.59); however, no significant difference was found after coarsened exact matching was performed (p = 0.08). In both the whole-population regression and matched-cohort analysis, no significant difference was observed between gender and readmission, ED visit, unplanned reoperation, or mortality in the 90-day post-operative window, in addition to return to surgery after throughout the entire follow-up period. Conclusion After controlling for confounding variables, female birth gender did not significantly predict any difference in morbidity and mortality outcomes following supratentorial brain tumor resection. Difference between mortality outcomes in the pre-matched population versus the matched cohort suggests the need to better manage the underlying health conditions of male patients in order to prevent future disparities.

It is well documented that the interaction between many social factors can affect clinical outcomes. However, the independent effects of economics on outcomes following surgery are not well understood. The goal of this study is to investigate the role socioeconomic status has on postoperative outcomes in a cerebellopontine angle (CPA) tumor resection population.Over 6 years (07 June 2013 to 24 April 2019), 277 consecutive CPA tumor cases were reviewed at a single, multihospital academic medical center. Patient characteristics obtained included median household income, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), race, BMI, tobacco use, amongst 23 others. Outcomes studied included readmission, ED evaluation, unplanned return to surgery (during and after index admission), return to surgery after index admission, and mortality within 90 days, in addition to reoperation and mortality throughout the entire follow-up period. Univariate analysis was conducted amongst the entire population with significance set at aRegression analysis of 273 patients did not find household income to be associated with any of the long-term outcomes assessed. Similarly, a Q1 vs Q4 comparison did not yield significantly different odds of outcomes assessed.Although not statistically significant, the odds ratios suggest socioeconomic status may have a clinically significant effect on postsurgical outcomes. Further studies in larger, matched populations are necessary to validate these findings.

Introduction The LACE+ (Length of Stay, Acuity of Admission, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) Score, Emergency Department (ED) visits within the previous 6 months) index has never been tested in a purely spine surgery population. This study assesses the ability of LACE + to predict adverse patient outcomes following discectomy for far lateral disc herniation (FLDH). Patients and Methods Data were obtained for patients (n = 144) who underwent far lateral lumbar discectomy at a single, multi-hospital academic medical center (2013–2020). LACE + scores were calculated for all patients with complete information (n = 100). The influence of confounding variables was assessed and controlled with stepwise regression. Logistic regression was used to test the ability of LACE + to predict risk of unplanned hospital readmission, ED visits, outpatient office visits, and reoperation after surgery. Results Mean age of the population was 61.72 ± 11.55 years, 69 (47.9 %) were female, and 126 (87.5 %) were non-Hispanic white. Patients underwent either open (n = 92) or endoscopic (n = 52) surgery. Each point increase in LACE + score significantly predicted, in the 30-day (30D) and 30−90-day (30−90D) post-discharge window, higher risk of readmission (p = 0.005, p = 0.009; respectively) and ED visits (p = 0.045). Increasing LACE + also predicted, in the 30D and 90-day (90D) post-discharge window, risk of reoperation (p = 0.022, p = 0.016; respectively), and repeat neurosurgical intervention (p = 0.026, p = 0.026; respectively). Increasing LACE + score also predicted risk of reoperation (p = 0.011) within 30 days of initial surgery. Conclusions LACE + may be suitable for characterizing risk of adverse perioperative events for patients undergoing far lateral discectomy.

Objective Gender can contribute to adverse patient outcomes through social and biological factors. It is important to assess the effects of gender on long-term patient outcomes after care has already been accessed, in order to improve quality of care and mitigate healthcare disparities. Patients and Methods 277 consecutive patients undergoing cerebellopontine angle tumor resection over a six-year period (June 09, 2013 – April 29, 2019) at a university health system were retrospectively evaluated. Outcomes included 90-day emergency department (ED) visit, readmission, reoperation and mortality following resection. Male and female patients in the whole population were analyzed by logistic regression. Thereafter, Coarsened Exact Matching was used to match female and male on important demographic factors, including history of prior surgery, median household income, and Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) score, among others. Regression was carried out in the matched population, with significance set at a p-value Results In the matched population analysis, males were significantly more likely to experience mortality during the length of follow-up (p = 0.03) but not within 90-days of resection. There were no significant differences in 90-day mortality or reoperation during the length of follow-up in either the matched or pre-matched populations. No significant differences were found in any of the 90-day morbidity outcomes in either the matched or pre-matched populations. Conclusion Gender may predict long-term outcomes in patients following CPA tumor resection. It is possible that gender also contributes to outcome disparities in other neurosurgical procedures, which future studies should evaluate.

OBJECTIVE There is a paucity of research on the safety of overlapping surgery. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of overlapping surgery on a homogenous population of exactly matched patients undergoing single-level, posterior-only lumbar fusion. METHODS The authors retrospectively analyzed case data of 3799 consecutive adult patients who underwent single-level, posterior-only lumbar fusion during a 6-year period (June 7, 2013, to April 29, 2019) at a multihospital university health system. Outcomes included 30-day emergency department (ED) visit, readmission, reoperation, and morbidity and mortality following surgery. Thereafter, coarsened exact matching was used to match patients with and without overlap on key demographic factors, including American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) score, sex, and body mass index (BMI), among others. Patients were subsequently matched by both demographic data and by the specific surgeon performing the operation. Univariate analysis was carried out on the whole population, the demographically matched cohort, and the surgeon-matched cohort, with significance set at a p value < 0.05. RESULTS There was no significant difference in morbidity or any short-term outcome, including readmission, reoperation, ED evaluation, and mortality. Among the demographically matched cohort and surgeon-matched cohort, there was no significant difference in age, sex, history of prior surgery, ASA class, or CCI score. Overlapping surgery patients in both the demographically matched cohort and the matched cohort limited by surgeon had longer durations of surgery (p < 0.01), but no increased morbidity or mortality was noted. Patients selected for overlap had fewer prior surgeries and lower ASA class and CCI score (p < 0.01). Patients with overlap also had a longer duration of surgery (p < 0.01) but not duration of closure. CONCLUSIONS Exactly matched patients undergoing overlapping single-level lumbar fusion procedures had no increased short-term morbidity or mortality; however, duration of surgery was 20 minutes longer on average for overlapping operations. Further studies should assess long-term patient outcomes and the impact of overlap in this and other surgical procedures.

Background Disparities exist in medical care and may result in avoidable negative clinical care outcomes for those affected. There remains a paucity in the literature regarding the impact of economic disparities on neurosurgical outcomes. Methods A total of 283 consecutive posterior fossa brain tumor resections, excluding cerebellopontine angle tumors, over a six-year period (June 07, 2013, to April 29, 2019) at a single, multihospital academic medical center were analyzed retrospectively. Outcomes evaluated included 30-day readmission and mortality, emergency department (ED) evaluation, unplanned return to surgery within 30 days, and return to surgery after index admission within 30 days. The population was divided into quartiles based on median household income, and univariate analysis was conducted between the lowest (Q1) and highest (Q4) socioeconomic quartiles, with significance set at a p < 0.05. Stepwise regression was conducted to determine the correlations among study variables and identify confounding factors. Results Whole population univariate analysis demonstrated lower socioeconomic status (SES) to be correlated with increased mortality within 30 post-operative days and increased return to surgery after index admission. No significant difference was found with regard to 30-day readmission, ED evaluation, unplanned reoperation, or return to surgery after index admission. Decreasing, but not significant, mortality was demonstrated between Q1 and Q4 socioeconomic quartiles. Conclusions This study suggests that low SES, when defined by household income, correlates with increased mortality within 30 days and an increased need for return to surgery within 30 days. There may be an opportunity for hospitals and care providers to use SES to proactively identify high-risk patients and test the impact of supports in the post-operative setting.

Background Access to medical care seems to be impacted by race. However, the effect of race on outcomes, once care has been established, is poorly understood. Purpose This study seeks to assess the influence of race on patient outcomes in a brain tumor surgery population. Importance and relevance to healthcare quality This study offers insights to if or how quality is impacted based on patient race, after care has been established. Knowledge of disparities may serve as a valuable first step toward risk factor mitigation. Methods Patients differing in race, but matched on other outcomes affecting characteristics, were assessed for differences in outcomes subsequent to brain tumor resection. Coarsened exact matching was used to match 1700 supratentorial brain tumor procedures performed over a 6-year period at a single, multihospital academic medical center. Patient outcomes assessed included unplanned readmission, mortality, emergency department (ED) visits, and unanticipated return to surgery. Results There was no significant difference in readmissions, mortality, ED visits, return to surgery after index admission, or return to surgery within 30 days between the two races. Conclusion This study suggests that race does not independently influence postsurgical outcomes but may instead serve as a proxy for other closely related demographics.

This study assesses the impact of Median Household Income (MHI) on short- and long-term morbidity and mortality following supratentorial meningioma resection.351 consecutive patients undergoing supratentorial meningioma tumor resection, at a single health system over a six-year period (June 09, 2013 to April 26, 2019) were analyzed retrospectively. Outcomes assessed included readmission, emergency department (ED) evaluation, and mortality within 90 days of surgery. Univariate regression analysis was conducted amongst the entire population. The population was then divided into quartiles based on median household income and univariate analysis was conducted between the lowest (Q1) and highest (Q4) quartiles. Significance was set at a P-value0.05. Stepwise regression was performed to identify confounding variables in the logistic model.In the whole population, lower Median Household Income correlated to a significant increase in ED evaluation within 90-days of supratentorial meningioma resection. No significant difference was noted between median household income and 90-day readmission, 90-day unplanned re-operation, return to surgery after index admission within 90-days, return to surgery during the duration of the follow-up period, mortality within 90-days, and mortality during the duration of the follow-up period. In addition, when comparing Q1 (MHI ≤ $51,780) and Q4 (MHI ≥ $87,958), similar results were noted with increased ED evaluation for patients with lower MHI, but no significant difference in other factors of morbidity or mortality.Following supratentorial meningioma resection, a lower median household income was significantly associated with increased emergency department visits within 90 post-operative days.

OBJECTIVES This study used coarsened exact matching to assess the ability of the LACE+ index to predict adverse outcomes after plastic surgery. STUDY DESIGN Two-year retrospective study (2016-2018). METHODS LACE+ scores were retrospectively calculated for all patients undergoing plastic surgery at a multicenter health system (N = 5744). Coarsened exact matching was performed to sort patient data before analysis. Outcomes including unplanned hospital readmission, emergency department visits, and reoperation were compared for patients in different LACE+ score quartiles (Q1, Q2, Q3, Q4). RESULTS A total of 2970 patient procedures were matched during coarsened exact matching. Increased LACE+ score significantly predicted readmission within 90 days of discharge for Q4 versus Q1 (6.28% vs 1.91%; P = .003), Q4 versus Q2 (12.30% vs 5.56%; P

Objectives The LACE+ index risk prediction tool has not been successfully used to predict short-term outcomes after neurosurgery. This study assessed the ability of LACE+ to predict 30-day (30D) adverse outcomes after supratentorial brain tumor surgery. Patients and methods LACE+ scores were retrospectively calculated for consecutive patients (n = 624) who received surgery for supratentorial tumors at one multi-center health system (2017–2019). Coarsened exact matching was employed to control for confounding variables. Outcomes including unplanned hospital readmission, emergency department visits, and death were compared for patients with different LACE+ score quartiles (Q1, Q2, Q3, Q4). Results 134 patients were matched between Q1 and Q4; 152 patients between Q2 and Q4; 192 patients between Q3 and Q4. LACE+ score was not found to predict readmission within 30D of discharge for Q1 vs Q4 (p = 0.239), Q2 vs Q4 (p = 0.336), or Q3 vs Q4 (p = 0.739). LACE + score also did not predict 30D risk of emergency department visits for Q1 vs Q4 (p = 0.210), Q2 vs Q4 (p = 0.839), or Q3 vs Q4 (p = 0.167). LACE + did predict death within 30D of surgery for Q3 vs Q4 (1.04 % vs 7.29 %, p = 0.039), but not for Q1 vs Q4 (p = 0.625) or Q2 vs Q4 (p = 0.125). Conclusion LACE + may not be suitable for characterizing short-term risk of certain perioperative events in a patient population undergoing supratentorial brain tumor surgery.