Search

In the last decade, there has been a growing interest in applying AI technologies to implement complex data analytics over data streams. To this end, researchers in various fields have been organising a yearly event called the "Stream Reasoning Workshop" to share perspectives, challenges, and experiences around this topic. In this paper, the previous organisers of the workshops and other community members provide a summary of the main research results that have been discussed during the first six editions of the event. These results can be categorised into four main research areas: The first is concerned with the technological challenges related to handling large data streams. The second area aims at adapting and extending existing semantic technologies to data streams. The third and fourth areas focus on how to implement reasoning techniques, either considering deductive or inductive techniques, to extract new and valuable knowledge from the data in the stream. This summary is written not only to provide a crystallisation of the field, but also to point out distinctive traits of the stream reasoning community. Moreover, it also provides a foundation for future research by enumerating a list of use cases and open challenges, to stimulate others to join this exciting research area.

Aim: Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) for peripheral artery disease (PAD) commonly leads to dissections which are associated with higher target lesion revascularization (TLR) rates. Clinical and economic consequences of dissection management in the femoropopliteal artery following PTA, and specifically the potential economic benefit of focal dissection repair using the novel Tack Endovascular System, remain unknown. Methods: A decision-analytic model was used to estimate 24-month clinical events, costs and quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gain for a Tack-supported versus status-quo PTA strategy. Patient and lesion characteristics and TLR rates were derived from the PTA cohort of the TOBA II clinical trial, an observational cohort, and literature. Cost-effectiveness was determined from a US payer and provider perspective separately for the non-severe (grade A or B), severe (grade C and higher) and the entire dissection cohort. Results: TLR rates were lower for the Tack-supported strategy compared with PTA (7.7 vs 27.4% in the non-severe, 13.9 vs 25.8% in the severe and 12.0 vs 26.3% in the entire dissection cohort). Cost and QALY differences were +$297/ + 0.0110 in the non-severe dissection cohort and -$1602/ + 0.0067 in the severe dissection cohort, resulting in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of $25,622 in the non-severe cohort and dominance in the severe cohort and the entire cohort. Conclusion: Compared with a 'status-quo' approach, proactive focal stenting may lead to fewer reinterventions and improved quality of life. There appears to be a graded economic benefit of focal dissection treatment, being cost-effective in non-severe dissections and even cost saving in severe dissections.

Background: Transcarotid artery revascularization (TCAR) has emerged as an alternative therapeutic modality to carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and transfemoral carotid artery stenting (TFCAS) for the management of patients with carotid artery stenosis. However, certain issues regarding the indications and contraindications of TCAR remain unanswered or unresolved. The aim of this international, expert-based Delphi consensus document was to attempt to provide some guidance on these topics., Methods: A 3-round Delphi consensus process was performed, including 29 experts. The aim of round 1 was to investigate the differing views and opinions of the participants. Round 2 was carried out after the results from the literature on each topic were provided to the participants. During round 3, the participants had the opportunity to finalize their vote., Results: Most participants agreed that TCAR can or can probably or possibly be performed within 14 days of a cerebrovascular event, but it is best to avoid it in the first 48 hr. It was felt that TCAR cannot or should not replace TFCAS or CEA, as each procedure has specific indications and contraindications. Symptomatic patients >80 years should probably be treated with TCAR rather than with TFCAS. TCAR can or can probably be used for the treatment of restenosis following CEA or TFCAS. Finally, there is a need for a randomized controlled trial (RCT) to provide better evidence for the unresolved issues., Conclusions: This Delphi consensus document attempted to assist the decision-making of physicians or interventionalists or vascular surgeons involved in the management of carotid stenosis patients. Furthermore, areas requiring additional research were identified. Future studies and RCTs should provide more evidence to address the unanswered questions regarding TCAR., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: Participation in the Vascular Quality Initiative (VQI) provides important resources to surgeons, but the ability to do so is often limited by time and data entry personnel. Large language models (LLMs) such as ChatGPT (OpenAI) are examples of generative artificial intelligence (AI) products that may help bridge this gap. Trained on large volumes of data, the models are used for natural language processing (NLP) and text generation. We evaluated the ability of LLMs to accurately populate VQI procedural databases using operative reports., Methods: A single-center retrospective study was performed using institutional VQI data from 2021-2023. The most recent procedures for carotid endarterectomy (CEA), endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) and infrainguinal lower extremity bypass (LEB) were analyzed using Versa, a HIPAA-compliant institutional version of ChatGPT. We created an automated function to analyze operative reports and generate a shareable VQI file using two models: gpt-35-turbo and gpt-4. Application of the LLMs was accomplished with a cloud-based programming interface. The outputs of this model were compared to VQI data for accuracy. We defined a metric as "unavailable" to the LLM if it was discussed by surgeons in <20% of operative reports. unavailable., Results: 150 operative notes were analyzed, including 50 CEA, 50 EVAR, and 50 LEB. These procedural VQI databases included 25, 179, and 51 metrics, respectively. For all fields, gpt-35-turbo had a median accuracy of 84.0% for CEA (IQR 80.0-88.0%), 92.2% for EVAR (IQR 87.2-94.0%), and 84.3% for LEB (IQR 80.2-88.1%). There were 3 of 25, 6 of 179, and 7 of 51 VQI variables were unavailable in the operative reports, respectively. Excluding metric information routinely unavailable in operative reports, the median accuracy rate was 95.5% for each CEA procedure (IQR 90.9-100.0%), 94.8% (IQR 92.2-98.5) for EVAR, and 93.2% for LEB (IQR 90.2-96.4%). Across procedures, gpt-4 did not meaningfully improve performance compared to gpt-35 (p=0.97, 0.85, 0.95 for CEA, EVAR, LEB overall performance). The cost for 150 operative reports analyzed with gpt-35-turbo and gpt-4 were $0.12 and $3.39, respectively., Conclusion: LLMs can accurately populate VQI procedural databases with both structured and unstructured data, while incurring only minor processing costs. Increased workflow efficiency may improve center ability to successfully participate in the VQI. Further work examining other VQI databases and methods to increase accuracy are needed., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Objective: Sustained clinical and hemodynamic benefit after revascularization for chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) is needed to resolve symptoms and prevent limb loss. We sought to compare rates of clinical and hemodynamic failure as well as resolution of initial and prevention of recurrent CLTI after endovascular (ENDO) vs bypass (OPEN) revascularization in the Best-Endovascular-versus-best-Surgical-Therapy-in-patients-with-CLTI (BEST-CLI) trial., Methods: As planned secondary analyses of the BEST-CLI trial, we examined the rates of (1) clinical failure (a composite of all-cause death, above-ankle amputation, major reintervention, and degradation of WIfI stage); (2) hemodynamic failure (a composite of above-ankle amputation, major and minor reintervention to maintain index limb patency, failure to an initial increase or a subsequent decrease in ankle brachial index of 0.15 or toe brachial index of 0.10, and radiographic evidence of treatment stenosis or occlusion); (3) time to resolution of presenting CLTI symptoms; and (4) incidence of recurrent CLTI. Time-to-event analyses were performed by intention-to-treat assignment in both trial cohorts (cohort 1: suitable single segment great saphenous vein [SSGSV], N = 1434; cohort 2: lacking suitable SSGSV, N = 396), and multivariate stratified Cox regression models were created., Results: In cohort 1, there was a significant difference in time to clinical failure (log-rank P < .001), hemodynamic failure (log-rank P < .001), and resolution of presenting symptoms (log-rank P = .009) in favor of OPEN. In cohort 2, there was a significantly lower rate of hemodynamic failure (log-rank P = .006) favoring OPEN, and no significant difference in time to clinical failure or resolution of presenting symptoms. Multivariate analysis revealed that assignment to OPEN was associated with a significantly lower risk of clinical and hemodynamic failure in both cohorts and a significantly higher likelihood of resolving initial and preventing recurrent CLTI symptoms in cohort 1, including after adjustment for key baseline patient covariates (end-stage renal disease [ESRD], prior revascularization, smoking, diabetes, age >80 years, WIfI stage, tissue loss, and infrapopliteal disease). Factors independently associated with clinical failure included age >80 years in cohort 1 and ESRD across both cohorts. ESRD was associated with hemodynamic failure in cohort 1. Factors associated with slower resolution of presenting symptoms included diabetes in cohort 1 and WIfI stage in cohort 2., Conclusions: Durable clinical and hemodynamic benefit after revascularization for CLTI is important to avoid persistent and recurrent CLTI, reinterventions, and limb loss. When compared with ENDO, initial treatment with OPEN surgical bypass, particularly with available saphenous vein, is associated with improved clinical and hemodynamic outcomes and enhanced resolution of CLTI symptoms., Competing Interests: Disclosures M.T.M. is the advisor for Janssen. A.F. grants from Novo Nordisk Foundation; is a consultant for Sanifit, LeMaitre, and BioGenCell; and is on the advisor board of Dialysis-X and iThera Medical. L.C.C. is a consulting speaker for Cook Medical. P.A.S. is a consultant for Medtronic, Boston Scientific, Philips, Silk Road, Surmodics, Cagent, and Limflow. B.M.H. reports research grants (site PI for clinical trials, no compensation) from Boston Scientific and NIH/NHLBI. M.D.D. is a consultant for Cook Medical, W.L. Gore, and Boston Scientific. K.R. receives income as a consultant or member of a scientific advisory board for the following entities: Abbott Vascular, Althea Medical, Angiodynamics, Auxetics, Becton-Dickinson, Boston Scientific, Contego, Crossliner, Innova Vascular, Inspire MD, Janssen/Johnson and Johnson, Magneto, Mayo Clinic, MedAlliance, Medtronic, Neptune Medical, Penumbra, Philips, Surmodics, Terumo, Thrombolex, Truvic, Vasorum, and Vumedi; and owns equity or stock options in the following entities: Access Vascular, Aerami, Althea Medical, Auxetics, Contego, Crossliner, Cruzar Systems, Endospan, Imperative Care/Truvic, Innova Vascular, InspireMD, JanaCare, Magneto, MedAlliance, Neptune Medical, Orchestra, Prosomnus, Shockwave, Skydance, Summa Therapeutics, Thrombolex, Vasorum, and Vumedi. K.R. or his institution (on his behalf) receives research grants from the following entities: NIH, Abiomed, Boston Scientific, Novo Nordisk Foundation, Penumbra, and Gettinge-Atrium. He serves as a member of the Board of Directors of the following organization: The National PERT Consortium. M.S.C. has a relationship with Abbott Vascular DSMB. The remaining authors report no conflicts., (Copyright © 2024 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: The aim of the TRANSCEND study was to compare the safety and efficacy of the next generation SurVeil PCB with the IN.PACT Admiral PCB in patients with femoropopliteal arterial disease. SurVeil is a lower dose PCB (2.0 μg/mm 2 vs. 3.5 μg/mm 2 for IN.PACT Admiral) with a uniform microcrystalline coating intending to enhance durability and maximise drug delivery., Methods: TRANSCEND is a prospective, single blind, randomised controlled, multicentre, non-inferiority clinical study. Patients with femoropopliteal artery disease in Rutherford stages 2 - 4 were randomised 1:1 to the SurVeil or the IN.PACT Admiral PCB. A sample size of 446 patients was calculated to prove non-inferiority of the SurVeil compared to the IN.PACT Admiral PCB for primary safety and efficacy endpoints at twelve months. Primary safety was defined as a composite of freedom from device and procedure related death through 30 days, and freedom from major target limb amputation and clinically driven (CD) target vessel revascularisation at twelve months. Primary efficacy was defined primary patency at twelve months as a composite of freedom from binary restenosis and freedom from CD target lesion revascularisation. Secondary outcomes were reported up to twenty four months., Results: A total of 446 subjects were randomised, 222 to treatment with the SurVeil and 224 to the IN.PACT Admiral PCB. Primary safety was 91.8% for the SurVeil vs. 89.8% for the IN.PACT Admiral group (p non-inferiority < .001), and primary efficacy was 82.2% vs. 85.9% (p non-inferiority = .003). Primary patency through 24 months was 65.4% with the SurVeil and 66.9% with the IN.PACT Admiral PCB (p non-inferiority = .005)., Conclusion: The next generation low dose SurVeil PCB demonstrated excellent safety and efficacy up to twenty four months and was non-inferior to the IN.PACT Admiral PCB. (ClinicalTrials registration ID: NCT03241459)., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Recent studies indicate that replication checkpoint modulators (RCMs) such as inhibitors of CHK1, ATR, and WEE1 have promising monotherapy activity in solid tumors, including platinum-resistant high grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC). However, clinical response rates are generally below 30%. While RCM-induced DNA damage has been extensively examined in preclinical and clinical studies, the link between replication checkpoint interruption and tumor shrinkage remains incompletely understood. Here we utilized HGSOC cell lines and patient-derived xenografts (PDXs) to study events leading from RCM treatment to ovarian cancer cell death. These studies show that RCMs increase CDC25A levels and CDK2 signaling in vitro, leading to dysregulated cell cycle progression and increased replication stress in HGSOC cell lines independent of homologous recombination status. These events lead to sequential activation of JNK and multiple BH3-only proteins, including BCL2L11/BIM, BBC3/PUMA and the BMF, all of which are required to fully initiate RCM-induced apoptosis. Activation of the same signaling pathway occurs in HGSOC PDXs that are resistant to poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors but respond to RCMs ex vivo with a decrease in cell number in 3-dimensional culture and in vivo with xenograft shrinkage or a significantly diminished growth rate. These findings identify key cell death-initiating events that link replication checkpoint inhibition to antitumor response in ovarian cancer., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Azacitidine/venetoclax is an active regimen in patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML). However, primary or secondary resistance to azacitidine/venetoclax is an area of unmet need and overexpression of MCL1 is suggested to be a potential resistance mechanism. Pevonedistat inhibits MCL1 through activation of NOXA, and pevonedistat/azacitidine has previously shown activity in AML. To assess the tolerability and efficacy of adding pevonedistat to azacitidine/ venetoclax in relapsed/refractory AML, we conducted a phase I, multicenter, open-label study in 16 adults with relapsed/ refractory AML. Patients were treated with azacitidine, venetoclax along with pevonedistat intravenously on days 1, 3 and 5 of each 28-day cycle at doses of 10, 15 or 20 mg/m2 in successive cohorts in the dose escalation phase. The impact of treatment on protein neddylation as well as expression of pro-apoptotic BCL2 family members was assessed. The recommended phase II dose of pevonedistat was 20 mg/m2. Grade 3 or higher adverse events included neutropenia (31%), thrombocytopenia (13%), febrile neutropenia (19%), anemia (19%), hypertension (19%) and sepsis (19%). The overall response rate was 46.7% for the whole cohort including complete remission in five of seven (71.4%) patients who had not previously been treated with the hypomethylating agent/venetoclax. No measurable residual disease was detected in 80.0% of the patients who achieved complete remission. The median time to best response was 50 (range, 23-77) days. Four patients were bridged to allogeneic stem cell transplantation. The combination of azacitidine, venetoclax and pevonedistat is safe and shows encouraging preliminary activity in patients with relapsed/refractory AML. (NCT04172844).

Objective: Major adverse limb event-free survival (MALE-FS) differed significantly by initial revascularization approach in the BEST-CLI randomized trial. The BEST-CLI trial represented a highly selected subgroup of patients seen in clinical practice; thus, we examined the endpoint of MALE-FS in an all-comers tertiary care practice setting., Methods: This is a single-center retrospective study of consecutive, unique patients who underwent technically successful infrainguinal revascularization for chronic limb-threatening ischemia (2011-2021). MALE was major amputation (transtibial or above) or major reintervention (new bypass, open bypass revision, thrombectomy, or thrombolysis)., Results: Among 469 subjects, the mean age was 70 years, and 34% were female. Characteristics included diabetes (68%), end-stage renal disease (ESRD) (16%), Wound, Ischemia, and foot Infection (WIfI) stage 4 (44%), Global Limb Anatomic Staging System (GLASS) stage 3 (62%), and high pedal artery calcium score (pMAC) (22%). Index revascularization was autogenous vein bypass (AVB) (30%), non-autogenous bypass (NAB) (13%), or endovascular (ENDO) (57%). The composite endpoint of MALE or death occurred in 237 patients (51%) at a median time of 189 days from index revascularization. In an adjusted Cox model, factors independently associated with MALE or death included younger age, ESRD, WIfI stage 4, higher GLASS stage, and moderate-severe pMAC, whereas AVB was associated with improved MALE-FS. Freedom from MALE-FS, MALE, and major amputation at 30 days were 90%, 92%, and 95%; and at 1 year were 63%, 70%, and 83%, respectively. MALE occurred in 144 patients (31%) and was associated with ESRD, WIfI stage, GLASS stage, pMAC score, and index revascularization approach. AVB had superior durability, with adjusted 2-year freedom from MALE of 72%, compared with 66% for ENDO and 51% for NAB. Within the AVB group, spliced vein conduit had higher MALE compared with single-segment vein (hazard ratio, 1.8; 95% confidence interval, 0.9-3.7; P = .008 after inverse propensity weighting), but there was no statistically significant difference in major amputation. Of the 144 patients with any MALE, the first MALE was major reintervention in 47% and major amputation in 53%. Major amputation as first MALE was associated with non-AVB index approach. Indications for major reintervention were symptomatic stenosis/occlusion (54%), lack of clinical improvement (28%), asymptomatic graft stenosis (16%), and iatrogenic events (3%). Conversion to bypass occurred after 6% of ENDO cases, two-thirds of which involved distal bypass targets at the ankle or foot., Conclusions: In this consecutive, all-comers cohort, disease complexity was associated with procedural selection and MALE-FS. AVB independently provided the greatest MALE-FS and freedom from MALE and major amputation. Compared with the BEST-CLI randomized trial, MALE after ENDO in this series was more frequently major amputation, with relatively few conversions to open bypass., Competing Interests: Disclosures M.S.C. reports co-chair, BEST-CLI Executive Committee. J.S.H., W.G.J., P.A.S., and S.M.V. report BEST-CLI investigators., (Copyright © 2024 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

BH3 mimetics, including the BCL2/BCLX L /BCLw inhibitor navitoclax and MCL1 inhibitors S64315 and tapotoclax, have undergone clinical testing for a variety of neoplasms. Because of toxicities, including thrombocytopenia after BCLX L inhibition as well as hematopoietic, hepatic and possible cardiac toxicities after MCL1 inhibition, there is substantial interest in finding agents that can safely sensitize neoplastic cells to these BH3 mimetics. Building on the observation that BH3 mimetic monotherapy induces AMP kinase (AMPK) activation in multiple acute leukemia cell lines, we report that the AMPK inhibitors (AMPKis) dorsomorphin and BAY-3827 sensitize these cells to navitoclax or MCL1 inhibitors. Cell fractionation and phosphoproteomic analyses suggest that sensitization by dorsomorphin involves dephosphorylation of the proapoptotic BCL2 family member BAD at Ser75 and Ser99, leading BAD to translocate to mitochondria and inhibit BCLX L . Consistent with these results, BAD knockout or mutation to BAD S75E/S99E abolishes the sensitizing effects of dorsomorphin. Conversely, dorsomorphin synergizes with navitoclax or the MCL1 inhibitor S63845 to induce cell death in primary acute leukemia samples ex vivo and increases the antitumor effects of navitoclax or S63845 in several xenograft models in vivo with little or no increase in toxicity in normal tissues. These results suggest that AMPK inhibition can sensitize acute leukemia to multiple BH3 mimetics, potentially allowing administration of lower doses while inducing similar antineoplastic effects., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to ADMC Associazione Differenziamento e Morte Cellulare.)

Introduction: Two of the main reasons recent guidelines do not recommend routine population-wide screening programs for asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis (AsxCS) is that screening could lead to an increase of carotid revascularization procedures and that such mass screening programs may not be cost-effective. Nevertheless, selective screening for AsxCS could have several benefits. This article presents the rationale for such a program., Areas Covered: The benefits of selective screening for AsxCS include early recognition of AsxCS allowing timely initiation of preventive measures to reduce future myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, cardiac death and cardiovascular (CV) event rates., Expert Opinion: Mass screening programs for AsxCS are neither clinically effective nor cost-effective. Nevertheless, targeted screening of populations at high risk for AsxCS provides an opportunity to identify these individuals earlier rather than later and to initiate a number of lifestyle measures, risk factor modifications, and intensive medical therapy in order to prevent future strokes and CV events. For patients at 'higher risk of stroke' on best medical treatment, a prophylactic carotid intervention may be considered.

Objective: The optimal management of patients with asymptomatic carotid stenosis (AsxCS) is enduringly controversial. We updated our 2021 Expert Review and Position Statement, focusing on recent advances in the diagnosis and management of patients with AsxCS., Methods: A systematic review of the literature was performed up to August 1, 2023, using PubMed/PubMed Central, EMBASE and Scopus. The following keywords were used in various combinations: "asymptomatic carotid stenosis," "carotid endarterectomy" (CEA), "carotid artery stenting" (CAS), and "transcarotid artery revascularization" (TCAR). Areas covered included (i) improvements in best medical treatment (BMT) for patients with AsxCS and declining stroke risk, (ii) technological advances in surgical/endovascular skills/techniques and outcomes, (iii) risk factors, clinical/imaging characteristics and risk prediction models for the identification of high-risk AsxCS patient subgroups, and (iv) the association between cognitive dysfunction and AsxCS., Results: BMT is essential for all patients with AsxCS, regardless of whether they will eventually be offered CEA, CAS, or TCAR. Specific patient subgroups at high risk for stroke despite BMT should be considered for a carotid revascularization procedure. These patients include those with severe (≥80%) AsxCS, transcranial Doppler-detected microemboli, plaque echolucency on Duplex ultrasound examination, silent infarcts on brain computed tomography or magnetic resonance angiography scans, decreased cerebrovascular reserve, increased size of juxtaluminal hypoechoic area, AsxCS progression, carotid plaque ulceration, and intraplaque hemorrhage. Treatment of patients with AsxCS should be individualized, taking into consideration individual patient preferences and needs, clinical and imaging characteristics, and cultural, ethnic, and social factors. Solid evidence supporting or refuting an association between AsxCS and cognitive dysfunction is lacking., Conclusions: The optimal management of patients with AsxCS should include BMT for all individuals and a prophylactic carotid revascularization procedure (CEA, CAS, or TCAR) for some asymptomatic patient subgroups, additionally taking into consideration individual patient needs and preference, clinical and imaging characteristics, social and cultural factors, and the available stroke risk prediction models. Future studies should investigate the association between AsxCS with cognitive function and the role of carotid revascularization procedures in the progression or reversal of cognitive dysfunction., Competing Interests: Disclosures J.F.M. is co-Principal Investigator for the Clinical Coordinating Center of the CREST-2 multicenter randomized clinical trial (U01NS080168) and Principal Investigator of the Long-term Observational Extension of participants in the CREST-2 randomized clinical trial (C2LOE; U01NS119169). M.L.S. is the Principal Investigator of the ROADSTER-3 trial and is the Chair of the TCAR Surveillance Program in the Vascular Quality Initiative. L.H.B., P.J.N., and M.M.B. are co-Principal Investigators for the 2nd European Carotid Surgery Trial (ECST-2). P.S. is a consultant for Silk Road, Philips, Surmodics, Medtronic, Boston Scientific, Cagent, and LimFlow. E.A.S. has received research grants from the Food & Drug Administration (FDA), SCAI, BD, Boston Scientific, Cook, Laminate Medical, Medtronic, Philips, and NIH/NHLBIK23HL150290. He has received Consulting/Speaker fees from Abbott, Bayer, BD, Boston Scientific, Cook, Cordis, Heartflow, Inari, InfraRedx, Medtronic, Philips, RapidAI, Shockwave, and VentureMed. D.P.M. has given talks, acted as a consultant or attended conferences sponsored by Amgen and Novo Nordisk. B.K.L. is co-Principal Investigator of the CREST-2 multicenter randomized clinical trial (U01NS080168), Principal Investigator of the CREST-2 Registry (C2R; NCT02240862) and Principal Investigator for the Asymptomatic Carotid Stenosis and Cognitive Function Study (ACCOF; CX001621). The other authors have no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2023 Society for Vascular Surgery. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: The relationship between baseline Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) in patients with prior stroke and optimal timing of carotid revascularization is unclear. Therefore, we evaluated the timing of transfemoral carotid artery stenting (tfCAS), transcarotid artery revascularization (TCAR), and carotid endarterectomy (CEA) after prior stroke, stratified by preoperative mRS., Methods: We identified patients with recent stroke who underwent tfCAS, TCAR, or CEA between 2012 and 2021. Patients were stratified by preoperative mRS (0-1, 2, 3-4, or 5) and days from symptom onset to intervention (time to intervention; ≤2 days, 3-14 days, 15-90 days, and 91-180 days). First, we performed univariate analyses comparing in-hospital outcomes between separate mRS or time-to-intervention cohorts for all carotid intervention methods. Afterward, multivariable logistic regression was used to adjust for demographics and comorbidities across groups, and outcomes between the various intervention methods were compared. Primary outcome was the in-hospital stroke/death rate., Results: We identified 4260 patients who underwent tfCAS, 3130 patients who underwent TCAR, and 20,012 patients who underwent CEA. Patients were most likely to have minimal disability (mRS, 0-1 [61%]) and least likely to have severe disability (mRS, 5 [1.5%]). Patients most often underwent revascularization in 3 to 14 days (45%). Across all intervention methods, increasing preoperative mRS was associated with higher procedural in-hospital stroke/death (all P < .03), whereas increasing time to intervention was associated with lower stroke/death rates (all P < .01). After adjustment for demographics and comorbidities, undergoing tfCAS was associated with higher stroke/death compared with undergoing CEA (adjusted odds ratio, 1.6; 95% confidence interval, 1.3-1.9; P < .01) or undergoing TCAR (adjusted odds ratio, 1.3; 95% confidence interval, 1.0-1.8; P = .03)., Conclusions: In patients with preoperative stroke, optimal timing for carotid revascularization varies with stroke severity. Increasing preoperative mRS was associated with higher procedural in-hospital stroke/death rates, whereas increasing time to-intervention was associated with lower stroke/death rates. Overall, patients undergoing CEA were associated with lower in-hospital stroke/deaths. To determine benefit for delayed intervention, these results should be weighed against the risk of recurrent stroke during the interval before intervention., Competing Interests: Disclosures P.S. is a consultant to Surmodics, Cagent, Silk Road Medical, Philips, Medtronic, Boston Scientific. The remaining authors have no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2023 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Sex disparities in outcomes after carotid revascularization have long been a concern, with several studies demonstrating increased postoperative death and stroke for female patients after either carotid endarterectomy or transfemoral stenting. Adverse events after transfemoral stenting are higher in female patients, particularly in symptomatic cases. Our objective was to investigate outcomes after transcarotid artery revascularization (TCAR) stratified by patient sex hypothesizing that the results would be similar between males and females., Methods: We analyzed prospectively collected data from the Safety and Efficacy Study for Reverse Flow Used During Carotid Artery Stenting Procedure (ROADSTER)1 (pivotal), ROADSTER2 (US Food and Drug Administration indicated postmarket), and ROADSTER Extended Access TCAR trials. All patients had verified carotid stenosis meeting criteria for intervention (≥80% for asymptomatic patients and ≥50% in patient with symptomatic disease), and were included based on anatomical or clinical high-risk criteria for carotid stenting. Neurological assessments (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale, Modified Rankin Scale) were obtained before and within 24 hours from procedure end by an independent neurologist or National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale-certified nurse. Patients were stratified by sex (male vs female). Baseline demographics were compared using χ 2 and Fisher's exact tests where appropriate; primary outcomes were combination stroke/death (S/D) and S/D/myocardial infarction (S/D/M) at 30 days, and secondary outcomes were the individual components of S/D/M. Univariate logistic regression was conducted., Results: We included 910 patients for analysis (306 female [33.6%], 604 male [66.4%]). Female patients were more often <65 years old (20.6% vs 15%) or ≥80 years old (22.6% vs 20.2%) compared with males, and were more often of Black/African American ethnicity (7.5% vs 4.3%). There were no differences by sex in term of comorbidities, current or prior smoking status, prior stroke, symptomatic status, or prevalence of anatomical and/or clinical high-risk criteria. General anesthetic use, stent brands used, and procedure times did not differ by sex, although flow reversal times were longer in female patients (10.9 minutes male vs 12.4 minutes female; P = .01), as was more contrast used in procedures for female patients (43 mL male vs 48.9 mL female; P = .049). The 30-day S/D and S/D/M rates were similar between male and female patients (S/D, 2.7% male vs 1.6% female [P = .34]; S/D/M, 3.6% male vs 2.6% female [P = .41]), which did not differ when stratified by symptom status. Secondary outcomes did not differ by sex, including stroke rates at 30 days (2.2% male vs 1.6% female; P = .80), nor were differences seen with stratification by symptom status. Univariate analysis demonstrated that history of a prior ipsilateral stroke was associated with increased odds of S/D (odds ratio [OR], 4.19; P = .001) and S/D/M (OR, 2.78; P = .01), as was symptomatic presentation with increased odds for S/D (OR, 2.78; P = .02)., Conclusions: Prospective TCAR trial data demonstrate exceptionally low rates of S/D/MI, which do not differ by patient sex., Competing Interests: Disclosures P.A.S. served as a national Co-Principal Investigator for ROADSTER 2 without remuneration. Consultant for Silk Road Medical, Surmodics, Philips, Boston Scientific, Medtronic, Cagent, and LimFlow. C.J.K. served as a national Co-Principal Investigator for ROADSTER 1. V.S.K. served as a national Co-Principal Investigator for ROADSTER 2 without remuneration., (Copyright © 2023 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Recoil following balloon angioplasty of tibial arteries is a known mechanism of lumen loss and widely considered to be a contributing factor in early failure or later restenosis. The Serranator balloon has been designed to provide a controlled lumen gain while minimizing vessel injury. The objective of this study was to assess the ability to define and measure postangioplasty recoil in infrapopliteal arteries and to compare recoil after serration angioplasty and plain balloon angioplasty (POBA)., Methods: This multi-center, sequential comparative study included patients with de novo or restenotic lesions of infrapopliteal arteries up to 22 cm in length. Patients were enrolled sequentially and underwent alternating POBA or serration angioplasty with Serranator. The study captured angiographic imaging at pre, immediately post, and 15-minute after angioplasty. Vessel recoil, final diameter stenosis, and dissection were compared using core laboratory analysis., Results: This study enrolled 36 patients who underwent treatment of 39 infrapopliteal lesions. There was no significant difference between Serranator (n=20) and POBA (n=19) with respect to baseline demographics and lesion characteristics. Arterial recoil (>10%) occurred in 25% of Serranator-treated lesions versus 64% in POBA-treated lesions (p=0.02. Clinically relevant recoil (>30%) was present after serration angioplasty in 10% of patients and after POBA in 53% (p=0.01). There was no significant difference in technical success (100% for both), dissection rate between Serranator (5%) and POBA (5.2%)., Conclusions: Arterial recoil occurs after infrapopliteal angioplasty. Serration angioplasty produces substantially less arterial recoil compared with POBA. Additional studies are needed to assess whether reduced arterial recoil translates into superior long-term clinical outcomes., Clinical Impact: Prior studies have demonstrated over 90% recoil in patients after balloon angioplasty (POBA) of the infrapopliteal vessels, which significantly impacts the durability and impact of endovascular interventions in this clinical space. This study compared recoil after infrapopliteal angioplasty with serration angioplasty and POBA. Serration angioplasty produces substantially less arterial recoil compared with POBA. Additional studies are needed to assess whether reduced arterial recoil translates into superior long-term clinical outcomes., Competing Interests: Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe author(s) declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: PAS is a consultant for Cagent, Boston Scientific, Medtronic, Philips, Silk Road, LimFlow, Surmodics, Abbott (DSMB). RG is the Chief Technical Officer and VP Clinical Research at Cagent and a Cagent Vascular stockholder. ML is a Cagent Vascular stockholder. The rest of authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Background: Despite recent approval of several new agents, relapsed acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) remains challenging to treat. Sapanisertib (MLN0128/TAK-228) is an oral TORC1/2 inhibitor that exhibited preclinical activity against ALL., Methods: We conducted a single-arm multi-center Phase II study of sapanisertib monotherapy (3 mg orally daily of the milled formulation for 21 days every 28 days) in patients with ALL through the Experimental Therapeutics Clinical Trials Network (NCI-9775)., Results: Sixteen patients, 15 of whom were previously treated (median 3 prior lines of therapy), were enrolled. Major grade 3-4 non-hematologic toxicities included mucositis (3 patients) and hyperglycemia (2 patients) as well as hepatic failure, seizures, confusion, pneumonitis, and anorexia (1 patient each). Grade >2 hematological toxicity included leukopenia (3), lymphopenia (2), thrombocytopenia, and neutropenia (1). The best response was stable disease in 2 patients (12.5%), while only 3 patients (19%) were able to proceed to Cycle 2. Pharmacokinetic analysis demonstrated drug exposures similar to those observed in solid tumor patients. Immunoblotting in serially collected samples indicated limited impact of treatment on phosphorylation of mTOR pathway substrates such as 4EBP1, S6, and AKT., Conclusion: In summary, single-agent sapanisertib had a good safety profile but limited target inhibition or efficacy in ALL as a single agent. This trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov as NCT02484430., (© 2023 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background: Numerous randomised clinical trials and real-world studies have supported the safety of paclitaxel-coated devices for the treatment of femoropopliteal occlusive disease. However, a 2018 summary-level meta-analysis suggested an increased mortality risk for paclitaxel-coated devices compared with uncoated control devices. This study presents an updated analysis of deaths using the most complete and current data available from pivotal trials of paclitaxel-coated versus control devices., Methods: Ten trials comparing paclitaxel-coated versus control devices were included in a patient-level pooled analysis. Cox regression models were used to evaluate the effect of paclitaxel exposure on risk of death in both intention-to-treat (ITT; primary analysis) and three as-treated analysis sets accounting for treatment group crossover at the index procedure and over time. The effect of paclitaxel dose and baseline covariates were also evaluated., Findings: A total of 2666 participants were included with a median follow-up of 4·9 years. No significant increase in deaths was observed for patients treated with paclitaxel-coated devices. This was true in the ITT analysis (hazard ratio [HR] 1·14, 95% CI 0·93-1·40), the as-treated analysis (HR 1·13, 95% CI 0·92-1·39), and in two crossover analyses: 1·07 (0·87-1·31) when late crossovers were censored and 1·04 (0·84-1·28) when crossovers were analysed from the date of paclitaxel exposure. There was no significant effect of paclitaxel dose on mortality risk., Interpretation: This meta-analysis found no association between paclitaxel-coated device exposure and risk of death, providing reassurance to patients, physicians, and regulators on the safety of paclitaxel-coated devices., Funding: Becton Dickinson, Boston Scientific, Cook, Medtronic, Philips, Surmodics, and TriReme Medical., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests SAP serves on the advisory boards for Abbott Vascular, Boston Scientific, Cordis, Medtronic, and Philips; receives institutional research funding from Abbott Vascular, Boston Scientific, Surmodics, TriReme Medical, Shockwave Medical, Reflow Medical, Acotec and Concept Medical; and consults for Terumo, Inari, Penumbra and Canon. SAP has equity in Advanced Nanotherapies, eFemoral, and Encompass Vascular. PAS serves on the advisory boards for Philips, Boston Scientific, and Medtronic; and consults for Cagent, LimFlow, Silk Road Medical, Acotec, Endologix, and Surmodics. TR and CMM are employed by NAMSA, which was funded by an unrestricted grant from the industry consortium. WAG consults for Philips, Medtronic, Boston Scientific, Surmodics, Encompass Vascular, eFemoral, Cagent, Sonovascular, Conformal Medical, Contego Medical, ReValve, Alucent, and Edwards LifeSciences; and holds stock with eFemoral, Encompass Vascular, Xenter, and Reflow Medical., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Phosphorus recovery from human waste will help assure global food security, reduce environmental impact, and ensure effective stewardship of this limited and valuable resource. This can be accomplished by the precipitation of struvite (MgNH 4 PO 4 ·6H 2 O) in a two-zone reactor, continuously fed with nutrient-rich hydrolysed urine and a magnesium solution. The solid struvite crystals are periodically "harvested", removing accumulated crystal mass - and therefore recovered nutrients - from the process, and the operating campaign can, in principle, be continuously operated in a batch-continuous operating mode. A previously developed process model is augmented, incorporating two well-mixed volumes (upper zone and lower zone) that are coupled by intermixing forward and back flows. The intermixing back flow is parametrised and, therefore, adjusted for analysis. Crystal linear growth rate is modelled by a simple power-law kinetic, driven by the nutrient solution's saturation index (SI) of struvite. The instantaneous mass transfer rate of struvite constituents from liquid to solid phase is predicted, using the total interfacial area of the crystal population exposed to the well-mixed solution. This model describes a 12-L, laboratory reactor operated in the hybrid batch-continuous mode, although larger reactors could easily be accommodated, subject to their mixing behaviours. Experiments were performed at a 10-hour hydraulic residence time (HRT), which, importantly, is based on the volume of the well-mixed lower zone, since this is the volume of liquid that actively interacts with the suspended struvite crystals. The Mg/P feed molar ratio was varied (0.34, 0.64 and 1.29) to assess Mg feed rate-limiting behaviour. The concentration profiles of elemental P and Mg agree with experimentation, while P and Mg composition in the solid and X-ray diffraction support the production of struvite., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

Background: Recent studies suggesting increased late mortality with paclitaxel-coated devices (PCDs) in femoropopliteal peripheral vascular interventions (PVIs) prompted the US Food and Drug Administration to recommend limiting the use of PCDs to "patients at particularly high risk for restenosis". This study's aim is to characterize patients at high risk for restenosis and develop a risk score to guide clinicians in selecting patients for treatment with PCDs., Methods: Patients who underwent isolated femoropopliteal PVI for claudication or rest pain from 2016-2019 in the Vascular Quality Initiative were included. Patients who received intervention with a PCD, hybrid procedures, died within 1 year, or had missing follow-up data were excluded. The primary end point was clinical failure at 1 year defined as > 50% restenosis, loss of patency, reintervention, or major amputation. Data were split randomly into 2/3 for development and 1/3 for validation. A parsimonious multivariable hierarchical logistic regression for clinical failure was developed and a risk score was created using beta-coefficients. The risk score was applied to the validation dataset and tested for goodness-of-fit and discrimination., Results: Among 4,856 treated patients, 718 (14.8%) experienced clinical failure within 1 year. Clinical failure was associated with age ≤ 50 years, female sex (48.1% vs. 39.5%), insulin-dependent diabetes (29.9% vs. 23.1%), creatinine > 2.0 mg/dL (9.9% vs. 5.7%), prior ipsilateral lower extremity revascularization (48.5% vs. 38.5%), prior ipsilateral minor amputation (5.3% vs. 1.7%), rest pain versus claudication (30.8% vs. 18.7%), occlusion length ≥ 20 cm (18.8% vs. 15.0%), and Trans-Atlantic Inter-Society Consensus II Classification C or D (40.4% vs. 28.0%), all P ≤ 0.01. Risk score development was performed using a multivariable regression. The model demonstrated good fit and discrimination (C-statistic 0.71 in development and 0.72 in validation dataset). Predicted clinical failure was 8.9% for standard-risk (45.9% of interventions), 15.5% for high-risk (44.2% of interventions), and 33.8% for very high-risk patients (9.8% of interventions)., Conclusions: A novel risk score was created with good discrimination for identifying patients at high risk for clinical failure at 1 year after femoropopliteal PVI for claudication and rest pain. Patients at high risk and very high risk for clinical failure may benefit from alternative strategies including PCDs., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Acute iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis and chronic iliofemoral venous obstruction cause substantial patient harm and are increasingly managed with endovascular venous interventions, including percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy and stent placement. However, studies of these treatment elements have not been designed and reported with sufficient rigor to support confident conclusions about their clinical utility. In this project, the Trustworthy consensus-based statement approach was utilized to develop, via a structured process, consensus-based statements to guide future investigators of venous interventions. Thirty statements were drafted to encompass major topics relevant to venous study description and design, safety outcome assessment, efficacy outcome assessment, and topics specific to evaluating percutaneous venous thrombectomy and stent placement. Using modified Delphi techniques for consensus achievement, a panel of physician experts in vascular disease voted on the statements and succeeded in reaching the predefined threshold of >80% consensus (agreement or strong agreement) on all 30 statements. It is hoped that the guidance from these statements will improve standardization, objectivity, and patient-centered relevance in the reporting of clinical outcomes of endovascular interventions for acute iliofemoral deep venous thrombosis and chronic iliofemoral venous obstruction in clinical studies and thereby enhance venous patient care., Competing Interests: Disclosures Dr Vedantham receives nonfinancial research support (donation of compression stockings to study patients) from Medi USA. Dr Zelman Lewis is the President of EBQ Consulting, LLC. Dr Schneider is a consultant for Cagent, Boston Scientific, Limflow, Medtronic, Philips, Silk Road, and Surmodics. Dr Sabri is a consultant for Alucent Biomedical, Boston Scientific, and Medtronic. Dr Kolluri receives honoraria from Medtronic and is a consultant for Abbott Vascular, Auxetics, Avail, Boston Scientific Corporation, Inari Medical, Medtronic, Penumbra Medical, Surmodics, Syntactyx, and Prairie Education and Research Cooperative (PERC). The other authors report no conflicts.

Dissection occurring after percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) is associated with decreased vessel patency and an increased incidence of target lesion revascularization. Management of post-PTA dissection with the Tack Endovascular System (Philips, N.V., Amsterdam, Netherlands) has created an effective and durable treatment strategy for infrainguinal dissections. In this report, we discuss the indications and optimal methods for using Tack devices in post-PTA dissections., (© 2023 The Author(s).)

Nutrient recovery from wastewater is an effective strategy to prevent eutrophication and provide value for the treatment process. Human urine is a small but highly nutrient-rich stream in the total flux of domestic wastewater from which struvite (MgNH 4 PO 4.6 H 2 O) could be recovered and used as a fertiliser. Consequently, synthetic urine was used in most struvite precipitation studies, due to biohazard issues in real human urine. A modelling approach was developed to formulate synthetic urine recipes based on elemental urine composition, using matrix solving strategy to select and quantify chemical salts for synthetic urine preparation. The model also included mass balance, chemical speciation, and equilibrium dissociation expression for solution thermodynamics predictions in the formulated urine. In this study, synthetic solutions of fresh and stored urine were assessed with this model using Engineering Equation Solver (EES) software to calculate the quantity of salts, pH, ionic strength, and struvite saturation index. Simulation results in EES were successfully verified using PHREEQC simulations, while model validation comprised the examination of urine composition with their reported recipes.

How to identify follicular lymphoma (FL) patients with low disease burden but high risk for early progression is unclear. Building on a prior study demonstrating the early transformation of FLs with high variant allele frequency (VAF) BCL2 mutations at activation-induced cytidine deaminase (AICDA) sites, we examined 11 AICDA mutational targets, including BCL2, BCL6, PAX5, PIM1, RHOH, SOCS, and MYC, in 199 newly diagnosed grade 1 and 2 FLs. BCL2 mutations with VAF ≥20% occurred in 52% of cases. Among 97 FL patients who did not initially receive rituximab-containing therapy, nonsynonymous BCL2 mutations at VAF ≥20% were associated with increased transformation risk (HR 3.01, 95% CI 1.04-8.78, p = 0.043) and a trend toward shorter event-free survival (EFS, median 20 months with mutations versus 54 months without, p = 0.052). Other sequenced genes were less frequently mutated and did not increase the prognostic value of the panel. Across the entire population, nonsynonymous BCL2 mutations at VAF ≥20% were associated with decreased EFS (HR 1.55, 95% CI 1.02-2.35, p = 0.043 after correction for FLIPI and treatment) and decreased overall survival after median 14-year follow-up (HR 1.82, 95% CI 1.05-3.17, p = 0.034). Thus, high VAF nonsynonymous BCL2 mutations remain prognostic even in the chemoimmunotherapy era., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Objective: Current guidelines recommend dual antiplatelet (AP) therapy (DAPT) before carotid artery stenting (CAS); however, the true clinical effect of single AP therapy vs DAPT is unknown. We examined the efficacy and safety of preoperative single AP therapy vs DAPT in patients who had undergone transfemoral CAS (tfCAS) or transcarotid artery revascularization (TCAR)., Methods: We identified all patients who had undergone tfCAS or TCAR in the Vascular Quality Initiative database from 2016 to 2021. We stratified the patients by procedure and identified those who had received the following preoperative AP regimens: DAPT (acetylsalicylic acid [ASA] + P2Y12 inhibitor [P2Yi]), no AP therapy, ASA only, ASA + AP loading dose, P2Yi only, and P2Yi + AP loading dose. The AP loading dose was given within 4 hours of CAS. We generated propensity scores for each treatment regimen and assessed in-hospital outcomes using inverse probability weighted log binomial regression, with DAPT as the reference and adjusting for intraoperative protamine use. The primary efficacy outcome was a composite end point of stroke and death, and the primary safety outcome was access-related bleeding., Results: Of the 18,570 tfCAS patients, 70% had received DAPT, 5.6% no AP therapy, 10% ASA only, 8.0% ASA + AP loading dose, 4.6% P2Yi only, and 2.9% P2Yi + AP loading dose. The corresponding unadjusted rates of stroke/death were 2.2%, 6.8%, 4.1%, 5.1%, 2.4%, and 2.3%. After adjustment, compared with DAPT, the incidence of stroke/death was higher with no AP therapy (relative risk [RR], 2.3; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.7-3.2), ASA only (RR, 1.6; 95% CI, 1.2-2.1), and ASA + AP loading dose (RR, 2.0; 95% CI, 1.5-2.7) but was similar with P2Yi only (RR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.58-1.7) and P2Yi + AP loading dose (RR, 1.1; 95% CI, 0.49-2.5). Of the 25,459 TCAR patients, 81% had received DAPT, 2.0% no AP therapy, 5.5% ASA only, 3.5% ASA + AP loading dose, 4.9% P2Yi only, and 2.4% P2Yi + AP loading dose. The corresponding unadjusted rates of stroke/death were 1.5%, 3.3%, 3.3%, 2.9%, 1.2%, and 1.1%. After adjustment, compared with DAPT, the incidence of stroke/death was higher with no AP therapy (RR, 2.0; 95% CI, 1.2-3.3) and ASA only (RR, 2.2; 95% CI, 1.5-3.1), with a trend toward a higher incidence with ASA + AP loading dose (RR, 1.6; 95% CI, 0.99-2.6), and was similar with P2Yi only (RR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.54-1.8) and P2Yi + AP loading dose (RR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.27-1.6). No differences were found in the incidence of access-related bleeding between the treatment groups after tfCAS or TCAR., Conclusions: Compared with DAPT, no AP therapy or ASA monotherapy was associated with higher rates of stroke/death after CAS and should be discouraged as unsafe practice. Meanwhile, P2Yi monotherapy was associated with similar rates of stroke/death. No differences were found in the incidence of bleeding complications, and adding an AP loading dose to ASA or P2Yi monotherapy within 4 hours of the procedure did not affect the outcomes. Overall, these findings support the current guidelines recommending DAPT before CAS but also suggest that P2Yi monotherapy might confer thromboembolic benefits similar to those with DAPT. However, an immediate preoperative AP loading dose might not provide additional thromboembolic benefits., (Copyright © 2023 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Patients can be considered at high risk for carotid endarterectomy (CEA) because of either anatomic or physiologic factors and will often undergo transcarotid artery revascularization (TCAR). Patients with physiologic criteria will be considered to have a higher overall surgical risk because of more significant comorbidities. Our aim was to study the incidence of stroke, myocardial infarction (MI), death, and combined end points for patients who had undergone TCAR stratified by the risk factors (anatomic vs physiologic)., Methods: An analysis of prospectively collected data from the ROADSTER (pivotal; safety and efficacy study for reverse flow used during carotid artery stenting procedure), ROADSTER 2 (Food and Drug Administration indicated postmarket trial; postapproval study of transcarotid artery revascularization in patients with significant carotid artery disease), and ROADSTER extended access TCAR trials was performed. All 851 patients were considered to be at high risk for CEA and were included and stratified using high-risk anatomic criteria (ie, contralateral occlusion, tandem stenosis, high cervical artery stenosis, restenosis after previous endarterectomy, bilateral carotid stenting, hostile neck anatomy with previous neck irradiation, neck dissection, cervical spine immobility) or high-risk physiologic criteria (ie, age >75 years, multivessel coronary artery disease, history of angina, congestive heart failure New York Heart Association class III/IV, left ventricular ejection fraction <30%, recent MI, severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, permanent contralateral cranial nerve injury, chronic renal insufficiency). For trial inclusion, asymptomatic patients were required to have had ≥80% carotid stenosis and symptomatic patients to have had ≥50% stenosis. The primary outcome measures were stroke, death, and MI at 30 days. The data were statistically analyzed using the χ 2 test, as appropriate., Results: A total of 851 high surgical risk patients were categorized into two groups: those with anatomic-only risk factors (n = 372) or at least one physiologic risk factor present (n = 479). Of the 851 patients, 74.5% of those in the anatomic subset were asymptomatic, and 76.6% in the physiologic subset were asymptomatic. General anesthesia was used similarly in both groups (67.7% anatomic vs 68.1% physiologic). MI had occurred in eight patients in the physiologic group (1.7%), all of whom had been asymptomatic and in none of the anatomic patients (P = .01). The combined stroke, death, and MI rate was 2.1% in the anatomic cohort and 4.2% in the physiologic cohort (P = .10). Stratification of each group into asymptomatic and symptomatic patients did not yield any further differences., Conclusions: The patients who had undergone TCAR in the present prospective, neurologically adjudicated trial because of high-risk physiologic factors had had a higher rate of MI compared with the patients who had qualified for TCAR using anatomic criteria only. These patients had experienced comparable rates of combined stroke, death, and MI rates. The anatomic patients represented a healthier and younger subset of patients, with notably low overall event rates., (Copyright © 2022 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Despite the shared pathogenesis of peripheral arterial disease (PAD) and vascular dementia, there are little data on cognitive impairment in PAD patients. We hypothesized that cognitive impairment will be common and previously unrecognized., Methods: Cognitive impairment screening was prospectively performed for veterans presenting to a single Veterans Affairs outpatient vascular surgery clinic from 2020-2021 for PAD consultation or disease surveillance. Overall, 125 Veterans were screened. Cognitive impairment was defined as a score of <26 on the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) survey. A multivariable logistic regression assessed for independent risk factors for cognitive impairment., Results: Overall, 77 (61%) had cognitive impairment, 92% was previously unrecognized. Cognitive impairment was associated with increased age (74.4 vs. 71.8 years, P = 0.03), Black versus White race (94% vs. 54%, P < 0.01), hypertension (66% vs. 31%, P = 0.01), prior stroke/TIA (79% vs. 58%, P = 0.03), diabetes treated with insulin (79% vs. 58%, P = 0.05), and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) (80% vs. 57%, P = 0.04). On multivariable analysis, risk factors for newly diagnosed cognitive impairment included age ≥70 years, diabetes treated with insulin, PTSD, and Black race., Conclusions: Many veterans with PAD have evidence of cognitive impairment and is overwhelmingly underdiagnosed. This study suggests cognitive impairment is an unrecognized issue in a VA population with PAD, requiring more study to determine cognitive impairment's impact on surgical outcomes, and how it can be mitigated and incorporated into clinical care., (Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Objective: The SVS Wound, Ischemia, foot Infection (WIfI) limb staging system was established to estimate risk of major amputation in chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) and better stratify outcomes comparisons. There is little data on treatment outcomes beyond 1 year based on presenting WIfI stage., Methods: This is a single-institution retrospective study of 413 patients who underwent infrainguinal revascularization for CLTI (2011-2021) with data available for WIfI staging. Patient characteristics and outcomes were gathered from the electronic medical record. Data were analyzed based on presenting WIfI stage and initial treatment received at our center., Results: Presenting WIfI stages were 1 to 2 (23%), 3 (27%), and 4 (50%). Index revascularization approach was endoluminal (59%), autogenous vein bypass (29%), or non-autogenous bypass (13%). Operative mortality within 30 days was 2.9% and was not associated with WIfI stage or revascularization approach. Median limb follow-up time was 502 days (interquartile range [IQR], 112-1256 days), and median survival follow-up time was 932 days (IQR, 343-1770 days). Major amputation or death occurred in 19% and 46% of patients at median times of 119 days (IQR, 28-314 days) and 739 days (IQR, 204-1475 days), respectively. WIfI stage was independently associated with major amputation (P = .001), as was initial revascularization approach (P = .01). In a Cox proportional hazards model, factors independently associated with major amputation were male sex (hazard ratio [HR], 1.4; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.04-2.0; P = .03), diabetes (HR, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.3-2.5; P = .001), WIfI stage 4 (HR, 2.3; 95% CI, 1.5-3.5; P < .001), and non-autogenous bypass (HR, 2.9; 95% CI, 2.1-4.2; P < .001). In a Cox proportional hazards model for mortality, independently associated factors were age (HR, 1.04; 95% CI, 1.02-1.05; P < .001), end-stage renal disease (HR, 2.8; 95% CI, 1.9-4.0; P < .001), congestive heart failure (HR, 1.9; 95% CI, 1.4-2.5; P < .001), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (HR, 1.5; 95% CI, 1.1-2.1; P = .02), and WIfI stage 4 (HR, 1.6; 95% CI, 1.04-2.2; P = .03). Among those presenting with WIfI stage 4 limbs, Kaplan-Meier estimated rates of freedom from major amputation or death at 2 years were 71% ± 3.7% and 68% ± 3.5%, respectively. In an inverse propensity weighted Cox proportional hazards model, non-white race (HR, 1.5; 95% CI, 1.01-2.2; P = .047), diabetes (HR, 2.0; 95% CI, 1.2-3.3; P = .008), Global Anatomic Staging System infrapopliteal grade (HR, 1.2; 95% CI, 1.05-1.3; P = .005), non-autogenous bypass (HR, 3.2; 95% CI, 1.9-5.3; P < .001), and endoluminal revascularization (HR, 2.6; 95% CI, 1.6-4.3; P < .001) were independently associated with major amputation in the WIfI stage 4 subgroup., Conclusions: Presenting WIfI stage is strongly associated with long-term risks of major amputation and death following infrainguinal revascularization for CLTI and should be used to stratify outcomes comparisons. Effective revascularization is critical in WIfI stage 4 disease, and autogenous vein bypass provides durable long-term limb preservation., (Copyright © 2022 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Although the benefits of carotid endarterectomy (CEA) for treating symptomatic carotid stenosis are well known, the optimal timing of intervention after acute stroke and whether the optimal timing will vary with preoperative stroke severity has remained unclear. Therefore, we assessed the effect of stroke severity and timing of the intervention on the postoperative outcomes for patients who had undergone CEA for stroke., Methods: We identified all patients in the Vascular Quality Initiative who had undergone CEA from 2012 to 2020 for prior stroke. The patients were stratified using the preoperative modified Rankin scale score (mRS score, 0-5) and time to CEA after stroke onset (≤2 days, 3-14 days, 15-90 days, 91-180 days). After univariate comparisons, the patients were stratified into the following mRS cohorts for further analysis: 0 to 1, 2, 3 to 4, and 5. The primary outcome was in-hospital stroke/death., Results: We identified 15,601 patients, of whom 30% had had an mRS score of 0, 34% an mRS score of 1, 17% an mRS score of 2, 11% an mRS score of 3, 8% an mRS score of 4, and 1% an mRS score of 5. Overall, 9.3% of the patients had undergone CEA within ≤2 days, 46% within 3 to 14 days, 36% in 15 to 90 days, and 8.4% within 90 to 180 days. A decreasing mRS score and an increasing time to CEA were associated with lower rates of perioperative stroke/death (P trend  < .01). After risk adjustment, with CEA at 3 to 14 days as the comparator group, the mRS score 0 to 1 group had had a higher incidence of stroke/death after CEA within ≤2 days (3.6% vs 2.0%; odds ratio [OR], 1.8; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.2-2.7). The mRS score 2 group had had a similar incidence of stroke/death after CEA within ≤2 days (4.4% vs 3.9%; OR, 1.2; 95% CI, 0.6-2.3) but a lower incidence after CEA at 15 to 90 days (2.1% vs 3.9%; OR 0.5; 95% CI, 0.3-0.96). The mRS score 3 to 4 group had had a higher incidence of stroke/death after CEA within ≤2 days (8.0% vs 3.8%; OR, 2.4; 95% CI, 1.5-3.9) but a similar incidence of stroke/death after CEA at 15 to 90 days (3.0% vs 3.8%; OR, 0.8; 95% CI, 0.5-1.3). For the mRS score 5 group, the stroke/death rates were ≥6.5% across all the time to CEA groups. However, the low sample size limited meaningful comparisons., Conclusions: Patients with minimal disability after stroke (mRS score, 0-1) seemed to benefit from CEA within 3 to 14 days. However, those with severe disability (mRS score 5) have a very high risk from CEA at any time point given the poor outcomes. In contrast to the current guidelines, patients with mild disability (mRS score 2) could benefit from delaying CEA to 15 to 90 days, and those with moderate disability (mRS score 3-4) might benefit from CEA within 3 to 90 days given the acceptable in-hospital outcomes. These data should be considered within the context of the clinical situation in the weeks after index event to determine the net benefit of delayed CEA., (Copyright © 2022 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)