Back to Search
Start Over
Outcomes following carotid revascularization for stroke stratified by Modified Rankin Scale and time of intervention.
- Source :
-
Journal of vascular surgery [J Vasc Surg] 2024 Feb; Vol. 79 (2), pp. 287-296.e1. Date of Electronic Publication: 2023 Oct 28. - Publication Year :
- 2024
-
Abstract
- Objectives: The relationship between baseline Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) in patients with prior stroke and optimal timing of carotid revascularization is unclear. Therefore, we evaluated the timing of transfemoral carotid artery stenting (tfCAS), transcarotid artery revascularization (TCAR), and carotid endarterectomy (CEA) after prior stroke, stratified by preoperative mRS.<br />Methods: We identified patients with recent stroke who underwent tfCAS, TCAR, or CEA between 2012 and 2021. Patients were stratified by preoperative mRS (0-1, 2, 3-4, or 5) and days from symptom onset to intervention (time to intervention; ≤2 days, 3-14 days, 15-90 days, and 91-180 days). First, we performed univariate analyses comparing in-hospital outcomes between separate mRS or time-to-intervention cohorts for all carotid intervention methods. Afterward, multivariable logistic regression was used to adjust for demographics and comorbidities across groups, and outcomes between the various intervention methods were compared. Primary outcome was the in-hospital stroke/death rate.<br />Results: We identified 4260 patients who underwent tfCAS, 3130 patients who underwent TCAR, and 20,012 patients who underwent CEA. Patients were most likely to have minimal disability (mRS, 0-1 [61%]) and least likely to have severe disability (mRS, 5 [1.5%]). Patients most often underwent revascularization in 3 to 14 days (45%). Across all intervention methods, increasing preoperative mRS was associated with higher procedural in-hospital stroke/death (all P < .03), whereas increasing time to intervention was associated with lower stroke/death rates (all P < .01). After adjustment for demographics and comorbidities, undergoing tfCAS was associated with higher stroke/death compared with undergoing CEA (adjusted odds ratio, 1.6; 95% confidence interval, 1.3-1.9; P < .01) or undergoing TCAR (adjusted odds ratio, 1.3; 95% confidence interval, 1.0-1.8; P = .03).<br />Conclusions: In patients with preoperative stroke, optimal timing for carotid revascularization varies with stroke severity. Increasing preoperative mRS was associated with higher procedural in-hospital stroke/death rates, whereas increasing time to-intervention was associated with lower stroke/death rates. Overall, patients undergoing CEA were associated with lower in-hospital stroke/deaths. To determine benefit for delayed intervention, these results should be weighed against the risk of recurrent stroke during the interval before intervention.<br />Competing Interests: Disclosures P.S. is a consultant to Surmodics, Cagent, Silk Road Medical, Philips, Medtronic, Boston Scientific. The remaining authors have no conflicts of interest.<br /> (Copyright © 2023 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
- Subjects :
- Humans
Risk Factors
Risk Assessment
Time Factors
Stents
Carotid Arteries
Treatment Outcome
Retrospective Studies
Carotid Stenosis complications
Carotid Stenosis diagnostic imaging
Carotid Stenosis surgery
Endovascular Procedures adverse effects
Stroke diagnosis
Endarterectomy, Carotid adverse effects
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1097-6809
- Volume :
- 79
- Issue :
- 2
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- Journal of vascular surgery
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 38179993
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2023.10.041