Search

Purpose: In recent years, there has been significant advancement in the guidelines for recovery protocols involving heat or cold water immersion. Yet, comparison between the effects of hot and cold water immersion on key markers of neuromuscular recovery following exercise-induced muscle damage (EIMD) is lacking., Methods: Thirty physically active males completed an individualized and tailored EIMD protocol immediately followed by one of the following recovery interventions: cold water immersion (11 °C, CWI11), hot water immersion (41 °C, HWI41) or warm-bath control (36 °C, CON36). Gastrointestinal temperature was tracked throughout HWI41. Knee extensors' maximal isokinetic strength [peak torque (Tpeak)] and explosive strength [late-phase rate of force development, (RFD100-200)] were measured prior to EIMD (pre-), 24 h (post-24 h) and 48 h (post-48 h) post-EIMD. In addition, pressure pain threshold (PPT) was measured to quantify the recovery from muscle soreness. Surface electromyography signals (sEMG) from the vastus lateralis were captured to extract the rates of electromyography rise (REMGR) and the spectral power in the low-frequency band., Results: At post-48 h, Tpeak returned to baseline values following both CWI11 (-8.3 ± 6.8 %, p = 0.079) and HWI41 (-1.4 ± 4.1%, p = 1). In contrast, RFD100-200 (-2.3 ± 29.3%, p = 1) and PPT (+5.6 ± 14.6%, p = 1) returned to baseline values at post-48 h only following HWI41. Spectral analysis of the sEMG signal revealed that the low-frequency band was significantly increased following CWI11 (+9.0 ± 0.52%, p = 0.012). REMGR was unchanged regardless of the condition (all p > 0.05)., Conclusions: A single session of HWI41, rather than CWI11, improved the recovery of the late-phase rate of force development following EIMD in physically active males. This suggests that in athletic contexts where a rapid force development is a key performance determinant, hot bath should be preferred over cold bath., Competing Interests: Conflict of Interest and Funding Source: The authors report no conflicts of interest. No funding was received for this research is disclosed., (Copyright © 2024 by the American College of Sports Medicine.)

Purpose: Hot water immersion (HWI) has gained popularity to promote muscle recovery, despite limited data on the optimal heat dose. The purpose of this study was to compare the responses of two exogenous heat strains on core body temperature, hemodynamic adjustments, and key functional markers of muscle recovery following exercise-induced muscle damage (EIMD)., Methods: Twenty-eight physically active males completed an individually tailored EIMD protocol immediately followed by one of the following recovery interventions: HWI (40°C, HWI 40 ), HWI (41°C, HWI 41 ) or warm water immersion (36°C, CON 36 ). Gastrointestinal temperature (T gi ), hemodynamic adjustments (cardiac output [CO], mean arterial pressure [MAP], and systemic vascular resistance [SVR]), pre-frontal cortex deoxyhemoglobin (HHb), ECG-derived respiratory frequency, and subjective perceptual measures were tracked throughout immersion. In addition, functional markers of muscle fatigue (maximal concentric peak torque [T peak ]) and muscle damage (late-phase rate of force development [RFD 100-200 ]) were measured prior to EIMD (pre-), 24 h (post-24 h), and 48 h (post-48 h) post-EIMD., Results: By the end of immersion, HWI 41 led to significantly higher T gi values than HWI 40 (38.8 ± 0.1 vs. 38.0°C ± 0.6°C, p < 0.001). While MAP was well maintained throughout immersion, only HWI 41 led to increased (HHb) (+4.2 ± 1.47 μM; p = 0.005) and respiratory frequency (+4.0 ± 1.21 breath.min -1 ; p = 0.032). Only HWI 41 mitigated the decline in RFD 100-200 at post-24 h (-7.1 ± 31.8%; p = 0.63) and T peak at post-48 h (-3.1 ± 4.3%, p = 1)., Conclusion: In physically active males, maintaining a core body temperature of ~25 min within the range of 38.5°C-39°C has been found to be effective in improving muscle recovery, while minimizing the risk of excessive physiological heat strain., (© 2023 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

High-intensity training sessions are known to alter cardiac autonomic modulation. The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of whole-body cryotherapy, contrast water therapy and passive recovery on the time course of cardiac autonomic markers following a standardized HIT session. Eleven runners completed a high intensity session followed by one of the following recovery interventions: whole-body cryotherapy, contrast water therapy or passive recovery. Changes in cardiac autonomic modulation were assessed in supine and standing positions during an active tilt test at pre-, post-14 h and post-38 h. In supine, high-frequency power increased from pre- to post-14 h following whole-body cryotherapy (1661.1±914.5 vs. 2799.0±948.4 ms 2 , respectively; p=0.023) and contrast water therapy (1906.1±1327.9 vs. 4174.3±2762.9 ms 2 , respectively; p=0.004) whereas high frequency power decreased in response to passive recovery (p=0.009). In standing, low-frequency power increased from pre-to post-38 h (1784.3 ± 953.7 vs. 3339.8±1862.7 ms 2 , respectively; p=0.017) leading to an increase in total power from pre- to post-38 h (1990.8 ± 1089.4 vs. 3606.1±1992.0 ms 2 , respectively; p=0.017). Spectral analysis revealed that contrast water therapy appears to be a more efficient recovery strategy than whole-body cryotherapy in restoring cardiac autonomic homeostasis., Competing Interests: No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors., (Thieme. All rights reserved.)