Back to Search Start Over

Hot water immersion: Maintaining core body temperature above 38.5°C mitigates muscle fatigue.

Authors :
Sautillet B
Bourdillon N
Millet GP
Lemaître F
Cozette M
Delanaud S
Ahmaïdi S
Costalat G
Source :
Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports [Scand J Med Sci Sports] 2024 Jan; Vol. 34 (1), pp. e14503. Date of Electronic Publication: 2023 Sep 25.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Purpose: Hot water immersion (HWI) has gained popularity to promote muscle recovery, despite limited data on the optimal heat dose. The purpose of this study was to compare the responses of two exogenous heat strains on core body temperature, hemodynamic adjustments, and key functional markers of muscle recovery following exercise-induced muscle damage (EIMD).<br />Methods: Twenty-eight physically active males completed an individually tailored EIMD protocol immediately followed by one of the following recovery interventions: HWI (40°C, HWI <subscript>40</subscript> ), HWI (41°C, HWI <subscript>41</subscript> ) or warm water immersion (36°C, CON <subscript>36</subscript> ). Gastrointestinal temperature (T <subscript>gi</subscript> ), hemodynamic adjustments (cardiac output [CO], mean arterial pressure [MAP], and systemic vascular resistance [SVR]), pre-frontal cortex deoxyhemoglobin (HHb), ECG-derived respiratory frequency, and subjective perceptual measures were tracked throughout immersion. In addition, functional markers of muscle fatigue (maximal concentric peak torque [T <subscript>peak</subscript> ]) and muscle damage (late-phase rate of force development [RFD <subscript>100-200</subscript> ]) were measured prior to EIMD (pre-), 24 h (post-24 h), and 48 h (post-48 h) post-EIMD.<br />Results: By the end of immersion, HWI <subscript>41</subscript> led to significantly higher T <subscript>gi</subscript> values than HWI <subscript>40</subscript> (38.8 ± 0.1 vs. 38.0°C ± 0.6°C, p < 0.001). While MAP was well maintained throughout immersion, only HWI <subscript>41</subscript> led to increased (HHb) (+4.2 ± 1.47 μM; p = 0.005) and respiratory frequency (+4.0 ± 1.21 breath.min <superscript>-1</superscript> ; p = 0.032). Only HWI <subscript>41</subscript> mitigated the decline in RFD <subscript>100-200</subscript> at post-24 h (-7.1 ± 31.8%; p = 0.63) and T <subscript>peak</subscript> at post-48 h (-3.1 ± 4.3%, p = 1).<br />Conclusion: In physically active males, maintaining a core body temperature of ~25 min within the range of 38.5°C-39°C has been found to be effective in improving muscle recovery, while minimizing the risk of excessive physiological heat strain.<br /> (© 2023 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1600-0838
Volume :
34
Issue :
1
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
37747708
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1111/sms.14503