Search

The association of childhood cancer with Lynch syndrome is not established compared with the significant pediatric cancer risk in recessive constitutional mismatch repair deficiency syndrome (CMMRD).We describe the clinical features, germline analysis, and tumor genomic profiling of patients with Lynch syndrome among patients enrolled in pediatric cancer genomic studies.There were six of 773 (0.8%) pediatric patients with solid tumors identified with Lynch syndrome, defined as a germline heterozygous pathogenic variant in one of the mismatch repair (MMR) genes (three with MSH6, two with MLH1, and one with MSH2). Tumor analysis demonstrated evidence for somatic second hits and/or increased tumor mutation burden in three of four patients with available tumor with potential implications for therapy and identification of at-risk family members. Only one patient met current guidelines for pediatric cancer genetics evaluation at the time of tumor diagnosis.Approximately 1% of children with cancer have Lynch syndrome, which is missed with current referral guidelines, suggesting the importance of adding MMR genes to tumor and hereditary pediatric cancer panels. Tumor analysis may provide the first suggestion of an underlying cancer predisposition syndrome and is useful in distinguishing between Lynch syndrome and CMMRD.

Juvenile polyposis syndrome (JPS) is a clinically diagnosed hamartomatous polyposis syndrome that increases the risk of gastrointestinal cancer. Approximately 40%–50% of JPS is caused by a germline disease-causing variant (DCV) in the SMAD4 or BMPR1A genes. The aim of this study was to characterize the phenotype of DCV-negative JPS and compare it with DCV-positive JPS. Herein, we analyzed a cohort of 145 individuals with JPS from nine institutions, including both pediatric and adult centers. Data analyzed included age at diagnosis, family history, cancer history, need for colectomy/gastrectomy, and polyp number and location. Compared with DCV-positive JPS, DCV-negative JPS was associated with younger age at diagnosis (P < 0.001), lower likelihood of having a family history of JPS (P < 0.001), and a lower risk of colectomy (P = 0.032). None of the DCV-negative individuals had gastric or duodenal polyps, and polyp burden decreased after the first decade compared with DCV-positive JPS. Subgroup analysis between SMAD4 and BMPR1A carriers showed that SMAD4 carriers were more likely to have a family history of JPS and required gastrectomy. Taken together, these data provide the largest phenotypic characterization of individuals with DCV-negative JPS to date, showing that this group has distinct differences compared with JPS due to a SMAD4 or BMPR1A variant. Better understanding of phenotype and cancer risk associated with JPS both with and without a DCV may ultimately allow for individualized management of polyposis and cancer risk. Prevention Relevance: Juvenile Polyposis Syndrome (JPS) is a gastrointestinal cancer predisposition syndrome requiring lifelong surveillance, however there is limited data comparing individuals with and without a germline disease-causing variant in SMAD4 or BMPR1A. Herein we show that individuals with JPS without an underlying disease-causing variant have distinct phenotypic differences including lack of upper gastrointestinal polyps and lower rates of a family history of JPS, suggesting that a different approach to management may be appropriate in this population.

Pediatric oncologists’ perspectives around returning and incorporating tumor and germline genomic sequencing (GS) results into cancer care are not well-described. To inform optimization of cancer genomics communication, we assessed oncologists’ experiences with return of genomic results (ROR), including their preparation/readiness for ROR, collaboration with genetic counselors (GCs) during ROR, and perceived challenges. The BASIC3 study paired pediatric oncologists with GCs to return results to patients’ families. We thematically analyzed 24 interviews with 12 oncologists at two post-ROR time points. Oncologists found pre-ROR meetings with GCs and geneticists essential to interpreting patients’ reports and communicating results to families. Most oncologists took a collaborative ROR approach where they discussed tumor findings and GCs discussed germline findings. Oncologists perceived many roles for GCs during ROR, including answering families’ questions and describing information in lay language. Challenges identified included conveying uncertain information in accessible language, limits of oncologists’ genetics expertise, and navigating families’ emotional responses. Oncologists emphasized how GCs’ and geneticists’ support was essential to ROR, especially for germline findings. GS can be successfully integrated into cancer care, but to account for the GC shortage, alternative ROR models and access to genetics resources will be needed to better support families and avoid burdening oncologists.

BACKGROUND: Despite being the most common central nervous system tumor in children, ≤5% of pediatric low grade gliomas (pLGG) present with metastases. Due to their rarity, there is a paucity of clinical and molecular data in metastatic pLGGs. To address the need, we analyzed a cohort of 22 patients with pLGG followed at Texas Children’s Hospital who presented with metastatic disease. RESULTS: The predominant histology was pilocytic astrocytoma (16/22, 73%); average age at diagnosis was 4 years 11 months. The most common sites of primary disease were optic pathway/chiasm (7/22, 32%) and suprasellar (5/22, 23%). Metastatic disease was most commonly noted in the leptomeninges (12/22, 55%). 16/22 patients (73%) were treated with up-front medical therapy following tumor biopsy/resection, the majority with carboplatin-based therapy; the remaining 6 patients received only surgery up-front. Only 2/22 patients (9%) did not progress after their initial treatment with an average follow-up of 42 months. 14 patients (14/22, 64%) had continued disease progression after at least 2 therapeutic interventions; however, only 3 patients (3/22, 14%) eventually received craniospinal radiation. 10 patients (10/22, 45%) received treatment with an agent targeting the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway. 20/22 patients (91%) were alive at last follow-up (average 72 months). 4/21 patients (19%) harbored a BRAF V600E mutation while 7/20 (35%) had a BRAF::KIAA1549 duplication/fusion. 8/20 patients (40%) were wildtype for both analyzed molecular alterations in BRAF. 8 patients had germline whole exome sequencing performed and all were negative for pathogenic/likely-pathogenic variants related to their clinical phenotype. Methylation analyses are pending on patients with available tumor tissue. CONCLUSION: In our cohort of patients with metastatic pLGG, most tumors progressed despite numerous therapeutic regimens, but the overall survival was >90%. 40% of patients were wild type for the 2 most common MAPK alterations seen in pLGG.

The myogenic differentiation 1 gene (MYOD1) p.L122R somatic mutation was first discovered in a subset of clinically aggressive embryonal rhabdomyosarcomas and has since been described in both pediatric and adult spindle cell/sclerosing rhabdomyosarcomas. Relatively little is known about the clinical, molecular, and histopathological features of these tumors in children. In order to further characterize the genomic and clinical features of pediatric MYOD1-mutant sarcomas, we evaluated a cohort of soft-tissue sarcoma patients treated at Texas Children's Hospital. Tumor DNA was subjected to next-generation panel sequencing and/or Sanger sequencing of the MYOD1 hotspot mutation. The MYOD1 p.L122R mutation was identified in six tumors, with a variant allele fraction greater than 0.8 in three cases, suggestive of loss of heterozygosity. One sclerosing rhabdomyosarcoma lacking the MYOD1 hotspot mutation was observed to have a MYOD1 copy number gain, also with evidence of loss of heterozygosity. Cancer gene panel sequencing revealed potentially targetable alterations in six of seven (86%) patients with MYOD1 alterations, including four patients with an alteration in the PI3K-AKT pathway: two hotspot PIK3CA mutations and deletions in PTEN and TSC2. On histopathologic review, MYOD1-altered tumors exhibited spindle and/or round cells and varying degrees of hyaline sclerosis. At last follow-up, six patients had died of disease and the seventh progressed early and was subsequently lost to follow-up. Both pre- and post-therapy patient-derived xenograft models were generated from one patient's tumor. These models were confirmed to harbor the MYOD1 and PIK3CA mutations seen in the primary tumor and were shown to be sensitive to PI3K/mTOR inhibition in vitro and in vivo. In conclusion, this study adds to recent reports describing the clinicopathologic and genomic features of MYOD1-altered soft-tissue sarcomas in children, including dismal prognosis and potential molecular targets for therapy. The novel preclinical models developed will facilitate further biological and preclinical study of this rare and aggressive tumor. © 2021 The Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

The development of massively parallel sequencing–based genomic sequencing tests has increased genetic test availability and access. The field and practice of genetic counseling have adapted in response to this paradigm-shifting technology and the subsequent transition to practicing genomic medicine. While the key elements defining genetic counseling remain relevant, genetic counseling service delivery models and practice settings have evolved. Genetic counselors are addressing the challenges of direct-to-consumer and consumer-driven genetic testing, and genetic counseling training programs are responding to the ongoing increased demand for genetic counseling services across a broadening range of contexts. The need to diversify both the patient and participant groups with access to genetic information, as well as the field of genetic counseling, is at the forefront of research and training program initiatives. Genetic counselors are key stakeholders in the genomics era, and their contributions are essential to effectively and equitably deliver precision medicine.

Genomic sequencing results need to be effectively communicated across all populations and practice settings. Projects in the Clinical Sequencing Evidence-Generating Research (CSER) consortium enroll diverse racial/ethnic and medically underserved participants across various clinical contexts. This article explores a set of CSER results disclosure cases to expand the evidence base on experiences returning genomic results. Case details were collected using a structured set of questions. We identified common themes in the case set, and assessed challenges and strategies in achieving six relevant results disclosure objectives. CSER-affiliated patient/community stakeholder impressions of the findings were solicited via video conference calls. Seventeen cases across six CSER projects were included. Case themes sorted into four categories: (1) factors influencing participant understanding, (2) participant emotional response, (3) disease burden, and (4) logistical challenges. Challenges meeting results disclosure objectives included a lack of dialogue, health literacy level, unexpected findings, and complex concepts. Strategies were consistent with traditional genetic counseling practice, but also highlighted approaches being evaluated in CSER projects. Patient/community stakeholders supported the identified themes and provided additional suggestions to improve patient understanding and engagement. These experiences add valuable insights into adapting genomic results disclosure practices to best serve all patient populations.

The descriptor 'usual care' refers to standard or routine care. Yet, no formal definition exists. The need to define what constitutes usual care arises in clinical research. Often one arm in a trial represents usual care in comparison with a novel intervention. Accordingly, usual care in genetic counseling research appears predominantly in randomized controlled trials. Recent standards for reporting genetic counseling research call for standardization, but do not address usual care. We (1) inventoried all seven studies in the Clinical Sequencing Evidence-Generating Consortium (CSER) about how genetic counseling was conceptualized, conducted, and whether a usual care arm was involved; (2) conducted a review of published randomized control trials in genetic counseling, comparing how researchers describe usual care groups; and (3) reviewed existing professionally endorsed definitions and practice descriptions of genetic counseling. We found wide variation in the content and delivery of usual care. Descriptions frequently detailed the content of usual care, most often noting assessment of genetic risk factors, collecting family histories, and offering testing. A minority included addressing psychological concerns or the risks versus benefits of testing. Descriptions of how care was delivered were vague except for mode and type of clinician, which varied. This significant variation, beyond differences expected among subspecialties, reduces the validity and generalizability of genetic counseling research. Ideally, research reflects clinical practice so that evidence generated can be used to improve clinical outcomes. To address this objective, we propose a definition of usual care in genetic counseling research that merges common elements from the National Society of Genetic Counselors' practice definition, the Reciprocal Engagement Model, and the Accreditation Council for Genetic Counselors' practice-based competencies. Promoting consistent execution of usual care in the design of genetic counseling trials can lead to more consistency in representing clinical care and facilitate the generation of evidence to improve it.

Background: Although genomic changes identified by clinical tumor sequencing may be present in the germline, precision oncology trials have generally not incorporated germline testing and reporting. We describe our experience with clinical reporting of matched tumor and germline results from the NCI-COG Pediatric Molecular Analysis for Therapy Choice (MATCH) trial (NCT03155620). Design/Method: Patients age 1 to 21 years old with treatment-refractory solid tumors, non-Hodgkin lymphomas, or histiocytic disorders were eligible. DNA and RNA extracted from FFPE tumors were sequenced using Oncomine Assay v.3 with reporting of potentially actionable fusions, amplifications, and mutations, including loss of function variants in tumor suppressor genes. Germline reporting focused on 36 genes from the same DNA panel that convey adult or pediatric cancer susceptibility but does not include all cancer susceptibility genes (e.g. APC, DICER1). Deletions and splice site variants were not reported. Results: As of June 2020, 1009 patients had been enrolled from 132 COG sites, with tumor and germline testing complete for 868 patients to date. Overall, 62 (7.1%) germline reports included a pathogenic or likely pathogenic germline variant (termed germline findings) in 18 cancer susceptibility genes. This frequency was similar in patients with solid tumors (46/633, 7.3%), CNS tumors (14/204, 6.9%), and lymphomas/histiocytoses (2/31, 6.5%). Variant(s) of potential germline significance were identified in 25% of tumor reports; of these, 74% (163/221) had no germline findings. The proportion of germline findings for genes with >10 reported tumor variants varied: 32% (7/22) in NF1, 25% (3/12) in RB1, 16% (17/108) in TP53 and 0% in ALK (0/21) and PTEN (0/12). Of note, 82% (14/17) of tumor variants in breast cancer susceptibility genes (BRCA1/2, CHEK2 and PALB2) had germline findings. On study intake forms, 25% of patients with germline findings had a “known genetic disease” reported. Oncologists caring for patients with a germline finding were then queried about prior knowledge of a genetic diagnosis. Of 24 respondents, 13 (54%) reported no prior molecular diagnosis of the identified condition. Conclusions: Coordinated germline and tumor testing revealed clinically relevant cancer susceptibility variants across a spectrum of genes in 7% of pediatric patients with treatment-refractory cancers. This is likely an underestimate of germline findings given test limitations. The parallel tumor/normal reporting approach minimized the need for targeted reflex genetic testing in 19% of study participants and provided new information on cancer susceptibility in germline positive patients to half of the responding oncologists. The NCI-COG Pediatric MATCH trial reporting process can serve as a model for precision oncology trials and clinical tumor profiling. Citation Format: Sarah Scollon, Sharon E. Plon, Steven Joffe, Jaclyn A. Biegel, Shashikant Kulkarni, George Miles, David Patton, Brent Coffey, Paul M. Williams, Gregory J. Tsongalis, Mark J. Routbort, Julie M. Gastier-Foster, Lauren Saguilig, Jin Piao, Todd A. Alonzo, Katherine A. Janeway, Peter C. Adamson, Margaret Mooney, James V. Tricoli, Nita L. Seibel, Donald W. Parsons. Germline cancer predisposition results from the National Cancer Institute - Children's Oncology Group (NCI-COG) Pediatric MATCH Trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2021; 2021 Apr 10-15 and May 17-21. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(13_Suppl):Abstract nr 631.

Aim: Describe modifications to technical genomic terminology made by interpreters during disclosure of whole exome sequencing (WES) results. Patients & methods: Using discourse analysis, we identified and categorized interpretations of genomic terminology in 42 disclosure sessions where Spanish-speaking parents received their child's WES results either from a clinician using a medical interpreter, or directly from a bilingual physician. Results: Overall, 76% of genomic terms were interpreted accordantly, 11% were misinterpreted and 13% were omitted. Misinterpretations made by interpreters and bilingual physicians included using literal and nonmedical terminology to interpret genomic concepts. Conclusion: Modifications to genomic terminology made during interpretation highlight the need to standardize bilingual genomic lexicons. We recommend Spanish terms that can be used to refer to genomic concepts.

An understanding of the role of inherited cancer predisposition syndromes in pediatric tumor diagnoses continues to develop as more information is learned through the application of genomic technology. Identifying patients and their relatives at an increased risk for developing cancer is an important step in the care of this patient population. The purpose of this review is to highlight various tumor types that arise in the pediatric population and the cancer predisposition syndromes associated with those tumors. The review serves as a guide for recognizing genes and conditions to consider when a pediatric cancer referral presents to the genetics clinic.

BACKGROUND: Ultrahypermutation (>100 mutations/Mb) is rare in childhood cancer genomes and is primarily seen in patients with constitutional mismatch repair deficiency (cMMRD) caused by biallelic germline mutations in DNA mismatch repair (MMR) genes. We report a child with clinical features of cMMRD and an ultrahypermutated medulloblastoma found to harbor a germline mutation in DNA polymerase epsilon (POLE). CASE PRESENTATION: A 5-year-old female presented with clinical features of cMMRD including a malignant brain tumor, >100 hyperpigmented skin papules and café-au-lait macules, and axillary freckling. Additionally, she had a renal cyst, tibial osteochondroma, and 3 subcutaneous nodules. Pathology of the brain mass revealed non-WNT/non-SHH anaplastic medulloblastoma with tumor cells retaining MMR protein expression by immunohistochemistry. GENETIC ANALYSES: Germline genetic analysis of MMR genes revealed no pathogenic mutations. Targeted next-generation sequencing with a 124-cancer gene panel covering ≈1 Mb revealed an ultrahypermutated tumor genome (>150 mutations/Mb) and a mutation signature resembling “signature 10” (Campbell et al., Cell 2017), which is strongly associated with POLE exonuclease domain mutations. Analysis of matched tumor and blood DNA with an expanded 981-cancer gene panel demonstrated a germline heterozygous POLE missense variant (NM_006231.3:c.1366G>C; p.A456P) in the exonuclease domain, previously only reported as a somatic pathogenic variant in hypermutated cancers. The tumor additionally had a somatic heterozygous MSH6 nonsense variant (NM_000179.2:c.2722G>T; p.E908X). DISCUSSION: We report this early-onset brain tumor in a patient with phenotypic features of cMMRD, and a germline POLE p.A456P mutation. Heterozygous germline missense variants in the POLE exonuclease domain cause Polymerase Proofreading-associated Polyposis (PPAP), a cancer predisposition syndrome associated with colorectal polyposis and early-onset, microsatellite-stable colorectal cancer. Several brain tumors have been reported in patients with PPAP including pediatric astrocytoma. Dermatologic features and mutation signature analysis of hypermutated tumors may be associated with germline mutations in either the MMR or polymerase proofreading pathways.

Ultra-hypermutation (>100 mutations/Mb) is rare in childhood cancer genomes and has been primarily reported in patients with constitutional mismatch repair deficiency (CMMRD) caused by biallelic germline mismatch repair (MMR) gene mutations. We report a 5-yr-old child with classic clinical features of CMMRD and an ultra-hypermutated medulloblastoma with retained MMR protein expression and absence of germline MMR mutations. Mutational signature analysis of tumor panel sequencing data revealed a canonical DNA polymerase-deficiency-associated signature, prompting further genetic testing that uncovered a germline POLE p.A456P missense variant, which has previously been reported as a recurrent somatic driver mutation in cancers. This represents the earliest known onset of malignancy in a patient with a germline mutation in the POLE proofreading polymerase. The clinical features in this child, virtually indistinguishable from those of CMMRD, suggest that polymerase-proofreading deficiency should be considered in the differential diagnosis of CMMRD patients with retained MMR function.

Objective To examine communication patterns and behaviors during disclosure of exome sequencing (ES) results to parents of pediatric cancer patients, and describe common themes in parental communication. Methods Using mixed methods, we analyzed transcripts of sessions where parents of pediatric cancer patients received ES results from an oncologist and genetic counselor. Seventy-six transcripts were analyzed for frequency of clinician information-giving, partnering-supportive talk, and active parent participation. A subset of 40 transcripts were analyzed using thematic content analysis. Results Disclosures consisted mostly of clinician talk (84% of total talk), which was focused on providing information (62% of clinicians’ utterances) with occasional partnering-supportive talk (7% of clinicians’ utterances). Most parents assumed a passive, listening role (16% of total talk). Themes in parental communication included expressing relief and the significance of an answer, concern about sharing results and responsibility for inheritance, and seeking clarification of health implications of results. Conclusion Our finding of low levels of active parent participation during ES disclosures highlights the need to improve patient/parent engagement and understanding in a genetic setting. Practice implications Clinician communication strategies that could encourage parent participation and understanding include checking for parent understanding, partnership-building, and tailoring ES discussions to address parent concerns and preferences.

© 2018 American Society of Human Genetics The Clinical Sequencing Evidence-Generating Research (CSER) consortium, now in its second funding cycle, is investigating the effectiveness of integrating genomic (exome or genome) sequencing into the clinical care of diverse and medically underserved individuals in a variety of healthcare settings and disease states. The consortium comprises a coordinating center, six funded extramural clinical projects, and an ongoing National Human Genome Research Institute (NHGRI) intramural project. Collectively, these projects aim to enroll and sequence over 6,100 participants in four years. At least 60% of participants will be of non-European ancestry or from underserved settings, with the goal of diversifying the populations that are providing an evidence base for genomic medicine. Five of the six clinical projects are enrolling pediatric patients with various phenotypes. One of these five projects is also enrolling couples whose fetus has a structural anomaly, and the sixth project is enrolling adults at risk for hereditary cancer. The ongoing NHGRI intramural project has enrolled primarily healthy adults. Goals of the consortium include assessing the clinical utility of genomic sequencing, exploring medical follow up and cascade testing of relatives, and evaluating patient-provider-laboratory level interactions that influence the use of this technology. The findings from the CSER consortium will offer patients, healthcare systems, and policymakers a clearer understanding of the opportunities and challenges of providing genomic medicine in diverse populations and settings, and contribute evidence toward developing best practices for the delivery of clinically useful and cost-effective genomic sequencing in diverse healthcare settings.

Objectives To describe how linguistic tools used by interpreters during return of genomic sequencing results may have impacted communication with Spanish-speaking families, and to discuss the implications for the role of medical interpreters. Methods Using discourse analysis, we identified and categorized the various ways hospital-based interpreters adapted clinicians’ language in 37 audio-recorded sessions in which Spanish-speaking parents participating in a clinical trial received their child’s genomic sequencing results from English-speaking clinicians. Results We found that interpreters adapted clinicians’ statements using five empathic linguistic tools: contextualization, encouragement, checking comprehension, endearment, and softening. Interpreters used an average of four linguistic tools per session, with contextualization and encouragement being the most frequently used. Conclusions Interpreters used empathic linguistic tools to alter clinicians’ statements when communicating genomic information to Spanish-speaking families. Our findings demonstrate the critical role of interpreters as cultural mediators and facilitators of understanding for Spanish-speaking families. Practice implications This study expands upon the definition of clinical empathy in interpreter-mediated sessions. Our findings suggest that revisions of standards of medical interpretation practice may be warranted regarding interpreters’ ability to adapt clinicians’ language in a culturally sensitive manner during interpretation.

Clinical and research settings are increasingly incorporating genomic sequencing (GS) technologies. Previous research has explored reasons for declining genetic testing and participation in genetic studies; however, there is a dearth of literature regarding why potential participants decline participation in GS research, and if any of these reasons are unique to GS. This knowledge is essential to promote informed decision-making and identify potential barriers to research participation and clinical implementation. We aggregated data from seven sites across the National Institutes of Health's Clinical Sequencing Exploratory Research (CSER) consortium on each project's procedures for recruitment, and rates of and reasons for decline. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. The decline rate for enrollment at the seven CSER sites ranged from 12 to 64% (median 28%) and varied based on age and disease status. Projects differed in their protocols for approaching potential participants and obtaining informed consent. Reasons for declining GS research were reported for 1088 potential participants. Commonly cited reasons were similar to those reported for clinical single gene testing and non-GS genetic research. The most frequently cited reason for decline was study logistics (35%); thus, addressing logistical barriers to enrollment may positively impact GS study recruitment. Privacy and discrimination concerns were cited by 13% of decliners, highlighting the need for researchers and providers to focus educational efforts in this area. The potential psychological burden of pursuing and receiving results from GS and not wanting to receive secondary findings, a concern specific to GS, have been cited as concerns in the literature. A minority of potential participants cited psychological impact (8%) or not wanting to receive secondary findings (2%) as reasons for decline, suggesting that these concerns were not major barriers to participation in these GS studies. Further research is necessary to explore the impact, if any, of different participant groups or study protocols on rates of decline for GS studies. Future studies exploring GS implementation should consider using standardized collection methods to examine reasons for decline in larger populations and more diverse healthcare settings.

Despite the increased utilization of genome and exome sequencing, little is known about the actual content and process of informed consent for sequencing. We addressed this by interviewing 29 genetic counselors and research coordinators experienced in obtaining informed consent for sequencing in research and clinical settings. Interviews focused on the process and content of informed consent; patients/participants' common questions, concerns and misperceptions; and challenges to obtaining informed consent. Content analysis of transcribed interviews revealed that the main challenges to obtaining consent related to the broad scope and uncertainty of results, and patient/participants' unrealistic expectations about the likely number and utility of results. Interviewees modified their approach to sessions according to contextual issues surrounding the indication for testing, type of patient, and timing of testing. With experience, most interviewees structured sessions to place less emphasis on standard elements in the consent form and technological aspects of sequencing. They instead focused on addressing misperceptions and helping patients/participants develop realistic expectations about the types and implications of possible results, including secondary findings. These findings suggest that informed consent sessions should focus on key issues that may be misunderstood by patients/participants. Future research should address the extent to which various stakeholders agree on key elements of informed consent.

Whole genome and exome sequencing tests are increasingly being ordered in clinical practice, creating a need for research exploring the return of results from these tests. A goal of the Clinical Sequencing and Exploratory Research (CSER) consortium is to gain experience with this process to develop best practice recommendations for offering exome and genome testing and returning results. Genetic counselors in the CSER consortium have an integral role in the return of results from these genomic sequencing tests and have gained valuable insight. We present seven emerging themes related to return of exome and genome sequencing results accompanied by case descriptions illustrating important lessons learned, counseling challenges specific to these tests and considerations for future research and practice.

As the use of genomic technology has expanded in research and clinical settings, issues surrounding informed consent for genome and exome sequencing have surfaced. Despite the importance of informed consent, little is known about the specific challenges that professionals encounter when consenting patients or research participants for genomic sequencing. We interviewed 29 genetic counselors and research coordinators with considerable experience obtaining informed consent for genomic sequencing to understand their experiences and perspectives. As part of this interview, 24 interviewees discussed an informed consent case they found particularly memorable or challenging. We analyzed these case examples to determine the primary issue or challenge represented by each case. Challenges fell into two domains: participant understanding, and facilitating decisions about testing or research participation. Challenges related to participant understanding included varying levels of general and genomic literacy, difficulty managing participant expectations, and contextual factors that impeded participant understanding. Challenges related to facilitating decision-making included complicated family dynamics such as disagreement or coercion, situations in which it was unclear whether sequencing research would be a good use of participant time or resources, and situations in which the professional experienced disagreement or discomfort with participant decisions. The issues highlighted in these case examples are instructive in preparing genetics professionals to obtain informed consent for genomic sequencing.

In the pediatric clinical setting, the parent/guardian will almost always be the authorized representative and designated recipient of clinical and research results, making the issue of to whom results should be returned in the pediatric setting less complex than in adult settings. It is also clear that, in genomic research related to pediatric diseases such as cancer, results may be of considerable clinical, ethical, and personal significance for parents in a number of ways, including a genomic explanation of the origin of their child’s cancer, implications for the genetic testing and medical care of other siblings and of the parents themselves, and reproductive planning with regard to the recurrence risk for future children to have an increased risk of cancer. However, what remains unclear is which results should be disclosed, and under what circumstances, to parents of deceased children.

Hereditary gastrointestinal cancer predisposition syndromes have been well characterized, but management strategies and surveillance remain a major challenge, especially in childhood. In October 2016, the American Association for Cancer Research organized the AACR Childhood Cancer Predisposition Workshop in which international experts in care of children with a hereditary risk of cancer met to define surveillance strategies and management of children with cancer predisposition syndromes. In this article, we review the current literature in polyposis syndromes that can be diagnosed in childhood and may be associated with an increased incidence of gastrointestinal neoplasms and other cancer types. These disorders include adenomatous polyposis syndromes (APC and MUTYH), juvenile polyposis coli (BMPR1A and SMAD4), Peutz–Jeghers Syndrome (STK11/LKB1), and PTEN hamartoma tumor syndrome (PHTS; PTEN), which can present with a more limited juvenile polyposis phenotype. Herein, the panel of experts provides recommendations for clinical diagnosis, approach to genetic testing, and focus on cancer surveillance recommendations when appropriate during the pediatric period. We also review current controversies on genetic evaluation of patients with hepatoblastoma and indications for surveillance for this tumor. Childhood cancer risks and surveillance associated with disorders involving the mismatch repair genes, including Lynch syndrome and constitutional mismatch repair deficiency (CMMRD), are discussed elsewhere in this series. Clin Cancer Res; 23(13); e107–e14. ©2017 AACR. See all articles in the online-only CCR Pediatric Oncology Series.

As the understanding of the genetic etiology of childhood cancers increases, the need for the involvement of experts familiar with the provision of genetic counseling for this population is paramount. In October 2016, the American Association for Cancer Research organized the AACR Childhood Cancer Predisposition Workshop in which international experts in pediatric cancer predisposition met to establish surveillance guidelines for children with cancer predisposition. Identifying for whom, when, why, and how these cancer predisposition surveillance guidelines should be implemented is essential. Genetic counselors invited to this workshop provide a genetic counseling framework for oncology professionals in this article. Points of entry and recommendations regarding the provision and timing of the initial and subsequent genetic counseling sessions are addressed. The genetic counseling and testing processes are reviewed, and the psychologic impact related to surveillance is explored. Pediatric cancer genetics will continue to grow and evolve as a field, and genetic counseling services will be vital to ensure appropriate identification and management of at-risk children moving forward. Clin Cancer Res; 23(13); e91–e97. ©2017 AACR. See all articles in the online-only CCR Pediatric Oncology Series.

Leukemia, the most common childhood cancer, has long been recognized to occasionally run in families. The first clues about the genetic mechanisms underlying familial leukemia emerged in 1990 when Li-Fraumeni syndrome was linked to TP53 mutations. Since this discovery, many other genes associated with hereditary predisposition to leukemia have been identified. Although several of these disorders also predispose individuals to solid tumors, certain conditions exist in which individuals are specifically at increased risk to develop myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) and/or acute leukemia. The increasing identification of affected individuals and families has raised questions around the efficacy, timing, and optimal methods of surveillance. As part of the AACR Childhood Cancer Predisposition Workshop, an expert panel met to review the spectrum of leukemia-predisposing conditions, with the aim to develop consensus recommendations for surveillance for pediatric patients. The panel recognized that for several conditions, routine monitoring with complete blood counts and bone marrow evaluations is essential to identify disease evolution and enable early intervention with allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. However, for others, less intensive surveillance may be considered. Because few reports describing the efficacy of surveillance exist, the recommendations derived by this panel are based on opinion, and local experience and will need to be revised over time. The development of registries and clinical trials is urgently needed to enhance understanding of the natural history of the leukemia-predisposing conditions, such that these surveillance recommendations can be optimized to further enhance long-term outcomes. Clin Cancer Res; 23(11); e14–e22. ©2017 AACR. See all articles in the online-only CCR Pediatric Oncology Series.

Contains fulltext : 182555.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Closed access) Bromodomain PHD finger transcription factor (BPTF) is the largest subunit of nucleosome remodeling factor (NURF), a member of the ISWI chromatin-remodeling complex. However, the clinical consequences of disruption of this complex remain largely uncharacterized. BPTF is required for anterior-posterior axis formation of the mouse embryo and was shown to promote posterior neuroectodermal fate by enhancing Smad2-activated wnt8 expression in zebrafish. Here, we report eight loss-of-function and two missense variants (eight de novo and two of unknown origin) in BPTF on 17q24.2. The BPTF variants were found in unrelated individuals aged between 2.1 and 13 years, who manifest variable degrees of developmental delay/intellectual disability (10/10), speech delay (10/10), postnatal microcephaly (7/9), and dysmorphic features (9/10). Using CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing of bptf in zebrafish to induce a loss of gene function, we observed a significant reduction in head size of F0 mutants compared to control larvae. Terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase dUTP nick end labeling (TUNEL) and phospho-histone H3 (PH3) staining to assess apoptosis and cell proliferation, respectively, showed a significant increase in cell death in F0 mutants compared to controls. Additionally, we observed a substantial increase of the ceratohyal angle of the craniofacial skeleton in bptf F0 mutants, indicating abnormal craniofacial patterning. Taken together, our data demonstrate the pathogenic role of BPTF haploinsufficiency in syndromic neurodevelopmental anomalies and extend the clinical spectrum of human disorders caused by ablation of chromatin remodeling complexes.

BACKGROUND Li-Fraumeni syndrome is a rare genetic cancer predisposition syndrome caused by germline TP53 mutations. Up to 20% of mutation carriers develop cancer during childhood. The benefits of TP53 mutation testing of children are a matter of debate and knowledge of parent decision-making around such testing is limited. The current study examined how parents make decisions regarding TP53 testing for their children. METHODS Families offered and those pursuing TP53 testing for their children were identified across the study sites. Qualitative interviews with 46 parents (39 families) were analyzed to describe decision-making styles and perceived advantages and disadvantages of testing. RESULTS TP53 mutation testing uptake was high (92%). Three decision-making styles emerged. Automatic decisions (44% of decisions) involved little thought and identified immediate benefit(s) in testing (100% pursued testing). Considered decisions (49%) weighed the risks and benefits but were made easily (77% pursued testing). Deliberated decisions (6%) were difficult and focused on psychosocial concerns (25% pursued testing). Perceived advantages of testing included promoting child health, satisfying a “need to know,” understanding why cancer(s) occurred, suggesting family member risk, and benefiting research. Disadvantages included psychosocial risks and privacy/discrimination/insurance issues. CONCLUSIONS Although empirical evidence regarding the benefits and risks of TP53 testing during childhood are lacking, the majority of parents in the current study decided easily in favor of testing and perceived a range of advantages. The authors conclude that in the context of a clinical diagnosis of Li-Fraumeni syndrome, parents should continue to be offered TP53 testing for their children, counseled regarding potential risks and benefits, and supported in their decision-making process. Cancer 2015;121:286–93. © 2014 American Cancer Society.

Despite rapid technical progress and demonstrable effectiveness for some types of diagnosis and therapy, much remains to be learned about clinical genome and exome sequencing (CGES) and its role within the practice of medicine. The Clinical Sequencing Exploratory Research (CSER) consortium includes 18 extramural research projects, one National Human Genome Research Institute (NHGRI) intramural project, and a coordinating center funded by the NHGRI and National Cancer Institute. The consortium is exploring analytic and clinical validity and utility, as well as the ethical, legal, and social implications of sequencing via multidisciplinary approaches; it has thus far recruited 5,577 participants across a spectrum of symptomatic and healthy children and adults by utilizing both germline and cancer sequencing. The CSER consortium is analyzing data and creating publically available procedures and tools related to participant preferences and consent, variant classification, disclosure and management of primary and secondary findings, health outcomes, and integration with electronic health records. Future research directions will refine measures of clinical utility of CGES in both germline and somatic testing, evaluate the use of CGES for screening in healthy individuals, explore the penetrance of pathogenic variants through extensive phenotyping, reduce discordances in public databases of genes and variants, examine social and ethnic disparities in the provision of genomics services, explore regulatory issues, and estimate the value and downstream costs of sequencing. The CSER consortium has established a shared community of research sites by using diverse approaches to pursue the evidence-based development of best practices in genomic medicine.

Tumor mutations detected by genomic tests such as whole-exome sequencing (WES) have the potential to affect clinical management; however, data regarding clinical utility in pediatric neuro-oncology are limited. In order to investigate this topic, enrollment onto the BASIC3 clinical exome sequencing study was offered to children with newly-diagnosed CNS and non-CNS solid tumors. WES was performed on tumor (when available) and blood specimens in a certified clinical laboratory, with resulting genetic variants categorized by perceived clinical relevance and reported to the electronic health record. Mutations were also annotated following recent consensus guidelines (Li et al. J Mol Diagn 2017). WES was performed on 71 tumors obtained from 70 of 98 patients with CNS tumors on the BASIC3 study (71%), including embryonal tumors (medulloblastoma, n=18; PNET or pineoblastoma, n=5), LGG (n=9), HGG (n=7), and ependymal tumors (n=9). Analysis per the new guidelines revealed 21% (15/71) of tumors harbored a variant of “Strong Clinical Significance” (Tier 1) and 27% (19/71) a variant of “Potential Clinical Significance” (Tier 2). Targetable mutations involved the MAPK pathway (BRAF x 6, KRAS, FGFR1), PI3K/MTOR pathway (TSC1, PIK3CA), SWI/SNF family (SMARCB1, SMARCA4), and other protein kinases (PDGFRA x 2). The rate of clinically relevant mutations differed by histology, with frequent variants in LGG (4/9, 44%), HGG (6/7, 86%), and medulloblastoma (7/18, 39%), but not ependymal tumors (0/9, 0%). These data highlight the promise of clinical genomic testing for pediatric brain tumor patients as well as the need for integrated (DNA/RNA) genomic tumor testing to maximize diagnostic yield.

In recent years, high-throughput technologies such as microarrays have allowed comprehensive genetic profiling of a variety of diseases. Many types of tumors, including those of endocrine origin, have been subjected to microarray profiling. To the delight of most scientists, not only can the analysis of thousands of genes expressed in the tumors glean invaluable information regarding tumor biology, but one can also correlate the data with clinical parameters including diagnosis, prognosis, and drug response. In addition, some of these genes will likely serve as novel targets for future therapeutic intervention. We review here some of these technologies with a focus on their application to tumors of endocrine origin. We believe that these technologies, most of which are still evolving, will become mainstay research tools for biomedical research including the diagnosis and treatment of endocrine tumors. Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes 10:162–167 © 2003 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Background Effectively educating families about the risks and benefits of genomic tests such as whole exome sequencing (WES) offers numerous challenges, including the complexity of test results and potential loss of privacy. Research on best practices for obtaining informed consent (IC) in a variety of clinical settings is needed. The BASIC3 study of clinical tumor and germline WES in an ethnically diverse cohort of newly diagnosed pediatric cancer patients offers the opportunity to study the IC process in the setting of critical illness. We report on our experience for the first 100 families enrolled, including study participation rates, reasons for declining enrollment, assessment of clinical and demographic factors that might impact study enrollment, and preferences of parents for participation in optional genomics study procedures. Methods A specifically trained IC team offered study enrollment to parents of eligible children for procedures including clinical tumor and germline WES with results deposited in the medical record and disclosure of both diagnostic and incidental results to the family. Optional study procedures were also offered, such as receiving recessive carrier status and deposition of data into research databases. Stated reasons for declining participation were recorded. Clinical and demographic data were collected and comparisons made between enrolled and non-enrolled patients. Results Over 15 months, 100 of 121 (83%) eligible families elected to enroll in the study. No significant differences in enrollment were detected based on factors such as race, ethnicity, use of Spanish interpreters and Spanish consent forms, and tumor features (central nervous system versus non-central nervous system, availability of tumor for WES). The most common reason provided for declining enrollment (10% of families) was being overwhelmed by the new cancer diagnosis. Risks specific to clinical genomics, such as privacy concerns, were less commonly reported (5.5%). More than 85% of parents consented to each of the optional study procedures. Conclusions An IC process was developed that utilizes a specialized IC team, active communication with the oncology team, and an emphasis on scheduling flexibility. Most parents were willing to participate in a clinical germline and tumor WES study as well as optional procedures such as genomic data sharing independent of race, ethnicity or language spoken. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13073-014-0069-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Li-Fraumeni syndrome is a rare genetic cancer predisposition syndrome caused by germline TP53 mutations. Up to 20% of mutation carriers develop cancer during childhood. The benefits of TP53 mutation testing of children are a matter of debate and knowledge of parent decision-making around such testing is limited. The current study examined how parents make decisions regarding TP53 testing for their children.Families offered and those pursuing TP53 testing for their children were identified across the study sites. Qualitative interviews with 46 parents (39 families) were analyzed to describe decision-making styles and perceived advantages and disadvantages of testing.TP53 mutation testing uptake was high (92%). Three decision-making styles emerged. Automatic decisions (44% of decisions) involved little thought and identified immediate benefit(s) in testing (100% pursued testing). Considered decisions (49%) weighed the risks and benefits but were made easily (77% pursued testing). Deliberated decisions (6%) were difficult and focused on psychosocial concerns (25% pursued testing). Perceived advantages of testing included promoting child health, satisfying a "need to know," understanding why cancer(s) occurred, suggesting family member risk, and benefiting research. Disadvantages included psychosocial risks and privacy/discrimination/insurance issues.Although empirical evidence regarding the benefits and risks of TP53 testing during childhood are lacking, the majority of parents in the current study decided easily in favor of testing and perceived a range of advantages. The authors conclude that in the context of a clinical diagnosis of Li-Fraumeni syndrome, parents should continue to be offered TP53 testing for their children, counseled regarding potential risks and benefits, and supported in their decision-making process.

The integration of genome-scale studies such as whole-exome sequencing (WES) into the clinical care of children with cancer has the potential to provide insight into the genetic basis of an individual's cancer with implications for clinical management. This report describes the results of clinical tumor and germline WES for a patient with a rare tumor diagnosis, rosette-forming glioneuronal tumor of the fourth ventricle (RGNT). Three pathogenic gene alterations with implications for clinical care were identified: somatic activating hotspot mutations in FGFR1 (p.N546K) and PIK3CA (p.H1047R) and a germline pathogenic variant in PTPN11 (p.N308S) diagnostic for Noonan syndrome. The molecular landscape of RGNT is not well-described, but these data are consistent with prior observations regarding the importance of the interconnected MAPK and PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling pathways in this rare tumor. The co-occurrence of FGFR1, PIK3CA, and PTPN11 alterations provides further evidence for consideration of RGNT as a distinct molecular entity from pediatric low-grade gliomas and suggests potential therapeutic strategies for this patient in the event of tumor recurrence as novel agents targeting these pathways enter pediatric clinical trials. Although RGNT has not been definitively linked with cancer predisposition syndromes, two prior cases have been reported in patients with RASopathies (Noonan syndrome and neurofibromatosis type 1 [NF1]), providing an additional link between these tumors and the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling pathway. In summary, this case provides an example of the potential for genome-scale sequencing technologies to provide insight into the biology of rare tumors and yield both tumor and germline results of potential relevance to patient care.

Importance Whole-exome sequencing (WES) has the potential to reveal tumor and germline mutations of clinical relevance, but the diagnostic yield for pediatric patients with solid tumors is unknown. Objective To characterize the diagnostic yield of combined tumor and germline WES for children with solid tumors. Design Unselected children with newly diagnosed and previously untreated central nervous system (CNS) and non-CNS solid tumors were prospectively enrolled in the BASIC3 study at a large academic children’s hospital during a 23-month period from August 2012 through June 2014. Blood and tumor samples underwent WES in a certified clinical laboratory with genetic results categorized on the basis of perceived clinical relevance and entered in the electronic health record. Main Outcomes and Measures Clinical categorization of somatic mutations; frequencies of deleterious germline mutations related to patient phenotype and incidental medically-actionable mutations. Results Of the first 150 participants (80 boys and 70 girls, mean age, 7.4 years), tumor samples adequate for WES were available from 121 patients (81%). Somatic mutations of established clinical utility (category I) were reported in 4 (3%) of 121 patients, with mutations of potential utility (category II) detected in an additional 29 (24%) of 121 patients. CTNNB1 was the gene most frequently mutated, with recurrent mutations in KIT , TSC2 , and MAPK pathway genes ( BRAF , KRAS , and NRAS ) also identified. Mutations in consensus cancer genes (category III) were found in an additional 24 (20%) of 121 tumors. Fewer than half of somatic mutations identified were in genes known to be recurrently mutated in the tumor type tested. Diagnostic germline findings related to patient phenotype were discovered in 15 (10%) of 150 cases: 13 pathogenic or likely pathogenic dominant mutations in adult and pediatric cancer susceptibility genes (including 2 each in TP53 , VHL , and BRCA1 ), 1 recessive liver disorder with hepatocellular carcinoma ( TJP2 ), and 1 renal diagnosis ( CLCN5 ). Incidental findings were reported in 8 (5%) of 150 patients. Most patients harbored germline uncertain variants in cancer genes (98%), pharmacogenetic variants (89%), and recessive carrier mutations (85%). Conclusions and Relevance Tumor and germline WES revealed mutations in a broad spectrum of genes previously implicated in both adult and pediatric cancers. Combined reporting of tumor and germline WES identified diagnostic and/or potentially actionable findings in nearly 40% of newly diagnosed pediatric patients with solid tumors.

Background: The development of molecularly-targeted agents has made it possible to personalize therapy for patients by targeting the specific mutations in their tumor. Pediatric clinical trials utilizing such strategies are being planned but little is known about the opinions of pediatric oncologists regarding the utility of genomic data for guiding treatment decisions. The goals of this study were to (1) characterize those opinions in the context of children with relapsed/refractory solid tumors and (2) assess the potential impact of clinical whole exome sequencing (WES) data on medical decision-making in that context. Methods: As part of the ongoing BASIC3 clinical sequencing study at Texas Children's Cancer Center, clinical germline and tumor (if sample available) WES were performed for unselected newly-diagnosed pediatric CNS and non-CNS solid tumor patients. The primary oncologist for each (n=17) received online surveys for each study patient before and after review of WES reports. The pre- and post-WES surveys asked oncologists to rank options for off-study systemic chemotherapy (of any type) for their patient in the hypothetical scenario of tumor relapse. Oncologists were then asked if they would consider using a molecularly-targeted agent in the context of a clinical trial, and if so, which agents (from a representative list), their rank order and the rationale for those choices. Post-WES surveys also included questions regarding perceived utility of the tumor WES results for patient care. Pre-WES surveys were analyzed for baseline oncologist responses regarding these hypothetical treatment decisions. When available, pre- and post-WES surveys were analyzed as pairs as an initial assessment of the influence of the WES results on the oncologist's choice of therapy. Results: 177/189 (94%) of pre-WES surveys and 111/161 (69%) post-WES surveys were available for analysis. Analysis of pre-exome surveys revealed that oncologists would recommend systemic chemotherapy for 127/177 (72%) patients in the hypothetical event of tumor relapse but would consider a molecularly-targeted agent off-study as their first option in only 8/177 (4%) cases. In contrast, oncologists indicated that they would consider targeted therapies in the context of a clinical trial for 99/177 (56%) patients, most commonly sorafenib (n=21), cixutumumab (n=17), and crizotinib (n=13). There were 26 cases in which somatic mutations were identified in genes categorized as having established or potential clinical relevance, and for which both pre- and post-WES surveys were available. A corresponding targeted agent was ranked for consideration in the hypothetical scenario of relapse on the post-WES survey for 8/26 (31%) of these patients (somatic mutations in MET, JAK2, HRAS, NRAS X 2, ALK, BRAF, KIT), having only been chosen on the pre-WES survey in 2 of those cases. On 8 of 111 (7%) post-WES surveys, the oncologist removed a targeted agent that had been prioritized on the pre-WES survey after no relevant mutation was detected, including the Sonic Hedgehog inhibitor GDC-0449 in 5 cases. Conclusion: Although genomic tests such as WES have the potential to identify molecular targets for therapy in children with relapsed tumors, a survey of pediatric oncologists revealed that most consider such therapies as options only in the context of a clinical trial. These findings support the potential utility of WES in precision oncology approaches as well as the need for clinical trials evaluating the use of integrated genomic testing to guide treatment of children with relapsed solid tumors. Citation Format: Abhishek Bavle, Tao Wang, Frank Y. Lin, Angshumoy Roy, Robin A. Kerstein, Sarah Scollon, Katie Bergstrom, Stephanie Gutierrez, Uma Ramamurthy, Yaping Yang, Christine M. Eng, Richard A. Gibbs, Murali M. Chintagumpala, Susan G. Hilsenbeck, Sharon E. Plon, Stacey L. Berg, D. Williams Parsons. Impact of whole exome sequencing results on clinical decision making for pediatric solid tumor patients in the hypothetical scenario of tumor relapse: A survey of pediatric oncologists. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Precision Medicine Series: Integrating Clinical Genomics and Cancer Therapy; Jun 13-16, 2015; Salt Lake City, UT. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2016;22(1_Suppl):Abstract nr 04.

Genome-scale sequencing methods such as whole exome sequencing (WES) have provided significant insight into the pathogenesis of cancer. However, experience with the use of these tests in the clinical care of cancer patients remains limited. Sequencing of tumor and matched normal samples can reveal multiple types of results with implications for clinical practice. The identification of somatic (tumor-specific) mutations has the potential to offer diagnostic and prognostic information and inform selection of therapies. Detection of germline mutations in cancer susceptibility genes may prompt further genetic testing and guide cancer surveillance strategies for both the patient and family members. Germline mutations may also explain non-cancer phenotypes, predict drug responses, or provide reproductive counseling information for parents. The goal of the BASIC3 (Baylor College of Medicine Advancing Sequencing into Childhood Cancer Care) study is to determine the clinical impact of incorporating clinical tumor and constitutional WES into the care of children with newly diagnosed solid tumors. This study follows pediatric patients with newly diagnosed CNS and non-CNS solid tumors at Texas Children's Cancer Center for two years after performing CLIA-certified WES of blood and frozen tumor samples. Results are deposited into the electronic health record and disclosed to families by their oncologist and a genetic counselor. The potential impact of tumor exome findings on clinical decision-making is assessed through review of the medical record over the two year follow-up period as well as through surveys of the oncologists regarding prioritization of treatment options in the hypothetical event of tumor recurrence before and after receiving tumor exome results. Preferences of patient families and oncologists for reporting this complex information are obtained by interviews and audio recording of the WES result disclosure visits. Since the study opened in August 2012, more than 210 subjects have been enrolled (~80% of potentially eligible patients), representing the expected distribution of both CNS and non-CNS tumors. WES results have been reported for 170 subjects, revealing potentially-clinically relevant germline and somatic mutations in cancer genes known to be related to pediatric solid tumors as well as others known to be mutated primarily in adult cancer patients. Data will be presented regarding the diagnostic yield of combined tumor and germline WES for children with newly-diagnosed solid tumors. These results demonstrate the feasibility of routine tumor WES in the pediatric oncology clinic and a significant level of parental interest in receiving WES results and have significant implications for the treatment of children with relapsed and refractory solid tumors and the design of clinical trials using precision oncology approaches for these patients. Further analyses of the clinical utility of the WES data and the preferences of oncologists and parents for reporting of these results are under study. The BASIC3 study is a Clinical Sequencing Exploratory Research (CSER) program project supported by NHGRI/NCI 1U01HG006485. Citation Format: D. William Parsons, Angshumoy Roy, Yaping Yang, Tao Wang, Sarah Scollon, Katie Bergstrom, Robin A. Kerstein, Stephanie Gutierrez, Abhishek Bavle, Frank Y. Lin, Dolores H. López-Terrada, Federico A. Monzon, Jed G. Nuchtern, Uma Ramamurthy, Amy L. McGuire, Susan G. Hilsenbeck, Jeffrey G. Reid, Donna M. Muzny, David A. Wheeler, Stacey L. Berg, Murali M. Chintagumpala, Christine M. Eng, Richard A. Gibbs, Sharon E. Plon. Clinical genomics for children with solid tumors: Current realities and future opportunities. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Precision Medicine Series: Integrating Clinical Genomics and Cancer Therapy; Jun 13-16, 2015; Salt Lake City, UT. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2016;22(1_Suppl):Abstract nr IA16.

We report on clinical and molecular findings of a 15-year-old female referred to our genetics clinic for a diagnostic evaluation due to mild developmental delay, submucosal cleft palate, and seizure disorder. Chromosomal microarray technology revealed a cancer predisposition due to a terminal deletion on chromosome 19p that includes the tumor suppressor gene STK11. In addition to abnormal lip pigmentation on exam, further diagnostic workup with upper and lower gastrointestinal screening confirmed polyps consistent with Peutz-Jeghers syndrome. The purpose of this study is to present a full clinical description of a patient with a rare 19p13.3 chromosomal deletion and review the current literature of this newly emerging contiguous gene deletion syndrome. It also supports the screening for complications of Peutz-Jeghers syndrome in all patients with this deletion.

Advances in sequencing technologies allow for provision of genome-scale data to oncologists and geneticists caring for pediatric cancer patients but current experience with the clinical application of genomic sequencing is limited. The goal of the BASIC3 (Baylor Advancing Sequencing into Childhood Cancer Care) study is to determine the clinical impact of incorporating CLIA-certified tumor and constitutional whole exome sequencing (WES) into the care of children with newly diagnosed solid tumors. This study follows pediatric patients with newly diagnosed CNS and non-CNS solid tumors (target enrollment n=280) at Texas Children's Cancer Center for two years after performing CLIA-certified whole exome sequencing (WES) of blood and frozen tumor samples. Results are deposited into the electronic medical record and disclosed to families by their oncologist and a genetic counselor. The potential impact of tumor exome findings on clinical decision-making is assessed through review of the medical record over the two year follow-up period as well as through surveys of the oncologists regarding prioritization of treatment options in the hypothetical event of tumor recurrence before and after receiving tumor exome results. Preferences of patient families and oncologists for reporting this complex information are obtained by interviews and audiorecording of the exome result disclosure visits. Since the study opened in August 2012, ∼85% of potentially eligible families have consented to enrollment. The first 100 patients comprise a diverse representation of diagnoses, including 32 with CNS tumors (32%) and 68 with non-CNS tumors (68%). Despite limited diagnostic biopsies in many patents, snap-frozen tumor samples adequate for WES were obtained from 84 subjects (84%), including 62/68 non-CNS solid tumors (91%) and 22/32 (69%) CNS solid tumors. Tumor WES results have been reported for the first 55 patients, revealing a median of 9 (range of 0 to 78) protein-altering mutations per tumor and alterations of known cancer genes such as ALK, BRAF, DICER1, KIT, KRAS, NRAS, MET, JAK2, FGFR3, ARID1A, CTNNB1, and TP53. Fourteen of 55 tumors (25%) contained mutations classified as having proven or potential clinical utility. These results demonstrate the feasibility of routine tumor WES in the pediatric oncology clinic and a significant level of parental interest in receiving WES results. Potentially clinically-relevant mutations can be identified in a substantial minority of pediatric solid tumor patients but distinct from the medically actionable mutations seen in adult cancer patients. Data further assessing the clinical utility of the tumor exomes and the preferences of oncologists and parents for reporting of these results are under study. Supported by NHGRI/NCI 1U01HG006485. Citation Format: D. Williams Parsons, Angshumoy Roy, Federico A. Monzon, Dolores H. López-Terrada, Murali M. Chintagumpala, Stacey L. Berg, Susan G. Hilsenbeck, Tao Wang, Robin A. Kerstein, Sarah Scollon, Katie Bergstrom, Richard L. Street, Jr., Laurence B. McCullough, Amy L. McGuire, Uma Ramamurthy, David A. Wheeler, Christine M. Eng, Yaping Yang, Jeff G. Reid, Donna M. Muzny, Richard A. Gibbs, Sharon E. Plon. Evaluating the implementation and utility of clinical tumor exome sequencing in the pediatric oncology clinic: Early results of the BASIC3 study. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference on Pediatric Cancer at the Crossroads: Translating Discovery into Improved Outcomes; Nov 3-6, 2013; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2013;74(20 Suppl):Abstract nr IA16.

Background: Advances in sequencing technologies allow for provision of genome-scale data to physicians caring for pediatric cancer patients but current experience with the clinical application of genomic sequencing is limited and the diagnostic yield of these methods is unclear. Methods: The goal of the BASIC3 (Baylor Advancing Sequencing into Childhood Cancer Care) study is to determine the clinical impact of incorporating tumor and constitutional whole exome sequencing (WES) into the care of children with newly diagnosed solid tumors at Texas Children's Cancer Center (target enrollment n=280). WES of patient blood and frozen tumor samples is being conducted in the CLIA-certified Whole Genome Laboratory at Baylor College of Medicine using the VCRome 2.1 capture reagent and Illumina paired-end sequencing with reports incorporated in the medical record. Results: 120 patients have enrolled to date, including 39 (33%) and 81 (67%) with CNS and non-CNS tumors, respectively. Despite limited diagnostic biopsies in many patients, tumor samples adequate for WES have been obtained from 97 subjects (81%). WES results have been reported for 89 patients. Tumor WES (n=73) revealed 20 of 73 tumors (27%) to contain mutations classified as having proven or potential clinical utility, including recurrent alterations of CTNNB1, BRAF, KIT, and NRAS/KRAS. Notably, less than 50% of somatic mutations would have been detected on an adult-focused cancer panel, BCM Cancer Gene Mutation Panel v.2. Germline WES (n=89) identified diagnostic findings in 11 cases (12%) including 8 patients with pathogenic mutations in dominant cancer susceptibility genes (singletons except for 2 patients with TP53 mutations). Four of these 8 patients had genetic testing recommended clinically. There were 2 patients with mutations providing the genetic cause of non-cancer medical problems and 1 patient with a mutation which explained both liver disease and hepatocellular carcinoma. Downstream testing of at-risk relatives has occurred rapidly in several families and cancer screening recommendations implemented. Seven (8%) medically actionable incidental findings unrelated to phenotype were reported, predominantly in cardiovascular genes and mitochondrial DNA. Conclusions: These data demonstrate the feasibility of routine WES in the pediatric oncology setting. Early results demonstrate that clinically relevant findings are identified by tumor and germline WES in 38% of pediatric solid tumor patients. The yield of clinically relevant somatic and germline alterations would likely increase further by incorporation of complementary genomic methods (e.g. RNA-seq or copy number analysis). Assessment of the clinical utility of the tumor and germline exomes and preferences for reporting of these results to physicians and parents are under study. Supported by NHGRI/NCI 1U01HG006485. Citation Format: Donald W. Parsons, Angshumoy Roy, Federico A. Monzon, Yaping Yang, Dolores H. López-Terrada, Murali M. Chintagumpala, Stacey L. Berg, Susan G. Hilsenbeck, Tao Wang, Robin A. Kerstein, Sarah Scollon, Katie Bergstrom, Richard L. Street, Laurence B. McCullough, Amy L. McGuire, Uma Ramamurthy, Jeff G. Reid, Donna M. Muzny, David A. Wheeler, Christine M. Eng, Richard A. Gibbs, Sharon E. Plon. Diagnostic yield of clinical tumor and germline exome sequencing for newly diagnosed children with solid tumors. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 105th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2014 Apr 5-9; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2014;74(19 Suppl):Abstract nr 5169. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2014-5169

BACKGROUND: Additional insight into the molecular alterations driving pediatric central nervous system (CNS) tumors is urgently needed, given the significant morbidity and mortality associated with these cancers and the relative paucity of effective chemotherapeutic options. Advances in sequencing technologies now allow for provision of genome-scale data to oncologists caring for pediatric cancer patients but current experience with the clinical application of genomic sequencing is limited. The goal of the BASIC3 (Baylor Advancing Sequencing into Childhood Cancer Care) study is to determine the clinical impact of incorporating CLIA-certified tumor and constitutional whole exome sequencing (WES) into the care of children with newly diagnosed solid tumors. METHODS: The study follows pediatric patients with newly diagnosed CNS and non-CNS solid tumors (target enrollment n = 280) at Texas Children's Cancer Center for two years after performing CLIA-certified whole exome sequencing (WES) of blood and frozen tumor samples. Results are deposited into the electronic medical record and disclosed to families by their oncologist and a genetic counselor. The potential impact of tumor exome findings on clinical decision-making is assessed through review of the medical record and through surveys of the oncologists regarding prioritization of treatment options in the hypothetical event of tumor recurrence. RESULTS: To date, 133 subjects have been enrolled, including 47 patients with CNS tumors (35%) comprising a diverse representation of diagnoses. Despite limited diagnostic biopsies in many patients, tumor samples adequate for WES were obtained from 33/47 (70%) patients. Tumor WES results have been reported for the first 22 CNS tumors, revealing a median of 7 (range of 0 to 25) protein-altering mutations per tumor, including alterations of known cancer genes such as ARID1A, SMARCA4, BRAF, CTNNB1, DDX3X, NF2, FANCA, and NOTCH3. Notably, 12/22 (55%) tumors were found to harbour mutations only in genes not known to be recurrently altered in human cancers. CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate the feasibility of routine tumor WES in the pediatric neuro- oncology clinic. Potentially clinically-relevant mutations can be identified in a substantial proportion of patients but early results suggest that integration of parallel genomic technologies (e.g. RNAseq) to identify genetic alterations not detectable by WES will be necessary; such studies are ongoing. Orthotopic xenograft models and cell lines are being established to allow in vitro and in vivo analysis of tumors containing alterations of interest. Data further assessing the clinical utility of the tumor exomes are under study. Supported by NHGRI/NCI 1U01HG006485. SECONDARY CATEGORY: Neuropathology & Tumor Biomarkers.

10012 Background: Whole exome sequencing (WES) can identify a wide spectrum of tumor and germline genetic findings. Before WES is incorporated into oncology practice, it is necessary to gain an und...

10023 Background: Advances in sequencing technologies allow for provision of genome-scale data to oncologists and geneticists caring for pediatric cancer patients. The goal of the BASIC3 (Baylor Advancing Sequencing into Childhood Cancer Care) study is to determine the clinical impact of incorporating CLIA-certified tumor and constitutional exome sequencing into the care of children with newly diagnosed solid tumors. Methods: Blood and frozen tumor samples obtained at initial surgery are submitted for clinical exome sequencing (target enrollment 280 patients). Results are deposited into the electronic medical record and disclosed to families by their oncologist and a genetic counselor. Identification of germline cancer susceptibility mutations is compared with standard testing practices. Oncologists are surveyed on prioritization of treatment options in the hypothetical event of tumor recurrence before and after receiving tumor exome results. Patients will be followed for two years to assess the clinical utility of exome data. Preferences for reporting this complex information are obtained by interviews and audiorecording of disclosure visits. Results: Initial results reveal that41 of 49 (84%) ethnically diverse families have consented to enroll on study. Adequate tumor samples were available from 35 of 41 patients (85%), including 11 of 15 (73%) patients with CNS tumors and 24 of 26 (92%) with non-CNS tumors. Pathogenic germline cancer susceptibility mutations (TP53, MSH2) were reported in 2 of the first 11 patients, with a medically-actionable mutation in a gene (SCN5A) unrelated to cancer in 1 patient and 0-4 (median of 2) recessive carrier mutations per patient. Between 9 and 33 protein altering mutations (median of 11) have been identified in tumors, including known cancer genes such as TP53 and others with no known link to pediatric cancer. Conclusions: A robust clinical pipeline for exome sequencing of blood and tumor samples has been successfully developed with significant parental interest. Data assessing the clinical utility of both the tumor and constitutional exomes and the preferences of oncologists and parents for reporting of these results are under study. Supported by NHGRI 1U01HG006485.