Search

Current systemic therapy guidelines for patients with HER2 + breast cancer brain metastases (BCBrM) diverge based on the status of extracranial disease (ECD). An in-depth understanding of the impact of ECD on outcomes in HER2 + BCBrM has never been performed. Our study explores the implications of ECD status on intracranial progression-free survival (iPFS) and overall survival (OS) after first incidence of HER2 + BCBrM and radiation.A retrospective analysis was performed of 151 patients diagnosed with initial HER2 + BCBrM who received radiation therapy to the central nervous system (CNS) at Duke between 2008 and 2021. The primary endpoint was iPFS defined as the time from first CNS radiation treatment to intracranial progression or death. OS was defined as the time from first CNS radiation or first metastatic disease to death. Systemic staging scans within 30 days of initial BCBrM defined ECD status as progressive, stable/responding or none (isolated brain relapse).In this cohort, 70% of patients had controlled ECD with either isolated brain relapse (27%) or stable/responding ECD (44%). OS from initial metastatic disease to death was markedly worse for patients with isolated intracranial relapse (median = 28.4 m) compared to those with progressive or stable/responding ECD (48.8 m and 71.5 m, respectively, p = 0.0028). OS from first CNS radiation to death was significantly worse for patients with progressive ECD (16.9 m) versus stable/responding (36.6 m) or isolated intracranial relapse (28.4 m, p = 0.007). iPFS did not differ statistically based on ECD status. Receipt of systemic therapy after first BCBrM significantly improved iPFS (HR 0.45, 95% CI: 0.25-0.81, p = 0.008) and OS (HR: 0.43 (95% CI: 0.23-0.81); p = 0.001).OS in patients with HER2 + isolated BCBrM was inferior to those with concurrent progressive or stable/responding ECD. Studies investigating initiation of brain-penetrable HER2-targeted therapies earlier in the disease course of isolated HER2 + intracranial relapse patients are warranted.

Purpose: Brain metastases can occur in up to 50% of patients with metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer. Because patients with active brain metastases were excluded from previous pivotal clinical trials, the central nervous system (CNS) activity of the antibody–drug conjugate trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) is not well characterized. Experimental Design: We studied how T-DXd affects growth and overall survival in orthotopic patient-derived xenografts (PDX) of HER2-positive and HER2-low breast cancer brain metastases (BCBM). Separately, we evaluated the effects of T-DXd in a retrospective cohort study of 17 patients with stable or active brain metastases. Results: T-DXd inhibited tumor growth and prolonged survival in orthotopic PDX models of HER2-positive (IHC 3+) and HER2-low (IHC 2+/FISH ratio < 2) BCBMs. T-DXd reduced tumor size and prolonged survival in a T-DM1–resistant HER2-positive BCBM PDX model. In a retrospective multi-institutional cohort study of 17 patients with predominantly HER2-positive BCBMs, the CNS objective response rate (ORR) was 73% (11/15) while extracranial response rate was 45% (5/11). In the subset of patients with untreated or progressive BCBM at baseline, the CNS ORR was 70% (7/10). The median time on treatment with T-DXd was 8.9 (1.3–16.2) months, with 42% (7/17) remaining on treatment at data cutoff. Conclusions: T-DXd demonstrates evidence of CNS activity in HER2-positive and HER2-low PDX models of BCBM and preliminary evidence of clinical efficacy in a multi-institution case series of patients with BCBM. Prospective clinical trials to further evaluate CNS activity of T-DXd in patients with active brain metastases are warranted. See related commentary by Soffietti and Pellerino, p. 8

The estrogen receptor (ER/ESR1) is expressed in a majority of breast cancers and drugs that inhibit ER signaling are the cornerstone of breast cancer pharmacotherapy. Currently, aromatase inhibitors are the frontline endocrine interventions of choice although their durability in metastatic disease is limited by activating point mutations within the ligand-binding domain of ESR1 that permit ligand-independent activation of the receptor. It has been suggested that the most commonly occurring ESR1 mutations would likely compromise the clinical activity of selective estrogen receptor downregulators and selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) when used as second-line therapies. It was unclear, however, how these mutations, which are likely coexpressed in cells with ERWT, may impact response to ER ligands in a clinically meaningful manner. To address this issue, we dissected the molecular mechanism(s) underlying ESR1-mutant pharmacology in models relevant to metastatic disease. These studies revealed that the response of ESR1 mutations to ligands was dictated primarily by the relative coexpression of ERWT in cells. Specifically, dysregulated pharmacology was only evident in cells in which the mutants were overexpressed relative to ligand-activated ERWT; a finding that highlights the role of allelism in determining ER-mutant pharmacology. Importantly, we demonstrated that the antagonist activity of the SERM, lasofoxifene, was not impacted by mutant status; a finding that has led to its clinical evaluation as a treatment for patients with advanced ER-positive breast cancer whose tumors harbor ESR1 mutations.

Supplemental Figure 1: Structures of clinically relevant compounds used in this study. Supplemental Figure 2: Cells expressing both the ERWT and ERmuts have similar pharmacological responses to antiestrogens when compared to cells only expressing ERWT. Supplemental Figure 3: Albeit differences in clonal variability, there is indistinguishable differences in T47D proliferation in response to antiestrogens. Supplemental Figure 4: Downregulation of ER in MCF7B cells is unaffected by the presence of the mutant receptor. Supplemental Figure 5: Validation of ER mutation status in engineered cell lines. Supplemental Figure 6: Protein levels of transfected constructs in SKBR3 cells are consistent with MCF7 expression level. Supplemental Figure 7: ER expression in MCF7I cells is titratable with doxycycline treatment. Supplemental Figure 8: Overexpression of ERY537S or ERD538G, not ERWT, in MCF7I cells changes ligand potency. Supplemental Figure 9: Western blot validation of relative ER expression levels in SKBR3. Supplemental Figure 10: Agonist activation of relative expression levels of ERWT and ERmuts in SKBR3 cells. Supplemental Figure 11: In-Cell Western validation of ER expression levels for siRNA knockdown and cDNA overexpression in MCF7i. Supplemental Figure 12: Agonist activation of relative expression levels of ERWT and ERmuts in MCF7i cells. Supplemental Figure 13: The altered potency of fulvestrant against the ERmuts on endogenous ER target genes is only evident when expressed at a level higher than the WT receptor.

Purpose:Brain metastases can occur in up to 50% of patients with metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer. Because patients with active brain metastases were excluded from previous pivotal clinical trials, the central nervous system (CNS) activity of the antibody–drug conjugate trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) is not well characterized.Experimental Design:We studied how T-DXd affects growth and overall survival in orthotopic patient-derived xenografts (PDX) of HER2-positive and HER2-low breast cancer brain metastases (BCBM). Separately, we evaluated the effects of T-DXd in a retrospective cohort study of 17 patients with stable or active brain metastases.Results:T-DXd inhibited tumor growth and prolonged survival in orthotopic PDX models of HER2-positive (IHC 3+) and HER2-low (IHC 2+/FISH ratio < 2) BCBMs. T-DXd reduced tumor size and prolonged survival in a T-DM1–resistant HER2-positive BCBM PDX model. In a retrospective multi-institutional cohort study of 17 patients with predominantly HER2-positive BCBMs, the CNS objective response rate (ORR) was 73% (11/15) while extracranial response rate was 45% (5/11). In the subset of patients with untreated or progressive BCBM at baseline, the CNS ORR was 70% (7/10). The median time on treatment with T-DXd was 8.9 (1.3–16.2) months, with 42% (7/17) remaining on treatment at data cutoff.Conclusions:T-DXd demonstrates evidence of CNS activity in HER2-positive and HER2-low PDX models of BCBM and preliminary evidence of clinical efficacy in a multi-institution case series of patients with BCBM. Prospective clinical trials to further evaluate CNS activity of T-DXd in patients with active brain metastases are warranted.See related commentary by Soffietti and Pellerino, p. 8

Figures S1 and S2

Background: Data supporting high tumor mutational burden (TMB-H) as a lone biomarker for an immune responsive tumor microenvironment (TME) or of response to immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) is weak; yet the tumor agnostic approval in TMB-H advanced tumors makes ICI an option in the clinic. PDL-1 positivity (PDL-1+) is the only consistent biomarker for ICI benefit in metastatic triple-negative BC (mTNBC). We sought to further evaluate concurrent predictors of an immune responsive or non-responsive TME within TMB-H MBC. Methods: Tumor samples (N=5621) obtained from patients with MBC were analyzed by next-generation sequencing (NGS) of DNA (592-gene panel or whole exome sequencing) and RNA (whole transcriptome sequencing) at Caris Life Sciences (Phoenix, AZ). Friends of Cancer Research TMB Harmonization Project (Merino et al., 2020) recommendations, with the TMB-H threshold set to ≥ 10 muts/Mb, were used. PDL-1+ (≥1% immune cells stained) assessed by IHC (Ventana SP142). Deficient-mismatch repair (dMMR) and high microsatellite instability (MSI-H) were determined by IHC and NGS, respectively. Gene expression profiling assessed 21 immune-related signatures and TMEs using MCP-counter (Betch et al., 2016) and quanTIseq (Finotello et al., 2019). Immune cell types were classified as immune-responsive (CD8+ and CD4+ T cells, B cells, myeloid dendritic cells, M1 macrophages, NK cells, and neutrophils) or non-responsive (Tregs, M2 macrophages, and monocytes). P-values adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg procedure. Exploratory p-values reported for sub-analyses of TMB-H responsive vs nonresponsive TME and PDL1+ vs PDL1- subgroups. Results: TMB-H was identified in 461/5621 (8.2%) MBC samples. TMB-H tumors exhibit significant enrichment of dMMR/MSI-H (7 vs 0%, p Citation Format: Sarah Sammons, Andrew Elliott, Jeremy Force, Saranya Chumsri, Carey Anders, Antoinette R Tan, Daniel Magee, Jia Zeng, W. Michael Korn, Mustafa Kahsraw, Evanthia T Roussos Torres. Concurrent predictors of an immune responsive tumor microenvironment within tumor mutational burden-high breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-08-08.

Background: During the COVID pandemic, we designed and implemented a program, called BQual-D, to maintain high quality care for patients with HR+, HER2 negative MBC who were taking oral anti-cancer therapy and needed to shelter at home. This program augmented available clinical resources with (1) trained nurse coaches to manage side effects, improve adherence, monitor for cancer progression and screen for psychological distress via telehealth, and (2) a care coordinator to arrange blood testing at local labs to facilitate timely medication dose adjustments. BQual-D served patients from August, 2020 through April of 2021. Here, we describe survey results assessing provider satisfaction with BQual-D. Methods: Surveys assessing provider satisfaction were distributed in December, 2020 (Survey#1) and in April, 2021 (Survey#2). Provider demographics were collected with Survey#1. Eight questions assessed satisfaction with different aspects of the BQual-D program, including content of the nurse coach notes, communication with the program, timeliness of communication, frequency of notes, ease of reading the notes, ease of referring patients, and turnaround time for labs, which were rated on a Likert scale of 1 (strongly dissatisfied) to 10 (strongly satisfied), with an additional response choice of 0 (unable to assess). Providers were also asked if BQual-D led to changes in patient management (yes/no), the degree to which BQual-D supported the medical management of the patient (from 1=not at all to 7=significantly), the influence of BQual-D on patient wellbeing (positive effects, no change, negative effects), and the overall quality of care delivered by the program (from 1=excellent to 4=poor). Finally, we asked providers if they would continue to recommend their patients to BQual-D (yes, in the same way as the program has been deployed; yes but with improvements; or no). Results are described by frequencies and means. Results: Nineteen providers responded to Survey#1. Providers were physicians (31.6%), advanced practice providers (31.6%), nurses (31.6%) and a clinical pharmacist (5.3%). Respondents were 89.5% female, 94.7% White, and had a mean age of 44 years and mean 11 years in practice. Providers rated the quality of care provided by the BQual-D program as excellent (44%) or good (57%), all providers surveyed indicated that they would continue to recommend the program to patients, and 95% of providers indicated that the program had a positive effect on patients’ well-being. Half of the respondents indicated that BQual-D resulted in changes in or addition to patient management and 90% indicated that BQual-D significantly supported medical management. Providers were strongly satisfied (scores of 8-10 on the Likert scale) with overall communication with the BQual-D team (74%) and timeliness of communications (79%). Providers were also strongly satisfied with the content (68.4%), frequency (74%), and ease of reading (68%) program notes. Seven providers completed Survey#2, in which providers rated the overall quality of the program as excellent (57%) or good (43%); 86% indicated that they would continue to recommend the program to patients, and 86% indicated that the program had a positive effect on patients’ well-being. Conclusions: During the COVID pandemic, when sheltering at home was encouraged, provider satisfaction with BQual-D, which provided additional health resources (nurse coaches, care coordinator) to support patients on oral therapy for HR+ MBC, was high. Resources needed to implement BQual-D should be explored as a way of providing additional support for patients and providers in order to minimize the requirement for in-person visits. Funding: Supported by a grant from Pfizer. Citation Format: Gretchen Kimmick, Smrithi Davakaran, Heather Moore, Cynthia Rose, Pamela Gentry, Michael Willis, Susan Dent, Sarah Sammons, Jeremy Force, Kelly Westbrook, Carey Anders, Rebecca Shelby. Best quality care from a distance (BQual-D): Maintaining high quality care for hormone receptor positive (HR+) metastatic breast cancer (MBC) during the COVID pandemic, description of the program and provider satisfaction [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-10-06.

Background: APOBEC mutagenesis underlies somatic evolution and accounts for tumor heterogeneity in several cancers, including BC. In our clinical experience, HR+HER2- BC with an APOBEC signature do poorly on standard of care (SOC) first line endocrine therapy (ET) + CDK4/6 inhibitor (CDK4/6i) and need additional treatment options. Here we evaluated the characteristics of a real-world cohort for time-to-treatment discontinuation (TTD) and overall survival (OS) on SOC and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI).Methods: Hybrid capture-based comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) results from 29,833 formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue biopsies of all BC subtypes were analyzed. For outcomes (TTD and OS), this study used a de-identified nationwide (US-based) BC clinico-genomic database (CGDB, ~800 sites of care, 1/2011 - 12/2020). HR+HER2- metastatic BC pts who received first line ET + CDK4/6i were included (CGDB cohort).TTD was defined as the difference between the first and last drug episode within a given line of treatment (LOT). LOT were derived based on FH algorithms. OS was defined as the time from LOT start to the date of death or data cutoff. Log-rank test and Cox model were used to evaluate the difference in outcomes. To reduce the impact of confounding variables (Age at Dx, Stage at Dx, Tumor Type, Metastases sites, TMB group (≥10 vs 6 mo. In Mayo and Duke cohort, there were 6 pts, 5/6 received ICI + chemotherapy. The TTD was 0.9-40.5 months with longest 2 pts receiving 5-FU plus ICI (11 and 40.5 months). To better understand the ICI treatment landscape, TTD in HR+HER2- hTMB MSS APOBEC- CGDB cohort (N=6) was analyzed: 5/6 had evaluable treatment data, 4/5 finished ICI treatment, 1 pt’s TTD was > 3 mo, 0/5 had TTD > 6 mo. Conclusions: APOBEC+ occurs in ~7% of BC and is more common in ILC and metastatic lesions. APOBEC+ HR+HER2- pts had shorter TTD and OS on SOC ET+CDK4/6i relative to APOBEC- pts. However, TTD on ICI tended to be longer in APOBEC+ pts, but our data is limited, and more research is needed. CGDB APOBEC+ vs. APOBEC- with SOC 1st lineAPOBEC+ (N=69)APOBEC- (N=788)p adjusted (FDR)*Age at Dx, Median (IQR)59.0 (53.0, 65.0)56.0 (47.0, 65.0)0.102Stage at Dx0.067- 0-III52 (75.4%)505 (64.1%)- IV11 (15.9%)245 (31.1%)- Not documented6 (8.7%)38 (4.8%)Metastasis free interval, yrs, Median (IQR)5.2 (3.0, 10.5)5.1 (2.8, 9.3)0.734Tumor Grade0.104- Grade 12 (2.9%)49 (6.2%)- Grade 234 (49.3%)259 (32.9%)- Grade 311 (15.9%)163 (20.7%)- Not documented22 (31.9%)317 (40.2%)Tumor Type0*- IDC7 (10.1%)251 (31.9%)- ILC30 (43.5%)138 (17.5%)- Other /Not documented32 (46.4%)399 (50.6%)Metastases sites0.734- Bone-only17 (24.6%)169 (21.5%)- CNS11 (15.9%)104 (13.2%)- Visceral41 (59.4%)514 (65.3%)TMB, Median (IQR)11.3 (8.8, 18.8)2.5 (1.3, 3.8)0*MSI0.946- MSI-H0 (0.0%)4 (0.5%)- MSI-I0 (0.0%)1 (0.1%)- MSS68 (98.6%)728 (97.2%)- Not documented1 (1.4%)16 (2.1%)BRCA5 (7.2%)45 (5.7%)0.734PIK3CA46 (66.7%)341 (43.3%)0.001*Treatments0.005*- AI + CDK4/6i31 (44.9%)510 (64.7%)- Fulvestrant + CDK4/6i38 (55.1%)278 (35.3%) Citation Format: Saranya Chumsri, Kira Raskina, Sarah Sammons, Laura Alder, Natalie Danziger, Alexa B Schrock, Kim McGregor, Ethan Sokol. APOBEC signature, clinical characteristics, and outcome in hormone receptor-positive (HR+) HER2-negative (HER2-) breast cancer (BC) patients (pts) in real-world data (RWD) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD14-09.

BACKGROUND: We sought to identify characteristics of metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients who may benefit most from primary tumor resection. METHODS: Recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) was used to categorize non-surgical patients with de novo MBC in the NCDB (2010–2015) into 3 groups (I/II/III) based on 3-year overall survival (OS). After bootstrapping (BS), group-level profiles were applied, and the association of surgery with OS was estimated using Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS: All patients benefitted from surgery (median OS, surgery vs no surgery): 72.7 vs 42.9 months, 47.3 vs 30.4 months, 23.8 vs 14.4 months (all p

The development of breast cancer (BC) brain metastases (BrM) is a common complication of advanced disease, occurring in up to half of the patients with advanced disease depending on the subtype. The management of BCBrM requires complex multidisciplinary care including local therapy, surgical resection and/or radiotherapy, palliative care, and carefully selected systemic therapies. Significant progress has been made in the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive (HER2+) BCBrM population due to novel brain penetrable systemic therapies. Increased inclusion of patients with BCBrM in clinical trials using brain-penetrant systemic therapies recently led to the first FDA approval of a HER2-directed therapy specifically in the BCBrM population in the last year. Advances for the treatment of HR+/HER2− and TNBC BCBrM subgroups continue to evolve. In this review, we will discuss the diagnosis and multidisciplinary care of BCBrM. We focus on recent advances in neurosurgery, radiation therapy, and systemic treatment therapies with intracranial activity. We also provide an overview of the current clinical trial landscape for patients with BCBrM.

PURPOSE APOBEC mutagenesis underlies somatic evolution and accounts for tumor heterogeneity in several cancers, including breast cancer (BC). In this study, we evaluated the characteristics of a real-world cohort for time-to-treatment discontinuation (TTD) and overall survival on CDK4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) plus endocrine therapy (ET) and immune checkpoint inhibitors. METHODS Comprehensive genomic profiling results from 29,833 BC samples were analyzed for tumor mutational burden and APOBEC signatures. For clinical outcomes, a deidentified nationwide (United States–based) BC Clinico-Genomic Database (CGDB) was evaluated with log-rank and Cox models. Patients with hormone receptor–positive (HR+) human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–negative (HER2–) BC who received first-line ET and CDK4/6i were included. Eligible patients from Mayo Clinic and Duke University were HR+ HER2– BC with sequencing data between September 2013 and July 2020. RESULTS Of 29,833 samples sequenced, 7.9% were APOBEC+ with a high rate in invasive lobular carcinoma (16.7%) and in metastatic tumors (9.7%) relative to locally biopsied BC (4.3%; P < .001). In CGDB, 857 patients with HR+ HER2– BC received ET plus CDK4/6i in the first line. APOBEC+ patients had significantly shorter TTD on ET plus CDK4/6i than APOBEC– patients, 7.8 (95% CI, 4.3 to 14.6) versus 12.4 months (95% CI, 11.2 to 14.1; hazard ratio, 1.6; 95% CI, 1.03 to 2.39; P = .0036). Clinical benefit to immune checkpoint inhibitors was observed in HR+ HER2–, APOBEC+, tumor mutational burden–high patients, with four of nine CGDB patients (TTD 0.3-11.3 months) and four of six patients in Duke/Mayo cohorts (TTD 0.9-40.5 months) with a TTD of ≥ 3 months. CONCLUSION APOBEC+ HR+ HER2– patients had shorter TTD on first-line ET plus CDK4/6i relative to APOBEC– patients. Further research is needed to optimize the treatment of APOBEC+ HR+ HER2– BC and to investigate the efficacy of immunotherapeutic strategies in this population.

Objective/Background We performed a retrospective analysis of longitudinal real-world data (RWD) from patients with breast cancer to replicate results from clinical studies and demonstrate the feasibility of generating real-world evidence. We also assessed the value of transcriptome profiling as a complementary tool for determining molecular subtypes. Methods De-identified, longitudinal data were analyzed after abstraction from records of patients with breast cancer in the United States (US) structured and stored in the Tempus database. Demographics, clinical characteristics, molecular subtype, treatment history, and survival outcomes were assessed according to strict qualitative criteria. RNA sequencing and clinical data were used to predict molecular subtypes and signaling pathway enrichment. Results The clinical abstraction cohort (n = 4000) mirrored the demographics and clinical characteristics of patients with breast cancer in the US, indicating feasibility for RWE generation. Among patients who were human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive (HER2+), 74.2% received anti-HER2 therapy, with ∼70% starting within 3 months of a positive test result. Most non-treated patients were early stage. In this RWD set, 31.7% of patients with HER2+ immunohistochemistry (IHC) had discordant fluorescence in situ hybridization results recorded. Among patients with multiple HER2 IHC results at diagnosis, 18.6% exhibited intra-test discordance. Through development of a whole-transcriptome model to predict IHC receptor status in the molecular sequenced cohort (n = 400), molecular subtypes were resolved for all patients (n = 36) with equivocal HER2 statuses from abstracted test results. Receptor-related signaling pathways were differentially enriched between clinical molecular subtypes. Conclusions RWD in the Tempus database mirrors the overall population of patients with breast cancer in the US. These results suggest that real-time, RWD analyses are feasible in a large, highly heterogeneous database. Furthermore, molecular data may aid deficiencies and discrepancies observed from breast cancer RWD.

BACKGROUND. Although metastatic breast cancer (MBC) remains incurable, advances in therapies have improved survival. Using a contemporary dataset of de novo MBC patients, we explore how overall (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) changed over time. METHODS. All patients with de novo MBC from 1988 to 2016 were selected from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) 18. Unadjusted OS and CSS were estimated by Kaplan–Meier method and stratified by disease characteristics. Cox proportional hazards models determined factors associated with survival. RESULTS. 47,034 patients were included, with median OS of 25 months and CSS of 27 months. Survival steadily improved over time (1988: 1-year OS 62%, CSS 65%; 2015: 1-year OS 72%, CSS 74%). Patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) had the worst prognosis and were most likely to die from MBC [versus human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)+ and hormone receptor (HR)+/HER2−]. Those with ≥ 4 sites of metastatic disease were also more likely to die from MBC with nearly identical OS and CSS (5-year OS 9%, CSS 9%), when compared with those with 1 site (5-year OS 31%, CSS 35%). After adjustment, improved CSS was associated with bone-only disease [hazard ratio (HR) 0.88, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.83–0.94], while TNBC (versus HER2+: HR 3.12, 95% CI 2.89–3.36) and > 3 sites of metastatic disease (versus 1 site: HR 3.24, 95% CI 2.68–3.91) were associated with worse CSS (all p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS. Accurate prognostic estimates are essential for patient care. As treatments for patients with MBC have expanded, OS and CSS have improved, and more patients, particularly with limited distant disease or favorable tumor subtypes, are also dying from non-MBC causes.

The majority of the over 250,000 new cases of invasive breast cancer diagnosed in the United States are driven by hormone receptor signaling (HR+). Since 2015, cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) have become the standard in combination with endocrine therapy (ET) for patients facing HR+ metastatic disease.There are now three approved agents in the HR+ metastatic setting such as abemaciclib, ribociclib, and palbociclib. Due to the almost doubling of progression-free survival (PFS) and improvement in overall survival (OS) in the metastatic setting, studies were conducted to examine the benefit of adding CDK4/6i in the adjuvant setting for those patients at high risk for recurrence. Despite negative results of PALLAS (palbociclib) in this setting, monarchE (abemaciclib) showed an improvement in invasive disease-free survival (IDFS) and distant recurrence-free survival (DRFS) at the 3-year time point for patients with high-risk tumor characteristics leading to its approval. Herein, we discuss the data, the population studied and for which abemaciclib is approved as well as safety, tolerability, and dose reductions for practical management of these patients.Abemaciclib is appropriate and beneficial for those patients with high-risk, node-positive, hormonally driven, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative (HER2-) breast cancer.

Up to half of all patients with metastatic human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive (HER2+) breast cancer will eventually acquire brain metastases (BrMs), which are associated with reduced overall survival and decreased quality of life. Although the median overall survival was previously less than a year, novel systemic treatments have significantly extended life expectancy in patients with HER2+ breast cancer BrMs. The current first-line standard of care for all patients with HER2+ metastatic breast cancer, regardless of BrMs status, is dual HER2 antibody therapy with pertuzumab/trastuzumab plus a taxane. Second-line systemic therapy has recently evolved, with the option of trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) or tucatinib in combination with trastuzumab and capecitabine. T-DXd has shown dramatically superior progression-free survival in comparison with trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) in patients with stable BrMs in the second-line setting. Patients who have untreated or locally treated/progressive BrMs may benefit from a regimen with robust intracranial response rates, such as tucatinib in combination with trastuzumab and capecitabine. Third-line therapy and beyond includes multiple options that require careful selection, with the patient's BrMs status, comorbidities, and performance status taken into account. In this review, we focus on current management and evolving strategies for the treatment of patients with HER2+ breast cancer BrMs.

Background: Fam-trastuzumab deruxtecan (DS-8201) was recently approved in patients with advanced/metastatic HER2 positive breast cancer who have received two or more prior HER2-based regimens. In DESTINY-Breast01, an unprecedented response rate was observed in 61% of heavily pretreated patients; however, all-grade interstitial lung disease (ILD) developed in almost 14% of patients, which led to death in 2% of patients. Additionally, patients with a medical history of clinically significant lung disease were excluded which is not consistent with the standard community patient population that may receive fam-trastuzumab deruxtecan. Currently, there are no recommended protocols in place or guidance for monitoring patients for interstitial lung disease/pneumonitis while on fam-trastuzumab deruxtecan. This is a retrospective chart review to assess the feasibility of implementing an ILD monitoring protocol in a cohort of patients receiving treatment with fam-trastuzumab deruxtecan at the Duke Cancer Institute. Methods: Patients with HER2-positive or HER2-low metastatic breast cancer who received ≥five cycles of fam-trastuzumab deruxtecan between Jan 1, 2020-June 30, 2020 were included. Chest imaging and pulmonary function testing with diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCO) were performed at baseline prior to initiation and every six weeks prior to cycle 3 and cycle 5 of fam-trastuzumab deruxtecan to monitor for ILD. DLCO was corrected for hemoglobin. Patients that experienced more than a 10% decrease in corrected DLCO (DLCOc) were recommended to have a pulmonology consult in which DLCOc was reviewed in combination with chest imaging and clinical history to evaluate for ILD and recommend continuance or cessation of the drug. Clinical pulmonary symptoms to include cough, shortness of breath, dyspnea, and new or worsening respiratory symptoms were monitored per chart review. Results: Seven patients with HER2-positive (N=6) and HER2-low (N=1) metastatic breast cancer were monitored per predefined ILD monitoring protocol with 100% completion of chest imaging and pulmonary function testing at baseline and prior to cycle 3 and cycle 5 indicating feasibility. There were no confirmed cases of ILD/pneumonitis within the patient cohort. Two patients (28.6%) experienced DLCOc decreases >10% warranting a pulmonology consult. Upon further assessment, ILD/pneumonitis was ruled out based on chest imaging and/or asymptomatic presentation and both patients continued therapy without treatment delay or development of pneumonitis to date. Both patients with DLCOc decrease >10% had a history of lung disease or significant metastatic disease involvement including asthma and lymphangitic carcinomatosis, respectively. In these patients, DLCOc, imaging and clinical history were able to safely rule out ILD. . Conclusion: Implementation of a comprehensive protocol to monitor and assess for ILD associated with fam-trastuzumab deruxtecan is feasible for patients receiving this therapy and may prevent treatment delay in patients with suspected ILD. In this small cohort, stable DCLOc suggests the absence of ILD onset in patients treated with fam-trastuzumab deruxtecan. DLCOc monitoring may be a reasonable measure to assess for ILD-related changes in patients. Further data collection is underway to understand the value of a comprehensive ILD monitoring protocol. Citation Format: Heather Moore, Scott Shofer, Amy Guisinger, Gloria Broadwater, Jeremy Force, Sarah Sammons, Carey Anders, Kelly Westbrook. Feasibility of a comprehensive monitoring protocol for the prevention and treatment of interstitial lung disease in patients undergoing treatment with fam-trastuzumab deruxtecan [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS13-33.

The estrogen receptor (ER/ESR1) is expressed in a majority of breast cancers and drugs that inhibit ER signaling are the cornerstone of breast cancer pharmacotherapy. Currently, aromatase inhibitors are the frontline endocrine interventions of choice although their durability in metastatic disease is limited by activating point mutations within the ligand-binding domain of ESR1 that permit ligand-independent activation of the receptor. It has been suggested that the most commonly occurring ESR1 mutations would likely compromise the clinical activity of selective estrogen receptor downregulators and selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) when used as second-line therapies. It was unclear, however, how these mutations, which are likely coexpressed in cells with ERWT, may impact response to ER ligands in a clinically meaningful manner. To address this issue, we dissected the molecular mechanism(s) underlying ESR1-mutant pharmacology in models relevant to metastatic disease. These studies revealed that the response of ESR1 mutations to ligands was dictated primarily by the relative coexpression of ERWT in cells. Specifically, dysregulated pharmacology was only evident in cells in which the mutants were overexpressed relative to ligand-activated ERWT; a finding that highlights the role of allelism in determining ER-mutant pharmacology. Importantly, we demonstrated that the antagonist activity of the SERM, lasofoxifene, was not impacted by mutant status; a finding that has led to its clinical evaluation as a treatment for patients with advanced ER-positive breast cancer whose tumors harbor ESR1 mutations.

Background: Meta-analyses have demonstrated that young women ≤40 (YW) derive the most benefit from chemotherapy (EBCTCG, Lancet. 1998). Oncotype DX was designed to determine the benefit of chemotherapy in women with ER+/HER2-, node-negative (LN-) breast cancer based on recurrence score (RS). TAILORx reported clinically meaningful benefits in freedom-from-distant recurrence in women Methods: Using the National Cancer Data Base (NCDB), we identified individuals age 25) RS. Age categories were classified as ≤40, 41-50, and >50. Chi-square tests or Fisher’s exact tests were used to compare categorical variables. Logistic regression was used to estimate the association of RS score and age group with adjuvant chemotherapy use, after adjustment for known covariates. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to visualize unadjusted overall survival (OS), and Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate adjusted OS. Results: 120,051 women were identified, of whom 4,781 were ≤40 years, 24,846 were 41-50, and 90,424 were >50. By age group, 20% of YW had a high RS compared to 12% of women age 41-50 and 15% of women >50 (p50 to receive chemotherapy (p Conclusions: High RS is more common in YW (≤40) than those age 41-50 or >50, and is associated with worse OS. YW with an int or low RS are more likely to receive chemotherapy despite unclear benefit. Chemotherapy was omitted in over half of YW with RS of 16-25, highlighting the uncertainty in clinical practice which will remain until further studies inform optimal systemic treatment specific to YW. 1. Sparano, J.A., et al., Clinical and Genomic Risk to Guide the Use of Adjuvant Therapy for Breast Cancer. New England Journal of Medicine, 2019. 380(25): p. 2395-2405. Citation Format: Sarah Sammons, Yi Ren, Jeremy Force, Oluwadamilola M. Fayanju, Laura H. Rosenberger, Jennifer K. Plichta, Gretchen Kimmick, Kelly Westbrook, Susan Dent, Carey Anders, Samantha M. Thomas, Terry Hyslop, E. S. Hwang, P. K. Marcom, Rachel A. Greenup. Characterization of oncotype DX recurrence score and chemotherapy utilization patterns in young women (≤40) with early stage ER+/HER-, lymph node negative breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-08-10.

Cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) in combination with backbone endocrine therapy have markedly improved progression-free survival and overall survival over endocrine therapy alone in advanced hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative (HR+/HER2-) breast cancer and are the standard of care in the first- or second-line setting. There are few data to drive decision making for subsequent treatment strategies after inevitable disease progression after CDK4/6i. Information about the genomic landscape of CDK4/6i-resistant disease is emerging. Resistance mechanisms appear to be varied, but mutations in PIK3CA and ESR1, which can be acquired while receiving treatment, are frequent. Activating PIK3CA mutations are present in up to 35% of patients and are now the most actionable genomic alteration in HR+/HER2- advanced breast cancer with the recent approval of alpelisib and fulvestrant. Everolimus-based combinations and chemotherapy appear to have continued efficacy after progression while receiving CDK4/6i, although historical data on benefit include CDK4/6i-naive patients. Use of selective estrogen down-regulators over aromatase inhibitors is best once the patient has an acquired ESR1 mutation. Tumor biopsy with genomic sequencing and repeat biomarker analysis in patients with CDK4/6i- and endocrine-resistant disease will be integral to guide subsequent treatment strategies and to inform clinical trial eligibility. Promising novel therapeutics in CDK4/6i-resistant disease including oral selective estrogen down-regulators, fibroblast growth factor receptor antagonists, and immunotherapy will be discussed.

The goal of our review is to describe the rationale for immunotherapy in the treatment of breast cancer brain metastases (BCBM), the current landscape of clinical trials for this disease process, and possible future directions based on anticipated results. Immune checkpoint inhibition has shown efficacy in the treatment of several solid tumor brain metastases (i.e., melanoma and non-small cell lung cancer), but data specific to BCBM is relatively sparse. Preclinical studies in BCBM have illustrated a lower immune content in the brain microenvironment measured by tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) in brain metastases compared to primary tumors. Yet, improved outcomes are associated with higher TIL content in the BCBM, and strategies to understand and alter the complex brain immune microenvironment are needed. Based on observations in the non-breast cancer setting and early results in advanced breast cancer, it is likely that novel, strategic combination immunotherapy strategies will be needed to yield meaningful outcomes for BCBM patients. Some exciting concepts underway include novel immunotherapy combinations, concurrent stereotactic radiosurgery, bi-specific antibody armed activated T cells, and HER2-chimeric antigen receptor T cells for leptomeningeal disease.

Purpose: Up to half of patients (pts) with HER2+ metastatic breast cancer (MBC) will develop BCBM. Trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) is an antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) with demonstrated efficacy in previously treated pts with HER2+ MBC. However, few pts with stable/treated brain metastases, and no pts with active (untreated or progressive) brain metastases, were included in completed clinical trials of T-DXd. Thus, central nervous system (CNS) efficacy of T-DXd is not well-characterized. Methods: We tested T-DXd in orthotopic pt BCBM-derived xenograft (PDX) models of HER2+, and HER2-low, BCBMs. To further validate T-DXd single agent CNS activity, we described clinical outcomes of T-DXd in a multi-institutional retrospective cohort of 16 patients with BCBM. Consecutive pts who initiated T-DXd between 1 Jan 2020 - 1 Nov 2020 (Duke) or 1 Jan 2020 - 15 June 2020 (Dana-Farber Cancer Institute) were included. Data cut-off date was 31 Dec 2020. CNS response was measured by via central radiology review at each participating institution. Up to 5 CNS target lesions were included. CNS partial response (PR) required >30% reduction in sum of CNS target lesions. Results: Treatment with 10 mg/kg T-DXd significantly prolonged survival in HER2+ BCBM PDX models DFBM-354 (67 vs 154 days, p=0.0018) and DFBM-355 (78 vs 156 days, p=0.0067) vs. vehicle control. We then tested TDX-d in a HER2 low BCBM PDX model (IHC 2+/FISH ratio Table 1.Best CNS Response of study cohortOverall population (n=16)Pts with progressive or untreated CNS disease at baseline (N=9)Pts with stable/treated CNS disease at baseline (N=7)Complete response (CR)0 (0)00 (0)Partial response (PR)10 (63)6 (67)#4 (57)+Stable disease (SD)2 (13)2 (22)0 (0)Progressive disease (PD)1 (6)0 (0)1 (14)No measurable CNS disease at baseline2 (13)0 (0)2 (29)Lost to follow-up1 (6)1 (11)0 (0).#Among these 6 pts, interval between most recent radiation and T-DXd initiation was 14.3 months, 12.4 months, 17 months, 18.2 months, and 8.2 months (one pt was radiation-naïve). +Among these 4 pts, interval between most recent radiation and T-DXd initiation was 19.1 months, 15.1 months, 1.5 months, and 16.9 months, respectively. Citation Format: Sheheryar Kabraji, Jing Ni, Sarah Sammons, Amanda ED Van Swearingen, Yanzhi Wang, Alyssa M Pereslete, Liangge Hsu, Chris Lascola, Heather Moore, Melissa Hughes, Akshara S Raghavendra, Maria Gule-Monroe, Rashmi K Murthy, Eric P Winer, Carey K Anders, Jean J Zhao, Nancy U Lin. Preclinical and clinical efficacy of trastuzumab deruxtecan in breast cancer brain metastases (BCBM) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD4-05.

Purpose: Brain metastases (BM) are a complication of advanced breast cancer (BC). Histology of melanoma BM offers prognostic value; however, understanding the microenvironment of breast cancer brain metastases (BCBM) is less characterized. This study reports on four histological biomarkers, gliosis, immune infiltrate, hemorrhage, necrosis, and their prognostic significance in BCBM. Methods: A biobank of 203 human tissues from patients who underwent craniotomy for BCBM was created across four academic institutions. Degree of gliosis, immune infiltrate, hemorrhage, and necrosis were identified and scored via representative H&E stain (0���3+). Overall survival (OS) was estimated using the Kaplan���Meier method. Cox proportional hazards regression evaluated prognostic value of the biomarkers in the context of standard clinical characteristics. Results: BCBM subtype (available for n = 158) was 36% Her2+, 26% hormone receptor (HR)+/Her2��� 38% HR���/Her2��� (triple negative, TN). Gliosis was observed in 82% (116/141) of BCBM, with immune infiltrate 44% (90/201), hemorrhage 82% (166/141), and necrosis 87% (176/201). Necrosis was significantly higher in TNBC (p < 0.01). Presence of gliosis, immune infiltrate, and hemorrhage correlated with improved OS (p = 0.03, p = 0.03, p = 0.1), while necrosis correlated with inferior OS (p = 0.01). Improved OS was associated with gliosis in TN (p = 0.02), and immune infiltrate (p = 0.001) and hemorrhage (p = 0.07) in HER2+. In a multivariable model for OS, incorporating these biomarkers with traditional clinical variables improved the model fit (p < 0.001). Conclusion: Gliosis confers superior prognosis in TNBC BM; immune infiltrate and hemorrhage correlate with superior prognosis in HER2+ BCBM. Understanding the metastatic microenvironment of BCBM refines prognostic considerations and may unveil novel therapeutic strategies.

Background: Triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) remains a heterogeneous clinical phenotype with few, known therapeutic targets. PARP inhibitors (PARPi) are the first approved, targeted therapy in TNBC, limited to germline BRCA mutant (BRCAm) cancers that lack homologous recombination repair capacity. Even in this context, resistance quickly emerges via secondary mutations that restore DNA repair ability. While DNA damage repair is an intriguing target in BRCA wild type (BRCAwt) TNBC due to inherent, genomic instability, PARPi alone have been ineffective in unselected populations. Systematic approaches to define novel drugs that sensitize BRCAwt and BRCAm TNBC to PARPi would greatly improve therapeutic efficacy and durability. Methods: BRCAwt (HCC1806) and BRCAm (SUM149PT) cell lines were screened in duplicate using a 2,100-compound small molecule library. Cell lines were plated in media containing DMSO or sub-lethal doses of the PARPi, olaparib, onto Selleck Bioactive drug plates. Cell viability was assessed after 72 hours, then normalized to vehicle control. Hit cut-offs were predefined as log2 drug/DMSO of ≤ -0.7 with a viability difference greater than 20% -where stringent scoring thresholds were chosen to exceed the full range of scores observed in 816 empty control wells. Hits were sorted by target and pathway to provide mechanistic insight into the synergy of combinations. Drug combinations with the highest potential for near term translation were validated using GI50 viability assays in 9 BRCAwt and BRCAm TNBC cell lines. The most promising combination was further validated via immunoblotting, colony formation, and apoptosis assays. Results: Several drug classes affecting well-known oncogenic signaling pathways conferred sensitivity to PARPi, with more hits in the BRCAm cell line. Relevant druggable targets sensitizing cells to olaparib in BRCAm TNBC that met the predefined cut-point were inhibitors of PI3K (pan-PI3K, PI3Kα and PI3Kβ specific), VEGFR, MEK, EGFR, NF-kB, aurora kinase and several DNA damaging agents. Aurora kinase, EGFR, and NF-kB inhibition sensitized cells to olaparib, yet upon further validation, synergy was mild. The screen identified ATM inhibitors, KU-55933 and KU-60019, as sensitizers of BRCAm cells to olaparib. The potent ATM inhibitor, AZD0156, and olaparib were a highly synergistic combination validated in all 9 BRCAm and BRCAwt TNBC cell lines via cell viability, annexin V, and colony formation assays. Immunoblotting of relevant DNA damage repair proteins showed that olaparib caused upregulation of p-ATM in BRCAm and BRCAwt cells. p-ATM expression decreased in response to combination ATM and PARP inhibition. Attenuated levels of p-ATM resulted in increased levels of p- and T-γH2AX, indicating an accumulation of double stranded DNA breaks. Conclusion: In vitro, inhibition of several relevant, oncogenic pathways yielded sensitivity to PARPi in TNBC. We identified the ATM inhibitor, AZD0156, and olaparib as a potent combination regardless of BRCA status, a finding currently being evaluated in patient-derived in vivo models. Combination ATM plus PARP inhibitor therapy is a promising and feasible approach for near term translation in metastatic TNBC. Citation Format: Sammons S, Yip C, Anderson G, Force J, Marcom K, Westbrook K, Anders CK, Blackwell K, Wood K. Small-molecule screening nominates diverse combination therapies that sensitize BRCA mutant and wild-type triple negative breast cancer to PARP inhibition [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-06-04.

Background: BRCA mutated (BRCA+) breast cancers are expected to have increased activation of Homologous Recombination Deficiency (HRD) and altered DNA damage repair pathways when compared to BRCA wildtype (BRCA-). To better understand differences in these populations, biological patterns and immune responses to BRCA+ breast cancers were evaluated. The primary aim of our study was to use novel gene expression tools to assess early stage breast cancers with and without germline BRCA mutations, and within distinct BRCA+ subgroups. Methods: We identified 124 early stage untreated breast cancers with and without BRCA mutations (n = 62 and 62, respectively). Our BRCA- group was matched by hormone receptor (HR) status, age, and stage to the BRCA+ group. The NanoString Breast Cancer 360 panel was applied to RNA isolated from 80 breast tumors (BRCA+ = 39; BRCA- = 41). The BRCA+ group had a BRCA1+ subgroup (n=17) and a BRCA2+ subgroup (n=22). Results: There was a significant increase in two BC360 signatures in both the BRCA1+ and BRCA2+ tumors compared with the BRCA- population: Prosigna™Risk of Recurrence (ROR) score [BRCA1+: HR: 1.142 (95% CI 1.019, 1.279), p=0.02; BRCA2+: HR: 1.321 (95% CI 1.190, 1.466), p Conclusions: In early stage BRCA+ breast cancer, tumors have higher ROR and increased HRD signature scores compared to BRCA- tumors. Furthermore, BRCA1+ and BRCA2+ tumors have both signature and single gene expression differences when compared to BRCA- tumors, indicating distinct subgroup-related biology. The greater correlation of BRCA1+ tumors with basal-like biology and BRCA2+ tumors with aggressive hormonal biology confirms these trends. Distinctions in hormone receptor signaling, DNA-damage pathways, and microenvironment/inflammatory features between BRCA1 and BRCA2 associated cancers suggest a need for different prevention and therapeutic strategies for each of these breast cancer subtypes. The unique biological patterns identified here should be further evaluated as predictive or prognostic tools that could be translated into clinical care for early stage BRCA+ patients. Citation Format: Force J, Plichta J, Stashko I, Kimmick G, Westbrook K, Sammons S, Hwang S, Hyslop T, Kauff N, Castellar E, Nair S, Weinhold K, Davis S, Mashadi-Hossein A, Brauer HA, Marcom PK. Distinct biological signatures describe differences in BRCA mutated subgroups [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-08-07.

Background: LMD is a devastating clinical outcome of advanced BC with a median survival of 4.4 months for the HER2+ subtype. There are few effective treatments for LMD. T-DXd has shown excellent extracranial efficacy in the DESTINY-Breast01/03 trials for metastatic HER2+ BC, including the stable brain metastases (BrM) subgroups. The efficacy of T-DXd in HER2+ untreated BrM and LMD is unknown. We present a case series of 6 patients with HER2+ LMD treated with T-DXd. Methods: Six patients with HER2+ BC with LMD (based on imaging +/- positive cytology) who had received T-DXd prior to 10/18/21 and had undergone at least 1 restaging evaluation were identified at Duke Cancer Institute and Dana Farber Cancer Institute. Data was extracted from patients’ electronic medical records and entered into a secure, patient de-identified database. Objective MRI response was defined as neuroimaging with definitive improvement assessed by neuroradiologist review without signs of clinical progression. Clinical benefit (CB) is defined as stable disease or objective response by neuroimaging without clinical progression. Results: Of the 6 patients included, median age was 42.5 years with 5 median lines of prior therapy. All 6 patients (100%) derived CB and 5/6 (83.3%) had objective response on MRI. Patients were treated with a median 6.5 (5-23) cycles. Median duration of T-DXd therapy was 5.3 months (4.1-16.9) with 4/6 patients receiving ongoing treatment. The median survival from initial diagnosis of LMD to death or last follow-up was 12.5 months. Results are summarized in Table 1. Conclusion: In this case series, 5/6 patients had radiographic responses without clinical progression, with median duration of treatment nearing 6 months and 4/6 patients continuing T-DXd at data cutoff. This series provides rationale for prospective evaluation of T-DXd in HER2+ LMD patients across tumor types. Table 1. Demographic and clinical information T-DXd in HER2+ BC LMD - Demographic and Clinical Information*Data cut-off: 10/18/21 Demographic Characteristic (n=6) # (%) or median (range) Median age at T-DXd, years (range) 42.5 (37 - 56) ER Status Positive Negative 4 (66.7%)2 (33.3%) Site DFCI Duke 4 (66.7%)2 (33.3%) Clinical Information (n=6) # (%) or median (range) Median # of therapies prior to T-DXd Prior HER2 TKI 5 (4-6)6 (100%) T-DXd Treatment Median # cycles Total time on DS-8201 (months) 6.5 (5-23)5.3 (4.1-16.9) Response on first MRI post-C1D1 T-DXd Yes No 5 (83.3%)1 (16.6%) Still on T-DXd Treatment Yes No 4 (66.7%)2 (33.3%) Median survival since LMD diagnosis (months) 12.5 (6.8 - 20.6) Citation Format: Laura Alder, Dario Trapani, Amanda Van Swearingen, Mustafa Khasraw, Carey Anders, Nancy Lin, Sarah Sammons. Durable clinical and radiographic responses in a series of patients with HER2+ Breast Cancer (BC) Leptomeningeal Disease (LMD) treated with trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr 5257.

1030 Background: Novel prognostic and predictive biomarkers beyond traditional histological subtypes are needed to better inform outcomes and enhance therapy guidance in breast cancer (BC). We have previously reported that ILF2 was overexpressed in TNBC cell lines and has a functional role in DNA and RNA metabolism, making it a promising biomarker for risk assessment and treatment decisions. Herein, we aim to leverage a large clinico-genomic dataset to further characterize ILF2 in BC patients (pts). Methods: A total of 9456 BC tissue samples underwent molecular profiling at Caris Life Sciences (Phoenix, AZ). Analyses included next generation sequencing of DNA (592 Gene Panel, or Whole Exome Sequencing), and RNA (Whole Transcriptome Sequencing), and immunohistochemistry (IHC). Wilcoxon and Fisher’s exact were used to determine statistical significance. Overall survival (OS) was obtained from insurance claims and Kaplan-Meier estimates were calculated. Spearman correlation was used to identify highly correlated genes (ρ>0.6) with ILF2 and significant genes that were subsequently analyzed via pathway analysis using STRING. Results: BC pts were grouped into ILF2-High (H, top quartile) and ILF2-Low (L, bottom quartile) based on mRNA expression (TPM). ILF2-H pts were significantly younger (73 vs 80% for pts >50), enriched in ductal histology (90.9 vs 77.7%), TNBC subtype (48.9 vs 18.9%), and had a higher CNS metastases rate (4.3 vs 1.4%) compared to ILF2-L pts (all q

1045 Background: In patients (pts) with stable or no extracranial disease (ECD) presenting with breast cancer brain metastases (BCBrMs), current guidelines recommend pts receive local therapy with radiation +/- surgery, without changing systemic therapy. However, preliminary studies suggest that pts with isolated HER2+ BCBrM without ECD have inferior overall survival (OS) compared to pts with concurrent ECD. Our study further explores the implications of ECD status on intracranial progression free survival (iPFS) and OS. Methods: Retrospective analysis was performed on data from 153 pts diagnosed with initial HER2+ BCBrM who received CNS radiation at Duke between 2008 and 2020. Demographics, dates of metastatic and BCBrM diagnosis, ECD status at first CNS event, systemic therapy, and outcomes were collected. The primary endpoint was iPFS defined as the time from first CNS radiation to the subsequent documentation of intracranial progression (RANO-BM). OS was defined as time from first CNS radiation and first metastatic disease to date of death or last known contact. ECD status was defined by RECIST1.1 from systemic staging scans within 30 days of first CNS event. Results: In this cohort of 153 pts with HER2+ BCBrMs undergoing CNS radiation, > 70% of pts with known ECD status had controlled systemic disease: either no ECD (27%) or stable/responding disease (44%). 64% of pts’ tumors were ER+. Median age was 50 years (range 24 – 75). Most pts (59%) developed first CNS event during adjuvant or 1st/2nd line metastatic therapy. CNS radiation treatment included 48% of pts receiving SRS only, 9% WBRT only, and 43% SRS and WBRT. All pts with no ECD presented with isolated BCBrMs as first metastatic disease. Among pts with known ECD status, OS from initial metastatic disease to death was markedly worse for pts with isolated brain metastases or no ECD (median = 28.4m, 95% CI: 18.1 to not reached) compared to those with progressive or stable/responding ECD (48.8m, 95% CI: 40.5 to 65.0; and 68.1m, 95% CI: 55.2 to 85.7, respectively; log-rank p = 0.004). OS from first CNS involvement to death was significantly worse for pts with progressive ECD (17.8m, 95% CI: 13.7 to 28.8) versus stable/responding (36.6m, 95% CI: 29.7 to 45.2) or no ECD (28.4m, 95% CI: 18.1 to not reached; log-rank p = 0.008). iPFS did not differ statistically among subgroups of pts with known ECD status: progressive ECD (median = 7.7m), no ECD (8.3m), or stable/responding ECD (11.2m) (log-rank p = 0.15). Conclusions: Overall survival in pts with HER2+ isolated BCBrM was markedly inferior to that of pts with progressive or stable/responding ECD. Studies investigating initiation of brain penetrable HER2-targeted therapies earlier in the disease course of isolated HER2+ BCBrMs pts are warranted.

1021 Background: Imlunestrant is a novel, orally bioavailable SERD with pure antagonistic properties that result in sustained inhibition of ER-dependent gene transcription and cell growth. In dose escalation, imlunestrant showed favorable safety, pharmacokinetics (PK) and preliminary efficacy in patients with ER+, HER2- aBC and ER+ EEC (Phase 1a EMBER, Jhaveri 2021). Here we present updated data from the dose escalation (Phase 1a) and dose expansion (Phase 1b) of imlunestrant monotherapy in EMBER (NCT04188548). Methods: Phase 1a/1b enrolled patients with ER+ aBC (prior ET sensitivity; ≤3 prior therapies for aBC in Phase 1a following protocol amendment and ≤2 in Phase 1b) and ER+ EEC (prior platinum therapy; no prior fulvestrant or aromatase inhibitor). Premenopausal women received a concomitant GnRH agonist. Serial plasma samples were obtained for PK and ctDNA analysis. Key endpoints included recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) determination, safety and tolerability, PK, objective response rate per RECIST v1.1 (ORR: complete response [CR] or partial response [PR]) in patients with measurable disease and ≥1 post-baseline tumor assessment or discontinued prior to tumor assessment, and clinical benefit rate (CBR: CR or PR, or stable disease ≥24 weeks) in patients enrolled ≥24 weeks prior to data cut. Results: As of January 14, 2022, 138 patients (n = 114 aBC, n = 24 EEC) received imlunestrant monotherapy at doses ranging from 200-1200 mg QD. Median age was 62.0 years (range 32-95). Median number of prior therapies for aBC and EEC was 2 (range 0-8) and 1 (0-5), respectively. aBC patients had received a prior ET (94.7%), CDK4/6 inhibitor (92.1%), fulvestrant (50.9%) and chemotherapy (26.3%). No dose-limiting toxicities were observed. Most treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were grade 1. At the RP2D (400 mg QD, n= 69), the most common all grade TEAE’s were nausea (33.3%), fatigue (27.5%), and diarrhea (23.2%). Across all doses, the incidence of treatment-related grade 3 AEs was low (3.6%). No patient discontinued due to a TEAE. In evaluable aBC patients, ORR was 8.0% (6/75) and CBR was 40.4% (42/104). In evaluable EEC patients, ORR was 5.0% (1/20 had a PR- ongoing pending confirmation) and CBR was 47.1% (8/17). Clinical benefit was observed regardless of baseline ESR1 mutation status as determined by ctDNA sequencing. Additional biomarker analyses will be presented at the meeting. Conclusions: Imlunestrant continues to demonstrate a favorable side effect profile, with no cardiac or opthalmic safety signals, and has continued evidence of clinical activity in heavily pre-treated ER+ aBC and EEC patients. Clinical trial information: NCT04188548.

INTRODUCTIONWe performed a retrospective analysis of longitudinal real-world data (RWD) from breast cancer patients to replicate results from clinical studies and demonstrate the feasibility of generating real-world evidence. We also assessed the value of transcriptome profiling as a complementary tool for determining molecular subtypes.PATIENTS AND METHODSDe-identified, longitudinal data were analyzed after abstraction from U.S. breast cancer patient records structured and stored in the Tempus database. Demographics, clinical characteristics, molecular subtype, treatment history, and survival outcomes were assessed according to strict qualitative criteria. RNA sequencing and clinical data were used to predict molecular subtypes and signaling pathway enrichment.RESULTSThe clinical abstraction cohort (n=4,000) mirrored U.S. breast cancer demographics and clinical characteristics indicating feasibility for RWE generation. Among HER2+ patients, 74.2% received anti-HER2 therapy, with ~70% starting within 3 months of a positive test result. Most non-treated patients were early stage. In this RWD set, 31.7% of patients with HER2+ IHC had discordant FISH results recorded. Among patients with multiple HER2 IHC results at diagnosis, 18.6% exhibited intra-test discordance. Through development of a whole-transcriptome model to predict IHC receptor status in the molecular sequenced cohort (n=400), molecular subtypes were resolved for all patients (n=36) with equivocal HER2 statuses from abstracted test results. Receptor-related signaling pathways were differentially enriched between clinical molecular subtypes.CONCLUSIONRWD in the Tempus database mirrors the overall U.S. breast cancer population. These results suggest real-time, RWD analyses are feasible in a large, highly heterogeneous database. Furthermore, molecular data may aid deficiencies and discrepancies observed from breast cancer RWD.

Breast cancer is a disease of aging, and the incidence of breast cancer is projected to increase dramatically as the global population ages. The majority of breast cancers that occur in older adults are hormone-receptor positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2)-negative phenotypes, with favorable tumor biology; yet, because of underrepresentation in clinical trials, less evidence is available to guide the complex care for this population. Providing care for older patients with metastatic breast cancer, with coexisting medical conditions, increased risk of treatment toxicity, and frailty, remains a clinical challenge in oncology. In this review, we provide an overview of the current evidence from clinical trials and subanalyses of older adults with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer, highlighting data on the safety and efficacy of oral therapies, including endocrine therapy alone or in combination with cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 4/6 inhibitors, phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) inhibitors, and mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors. In addition, we note the significant underrepresentation of older and frail adults in these studies. Current and future directions in research for this special population, in order to address significant knowledge gaps, include the need to improve long-term adherence to hormonal and targeted therapy, prospective clinical trials that capture clinical and biological aging endpoints, and the need for a multidisciplinary approach with integration of geriatric and oncology principles.

The median age for breast cancer diagnosis is 62 years, but a disproportionate number of patients are over the age of 75 years and the majority of those have hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2)-negative cancers. This review provides a logical algorithm to guide providers through the many complicated issues involved in adjuvant systemic therapy decisions in older patients with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer. For this subtype of breast cancer, the mainstay of treatment is surgery and adjuvant endocrine therapy with tamoxifen or an aromatase inhibitor (AI). Adjuvant chemotherapy is added to the treatment regimen when the benefits of treatment are deemed to outweigh the risks, making the risk-benefit discussion particularly important in older women. Traditional tools for cancer risk assessment and genomic expression profiles (GEPs) are under-utilized in older patients, but yield equally useful information about cancer prognosis as they do in younger patients. Additionally, there are tools that estimate life-limiting toxicity risk from chemotherapy and life expectancy, which are both important issues in the risk-benefit discussion. For very low-risk cancers, such as non-invasive and small lymph node (LN)-negative cancers, the benefits of any adjuvant therapy is likely outweighed by the risks, but endocrine therapy might be considered to prevent future new breast cancers. For invasive tumors that are 5 mm (T1b or larger) or involve LNs, adjuvant endocrine therapy is recommended. Generally, AIs should be included, though tamoxifen is effective and should be offered when AIs are not tolerated. Bone-preserving agents and high-dose vitamin D are options to preserve bone density or treat osteoporosis, especially in older women who are taking AIs. Where the risk-reducing benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy outweighs the toxicity risk, adjuvant chemotherapy should be considered. Adjuvant chemotherapy has similar benefits in older and younger patients and standard regimens are preferred. Several exciting clinic trials are underway and have included older patients, including those adding molecularly targeted agents, cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 4/6 inhibitors and everolimus, to endocrine therapy in the adjuvant setting. The high incidence of breast cancer in older women should drive us to design clinical trials for this population and emphasize their inclusion in ongoing trials as much as possible.

The estrogen receptor (ER/ESR1) is expressed in a majority of breast cancers and drugs that inhibit ER signaling are the cornerstone of breast cancer pharmacotherapy. Currently, aromatase inhibitors are the frontline endocrine interventions of choice although their durability in metastatic disease is limited by activating point mutations within the ligand binding domain (LBD) of ESR1 that permit ligand independent activation of the receptor. It has been suggested that the most commonly occurring ESR1 mutations would likely compromise the clinical activity of selective estrogen receptor downregulators (SERDs) and selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) when used as second-line therapies. It was unclear, however, how these mutations, which are likely coexpressed in cells with ER(WT), may impact response to ER ligands in a clinically meaningful manner. To address this issue, we dissected the molecular mechanism(s) underlying ESR1 mutant pharmacology in models relevant to metastatic disease. These studies revealed that the response of ESR1 mutations to ligands was dictated primarily by the relative coexpression of ER(WT) in cells. Specifically, dysregulated pharmacology was only evident in cells in which the mutants were overexpressed relative to ligand-activated ER(WT); a finding that highlights the role of allelism in determining ER mutant pharmacology. Importantly, we demonstrated that the antagonist activity of the SERM, lasofoxifene, was not impacted by mutant status; a finding that has led to its clinical evaluation as a treatment for patients with advanced ER-positive breast cancer whose tumors harbor ESR1 mutations.

Fulvestrant is recommended for patients with hormone receptor-positive (HR+) advanced breast cancer (ABC) who progress after aromatase inhibitor therapy. As most patients in this setting have already developed mechanisms of resistance to endocrine therapy, targeting biological pathways associated with endocrine resistance in combination with fulvestrant may improve outcomes. Therefore, evidence supporting a combinatorial treatment approach in the second-line setting was investigated based on a search of PubMed and ClinicalTrials.gov . Twenty-eight studies of targeted therapies plus fulvestrant as second-line treatment for HR+ ABC were identified, including three and six key randomized trials exploring cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 (CDK4/6) inhibitors and phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K)/mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors plus fulvestrant respectively. Additional combinations with fulvestrant included inhibitors of epidermal growth factor receptors, androgen receptor, and the bromodomain and extra-terminal family of proteins. Across the studies reviewed with available data, the addition of targeted therapies to fulvestrant resulted in clinically meaningful improvements in progression-free survival compared with fulvestrant alone. While some challenging toxicities were observed, most adverse events could be effectively managed. Selection of second-line targeted therapy for use with fulvestrant should consider prior treatment as well as the mutation status of the tumor. In conclusion, available data indicate that fulvestrant combined with agents targeting mechanisms of endocrine resistance is a promising approach. The ongoing trials identified in this review will help further inform the selection of combination treatments with fulvestrant for HR+ ABC.

The interplay between the immune system and tumor progression is well recognized. However, current human breast cancer immunophenotyping studies are mostly focused on primary tumors with metastatic breast cancer lesions remaining largely understudied. To address this gap, we examined exome-capture RNA sequencing data from 50 primary breast tumors (PBTs) and their patient-matched metastatic tumors (METs) in brain, ovary, bone and gastrointestinal tract. We used gene expression signatures as surrogates for tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) and compared TIL patterns in PBTs and METs. Enrichment analysis and deconvolution methods both revealed that METs had a significantly lower abundance of total immune cells, including CD8+ T cells, regulatory T cells and dendritic cells. An exception was M2-like macrophages, which were significantly higher in METs across the organ sites examined. Multiplex immunohistochemistry results were consistent with data from the in-silico analysis and showed increased macrophages in METs. We confirmed the finding of a significant reduction in immune cells in brain METs (BRMs) by pathologic assessment of TILs in a set of 49 patient-matched pairs of PBT/BRMs. These findings indicate that METs have an overall lower infiltration of immune cells relative to their matched PBTs, possibly due to immune escape. RNAseq analysis suggests that the relative levels of M2-like macrophages are increased in METs, and their potential role in promoting breast cancer metastasis warrants further study.

Background In patients with isolated HER2+ BrCBM and no extracranial disease (ECD), there are no consensus guidelines on optimal treatment approaches following CNS-directed therapy. Our goal was to determine the implications of ECD at time of first HER2+ BrCBM on intracranial progression-free survival (PFS1) and overall survival (OS). Methods Retrospective analysis was performed on 77 patients with HER2+ BrCBM who received 1st CNS radiation from 2006–2020. Demographics, dates of metastatic and intracranial diagnosis, ECD status at 1st BrCBM, and outcomes were collected. The primary endpoint was PFS1 defined as time from first CNS radiation to the subsequent documentation of intracranial progression (RANO-BM). OS was defined as time from 1st CNS radiation and 1st metastatic disease to date of death/last known alive. ECD status was defined by RECIST1.1 from staging scans within 30 days of 1st BrCBM. Results In this patient cohort, 25% (19/77) had isolated brain relapse/no ECD. Median age was 50 years. Most patients (58%) developed first BrCBM during adjuvant or early-line metastatic therapy. All patients with no ECD presented with isolated brain relapse as first metastatic presentation. Patients with concurrent ECD presented with first BrCBM at a median of 16.6m (95% CI: 10.5 to 25.3) after initial metastatic presentation. Median OS from initial metastatic presentation to death was worse for patients with isolated brain relapse (25.3m, 95% CI: 16.8 to 35.3) compared to those with concurrent ECD (49.7m, 95% CI: 43.2 to 62; p=0.01). Median OS from first CNS involvement to death was not statistically different amongst groups. Conclusions Patients with isolated HER2+ BrCBM as their initial metastatic event have substantially worse OS compared to patients with concurrent ECD developing CNS metastases later in their disease course. This population with isolated brain relapse deserves investigation of novel treatment algorithms, including earlier introduction of brain-penetrable HER2-targeted agents.

1095 Background: Treatments for metastatic breast cancer (MBC) have significantly improved survival for patients who receive treatment, yet data describing the prognosis for untreated patients is lacking. Therefore, we sought to assess the survival outcomes of patients with de novo MBC who did not receive treatment. Methods: Adults with MBC at diagnosis (clinical M1 or pathologic M1) were selected from the NCDB (2010-2016) and stratified based on receipt of treatment (treated = received at least one treatment; untreated = received no treatments). Differences between patient groups were tested using Chi-square tests for categorical variables and t-tests for continuous variables. Overall survival (OS) was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method for the overall cohort and stratified by select patient and/or disease characteristics, and groups were compared with log-rank tests. Cox Proportional Hazards models were used to identify factors associated with OS in the untreated MBC subgroup. Results: Of the 53,240 patients with de novo MBC, the median age was 61y (IQR 52-71), and the majority had a comorbidity score of 0 (81.2%). Within this cohort, 49,040 (92.1%) received at least one treatment (treated) and 4,200 (7.9%) had no documented treatments (untreated). Untreated patients were more likely to be older (median 68y vs 61y, p < 0.001) and have higher comorbidity scores (p < 0.001). Patients with untreated MBC were more likely to have triple negative disease (17.8% vs 12.6%), and a higher disease burden (≥2 metastatic sites: 38.2% untreated vs 29.2% treated, p < 0.001). The median unadjusted OS in the untreated subgroup was 2.5mo vs 36.4mo in the treated subgroup (p < 0.001). For those who survived at least 1mo post-diagnosis, the median unadjusted OS in the untreated subgroup was 6.9mo vs 37.3mo in the treated subgroup (p < 0.001), which increased to 18.6mo and 40.3mo for those who survived at least 3mo post-diagnosis (p < 0.001). In the untreated population, unadjusted OS varied by breast cancer subtype (median 3.8mo for HR+/HER2-, vs 2.6mo for HER2+, vs 2.1mo for triple negative, p < 0.001) and number of metastatic sites (4.1mo for 1 site, vs 1.8mo for 2 sites, vs 1.1mo for 3 sites, vs 1.2mo for ≥4 sites, p < 0.001). After adjustment, variables associated with a worse OS in the untreated cohort included older age, higher comorbidity scores, higher tumor grade, and triple negative (vs HR+/HER2-) tumor subtype (all p < 0.05), while the number of metastatic sites was not associated with survival; these same findings were also noted when the analysis was limited to those who survived at least 1mo post-diagnosis. Conclusions: Patients with de novo MBC who do not receive treatment are more likely to be older, present with comorbid conditions, and have clinically aggressive disease. Similar to those who do receive treatment, survival in an untreated population is associated with select patient and disease characteristics. However, the prognosis for untreated MBC is dismal.

1034 Background: The Ras-MAPK pathway is a known driver of tumorigenesis and therapeutic target in a variety of cancers. Alterations in this pathway have been linked to decreased tumor immunogenicity. However, molecular alterations in the Ras-MAPK are rare in breast cancer (BC) and their clinical implications remain unclear. As mutational status does not accurately correlate with transcriptional activity, a MAPK pathway activity score (MPAS, Wagle et al., 2018, npj Precision Medicine) is indicative of MAPK activation and correlates with response to MEK (MEKi) or BRAF inhibition (BRAFi). Our goal was to determine the frequency of molecular alterations in the Ras-MAPK and correlate to MAPK pathway activation in MBC. Methods: A total of 6464 BC samples underwent comprehensive molecular profiling at Caris Life Sciences. Analyses included next generation sequencing of DNA (592 Gene Panel, NextSeq; whole exome sequencing, NovaSEQ), RNA (NovaSeq, whole transcriptome sequencing, WTS) and IHC. MPAS and immune cell fraction (ICF, Quantiseq) were assessed by mRNA analysis. Wilcoxon, Fisher’s exact, or Dunnett’s test was used. All results shown were statistically significant (p < 0.05). Results: The predominant alteration of RAS genes was mutation followed by amplification, no fusions were detected (Table). Only 0.17% of all tumors harbor KRAS G12c mutations. The highest MPAS scores were found in KRAS mutants (mut), HRAS mut (Q61, G1213), BRAF V600 (class 1) mut and NRAS Q61 mut (Table) and therefore used to define Genomic MAPK Activated Tumors (GMAT). GMAT compared to wild type (WT) had significantly higher PD-L1 expression, TMB and MSI/dMMR. GMAT had less B cells (3.4% vs 4.4%), more M1 Macrophages (4.4% vs 3.4%) and neutrophils (5.5% vs 2.7%) regardless of HR status but less NK cells (2.3% s 3.0%), MSDCs (0.9% vs 3.0%) only in HR- tumors with respect to WT. GMAT tumors showed more frequent mutation rate (mr) of PIK3CA (HR+: 57.3% vs 40%; HR-: 41.9% vs 17.9%). HR+ tumors had a higher mr of MSH3 (11.8% vs 0.6%) while HR- tumors had higher mr of PIK3R1 (9.6% vs 3.8%), RhoA (5.3% vs 0.5%), DNA repair genes (TERT, 18.2% vs 1.0%; ARID1A, 18.2% vs 5.9%; PRKDC, 3.9% vs 0) and lower TP53 mr (54.5% vs 85.8%) compared to WT. Conclusions: Our study demonstrates that RAS, BRAF and MEK1 mutations are associated with MAPK pathway activation indicative of benefit from MEKi or BRAFi. GMAT warrant further investigation for combinations targeting the RAS-MAPK pathway and immune checkpoint inhibitors.[Table: see text]

1091 Background: Tumor mutational burden (TMB) has emerged as an imperfect biomarker of immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) outcomes in solid tumors. Despite the approval for pembrolizumab in all TMB-high (TMB-H) solid tumors, the optimal clinical approach to TMB-H or hypermutated advanced/metastatic breast cancer (MBC) is unknown with sparse prospective data. We hypothesize that TMB-H MBC will have unique genomic alterations compared to TMB-low (TMB-L) breast cancer that could inform novel therapeutic approaches. Methods: Tumor samples (N = 5621) obtained from patients with MBC were analyzed by next-generation sequencing (NGS) of DNA (592-gene panel or whole exome sequencing) and RNA (whole transcriptome sequencing) at Caris Life Sciences (Phoenix, AZ). TMB was calculated based on recommendations from the Friends of Cancer Research TMB Harmonization Project (Merino et al., 2020), with the TMB-H threshold set to ≥ 10 muts/Mb. IHC was performed for PD-L1 (Ventana SP142 ≥1% immune cells). Deficient mismatch repair (dMMR)/high microsatellite instability (MSI-H) was tested by IHC and NGS, respectively. Results: TMB-H was identified in 8.2% (n = 461) of MBC samples, with similar frequencies observed across molecular subtypes (7.8-8.6%, p = 0.85): HR+/HER2- (n = 3087) 7.8%, HR+/HER2+ (n = 266) 8.3%, HR-/HER2+ (n = 179) 7.8%, TNBC (n = 1476) 8.6%. The frequency of TMB-H was significantly increased in lobular (16%) versus ductal (5%) MBC (p < 0.01). TMB-H samples were enriched in genitourinary (42%), soft tissue (20%), and gastrointestinal non-liver (16%) biopsy specimens. Compared to TMB-L tumors, TMB-H tumors exhibited significantly higher mutation rates for TP53 (60 v 52%), PIK3CA (55 vs 31%), ARID1A (34 vs 11%), CDH1 (27 vs 11%), NF1 (22 vs 9%), RB1 (14 vs 5%), KMT2C (12 vs 7%), PTEN (12 vs 7%), ERBB2 (7 vs 2.9%), and PALB2 (3.3 vs 1%) genes (p < 0.05 each). Copy number alteration and fusion rates did not differ between TMB-H and TMB-L breast cancers. PI3K/AKT/MTOR, TP53, Histone/Chromatin remodeling, DNA damage repair (DDR), RAS, and cell cycle pathway alterations were detected in > 25% TMB-H MBCs (p < 0.05 each). dMMR/MSI-High (7.2 vs 0.3%, p < 0.01) and PD-L1 positivity (36 vs 28%, p < 0.05) frequencies were significantly increased in TMB-H tumors. DNA signature analyses including APOBEC and homologous recombination repair deficiency, as well as gene expression profiling to assess immune-related signatures and tumor microenvironment are underway. Conclusions: TMB-H breast cancers contain a unique genomic profile enriched with targetable mutations such as PIK3CA, ARID1A, NF1, PTEN, ERBB2, and PALB2. Concurrent predictive biomarkers of response to immune checkpoint inhibition such as MSI-H and PDL-1 positivity are also more prevalent in TMB-H MBC. These findings suggest novel combination strategies within TMB-H MBC could be explored.

1050 Background: Novel degraders and antagonists of ER are under evaluation in aBC, to overcome both ER mediated resistance and the bioavailability and dosing limitations of fulvestrant, the only approved SERD. ER is also overexpressed in ̃80% of EEC and endocrine therapy (ET) is utilized for these patients (pts). LY3484356, a novel, orally bioavailable SERD with pure antagonistic properties results in sustained inhibition of ER-dependent gene transcription and cell growth. Preclinically, LY3484356 shows favorable efficacy and pharmacokinetic (PK) properties, including antitumor activity in ESR1 mutants. Here we present the initial clinical data from EMBER, an ongoing first-in-human phase 1a/b trial of this novel agent. Methods: Phase 1a evaluated LY3484356 dose escalation (i3+3 design) in women with ER+, HER2- aBC (≤3 prior therapies for aBC following protocol amendment; prior ET sensitivity) and ER+ EEC (prior platinum therapy). Premenopausal women received a concomitant GnRH agonist. Key endpoints included determination of the recommended phase 2 dose, safety and tolerability, PK, and objective response rate and clinical benefit rate per RECIST v1.1. Results: As of the data cut (November 9, 2020), 28 pts (n = 24 aBC, n = 4 EEC) were enrolled at doses ranging from 200-1200 mg QD. Median age was 59 years (range, 35-80). Median number of prior therapies for aBC was 2 (range, 1-8; 6 pts enrolled prior to protocol amendment had received ≥4 prior therapies), including prior fulvestrant (46%), a CDK4/6 inhibitor (83%), and chemotherapy (33%). No dose-limiting toxicities were observed. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were mostly grade 1-2, including nausea (32%), fatigue (25%), and diarrhea (18%). The only grade 3 treatment-related AE was diarrhea (n = 1). TEAEs of bradycardia and QTc prolongation were not observed despite intensive central ECG monitoring. Dose-proportional increases in LY3484356 exposures were observed across all evaluated doses and t1/2 was 25-30 hours. At the starting dose level (200 mg QD), unbound LY3484356 exposures exceeded those achieved with fulvestrant. 16 of 28 pts were efficacy evaluable, with the remaining 12 pts ongoing prior to first scan. Among 16 evaluable pts, 11 (8 aBC, 3 EEC) had stable disease (10 pts ongoing), and 5 had progressive disease. RECIST responses were observed after the data cut and will be detailed at the meeting. Plasma ctDNA analysis indicated decreases in mutant allele frequencies, including mutant ESR1 in 9/12 (75%) evaluable pts across all dose levels. Conclusions: LY3484356 QD dosing shows favorable safety and PK properties, along with preliminary efficacy in pts with heavily pretreated ER+ aBC and EEC. Updated data will be presented at the meeting. Clinical trial information: NCT04188548 .

1041 Background: BCBMs are very common in metastatic HER2+ breast cancer. CNS-directed local therapy is the gold standard for treatment, followed by systemic HER2-targeted therapies. In patients with HER2+ BCBM and stable extracranial disease (ECD), consensus guidelines recommend continuing current systemic therapy after local therapy. Our goal was to determine the implications of ECD status at time of HER2+ BCBM first CNS involvement on outcomes including intracranial progression-free survival (PFS1) and overall survival (OS). Methods: Retrospective analysis was performed on data extracted from 77 patients with HER2+ BCBM who received CNS radiation at Duke between 2006 and 2020 following initial documentation of CNS involvement. Demographics, dates of metastatic and intracranial diagnosis, ECD status at first CNS involvement, systemic therapy, and outcomes were collected. The primary endpoint was PFS1 defined as the time from first CNS radiation to the subsequent documentation of intracranial progression (RANO-BM). OS was defined as time from first CNS radiation and first metastatic disease to date of death or last known alive. ECD status was defined by RECIST1.1 from systemic staging scans within 30 days of first CNS involvement. Results: In this patient cohort of HER2+ BCBMs undergoing CNS radiation at first CNS involvement, >50% of patients had extracranial disease control: no ECD (25%) or stable/responding disease (31%). 52% of patients’ tumors were ER+. Median age was 50 years (range 27 – 75). Most patients (58%) developed first CNS involvement during adjuvant or first/second line metastatic therapy. For first CNS radiation, 49% received SRS and 48% WBRT. All patients with no ECD presented with isolated CNS disease as first metastatic presentation. Median OS in this cohort from initial metastatic disease to death was markedly worse for patients with no ECD (25.3m, 95% CI: 16.8 to 35.3) compared to those with progressive or stable/responding ECD (48.8m, 95% CI: 28.1 to 65; and 52.9 months, 95% CI: 43.7 to 73.3, respectively; p=0.03). Median OS from first CNS involvement to death was not statistically different amongst groups. This analysis did not detect median PFS1 differences based on ECD after first CNS radiation: progressive ECD (6.3m), no ECD (8.7m), or stable/responding ECD (10.6m) (p=0.13), though clinically meaningful differences were observed. Conclusions: Patients with isolated HER2+ BCBM with no ECD at the time of their initial CNS involvement (25% of population) have substantially worse OS compared to patients who present with ECD and develop CNS metastases later in their disease course. This population with isolated CNS disease at metastatic presentation deserves investigation of novel treatment algorithms, including earlier introduction of brain penetrable HER2-targeted agents.

3120 Background: Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) are effective therapies for some patients with both germline and somatic BRCA1/2 mutations (MTs) or with homologous recombination repair deficiency (HRD). We aimed to characterize molecular differences between BRCA1 and BRCA2 MTs and their prognostic and/or predictive impact on PARPi outcomes in various cancer subtypes using real world data (RWD). Methods: Tumor samples obtained from patients with 35 types of cancer were analyzed by whole exome sequencing (WES, Novaseq) at Caris Life Sciences (Phoenix, AZ). High genomic loss of heterozygosity (gLOH-H) was defined as LOH-H in ≥16% of tested loci. MSI/MMR was tested by fragment analysis, IHC, and WES. Overall survival (OS) extracted from insurance claims was calculated from start of treatment or tissue collection until last contact or death using Kaplan-Meier curves. P-values adjusted for multiple comparisons (q-value of < 0.05 was considered to be significant). Results: In total, 17,640 tumors were included, of which 776 (4.3%) had tumor-based BRCA1/2 MTs. BRCA1/2 MTs were most commonly seen in ovarian (N = 221/2187, 10.1%), breast (138/2506, 5.5%), prostate (61/1131, 5.4%), pancreatic (48/1430, 3.4%), and non-small cell lung (100/4046, 2.5%) cancers. BRCA2 MTs were more frequent than BRCA1 except in ovarian cancers. BRCA1 MTs were more common in younger pts (median age, 61 vs 65 years, p