Search

With over 30% of current medications targeting this family of proteins, G-protein–coupled receptors (GPCRs) remain invaluable therapeutic targets. However, due to their unique physicochemical properties, their low abundance, and the lack of highly specific antibodies, GPCRs are still challenging to study in vivo. To overcome these limitations, we combined here transgenic mouse models and proteomic analyses in order to resolve the interactome of the δ-opioid receptor (DOPr) in its native in vivo environment. Given its analgesic properties and milder undesired effects than most clinically prescribed opioids, DOPr is a promising alternative therapeutic target for chronic pain management. However, the molecular and cellular mechanisms regulating its signaling and trafficking remain poorly characterized. We thus performed liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) analyses on brain homogenates of our newly generated knockin mouse expressing a FLAG-tagged version of DOPr and revealed several endogenous DOPr interactors involved in protein folding, trafficking, and signal transduction. The interactions with a few identified partners such as VPS41, ARF6, Rabaptin-5, and Rab10 were validated. We report an approach to characterize in vivo interacting proteins of GPCRs, the largest family of membrane receptors with crucial implications in virtually all physiological systems.

Accumulating evidence indicates that G protein–coupled receptors (GPCRs) interact with Rab GTPases during their intracellular trafficking. How GPCRs recruit and activate the Rabs is unclear. Here, we report that depletion of endogenous L-type prostaglandin D synthase (L-PGDS) in HeLa cells inhibited recycling of the prostaglandin D(2) (PGD(2)) DP1 receptor (DP1) to the cell surface after agonist-induced internalization and that L-PGDS overexpression had the opposite effect. Depletion of endogenous Rab4 prevented l-PGDS–mediated recycling of DP1, and l-PGDS depletion inhibited Rab4-dependent recycling of DP1, indicating that both proteins are mutually involved in this pathway. DP1 stimulation promoted its interaction through its intracellular C terminus with Rab4, which was increased by l-PGDS. Confocal microscopy revealed that DP1 activation induces l-PGDS/Rab4 co-localization. l-PGDS/Rab4 and DP1/Rab4 co-immunoprecipitation levels were increased by DP1 agonist treatment. Pulldown assays with purified GST-l-PGDS and His(6)-Rab4 indicated that both proteins interact directly. l-PGDS interacted preferentially with the inactive, GDP-locked Rab4S22N variant rather than with WT Rab4 or with constitutively active Rab4Q67L proteins. Overexpression and depletion experiments disclosed that l-PGDS partakes in Rab4 activation following DP1 stimulation. Experiments with deletion mutants and synthetic peptides revealed that amino acids 85–92 in l-PGDS are involved in its interaction with Rab4 and in its effect on DP1 recycling. Of note, GTPγS loading and time-resolved FRET assays with purified proteins suggested that l-PGDS enhances GDP-GTP exchange on Rab4. Our results reveal how l-PGDS, which produces the agonist for DP1, regulates DP1 recycling by participating in Rab4 recruitment and activation.

Mechanisms controlling the recycling of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) remain largely unclear. We report that GGA3 (Golgi-associated, γ adaptin ear containing, ADP-ribosylation factor-binding protein 3) regulates the recycling and signaling of the PGD

The delta opioid receptor (DOPr) is known to be mainly expressed in intracellular compartments. It remains unknown why DOPr is barely exported to the cell surface, but it seems that a substantial proportion of the immature receptor is trapped within the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) and the Golgi network. In the present study, we performed LC-MS/MS analysis to identify putative protein partners involved in the retention of DOPr. Analysis of the proteins co-immunoprecipitating with Flag-DOPr in transfected HEK293 cells revealed the presence of numerous subunits of the coatomer protein complex I (COPI), a vesicle-coating complex involved in recycling resident proteins from the Golgi back to the ER. Further analysis of the amino acid sequence of DOPr identified multiple consensus di-lysine and di-arginine motifs within the intracellular segments of DOPr. Using cell-surface ELISA and GST pulldown assays, we showed that DOPr interacts with COPI through its intracellular loops 2 and 3 (ICL2 and ICL3, respectively) and that the mutation of the K164AK166 (ICL2) or K250EK252 (ICL3) putative COPI binding sites increased the cell-surface expression of DOPr in transfected cells. Altogether, our results indicate that COPI is a binding partner of DOPr and provide a putative mechanism to explain why DOPr is highly retained inside the cells.

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) contain highly hydrophobic domains that are subject to aggregation when exposed to the crowded environment of the cytoplasm. Many events can lead to protein aggregation such as mutations, endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress, and misfolding. These processes have been widely known to impact GPCR folding, maturation, and localization. Protein aggregates are transported toward the microtubule-organizing center via dynein to form a large juxta-nuclear structure called the aggresome, and in due course, are then targeted for degradation. Here, we describe a method to study aggregation of GPCRs by fluorescence microscopy.

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) contain highly hydrophobic domains that are subject to aggregation when exposed to the crowded environment of the cytoplasm. Many events can lead to protein aggregation such as mutations, endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress, and misfolding. These processes have been widely known to impact GPCR folding, maturation, and localization. Protein aggregates are transported toward the microtubule-organizing center via dynein to form a large juxta-nuclear structure called the aggresome, and in due course, are then targeted for degradation. Here, we describe a method to study aggregation of GPCRs by fluorescence microscopy.

A direct and functional interaction between a subunit of the CCT/TCP-1 ring complex (TRiC) chaperonin complex and G protein–coupled receptor (GPCRs) is shown. Evidence is provided that distinct nascent GPCRs can undergo alternative folding pathways and that CCT/TRiC is critical in preventing aggregation of some GPCRs and in promoting their proper maturation and expression., Mechanisms that prevent aggregation and promote folding of nascent G protein–coupled receptors (GPCRs) remain poorly understood. We identified chaperonin containing TCP-1 subunit eta (CCT7) as an interacting partner of the β-isoform of thromboxane A2 receptor (TPβ) by yeast two-hybrid screening. CCT7 coimmunoprecipitated with overexpressed TPβ and β2-adrenergic receptor (β2AR) in HEK 293 cells, but also with endogenous β2AR. CCT7 depletion by small interfering RNA reduced total and cell-surface expression of both receptors and caused redistribution of the receptors to juxtanuclear aggresomes, significantly more so for TPβ than β2AR. Interestingly, Hsp90 coimmunoprecipitated with β2AR but virtually not with TPβ, indicating that nascent GPCRs can adopt alternative folding pathways. In vitro pull-down assays showed that both receptors can interact directly with CCT7 through their third intracellular loops and C-termini. We demonstrate that Trp334 in the TPβ C-terminus is critical for the CCT7 interaction and plays an important role in TPβ maturation and cell-surface expression. Of note, introducing a tryptophan in the corresponding position of the TPα isoform confers the CCT7-binding and maturation properties of TPβ. We show that an interaction with a subunit of the CCT/TCP-1 ring complex (TRiC) chaperonin complex is involved in regulating aggregation of nascent GPCRs and in promoting their proper maturation and expression.

Rab4a is a small GTPase associated with endocytic compartments and a key regulator of early endosomes recycling. Gathering evidence indicates that its expression and activation are required for the development of metastases. Rab4a-intrinsic GTPase properties that control its activity, i.e. nucleotide exchange and hydrolysis rates, have not yet been thoroughly studied. The determination of these properties is of the utmost importance to understand its functions and contributions to tumorigenesis. Here, we used the constitutively active (Rab4aQ67L) and dominant negative (Rab4aS22N) mutants to characterize the thermodynamical and structural determinants of the interaction between Rab4a and GTP (GTPγS) as well as GDP. We report the first 1H, 13C, 15N backbone NMR assignments of a Rab GTPase family member with Rab4a in complex with GDP and GTPγS. We also provide a qualitative description of the extent of structural and dynamical changes caused by the Q67L and S22N mutations. Using a real-time NMR approach and the two aforementioned mutants as controls, we evaluated Rab4a intrinsic nucleotide exchange and hydrolysis rates. Compared to most small GTPases such as Ras, a rapid GTP exchange rate along with slow hydrolysis rate were observed. This suggests that, in a cellular context, Rab4a can self-activate and persist in an activated state in absence of regulatory mechanisms. This peculiar profile is uncommon among the Ras superfamily members, making Rab4a an atypical fast-cycling GTPase and may explain, at least in part, how it contributes to metastases.

Mechanisms controlling the recycling of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) remain largely unclear. We report that GGA3 (Golgi-associated, γ adaptin ear containing, ADP-ribosylation factor-binding protein 3) regulates the recycling and signaling of the PGD2 receptor DP1 through a new mechanism. An endogenous interaction between DP1 and GGA3 was detected by co-immunoprecipitation in HeLa cells. The interaction was promoted by DP1 agonist stimulation, which was supported by increased DP1-GGA3 colocalization in confocal microscopy. Pulldown assays showed that GGA3 interacts with the intracellular loop 2 and C-terminus of DP1, whereas the receptor interacts with the VHS domain of GGA3. The Arf-binding deficient GGA3 N194A mutant had the same effect as wild-type GGA3 on DP1 trafficking, suggesting a new mechanism for GGA3 in recycling. Depletion of Rab4 inhibited the GGA3 effect on DP1 recycling, revealing a Rab4-dependent mechanism. Interestingly, depletion of L-PGDS (L-type prostaglandin synthase, the enzyme that produces the agonist for DP1) impaired the ability of GGA3 to mediate DP1 recycling, while GGA3 knockdown prevented L-PGDS from promoting DP1 recycling, indicating that both proteins function interdependently. A novel interaction was observed between co-immunoprecipitated endogenous L-PGDS and GGA3 proteins in HeLa cells, and in vitro using purified recombinant proteins. Redistribution of L-PGDS towards GGA3- and Rab4-positive vesicles was induced by DP1 activation. Silencing of GGA3 inhibited ERK1/2 activation following DP1 stimulation. Altogether, our data reveal a novel function for GGA3, in a newly described association with L-PGDS, in the recycling and signaling of a GPCR, namely DP1.

The GPCR DP1 promotes the activity of L-PGDS, the enzyme that produces the DP1 agonist PGD2, while at the same time L-PGDS promotes the export and activity of DP1 in response to PGD2., Export of newly synthesized G protein–coupled receptors (GPCRs) remains poorly characterized. We show in this paper that lipocalin-type prostaglandin D2 (PGD2) synthase (L-PGDS) interacts intracellularly with the GPCR DP1 in an agonist-independent manner. L-PGDS promotes cell surface expression of DP1, but not of other GPCRs, in HEK293 and HeLa cells, independent of L-PGDS enzyme activity. In addition, formation of a DP1–Hsp90 complex necessary for DP1 export to the cell surface is dependent on the interaction between L-PGDS and the C-terminal MEEVD residues of Hsp90. Surprisingly, PGD2 synthesis by L-PGDS is promoted by coexpression of DP1, suggesting a possible intracrine/autocrine signaling mechanism. In this regard, L-PGDS increases the formation of a DP1–ERK1/2 complex and increases DP1-mediated ERK1/2 signaling. Our findings define a novel cooperative mechanism in which a GPCR (DP1) promotes the activity of the enzyme (L-PGDS) that produces its agonist (PGD2) and in which this enzyme in turn acts as a cofactor (of Hsp90) to promote export and agonist-dependent activity of the receptor.

Previous reports by us and others demonstrated that G protein-coupled receptors interact functionally with Rab GTPases. Here, we show that the β2-adrenergic receptor (β2AR) interacts with the Rab geranylgeranyltransferase α-subunit (RGGTA). Confocal microscopy showed that β2AR co-localizes with RGGTA in intracellular compartments and at the plasma membrane. Site-directed mutagenesis revealed that RGGTA binds to the L339L340 motif in the β2AR C terminus known to be involved in the transport of the receptor from the endoplasmic reticulum to the cell surface. Modulation of the cellular levels of RGGTA protein by overexpression or siRNA-mediated knockdown of the endogenous protein demonstrated that RGGTA has a positive role in the maturation and anterograde trafficking of the β2AR, which requires the interaction of RGGTA with the β2AR L339L340 motif. Furthermore, the β2AR modulates the geranylgeranylation of Rab6a, Rab8a, and Rab11a, but not of other Rab proteins tested in this study. Regulation of Rab geranylgeranylation by the β2AR was dependent on the RGGTA-interacting L339L340 motif. Interestingly, a RGGTA-Y107F mutant was unable to regulate Rab geranylgeranylation but still promoted β2AR maturation, suggesting that RGGTA may have functions independent of Rab geranylgeranylation. We demonstrate for the first time an interaction between a transmembrane receptor and RGGTA which regulates the maturation and anterograde transport of the receptor, as well as geranylgeranylation of Rab GTPases.

We and others have shown that trafficking of G protein-coupled receptors is regulated by Rab GTPases. Cargo-mediated regulation of vesicular transport has received great attention lately. Rab GTPases, forming the largest branch of the Ras GTPase superfamily, regulate almost every step of vesicle-mediated trafficking. Rab GTPases are well-recognized targets of human diseases but their regulation and the mechanisms connecting them to cargo proteins are still poorly understood. Herein, we show by overexpression/depletion studies that HACE1, a HECT domain-containing ubiquitin ligase, promotes the recycling of the β2-adrenergic receptor (β2AR), a prototypical G protein-coupled receptor, through a Rab11a-dependent mechanism. Interestingly, the β2AR in conjunction with HACE1 triggered ubiquitination of Rab11a, as observed by Western blot analysis. LC-MS/MS experiments determined that Rab11a is ubiquitnatied on Lys145. A Rab11a-K145R mutant failed to undergo β2AR/HACE1-induced ubiquitination and inhibited the HACE1-mediated recycling of the β2AR. Rab11a, but not Rab11a-K145R, was activated by β2AR/HACE1 indicating that ubiquitination of Lys145 is involved in Rab11a activation. β2AR/HACE1 co-expression also potentiated ubiquitination of Rab6a and Rab8a, but not of other Rab GTPases that were tested. We report a novel regulatory mechanism of Rab GTPases by their ubiquitination with associated functional effects demonstrated on Rab11a. This partakes into a new pathway whereby a cargo protein, like a G protein-coupled receptor, can regulate its own trafficking by inducing the ubiquitination and activation of a Rab GTPase.

Thromboxane A(2) (TXA(2)) is an important lipid mediator whose function in apoptosis is the subject of conflicting reports. Here, a yeast two-hybrid screen for proteins that interact with the C-terminus of the TXA(2) receptor (TP) identified Siva1 as a new TP-interacting protein. Contradictory evidence suggests pro- and anti-apoptotic roles for Siva1. We show that a cisplatin treatment induces TXA(2) synthesis in HeLa cells. We demonstrate that endogenous TP stimulation promotes cisplatin-induced apoptosis of HeLa cells and that such modulation requires the expression of Siva1, as evidenced by inhibiting its endogenous expression using siRNAs. We reveal that, upon stimulation of TP, degradation of Siva1 is impeded, resulting in an accumulation of the protein, which translocates from the nucleus to the cytosol. Translocation of Siva1 correlates with its reduced interaction with Mdm2 (an inhibitor of p53 signalling), as well as with its increased interaction with TRAF2 and XIAP (known to enhance pro-apoptotic signalling). Our data provide a model that reconciles the pro- and anti-apoptotic roles that were reported for Siva1 and identify a new mechanism for promoting apoptosis by G protein-coupled receptors. Our findings may have implications in the use of cyclo-oxygenase inhibitors during cisplatin chemotherapy and might provide a target to reduce cisplatin toxicity on non-cancerous tissues.