Search

One of the most fundamental questions in ecology is how many species inhabit the Earth. However, due to massive logistical and financial challenges and taxonomic difficulties connected to the species concept definition, the global numbers of species, including those of important and well-studied life forms such as trees, still remain largely unknown. Here, based on global ground-sourced data, we estimate the total tree species richness at global, continental, and biome levels. Our results indicate that there are ∼73,000 tree species globally, among which ∼9,000 tree species are yet to be discovered. Roughly 40% of undiscovered tree species are in South America. Moreover, almost one-third of all tree species to be discovered may be rare, with very low populations and limited spatial distribution (likely in remote tropical lowlands and mountains). These findings highlight the vulnerability of global forest biodiversity to anthropogenic changes in land use and climate, which disproportionately threaten rare species and thus, global tree richness., Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 119 (6), ISSN:0027-8424, ISSN:1091-6490

12 pages; International audience; Complete or even sub-complete inventories of biodiversity often remain well out of reach, especially when dealing with speciose taxonomic groups, such as insects in general and butterfly fauna in particular. Moreover, it is even uncertain that similar completeness levels may be reached among taxonomic subsets within a same surveyed taxonomic group. For example, one can wonder whether sampling butterfly fauna according to the commonly implemented " Pollard walk " consistently ensure a similar recording efficiency (i.e. similar sampling completeness) according to the different butterfly families. To address this issue and quantify the possible unevenness of sampling completeness between five main butterfly families, we consider a " Pollard walk " butterfly survey of tropical butterfly fauna, carried out along Sankosh River (Bhutan) by Arun P. Singh. Reasonably accurate estimates of the true total species richness and the corresponding sampling completeness were derived, for each butterfly family, by implementing the recently developed procedure of " least-biased " extrapolation of the species accumulation curve. Whereby, a reliable evaluation of the level of sampling completeness is obtained for each butterfly family. For the inventory under consideration, a significant scatter of sampling completeness levels between the five families is highlighted: sampling completeness levels range from 65% for Lycaenidae to quasi exhaustivity for Papilionidae, with intermediate levels for the other three families. 2 These findings revealed that " Pollard walk " survey may lead to appreciable differences of sampling completeness level among the different butterfly families. Besides, this study provides a reliable estimate of the total species richness of butterfly fauna in the surveyed ecosystem, amounting to no less than 280 species concentrated in a rather reduced area along Sankosh River.

Fraser et al. (Reports, 17 July 2015, p. 302) report a unimodal relationship between productivity and species richness at regional and global scales, which they contrast with the results of Adler et al. (Reports, 23 September 2011, p. 1750). However, both data sets, when analyzed correctly, show clearly and consistently that productivity is a poor predictor of local species richness. EEA Santa Cruz Fil: Tredennick, Andrew T. Utah State University. Department of Wildland Resources and the Ecology Center; Estados Unidos Fil: Adler, Peter B. Utah State University. Department of Wildland Resources and the Ecology Center; Estados Unidos Fil: Grace, James B. U.S. Geological Survey, Wetland and Aquatic Research Center; Estados Unidos Fil: Harpole, W. Stanley. Helmholtz Center for Environmental Research – UFZ. Department of Physiological Diversity; Alemania Fil: Borer, Elizabeth T. University of Minnesota. Department of Ecology, Evolution, and Behavior; Estados Unidos Fil: Seabloom, Eric W. University of Minnesota. Department of Ecology, Evolution, and Behavior; Estados Unidos Fil: Anderson, T. Michael. Wake Forest University. Department of Biology; Estados Unidos Fil: Bakker, Jonathan D. University of Washington. School of Environmental and Forest Sciences; Estados Unidos Fil: Biederman, Lori A. lowa State University Ecology. Evolution and Organismal Biology; Estados Unidos Fil: Brown, Cynthia S. Colorado State University. Department of Bioagricultural Sciences and Pest Management; Estados Unidos Fil: Buckley, Yvonne M. University of Dublin. School of Natural Sciences. Trinity College Dublin. Zoology; Irlanda. Fil: Chu, Chengjin. Sun Yat-sen University. School of Life Sciences; China. Fil: Collins, Scott L. University of New Mexico. Department of Biology; Estados Unidos Fil: Crawley, Michael J. Imperial College London. Department of Biology; Reino Unido Fil: Fay, Philip A. USDA-ARS. Grassland, Soil, and Water Research Laboratory; Estados Unidos Fil: Firn, Jennifer. Queensland University of Technology. School of Earth, Environmental and Biological Sciences; Australia. Fil: Gruner, Daniel S. University of Maryland. Department of Entomology. Plant Sciences; Estados Unidos Fil: Hagenah, Nicole. University of KwaZulu-Natal. School of Life Sciences; Sudáfrica Fil: Hautier, Yann. Utrecht University. Department of Biology, Ecology and Biodiversity group; Países Bajos Fil: Hector, Andy. University of Oxford. Department of Plant Sciences; Reino Unido Fil: Hillebrand, Helmut. Carl-von-Ossietzky University. Institute for Chemistry and Biology of the Marine Environment; Alemania Fil: Kirkman, Kevin. University of KwaZulu-Natal. School of Life Sciences; Sudáfrica Fil: Knops, Johannes M. H. University of Nebraska. School of Biological Sciences; Estados Unidos Fil: Laungani, Ramesh. Doane College. Biology Department; Estados Unidos Fil: Lind, Eric M. University of Minnesota. Department of Ecology, Evolution and Behavior; Estados Unidos. Fil: MacDougall, Andrew S. University of Guelph. Department of Integrative Biology; Canadá. Fil: McCulley, Rebecca L. University of Kentucky. Department of Plant and Soil Science; Estados Unidos Fil: Mitchell, Charles E. University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. Department of Biology; Estados Unidos Fil: Moore, Joslin L. Monash University. School of Biological Sciences; Australia. Fil: Morgan, John W. La Trobe University. Department of Ecology, Environment and Evolution; Australia. Fil: Orrock, John L. University of Wisconsin. Department of Zoology; Estados Unidos Fil: Peri, Pablo Luis. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Santa Cruz; Argentina. Fil: Peri, Pablo Luis. Universidad Nacional de la Patagonia Austral; Argentina. Fil: Peri, Pablo Luis. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Fil: Prober, Suzanne M. Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation Land and Water; Australia. Fil: Risch, Anita C. Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research. Community Ecology; Suiza Fil: Schütz, Martin. Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research. Community Ecology; Suiza Fil: Speziale, Karina L. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Instituto de Investigaciones en Biodiversidad y Medioambiente (INIBIOMA). Universidad Nacional del Comahue; Argentina. Fil: Standish, Rachel J. Murdoch University. School of Veterinary and Life Sciences; Australia. Fil: Sullivan, Lauren L. University of Minnesota. Department of Ecology, Evolution and Behavior; Estados Unidos Fil: Wardle, Glenda M. University of Sydney. School of Biological Sciences; Australia. Fil: Williams, Ryan J. Iowa State University. Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering; Estados Unidos Fil: Yang, Louie H. University of California. Department of Entomology and Nematology; Estados Unidos

The riparian forests are hotspots of biodiversity and serve important roles in maintainingthe water quality. The study and understanding of this ecosystem is basic to know how theriparian zones respond to the threat and the changes produced by the urbanization. Theobjective of this pilot study was to know the species richness and check the status of theriparian vegetation along two different rivers in Halmstad, Nissan and Fylleån. The studywas focus on the status of trees at both rivers to see if the proximity of the city has anyimpact on the biodiversity. In total 9 different species were found, nevertheless only 3 ofthese species were founded on both localizations: Quercus robur, Betula pendula and Pinussylvestris. The Shannon Index showed a higher biodiversity on Nissan riparian zones, whichis the river that present the urban component. The urban area is the one that presentshigher level of biodiversity, tree species and number of individuals but there are notenough to be in a good standard. The result just show that the urban area is in a bettercondition that the natural one. The institutional efforts should be focusing on preserveboth environments with special attention to the natural environment.