Search

PurposeOnline Adaptive Radiation Therapy(oART) follows a different treatment paradigm than conventional radiotherapy and, because of this, the resources, implementation, and workflows needed are unique. The purpose of this report is to outline our institution’s experience establishing, organizing, and implementing an oART program using the Ethos therapy system.MethodsWe include resources used; operational models utilized, program creation timelines, and our institutional experiences with implementation and operation of an oART program. Additionally, we provide a detailed summary of our first year’s clinical experience where we delivered over 1000 daily adaptive fractions. For all treatments, the different stages of online adaption, primary patient set-up, initial kV-CBCT acquisition, contouring review and edit of influencer structures, target review and edits, plan evaluation and selection, Mobius3D 2ndcheck and adaptive QA, 2ndkV-CBCT for positional verification, treatment delivery, and patient leaving the room, were analyzed.ResultsWe retrospectively analyzed data from ninety-seven patients treated from August 2021-August 2022. 1677 individual fractions were treated and analyzed, 632(38%) were non-adaptive and 1045(62%) were adaptive. 74 of the 97 patients (76%) were treated with standard fractionation and 23 (24%) received stereotactic treatments. For the adaptive treatments, the generated adaptive plan was selected in 92% of treatments. On average(±std), adaptive sessions took 34.52±11.42 minutes from start to finish. The entire adaptive process (from start of contour generation to verification CBCT), performed by the physicist (and physician on select days), was 19.84±8.21 minutes.ConclusionWe present our institution’s experience commissioning an oART program using the Ethos therapy system. It took us 12 months from project inception to treatment of our first patient and 12 months to treat 1000 adaptive fractions. Retrospective analysis of delivered fractions showed that average overall treatment time was approximately 35 minutes and average time for the adaptive component of treatment was approximately 20 minutes.

The purpose of this paper is to summarize treatment guidelines for the performance of single isocenter LINAC radiosurgery of multiple brain metastases developed and used by 3 experienced centers. This article is not meant to provide consensus guidelines. Rather, this is a practical, "how we do it" reference without substantial discussion. To serve as a treatment reference, the great majority of the information is presented in topic-specific tables.

The clinical introduction of dedicated treatment units for online adaptive radiation therapy (OART) has led to widespread adoption of daily adaptive radiotherapy. OART allows for rapid generation of treatment plans using daily patient anatomy, potentially leading to reduction of treatment margins and increased normal tissue sparing. However, the OART workflow does not allow for measurement of patient-specific quality assurance (PSQA) during treatment delivery sessions and instead relies on secondary dose calculations for verification of adapted plans. It remains unknown if independent dose verification is a sufficient surrogate for PSQA measurements.To evaluate the plan quality of previously treated adaptive plans through multiple standard PSQA measurements.This IRB-approved retrospective study included sixteen patients previously treated with OART at our institution. PSQA measurements were performed for each patient's scheduled and adaptive plans: five adaptive plans were randomly selected to perform ion chamber measurements and two adaptive plans were randomly selected for ArcCHECK measurements. The same ArcCHECK 3D dose distribution was also sent to Mobius3D to evaluate the second-check dosimetry system.All (n = 96) ion chamber measurements agreed with the planned dose within 3% with a mean of 1.4% (± 0.7%). All (n = 48) plans passed ArcCHECK measurements using a 95% gamma passing threshold and 3%/2 mm criteria with a mean of 99.1% (± 0.7%). All (n = 48) plans passed Mobius3D second-check performed with 95% gamma passing threshold and 5%/3 mm criteria with a mean of 99.0% (± 0.2%).Plan measurement for PSQA may not be necessary for every online-adaptive treatment verification. We recommend the establishment of a periodic PSQA check to better understand trends in passing rates for delivered adaptive treatments.

To validate surface imaging (SI)-reported offsets using a six degree-of-freedom couch and an anthropomorphic phantom for commissioning and routine quality assurance of an SI system used for stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS).An anthropomorphic phantom with a radiopaque ball bearing (BB) placed either anterior, midline, or posterior, was tracked with SI with a typical SRS region of interest. Couch motion in all six degrees of freedom was programmed and delivered on a linac. SI system logs were synchronized with linac trajectory logs. Ten random couch positions were selected at couch 0°, 45°, 90°, 270°, 315° with megavolt (MV) images taken to account for couch walkout. The SI residual error (ε), the difference between SI reported offset and MV or trajectory log position, was calculated. Residual errors were measured with and without one SI pod blocked.The median [range] of magnitude of translational ε was 0.13 [0.07, 0.21], 0.16 [0.11, 0.26], 0.61 [0.50, 0.68], 0.49 [0.42, 0.55], 0.55 [0.38, 0.72] mm for couch rotations of 0°, 45°, 90°, 270°, 315°, respectively, for the midline BB and no pod blocked. The range of all translational ε from all couch angles (with and without pod block) at different BB positions is [0.05, 0.96] mm. The absolute range of difference when changing BB position when no pod is blocked in median translational ε is [0.01, 0.40] mm with the maximum at BB posterior. The absolute range of difference when not changing BB positions with and without pod block in median translational ε is [0.01, 0.37] mm with the maximum at BB posterior and couch 315°.SI system and linac trajectory log analysis can be used to assess SI system performance with automated couch motion to validate SI accuracy.

Properly planned single isocenter volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) radiosurgery plans exhibit high quality and efficiency. We report here the largest clinical experience to date, to our knowledge, comparing manual planning with a new automated platform designed to standardize and simplify radiosurgery planning and delivery processes.We treated 693 patients with single isocenter VMAT radiosurgical plans generated by either our conventional manual (mVMAT) or a recently implemented automated (HyperArcThe median Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) conformity index was 1.14 and was not different between the 2 techniques. The median Paddick gradient index was 5.42 for HyperArc versus 7.09 for mVMAT (P.001). The median mean brain doses were 4.6% and 5.1% for HyperArc and mVMAT, respectively (P = .04). The PSQA for both techniques met clinical criteria, but 97% of the HyperArc plans satisfied the gamma tolerance limit recommended by the American Association of Physicists in Medicine Task Group No. 218, compared with 94% of the mVMAT plans (P = .02). The median treatment-planning times were not significantly different. The median treatment times were 10.5 and 11.4 minutes for HyperArc and mVMAT, respectively (P.001). The Kaplan-Meier estimate of local control was 90.1% at 1 year.HyperArc produces high-quality radiosurgical plans that are at least as good as mVMAT plans created by an expert manual planner with easier planning and more efficient delivery workflow. A less experienced planner can produce very high-quality radiosurgical plans even for patients with more than 10 targets. The use of a single-isocenter technique for multiple targets with no PTV margin did not compromise clinical outcomes, and 1-year local control for treated targets remained congruent with historical series.

Purpose For stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), accurate evaluation of dose-volume metrics for small structures is necessary. The purpose of this study was to compare the DVH metric capabilities of five commercially available SRS DVH analysis tools (Eclipse, Elements, Raystation, MIM, and Velocity). Methods DICOM RTdose and RTstructure set files created using MATLAB were imported and evaluated in each of the tools. Each structure set consisted of 50 randomly placed spherical targets. The dose distributions were created on a 1-mm grid using an analytic model such that the dose-volume metrics of the spheres were known. Structure sets were created for 3, 5, 7, 10, 15, and 20 mm diameter spheres. The reported structure volume, V100% [cc], and V50% [cc], and the RTOG conformity index and Paddick Gradient Index, were compared with the analytical values. Results The average difference and range across all evaluated target sizes for the reported structure volume was - 4.73%[-33.2,0.2], 0.11%[-10.9, 9.5], -0.39%[-12.1, 7.0], -2.24%[-21.0, 1.3], and 1.15%[-15.1,0.8], for TPS-A through TPS-E, respectively. The average difference and range for the V100%[cc] (V20Gy[cc]) was - 0.4[-24.5,9.8], -2.73[-23.6, 1.1], -3.01[-23.6, 0.6], -3.79[-27.3, 1.3], and 0.26[-6.1,2.6] for TPS-A through TPS-E, respectively. For V50%[cc](V10Gy[cc]) in TPS-A through TPS-E the average and ranger were - 0.05[-0.8,0.4], -0.18[-1.2, 0.5], -0.44[-1.4, 0.3], -0.26[-1.8, 2.6], and 0.09[-1.4,2.7]. Conclusion This study expanded on the previously published literature to quantitatively compare the DVH analysis capabilities of software commonly used for SRS plan evaluation and provides freely available and downloadable analytically derived set of ground truth DICOM dose and structure files for the use of radiotherapy clinics. The differences between systems highlight the need for standardization and/or transparency between systems, especially when evaluating plan quality for multi-institutional clinical trials.

Purpose To report on the use of surface guided imaging during frameless intracranial stereotactic radiotherapy with automated delivery via HyperArcTM (Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA). Methods All patients received intracranial radiotherapy with HyperArcTM and were monitored for intrafraction motion by the AlignRT® (VisionRT, London, UK) surface imaging (SI) system. Immobilization was with the EncompassTM (Qfix, Avondale, PA) aquaplast mask device. AlignRT® log files were correlated with trajectory log files to correlate treatment parameters with SI reported offsets. SI reported offsets were correlated with gantry angle and analyzed for performance issues at non‐zero couch angles and during camera‐pod blockage during gantry motion. Demographics in the treatment management system were used to identify race and determine if differences in SI reported offsets are due to skin tone settings. Results A total of 981 fractions were monitored over 14 months and 819 were analyzed. The median AlignRT® reported motion from beginning to the end of treatment was 0.24 mm. The median offset before beam on at non‐zero couch angles was 0.55 mm. During gantry motion when camera pods are blocked, the median magnitude was below 1 mm. Median magnitude of offsets at non‐zero couch angles was not found to be significantly different for patients stratified by race. Conclusions Surface image guidance is a viable alternative to scheduled mid‐treatment imaging for monitoring intrafraction motion during stereotactic radiosurgery with automated delivery.

Purpose To create automated tools within the treatment planning system (TPS) that eliminate the common error pathway of providing incorrect shift instructions to therapists. Materials/Methods Two scripts were created within the TPS using the Eclipse API (Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA). One script detects whether or not the user origin has been placed correctly at the intersection of the simulation markers while the other calculates a shift instruction sheet that can be printed for treatment. Results Analysis of our RO‐ILS database identified eight errors caused by improper setting of the user origin in the treatment planning system. The user origin script flagged all of the treatment plans for markers inconsistent with user origin. Automated calculation of shifts eliminated the error pathway of miscalculating or transcribing shift values. Conclusion Automation can eliminate the common error pathway of providing the wrong shifts to therapists. The scripts have been made available as open‐source software for implementation at other radiotherapy clinics.

The Calypso Beacon transponder has been modified by the addition of a nitinol anchor feature to allow for positional stability when implanted bronchoscopically into the lung. The purpose of this study was to confirm the feasibility and safety of anchored transponder placement and feasibility of lung target localization and tracking.This study enrolled patients with histologically confirmed cancer in the lung (primary or metastatic) who were scheduled to receive external beam radiation therapy. Three anchored transponders were implanted via flexible bronchoscopy into small (approximately 2- to 2.5-mm diameter) airways. Patient alignment at each radiation fraction was performed with the Calypso system, and anchored transponder position was tracked during radiation delivery. The primary endpoint was defined as the ability to localize at least 85% of the patients during the first week of treatment. Four follow-up visits were specified including a posttreatment assessment and every 3 months up to 1 year.A total of 69 patients underwent anchored transponder placement, and all 207 implanted anchored transponders were visible on the treatment-planning simulation computed tomography scan. Sixty-seven patients underwent radiation therapy, and localization was successful in 66 cases (98.5%). With 1 failure in 67 cases, the P value for rejecting the null hypothesis was.001 and the primary objective of the study met. Five adverse events in 5 patients were potentially attributed to the study device or implantation procedure, consisting of pneumonia (2 cases), pleural abscess (1 case), and pneumothorax (2 cases). Two serious events (cardiac arrest and acute hypotension) were attributed to anesthesia during the implantation procedure.This study strongly supports that anchored transponders are safe, positionally stable, and useful for lung tumor localization and monitoring.

We present a framework for collecting data which elucidates detailed clinical flow timelines for different treatment sites, modalities, planners, and physicians in radiotherapy treatments. A web based tool, the Whiteboard, was developed which allows communication between the physicians and staff about the current state of the radiotherapy treatment plan and provides detailed time data for each stage of the patient's journey from simulation to treatment. Detailed timestamped data was collected over a period of 6 years which included 22 discrete steps of the treatment planning process. Whiteboard data was combined with data in the treatment planning database Aria (Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA) using the Eclipse Scripting API to include treatment plan information. Over 6 years, 110,477 patient statuses were time-logged for 9683 courses of treatment using our Whiteboard software, which allowed determination of patient volumes per individual and the time to perform planning tasks. The mean planning volume per dosimetrist was 375.8 ± 142.4 plans and 71.03 ± 27.10 plan revisions per year. The mean planning volume per physician was 218.9 ± 110.8 plan approvals with 41.55 ± 43.73 plan revisions per year. Physician contour time was a mean of 79.59 ± 84.61 hours, but varied greatly by diagnosis category and physician. The longest median modality planning time of 119.6 hours was for the IMRT plans with 8 or more fields. The shortest median times were 48.25, 49.53, and 50.98 hours for plans with 5, 4, and 3 fields, respectively. We demonstrated a framework that could help facilities in staff planning and aid in workload distribution, and could be used to improve understanding of radiotherapy timelines for patients, payers, and other institutions involved in radiotherapy processes.

Purpose: Surgery is often used for large or symptomatic brain metastases but is associated with risk of developing leptomeningeal dissemination. Emerging data suggest that fractionated stereotactic radiation therapy (FSRT) is an effective management strategy in large brain metastases. We sought to retrospectively compare leptomeningeal disease (LMD) and local control (LC) rates for patients treated with surgical resection followed by radiosurgery (S + SRS) versus FSRT alone. Methods and Materials: We identified all patients with a brain metastasis ≥3 cm in diameter treated from 2004 to 2017 with S + SRS or FSRT alone (25 or 30 Gy in 5 fractions) who had follow-up imaging. LMD was defined as focal or diffuse leptomeningeal enhancement that was >5 mm from the index metastasis. Categorical baseline characteristics were compared with the χ2 test. LMD and LC rates were evaluated by the Kaplan-Meier (KM) method, with the log-rank test used to compare subgroups. Results: A total of 125 patients were identified, including 82 and 43 in the S + SRS and FSRT alone groups, respectively. Median pretreatment Graded Prognostic Assessment in the S + SRS and FSRT groups was 2.5 and 1.5, respectively (P

A multileaf collimator (MLC), virtual-cone treatment technique has been commissioned for trigeminal neuralgia (TGN) at Tri-Cities Cancer Center (TCCC). This novel technique was initially developed at the University of Alabama in Birmingham (UAB); it is designed to produce a spherical dose profile similar to a fixed, 5-mm conical collimator distribution. Treatment is delivered with a 10-MV flattening-filter-free (FFF) beam using a high-definition MLC on a Varian Edge linear accelerator. Absolute dose output and profile measurements were performed in a 20 × 20 × 14 cm

Purpose: Interest and application of stereotactic radiosurgery for multiple brain metastases continue to increase. Various planning systems are available for linear accelerator (linac)–based single-isocenter multiple metastasis radiosurgery. Two of the most advanced systems are BrainLAB Multiple Metastases Elements (MME), a dynamic conformal arc (DCA) approach, and Varian RapidArc (RA), a volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) approach. In this work, we systematically compared plan quality between the 2 techniques. Methods and Materials: Thirty patients with 4 to 10 metastases (217 total; median 7.5; Vmin = 0.014 cm3; Vmax = 17.73 cm3) were planned with both Varian RA and MME at 2 different institutions with extensive experience in each respective technique. All plans had a single isocenter and used Varian linac equipped with high-definition multileaf collimator. RA plans used 2 to 4 noncoplanar VMAT arcs with 10 MV flattening filter-free beam. MME plans used 4 to 9 noncoplanar DCAs and 6 MV flattening filter-free beam, (minimum planning target volume [PTVmin] = 0.49 cm3; PTVmax = 27.32 cm3; PTVmedian = 7.05 cm3). Prescriptions were 14 to 24 Gy in a single fraction. Target coverage goal was 99% of volume receiving prescription dose (D99% ≥ 100%). Plans were evaluated by Radiation Therapy Oncology Group/Paddick conformity index (CI) score, 12 Gy volume (V12Gy), V8Gy, V5Gy, mean brain dose (Dmean), and beam-on time. Results: Conformity was favorable among RA plans (median: MME CIRTOG = 1.38; RA CIRTOG = 1.21; P < .0001). V12Gy and V8Gy were lower for RA plans (median: MME V12 = 23.7 cm3; RA V12 = 19.2 cm3; P = .0001; median: MME V8Gy = 53.6 cm3; RA V8Gy = 44.1 cm3; P = .024). V5Gy was lower for MME plans (median: MME V5Gy = 141.4 cm3; RA V5Gy = 142.8 cm3; P = .009). Mean brain was lower for MME plans (median: MME Dmean = 2.57 Gy; RA Dmean = 2.76 Gy; P < .0001). Conclusions: For linac-based multiple metastasis stereotactic radiosurgery, RapidArc VMAT facilitates favorable conformity and V12Gy/V8Gy volume compared with the MME DCA plan. MME planning facilitates reduced dose spill at levels ≤V5Gy.

Background Vaginal bleeding (VB) is common in women with gynecologic (GYN) malignancies. Radiation therapy (RT) is used for the definitive treatment of GYN cancers and palliation of bleeding. The historical dogma is that high dose-per-fraction radiation leads to more rapid bleeding cessation, yet there is scant data supporting this claim. We sought to examine the effect of RT fraction size on VB via retrospective analysis of patients receiving hypofractionated radiation (HFRT) compared to conventionally fractionated radiation (CFRT) for control of bleeding secondary to GYN malignancies. Methods We identified patients receiving external beam RT for continuous VB from GYN malignancy treated in our department from 2012 to 2020. RT was classified as HFRT (> 2.0 Gy/fx) or CFRT (1.8–2.0 Gy/fx). Demographic information, disease characteristics, and treatment details were collected. The primary endpoint was days from RT initiation until bleeding resolution. Characteristics between groups were compared via Fisher’s exact test. Time to bleeding cessation was assessed via Kaplan–Meier and log-rank test. Univariable and multivariable Cox-proportional hazards were used to identify factors associated with bleeding cessation. Results We identified 43 patients meeting inclusion criteria with 26 and 17 patients receiving CFRT and HFRT, respectively. Comparison of baseline characteristics revealed patients receiving HFRT were older (p = 0.001), more likely to be post-menopausal (p = 0.002), and less likely to receive concurrent chemotherapy (p = 0.004). Time to bleeding cessation was significantly shorter for patients receiving HFRT (log-rank p p = 0.008). Conclusions Patients with continuous VB from GYN tumors receiving HFRT experienced more rapid bleeding cessation than those receiving CFRT. For patients with severe VB, initiation of HFRT to control malignancy related bleeding quickly may be warranted.

Purpose To evaluate a two‐dimensional diode array for patient‐specific quality assurance of VMAT stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) plans. Methods The diode array, an SRS MapCHECK (SRSMC), was composed of a 77 mm ×77 mm face‐centered array having a spacing of 2.47 mm. Sixty SRS plans were selected from our clinical database, 30 for treatment of a single target and 30 for multiple targets. The target sizes ranged from 2.4 mm to 44.7 mm equivalent diameter (median 8.7 mm). The plans were delivered to the diode array. For multiple target plans, two measurements were obtained at two locations, one corresponding to the largest target and the other to the smallest target. Gamma using a 3%/1 mm criteria and the dose to the center diode were compared with radiochromic film (RCF). Dose to selected regions of the detector electronics was calculated. Results The mean difference between the center diode and RCF was −1.2%. For a threshold of at least 95% of detectors/pixels having gamma

Purpose: The aim of this study was to report the treatment planning feasibility of dose escalation to suspicious lymph nodes (LNs) for a series of men who underwent pretreatment [18F]fluciclovine positron emission tomography (PET)/magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Methods and Materials: Cases of men with prostate cancer who enrolled in a clinical trial of pretreatment [18F]fluciclovine PET who had suspicious LNs were selected. Pelvic LNs

Purpose To evaluate a scintillator detector for patient‐specific quality assurance of VMAT radiosurgery plans. Methods The detector was comprised of a 1 mm diameter, 1 mm high scintillator coupled to an acrylic optical fiber. Sixty VMAT SRS plans for treatment of single targets having sizes ranging from 3 mm to 30.2 mm equivalent diameter (median 16.3 mm) were selected. The plans were delivered to a 20 cm × 20 cm x 15 cm water equivalent plastic phantom having either the scintillator detector or radiochromic film at the center. Calibration films were obtained for each measurement session. The films were scanned and converted to dose using a 3‐channel technique. Results The mean difference between scintillator and film was ‒0.45% (95% confidence interval ‒0.1% to 0.8%). For target equivalent diameter smaller than the median, the mean difference was 1.1% (95% confidence interval 0.5% to 1.7%). For targets larger than the median, the mean difference was ‒0.2% (95% confidence interval ‒0.7% to 0.1%). Conclusions The scintillator detector response is independent of target size for targets as small as 3 mm and is well‐suited for patient‐specific quality assurance of VMAT SRS plans. Further work is needed to evaluate the accuracy for VMAT plans that treat multiple targets using a single isocenter.

Purpose To evaluate the accuracy of monitoring intrafraction motion during stereotactic radiotherapy with the optical surface monitoring system. Prior studies showing a false increase in the magnitude of translational offsets at non‐coplanar couch positions prompted the vendor to implement software changes. This study evaluated two software improvements intended to address false offsets. Methods The vendor implemented two software improvements: a volumetric (ACO) rather than planar calibration and, approximately 6 months later, an improved calibration workflow (CIB) designed to better compensate for thermal drift. Offsets relative to the reference position, obtained at table angle 0 following image‐guided setup, were recorded before beam‐on at each table position and at the end of treatment the table returned to 0° for patients receiving SRT. Results Prior to ACO, between ACO and CIB, and after CIB, 223, 155, and 436 fractions were observed respectively. The median magnitude of translational offsets at the end of treatment was similar for all three intervals: 0.29, 0.33, and 0.27 mm. Prior to ACO, the offset magnitude for non‐zero table positions had a median of 0.79 mm and was found to increase with increasing distance from isocenter to the anterior patient surface. After ACO, the median magnitude was 0.74 mm, but the dependence on surface‐to‐isocenter distance was eliminated. After CIB, the median magnitude for non‐zero table positions was reduced to 0.57 mm. Conclusion Ongoing improvements in software and calibration procedures have decreased reporting of false offsets at non‐zero table angles. However, the median magnitude for non‐zero table angles is larger than that observed at the end of treatment, indicating that accuracy remains better when the table is not rotated.

Purpose To measure dosimetric and spatial accuracy of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) delivered to targets as small as the trigeminal nerve (TN) using a standard external beam treatment planning system (TPS) and multileaf collimator‐(MLC) equipped linear accelerator without cones or other special attachments or modifications. Methods Dosimetric performance was assessed by comparing computed dose distributions to film measurements. Comparisons included the γ‐index, beam profiles, isodose lines, maximum dose, and spatial accuracy. Initially, single static 360° arcs of MLC‐shaped fields ranging from 1.6 × 5 to 30 × 30 mm2 were planned and delivered to an in‐house built block phantom having approximate dimensions of a human head. The phantom was equipped with markings that allowed accurate setup using planar kV images. Couch walkout during multiple‐arc treatments was investigated by tracking a ball pointer, initially positioned at cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) isocenter, as the couch was rotated. Tracks were mapped with no load and a 90 kg stack of plastic plates simulating patient treatment. The dosimetric effect of walkout was assessed computationally by comparing test plans that corrected for walkout to plans that neglected walkout. The plans involved nine 160° arcs of 2.4 × 5 mm2 fields applied at six different couch angles. For end‐to‐end tests that included CT simulation, target contouring, planning, and delivery, a cylindrical phantom mimicking a 3 mm lesion was constructed and irradiated with the nine‐arc regimen. The phantom, lacking markings as setup aids was positioned under CBCT guidance by registering its surface and internal structures with CTs from simulation. Radiochromic film passing through the target center was inserted parallel to the coronal and the sagittal plane for assessment of spatial and dosimetric accuracy. Results In the single‐arc block phantom tests computed maximum doses of all field sizes agreed with measurements within 2.4 ± 2.0%. Profile widths at 50% maximum agreed within 0.2 mm. The largest targeting error was 0.33 mm. The γ‐index (3%, 1 mm) averaged over 10 experiments was >1 in only 1% of pixels for field sizes up to 10 × 10 mm2 and rose to 4.4% as field size increased to 20 × 20 mm2. Table walkout was not affected by load. Walkout shifted the target up to 0.6 mm from CBCT isocenter but, according to computations shifted the dose cloud of the nine‐arc plan by only 0.16 mm. Film measurements verified the small dosimetric effect of walkout, allowing walkout to be neglected during planning and treatment. In the end‐to‐end tests average and maximum targeting errors were 0.30 ± 0.10 and 0.43 mm, respectively. Gamma analysis of coronal and sagittal dose distributions based on a 3%/0.3 mm agreement remained

Purpose To assess the feasibility of using portal dosimetry (PD) for pre‐treatment quality assurance of single target, flattening filter free (FFF), volumetric arc therapy intracranial radiosurgery plans. Methods A PD algorithm was created for a 10X FFF beam on a Varian Edge linear accelerator (Varian Inc, Palo Alto, CA, USA). Treatment plans that were previously evaluated with Gafchromic EBT‐XD (Ashland, Bridgewater, NJ, USA) film were measured via PD and analyzed with the ARIA Portal Dosimetry workspace. Absolute dose evaluation for film and PD was done by computing the mean dose in the region receiving greater than or equal to 90% of the max dose and comparing to the mean dose in the same region calculated by the treatment planning system (TPS). Gamma analysis with 10% threshold and 3%/2 mm passing criteria was performed on film and portal images. Results Thirty‐six PD verification plans were delivered and analyzed. The average PD to TPS dose was 0.989 ± 0.01 while film to TPS dose was 1.026 ± 0.01. All PD plans passed the gamma analysis with 100% of points having gamma

Purpose Developing automated methods to identify task-driven quality assurance (QA) procedures is key toward increasing safety, efficacy, and efficiency. We investigate the use of machine learning (ML) methods for possible visualization, automation, and targeting of QA, and assess its performance using multi-institutional data. Methods To enable automated analysis of QA data given its higher dimensional nature, we used nonlinear kernel mapping with support vector data description (SVDD) driven approaches. Instead of using labeled data as in typical support vector machine (SVM) applications, which requires exhaustive annotation, we applied a clustering extension of SVDD, which identifies the minimal enclosing hypersphere in the feature space defined by a kernel function separating normal operations from possible failures (i.e., outliers). In our case, QA test data are mapped by a Gaussian kernel to a higher dimensional feature space and then the minimal enclosing sphere was identified. This sphere, when mapped back to the input data space along the principal components, can separate the data into several components, each enclosing a separate cluster of QA points that could be used to evaluate tolerance boundaries and test reliability. We evaluated this approach for gantry sag, radiation field shift, and [multileaf collimator (MLC)] offset data acquired using electronic portal imaging devices (EPID), as representative examples. Results Data from eight LINACS and seven institutions (n = 119) were collected. A standardized EPID image of a phantom with fiducials provided deviation estimates between the radiation field and phantom center at four cardinal gantry angles. Deviation measurements in the horizontal direction (0°, 180°) were used to determine the gantry sag and deviations in the vertical direction (90°, 270°) were used to determine the field shift. These measurements were fed into the SVDD clustering algorithm with varying hypersphere radii (Gaussian widths). For gantry sag analysis, two clusters were identified one of which contained 2.5% of the outliers and also exceeded the 1 mm tolerance set by TG-142. In the case of field shifts, SVM clustering identified two distinct classes of measurements primarily driven by variations in the second principal component at 270°. Results from MLC analysis identified one outlier cluster (0.34%) along Leaf offset Constancy (LoC) axis that coincided with TG-142 limits. Conclusion Machine learning methods based on SVDD clustering are promising for developing automated QA tools and providing insights into their reliability and reproducibility.

Purpose This study aimed to report the early toxicity results of a prospective clinical trial of prostate stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) to the entire prostate with a simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-defined focal lesions. Methods and materials Eligible patients included men with biopsy-proven prostate stage T1c to T2c adenocarcinoma, a Gleason score ≤7, and prostate-specific antigen values of ≤20 ng/mL, who had at least 1 focal lesion visible on MRI and a total prostate volume no greater than 120 cm3. SBRT consisted of a dose of 36.25 Gy to the entire prostate with an SIB of 40 Gy to the MRI-defined lesions, delivered in 5 fractions. The primary purpose of the study was to confirm the feasibility of treatment planning/delivery and to estimate the rate of urinary retention requiring placement of a Foley catheter within 90 days of treatment. This study was to be considered successful if urinary retention occurred in no more than 15% of cases, with a planned enrollment of at least 25 patients. Results A total of 26 men were enrolled, and all underwent SBRT as planned. Twenty patients (77%) had intermediate-risk features, and the remainder were low risk. A treatment plan that met the protocol-defined goals for all cases was developed. Two patients (7.7%) developed acute urinary symptoms that required the temporary placement of a Foley catheter. No grade 3+ toxicity events were observed. Conclusions Planning and delivery of prostate SBRT with a whole prostate dose of 36.25 Gy and a focal 40 Gy SIB is feasible. Early follow-up suggests that this treatment is not associated with undue morbidity.

Purpose The task of software development has become an increasing part of the medical physicist's role. Many physicists who are untrained in the best practices of software development have begun creating scripts for clinical use. There is an increasing need for guidance for both developers and medical physicists to code wisely in the clinic. Materials and Methods We created a novel model for assessing risk for custom clinical software analogous to failure modes and effects analysis and propose minimum best practices that should be followed to mitigate the risks. Using this risk model, we integrated a literature review and institutional experience to form a practical guide for risk mitigation. Results Using this new risk assessment model, we outlined several risk mitigation techniques including unit testing, code review, source control, end‐user testing, and commissioning from the literature while sharing our institutional guidelines for evaluating software for risk and implementing these strategies. Conclusion We found very little literature for custom software development guidelines targeted at medical physicists. We have shared our institutional experience and guidelines to help facilitate safe software development for the evolving role of the medical physicist.

Purpose To evaluate the accuracy of an augmented reality holographic guidance system for potential use in patient alignment in radiotherapy applications. Methods A cubic phantom was scanned on a CT simulator and a 3D mesh was extracted using the Eclipse Scripting API. An application was created for the Microsoft HoloLens to allow users to see the scanned mesh as a hologram overlaid in the treatment vault. Six therapists were equipped with the HoloLens glasses and instructed to move the real phantom to align with the perceived spatial hologram using only couch controls. The initial couch coordinates were recorded and then recorded at each step as the therapist moved the phantom to each new location. The application varied the position of the virtual phantom to 10 preprogrammed locations within a 40-cm cubic volume in a combination of vertical, longitudinal, and lateral axis shifts. The absolute position difference between the holographic world and real-world phantom was recorded at each step. Also, the relative position from one position to the next was recorded. Results Fifty shifts were collected across the six therapists. The mean difference between the physical position and instructed holographic position was 0.58 ± 0.31 cm for relative shifts and 0.51 ± 0.33 cm for absolute position. The maximum difference between the holographic position and the actual post shift position was 1.53 cm for relative and 1.58 cm for absolute. Conclusion Holographic augmented reality guidance using the Microsoft HoloLens provides adequate accuracy for initial treatment alignment but lacks the fine alignment accuracy of X-ray imaging systems.

A procedure is presented to assess performance at non-zero couch angles and perform routine quality assurance (QA) on surface-guided radiotherapy (SGRT) imaging systems used for stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). A low-cost anthropomorphic phantom was used to assess the system under patient-like conditions. The phantom is embedded with a tungsten ball bearing (BB) to facilitate the use of surface imaging (SI) with concurrent megavoltage (MV) imaging to cross-compare and validate SI-reported offsets. Data analysis is done via in-house software that utilized the SGRT system's log files for automated analysis. This procedure enables users to assess and inter-compare MV-reported offsets with their SGRT system. The analysis provides SGRT system residual error so that users are aware of inherent offsets present in addition to increases in translational offsets due to couch walkout. The procedure was validated with two commercial SGRT systems. The procedure can be used with any surface imaging system and linear accelerator system.

Purpose Our study reports the clinical outcomes of patients treated with 5-mm isotropic margin, fiducial-guided stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for early stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We also sought to assess the effect of histological subtype on local control. Methods We retrospectively reviewed the charts of all patients treated with SBRT for NSCLC between 2007 and 2017 at our institution. All patients who had implanted fiducial markers, planning target volume (PTV) margins of 5 mm or less, early stage disease (T1-T2, N0), and at least one follow-up CT were included in this analysis. Estimates of local control were generated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and differences between survival curves were assessed using the log-rank test. Results A total of 152 patients met the inclusion criteria for this analysis, with a median follow-up of 27.9 months. Patients received 54 Gy in three fractions for peripheral tumors and 48-52.5 Gy in four to five fractions for central tumors. NSCLC histology was adenocarcinoma in 69 (45.4%) cases, squamous cell carcinoma in 65 (42.8%) cases, and other or non-subtyped in 18 (11.8%) cases. Across the entire cohort, the two-year estimate of local control was 95.1%. When histology was considered, the two-year estimate of local control among patients with adenocarcinoma was 95.6% as compared with 85.0% for patients with other subtypes (p=0.044). Conclusions Fiducial-guided, isotropic 5-mm PTV margin for thoracic SBRT did not compromise local control compared with historical standards. In this series, patients with adenocarcinoma experienced improved local control compared with squamous cell carcinoma.

Treatment of multiple brain metastases with radiosurgery has historically been performed with an isocenter for each individual target. On the Gamma Knife™ (Elekta, Stockholm, Sweden) platform, treatment was and still is performed with one more “shots” for each target; on the linear accelerator, treatment was historically executed with an array of cone- or MLC-based conformal arcs for each target. Clinical evidence and interest have continued to increase in treatment of larger numbers of metastases. For multiple-isocenter radiosurgery, the amount of treatment time required for radiosurgery delivery is positively correlated with the number of targets and each target’s geometric complexity. Single-isocenter treatment utilizes modulated MLC plans to simultaneously treat all targets at once. This approach renders treatment time largely insensitive to the number of targets. However, prior to 2010, treatment planning software platforms were not mature enough to reliably deliver a modulated single-isocenter plan of comparable quality to multiple-isocenter plans.

Small-field dosimetry is challenging, and improper measurement practices have been implicated in several radiosurgery misadministrations. Detector response changes as a function of field size because of the loss of lateral charged particle equilibrium, source occlusion, volume averaging, and the difference between the detector composition and water. The understanding of these effects for candidate detectors is crucial to obtaining measurement data of sufficient accuracy for commissioning and on-going quality assurance of treatment planning systems. Stereotactic field diodes, synthetic diamonds, and plastic scintillation detectors are well suited to the collection of output factors, depth doses, and beam profiles. Radiochromic film is appropriate for patient-specific quality assurance. Clinics should use independent reviews of small-field dosimetry whenever possible.

The consequences of an error in planning or delivery of radiosurgery can be significant. Establishing and maintaining a robust safety culture is the most important factor in minimizing the risk of an error. A quality committee and the use of an incident learning system are key components of a safety culture. Processes should be designed using the application of human factors engineering and failure modes and effects analysis. Checklists are a valuable tool to mitigate risk and should be used as part of the radiosurgery process. Failure modes and effects analysis can be used to guide checklist development. In addition to a safety culture and well-designed processes, adequate resources, well-documented acceptance testing and commissioning, and ongoing quality improvement are necessary to minimize risk in a radiosurgery program.

Rather than an exposition or a chronicling of the development of the many indices that have been developed over the years to judge the quality of a radiosurgery plan, this chapter is designed to serve as a practical reference of the most clinically worthwhile indices. The authors also discuss how some historically used indices are actually detrimental to more important aspects of plan quality, so that the reader may learn from the pitfalls of past practitioners.

Purpose The study aimed to develop and demonstrate a standardized linear accelerator multileaf collimator-based method of delivering small, spherical dose distributions suitable for radiosurgical treatment of small targets such as the trigeminal nerve. Methods and materials The virtual cone is composed of a multileaf collimator–defined field with the central 2 leaves set to a small gap. For 5 table positions, clockwise and counter-clockwise arcs were used with collimator angles of 45 and 135 degrees, respectively. The dose per degree was proportional to the sine of the gantry angle. The dose distribution was calculated by the treatment planning system and measured using radiochromic film in a skull phantom for leaf gaps of 1.6, 2.1, and 2.6 mm. Cones with a diameter of 4 mm and 5 mm were measured for comparison. Output factor constancy was investigated using a parallel-plate chamber. Results The mean ratio of the measured-to-calculated dose was 0.99, 1.03, and 1.05 for 1.6, 2.1, and 2.6 mm leaf gaps, respectively. The diameter of the measured (calculated) 50% isodose line was 4.9 (4.6) mm, 5.2 (5.1) mm, and 5.5 (5.5) mm for the 1.6, 2.1, and 2.6 mm leaf gap, respectively. The measured diameter of the 50% isodose line was 4.5 and 5.7 mm for the 4 mm and 5 mm cones, respectively. The standard deviation of the parallel-plate chamber signal relative to a 10 cm × 10 cm field was less than 0.4%. The relative signal changed 32% per millimeter change in leaf gap, indicating that the parallel-plate chamber is sensitive to changes in gap width. Conclusions The virtual cone is an efficient technique for treatment of small spherical targets. Patient-specific quality assurance measurements will not be necessary in routine clinical use. Integration directly into the treatment planning system will make planning using this technique extremely efficient.

A substantial barrier to the single-and multi-institutional aggregation of data to supporting clinical trials, practice quality improvement efforts, and development of big data analytics resource systems is the lack of standardized nomenclatures for expressing dosimetric data. To address this issue, the American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM) Task Group 263 was charged with providing nomenclature guidelines and values in radiation oncology for use in clinical trials, data-pooling initiatives, population-based studies, and routine clinical care by standardizing: (1) structure names across image processing and treatment planning system platforms; (2) nomenclature for dosimetric data (eg, doseevolume histogram [DVH]-based metrics); (3) templates for clinical trial groups and users of an initial subset of software platforms to facilitate adoption of the standards; (4) formalism for nomenclature schema, which can accommodate the addition of other structures defined in the future. A multisociety, multidisciplinary, multinational group of 57 members representing stake holders ranging from large academic centers to community clinics and vendors was assembled, including physicists, physicians, dosimetrists, and vendors. The stakeholder groups represented in the membership included the AAPM, American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO), NRG Oncology, European Society for Radiation Oncology (ESTRO), Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG), Children's Oncology Group (COG), Integrating Healthcare Enterprise in Radiation Oncology (IHE-RO), and Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine working group (DICOM WG); A nomenclature system for target and organ at risk volumes and DVH nomenclature was developed and piloted to demonstrate viability across a range of clinics and within the framework of clinical trials. The final report was approved by AAPM in October 2017. The approval process included review by 8 AAPM committees, with additional review by ASTRO, European Society for Radiation Oncology (ESTRO), and American Association of Medical Dosimetrists (AAMD). This Executive Summary of the report highlights the key recommendations for clinical practice, research, and trials. (C) 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S) Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) is increasingly utilized as a definitive treatment option for patients with prostate adenocarcinoma, especially in the low or intermediate risk setting. The aim of this study is to assess the late toxicity and biochemical recurrence rates of a single institution prospective clinical trial evaluating prostate SBRT with simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) targeting focal lesions as defined by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). MATERIALS/METHODS Patients were eligible if they had biopsy-proven low or intermediate risk prostate adenocarcinoma with initial prostate specific antigen (PSA) values ≤20 ng/mL, clinical stage from T1c to T2c, and Gleason score ≤7. Patients also had to have one or more focal lesions on MRI and an MRI-defined total prostate volume of < 120 cm3. All patients received SBRT delivered to the entire prostate to a dose of 36.25 Gy in 5 fractions with an SIB to the lesions seen on MRI to 40 Gy in 5 fractions. Late toxicity was defined as any possible treatment-related adverse event occurring after three months from the completion of SBRT and graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0 (CTCAE v4.0). Biochemical recurrence was defined by the Phoenix definition of PSA increase of 2 ng/mL above the nadir. RESULTS A total of 26 patients were enrolled, and all enrolled patients underwent planned SBRT. Six patients (23.1%) had low risk disease and twenty patients had intermediate risk disease (76.9%). Eight patients (30.8%) received androgen deprivation therapy. Median follow up was 40.5 months (range 12-64 months). No biochemical failures have yet been observed. Three patients (11.5%) experienced late grade 2 genitourinary (GU) toxicity requiring cystoscopy; two of these three patients experienced hematuria requiring cystoscopy and one patient experienced dysuria requiring cystoscopy. Six patients (23.1%) had late grade 2 GU toxicity requiring medications such as tamsulosin or oxybutynin. Two patients (7.7%) had late grade 2 gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity; both patients experienced hematochezia requiring colonoscopy and were found to have proctitis requiring steroids per rectum. There was no grade 3 or higher toxicity events observed. CONCLUSION The results of this study support that SBRT to the entire prostate to a dose of 36.25 Gy in 5 fractions with focal SIB to 40 Gy in 5 fractions is not associated with undue late GI or GU toxicity. Thus far, this regimen has excellent biochemical control. Focal dose escalation with an SIB planning approach may be an opportunity to improve biochemical control while limiting dose to nearby organs at risk.

Purpose: Limited data exist on fractionated stereotactic radiation therapy (FSRT) for brain metastases. We sought to evaluate the safety and efficacy of FSRT and further define its role in brain metastasis management. Methods and materials: A total of 72 patients were treated with linear accelerator–based FSRT to 182 previously untreated, intact brain metastases. Targets received 25 or 30 Gy in 5 fractions. All targets within the same course received the same prescription regardless of size. Toxicity was recorded per Radiation Therapy Oncology Group central nervous system toxicity criteria. Results: The median follow-up was 5 months (range, 1-71 months). The Kaplan-Meier estimate of 12-month local control was 86%. Tumors

Purpose The Imaging and Radiation Oncology Core – Houston (IROC-H) Quality Assurance Center (formerly the Radiological Physics Center) has reported varying levels of compliance from their anthropomorphic phantom auditing program. IROC-H studies have suggested that one source of disagreement between institution submitted calculated doses and measurement is the accuracy of the institution's treatment planning system dose calculations and heterogeneity corrections used. In order to audit this step of the radiation therapy treatment process, an independent dose calculation tool is needed. Methods Monte Carlo multiple source models for Varian Flattening Filter Free (FFF) 6MV and FFF 10MV therapeutic x-ray beams were commissioned based on central axis depth dose data from a 10 x 10 cm2 field size and dose profiles for a 40 x 40 cm2 field size. The models were validated against open field measurements in a water tank for field sizes ranging from 3 x 3 cm2 to 40 x 40 cm2. The models were then benchmarked against IROC-H's anthropomorphic head and neck phantom and lung phantom measurements. Results Validation results, assessed with a ±2%/2mm gamma criterion, showed average agreement of 99.9% and 99.0% for central axis depth dose data for FFF 6MV and FFF 10MV models, respectively. Dose profile agreement using the same evaluation technique averaged 97.8% and 97.9% for the respective models. Phantom benchmarking comparisons were evaluated with a ±3%/2mm gamma criterion, and agreement averaged 90.1% and 90.8% for the respective models. Conclusions Multiple source models for Varian FFF 6MV and FFF 10MV beams have been developed, validated, and benchmarked for inclusion in an independent dose calculation quality assurance tool for use in clinical trial audits. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Purpose The purpose of this study was to evaluate dose prescription and recording compliance to international standard (International Commission on Radiation Units & Measurements [ICRU]-83) in patients treated with intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) among academic institutions. Methods and materials Ten institutions participated in this study to collect IMRT data to evaluate compliance to ICRU-83. Under institutional review board clearance, data from 5094 patients—including treatment site, technique, planner, physician, prescribed dose, target volume, monitor units, planning system, and dose calculation algorithm—were collected anonymously. The dose-volume histogram of each patient, as well as dose points, doses delivered to 100% (D100), 98% (D98), 95% (D95), 50% (D50), and 2% (D2), of sites was collected and sent to a central location for analysis. Homogeneity index (HI) as a measure of the steepness of target and is a measure of the shape of the dose-volume histogram was calculated for every patient and analyzed. Results In general, ICRU recommendations for naming the target, reporting dose prescription, and achieving desired levels of dose to target were relatively poor. The nomenclature for the target in the dose prescription had large variations, having every permutation of name and number contrary to ICRU recommendations. There was statistically significant variability in D95, D50, and HI among institutions, tumor site, and technique with P values Conclusions Nearly 95% of patient treatments deviated from the ICRU-83 recommended D50 prescription dose delivery. This variability is significant (P