Search

© 2014 Mason et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.Emergency Department demand continues to rise in almost all high-income countries, including those with universal coverage and a strong primary care network. Many of these countries have been experimenting w

Objectives: Acute confusional state (ACS) is a common cause of admission to the emergency department (ED). It can be related to numerous etiologies. Electroencephalography (EEG) can show specific abnormalities in cases of non-convulsive status epilepticus (NCSE), or metabolic or toxic encephalopathy. However, up to 80% of patients with a final diagnosis of NCSE have an ACS initially attributed to another cause. The exact place of EEG in the diagnostic work-up remains unclear., Methods: Data of consecutive patients admitted to the ED for an ACS in a two-year period and who were referred for an EEG were collected. The initial working diagnosis was based on medical history, clinical, biological and imaging investigations allowing classification into four diagnostic categories. Comparison to the final diagnosis was performed after EEG recordings (and sometimes additional tests) were performed, which allowed the reclassification of some patients from one category to another., Results: Seventy-five patients (mean age: 71.1 years) were included with the following suspected diagnoses: seizures for 8 (11%), encephalopathy for 14 (19%), other cause for 34 (45%) and unknown for 19 (25%). EEG was recorded after a mean of 1.5 days after symptom onset, and resulted in the reclassification of patients as follows: seizure for 15 (20%), encephalopathy for 15 (20%), other cause for 29 (39%) and unknown cause for 16 (21%). Moreover, ongoing epileptic activity (NCSE or seizure) and interictal epileptiform activity were found in eight (11%) patients initially diagnosed in another category., Discussion: In our cohort, EEG was a key examination in the management strategy of ACS in 11% of patients admitted to the ED. It resulted in a diagnosis of epilepsy in these patients admitted with unusual confounding presentations., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest Pierre Lozeron received financial support from LFB to attend medical congresses. Sabine Prud'hon, Hélène Amiel, Nathalie Kubis and Adrien Zanin declare that they have no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.)

BACKGROUND Ethanol intoxication is very common, and several forms of alcohol intoxication can lead to emergency department visits. Excessive alcohol users, when in withdrawal, might seek replacement alcoholic beverages; one of the common sources of ethanol is hand sanitizer, which contains 45-95% alcohol. It becomes even more challenging to deal with alcohol use disorder patients when they seek these replacement products inside hospital premises, and medical clinics and hospitals have increased their use of ethanol-based hand sanitizer since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic. CASE REPORT We report the case of a 26-year-old man with alcohol dependence presenting with a fictitious illness leading to hospital admission and consumption of ethanol-based hand sanitizer in the emergency department (ED). The patient initially presented reporting severe abdominal pain that persisted despite medications. The initial laboratory tests and imaging were non-significant. The patient was later caught stealing hand sanitizer bottles, consuming them within 4-6 h. The COVID-19 pandemic has increased alcohol intoxication, especially in EDs. Hand sanitizers, including ethanol, are toxic and hazardous when misused, mostly by adolescents and young adults. Treatments include glucose determination, dextrose infusion, and thiamine perfusion. Strategies to reduce ethanol intoxication include eliminating hand sanitizers, using wall-fixed sanitizers, and using sanitizer wipes. CONCLUSIONS Patients with alcohol use disorder are known to develop alcohol-seeking behaviors. This report has highlighted that healthcare professionals should be aware that the increased availability of ethanol-based hand sanitizers, some of which contain toxic antiviral chemical agents, may be targeted by individuals with alcohol dependency.

Rationale and Objectives: Interpreting radiographs in emergency settings is stressful and a burden for radiologists. The main objective was to assess the performance of three commercially available artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms for detecting acute peripheral fractures on radiographs in daily emergency practice., Materials and Methods: Radiographs were collected from consecutive patients admitted for skeletal trauma at our emergency department over a period of 2 months. Three AI algorithms-SmartUrgence, Rayvolve, and BoneView-were used to analyze 13 body regions. Four musculoskeletal radiologists determined the ground truth from radiographs. The diagnostic performance of the three AI algorithms was calculated at the level of the radiography set. Accuracies, sensitivities, and specificities for each algorithm and two-by-two comparisons between algorithms were obtained. Analyses were performed for the whole population and for subgroups of interest (sex, age, body region)., Results: A total of 1210 patients were included (mean age 41.3 ± 18.5 years; 742 [61.3%] men), corresponding to 1500 radiography sets. The fracture prevalence among the radiography sets was 23.7% (356/1500). Accuracy was 90.1%, 71.0%, and 88.8% for SmartUrgence, Rayvolve, and BoneView, respectively; sensitivity 90.2%, 92.6%, and 91.3%, with specificity 92.5%, 70.4%, and 90.5%. Accuracy and specificity were significantly higher for SmartUrgence and BoneView than Rayvolve for the whole population (P < .0001) and for subgroups. The three algorithms did not differ in sensitivity (P = .27). For SmartUrgence, subgroups did not significantly differ in accuracy, specificity, or sensitivity. For Rayvolve, accuracy and specificity were significantly higher with age 27-36 than ≥53 years (P = .0029 and P = .0019). Specificity was higher for the subgroup knee than foot (P = .0149). For BoneView, accuracy was significantly higher for the subgroups knee than foot (P = .0006) and knee than wrist/hand (P = .0228). Specificity was significantly higher for the subgroups knee than foot (P = .0003) and ankle than foot (P = .0195)., Conclusion: The performance of AI detection of acute peripheral fractures in daily radiological practice in an emergency department was good to high and was related to the AI algorithm, patient age, and body region examined., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest Valérie Bousson is a paid consultant for Milvue starting July 1, 2022. Grégoire Attané was paid by Gleamer between March and August 2019 to label radiographs. The remaining authors declare none. The three companies, Milvue, AZmed, and Gleamer, provided the AI algorithms to our radiology department for free. None of the three companies had access to the study methodology or data during the course of the study., (Copyright © 2023 The Association of University Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has imposed unforeseen and unprecedented constraints on emergency departments (EDs). In this study, we detail the organizational and managerial tools recently implemented among 5 academic EDs in a French region particularly affected by COVID-19 and analyze how EDs responded to the COVID-19-related disease burden during different phases of the epidemic. Initially, they focused on the early detection of suspected cases by identifying 3 predominant COVID-19 syndromes. During this diagnostic process, patients were placed in respiratory isolation (facial mask before triage) and droplet isolation (ED rooms). A 3-level strategy for triage, clinical pathways in the EDs, and the organization of hospital spaces was based on the real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) COVID-19 positivity rate, with ED strategies adapted to the exigencies of each level. This crisis demonstrated hospitals' adaptability and capacity to mobilize in the face of new risks, with hospitals and EDs coordinating their management to reallocate resources, optimize interoperability, and rethink patient pathways. This report on their processes may assist hospitals and EDs in areas currently spared by the new variants., Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2022 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: The relevance of syndromic multiplex-PCR for the etiological diagnosis of meningitis or meningoencephalitis is still a matter of debate. Here, we studied the impact of a 24/7 multiplex-PCR on the management of patients consulting in the emergency department for suspicion of community-acquired meningitis., Methods: We conducted a single-center retrospective study at the Emergency department of Lariboisière University Hospital (Paris, France) including all patients suspected of meningitis. During period 1 (April 2014-March 2017), the molecular assays used for the detection of infectious agents in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) were performed during the daytime. During period 2 (April 2017-March 2019), multiplex-PCR (BioFire® Filmarray® Meningitis/Encephalitis Panel [ME], bioMérieux) was performed 24/7., Results: During the periods 1 and 2, 4 100 and 3 574 patients were included and 284 (6.9%) and 308 (8.6%) meningitis were diagnosed, respectively. During the periods 1 and 2, the most common causes of meningitis were enterovirus (23.9% and 29.5%), varicella zoster virus (10.2% and 6.8%) and herpes simplex virus-2 (4.2% and 8.1%). For patients with confirmed viral meningitis, a significant decrease was found between period 1 and period 2, respectively for the rate of hospitalization (73.9% vs 42.0%; p < 0.05), the length of stay (3[2–5] vs 2[1–3] days; p < 0.05), the empirical antiviral (26.1% vs 14.5%) and antibacterial administrations (29.3% vs 14.5%; p < 0.05)., Conclusions: Multiplex-PCR is an important tool in the diagnosis of infectious meningitis in the emergency department and is relevant in the management of meningitis by screening for patients who do not require hospitalization and antibacterial therapy., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest None to declare.

Background: Vaccination is one of the most effective ways to fight the influenza epidemic and the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, which represent a major public issue. The objective was to investigate the adherence of heads of French emergency departments (ED) and nursing departments on a potential vaccination campaign of healthcare workers (HCW) and patients in ED., Method: In February 2021, ED and nursing department heads were asked to answer a national survey. It included 24 questions designed to cover some dimensions, including characteristics of the hospital and emergency departments (ED) and questions on vaccination., Results: 414 responses out of 800 questionnaires (51.8%) were collected. Scores out of 10 were, respectively, 7 (6-8) and 8 (6-9) for vaccination against influenza and COVID-19 for HCW and 2 (2-3) and 2 (2-4) for ED patients (H = 989.3; p < 0.0001). Multivariate logistic regression found that the existence of a vaccine program in the hospital and the use of point of care influenza PCR in ED were positively associated with the acceptance of influenza vaccination campaign for HCW ( p = 0.003) and patients ( p = 0.015). Factors limiting adherence to a vaccination program of HCW and patients were lack of medical staff ( p = 0.041 for HCW and p < 0.0001 for patients), overcrowded ED ( p < 0.001), and the inability to follow up with patients after the ED visit ( p < 0.0001)., Conclusions: There have been many missed opportunities for influenza vaccination, and there is pressure to vaccinate against COVID-19 as soon as possible. Vaccination campaigns in ED could help to improve vaccination coverage. ED staff are more likely to vaccinate HCW than patients. There are factors that support the implementation of such programs, which can be grouped into a culture of diagnosis, control, and prevention of viral infectious diseases within the hospital and ED. On the other hand, there are limiting factors, such as overcrowding and lack of personnel.

Aims: The aim of this study was to analyse delays in emergency medical system transfer of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients to percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) centres according to transport modality in a rural French region., Methods and Results: Data from the prospective multicentre CRAC / France PCI registry were analysed for 1911 STEMI patients: 410 transferred by helicopter and 1501 by ground transport. The primary endpoint was the percentage of transfers with first medical contact to primary percutaneous coronary intervention within the 90 minutes recommended in guidelines. The secondary endpoint was time of first medical contact to primary percutaneous coronary intervention. With helicopter transport, time of first medical contact to primary percutaneous coronary intervention in under 90 minutes was less frequently achieved than with ground transport (9.8% vs. 37.2%; odds ratio 5.49; 95% confidence interval 3.90; 7.73; P <0.0001). Differences were greatest for transfers under 50 km (13.7% vs. 44.7%; P <0.0001) and for primary transfers (22.4% vs. 49.6%; P <0.0001). The median time from first medical contact to primary percutaneous coronary intervention and from symptom onset to primary percutaneous coronary intervention (total ischaemic time) were significantly higher in the helicopter transport group than in the ground transport group (respectively, 137 vs. 103 minutes; P <0.0001 and 261 vs. 195 minutes; P <0.0001). There was no significant difference in inhospital mortality between the helicopter and ground transport groups (6.9% vs. 6.6%; P =0.88)., Conclusions: Helicopter transport of STEMI patients was five times less effective than ground transport in maintaining the 90-minute first medical contact to primary percutaneous coronary intervention time recommended in guidelines, particularly for transfer distances less than 50 km.

ED-visits and through-ED admissions to medical/surgical wards (MSW) and intensive care unit (ICU) during influenza, COVID-19 and lockdown periods were evaluated in a four-hospital prospective observational study from November 2018 to March 2020. ED visit characteristics and main diagnostic categories were assessed. Analysis of 368,262 ED-visits highlighted a significantly increasing trend in ED-visits during influenza followed by a significantly decreasing trend after lockdown. For MSW-admissions, a pattern of growth during influenza was followed by a fall that began during COVID-19 pandemic and intensified during the lockdown. For ICU-admissions, a significant rise during the COVID-19 pandemic was followed by diminution during the lockdown period. During lockdown, significantly diminishing trends were shown for all diagnostic categories (between -40.8% and -73.6%), except influenza-like illness/COVID cases (+31.6%), Pulmonary embolism/deep vein thrombosis (+33.5%) and frequent users (+188.0%). The present study confirms an increase in demand during the influenza epidemic and during the initial phase of the COVID-19 epidemic, but a drop in activity during the lockdown, mainly related to non-COVID conditions. Syndromic surveillance of ILI cases in ED is a tool for monitoring influenza and COVID-19, and it can predict ED activity and the need for MSW and ICU beds.

Emergency Department demand continues to rise in almost all high-income countries, including those with universal coverage and a strong primary care network. Many of these countries have been experimenting with innovative methods to stem demand for acute care, while at the same time providing much needed services that can prevent Emergency Department attendance and later hospital admissions. A large proportion of patients comprise of those with minor illnesses that could potentially be seen by a health care provider in a primary care setting. The increasing number of visits to Emergency Departments not only causes delay in urgent care provision but also increases the overall cost. In the UK, the National Health Service (NHS) has made a number of efforts to strengthen primary healthcare services to increase accessibility to healthcare as well as address patients' needs by introducing new urgent care services.

The maturation of emergency medicine (EM) as a specialty has coincided with dramatic increases in emergency department (ED) visit rates, both in the United States and around the world. ED crowding has become a public health problem where periodic supply and demand mismatches in ED and hospital resources cause long waiting times and delays in critical treatments. ED crowding has been associated with several negative clinical outcomes, including higher complication rates and mortality. This article describes emergency care systems and the extent of crowding across 15 countries outside of the United States: Australia, Canada, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Hong Kong, India, Iran, Italy, The Netherlands, Saudi Arabia, Catalonia (Spain), Sweden, and the United Kingdom. The authors are local emergency care leaders with knowledge of emergency care in their particular countries. Where available, data are provided about visit patterns in each country; however, for many of these countries, no national data are available on ED visits rates or crowding. For most of the countries included, there is both objective evidence of increases in ED visit rates and ED crowding and also subjective assessments of trends toward higher crowding in the ED. ED crowding appears to be worsening in many countries despite the presence of universal health coverage. Scandinavian countries with robust systems to manage acute care outside the ED do not report crowding is a major problem. The main cause for crowding identified by many authors is the boarding of admitted patients, similar to the United States. Many hospitals in these countries have implemented operational interventions to mitigate crowding in the ED, and some countries have imposed strict limits on ED length of stay (LOS), while others have no clear plan to mitigate crowding. An understanding of the causes and potential solutions implemented in these countries can provide a lens into how to mitigate ED crowding in the United States through health policy interventions and hospital operational changes., (© 2011 by the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.)

Functional thyrotropin receptors (TSH-R) have recently been detected in fat cells but not in liver cells from rat, and it seems that in infant adipocytes stimulatory TSH-R antibodies (TSH-R-ab) act through this receptor pathway, resulting in increased triglyceride catabolism. We investigated the relationships between plasma TSH-R-ab and free thyroxine (FT4) levels and plasma lipid or lipoprotein values in 49 untreated adult women with Graves' disease, all positive for these antibodies. A simple positive correlation (p < 0.01) was found between TSH-R-ab levels and FT4 values (r = 0.40). Simple positive correlations (p < 0.001) were found between triglyceride levels and FT4 (r = 0.51) or TSH-R-ab (r = 0.52) values. Multiple regression analysis confirmed that both FT4 and TSH-R-ab are strong (p < 0.005) predictors of triglyceride (FT4: partial r = 0.40; TSH: partial r = 0.39). Simple negative correlations (p < 0.05, at least) were found between FT4 levels and total cholesterol (TC) (r = -0.45), low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-C (r = -0.46), apoprotein (apo)-B (r = -0.31) or high-density lipoprotein (HDL)-C (r = -0.55) values. Among these lipid parameters, only HDL-C levels (r = -0.31, p < 0.05) correlated to TSH-R-ab values. However, multiple regression analysis revealed that while FT4 is a strong predictor (p < 0.005) of TC (partial r = -0.42), LDL-C (partial r = -0.43) or HDL-C (partial r = 0.47), TSH-R-ab are not. Thus, the apparent positive relationship between TSH-R-ab and HDL-C results from the positive correlation between TSH-R-ab and FT4. In conclusion, this study suggests that stimulating TSH-R-ab are involved in triglyceride metabolism. In contrast to thyroid hormones, these antibodies seem not to be related to cholesterol metabolism.