27 results on '"Re, Martina"'
Search Results
2. Exploring depression in people with schizophrenia spectrum disorders: A cross-sectional analysis of the clinical relationship with Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale dimensions
- Author
-
Bartoli, F, Calabrese, A, Moretti, F, Castiglioni, M, Prestifilippo, L, De Pietra, A, Gazzola, M, Camera, P, Crocamo, C, Carrà, G, Bachi, B, Barbieri, F, Bartoccetti, A, Bassetti, C, Bernasconi, G, Bommartini, C, Bona, P, Boniello, F, Callovini, T, Canestro, A, Capogrosso, C, Cavaleri, D, Cioni, R, Colangelo, F, Di Lella, M, Gianfelice, L, Guzzi, P, Lauria, G, Limonta, S, Lucini Paioni, S, Mauro, S, Morello, P, Morreale, M, Nasti, C, Palpella, D, Piacenti, S, Re, M, Villa, O, Bartoli, Francesco, Calabrese, Angela, Moretti, Federico, Castiglioni, Marta, Prestifilippo, Luca, De Pietra, Aldo, Gazzola, Marco, Camera, Paolo, Crocamo, Cristina, Carrà, Giuseppe, Bachi, Bianca, Barbieri, Filippo Fabio, Bartoccetti, Alessandra, Bassetti, Carlo, Bernasconi, Gianna, Bommartini, Carlo, Bona, Paolo, Boniello, Federica, Callovini, Tommaso, Canestro, Aurelia, Capogrosso, Chiara Alessandra, Cavaleri, Daniele, Cioni, Riccardo Matteo, Colangelo, Francesca, Di Lella, Maria Elisa, Gianfelice, Letizia, Guzzi, Pierluca, Lauria, Giada, Limonta, Serena, Lucini Paioni, Susanna, Mauro, Stefano, Morello, Pietro, Morreale, Marco, Nasti, Christian, Palpella, Dario, Piacenti, Susanna, Re, Martina, Villa, Oliviero., Bartoli, F, Calabrese, A, Moretti, F, Castiglioni, M, Prestifilippo, L, De Pietra, A, Gazzola, M, Camera, P, Crocamo, C, Carrà, G, Bachi, B, Barbieri, F, Bartoccetti, A, Bassetti, C, Bernasconi, G, Bommartini, C, Bona, P, Boniello, F, Callovini, T, Canestro, A, Capogrosso, C, Cavaleri, D, Cioni, R, Colangelo, F, Di Lella, M, Gianfelice, L, Guzzi, P, Lauria, G, Limonta, S, Lucini Paioni, S, Mauro, S, Morello, P, Morreale, M, Nasti, C, Palpella, D, Piacenti, S, Re, M, Villa, O, Bartoli, Francesco, Calabrese, Angela, Moretti, Federico, Castiglioni, Marta, Prestifilippo, Luca, De Pietra, Aldo, Gazzola, Marco, Camera, Paolo, Crocamo, Cristina, Carrà, Giuseppe, Bachi, Bianca, Barbieri, Filippo Fabio, Bartoccetti, Alessandra, Bassetti, Carlo, Bernasconi, Gianna, Bommartini, Carlo, Bona, Paolo, Boniello, Federica, Callovini, Tommaso, Canestro, Aurelia, Capogrosso, Chiara Alessandra, Cavaleri, Daniele, Cioni, Riccardo Matteo, Colangelo, Francesca, Di Lella, Maria Elisa, Gianfelice, Letizia, Guzzi, Pierluca, Lauria, Giada, Limonta, Serena, Lucini Paioni, Susanna, Mauro, Stefano, Morello, Pietro, Morreale, Marco, Nasti, Christian, Palpella, Dario, Piacenti, Susanna, Re, Martina, and Villa, Oliviero.
- Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Evidence on the relationship between depression and clinical dimensions of schizophrenia remains limited. This cross-sectional study investigated the association between depression and Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) dimensions in people with schizophrenia spectrum disorders. METHODS: Trained assessors administered the PANSS to measure symptoms of schizophrenia and the Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia to measure depression. The association of depression with overall PANSS score and related dimensions was investigated in multiple logistic regression analyses. RESULTS: We included 231 inpatients with schizophrenia spectrum disorders (mean age: 42.4 (SD: 12.9) years; men: 58.9%; mean overall PANSS score: 82.5 (SD: 20.1); drug-free or naïve: 39.3%), including 78 (33.8%) with clinically significant depressive symptoms. Depression was associated with higher overall (regression coefficient, SE: 0.029, 0.008; p < 0.001) and general psychopathology (regression coefficient, SE: 0.118, 0.023; p < 0.001) PANSS scores. We found an inverse relationship between depression and positive symptoms (regression coefficient, SE: -0.088, 0.028; p = 0.002). No association between depression and negative symptoms was found. CONCLUSION: Despite some limitations, our study shows that people affected by schizophrenia spectrum disorders with depression are likely to show more overall and general psychopathology symptoms but lower positive symptoms. Additional studies are needed to explore the generalizability of our findings.
- Published
- 2024
3. Punctate white matter lesions of preterm infants: Risk factor analysis
- Author
-
Parodi, Alessandro, Malova, Mariya, Cardiello, Valentina, Raffa, Sarah, Re, Martina, Calevo, Maria Grazia, Severino, Mariasavina, Tortora, Domenico, Morana, Giovanni, Rossi, Andrea, and Ramenghi, Luca Antonio
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
4. PPILOW: innovations for improving the welfare of pigs and poultry in low-input and organic farming systems
- Author
-
Rodenburg, T, Niemi, Jarkko, Re, Martina, Coletta, Monica, Tuyttens, Frank A.M., Desaint, Brieuc, Lombard, Sarah, Steenfeldt, Sanna, Thobe, Petra, Carelli, Riccardo, Bonnefous, Claire, Collin, Anne, Utrecht University [Utrecht], Natural Resources Institute Finland (LUKE), Associazione Italiana per l'Agricoltura Biologica (AIAB), Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna (SSSA), Research Institute for Agricultural, Fisheries and Food (ILVO), Institut Technique de l'Agriculture Biologique (ITAB), Aarhus University [Aarhus], Thuenen Institute of Farm Economics, European Association for Animal Production (EAAP), Biologie des Oiseaux et Aviculture (BOA), Université de Tours (UT)-Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement (INRAE), ArMoR cluster, and European Project: 816172,H2020-EU.3.2.1.1. - Increasing production efficiency and coping with climate change, while ensuring sustainability and resilience ,PPILOW (2019)
- Subjects
[SDV]Life Sciences [q-bio] - Abstract
International audience; INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVEPPILOW is a multiactor project aiming to co-create with end-users innovations for improving the welfare of pigs and poultry in low-input outdoor and organic farming systems. The PPILOW participatory approach involves National Practitioner Groups (NPG) in co-building innovative breeding and rearing strategies and techniques on this purpose. Firstly, the project gathers a comprehensive inventory of the ethical, socio-economic and technical factors that are essential to improve poultry and pig welfare in organic and low-input outdoor production systems, providing a shortlist of potential levers of improvement that are experimentally- and on-farm-tested within the project. The NPGs also co-build and test with PPILOW partners mobile applications for assessing and benchmarking animal welfare status on-farm, and tools for evaluating the sustainability of the tested lever based on the One Welfare concept. METHODS AND RESULTSPPILOW partners organized the participatory approach by setting-up nine NPG dedicated to pig or poultry in six countries. The NPG identified barriers to welfare and levers for improvement, and co-created with partners shared tools and strategies for improving animal welfare to be tested experimentally and on-field. Standardized mobile apps for farmers to self-assess and benchmark on-farm the welfare status of the animals were co-developed (PIGLOW® for pigs) or refined (EBENE® for poultry) with NPG, and made EU-freely available in 9 and 7 European languages, respectively. They are currently being evaluated in longitudinal on-farm studies. Meanwhile, the creation of a data collection framework based on the One Welfare approach centred on both human and animal welfare has been co-created with NPGs. The first experimental strategy focuses on enrichments allowing keeping laying hens and fattening pigs in organic and low-input systems without beak trimming and castration, currently applied to prevent feather pecking and boar taint in meat in laying hens and in pigs, respectively. Studies on alternatives, on the one hand to beak trimming using innovative incubation and insect larvae enrichment in laying hens, and on the other hand to piglet castration through the rearing of entire male pigs with enrichments, have been completed and are currently analyzed. The second strategy explores two strategies for avoiding killing day-old layer male chicks: raising dual-purpose breeds for both egg and meat productions and developing a new in ovo sexing method. Three experimental trials are comparing dual-purpose genotypes in three countries. The ones completed on both males and females showed a high variability of technical performance between genotypes, due to different strategy for crosses, exhibiting less or high layer or meat potentials, and the egg quality results for the different crosses were assessed. On-farm trials have started for enabling the multicriteria evaluation of the use of male genotypes, and the field studies on females have been engaged with voluntary NPG participants. Concerning in-ovo sexing, refinements on methodologies for electrophysical sensing are currently running. The PPILOW project also aims to propose innovative solutions for favouring positive behaviours, health and robustness through an increased adaptation to organic and outdoor systems for laying hens, slow-growing broilers and pigs. Studies with different broiler genotypes have allowed a better understanding of the determinants of exploratory behaviour, showing that ranging behaviour is stable over time and that high-ranging broilers are more prone to work for food than low-rangers. Early management levers for improving resilience are also currently tested, including the experimental use of temperature variations during incubation, and the set-up of on-farm hatching trials with NPG members. Partners working with layers and pigs are developing strategies to limit intestinal parasitic and bacterial infections through different feed supplements, based both on in vitro and in vivo studies. In infected layers, the effect of a feed based on fermented products has been tested. Microbiological, immunological and parasitic profiles were obtained in pigs, and in vitro methods for the screening of plant extracts have been established, showing the high potential of some plants to limit worm infections. Joint protocols are developed and implemented to improve sow welfare and piglet survival through selective breeding and an innovative farrowing house design for outdoor rearing of sows and piglets. These innovative devices are currently tested in pig NPG members’ farms, with a close follow-up by NPG facilitator partners. The most promising PPILOW strategies are evaluated through multicriteria analyses according to the One Welfare concept, and business models are developed.CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONSPromising results of the project on the limitation of feather pecking in laying hens and aggressive behaviour in non-castrated pigs, of parasite development from pigs reared in low-input farms by the use of plant extracts, and for favouring piglet survival are currently obtained, which could help limiting the use of veterinary products, not only in low-input and organic farms, but also in conventional farms. Ultimately, the PPILOW project will also bring data on the feasibility of using such levers of improvement of pig and poultry health and welfare, and human well-being within the scope of the One Welfare concept. The project PPILOW has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement N°816172.
- Published
- 2023
5. Consumer views on animal welfare and organic and low-input farming: Results from a European survey
- Author
-
Niemi, Jarkko, Väre, Minna, Lähtinen, Katja, Heinola, Katriina, Mikkola, Jarmo, Parrott, Patricia, van Vooren, Laura, Kliphuis, Saskia, Thobe, Petra, Zuliani, Anna, Re, Martina, Coletta, Monica, Accotto, Caterina, Ponzio, Raffaella, Alibert, Laurent, Roguet, Christine, Delanoue, Elsa, Cozma, Vasile, Spinu, Marina, Herremans, Sophie, Rangel Pedersen, Ninfa, Steenfeldt, Sanna, Bonnefous, Claire, Collin, Anne, Natural Resources Institute Finland (LUKE), Harper Adams University, BioForum Vlaanderen, Utrecht University [Utrecht], Thünen Institute, Veterinari Senza Frontiere Italia, Sede c/o Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale delle Venezie viale dell'Università, Associazione Italiana per l'Agricoltura Biologica (AIAB), Slow Food Biodiversity, Institut du Porc (IFIP), USAMV, Centre Wallon de Recherches Agronomiques (CRA-W), Fermentation Experts, Aarhus University [Aarhus], Biologie des Oiseaux et Aviculture (BOA), Université de Tours (UT)-Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement (INRAE), This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No 816172, PPILOW, and European Project: 816172,H2020-EU.3.2.1.1. - Increasing production efficiency and coping with climate change, while ensuring sustainability and resilience ,PPILOW (2019)
- Subjects
[SDV]Life Sciences [q-bio] ,[SHS]Humanities and Social Sciences - Abstract
International audience
- Published
- 2022
6. The PPILOW project: Innovations improving welfare in low input and organic pig and poultry farms
- Author
-
Collin, Anne, Meloni, Giuditta, Bonnefous, Claire, Re, Martina, van Vooren, Laura, Niemi, Jarkko, Väre, Minna, Lähtinen, Katja, Tuyttens, Frank A.M., Graat, Evelien, Vanden Hole, Charlotte, Rodenburg, Tb (bas), Kliphuis, Saskia, Giersberg, Mona, Tavares, Olivia, Desaint, Brieuc, Steenfeldt, Sanna, Pedersen, Lene, Engberg, Ricarda M., Almadani Mohamad, Isam, Carelli, Riccardo, Sciarretta, Marlene, Guilloteau, Laurence, Réhault-Godbert, Sophie, Gautron, Joël, Le Bihan-Duval, Elisabeth, Mignon-Grasteau, Sandrine, Berri, Cécile, Guettier, Elodie, Baéza, Elisabeth, Chartrin, Pascal, Bordeau, Thierry, Raynaud, Emilie, Couroussé, Nathalie, Cailleau-Audouin, Estelle, Crochet, Sabine, Tourneur, Léa, Guichaoua, Adrien, van den Brand, Henry, Castellini, Cesare, Reverchon, Maxime, Sourdioux, Michel, Akakpo, Roland, Rangel Pedersen, Ninfa, Schepens, Rene, Almind, Maria, Grenier, Katia, Dubuc, David, Le Lann, Marie-Véronique, Ponzio, Raffaella, Mainardi, Marina, Accotto, Caterina, Coletta, Monica, Guesdon, Vanessa, Leruste, Hélène, Billiard, Bérangère, Ferreira, Vitor Hugo Bessa, Baldinger, Lisa, Pluschke, Helen, Delanoue, Elsa, Laura, Warin, Pertusa, Marion, Stomp, Mathilde, Travel, Angelique, Bouvarel, Isabelle, Germain, Karine, Ravon, Laure, Calandreau, Ludovic, Labas, Valérie, Prunier, Armelle, Merlot, Elodie, Tallet, Céline, Perruchot, Marie-Hélène, Louveau, Isabelle, van Milgen, Jaap, Dessauge, Frederic, Clouard, Caroline, Lebret, Bénédicte, Montagne, Lucile, Faure, Justine, Zuliani, Anna, Venezia, Pietro, Canario, Laurianne, Ferchaud, Stéphane, Cozma, Vasile, Spinu, Marina, Horia Bǎieş, Mihai, Courboulay, Valérie, Roguet, Christine, Gaudré, Didier, Chevillon, Patrick, Alibert, Laurent, Decruyenaere, Virginie, Wavreille, José, Vanggaard, Pia, Vanggaard, Jan, Micheloni, Cristina, Thobe, Petra, Lombard, Sarah, Caillaud, Laura, Bernardet, Nelly, Collet, Julie, Molenaar, Roos, Mattioli, Simona, Hill, Nigel, Cadudal, François, Quentin, Maxime, Leterrier, Christine, Teixeira-Gomes, Ana-Paula, Uzbekova, Svetlana, Maugrion, Emilie, Rocchi, Lucia, Biologie des Oiseaux et Aviculture (BOA), Université de Tours (UT)-Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement (INRAE), Università degli Studi di Perugia = University of Perugia (UNIPG), Associazione Italiana per l'Agricoltura Biologica (AIAB), Scuela Santa Anna (SSSA), Scuola Universitaria Superiore Sant'Anna [Pisa] (SSSUP), BioForum Vlaanderen, Natural Resources Institute Finland (LUKE), Research Institute for Agricultural, Fisheries and Food (ILVO), Utrecht University [Utrecht], Institut Technique de l'Agriculture Biologique (ITAB), Aarhus University [Aarhus], Thuenen Institute of Farm Economics, European Association for Animal Production (EAAP), Les instituts techniques agricoles (Acta), Wageningen University and Research [Wageningen] (WUR), Syndicat des Sélectionneurs Avicoles et Aquacoles Français (SYSAAF), Fermentation Experts, Équipe Micro et nanosystèmes HyperFréquences Fluidiques (LAAS-MH2F), Laboratoire d'analyse et d'architecture des systèmes (LAAS), Université Toulouse Capitole (UT Capitole), Université de Toulouse (UT)-Université de Toulouse (UT)-Institut National des Sciences Appliquées - Toulouse (INSA Toulouse), Institut National des Sciences Appliquées (INSA)-Université de Toulouse (UT)-Institut National des Sciences Appliquées (INSA)-Université Toulouse - Jean Jaurès (UT2J), Université de Toulouse (UT)-Université Toulouse III - Paul Sabatier (UT3), Université de Toulouse (UT)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Institut National Polytechnique (Toulouse) (Toulouse INP), Université de Toulouse (UT)-Université Toulouse Capitole (UT Capitole), Université de Toulouse (UT), Équipe DIagnostic, Supervision et COnduite (LAAS-DISCO), Slow Food Biodiversity, JUNIA (JUNIA), Université catholique de Lille (UCL), Thuenen-Institute of Organic Farming, ITAVI, Elevage Alternatif et Santé des Monogastriques (UE EASM), Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement (INRAE), Physiologie de la reproduction et des comportements [Nouzilly] (PRC), Institut Français du Cheval et de l'Equitation [Saumur] (IFCE)-Université de Tours (UT)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement (INRAE), Physiologie, Environnement et Génétique pour l'Animal et les Systèmes d'Elevage [Rennes] (PEGASE), Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement (INRAE)-INSTITUT AGRO Agrocampus Ouest, Institut national d'enseignement supérieur pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement (Institut Agro)-Institut national d'enseignement supérieur pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement (Institut Agro), SIVtro VSF Italia, Génétique Physiologie et Systèmes d'Elevage (GenPhySE ), Ecole Nationale Vétérinaire de Toulouse (ENVT), Institut National Polytechnique (Toulouse) (Toulouse INP), Université de Toulouse (UT)-Université de Toulouse (UT)-Institut National Polytechnique (Toulouse) (Toulouse INP), Université de Toulouse (UT)-Université de Toulouse (UT)-École nationale supérieure agronomique de Toulouse (ENSAT), Université de Toulouse (UT)-Université de Toulouse (UT)-Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement (INRAE), Unité Expérimentale Elevages Porcins Innovants (GenESI), USAMV Cluj-Napoca, Institut du Porc (IFIP), Centre Wallon de Recherches Agronomiques (CRA-W), Vanggaard Staldmontage, Harper Adams University, EAAP, PPILOW, and European Project: 816172,H2020-EU.3.2.1.1. - Increasing production efficiency and coping with climate change, while ensuring sustainability and resilience ,PPILOW (2019)
- Subjects
[SDV.SA]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Agricultural sciences ,[SCCO]Cognitive science ,[SDV.GEN]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Genetics ,[SDV.BA]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Animal biology ,[SDV.BDD]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Development Biology ,[SHS]Humanities and Social Sciences - Abstract
International audience; The PPILOW project aims to co-construct innovations to improve Poultry and Pig Welfare in Low-input outdoor and Organic farming systems through a multi-actor approach. PPILOW implements a participatory approach for proposing and studying welfare-improvement levers. It will provide a combination of practical solutions that can be applied at a pan-European level with specific adjustments depending on citizen’s expectations and the target market. The multi-actor approach consists in involving end-users including farmers, breeding companies, feed producers, consumer associations, retailers, advisers, processors, and scientists in National Practitioner Groups (NPG) in six participating countries. PPILOW partners facilitate the groups by connecting NPG at European level, transferring scientific information, interacting with partners engaged in animal experiments, and co-creating innovations rising from NPG-specific demands. They co-build with PPILOW partners welfare self-assessment tools (development of the PIGLOW app for pigs and refinement of the EBENE® app for poultry), and innovative breeding, feeding, and rearing strategies and techniques to improve the welfare of animals. They co-design protocols, test innovations on farm, and disseminate the results. In turn, they receive insights on methods and scientific results, and inputs from other NPG reinforcing the value of the expected outcomes. Approaches focus on avoiding physical damage and the elimination of layer male chicks, on reducing boar taint of intact male pigs, promoting positive behaviours, animal health, and robustness through field studies with pigs and poultry. Multicriteria analyses of the most effective levers of welfare improvement will be performed to evaluate their economic, social, and environmental impacts based on the ‘One Welfare’ concept; economic and business models will also be developed. To ensure the rapid uptake of the project results by end-users, the close involvement of PPILOW’s NPG throughout the EU will ensure disseminationactivities and the facilitation of change. The PPILOW project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme under grant agreement N°816172. www.ppilow.eu.
- Published
- 2022
7. Perceptions and expectations of practitioners and citizens towards welfare in poultry low input outdoor and organic production systems
- Author
-
Niemi, Jarkko, Parrott, Patricia, Leterrier, Christine, Bonnefous, Claire, Collin, Anne, Pertusa, Marion, Warin, Laura, Lähtinen, Katja, Heinola, Katriina, Spinu, Marina, Delanoue, Elsa, Re, Martina, Ponzio, Raffaella, Venezia, Pietro, Walley, Keith, Natural Resources Institute Finland (LUKE), Harper Adams University, Physiologie de la reproduction et des comportements [Nouzilly] (PRC), Institut Français du Cheval et de l'Equitation [Saumur] (IFCE)-Université de Tours (UT)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement (INRAE), Biologie des Oiseaux et Aviculture (BOA), Université de Tours (UT)-Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement (INRAE), ITAVI, USAMV Cluj-Napoca, Institut de l'élevage (IDELE), Associazione Italiana per l'Agricoltura Biologica (AIAB), Slow Food Biodiversity, SIVtro VSF Italia, WPSA, and European Project: 816172,H2020-EU.3.2.1.1. - Increasing production efficiency and coping with climate change, while ensuring sustainability and resilience ,PPILOW (2019)
- Subjects
[SHS]Humanities and Social Sciences - Abstract
International audience
- Published
- 2022
8. Low-input outdoor and organic poultry productions: how to improve animal welfare in these systems ?
- Author
-
Bonnefous, Claire, Collin, Anne, Niemi, Jarkko, Väre, Minna, Parrott, Patricia, Walley, Keith, Re, Martina, Ponzio, Raffaella, Zuliani, Anna, Bas Rodenburg, T., Guesdon, Vanessa, Delanoue, Elsa, Roinsard, Antoine, Warin, Laura, Leterrier, Christine, Biologie des Oiseaux et Aviculture (BOA), Université de Tours (UT)-Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement (INRAE), Natural Resources Institute Finland (LUKE), Harper Adams University, Associazione Italiana per l'Agricoltura Biologica (AIAB), Scuela Santa Anna (SSSA), Scuola Universitaria Superiore Sant'Anna [Pisa] (SSSUP), Slow Food Biodiversity, Veterinari Senza Frontiere Italia, Sede c/o Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale delle Venezie viale dell'Università, Utrecht University [Utrecht], JUNIA (JUNIA), Université catholique de Lille (UCL), Institut de l'élevage (IDELE), Institut Technique de l'Agriculture Biologique (ITAB), ITAVI, Physiologie de la reproduction et des comportements [Nouzilly] (PRC), Institut Français du Cheval et de l'Equitation [Saumur] (IFCE)-Université de Tours (UT)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement (INRAE), This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No 816172, and European Project: 816172,H2020-EU.3.2.1.1. - Increasing production efficiency and coping with climate change, while ensuring sustainability and resilience ,PPILOW (2019)
- Subjects
welfare ,[SCCO]Cognitive science ,poultry ,organic ,practices ,[SDV]Life Sciences [q-bio] ,[SHS.PSY]Humanities and Social Sciences/Psychology ,low-input outdoor - Abstract
International audience
- Published
- 2022
9. Welfare issues and potential solutions for laying hens in free range and organic production systems: A review based on literature and interviews
- Author
-
Bonnefous, Claire, primary, Collin, Anne, additional, Guilloteau, Laurence A., additional, Guesdon, Vanessa, additional, Filliat, Christine, additional, Réhault-Godbert, Sophie, additional, Rodenburg, T. Bas, additional, Tuyttens, Frank A. M., additional, Warin, Laura, additional, Steenfeldt, Sanna, additional, Baldinger, Lisa, additional, Re, Martina, additional, Ponzio, Raffaella, additional, Zuliani, Anna, additional, Venezia, Pietro, additional, Väre, Minna, additional, Parrott, Patricia, additional, Walley, Keith, additional, Niemi, Jarkko K., additional, and Leterrier, Christine, additional
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
10. Blood concentrations of pituitary hormones in first-episode, drug-naïve psychosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- Author
-
Cavaleri, Daniele, Bartoli, Francesco, Capogrosso, Chiara, Guzzi, Pierluca, Bernasconi, Gianna, Re, Martina, Crocamo, Cristina, Carrà, Giuseppe, and Misiak, Blazej
- Subjects
Mental and Social Health ,Medicine and Health Sciences ,Psychiatric and Mental Health ,#pituitary ,#first-episode psychosis ,#systematic review ,#meta-analysis - Abstract
Several abnormalities in pituitary functionality have been described in subjects with first episode, drug-naïve psychosis. Research has reported inconsistent and conflicting findings so far, and no systematic synthesis of the existing evidence is available. We will conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies investigating blood concentrations of anterior pituitary hormones – namely adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH), follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) and luteinizing hormone (LH), growth hormone (GH), prolactin (PRL), and thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) – in drug-naïve (or minimally treated) individuals with first-episode psychosis (FEP) as compared with those of healthy controls (HCs).
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
11. Barriers and levers of enhancing animal welfare in organic and low-input outdoor production: Insights from a supply chain survey
- Author
-
Väre, Minna, Lähtinen, Katja, Heinola, Katriina, Mikkola, Jarmo, Parrott, Patricia, Bonnefous, Claire, van Vooren, Laura, Kliphuis, Saskia, Zuliani, Anna, Ponzio, Raffaella, Warin, Laura, Herremans, Sophie, Baldinger, Lisa, Coletta, Monica, Re, Martina, Roguet, Christine, Spinu, Marina, Rangel Pedersen, Ninfa, Collin, Anne, Niemi, Jarkko, Natural Resources Institute Finland (LUKE), Harper Adams University, Biologie des Oiseaux et Aviculture (BOA), Université de Tours (UT)-Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement (INRAE), BioForum Vlaanderen, Utrecht University [Utrecht], SIVtro VSF Italia, Slow Food Biodiversity, ITAVI, Centre Wallon de Recherches Agronomiques (CRA-W), Thuenen-Institute of Organic Farming, Associazione Italiana per l'Agricoltura Biologica (AIAB), Institut du Porc (IFIP), USAMV Cluj-Napoca, Fermentation Experts, The PPILOW project as received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No 816172, PPILOW, and European Project: 816172,H2020-EU.3.2.1.1. - Increasing production efficiency and coping with climate change, while ensuring sustainability and resilience ,PPILOW (2019)
- Subjects
[SDV.SA]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Agricultural sciences ,pig ,free range ,poultry ,Artikkelit ,measure ,market incentive ,[SHS]Humanities and Social Sciences - Abstract
Animal welfare is an essential part of the sustainability of animal production. While low-input farming, such as organic animal production, is often considered animal-friendly, several ways to enhance animal welfare in low-input animal production exist. However, currently there is little information on how farmers and other supply chain actors view different innovations and tools which may influence animal welfare in low-input outdoor and organic production systems. The aim of this study was to examine farmers’ and experts’ reactions to new approaches to pig and poultry production, with special attention to their animal welfare-related measures. The reactions were tested formally in by using a quantitative survey instrument in nine European countries (Finland, UK, France, Denmark, the Netherlands, Belgium, Germany, Italy, Romania). In the survey, respondents’ views on production practices and novel measures were asked. These included aspects such as applicability and advantages and disadvantages of various measures such as avoiding mutilations, using dual-purpose or local breeds, or in-ovo sexing. The data included altogether 218 responses from nine countries. Differences between countries were tested and groups of respondents were identified. The results suggest that supply side stakeholders foresee the welfare benefits and some disadvantages of welfare improving measures proposed to them. However, they also indicate that several measures were considered inapplicable despite their benefits. Inadequate financial provisions to adopt a measure was considered as one of the most important reasons for inapplicability of a measure. This may imply either high costs of implementing measures of low market incentives or perceived low demand for animal-friendly products. Other barriers for adopting welfare-friendly measures included farm-specific factors such as limitations imposed by housing. The respondents indicated a high relative preference for feeding, breeding, shelter from predators and the use of vaccines and anti-parasitic treatments to the provision of enrichments and nesting material to pigs, and to mutilations. Farmers agreed that environmental enrichments are important welfare-improving levers and preferred their use in low-input pig and poultry production. Animal breeding-related measures in pig production were perceived quite favorably by supply side stakeholders. Despite their welfare benefits, farmers in some countries had quite high preference towards maintaining castration and tail docking in pig and beak trimming in broiler production as part of their production method.
- Published
- 2022
12. Understanding technical, ethical & socio-economic barriers and levers for improving poultry and pig welfare in low-input and organic farming systems
- Author
-
Niemi, Jarkko, Tuyttens, Frank A.M., Rocchi, Lucia, Väre, Minna, Lähtinen, Katja, Heinola, Katriina, Mikkola, Jarmo, Parrott, Patricia, van Vooren, Laura, Kliphuis, Saskia, Baldinger, Lisa, Thobe, Petra, Almadani Mohamad, Isam, Zuliani, Anna, Coletta, Monica, Ponzio, Raffaella, Accotto, Caterina, Alibert, Laurent, Roguet, Christine, Delanoue, Elsa, Cozma, Vasile, Spinu, Marina, Warin, Laura, Re, Martina, Herremans, Sophie, Rangel Pedersen, Ninfa, Steenfeldt, Sanna, Bonnefous, Claire, Collin, Anne, Natural Resources Institute Finland (LUKE), Research Institute for Agricultural, Fisheries and Food (ILVO), Università degli Studi di Perugia = University of Perugia (UNIPG), Harper Adams University, BioForum Vlaanderen, Utrecht University [Utrecht], Thuenen-Institute of Organic Farming, Thuenen Institute of Farm Economics, SIVtro VSF Italia, Associazione Italiana per l'Agricoltura Biologica (AIAB), Slow Food Italy, Slow Food International, Institut du Porc (IFIP), Institut de l'élevage (IDELE), USAMV Cluj-Napoca, ITAVI, Centre Wallon de Recherches Agronomiques (CRA-W), Fermentation Experts, Aarhus University [Aarhus], Biologie des Oiseaux et Aviculture (BOA), Université de Tours (UT)-Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement (INRAE), and European Project: 816172,H2020-EU.3.2.1.1. - Increasing production efficiency and coping with climate change, while ensuring sustainability and resilience ,PPILOW (2019)
- Subjects
[SHS]Humanities and Social Sciences - Abstract
International audience
- Published
- 2022
13. Stakeholder and consumer views towards animal welfare-enhancing practices in organic pig and poultry production: insights from the PPILOW survey
- Author
-
Niemi, Jarkko, Väre, Minna, Lähtinen, Katja, Heinola, Katriina, Mikkola, Jarmo, Parrott, Patricia, van Vooren, Laura, Kliphuis, Saskia, Baldinger, Lisa, Thobe, Petra, Zuliani, Anna, Coletta, Monica, Ponzio, Raffaella, Accotto, Caterina, Alibert, Laurent, Roguet, Christine, Delanoue, Elsa, Cozma, Vasile, Spinu, Marina, Warin, Laura, Re, Martina, Herremans, Sophie, Rangel Pedersen, Ninfa, Steenfeldt, Sanna, Bonnefous, Claire, Collin, Anne, Natural Resources Institute Finland (LUKE), Harper Adams University, BioForum Vlaanderen, Utrecht University [Utrecht], Thuenen-Institute of Organic Farming, Thuenen Institute of Farm Economics, SIVtro VSF Italia, Associazione Italiana per l'Agricoltura Biologica (AIAB), Slow Food Italy, Slow Food International, Institut du Porc (IFIP), Institut de l'élevage (IDELE), USAMV Cluj-Napoca, ITAVI, Centre Wallon de Recherches Agronomiques (CRA-W), Fermentation Experts, Aarhus University [Aarhus], Biologie des Oiseaux et Aviculture (BOA), Université de Tours (UT)-Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement (INRAE), and European Project: 816172,H2020-EU.3.2.1.1. - Increasing production efficiency and coping with climate change, while ensuring sustainability and resilience ,PPILOW (2019)
- Subjects
[SHS]Humanities and Social Sciences - Abstract
International audience
- Published
- 2022
14. Welfare issues and potential solutions for laying hens in free range and organic production systems: A review based on literature and interviews
- Author
-
Bonnefous, Claire, Collin, Anne, Guilloteau, Laurence A, Guesdon, Vanessa, Filliat, Christine, Réhault-Godbert, Sophie, Rodenburg, T Bas, Tuyttens, Frank A M, Warin, Laura, Steenfeldt, Sanna, Baldinger, Lisa, Re, Martina, Ponzio, Raffaella, Zuliani, Anna, Venezia, Pietro, Väre, Minna, Parrott, Patricia, Walley, Keith, Niemi, Jarkko K, Leterrier, Christine, Bonnefous, Claire, Collin, Anne, Guilloteau, Laurence A, Guesdon, Vanessa, Filliat, Christine, Réhault-Godbert, Sophie, Rodenburg, T Bas, Tuyttens, Frank A M, Warin, Laura, Steenfeldt, Sanna, Baldinger, Lisa, Re, Martina, Ponzio, Raffaella, Zuliani, Anna, Venezia, Pietro, Väre, Minna, Parrott, Patricia, Walley, Keith, Niemi, Jarkko K, and Leterrier, Christine
- Abstract
In free-range and organic production systems, hens can make choices according to their needs and desires, which is in accordance with welfare definitions. Nonetheless, health and behavioral problems are also encountered in these systems. The aim of this article was to identify welfare challenges observed in these production systems in the EU and the most promising solutions to overcome these challenges. It is based on a review of published literature and research projects complemented by interviews with experts. We selected EU specific information for welfare problems, however, the selected literature regarding solutions is global. Free range use may increase the risk of infection by some bacteria, viruses and parasites. Preventive methods include avoiding contamination thanks to biosecurity measures and strengthening animals' natural defenses against these diseases which can be based on nutritional means with new diet components such as insect-derived products, probiotics and prebiotics. Phytotherapy and aromatherapy can be used as preventive and curative medicine and vaccines as alternatives to antibiotics and pesticides. Bone quality in pullets and hens prevents keel deviations and is favored by exercise in the outdoor range. Free range use also lead to higher exposure to variable weather conditions and predators, therefore shadow, fences and guard animals can be used to prevent heat stress and predation respectively. Granting a free range provides opportunities for the expression of many behaviors and yet many hens usually stay close to the house. Providing the birds with trees, shelters or attractive plants can increase range use. Small flock sizes, early experiences of enrichment and personality traits have also been found to enhance range use. Severe feather pecking can occur in free range production systems, although flocks using the outdoor area have better plumage than indoors. While many prevention strategies are facilitated in free range systems, the
- Published
- 2022
15. Welfare issues and potential solutions for laying hens in free range and organic production systems: A review based on literature and interviews
- Author
-
AISS Animal Welfare, Bonnefous, Claire, Collin, Anne, Guilloteau, Laurence A, Guesdon, Vanessa, Filliat, Christine, Réhault-Godbert, Sophie, Rodenburg, T Bas, Tuyttens, Frank A M, Warin, Laura, Steenfeldt, Sanna, Baldinger, Lisa, Re, Martina, Ponzio, Raffaella, Zuliani, Anna, Venezia, Pietro, Väre, Minna, Parrott, Patricia, Walley, Keith, Niemi, Jarkko K, Leterrier, Christine, AISS Animal Welfare, Bonnefous, Claire, Collin, Anne, Guilloteau, Laurence A, Guesdon, Vanessa, Filliat, Christine, Réhault-Godbert, Sophie, Rodenburg, T Bas, Tuyttens, Frank A M, Warin, Laura, Steenfeldt, Sanna, Baldinger, Lisa, Re, Martina, Ponzio, Raffaella, Zuliani, Anna, Venezia, Pietro, Väre, Minna, Parrott, Patricia, Walley, Keith, Niemi, Jarkko K, and Leterrier, Christine
- Published
- 2022
16. PPILOW Deliverable 1.3 - Characterisation of reactions of the general public and farming sector to new approaches to organic and low-input pig and poultry production
- Author
-
Niemi, Jarkko, Väre, Minna, Lähtinen, Katja, Heinola, Katriina, Mikkola, Jarmo, Parrott, Patricia, van Vooren, Laura, Kliphuis, Saskia, Baldinger, Lisa, Thobe, Petra, Zuliani, Anna, Coletta, Monica, Ponzio, Raffaella, Accotto, Caterina, Alibert, Laurent, Roguet, Christine, Delanoue, Elsa, Cozma, Vasile, Spinu, Marina, Warin, Laura, Re, Martina, Herremans, Sophie, Rangel Pedersen, Ninfa, Steenfeldt, Sanna, Bonnefous, Claire, Collin, Anne, Natural Resources Institute Finland (LUKE), Harper Adams University, BioForum Vlaanderen, Utrecht University [Utrecht], Thuenen-Institute of Organic Farming, Thuenen Institute of Farm Economics, SIVtro VSF Italia, Associazione Italiana per l'Agricoltura Biologica (AIAB), Slow Food Biodiversity, Institut du Porc (IFIP), Institut de l'élevage (IDELE), ITAVI, USAMV Cluj-Napoca, Scuela Santa Anna (SSSA), Scuola Universitaria Superiore Sant'Anna [Pisa] (SSSUP), Centre Wallon de Recherches Agronomiques (CRA-W), Fermentation Experts, Aarhus University [Aarhus], Biologie des Oiseaux et Aviculture (BOA), Université de Tours (UT)-Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement (INRAE), The PPILOW project as received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No 816172, LUKE, PPILOW, and European Project: 816172,H2020-EU.3.2.1.1. - Increasing production efficiency and coping with climate change, while ensuring sustainability and resilience ,PPILOW (2019)
- Subjects
[SHS]Humanities and Social Sciences - Published
- 2021
17. Workshop#3 How to improve poultry and pig welfare in organic production systems?
- Author
-
Collin, Anne, Re, Martina, Micheloni, Cristina, Biologie des Oiseaux et Aviculture (BOA), Université de Tours (UT)-Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement (INRAE), Associazione Italiana per l'Agricoltura Biologica (AIAB), Scuela Santa Anna (SSSA), Scuola Universitaria Superiore Sant'Anna [Pisa] (SSSUP), This project has received funding from the European Union Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement N°816172, PPILOW, and European Project: 816172,H2020-EU.3.2.1.1. - Increasing production efficiency and coping with climate change, while ensuring sustainability and resilience ,PPILOW (2019)
- Subjects
[SDV.SA]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Agricultural sciences ,[SDV.GEN]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Genetics ,[SCCO]Cognitive science ,[SDV.BA]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Animal biology ,[SDV.BDLR]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Reproductive Biology ,[SDV.AEN]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Food and Nutrition ,[SDV.BDD]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Development Biology ,ComputingMilieux_MISCELLANEOUS ,[SHS]Humanities and Social Sciences - Abstract
International audience
- Published
- 2021
18. Organic pig and poultry production: what are the animal welfare challenges?
- Author
-
Bonnefous, Claire, Collin, Anne, Niemi, Jarkko, Väre, Minna, Parrott, Patricia, Walley, Keith, Re, Martina, Ponzio, Raffaella, Rodenburg, T. Bas, Tallet, Céline, Merlot, Elodie, Montagne, Lucile, Faure, Justine, Guilloteau, Laurence, Guesdon, Vanessa, Leruste, Hélène, Delanoue, Elsa, Alibert, Laurent, Roinsard, Antoine, Warin, Laura, Leterrier, Christine, Biologie des Oiseaux et Aviculture (BOA), Université de Tours (UT)-Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement (INRAE), Natural Resources Institute Finland (LUKE), Harper Adams University, Associazione Italiana per l'Agricoltura Biologica (AIAB), Scuela Santa Anna (SSSA), Scuola Universitaria Superiore Sant'Anna [Pisa] (SSSUP), Slow Food Biodiversity, Utrecht University [Utrecht], Physiologie, Environnement et Génétique pour l'Animal et les Systèmes d'Elevage [Rennes] (PEGASE), Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement (INRAE)-Institut Agro Rennes Angers, Institut national d'enseignement supérieur pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement (Institut Agro)-Institut national d'enseignement supérieur pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement (Institut Agro), Physiologie de la reproduction et des comportements [Nouzilly] (PRC), Institut Français du Cheval et de l'Equitation [Saumur] (IFCE)-Université de Tours (UT)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement (INRAE), JUNIA (JUNIA), Université catholique de Lille (UCL), Institut de l'élevage (IDELE), Institut du Porc (IFIP), Institut Technique de l'Agriculture Biologique (ITAB), ITAVI, This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No 816172, and European Project: 816172,H2020-EU.3.2.1.1. - Increasing production efficiency and coping with climate change, while ensuring sustainability and resilience ,PPILOW (2019)
- Subjects
[SCCO]Cognitive science ,[SHS.SOCIO]Humanities and Social Sciences/Sociology ,[SDV]Life Sciences [q-bio] ,Animal husbandry ,Farming Systems - Abstract
International audience; Although organic animal production is based on farming systems that enable a high degree of expression of natural behaviour by the animals, there are still some welfare challenges in such systems. Our study provides a state of the art of practices that could improve animal welfare in organic productions and interviews with key informants have been conducted to identify gaps and opportunities for animal welfare. This study provides a shortlist of practices that could be used to improve animal welfare while taking into account farmer wellbeing and sustainability and so contributing to “One Welfare”.
- Published
- 2021
19. The multi-actor PPILOW European project: a participative approach to co-build innovations for welfare improvement in organic pig and poultry farms
- Author
-
Micheloni, Cristina, Jamart, An, Re, Martina, van Vooren, Laura, Niemi, Jarkko, Tuyttens, Frank A.M., Rodenburg, Tb (bas), Roinsard, Antoine, Steenfeldt, Sanna, Thobe, Petra, Carelli, Riccardo, Sciarretta, Marlene, Bonnefous, Claire, Bodin, Pauline, Rosati, Andrea, van den Brand, Henry, Rocchi, Lucia, Reverchon, Maxime, Decruyenaere, Virginie, Wavreille, José, Grete, Brunsgaard, Depraetere, Stefaan, Grenier, Katia, Vanggaard, Jan, Ponzio, Raffaella, Guesdon, Vanessa, Leruste, Hélène, Walley, Keith, Cozma, Vasile, Le Bihan-Duval, Elisabeth, Engberg, Ricarda M., Réhault-Godbert, Sophie, Baldinger, Lisa, Thys, Mirjan, Prunier, Armelle, Merlot, Elodie, Tallet, Céline, Montagne, Lucile, Canario, Laurianne, Delanoue, Elsa, Courboulay, Valérie, Hercule, Jonathan, Leterrier, Christine, Latchoumia, Joselle, Laura, Warin, Collin, Anne, Associazione Italiana per l'Agricoltura Biologica (AIAB), BioForum Vlaanderen, Scuela Santa Anna (SSSA), Scuola Universitaria Superiore Sant'Anna [Pisa] (SSSUP), Natural Resources Institute Finland (LUKE), Research Institute for Agricultural, Fisheries and Food (ILVO), Utrecht University [Utrecht], Institut Technique de l'Agriculture Biologique (ITAB), Aarhus University [Aarhus], Thuenen Institute of Farm Economics, European Association for Animal Production (EAAP), Biologie des Oiseaux et Aviculture (BOA), Université de Tours (UT)-Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement (INRAE), Les instituts techniques agricoles (Acta), Wageningen University and Research [Wageningen] (WUR), Università degli Studi di Perugia = University of Perugia (UNIPG), Syndicat des Sélectionneurs Avicoles et Aquacoles Français (SYSAAF), Centre Wallon de Recherches Agronomiques (CRA-W), Fermentation Experts, Circular Organics, Équipe Micro et nanosystèmes HyperFréquences Fluidiques (LAAS-MH2F), Laboratoire d'analyse et d'architecture des systèmes (LAAS), Université Toulouse Capitole (UT Capitole), Université de Toulouse (UT)-Université de Toulouse (UT)-Institut National des Sciences Appliquées - Toulouse (INSA Toulouse), Institut National des Sciences Appliquées (INSA)-Université de Toulouse (UT)-Institut National des Sciences Appliquées (INSA)-Université Toulouse - Jean Jaurès (UT2J), Université de Toulouse (UT)-Université Toulouse III - Paul Sabatier (UT3), Université de Toulouse (UT)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Institut National Polytechnique (Toulouse) (Toulouse INP), Université de Toulouse (UT)-Université Toulouse Capitole (UT Capitole), Université de Toulouse (UT), Vanggaard Staldmontage, Slow Food Biodiversity, JUNIA (JUNIA), Université catholique de Lille (UCL), Harper Adams University, USAMV Cluj-Napoca, Thuenen-Institute of Organic Farming, Physiologie, Environnement et Génétique pour l'Animal et les Systèmes d'Elevage [Rennes] (PEGASE), Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement (INRAE)-INSTITUT AGRO Agrocampus Ouest, Institut national d'enseignement supérieur pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement (Institut Agro)-Institut national d'enseignement supérieur pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement (Institut Agro), Génétique Physiologie et Systèmes d'Elevage (GenPhySE ), Ecole Nationale Vétérinaire de Toulouse (ENVT), Institut National Polytechnique (Toulouse) (Toulouse INP), Université de Toulouse (UT)-Université de Toulouse (UT)-Institut National Polytechnique (Toulouse) (Toulouse INP), Université de Toulouse (UT)-Université de Toulouse (UT)-École nationale supérieure agronomique de Toulouse (ENSAT), Université de Toulouse (UT)-Université de Toulouse (UT)-Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement (INRAE), Institut de l'élevage (IDELE), Institut du Porc (IFIP), ITAVI, Physiologie de la reproduction et des comportements [Nouzilly] (PRC), Institut Français du Cheval et de l'Equitation [Saumur] (IFCE)-Université de Tours (UT)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement (INRAE), INRAE Transfert, The PPILOW project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme under grant agreement N°816172., IFOAM, PPILOW, and European Project: 816172,H2020-EU.3.2.1.1. - Increasing production efficiency and coping with climate change, while ensuring sustainability and resilience ,PPILOW (2019)
- Subjects
[SDV.SA]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Agricultural sciences ,[SDV.GEN]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Genetics ,[SCCO]Cognitive science ,[SDV.BA]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Animal biology ,[SDV.BBM]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Biochemistry, Molecular Biology ,[SDV.BDLR]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Reproductive Biology ,[SDV.AEN]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Food and Nutrition ,[SDV.BDD]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Development Biology ,ComputingMilieux_MISCELLANEOUS ,[SHS]Humanities and Social Sciences - Abstract
International audience
- Published
- 2021
20. PPILOW 1st technical report. Part B
- Author
-
Collin, Anne, Niemi, Jarkko, Leterrier, Christine, Walley, Keith, Thobe, Petra, Micheloni, Cristina, Re, Martina, Tuyttens, Frank A.M., Warin, Laura, Rocchi, Lucia, Bas Rodenburg, T., Prunier, Armelle, Roinsard, Antoine, Baldinger, Lisa, Réhault-Godbert, Sophie, Steenfeldt, Sanna, Le Bihan-Duval, Elisabeth, van den Brand, Henry, Engberg, Ricarda M., Canario, Laurianne, Castellini, Cesare, Hercule, Jonathan, Carelli, Riccardo, Sciarretta, Marlene, Lagendijk, Emmanuelle, Vermue, Anthony, Biologie des Oiseaux et Aviculture (BOA), Université de Tours (UT)-Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement (INRAE), Natural Resources Institute Finland (LUKE), Physiologie de la reproduction et des comportements [Nouzilly] (PRC), Institut Français du Cheval et de l'Equitation [Saumur] (IFCE)-Université de Tours (UT)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement (INRAE), Harper Adams University, Thuenen Institute of Farm Economics, Associazione Italiana per l'Agricoltura Biologica (AIAB), Scuela Santa Anna (SSSA), Scuola Universitaria Superiore Sant'Anna [Pisa] (SSSUP), Research Institute for Agricultural, Fisheries and Food (ILVO), ITAVI, Università degli Studi di Perugia = University of Perugia (UNIPG), Utrecht University [Utrecht], Physiologie, Environnement et Génétique pour l'Animal et les Systèmes d'Elevage [Rennes] (PEGASE), Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement (INRAE)-Institut Agro Rennes Angers, Institut national d'enseignement supérieur pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement (Institut Agro)-Institut national d'enseignement supérieur pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement (Institut Agro), Institut Technique de l'Agriculture Biologique (ITAB), Thuenen-Institute of Organic Farming, Aarhus University [Aarhus], Wageningen University and Research [Wageningen] (WUR), Génétique Physiologie et Systèmes d'Elevage (GenPhySE ), Ecole Nationale Vétérinaire de Toulouse (ENVT), Institut National Polytechnique (Toulouse) (Toulouse INP), Université de Toulouse (UT)-Université de Toulouse (UT)-Institut National Polytechnique (Toulouse) (Toulouse INP), Université de Toulouse (UT)-Université de Toulouse (UT)-École nationale supérieure agronomique de Toulouse (ENSAT), Université de Toulouse (UT)-Université de Toulouse (UT)-Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement (INRAE), European Association for Animal Production (EAAP), INRAE Transfert, The project PPILOW has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement N°816172, INRAE, PPILOW, and European Project: 816172,H2020-EU.3.2.1.1. - Increasing production efficiency and coping with climate change, while ensuring sustainability and resilience ,PPILOW (2019)
- Subjects
[SDV.SA]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Agricultural sciences ,[SCCO]Cognitive science ,[SDV.GEN]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Genetics ,[SDV.BA]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Animal biology ,[SDV.BBM]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Biochemistry, Molecular Biology ,[SDV.BDLR]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Reproductive Biology ,[SDV.BC]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Cellular Biology ,[SDV.AEN]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Food and Nutrition ,[SDV.BDD]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Development Biology ,[SDV.BIBS]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Quantitative Methods [q-bio.QM] ,[SHS]Humanities and Social Sciences - Published
- 2021
21. One Welfare for farm animals and humans: practitioners’ and citizens’ expectations
- Author
-
Collin, Anne, Bonnefous, Claire, Leterrier, Christine, Tallet, Céline, Merlot, Elodie, Montagne, Lucile, Walley, Keith, Parrott, Tricia, Allan, Shelley, Castellini, Cesare, Meloni, Giudita, Rocchi, Lucia, Thobe, Petra, Almadani Mohamad, Isam, Warin, Laura, Pertusa, Marion, Hercule, Jonathan, Roguet, Christine, Delanoue, Elsa, Re, Martina, Micheloni, Cristina, Coletta, Monica, Accotto, Caterina, van Vooren, Laura, Jamart, An, Ponzio, Raffaella, Zuliani, Anna, Venezia, Pietro, Herremans, Sophie, Decruyenaere, Virginie, Cozma, Vasile, Spinu, Marina, Tuyttens, Frank A.M., Thys, Mirjan, Graat, Evelien, Rodenburg, T Bas, Kliphuis, Saskia, Giersberg, Mona, Väre, Minna, Lähtinen, Katja, Heinola, Katriina, Niemi, Jarkko, Biologie des Oiseaux et Aviculture (BOA), Université de Tours (UT)-Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement (INRAE), Physiologie de la reproduction et des comportements [Nouzilly] (PRC), Institut Français du Cheval et de l'Equitation [Saumur] (IFCE)-Université de Tours (UT)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement (INRAE), Physiologie, Environnement et Génétique pour l'Animal et les Systèmes d'Elevage [Rennes] (PEGASE), Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement (INRAE)-INSTITUT AGRO Agrocampus Ouest, Institut national d'enseignement supérieur pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement (Institut Agro)-Institut national d'enseignement supérieur pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement (Institut Agro), Harper Adams University, Università degli Studi di Perugia = University of Perugia (UNIPG), Thuenen Institute of Farm Economics, ITAVI, Institut du Porc (IFIP), Institut de l'élevage (IDELE), Italian Association for Organic Agriculture (AIAB-FVG), Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna (SSSA), BioForum Vlaanderen, Slow Food Biodiversity, SIVtro VSF Italia, Centre Wallon de Recherches Agronomiques (CRA-W), USAMV Cluj-Napoca, USAMV cluj-Napoca, Research Institute for Agricultural, Fisheries and Food (ILVO), Utrecht University [Utrecht], Natural Resources Institute Finland (LUKE), European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No 816172, Joint Online Conference OK-Net EcoFeed, PPILOW, Freebirds and POWER EU Projects, and European Project: 816172,H2020-EU.3.2.1.1. - Increasing production efficiency and coping with climate change, while ensuring sustainability and resilience ,PPILOW (2019)
- Subjects
[SDV.SA]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Agricultural sciences ,[SDV.GEN]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Genetics ,[SDV.BA]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Animal biology ,[SDV.BDLR]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Reproductive Biology ,[SDV.AEN]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Food and Nutrition ,[SDV.BDD]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Development Biology ,ComputingMilieux_MISCELLANEOUS - Abstract
International audience
- Published
- 2021
22. Morphofunctional features of rehabilitation after total laryngectomy and relationship with the olfactory function
- Author
-
Passerini, Michelle, DA RE, Martina, Antoni, Sonia, Tirelli, Giancarlo, Grill, Vittorio, SOCIETA' ITALIANA DI ANATOMIA E ISTOLOGIA, Passerini, Michelle, DA RE, Martina, Antoni, Sonia, Tirelli, Giancarlo, and Grill, Vittorio
- Subjects
Olfactory rehabilitation ,Total laryngectomy - Abstract
Total laryngectomy is a radical surgery that has to be performed for advanced laryngeal cancer. Although this surgical therapy is really life-saving, however it radically changes the anatomical features of the cervical tracts of both the respiratory and the digestive tracts with serious implications in the psychology of the patients, due to loss of normal speech, normal swallowing, as well as loss of breathing through the nasal cavities. Therefore, not only speech and swallowing rehabilitation is really necessary, but also that one of the olfactory functions. Speech rehabilitation consists in the development of either the pharyngeal voice or the oesophageal one. Particular relevance should involve also the recovery of the olfactory function that is compromised (hyposmia and anosmia), since air does not transit through the nasal cavities, but it reaches the lower respiratory tracts through the surgically built tracheostomy. It causes an atrophy of the neurons of the olfactory mucosa and sometimes also of the olfactory bulb in the anterior cranial fossa. Olfactory rehabilitation consists in logopedic exercises involving the lowering of the jaw, the oral floor, the root of the tongue and the soft palate. In the present investigation, laryngectomized patients underwent prior nasal endoscopy to verify the normal morphology of the nasal mucosa. Subsequently olfactometric tests were done in order to identify twenty-six different smells. After the rehabilitation phase, new olfactometric tests revealed that there was an improvement in smell identification by all the examined patients. Such results showed that the rehabilitation of the olfactory activity should be performed in addition of speech and swallowing recovery in laryngectomized patients in order to improve the quality of their life.
- Published
- 2019
23. Placental Pathology Findings and the Risk of Intraventricular and Cerebellar Hemorrhage in Preterm Neonates
- Author
-
Parodi, Alessandro, primary, De Angelis, Laura Costanza, additional, Re, Martina, additional, Raffa, Sarah, additional, Malova, Mariya, additional, Rossi, Andrea, additional, Severino, Mariasavina, additional, Tortora, Domenico, additional, Morana, Giovanni, additional, Calevo, Maria Grazia, additional, Brisigotti, Maria Pia, additional, Buffelli, Francesca, additional, Fulcheri, Ezio, additional, and Ramenghi, Luca Antonio, additional
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
24. PPILOW, a European project dedicated to welfare in Poultry and PIg Low-input outdoor and Organic production systems - Newsletter issue 1
- Author
-
Collin, Anne, Lagendijk, Emmanuelle, Re, Martina, Niemi, Jarkko, Kliphuis, Saskia, Baldinger, Lisa, Steenfeldt, Sanna, Reverchon, Maxime, Roinsard, Antoine, Bessa Ferreira, Vitor Hugo, Simoni, Arthur, Leruste, Hélène, Germain, Karine, Le Bihan-Duval, Elisabeth, Mignon-Grasteau, Sandrine, Guettier, Elodie, Calandreau, Ludovic, Guesdon, Vanessa, Bonnefous, Claire, Carelli, Riccardo, Sciarretta, Marlene, Collin, Anne, PPILOW - Poultry and PIg Low-input and Organic production systems' Welfare (#816172) - PPILOW - - H2020-EU.3.2.1.1. - Increasing production efficiency and coping with climate change, while ensuring sustainability and resilience 2019-09-01 - 2024-08-31 - 816172 - VALID, and EAAP
- Subjects
[SDV.AEN] Life Sciences [q-bio]/Food and Nutrition ,[SDV.SA] Life Sciences [q-bio]/Agricultural sciences ,[SDV.BA] Life Sciences [q-bio]/Animal biology ,[SDV.BDD] Life Sciences [q-bio]/Development Biology ,[SDV.GEN] Life Sciences [q-bio]/Genetics ,[SCCO] Cognitive science ,[SDV.BDLR] Life Sciences [q-bio]/Reproductive Biology - Published
- 2020
25. Smell Rehabilitation: Recovery of Olfactory Perception and Discrimination in Twelve Cases of Total Laryngectomy
- Author
-
Passerini, Michelle, primary, Da Re, Martina, additional, Antoni, Sonia, additional, Cellot, Giada, additional, Tirelli, Giancarlo, additional, and Grill, Vittorio, additional
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
26. Smell Rehabilitation: Recovery of Olfactory Perception and Discrimination in Twelve Cases of Total Laryngectomy
- Author
-
Giancarlo Tirelli, Martina Da Re, Vittorio Grill, Giada Cellot, Sonia Antoni, Michelle Passerini, Passerini, Michelle, DA RE, Martina, Antoni, Sonia, Cellot, Giada, Tirelli, Giancarlo, and Grill, Vittorio
- Subjects
Olfactory perception ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Rehabilitation ,smell rehabilitation ,business.industry ,medicine.medical_treatment ,total laryngectomy ,Audiology ,Laryngectomy ,olfactory discrimination ,medicine ,olfactory perception ,business - Abstract
Objective: Total laryngectomy (TL) is a surgical practice widely used in the therapy of advanced laryngeal cancer. Since TL provokes loss of both speech and smell functions, the aim of the present work was to evaluate the effect of a smell rehabilitation cycle in twelve total laryngectomized patients. Methods: Twelve laryngectomized patients were enrolled to undergo a smell rehabilitation cycle in addition to previously performed speech recovery. For this aim the Nasal Airflow-Inducing Maneuver (NAIM) was employed to allow air to reach the nasal cavities again. Both olfactory perception and olfactory discrimination of odorous substances were evaluated by numeric scores to assess the modifications induced by the smell rehabilitative intervention on the recovery of the olfactory functions. Results: Smell capability, as regards the olfactory perception, ameliorated in the group of patients already after the first week of the smell rehabilitation cycle. Subsequently also the olfactory discrimination was evaluated, both at the end of the rehabilitation cycle (day 28) and after a period of twelve months, and we observeda significant amelioration at the end of the rehabilitative intervention that was essentially maintained even after one year although without a constant assistance performed by speech therapists. Conclusions: Smell rehabilitation should be always considered after TL in addition to speech restoration. Recovered smell perception and discrimination could enhance the related taste sensitivity, therefore restored olfactory functions could also ameliorate significantly the quality of life in total laryngectomized patients.
- Published
- 2020
27. The Role of Speech Therapists in Olfactory Rehabilitation: a Short Report on Ten Cases of Total Laryngectomy
- Author
-
Giancarlo Tirelli, Cristina Pierluca, Michelle Passerini, Vittorio Grill, Sonia Antoni, Martina Da Re, Passerini, Michelle, DA RE, Martina, Antoni, Sonia, Pierluca, Cristina, Tirelli, Giancarlo, and Grill, Vittorio
- Subjects
Olfactory system ,Taste ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Rehabilitation ,Vocal rehabilitation ,business.industry ,Speech therapist ,medicine.medical_treatment ,Total laryngectomy ,General Medicine ,respiratory system ,Audiology ,Speech Therapist ,Laryngectomy ,Olfactory rehabilitation ,Recovery method ,otorhinolaryngologic diseases ,medicine ,business - Abstract
Introduction: Total Laryngectomy (TL) has to be performed in advanced hypopharyngeal or laryngeal cancer, with the consequence of both the loss of the vocal and the impairment or loss of smell and taste. Since less attention is turned towards the recovery of the olfactory function compared to the vocal rehabilitation, the Nasal Airfl ow-Induced Maneuver (NAIM) was proposed as a useful smell recovery method. In this short note, we report the results of the olfactory rehabilitation procedures by performing the NAIM technique in ten total laryngectomized patients with the evaluation of both the subjective olfactory detection and the olfactory discrimination, recognition and identifi cation of odorous substances and we would emphasize the role of speech therapists in this rehabilitative procedure. Materials and methods: Ten total laryngectomized patients were proposed to undergo an olfactory rehabilitation cycle performed by speech therapists by employing the NAIM technique. The subjective olfactory detection was evaluate at three different time intervals during the rehabilitation cycle. The olfactory discrimination, recognition and identifi cation capability was considered both during and 12 moths after the end of the rehabilitation treatment. Results: The NAIM performed together with the speech therapist ameliorated signifi cantly all olfactory functions.evidence and the functional recovery was confirmed 12 months after the end of the rehabilitation cycle, thus the role of speech therapists appears relevant in both the olfactory recovery and the maintenance of the regained olfactory capability. Conclusion: The role of speech therapists should be aimed not exclusively towards the recovery of the vocal functions, but also towards the recovery of the olfactory functions. Speech therapists are able to adjust the original NAIM method to the specifi c need of each patient. Therefore, the role of speech therapists should be considered highly relevant to regain the olfactory function to allow again a good quality of life even after TL surgery.
- Published
- 2020
Catalog
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.