Search

Background A subgroup of patients with HER2-positive metastatic gastric and gastroesophageal junction cancers shows long-term response under trastuzumab maintenance monotherapy. Obviously, HER2 status alone is not able to identify these patients. We performed this study to identify potential new prognostic biomarkers for this long-term responding patient group. Patients and methods Tumor samples of 19 patients with HER2-positive metastatic gastric and gastroesophageal junction cancer who underwent trastuzumab treatment were retrospectively collected from multiple centers. Patients were divided into long-term responding (n=7) or short-term responding group (n=12) according to progression-free survival (PFS≥12 months vs. PFS

Aim: Cancer remains a disease with a significant impact on morbidity and mortality but also on quality of life. This prospective randomized pilot study investigated the effects of a sound intervention on physical and emotional well-being in outpatients with cancer. Methods: Two self-applied sound interventions were used for this purpose, either active “music playing” with a body monochord or passive sound intervention with headphones to listen to a given music compilation. Interventions were carried out over a period of 4 weeks for at least 15 min in the evening before bedtime. The following self-assessment questionnaires were completed both at baseline and after 4 weeks to evaluate the response: the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ-C30), Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for pain and fatigue, and the Fear of Progression (FoP) questionnaire. Primary endpoint of this exploratory trial was to describe the rate of patients with improvement in at least one dimension without worsening of any other. Results: 73 patients (29 male, 44 female) were included in the study and randomized to either active (n = 34, 47%) or passive sound intervention (n = 39, 53%). Median age was 52.0 years (range 21–79). Fourteen patients (19%) stated that they were musically active. The sound intervention was carried out on a median of 26 days (range 5–28). A higher percentage of patients in the passive group reached the primary endpoint: n = 15 (39%) versus n = 9 (27%). Response differences in favour of the passive group were seen with the VAS fatigue and with QLQ-30 questionnaires. Overall, an improvement in QLQ-30 questionnaire was seen in 12 patients (31%) in the passive group versus 3 patients (9%). Moreover, sound intervention significantly improved social functioning and shortness of breath in the passive group according to QLQ-C30. Significant improvements were also noticed in the passive group in terms of affective reactions as a domain of the FoP questionnaire. No effects on pain or sleep quality could be observed. Conclusion: A 4-week self-administered sound intervention was feasible in outpatients suffering from cancer. Using a panel of 5 questionnaires, passive sound interventions appeared to be more likely to positively influence patient-reported outcomes. In particular, a positive impact was documented in social functioning and fatigue.

PURPOSE High pathologic complete response (pCR) rates and comparably good survival data were seen in a phase II trial combining perioperative fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin, and docetaxel (FLOT) chemotherapy with trastuzumab for resectable, esophagogastric adenocarcinoma (EGA). The current trial evaluates the addition of trastuzumab and pertuzumab to FLOT as perioperative treatment for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–positive resectable EGA. METHODS In this multicenter, randomized phase II/III trial, patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–positive, resectable EGA (≥ clinical tumor 2 or clinical nodal–positive) were assigned to four pre- and postoperative cycles of either FLOT alone (arm A) or combined with trastuzumab and pertuzumab, followed by nine cycles of trastuzumab/pertuzumab (arm B). The primary end point for the phase II part was the rate of pCR. RESULTS The trial was closed prematurely, without transition into phase III, after results of the JACOB trial were reported. Eighty-one patients were randomly assigned (A: 41/B: 40) during the phase II part. The pCR rate was significantly improved with the trastuzumab/pertuzumab treatment (A: 12%/B: 35%; P = .02). Similarly, the rate of pathologic lymph node negativity was higher with trastuzumab/pertuzumab (A: 39%/B: 68%), whereas the R0 resection rate (A: 90%/B: 93%) and surgical morbidity (A: 43%/B: 44%) were comparable. Moreover, the inhouse mortality was equal in both arms (overall 2.5%). The median disease-free survival was 26 months in arm A and not yet reached in arm B (hazard ratio, 0.58; P = .14). After a median follow-up of 22 months, the median overall survival was not yet reached (hazard ratio, 0.56; P = .24). Disease-free survival and overall survival rates at 24 months were 54% (95% CI, 38 to 71) and 77% (95% CI, 63 to 90) in arm A and 70% (95% CI, 55 to 85) and 84% (95% CI, 72 to 96) in arm B, respectively. More ≥ grade 3 adverse events were reported with trastuzumab/pertuzumab, especially diarrhea (A: 5%/B: 41%) and leukopenia (A: 13%/B: 23%). CONCLUSION The addition of trastuzumab/pertuzumab to perioperative FLOT significantly improved pCR and nodal negativity rates at the price of higher rates of diarrhea and leukopenia.

Cardiotoxicity due to antitumor therapy is a dreaded complication and could thus impact the prognosis of patients with breast cancer. This study sought to analyze the occurrence of adverse cardiovascular events and to identify potential risk factors.A total of 136 patients with breast cancer were divided into two groups based on the occurrence of treatment-related cardiovascular toxicity [event 47 (35%) vs. no event 89 (65%)]. Patients were followed over a median of 45 months (range=37-83 months).Most common events were thromboembolic complications (26%), followed by heart failure (15%) and acute toxic cardiomyopathy (5%), with a reduced left ventricular ejection fraction [LVEF (%), no event 59±5.0 vs. event 55±11, p=0.01 ]. Patients with leftsided breast cancer and an advanced stage disease had a higher risk of developing adverse cardiovascular events. The highest risk was found for patients with a high number of cardiovascular risk factors. In addition to LVEF, mitral annular plane systolic excursion was also significantly reduced in the event group, while there was a trend for higher global longitudinal strain. During follow-up, 26 patients (19.1%) deceased, whereof 12 had a treatment-related cardiovascular event, but without statistical difference.Treatment-related cardiovascular events are relatively common in about one third of patients with breast cancer. Women with a cardiovascular risk profile or an advanced stage disease had a higher risk for adverse events. Despite the treatment-related cardiac deterioration, no difference in mortality was observed during follow up.

To evaluate the usage of RT in trial protocols for anti-cancer drugs approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA).Drugs which had been granted an FDA approval between 2010 and 2017 for the treatment of solid tumors in adults were identified. Use of RT in relation to each drug's approval date was reviewed on ClinicalTrials.gov.Out of 42 drugs, none was initially approved for an indication which mandates RT. One drug (2.4%) has a post-approval label extension for sequential usage after RT. 5846 records were screened, exclusion of non-cancer trials and duplicates resulted in 4254 protocols out of which 2919 were industry-sponsored (68.6%). RT was tested in 350 (8.2%) studies. Out of 75 drug/RT trials which were initiated prior to approval, fourteen had not yet started recruitment, 45 were recruiting, one was completed, one prematurely terminated and fourteen fully-recruited but ongoing at approval time. Out of the fully-recruited or completed studies, results from four studies on three drugs were already published. In 52.4% of drugs, no patient had been treated with a drug/RT combination at the approval date. Drug/RT studies were less likely industry-sponsored (p 0.001) and more likely initiated post-approval (p 0.001) compared to drug-only trials. Despite this imbalance, pre-approval drug/RT trials were still mostly industry-sponsored (65.3%).No drug/RT data were publicly available in over 90% of newly approved anti-cancer drugs. These results indicate that clinicians must rely on postmarketing surveillance to identify drug/RT interactions as data from trials are unavailable at approval.

Aim: The present exploratory study investigated the diagnostic value of inflammatory markers in patients with breast cancer to predict anti-tumour treatment-related cardiac events. Methods: Twenty-one patients with breast cancer were enrolled in this prospective observational study and followed over 6 months. Transthoracic echocardiography and measurement of cardiac (N-terminal prohormone of brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), troponin I (TnI)) and inflammatory biomarkers (vascular adhesion molecule 1 (VCAM-1), soluble suppression of tumorigenesis-2 (sST2), adiponectin) was performed at 3-month intervals (baseline, follow-up, final visit). Cardiac events were defined as decrease in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF, decrease by 10% or −16%), as a more sensitive marker of LV function. Results: Cardiac deterioration was observed in 9 out of 21 patients (event group). While LVEF did not differ significantly between the two groups (event vs. no event) at any visit, GLS was significantly higher during follow-up (follow-up: event −16 ± 3.3% vs. no event −18 ± 1.6%, p = 0.04; final visit: event −16 ± 2.1% vs. no event −19 ± 1.9%, p = 0.003). NT-proBNP was numerically higher in patients with a cardiac event during all visits, with NT-proBNP negatively correlated with LVEF and MAPSE (both r = −0.33, p = 0.02), whereas GLS (r = 0.40, p = 0.006), TnI (r = 0.44, p = 0.001), and VCAM-1 (r = 0.48, p = 0.003) showed a positive association with NT-proBNP. In comparison, higher VCAM-1 and sST2 concentrations were detected in the event group at both baseline and the final visit, with a significant difference for baseline (VCAM-1: p = 0.02; sST2: p = 0.03). Adiponectin was also lower in patients with a treatment-related event. Thresholds for VCAM-1 >762 ng/mL and sST2 >18.7 ng/mL, as detected by ROC analysis, correlated best with the primary endpoint. Conclusion: Cardiac events during anti-tumour treatment in patients with breast cancer are relatively common. Inflammatory markers such as VCAM-1 or sST2 were associated with an increased likelihood for occurrence of a treatment-related event, which may therefore hold the promise to better identify patients at high risk.

usually not provided for an editorial

This multicenter, randomized phase II/III study evaluated the addition of the vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2 inhibitor ramucirumab to FLOT as perioperative treatment for resectable esophagogastric adenocarcinoma. Patients received either FLOT alone (Arm A) or combined with ramucirumab followed by ramucirumab monotherapy (Arm B). The primary endpoint for the phase II portion was the pathological complete or subtotal response (pCR/pSR) rate. Baseline characteristics were comparable between both arms with a high rate of tumors signet-ring cell component (A:47% B:43%). No between-arm difference in pCR/pSR rate was seen (A:29% B:26%), therefore the transition to phase III was not pursued. Nevertheless, the combination was associated with a significantly increased R0-resection rate compared to FLOT alone (A:82% B:96%; p=0.009). In addition, the median disease-free survival was numerically improved in Arm B (A:21 months B:32 months, HR 0.75, p=0.218), while the median overall survival was similar in both treatment arms (A:45 months B:46 months, HR 0.94, p=0.803). Patients with Siewert type I tumors receiving transthoracic esophagectomy with intrathoracic anastomosis showed an increased risk of serious postoperative complications after ramucirumab treatment, therefore recruitment of those patients was stopped after the first-third of the study. Overall, surgical morbidity and mortality was comparable, whereas more non-surgical grade≥3 adverse events were observed with the combination, especially anorexia (A:1% B:11%), hypertension (A:4% B:13%) and infections (A:19% B:33%). The combination of ramucirumab and FLOT as perioperative treatment shows efficacy signals, particularly in terms of R0 resection rates, for a study population with a high proportion of prognostically poor histological subtypes, and further evaluation in this subgroup seems warranted. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

The analysis of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is at the threshold of implementation into standard care for colorectal cancer (CRC) patients. However, data about the clinical utility of liquid profiling (LP), its acceptance by clinicians, and its integration into clinical workflows in real-world settings remain limited. Here, LP tests requested as part of routine care since 2016 were retrospectively evaluated. Results show restrained request behavior that improved moderately over time, as well as reliable diagnostic performance comparable to translational studies, with an overall agreement of 91.7%. Extremely low ctDNA levels at 0.1% in over 20% of cases, a high frequency of concomitant driver mutations (in up to 14% of cases), and ctDNA levels reflecting the clinical course of disease were revealed. However, certain limitations hampering successful translation of ctDNA into clinical practice were uncovered, including the lack of clinically relevant ctDNA thresholds, appropriate time points of LP requests, and integrative evaluation of ctDNA, imaging, and clinical findings. In conclusion, these results highlight the potential clinical value of LP for CRC patient management and demonstrate issues that need to be addressed for successful long-term implementation in clinical workflows.

Epidemiological data indicate that more than 50 % of patients with newly-diagnosed rectal cancer are older than 70 years, with rising numbers expected over the next decades. Treatment decision-making is challenging in elderly and frail patients with rectal cancer, whereas standardized treatment guidelines for this patient cohort are lacking. Elderly and frail rectal cancer patients are often considered by surgeons as unfit to undergo radical surgery as the risk of surgical complications and postoperative mortality rises with increasing age and comorbidity. Furthermore, these patients often receive no treatment at all, resulting in local and/or systemic disease progression with associated symptoms and impaired quality of life (QoL). Recent data from randomized trials in young fit patients with early stage rectal cancer indicate that RT dose escalation can be safely delivered using external beam (chemo)radiotherapy (EBRT) followed by endoluminal radiotherapeutic modalities, such as contact X-ray brachytherapy (CXB) or high-dose rate endorectal brachytherapy (HDR-BT). However, prospective studies testing this therapeutic concept in elderly and frail patients remain limited. Here, we review the current evidence in the epidemiology and the management of elderly and frail patients with rectal cancer. We summarize the potential of RT dose escalation to achieve long-term local control of the primary tumour, prevent disease-related morbidity, improve QoL and even organ preservation. Future perspectives and open questions will be discussed as well.

Background: There is a lack of predictive models to identify patients at risk of high neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT)-related acute toxicity in rectal cancer. Patient and Methods: The CAO/ARO/AIO-04 trial was divided into a development (n = 831) and a validation (n = 405) cohort. Using a best subset selection approach, predictive models for grade 3–4 acute toxicity were calculated including clinicopathologic characteristics, pretreatment blood parameters, and baseline results of quality-of-life questionnaires and evaluated using the area under the ROC curve. The final model was internally and externally validated. Results: In the development cohort, 155 patients developed grade 3–4 toxicities due to CRT. In the final evaluation, 15 parameters were included in the logistic regression models using best-subset selection. BMI, gender, and emotional functioning remained significant for predicting toxicity, with a discrimination ability adjusted for overfitting of AUC 0.687. The odds of experiencing high-grade toxicity were 3.8 times higher in the intermediate and 6.4 times higher in the high-risk group (p < 0.001). Rates of toxicity (p = 0.001) and low treatment adherence (p = 0.007) remained significantly different in the validation cohort, whereas discrimination ability was not significantly worse (DeLong test 0.09). Conclusion: We developed and validated a predictive model for toxicity using gender, BMI, and emotional functioning. Such a model could help identify patients at risk for treatment-related high-grade toxicity to assist in treatment guidance and patient participation in shared decision making.

Ralf-Dieter Hofheinz,1 Jordi Bruix,2 George D Demetri,3 Axel Grothey,4 Marisca Marian,5 Jennifer Bartsch,6 Dawn Odom6 1Interdisciplinary Tumor Center, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany; 2Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) Group, Hospital Clinic. IDIBAPS, University of Barcelona, CIBERehd, Barcelona, Spain; 3Ludwig Center, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; 4Gastrointestinal Cancer Research, West Cancer Center, OneOncology, Germantown, TN, USA; 5Oncology, Pharmaceuticals Division of Bayer AG, Basel, Switzerland; 6Department of Biostatistics, RTI Health Solutions, Research Triangle Park, NC, USACorrespondence: Ralf-Dieter HofheinzInterdisciplinary Tumor Center, University of Heidelberg, Theodor-Kutzer Ufer 1-3, Mannheim, 68167, GermanyTel +49 621 383 2855Fax +49 621 383 2488Email ralf.hofheinz@umm.dePurpose: The efficacy and safety of regorafenib have been demonstrated in phase 3 trials for multiple tumor types, including metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) (CORRECT [NCT01103323]; CONCUR [NCT01584830]), advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) (GRID [NCT01271712]), and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) (RESORCE [NCT01774344]). The objective of this post hoc exploratory analysis was to explore the impact of regorafenib on delaying health-related quality of life (HRQOL) deterioration across these tumor types.Patients and Methods: HRQOL data (assessed with EORTC QLQ-C30 and EQ-5D questionnaires) were pooled for all trials to determine time until definitive deterioration (TUDD), defined as the patient’s first minimal clinically important deterioration in HRQOL score from baseline that does not resolve, using stratified Kaplan–Meier estimators and Cox proportional hazards models adjusted for relevant trial, cancer type, and baseline covariates. Additional analyses based on cancer type were conducted by pooling mCRC trials (CORRECT and CONCUR) and pooling the two mCRC trials with the HCC trial (RESORCE).Results: A total of 1699 patients with HRQOL data were pooled across the four trials. The results showed that regorafenib significantly delayed TUDD compared with placebo across all three tumor types. Median time to deterioration across the five scales ranged from 16.3 to 24.1 weeks for regorafenib and 8.6 to 12.1 weeks for placebo. The results from the individual studies, the pooled mCRC trials, and the pooled mCRC and HCC trials were similar to the overall pooled results.Conclusion: A pooled analysis of four phase 3 trials demonstrated that regorafenib delayed a clinically relevant exploratory endpoint, defined as TUDD, compared with placebo across three different tumor types (mCRC, GIST, and HCC), which supports a novel benefit of the impact of regorafenib with respect to patients with these three types of cancers by allowing initial declines in HRQOL to resolve and patients the opportunity to continue treatment.Keywords: gastrointestinal cancer, metastatic colorectal cancer, hepatocellular cancer, quality of life, regorafenib

There is a lack of predictive models to identify patients at risk of high neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT)-related acute toxicity in rectal cancer.The CAO/ARO/AIO-04 trial was divided into a development (n = 831) and a validation (n = 405) cohort. Using a best subset selection approach, predictive models for grade 3-4 acute toxicity were calculated including clinicopathologic characteristics, pretreatment blood parameters, and baseline results of quality-of-life questionnaires and evaluated using the area under the ROC curve. The final model was internally and externally validated.In the development cohort, 155 patients developed grade 3-4 toxicities due to CRT. In the final evaluation, 15 parameters were included in the logistic regression models using best-subset selection. BMI, gender, and emotional functioning remained significant for predicting toxicity, with a discrimination ability adjusted for overfitting of AUC 0.687. The odds of experiencing high-grade toxicity were 3.8 times higher in the intermediate and 6.4 times higher in the high-risk group (We developed and validated a predictive model for toxicity using gender, BMI, and emotional functioning. Such a model could help identify patients at risk for treatment-related high-grade toxicity to assist in treatment guidance and patient participation in shared decision making.

Background: Early efficacy outcome measures in rectal cancer after total neoadjuvant treatment are increasingly investigated. We examined the prognostic role of pathological complete response (pCR), tumor regression grading (TRG) and neoadjuvant rectal (NAR) score for disease-free survival (DFS) in patients with rectal carcinoma treated within the CAO/ARO/AIO-12 randomized phase 2 trial. Methods: Distribution of pCR, TRG and NAR score was analyzed using the Pearson’s chi-squared test. Univariable analyses were performed using the log-rank test, stratified by treatment arm. Discrimination ability of non-pCR for DFS was assessed by analyzing the ROC curve as a function of time. Results: Of the 311 patients enrolled, 306 patients were evaluable (Arm A:156, Arm B:150). After a median follow-up of 43 months, the 3-year DFS was 73% in both groups (HR, 0.95, 95% CI, 0.63–1.45, p = 0.82). pCR tended to be higher in Arm B (17% vs. 25%, p = 0.086). In both treatment arms, pCR, TRG and NAR were significant prognostic factors for DFS, whereas survival in subgroups defined by pCR, TRG or NAR did not significantly differ between the treatment arms. The discrimination ability of non-pCR for DFS remained constant over time (C-Index 0.58) but was slightly better in Arm B (0.61 vs. 0.56). Conclusion: Although pCR, TRG and NAR were strong prognostic factors for DFS in the CAO/ARO/AIO-12 trial, their value in selecting one TNT approach over another could not be confirmed. Hence, the conclusion of a long-term survival benefit of one treatment arm based on early surrogate endpoints should be stated with caution.

Aflibercept plus FOLFIRI prolongs overall survival (OS) in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer after the failure of oxaliplatin-containing therapy. QoLiTrap prospectively evaluated the quality of life (QoL) and effectiveness of this regimen in daily clinical practice, according to RAS status, sex, and prior targeted therapy, especially epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors (EGFR-I). The primary endpoint was the percentage of patients whose EORTC QLQ-C30 global health status (GHS) improved or reduced by

Early efficacy outcome measures in rectal cancer after total neoadjuvant treatment are increasingly investigated. We examined the prognostic role of pathological complete response (pCR), tumor regression grading (TRG) and neoadjuvant rectal (NAR) score for disease-free survival (DFS) in patients with rectal carcinoma treated within the CAO/ARO/AIO-12 randomized phase 2 trial.Distribution of pCR, TRG and NAR score was analyzed using the Pearson's chi-squared test. Univariable analyses were performed using the log-rank test, stratified by treatment arm. Discrimination ability of non-pCR for DFS was assessed by analyzing the ROC curve as a function of time.Of the 311 patients enrolled, 306 patients were evaluable (Arm A:156, Arm B:150). After a median follow-up of 43 months, the 3-year DFS was 73% in both groups (HR, 0.95, 95% CI, 0.63-1.45,Although pCR, TRG and NAR were strong prognostic factors for DFS in the CAO/ARO/AIO-12 trial, their value in selecting one TNT approach over another could not be confirmed. Hence, the conclusion of a long-term survival benefit of one treatment arm based on early surrogate endpoints should be stated with caution.

Nach neoadjuvanter Radiochemotherapie (RCT) wird bei 10–20 % der Patienten mit lokal fortgeschrittenem Rektumkarzinom eine pathologische Komplettremission nachgewiesen. Kann bei selektionierten Patienten mit klinisch exzellentem Tumoransprechen nach RCT auf eine radikale Operation im Sinne einer Watch-and-wait(W&W)-Strategie verzichtet werden? Die vorliegende Studie beinhaltet die Auswertung populationsbezogener Datensammlungen sowie prospektiver klinischer Studien zum Organerhalt nach RCT. Bei Standard-RCT und Restaging nach ca. 6 bis 8 Wochen mittels Rektoskopie und MRT zeigen sich klinische Komplettremissionen in einer Grosenordnung von 10–20 %. Bei Verzicht auf eine radikale Operation fur diese selektionierte Subgruppe mit biologisch hochresponsiven Tumoren ist bei engmaschiger Nachsorge ein lokales Tumorwiederwachstum innerhalb der ersten beiden Jahre in 20–30 % zu erwarten. Dieses Wiederwachstum ist in >90 % der Falle luminal detektierbar, auf die Darmwand begrenzt und einer kurativen Salvage-Operation zuganglich. Derzeit werden intensivierte RCT-Regime getestet. Studien zur totalen neoadjuvanten Therapie (TNT) zeigen signifikant erhohte Komplettremissionsraten, ein verbessertes krankheitsfreies Uberleben, und mogen richtungsweisend fur das Konzept des selektiven Organerhalts sein. Es bedarf weiterer prospektiver Studien mit ausreichenden Patientenzahlen und Nachbeobachtungszeiten, um die onkologische Sicherheit sowie das Risiko-Nutzen-Verhaltnis fur Patienten, die sich fur eine W&W-Option entscheiden, einzuordnen.

Few data exist on health-related quality of life (QoL) in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer (mPC) receiving first-line chemotherapy (Awad L ZE, Mesbah M Boston, MA. Applying survival data methodology to analyze quality of life data, in Mesbah M, Cole BF, Ting Lee M-L (eds): Statistical Methods for Quality of Life Studies: Design, Measurements and Analysis. Kluwer Academic Publishers 2002). The QOLIXANE study is a prospective, noninterventional, multicenter substudy of the Platform for Outcome, Quality of Life and Translational Research on Pancreatic Cancer (PARAGON) registry, which evaluated QoL in patients with mPC receiving first-line gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel chemotherapy in real-life setting. QoL was prospectively measured via EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaires at baseline and every month thereafter. Therapy and efficacy parameters were prospectively collected. Main objectives were the rate of patients without deterioration of Global Health Status/QoL (GHS/QoL) at 3 and 6 months. Six hundred patients were enrolled in 95 German study sites. Median progression-free survival was 5.9 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 5.2-6.3). Median overall survival (OS) was 8.9 months (95% CI, 7.9-10.2), while median time to deterioration of GHS/QoL was 4.7 months (95% CI, 4.0-5.6). With a baseline GHS/QoL score of 46 (SD, 22.8), baseline QoL of the patients was severely impaired, in most cases due to loss in role functioning and fatigue. In the Kaplan-Meier analysis, 61% and 41% of patients had maintained GHS/QoL after 3 and 6 months, respectively. However, in the QoL response analysis, 35% and 19% of patients had maintained (improved or stable) GHS/QoL after 3 and 6 months, respectively, while 14% and 9% had deteriorated GHS/QoL with the remaining patients being nonevaluable. In the Cox regression analysis, GHS/QoL scores strongly predicted survival with a hazard ratio of 0.86 (P < .0001). Patients with mPC have poor QoL at baseline that deteriorates within a median of 4.7 months. Treatment with gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel is associated with maintained QoL in relevant proportions of patients. However, overall, results remain poor, reflecting the aggressive nature of the disease.

Die Behandlungsstrategien beim lokal fortgeschrittenen Rektumkarzinom verandern sich derzeit deutlich. Die in den Leitlinien fur lokal fortgeschrittene Tumoren empfohlene Therapie einer neoadjuvanten Radio(chemo)therapie mit anschliesender Chirurgie und ggf. adjuvanter Therapie wird zunehmend zugunsten folgender Konzepte verlassen: prolongierte neoadjuvante (Chemo‑)Therapie (oft als „totale neoadjuvante Therapie“, TNT, bezeichnet); Verzicht auf Strahlentherapie bei Patienten mit einem niedrigen Lokalrezidivrisiko; „Watch-and-wait-Konzept“ bzw. Organerhalt bei Patienten mit einem kompletten klinischen Ansprechen nach einer neoadjuvanten Radiochemotherapie. Im vorliegenden Beitrag werden – ausgehend vom gegenwartigen Status quo auf dem Boden aktueller Publikationen – insbesondere die TNT und der Verzicht auf die Strahlentherapie diskutiert. Leitlinienkonform kann bei einem Rektumkarzinom, welches in einer qualitatsgesicherten Magnetresonanztomographie (MRT) Kriterien einer Niedrigrisikosituation fur ein Lokalrezidiv aufweist, auf eine neoadjuvante Radio(chemo)therapie verzichtet werden und eine sofortige totale mesorektale Exzision indiziert werden.

Nintedanib is a triple angiokinase inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 1-3, fibroblast growth factor receptor 1-3 and platelet-derived growth factor receptor-a/-b. Thereby, it targets angiogenic escape mechanisms. The trial TyRosine kinase Inhibitor for the treatment of Chemorefractory Colorectal Cancer (TRICC-C) trial evaluates the addition of nintedanib to mFOLFOX6 (fluorouracil, folinic acid and oxaliplatin) in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). TRICC-C is a randomised controlled, double-blinded, phase II trial in mCRC patients that received a first-line non-oxaliplatin containing chemotherapy. Patients received mFOLFOX6 + nintedanib (F + N) (2 × 200 mg p.o./d, d1-d14) or mFOLFOX6 + placebo (F + P), in a 1:1 ratio. Primary endpoint was median progression free survival (mPFS) and secondary overall response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS) and safety. Fifty-three patients (27 F + N; 26 F + P) were randomised between 12/2012 and 5/2016 (scheduled n = 180). The trial was terminated prematurely due to slow accrual. The trial did not reach its primary endpoint but mPFS, median overall survival (mOS) and disease control rate (DCR) were numerically higher in the F + N arm compared to the F + P arm; however, the difference was not significant (mPFS: F + P: 4.6 months vs F + N: 8.1 months; HR 0.65; 95% CI 0.32-1.30; P = .2156; mOS: F + P: 9.9 months vs F + N: 17.1 months; HR 1.03, 95% CI 0.48-2.23; P = .9387; DCR: F + P: 50% vs F + N: 66,7%; P = .2709). Toxicity was moderate and only different for neutropenia (F + P: 11.5%, F + N: 19.2%) and gastrointestinal disorders (F + P: 65.4%, F + N: 84.6%). Final results show safety and a nonsignificant trend towards improved PFS and DCR for the combination of mFOLFOX6 + nintedanib in the second-line therapy of mCRC.

Purpose Immune checkpoint inhibitors have shown efficacy in patients with microsatellite instability-high/mismatch repair-deficient (MSI-H/dMMR) gastrointestinal (GI) cancers. However, depth and duration of clinical response is not uniform. We assessed tumor mutation burden (TMB) as a response marker in patients with GI cancers treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors. Methods Detailed clinical and response data were collected from six patients with metastatic MSI-H/dMMR GI cancers treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors. Efficacy was assessed by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1. Tumors and matched normal tissue were profiled by targeted next generation sequencing (127 gene panel, size 0.8 Mb). Impact of included mutation types, germline filtering methodology and different variant allele frequency thresholds on TMB estimation was assessed. Results Objective radiographic responses were observed in all six patients, and complete response was achieved in two of the six patients. Responses were durable (minimum 25 months). TMB estimates were clearly above the two recently reported cut-offs for metastatic colorectal cancer of 12 or 37 mutations per megabase for five of six patients, respectively, while one patient had borderline TMB elevation. TMB did not show an association with extent and duration of response but was influenced by included mutation types, germline filtering method and variant allele frequency threshold. Conclusion Our case series confirms the clinical benefit of immune checkpoint blockade in patients with metastatic MSI-H/dMMR GI cancers and illustrates the vulnerability of TMB as predictive marker in a subset of patients.

ZusammenfassungZur Indikationsstellung und Stratifizierung der perioperativen Therapie des lokal fortgeschrittenen Rektumkarzinoms ist die Magnetresonanztomografie unverzichtbar. Im vorliegenden Beitrag werden der Stellenwert der MRT-Diagnostik und die qualitativen Voraussetzungen dargestellt.

Background: Effective treatments are needed to improve outcomes for high-grade glioma and low-grade glioma. The activity and safety of dabrafenib plus trametinib were evaluated in adult patients with recurrent or progressive BRAFV600E mutation-positive high-grade glioma and low-grade glioma. Methods: This study is part of an ongoing open-label, single-arm, phase 2 Rare Oncology Agnostic Research (ROAR) basket trial at 27 community and academic cancer centres in 13 countries (Austria, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, the Netherlands, Norway, South Korea, Spain, Sweden, and the USA). The study enrolled patients aged 18 years or older with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0, 1, or 2. Patients with BRAFV600E mutation-positive high-grade glioma and low-grade glioma received dabrafenib 150 mg twice daily plus trametinib 2 mg once daily orally until unacceptable toxicity, disease progression, or death. In the high-grade glioma cohort, patients were required to have measurable disease at baseline using the Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology high-grade glioma response criteria and have been treated previously with radiotherapy and first-line chemotherapy or concurrent chemoradiotherapy. Patients with low-grade glioma were required to have measurable non-enhancing disease (except pilocytic astrocytoma) at baseline using the Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology low-grade glioma criteria. The primary endpoint, in the evaluable intention-to-treat population, was investigator-assessed objective response rate (complete response plus partial response for high-grade glioma and complete response plus partial response plus minor response for low-grade glioma). This trial is ongoing, but is closed for enrolment, NCT02034110. Findings: Between April 17, 2014, and July 25, 2018, 45 patients (31 with glioblastoma) were enrolled into the high-grade glioma cohort and 13 patients were enrolled into the low-grade glioma cohort. The results presented here are based on interim analysis 16 (data cutoff Sept 14, 2020). In the high-grade glioma cohort, median follow-up was 12·7 months (IQR 5·4–32·3) and 15 (33%; 95% CI 20–49) of 45 patients had an objective response by investigator assessment, including three complete responses and 12 partial responses. In the low-grade glioma cohort, median follow-up was 32·2 months (IQR 25·1–47·8). Nine (69%; 95% CI 39–91) of 13 patients had an objective response by investigator assessment, including one complete response, six partial responses, and two minor responses. Grade 3 or worse adverse events were reported in 31 (53%) patients, the most common being fatigue (five [9%]), decreased neutrophil count (five [9%]), headache (three [5%]), and neutropenia (three [5%]). Interpretation: Dabrafenib plus trametinib showed clinically meaningful activity in patients with BRAFV600E mutation-positive recurrent or refractory high-grade glioma and low-grade glioma, with a safety profile consistent with that in other indications. BRAFV600E testing could potentially be adopted in clinical practice for patients with glioma. Funding: Novartis.

Total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) can enhance local tumor regression, but its survival benefits compared to intensified chemoradiotherapy (CRT) followed by adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) remain unclear.This is a secondary comparison between 607 patients treated with intensified 5-FU/Oxaliplatin neoadjuvant CRT and adjuvant CT within the experimental arm of the CAO/ARO/AIO-04 phase III trial, and 306 patients treated with TNT within the CAO/ARO/AIO-12 phase II trial. Comparison between clinical-pathological characteristics, surgical quality, and post-surgical complications were analyzed using the Pearson's Chi-squared or Mann-Whitney U test. Oncological outcome was examined with log-rank, Gray's test, and multivariate cox regression. In addition, further subgroup analyses and propensity score matching were performed to optimize the balance of baseline covariates.Patients treated with CRT followed by consolidation CT had a significantly higher rate of pathological complete remission (pCR) compared to patients treated within the experimental arm of the CAO/ARO/AIO-04 trial (25.3 % vs 17.3 %, P = 0.04). Post-surgical complications were less common in the CAO/ARO/AIO-12 trial. After a median follow-up of 46 months, clinical outcome did not differ significantly in the overall cohort, in any subgroup or after propensity score matching. In multivariate analysis, disease-free survival (DFS) was similar between the experimental arm of the CAO/ARO/AIO-04 trial and treatments arms of the CAO/ARO/AIO-12 trial (vs arm A: HR 0.92 [95 % CI 0.62-1.37], P = 0.69; vs arm B: HR 1.06 [95 % CI 0.72-1.58], P = 0.76).Notwithstanding the limitations of intertrial comparison, TNT did not improve long term oncological outcome in our study compared to the intensified neoadjuvant CRT and adjuvant CT treatment in the CAO/ARO/AIO-04 trial. Improved response rates after TNT offers an attractive option to explore organ preservation in selective patients with locally advanced rectal cancer.

115 Background: BI 905711 is a tetravalent bispecific antibody that cross-links TRAILR2 with CDH17. This cross-linking drives CDH17-dependent TRAILR2 oligomerization, leading to caspase activation and eventual apoptosis, inhibiting tumor growth in preclinical models of GI cancer. Methods: This Phase Ia/b study of BI 905711 in patients (pts) with advanced GI cancers (NCT04137289) aimed to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) based on the proportion of pts with dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) and explore preliminary antitumor activity. In Phase Ia, pts received BI 905711 every 14 days. One pt with colorectal cancer (CRC) was enrolled at each of the 2 lowest dose levels (0.02/0.06 mg/kg) and 4 pts with CRC were enrolled at each subsequent level (0.2/0.6/1.2/2.4/3.6/4.8 mg/kg). Up to 4 pts with non-CRC GI cancers were included at the dose level below the CRC cohort. Dose escalation was guided by a Bayesian logistic regression model. Results: As of 01 August 2022, 48 pts (CRC: n = 26; non-CRC: n = 22, including 13 with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma [PDAC]) had received BI 905711 (dose range 0.02–4.8 mg/kg); pts had a median age of 61 years (range 27–78) and had received a median of 3 (range 1–11) prior lines of treatment. No DLTs were observed and the MTD was not reached. 41 pts had AEs (grade [G] 3–5: 14 pts; serious: 13 pts). 17 pts had treatment-related AEs (TRAEs); 4 TRAEs were G3: AST increased (2 pts), fatigue and ALT increased (1 pt each). 1 pt had serious TRAEs: G2 decreased appetite and G3 fatigue. 2 pts had G1/2 infusion-related reactions that resolved and did not prevent resumption of treatment. PD biomarker modulation on the level of plasma caspase-3/7 activity was most common at 0.6 mg/kg (4/7 pts) or 1.2 mg/kg (2/6 pts). 13 pts achieved stable disease (SD) and 8 pts were progression-free for ≥4 months (PFS4). In pts with CRC, 6 pts achieved SD and 3 had PFS4. Among non-CRC pts, 7 pts achieved SD (PDAC: n = 6) and 5 had PFS4 (PDAC: n = 4). Median duration of treatment was 30.5 days (range 15–246) overall and 71 days (range 15–211) in the 0.6 mg/kg group (n = 8, predicted therapeutic dose; of whom 3 pts had PFS4: CRC: n = 1/4 [all CDH17+]; non-CRC: n = 2/4). Conclusions: In heavily pretreated pts, BI 905711 was associated with a tolerable safety profile and early signs of disease control. BI 905711 will be further assessed in Phase Ib in 4 dose groups: 0.6/1.2/2.4 mg/kg every 14 days, and 0.6 mg/kg weekly. Clinical trial information: NCT04137289 .

100 Background: FIRE-4 (AIO KRK-0114) is performed in RAS wild-type (wt) mCRC patients. This randomized study tests the efficacy of early switch maintenance during 1st-line therapy (part 1) and re-challenge with cetuximab (part 2) in later-line treatment. In part 1, all patients received first-line induction treatment with FOLFIRI plus cetuximab (FOLFIRI/Cet). In arm A, patients were randomized to continue FOLFIRI/Cet until progression or intolerable toxicity. In arm B, patients received FOLFIRI/Cet for 8-12 cycles, after which maintenance therapy with 5-FU/FA plus bevacizumab (5-FU/Bev) was applied. The first randomization evaluates the question if an early switch from cetuximab to bevacizumab during maintenance therapy may prolong PFS. The study protocol explicitly allowed a first cycle of chemotherapy to be applied before randomization. Methods: Within this randomized, controlled, open-label phase-III study, patients received FOLFIRI (irinotecan plus 5-FU/FA) plus cetuximab every two weeks at the standard dosing schedule. In arm A, FOLFIRI plus cetuximab was continued until progression or intolerable toxicity. De- and re-escalation was allowed according to the local standard of care. In arm B, patients received 8 cycles of FOLFIRI plus cetuximab (in case of tumor response) or 12 cycles (in case of stable disease) followed by maintenance with 5-FU/FA plus bevacizumab (5mg/kg) until disease progression or intolerable toxicity. Overall survival after second randomization (part 2) is evaluated as a primary endpoint. Here, we report PFS in first-line (part 1) as a secondary study endpoint of the study. Other secondary endpoints included ORR, OS, safety, and tolerability. Results: From August 2015 to January 2021, 672 patients were randomized, and 656 patients were assigned to treatment in 120 German and 10 Austrian centers (327 arm A and 329 in arm B). Of those, 205 patients received one cycle of FOLFIRI alone before randomization. In both arms, ORR was comparable for patients receiving cetuximab from the first cycle when compared to those receiving one cycle of chemotherapy only (arm A: 58.7% vs 62.9% (p = 0.54), arm B 60.2% vs 55.6% (p = 0.48). PFS was also not influenced in both arms (arm A: 10.8mo vs. 10.6mo (p = 0.91); arm B 11.2mo vs. 11.4mo (p = 0.62)). Preliminary results suggest that also OS (event rate 38.3%) was not influenced by one cycle applied without cetuximab (arm A: 33.7 mo vs. 29.1 mo (p = 0.20); arm B: 35.6 mo vs. 28.9 mo (p = 0.13)). Conclusions: Application of one initial cycle with chemotherapy alone did not influence the efficacy of a first-line strategy of FOLFIRI plus cetuximab. If RAS mutational analysis is not timely available, a start with FOLFIRI alone adding cetuximab in cycle 2 seems to be safe with respect of overall efficacy. Clinical trial information: NCT02934529 .

PURPOSE Total neoadjuvant therapy is a new paradigm for rectal cancer treatment. Optimal scheduling of preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) and chemotherapy remains to be established. PATIENTS AND METHODS We conducted a multicenter, randomized, phase II trial using a pick-the-winner design on the basis of the hypothesis of an increased pathologic complete response (pCR) of 25% after total neoadjuvant therapy compared with standard 15% after preoperative CRT. Patients with stage II or III rectal cancer were assigned to group A for induction chemotherapy using three cycles of fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin before fluorouracil/oxaliplatin CRT (50.4 Gy) or to group B for consolidation chemotherapy after CRT. Secondary end points included toxicity, compliance, and surgical morbidity. RESULTS Of the 311 patients enrolled, 306 patients were evaluable (156 in group A and 150 in group B). CRT-related grade 3 or 4 toxicity was lower (37% v 27%) and compliance with CRT higher in group B (91%, 78%, and 76% v 97%, 87%, and 93% received full-dose radiotherapy, concomitant fluorouracil, and concomitant oxaliplatin in groups A and B, respectively); 92% versus 85% completed all induction/consolidation chemotherapy cycles, respectively. The longer interval between completion of CRT and surgery in group B (median 90 v 45 days in group A) did not increase surgical morbidity. A pCR in the intention-to-treat population was achieved in 17% in group A and in 25% in group B. Thus, only group B ( P < .001), but not group A ( P = .210), fulfilled the predefined statistical hypothesis. CONCLUSION Up-front CRT followed by chemotherapy resulted in better compliance with CRT but worse compliance with chemotherapy compared with group A. Long-term follow-up will assess whether improved pCR in group B translates to better oncologic outcome.