Search

Purpose: Previous studies investigating cardiac remodeling and functional regurgitation of rhythm control for atrial fibrillation (AF) in heart failure (HF) are limited. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the impact of rhythm control for AF on cardiac remodeling and functional regurgitation in the spectrum of HF. Its effect on prognosis was explored. Methods: According to the treatment strategies of AF, the cohort was classified into the rhythm control and rate control groups. To further detect the implications of rhythm control on cardiac remodeling, functional regurgitation, and outcomes in HF subtypes, patients were further divided into HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), HF with mildly reduced ejection fraction, and HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) subgroups. Results: A total of 828 patients were enrolled, with 307 patients in the rhythm control group and 521 patients in the rate control group. Over a median follow-up time of 3.8 years, patients with rhythm control treatments experienced improvements in biatrial structure parameters, left ventricular ejection fraction, and functional regurgitation (mitral and tricuspid regurgitation) compared with rate control treatment (p < 0.05). Cox regression analysis demonstrated that rhythm control reduced the risks of all-cause mortality (HR 0.436 [95% CI, 0.218–0.871], p = 0.019) in HFpEF and HF-related admissions in HFrEF (HR 0.500 [95% CI, 0.330–0.757], p = 0.001) and HFpEF (HR 0.541 [95% CI, 0.407–0.720], p < 0.001); these associations were similar after adjusting for multiple confounders. Conclusions: Rhythm control therapy can be considered an appropriate treatment strategy for the management of AF in HF to improve cardiac remodeling, functional regurgitation, and prognosis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and Aims In patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), recurrent AF and sinus rhythm during follow-up are determined by interactions between cardiovascular disease processes and rhythm control therapy. Predictors of attaining sinus rhythm at follow-up are not well known. Methods To quantify the interaction between cardiovascular disease processes and rhythm outcomes, 14 biomarkers reflecting AF-related cardiovascular disease processes in 1586 patients in the EAST-AFNET 4 biomolecule study (71 years old, 45% women) were quantified at baseline. Mixed logistic regression models including clinical features were constructed for each biomarker. Biomarkers were interrogated for interaction with early rhythm control. Outcome was sinus rhythm at 12 months. Results were validated at 24 months and in external datasets. Results Higher baseline concentrations of three biomarkers were independently associated with a lower chance of sinus rhythm at 12 months: angiopoietin 2 (ANGPT2) (odds ratio [OR].76 [95% confidence interval.65–.89], P <.001), bone morphogenetic protein 10 (BMP10) (OR.83 [.71–.97], P =.017), and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) (OR.73 [.60–.88], P <.001). Analysis of rhythm at 24 months confirmed the results. Early rhythm control interacted with the predictive potential of NT-proBNP (P interaction =.033). The predictive effect of NT-proBNP was reduced in patients randomized to early rhythm control (usual care: OR.64 [.51–.80], P <.001; early rhythm control: OR.90 [.69–1.18], P =.453). External validation confirmed that low concentrations of ANGPT2, BMP10, and NT-proBNP predict sinus rhythm during follow-up. Conclusions Low concentrations of ANGPT2, BMP10, and NT-proBNP identify patients with AF who are likely to attain sinus rhythm during follow-up. The predictive ability of NT-proBNP is attenuated in patients receiving rhythm control. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Zeitschrift für Gerontologie und Geriatrie is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Patients with concurrent heart failure (HF) and atrial fibrillation (AF) have poor outcomes. Randomized clinical trials comparing rhythm control approaches to rate control of AF have yielded conflicting results and there is a paucity of updated and comprehensive evidence summaries to inform best practice in HF patients. We therefore conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare outcomes with rhythm versus rate control of AF in various subgroups of HF patients. In HF patients overall, we found high certainty evidence that rhythm control decreased all-cause and cardiovascular mortality (hazard ratio [HR, 95 % confidence interval] 0.64 [0.43–0.94]) and HR 0.50 [0.34–0.74] respectively). Rhythm control was associated with decreased HF hospitalization (risk ratio [RR] 0.79 [0.63–0.99], moderate certainty), but did not significantly decrease thromboembolic events (RR 0.67 [0.32–1.39], low certainty). The mean difference in left ventricular ejection fraction [LVEF] from baseline to last follow-up was greater in rhythm control group by 6.01 % [2.73–9.28 %] compared with rate control. Subgroup analyses by age, HF etiology (ischemic or non-ischemic), LVEF, presence of diabetes and hypertension did not reveal any significant differences in treatment effect. The survival and hospitalization reduction benefit of rhythm control of AF in HF patients likely reflects the success of catheter ablation especially in HF with reduced ejection fraction. These data are important to guide shared decision-making when managing AF in HF patients.

Abstract The study aims to evaluate whether rhythm control by catheter ablation is superior to medical therapy for the patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and heart failure (HF). The literatures were searched by using PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Web of Science databases up to 12 October 2023. The randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing rhythm control using catheter ablation vs. medical therapy in AF patients with HF were pooled. The primary outcomes included all‐cause mortality, HF re‐hospitalization, and stroke, and the secondary outcomes included left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), atrial tachyarrythmia recurrence, quality of life (Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire score, MLHFQ score), 6 min walking distance (6MWD), the level of N‐terminal B‐type natriuretic peptide precursor (NT‐proBNP), and adverse events. Nine RCTs involving in 2293 patients met the inclusion criteria. Compared with medical therapy, catheter ablation reduced all‐cause mortality [10.07% (121/1201) vs. 15.26% (175/1147), risk ratio (RR):0.60, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.48–0.74, P

Aims Atrial fibrillation (AF) patients frequently require active rhythm control therapy to maintain sinus rhythm and reduce symptom burden. Our study assessed whether antiarrhythmic therapies (AATs) are used disproportionately between men and women after new-onset AF. Methods and results The nationwide Finnish anticoagulation in AF registry-based linkage study covers all patients with new-onset AF in Finland during 2007–2018. Study outcomes included initiation of AATs in the form of antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs), cardioversion, or catheter ablation. The study population constituted of 229 565 patients (50% females). Women were older than men (76.6 ± 11.8 vs. 68.9 ± 13.4 years) and had higher prevalence of hypertension or hyperthyroidism, but lower prevalence of vascular disease, diabetes, renal disease, and cardiomyopathies than men. Overall, 17.6% of women and 25.1% of men were treated with any AAT. Women were treated with AADs more often than men in all age groups [adjusted subdistribution hazard ratio (aSHR) 1.223, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.187–1.261]. Cardioversions were also performed less often on women than on men aged <65 years (aSHR 0.722, 95% CI 0.695–0.749), more often in patients ≥ 75 years (aSHR 1.166, 95% CI 1.108–1.227), while no difference between the sexes existed in patients aged 65–74 years. Ablations were performed less often in women aged <65 years (aSHR 0.908, 95% CI 0.826–0.998) and ≥75 years (aSHR 0.521, 95% CI 0.354–0.766), whereas there was no difference in patients aged 65–74 years. Conclusion Women used more AAD than men in all age groups but underwent fewer cardioversion and ablation procedures when aged <65 years. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The study aims to evaluate whether rhythm control by catheter ablation is superior to medical therapy for the patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and heart failure (HF). The literatures were searched by using PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Web of Science databases up to 12 October 2023. The randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing rhythm control using catheter ablation vs. medical therapy in AF patients with HF were pooled. The primary outcomes included all‐cause mortality, HF re‐hospitalization, and stroke, and the secondary outcomes included left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), atrial tachyarrythmia recurrence, quality of life (Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire score, MLHFQ score), 6 min walking distance (6MWD), the level of N‐terminal B‐type natriuretic peptide precursor (NT‐proBNP), and adverse events. Nine RCTs involving in 2293 patients met the inclusion criteria. Compared with medical therapy, catheter ablation reduced all‐cause mortality [10.07% (121/1201) vs. 15.26% (175/1147), risk ratio (RR):0.60, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.48–0.74, P < 0.00001, I2 = 0%] and the rate of HF re‐hospitalization (RR: 0.65, P = 0.02, 95% CI: 0.45 to 0.94, I2 = 74%), but had no obvious difference in incidence of stroke (RR: 0.67, P = 0.27, 95% CI: 0.32 to 1.38, I2 = 0%). Catheter ablation enhanced LVEF [mean difference (MD), 6.26%, P < 0.00001, I2 = 89%], reduced AT recurrence (RR: 0.37, P < 0.00001, 95% CI: 0.26 to 0.52, I2 = 89%), improved the quality of life (MLHFQ score) (MD: −6.83, P = 0.003, I2 = 67%), elevated 6MWD (MD: 15.92, P = 0.006, I2 = 76%), and diminished the level NT‐proBNP (MD: −44.19, P < 0.00001, I2 = 75%), but had no significant difference in adverse events [25.81% (310/1201) vs. 30.25% (347/1147), RR: 0.81, 95% CI: 0.65–1.01, P = 0.06, I2 = 55%]. Catheter ablation as rhythm control strategy substantially enhances the survival rate, reduces HF re‐hospitalization, increases the rate of sinus rhythm maintenance, improves the left ventricular function and the quality of life for AF patients with HF, and has similar safety, compared with medical therapy. The rhythm control by catheter ablation may be a better strategy for the AF patients with HF. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The document titled "2024 ESC Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS)" provides comprehensive guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation (AF). It covers various aspects of AF, including definitions, diagnostic criteria, symptoms, patient pathways, comorbidity and risk factor management, stroke prevention, rate and rhythm control, evaluation, and dynamic reassessment. The guidelines also address specific clinical settings, such as acute coronary syndromes, stroke, pregnancy, and congenital heart disease. Additionally, it discusses screening and prevention strategies for AF. The document aims to provide evidence-based recommendations to improve the care and outcomes of patients with AF. [Extracted from the article]

Background/Objectives: Relatively little has been established about the association of rapid ventricular response (RVR) with further recurrence of atrial fibrillation (AF). This study investigated the impact of RVR on the recurrence of AF. Methods: Data were obtained from a multicenter, prospective registry of non-valvular AF patients. RVR was defined as AF with a ventricular rate > 110 bpm. The primary endpoint was the recurrence of AF, defined as the first AF detected on 12-lead electrocardiography during follow-up. Secondary endpoints included manifestation of AF during follow-up and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs), a composite of thromboembolic events, major bleeding, myocardial infarction, and death. Results: Among 5533 patients, 493 (8.9%) presented RVR. Patients with RVR were younger, had smaller left atrial diameters, and more frequently had paroxysmal AF. During the mean follow-up duration of 28.6 months, the RVR group exhibited significantly lower recurrence of AF (hazard ratio: 0.58, 95% confidence interval: 0.53–0.65, p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in the occurrence of MACEs between patients with RVR and those without RVR (0.96, 0.70–1.31, p = 0.800). AF with RVR was identified as an independent negative predictor of AF recurrence (0.61, 0.53–0.71, p < 0.001). Conclusions: In patients with AF, those with RVR had a significantly lower recurrence of AF without an increase in MACEs. RVR is a favorable marker that may benefit from early rhythm control. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Various treatment approaches for atrial fibrillation (AF) have demonstrated improved health status, yet the significance of these therapeutic interventions in individual patients remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate health status changes in patients with early AF, focusing on those who experience clinically significant deterioration after treatment initiation. We analyzed data from a multicenter, prospective registry of newly diagnosed patients with AF. One-year changes in health status across different treatment strategies were assessed by the Atrial Fibrillation Effect on QualiTy-of-life Overall Summary (AFEQT-OS) score. Clinically relevant deterioration and improvement in health status were defined as ≥5-point decrease and increase in AFEQT-OS score, respectively; no change was −5 to 5 points. Overall, 1960 patients with AF were evaluated. Mean AFEQT-OS scores at baseline and 1-year follow-up were 76.7 ± 17.7 and 85.4 ± 14.8, respectively. Although most patients (53.9%) experienced clinically important improvement, a considerable proportion had no change (28.7%) or deterioration (17.4%) in their health status. Proportions of patients with no change or deterioration varied by treatment strategy: 59.9%, 53.9%, and 32.0% in rate control, antiarrhythmic drug, and catheter ablation groups, respectively. The multivariable model identified older age, female sex, heart failure, coronary artery disease, and higher baseline AFEQT-OS score as independent predictors of worsening health status, regardless of treatment strategy. Many patients with early AF experience worsening or no change in health status irrespective of treatment strategy. Standardizing patients' health status assessment, especially for patients with comorbidities, may aid in patients' selection and their outcomes. [Display omitted] [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

AIMS: The randomized Early Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation for Stroke Prevention Trial found that early rhythm control reduces cardiovascular events in patients with recently diagnosed atrial fibrillation (AF) compared with usual care. How genetic predisposition to AF and stroke interacts with early rhythm-control therapy is not known. METHODS AND RESULTS: Array genotyping and imputation for common genetic variants were performed. Polygenic risk scores (PRS) were calculated for AF (PRS-AF) and ischaemic stroke risk (PRS-stroke). The effects of PRS-AF and PRS-stroke on the primary outcome (composite of cardiovascular death, stroke, and hospitalization for acute coronary syndrome or worsening heart failure), its components, and recurrent AF were determined.A total of 1567 of the 2789 trial patients were analysed [793 randomized to early rhythm control; 774 to usual care, median age 71 years (65-75), 704 (44%) women]. Baseline characteristics were similar between randomized groups. Early rhythm control reduced the primary outcome compared with usual care [HR 0.67, 95% CI: (0.53, 0.84), P < 0.001]. The randomized intervention, early rhythm control, did not interact with PRS-AF (interaction P = 0.806) or PRS-stroke (interaction P = 0.765). PRS-AF was associated with recurrent AF [HR 1.08 (01.0, 1.16), P = 0.047]. PRS-stroke showed an association with the primary outcome [HR 1.13 (1.0, 1.27), P = 0.048], driven by more heart failure events [HR 1.23 (1.05-1.43), P = 0.010] without differences in stroke [HR 1.0 (0.75, 1.34), P = 0.973] in this well-anticoagulated cohort. In a replication analysis, PRS-stroke was associated with incident AF [HR 1.16 (1.14, 1.67), P < 0.001] and with incident heart failure in the UK Biobank [HR 1.08 (1.06, 1.10), P < 0.001]. The association with heart failure was weakened when excluding AF patients [HR 1.03 (1.01, 1.05), P = 0.001]. CONCLUSIONS: Early rhythm control is effective across the spectrum of genetic AF and stroke risk. The association between genetic stroke risk and heart failure calls for research to understand the interactions between polygenic risk and treatment. REGISTRATION: ISRCTN04708680, NCT01288352, EudraCT2010-021258-20, www.easttrial.org.

Abstract Background There is ongoing debate around rate versus rhythm control strategies for managing atrial fibrillation (AF), however, much of the data comes from Western cohorts. Kerala‐AF represents the largest prospective AF cohort study from the Indian subcontinent. Objectives To compare 12‐month outcomes between rate and rhythm control strategies. Methods Patients aged ≥18 years with non‐transient AF were recruited from 53 hospitals across Kerala. Patients were stratified by rate or rhythm control. The primary outcome was a composite of all‐cause mortality, arterial thromboembolism, acute coronary syndrome or hospitalization due to heart failure or arrhythmia at 12 months. Secondary outcomes included bleeding events and individual components of the primary. Predictors of the composite outcome were analysed by logistic regression. Results A total of 2901 patients (mean age 64.6 years, 51% female) were included (2464 rate control, 437 rhythm control). Rates of the primary composite outcome did not differ between groups (29.7% vs 30.0%; p = .955), nor did any component of the primary. Bleeding outcomes were also similar (1.6% vs 1.9%; p = .848). Independent predictors of the primary composite outcome were older age (aOR 1.01; p = .013), BMI

Abstract Background Recent evidence suggests an elevated risk of cognitive impairment and dementia in individuals with atrial fibrillation (AF), irrespective of stroke occurrence. AF, known to reduce brain perfusion, particularly through silent cerebral ischemia, underscores the intricate relationship between cardiac and cerebral health. The heart plays a crucial role in supporting normal brain function, and rhythm control, a standard AF treatment, has demonstrated enhancements in brain perfusion. This systematic review aimed to examine published data concerning the influence of rhythm control on brain perfusion in patients with atrial fibrillation. Methods A systematic search for relevant studies was carried out in Scopus, PubMed, Cochrane Reviews, ProQuest, and EBSCOhost, spanning from their inception until April 30, 2023. Studies that specifically examined brain perfusion following any form of rhythm control in atrial fibrillation were included in the review. Results The review encompassed 10 studies involving 436 participants. Among these, six utilized electrical cardioversion for rhythm control. The majority (8 out of 10) demonstrated that restoring sinus rhythm markedly enhances brain perfusion. In one of the two remaining studies, notable improvement was observed specifically in a region closely linked to cognition. Additionally, both studies reporting data on the Mini‐Mental State Examination (MMSE) showed a consistent and significant increase in scores following rhythm control. Conclusion Successful rhythm control in AF emerges as a significant contributor to enhanced brain perfusion, suggesting a potential therapeutic avenue for reducing cognitive impairment incidence. However, further validation through larger prospective studies and randomized trials is warranted.

Background/Objectives: New-onset atrial fibrillation (AF) after cardiac surgery is associated with patient-important outcomes. Uncertainty persists regarding its prevention, detection, and management. This review seeks to identify, compile, and describe ongoing registered research studies involving patients with or at risk for post-operative AF (POAF) after cardiac surgery. Methods: We searched clinical trial registries in January 2023 for studies focusing on POAF prediction, prevention, detection, or management. We extracted data from each record and performed descriptive analyses. Results: In total, 121 studies met the eligibility criteria, including 82 randomized trials. Prevention studies are the most common (n = 77, 63.6%), followed by prediction (n = 21, 17.4%), management (n = 16, 13.2%), and detection studies (n = 7, 5.8%). POAF after cardiac surgery is an area of active research. Conclusions: There are many ongoing randomized prevention studies. However, two major clinical gaps persist; future randomized trials should compare rate and rhythm control in patients who develop POAF, and long-term follow-up studies should investigate strategies to monitor for AF recurrence in patients with POAF. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Atrial fibrillation (AF), the most common sustained cardiac arrhythmia, is not a dichotomous disease trait. Technological innovations enable long-term rhythm monitoring in many patients and can estimate AF burden. These technologies are already used to detect and monitor AF. This review describes the relation between AF burden and outcomes and potential effects of AF burden reduction. A lower AF burden is associated with a lower risk of stroke and heart failure in patients with AF: stroke risk without anticoagulation is lower in patients with device-detected AF and a low AF burden (stroke rate 1%/year) than in patients with persistent and permanent AF (stroke rate 3%/year). Paroxysmal AF shows intermediate stroke rates (2%/year). Atrial fibrillation burden–reducing interventions can reduce cardiovascular outcomes in patients with AF: early rhythm control reduces cardiovascular events including stroke and heart failure in patients with recently diagnosed AF and cardiovascular conditions. In patients with heart failure and AF, early rhythm control and AF ablation, interventions that reduce AF burden, reduce mortality and heart failure events. Recent technological innovations allow to estimate AF burden in clinical care, creating opportunities and challenges. While evidence remains limited, the existing data already suggest that AF burden reduction could be a therapeutic goal. In addition to anticoagulation and treatment of cardiovascular conditions, AF burden reduction emerges as a therapeutic goal. Future research will define the AF burden that constitutes a relevant risk of stroke and heart failure. Technologies quantifying AF burden need careful validation to advance the field. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Rheumatic heart disease with persistent atrial fibrillation (RHD‐AF) is associated with increased morbidity. However, there is no standardized approach for the maintenance of sinus rhythm (SR) in them. We aimed to determine the utility of a stepwise approach to achieve SR in RHD‐AF. Methods: Consecutive patients with RHD‐AF from July 2021 to August 2023 formed the study cohort. The stepwise approach included pharmacological rhythm control and/or electrical cardioversion (Central illustration). In patients with recurrence, additional options included AF ablation or pace and ablate strategy with conduction system pacing or biventricular pacing. Clinical improvement, NT‐proBNP, 6‐Minute Walk Test (6MWT), heart failure (HF) hospitalizations, and thromboembolic complications were documented during follow‐up. Results: Eighty‐three patients with RHD‐AF (mean age 56.13 ± 9.51 years, women 72.28%) were included. Utilizing this approach, 43 (51.81%) achieved and maintained SR during the study period of 11.04 ± 7.14 months. These patients had improved functional class, lower NT‐proBNP, better distance covered for 6MWT, and reduced HF hospitalizations. The duration of AF was shorter in patients who achieved SR, compared to those who remained in AF (3.15 ± 1.29 vs 6.93 ± 5.23, p = 0.041). Thirty‐five percent (29) maintained SR after a single cardioversion over the study period. Only one underwent AF ablation. Of the 24 who underwent pace and ablate strategy, atrial lead was implanted in 22 (hybrid approach), and 50% of these achieved and maintained SR. Among these 24, none had HF hospitalizations, but patients who maintained SR had further improvement in clinical and functional parameters. Conclusions: RHD‐AF patients who could achieve SR with a stepwise approach, had better clinical outcomes and lower HF hospitalizations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: There is ongoing debate around rate versus rhythm control strategies for managing atrial fibrillation (AF), however, much of the data comes from Western cohorts. Kerala‐AF represents the largest prospective AF cohort study from the Indian subcontinent. Objectives: To compare 12‐month outcomes between rate and rhythm control strategies. Methods: Patients aged ≥18 years with non‐transient AF were recruited from 53 hospitals across Kerala. Patients were stratified by rate or rhythm control. The primary outcome was a composite of all‐cause mortality, arterial thromboembolism, acute coronary syndrome or hospitalization due to heart failure or arrhythmia at 12 months. Secondary outcomes included bleeding events and individual components of the primary. Predictors of the composite outcome were analysed by logistic regression. Results: A total of 2901 patients (mean age 64.6 years, 51% female) were included (2464 rate control, 437 rhythm control). Rates of the primary composite outcome did not differ between groups (29.7% vs 30.0%; p =.955), nor did any component of the primary. Bleeding outcomes were also similar (1.6% vs 1.9%; p =.848). Independent predictors of the primary composite outcome were older age (aOR 1.01; p =.013), BMI <18 (aOR 1.51; p =.025), permanent AF (aOR 0.78; p =.010), HFpEF (aOR 1.40; p =.023), HFrEF (aOR 1.39; p =.004), chronic kidney disease (aOR 1.36; p <.001), and prior thromboembolism (aOR 1.31; p =.014). Conclusion: In the Kerala‐AF registry, 12‐month outcomes did not differ between rate and rhythm control cohorts. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Revista Española de Cardiología (18855857) is the property of Elsevier B.V. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Innere Medizin (2731-7080) is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Aims The aim is to describe the rationale, design, delivery, and baseline characteristics of the Stroke prevention and rhythm control Treatment: Evaluation of an Educational programme of the European society of cardiology in a cluster-Randomized trial in patients with Atrial Fibrillation (STEEER-AF) trial. Methods and results STEEER-AF is a pragmatic trial designed to objectively and robustly determine whether guidelines are adhered to in routine practice and evaluate a targeted educational programme for healthcare professionals. Seventy centres were randomized in six countries (France, Germany, Italy, Poland, Spain, and UK; 2022–23). The STEEER-AF centres recruited 1732 patients with a diagnosis of atrial fibrillation (AF), with a mean age of 68.9 years (SD 11.7), CHA2DS2-VASc score of 3.2 (SD 1.8), and 647 (37%) women. Eight hundred and forty-three patients (49%) were in AF at enrolment and 760 (44%) in sinus rhythm. Oral anticoagulant therapy was prescribed in 1543 patients (89%), with the majority receiving direct oral anticoagulants (1378; 89%). Previous cardioversion, antiarrhythmic drug therapy, or ablation was recorded in 836 patients (48.3%). Five hundred fifty-one patients (31.8%) were currently receiving an antiarrhythmic drug, and 446 (25.8%) were scheduled to receive a future cardioversion or ablation. The educational programme engaged 195 healthcare professionals across centres randomized to the intervention group, consisting of bespoke interactive online learning and reinforcement activities, supported by national expert trainers. Conclusion The STEEER-AF trial was successfully deployed across six European countries to investigate guideline adherence in real-world practice and evaluate if a structured educational programme for healthcare professionals can improve patient-level care. Clinical Trial Registration Clinicaltrials.gov , NCT04396418. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims Catheter ablation is the most effective rhythm-control option in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and is currently considered an option mainly for improving symptoms. We aimed to assess the impact of catheter ablation on hard clinical outcomes. Methods and results We performed a systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing catheter ablation vs. optimized medical treatment. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL on 8 January 2024, for trials published ≤10 years. We pooled data through risk ratio (RR) and mean differences (MDs), with 95% confidence interval (CI), and calculated the number needed to treat (NNT). Sub-group and sensitivity analyses were performed for the presence/absence of heart failure (HF), paroxysmal/persistent AF, early ablation, higher/lower quality, and published ≤5 vs. >5 years. Twenty-two RCTs were identified, including 6400 patients followed for 6–52 months. All primary endpoints were significantly reduced by catheter ablation vs. medical management: all-cause hospitalization (RR = 0.57, 95% CI 0.39–0.85, P = 0.006), AF relapse (RR = 0.48, 95% CI 0.39–0.58, P < 0.00001), and all-cause mortality (RR = 0.69, 95% CI 0.56–0.86, P = 0.0007, NNT = 44.7, driven by trials with HF patients). A benefit was also demonstrated for all secondary endpoints: cardiovascular mortality (RR = 0.55, 95% CI 0.34–0.87), cardiovascular (RR = 0.83, 95% CI 0.71–0.96), and HF hospitalizations (RR = 0.71, 95% CI 0.56–0.89), AF burden (MD = 20.6%, 95% CI 5.6–35.5), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) recovery (MD = 5.7%, 95% CI 3.5–7.9), and quality of life (MLHFQ, AFEQT, and SF-36 scales). Conclusion Catheter ablation significantly reduced hospitalizations, AF burden, and relapse, and improved quality of life. An impact on hard clinical outcomes, with an important mortality reduction and improvement in LVEF, was seen for patients with AF and HF. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background/Objectives: The effectiveness of a rhythm control strategy in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF < 50%) in real-world practice remains uncertain. Our objective was to evaluate the real-world outcomes of a rhythm control strategy in patients with AF and reduced LVEF, focusing on changes in LV systolic function and brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) levels. Methods: The study retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 80 patients with concurrent AF and reduced LVEF who underwent rhythm control therapy between March 2015 and December 2021. Results: The patients had an average age of 63.6 years and an initial LVEF of 34.3%. Sinus rhythm was restored using anti-arrhythmic drugs (38, 47.5%) or electrical cardioversion (42, 52.5%). Over a follow-up period of 53.0 months, AF recurred in 65% of patients, with 57.7% undergoing catheter ablation. Significant improvements were noted in LVEF (from 34.3% to 55.1%, p < 0.001) and BNP levels (from 752 pg/mL to 72 pg/mL, p < 0.001) at the last follow-up. Nearly all patients (97.5%) continued with the rhythm control strategy during the follow-up period. Conclusions: In real-world settings, a rhythm control strategy proves to be feasible and effective for improving LVEF and reducing BNP levels in AF patients with reduced LVEF. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common sustained cardiac arrhythmia, significantly impacting patients' quality of life and increasing the risk of death, stroke, heart failure, and dementia. Over the past two decades, there have been significant breakthroughs in AF risk prediction and screening, stroke prevention, rhythm control, catheter ablation, and integrated management. During this period, the scale, quality, and experience of AF management in China have greatly improved, providing a solid foundation for the development of the guidelines for the diagnosis and management of AF. To further promote standardized AF management, and apply new technologies and concepts to clinical practice timely and fully, the Chinese Society of Cardiology of Chinese Medical Association and the Heart Rhythm Committee of Chinese Society of Biomedical Engineering jointly developed the Chinese Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Atrial Fibrillation. The guidelines comprehensively elaborated on various aspects of AF management and proposed the CHA2DS2‑VASc‑60 stroke risk score based on the characteristics of the Asian AF population. The guidelines also reevaluated the clinical application of AF screening, emphasized the significance of early rhythm control, and highlighted the central role of catheter ablation in rhythm control. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Recent evidence suggests an elevated risk of cognitive impairment and dementia in individuals with atrial fibrillation (AF), irrespective of stroke occurrence. AF, known to reduce brain perfusion, particularly through silent cerebral ischemia, underscores the intricate relationship between cardiac and cerebral health. The heart plays a crucial role in supporting normal brain function, and rhythm control, a standard AF treatment, has demonstrated enhancements in brain perfusion. This systematic review aimed to examine published data concerning the influence of rhythm control on brain perfusion in patients with atrial fibrillation. Methods: A systematic search for relevant studies was carried out in Scopus, PubMed, Cochrane Reviews, ProQuest, and EBSCOhost, spanning from their inception until April 30, 2023. Studies that specifically examined brain perfusion following any form of rhythm control in atrial fibrillation were included in the review. Results: The review encompassed 10 studies involving 436 participants. Among these, six utilized electrical cardioversion for rhythm control. The majority (8 out of 10) demonstrated that restoring sinus rhythm markedly enhances brain perfusion. In one of the two remaining studies, notable improvement was observed specifically in a region closely linked to cognition. Additionally, both studies reporting data on the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) showed a consistent and significant increase in scores following rhythm control. Conclusion: Successful rhythm control in AF emerges as a significant contributor to enhanced brain perfusion, suggesting a potential therapeutic avenue for reducing cognitive impairment incidence. However, further validation through larger prospective studies and randomized trials is warranted. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is common among patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) with a prevalence greater than 25%. AF in HCM is associated with a high risk of stroke and can be a marker of more advanced cardiomyopathy. Although, it frequently results in cardiac hemodynamic changes which are poorly tolerated, it can be subclinical. Thus, prompt diagnosis and adequate management of AF are essential to minimizing AF-related adverse outcomes in HCM. All HCM patients should be screened for AF regularly, and those with high-risk features should be screened more frequently preferably with extended ambulatory monitoring. Once AF is detected, oral anticoagulation should be initiated. Both general and HCM-specific modifiable risk factors should be addressed and assessment for cardiomyopathy progression should be performed. Although no randomized controlled studies have compared rate versus rhythm control in HCM, early rhythm control could be considered to prevent further LA remodeling.

Abstract Aims Rhythm control therapy has shown great benefits for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and heart failure (HF). However, few studies have evaluated the effects of rhythm control on left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) trajectory across the whole HF spectrum. Our study explored the prevalence and predictors of LVEF trajectory changes and their prognostic implications following rhythm control. Methods and results Depending on the treatment strategy, the cohort was classified into rhythm and rate control groups. Alterations in HF types and LVEF trajectory were recorded. The observational endpoints were all‐cause mortality and HF‐related admission. Predictors of LVEF trajectory improvement in the rhythm control group were evaluated. After matching, the two groups had similar age [mean age (years): rhythm/rate control: 63.96/65.13] and gender [male: rhythm/rate control: n = 228 (55.6%)/233 (56.8%)]. Based on baseline LVEF measurement, the post‐matched cohort had 490 HF with preserved ejection fraction (rhythm/rate control: n = 260/230; median LVEF: 58.00%/57.00%), 99 HF with mildly reduced ejection fraction (rhythm/rate control: n = 50/49; median LVEF: 45.00%/46.00%), and 231 HF with reduced ejection fraction (rhythm/rate control: n = 100/131; median LVEF: 32.50%/33.00%). Trajectory analysis found that the rhythm control group had a greater percentage of LVEF trajectory improvement than the rate control group [80 (53.3%) vs. 71 (39.4%), P = 0.012]. Cox regression analysis also showed that the rhythm control group was more likely to have improved LVEF trajectory compared with the rate control group {hazard ratio [HR] 1.671 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.196–2.335], P = 0.003}. In the survival analysis, the rhythm control group experienced significant lower risks of all‐cause mortality [HR 0.600 (95% CI 0.366–0.983), P = 0.043] and HF‐related admission [HR 0.611 (95% CI 0.496–0.753), P

The natural history of moderate/severe atrial functional mitral regurgitation (AFMR) is unknown. The authors sought to study the incidence of left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction (LVSD), progression or regression of ≥mild-moderate AFMR, and impact on mortality. Adults with left atrial (LA) volume index ≥40 mL/m2, ≥mild-moderate AFMR, and follow-up echocardiogram were followed for incident LVSD (ejection fraction <50% and ≥10% lower than baseline), progression of mild-moderate/moderate AFMR to severe, and persistent regression of AFMR to no/trivial. Relation of AFMR progression or regression as time-dependent covariates with all-cause mortality was studied. Incidence of LVSD was compared with patients with no/mild AFMR matched on age, sex, comorbidities and ejection fraction. Patients were followed until mitral intervention, myocardial infarction, or last follow-up. A total of 635 patients (median age 75 years, 51% female, 96% mild-moderate/moderate AFMR, 4% severe AFMR) were included. Over a median 2.2 years (Q1-Q3: 1.0-4.3 years), incidence rates per 100 person-years were 3.2 for LVSD (P = 0.52 vs patients with no/mild AFMR), 1.9 for progression of AFMR, and 3.9 for regression. Female sex and larger LA volume index were independently associated with progression, whereas younger age, male sex, absent atrial fibrillation, and higher LA emptying fraction were independently associated with regression. Neither AFMR progression nor regression was independently associated with mortality. Instead, independent risk factors for mortality included older age, concentric LV geometry, and higher estimated LV filling and pulmonary pressures. In patients with predominantly mild-moderate/moderate AFMR, regression of MR was more common than progression, but neither was associated with mortality. Instead, diastolic function abnormalities were more important. Over a median 2-year follow-up, LVSD risk was not increased. [Display omitted] [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The consept of emergency departments (EDs) with specialized teams of emergency physicians originated in the United Kingdom and the United States during the 1970s and was expanded across most European countries in the twenty-first century. Among the various cardiac arrhythmias encountered in EDs, atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most prevalent, contributing to ED congestion. Existing guidelines offer multiple treatment options for acute-onset AF occurring within 48 hours. The aim of The Atrial Fibrillation Background Study is to evaluate treatment strategies, practices and the role of emergency physicians in managing acute-onset AF in Western medical tradition across Europe, the United States and China (Hong Kong). The data for this nonexperimental survey were collected through a questionnaire administered to the medical director or a senior physician at each of the 12 participating EDs. We obtained information regarding the total number of physicians employed in these EDs, their respective specialties, and the patient caseloads they managed. Additionally, we gathered data on the diagnostic and treatment protocols employed for atrial fibrillation (AF). In the investigated EDs in Hong Kong, the United Kingdom and the United States, patients were treated by emergency physicians. Comparatively, many European EDs primarily relied on physicians with traditional medical specialties. Diagnostic methods employed for acute AF ranged from point-of-care testing to comprehensive laboratory panels and echocardiography. In terms of AF treatment, rate control was the preferred approach in Hong Kong and the USA EDs, while rhythm control was preferred in European settings. Regarding rhythm control, there were considerable variations in preferences between pharmacological and electrical cardioversion methods. Findings from the AFiB Study highlight the growing significance of emergency physicians in the management ofacute AF, as well as the divergent treatment approaches for acute AF observed in EDs between Europe and the United States. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is the established cornerstone for atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation, indeed current guidelines recognize PVI as the gold standard for first-time AF ablation, regardless of if it is paroxysmal or persistent. Since 1998 when Haïssaguerre pioneered AF ablation demonstrating a burden reduction after segmental pulmonary vein (PV) ablation, our approach to PVI was superior in terms of methodology and technology. This review aims to describe how paroxysmal atrial fibrillation ablation has evolved over the last twenty years. We will focus on available techniques, a mechanistic understanding of paroxysmal AF genesis and the possibility of a tailored approach for the treatment of AF, before concluding with a future perspective. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims: Rhythm control therapy has shown great benefits for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and heart failure (HF). However, few studies have evaluated the effects of rhythm control on left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) trajectory across the whole HF spectrum. Our study explored the prevalence and predictors of LVEF trajectory changes and their prognostic implications following rhythm control. Methods and results: Depending on the treatment strategy, the cohort was classified into rhythm and rate control groups. Alterations in HF types and LVEF trajectory were recorded. The observational endpoints were all‐cause mortality and HF‐related admission. Predictors of LVEF trajectory improvement in the rhythm control group were evaluated. After matching, the two groups had similar age [mean age (years): rhythm/rate control: 63.96/65.13] and gender [male: rhythm/rate control: n = 228 (55.6%)/233 (56.8%)]. Based on baseline LVEF measurement, the post‐matched cohort had 490 HF with preserved ejection fraction (rhythm/rate control: n = 260/230; median LVEF: 58.00%/57.00%), 99 HF with mildly reduced ejection fraction (rhythm/rate control: n = 50/49; median LVEF: 45.00%/46.00%), and 231 HF with reduced ejection fraction (rhythm/rate control: n = 100/131; median LVEF: 32.50%/33.00%). Trajectory analysis found that the rhythm control group had a greater percentage of LVEF trajectory improvement than the rate control group [80 (53.3%) vs. 71 (39.4%), P = 0.012]. Cox regression analysis also showed that the rhythm control group was more likely to have improved LVEF trajectory compared with the rate control group {hazard ratio [HR] 1.671 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.196–2.335], P = 0.003}. In the survival analysis, the rhythm control group experienced significant lower risks of all‐cause mortality [HR 0.600 (95% CI 0.366–0.983), P = 0.043] and HF‐related admission [HR 0.611 (95% CI 0.496–0.753), P < 0.001]. In the rhythm control subgroup, E/e′ [odds ratio (OR) 0.878 (95% CI 0.792–0.974), P = 0.014], left ventricular end‐diastolic diameter [OR 0.874 (95% CI 0.777–0.983), P = 0.024], and CHA2DS2‐VASc score (congestive HF, hypertension, age ≥75 years, diabetes mellitus, stroke or transient ischaemic attack, vascular disease, age 65–74 years, and sex category) [OR 0.647 (95% CI 0.438–0.955), P = 0.028] were identified as three independent predictors of LVEF trajectory improvement. Conclusions: Rhythm control is associated with improved LVEF trajectory and clinical outcomes and may thus be considered the optimal therapeutic strategy for patients with both HF and AF. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Arrhythmia-induced cardiomyopathy (AIC) is characterized by the reversibility of left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction (LVSD) after rhythm restoration. This study is a cardiac magnetic resonance tomography substudy of our AIC trial with the purpose to investigate whether left ventricular fibrosis affects the time to recovery (TTR) in patients with AIC. Method: Patients with newly diagnosed and otherwise unexplainable LVSD and tachyarrhythmia were prospectively recruited. LV ejection fraction (LVEF) was measured by echocardiography at baseline and 2, 4, and 6 months after rhythm control, and stress markers were assessed. After initial rhythm control, LV fibrosis was assessed through late gadolinium enhancement (LGE). Patients were diagnosed with AIC if their LVEF improved by ≥15% (or ≥10% when LVEF reached ≥50%). Non-responders served as controls (non-AIC). Results: The LGE analysis included 39 patients, 31 of whom recovered (AIC). LV end-systolic diameters decreased and LVEF increased during follow-up. LV LGE content correlated positively with TTR (r = 0.63, p = 0.003), with less LGE favoring faster recovery, and negatively with ΔLVEF (i.e., LVEF at month 2 compared to baseline) as a marker of fast recovery (r = −0.55, p = 0.012), suggesting that LV fibrosis affects the speed of recovery. Conclusion: LV fibrosis correlated positively with the time to recovery in patients with AIC. This correlation may help in the estimation of the recovery period and in the optimization of diagnostic and therapeutic strategies for patients with AIC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: The Atrial Fibrillation Better Care (ABC) pathway is such an integrated care approach, recommended in guidelines. The aim of this service evaluation study was to evaluate the impact of implementing the ABC pathway in Iranian population. Methods: In this prospective longitudinal cohort study, consecutive patients with a diagnosis of AF were initially evaluated. Patients at baseline were evaluated in hence of adherence to ABC pathway strategy. After study enrolment, first and second follow-up service evaluations were conducted at 6 and 12 months, respectively. Results: The use of vitamin K antagonists (VKA) decreased from 25.1 % at enrolment to 13.8 % at follow-up; instead, non-VKA oral anticoagulants (NOAC) utilization increased from 40.0 % to 86.1 %, while antiplatelet treatment decreased from 34.9 % to 0 %. Use of antihypertensive drugs, ARBs, diuretics, and statins increased after implementation of the ABC pathway. Implementation of the ABC pathway approach led to a decrease in the occurrence of stroke/TIA (from 6.3 % to 2.2 %, p = 0.002), systemic thromboembolism (from 1.4 % to 0.0 %, p = 0.04), nose bleeds (from 0.8 % to 0.6 %, p = 0.04), skin bruising (from 1.2 % to 0.0 %, p = 0.002), and heart failure (from 7.7 % to 4.7 %, p = 0.04). The proportion of patients in EHRA Class I-II increased from 93.3 % at enrolment to 98.1 % at follow-up. Conclusion: In this first study from a Middle East population, compliance with ABC pathway strategy in the management of AF was associated with optimization of management and general improvements in patient outcomes during follow-up.

Background Growing evidence suggests that atrial fibrillation (AF) is an independent risk factor for cognitive impairment and dementia, even in the absence of thromboembolic events and stroke. Whether rhythm-control therapy can protect cognitive function remains unclear. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of rhythm-control strategies in patients with AF regarding cognitive function and dementia risk. Methods We systematically searched the PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library databases for randomised clinical trials, cohort and case–control studies evaluating the associations between rhythm-control strategies and cognitive function outcomes up to May 2023. We assessed the risk of bias using the ROBINS-I and the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool. Both fixed- and random-effects models were used to create summary estimates of risk. Results We included a total of 14 studies involving 193,830 AF patients. In the pooled analysis, compared with rate-control, rhythm-control therapy was significantly associated with a lower risk of future dementia (hazard ratio (HR) 0.74; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.62–0.89; I 2 = 62%). Among the rhythm-control strategies, AF ablation is a promising treatment that was related to significantly lower risks of overall dementia (HR 0.62; 95% CI 0.56–0.68; I 2 = 42%), Alzheimer's disease (HR 0.78; 95% CI 0.66–0.92; I 2 = 0%) and vascular dementia (HR 0.58; 95% CI 0.42–0.80; I 2 = 31%). Pooled results also showed that compared with patients without ablation, those who underwent AF ablation had significantly greater improvement in cognitive score (standardized mean difference (SMD) 0.85; 95% CI 0.30–1.40; P  = 0.005; I 2 = 76%). Conclusions Rhythm-control strategies, especially ablation, are effective in protecting cognitive function, reducing dementia risk and thus improving quality of life in AF patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims Different disease processes can combine to cause atrial fibrillation (AF). Their contribution to recurrent AF after ablation in patients is not known. Cardiovascular processes associated with recurrent AF after AF ablation were determined by quantifying biomolecules related to inflammation, metabolism, proliferation, fibrosis, shear stress, atrial pressure, and others in the AXAFA biomolecule study. Methods and results Twelve circulating cardiovascular biomolecules (ANGPT2, BMP10, CA125, hsCRP, ESM1, FABP3, FGF23, GDF15, IGFBP7, IL6, NT-proBNP, and hsTnT) were quantified in plasma samples obtained prior to a first AF ablation using high-throughput, high-precision assays. Cox regression was used to identify biomolecules associated with recurrent AF during the first 3 months after AF ablation. In 433 patients (64 years [58, 70]; 33% women), baseline concentrations of ANGPT2, BMP10, hsCRP, FGF23, FABP3, GDF15, and NT-proBNP were elevated in patients with recurrent AF (120/433; 28%). After adjustment for 11 clinical features and randomized treatment, elevated NT-proBNP [hazard ratio (HR) 1.58, 95% confidence interval (1.29, 1.94)], ANGPT2 [HR 1.37, (1.12, 1.67)], and BMP10 [HR 1.24 (1.02, 1.51)] remained associated with recurrent AF. Concentrations of ANGPT2, BMP10, and NT-proBNP decreased in patients who remained arrhythmia free, but not in patients with recurrent AF, highlighting their connection to AF. The other eight biomarkers showed unchanged concentrations. Conclusion Elevated concentrations of ANGPT2, BMP10, and NT-proBNP are associated with recurrent AF after a first AF ablation, suggesting that processes linked to disturbed cardiomyocyte metabolism, altered atrial shear stress, and increased load contribute to AF after AF ablation in patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia presenting in emergency departments (EDs), vastly increasing mainly due to society's lifestyles leading to numerous comorbidities. Its management depends on many factors and is still not unified. Aims: The aim of this study was to compare different AF management strategies in the ED and to evaluate their influence on the length of stay (LOS) in the ED and their safety. We analyzed medical records over 3 years of data collection, including age, primary AF diagnosis, an attempt to restore sinus rhythm, complications, and length of stay. Patients were divided into three groups according to the treatment method received: only pharmacological cardioversion (MED), only electrical cardioversion (EC), and patients who received medications followed by electrical cardioversion (COMB). We included 599 individuals in the analysis with a median age of 71. The restoration of sinus rhythm and LOS were as follows: MED: 64.95%, 173 min; COMB: 87.91%, 295 min; SH: 92.40%, 180 min. The difference between the MED and EC strategies, as well as MED and COMB, was statistically significant (p < 0.001 in both). The total number of complications was 16, with a rate of 32.67%. The majority of them followed a drug administration, and the most common complication was bradycardia. Electrical cardioversion is a safe and effective treatment strategy in stable patients with AF in the ED. It is associated with a shortened LOS. Medication administration preceded the majority of complications. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Innere Medizin (2731-7080) is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Aims: To determine the clinical and economic implications of first-line or drug-naïve catheter ablation compared to antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs), or shorter AADs-to-Ablation time (AAT) in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients in France and Italy, using a patient level-simulation model. Materials and methods: A patient-level simulation model was used to simulate clinical pathways for AF patients using published data and expert opinion. The probabilities of adverse events (AEs) were dependent on treatment and/or disease status. Analysis 1 compared scenarios of treating 0%, 25%, 50%, 75% or 100% of patients with first-line ablation and the remainder with AADs. In Analysis 2, scenarios compared the impact of delaying transition to second-line ablation by 1 or 2 years. Results: Over 10 years, increasing first-line ablation from 0% to 100% (versus AAD treatment) decreased stroke by 12%, HF hospitalization by 29%, and cardioversions by 45% in both countries. As the rate of first-line ablation increased from 0% to 100%, the overall 10-year per-patient costs increased from €13,034 to €14,450 in Italy and from €11,944 to €16,942 in France. For both countries, the scenario with no delay in second-line ablation had fewer AEs compared to the scenarios where ablation was delayed after AAD failure. Increasing rates of first-line or drug-naïve catheter ablation, and shorter AAT, resulted in higher cumulative controlled patient years on rhythm control therapy. Limitations: The model includes assumptions based on the best available clinical data, which may differ from real-world results, however, sensitivity analyses were included to combat parameter ambiguity. Additionally, the model represents a payer perspective and does not include societal costs, providing a conservative approach. Conclusion: Increased first-line or drug-naïve catheter ablation, and shorter AAT, could increase the proportion of patients with controlled AF and reduce AEs, offsetting the small investment required in total AF costs over 10 years in Italy and France. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: This study created an individual patient level simulation to estimate the clinical and economic implications of catheter ablation, which is a non-pharmacological option to treat patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). This study examines the impact of the updated 2020 ESC guidelines to managing AF in Italian and French patients comparing antiarrhythmic drug treatment to first- and second-line catheter ablation. Differences in AF-related adverse events (AEs) such as stroke, hospitalization, cardioversions, and bleeding events were considered in the model to inform the overall per-patient costs. The model was tested with 50,000 patient simulations to limit random effects. The results of the patient simulation model revealed that as the frequency of utilizing first-line catheter ablation increased from 0% to 100% compared to pharmacological treatment, AEs were reduced in both countries, resulting in a slightly increased 10-year-per-patient cost. Additionally, for patients who fail first-line pharmacological treatment, those who receive second-line catheter ablation in the next year, versus a delay of one or two years, had the highest rate of cumulative controlled patient years on rhythm control therapy and the lowest AE rate by year 10 of the model. Overall, 10-year per-patient costs were similar, regardless of whether second-line ablation was delivered with no delay or a one-or two-year delay. In conclusion, increased use of first-line catheter ablation and earlier second-line catheter ablation can reduce the rates of adverse clinical events and increase the proportion of patients with controlled AF for a similar investment in per-patient costs over 10-years. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]