1. An Electronically Delivered Patient-Activation Tool for Intensification of Medications for Chronic Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction
- Author
-
Lance Richards, Jocelyn S. Thompson, Christopher E. Knoepke, Peter M. Buttrick, David J. Magid, Grace Venechuk, Tristan J. Dow, James R. Strader, Kenneth Pierce, Robert L. Page, David P. Kao, Katy E. Trinkley, Geoffrey Harger, Larry A. Allen, Daniel D. Matlock, Pamela N. Peterson, Laura Helmkamp, Janice Huang, Colleen K. McIlvennan, and Prateeti Khazanie
- Subjects
Male ,Patient Activation ,medicine.medical_specialty ,MEDLINE ,EPIC ,Article ,Physiology (medical) ,Internal medicine ,Humans ,Medicine ,Medical prescription ,Patient participation ,Aged ,Heart Failure ,Ejection fraction ,business.industry ,Stroke Volume ,Middle Aged ,medicine.disease ,Clinical trial ,Heart failure ,Chronic Disease ,Cardiology ,Female ,Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine ,business - Abstract
Background: Major gaps exist in the routine initiation and dose up-titration of guideline-directed medical therapies (GDMT) for patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. Without novel approaches to improve prescribing, the cumulative benefits of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction treatment will be largely unrealized. Direct-to-consumer marketing and shared decision making reflect a culture where patients are increasingly involved in treatment choices, creating opportunities for prescribing interventions that engage patients. Methods: The EPIC-HF (Electronically Delivered, Patient-Activation Tool for Intensification of Medications for Chronic Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction) trial randomized patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction from a diverse health system to usual care versus patient activation tools—a 3-minute video and 1-page checklist—delivered electronically 1 week before, 3 days before, and 24 hours before a cardiology clinic visit. The tools encouraged patients to work collaboratively with their clinicians to “make one positive change” in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction prescribing. The primary endpoint was the percentage of patients with GDMT medication initiations and dose intensifications from immediately preceding the cardiology clinic visit to 30 days after, compared with usual care during the same period. Results: EPIC-HF enrolled 306 patients, 290 of whom attended a clinic visit during the study period: 145 were sent the patient activation tools and 145 were controls. The median age of patients was 65 years; 29% were female, 11% were Black, 7% were Hispanic, and the median ejection fraction was 32%. Preclinic data revealed significant GDMT opportunities, with no patients on target doses of β-blocker, sacubitril/valsartan, and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists. From immediately preceding the cardiology clinic visit to 30 days after, 49.0% in the intervention and 29.7% in the control experienced an initiation or intensification of their GDMT ( P =0.001). The majority of these changes were made at the clinician encounter itself and involved dose uptitrations. There were no deaths and no significant differences in hospitalization or emergency department visits at 30 days between groups. Conclusions: A patient activation tool delivered electronically before a cardiology clinic visit improved clinician intensification of GDMT. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT03334188.
- Published
- 2021