1. Twenty-Year Follow-up of a Randomized Study Comparing Breast-Conserving Surgery with Radical Mastectomy for Early Breast Cancer
- Author
-
Marco Greco, Natale Cascinelli, Alberto Luini, Marisel Aguilar, R. Saccozzi, Luigi Mariani, Umberto Veronesi, and Ettore Marubini
- Subjects
medicine.medical_specialty ,business.industry ,medicine.medical_treatment ,Lumpectomy ,General Medicine ,Segmental Mastectomy ,Breast Conservation Treatment ,Surgery ,Oncoplastic Surgery ,Breast-conserving surgery ,Medicine ,business ,Quadrantectomy ,Radical mastectomy ,Mastectomy - Abstract
Background We conducted 20 years of follow-up of women enrolled in a randomized trial to compare the efficacy of radical (Halsted) mastectomy with that of breast-conserving surgery. Methods From 1973 to 1980, 701 women with breast cancers measuring no more than 2 cm in diameter were randomly assigned to undergo radical mastectomy (349 patients) or breast-conserving surgery (quadrantectomy) followed by radiotherapy to the ipsilateral mammary tissue (352 patients). After 1976, patients in both groups who had positive axillary nodes also received adjuvant chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil. Results Thirty women in the group that underwent breast-conserving therapy had a recurrence of tumor in the same breast, whereas eight women in the radical-mastectomy group had local recurrences (P
- Published
- 2002
- Full Text
- View/download PDF