Search

Andreas M Pleil,1 Feyza Darendeliler,2 Helmuth G Dörr,3 Katherine Hutchinson,4 Hartmut A Wollmann5 1Pfizer Inc., San Diego, CA, USA; 2Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Pediatric Endocrinology Unit, Capa, Istanbul, Turkey; 3Department of Pediatrics, University of Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany; 4Quanticate, Hitchin, UK; 5Pfizer Ltd, Walton Oaks, UK Abstract: Previous research has reported that ease of use of and preference for a delivery device are associated with greater patient compliance – an important factor in achieving optimal therapeutic results. The objective of this study was to assess the ease-of-use of a new disposable pen (GoQuick®, Pfizer, Inc.) versus the current reusable pen (GENOTROPIN Pen®, Pfizer, Inc.) to inject a daily dose of recombinant DNA origin human growth hormone, Genotropin® (somatropin) in standard practice. In this randomized, crossover, multicenter, multinational, open-label study, ease-of-use of and preference for the two pens were assessed in three treatment-naïve populations: 1) parents of very young children; 2) parent–child dyads; and 3) adults via use of a validated self-report Injection Pen Assessment Questionnaire (IPAQ) after 2 months of at-home-use experience. The primary endpoint was the proportion of participants who reported the new disposable pen to be no different from or easier to use than the current reusable pen. Safety was also assessed and reported according to local legal requirements. Of the 120 screened patients, 119 were included in the ease-of-use analysis and all were included in the safety analyses. In all, 67.2% found the new somatropin disposable pen to be no different from or easier to use than the reusable pen (95% confidence interval: 58.8–75.7). Most adverse events were mild or moderate. No deaths or device- or treatment-related serious adverse events were reported. These results suggest that improvements made to the reusable somatropin pen are tangible and recognizable to treatment-naïve patients and their caregivers, child–caregiver dyads, and adults, and may positively impact continued compliance with therapy. Registry information: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01112865. Keywords: somatropin, disposable injection pen, ease-of-use, Injection Pen Assessment Questionnaire, preference, recombinant human growth hormone

Background: Current recombinant human growth hormone (r-hGH) replacement therapy involves long-term daily subcutaneous injections to treat growth hormone deficiency (GHD) in children and adults. Daily r-hGH injections can be burdensome, often resulting in poor treatment compliance. Clinical outcome assessments (COAs) can capture the burden of these injections from the patient (and caregiver) perspective and may demonstrate the benefit of a less-frequent r-hGH injection regimen, which may ultimately improve treatment compliance and long-term outcomes., Objective: To address this knowledge gap, qualitative research was conducted to inform the development of a new Life Interference Questionnaire for Growth Hormone Deficiency (LIQ-GHD), designed to measure the experiences of patients taking r-hGH GHD injections. A second objective was to evaluate the hypothesized factor structure and preliminary performance of the LIQ-GHD in a cross-sectional observational study., Methods: An empirical literature review and expert advice meetings were conducted to inform development of the draft LIQ-GHD (pediatric and adult versions). In-person concept elicitation and cognitive debriefing interviews were conducted with GHD patients (and patient dyads including caregivers) to explore and confirm concept coverage and evaluate respondents' ability to understand the questionnaire. The draft LIQ-GHD was then tested in a cross-sectional field study involving pediatric and adult patients receiving daily r-hGH injections for GHD. The factor structure, reliability, and validity were analyzed for the overall sample and for pediatric, adolescent, and adult subgroups., Results: Results from the literature review and input from six experts were used to develop and refine the LIQ-GHD, with content covering pen ease of use; regimen convenience; life interference due to regimen; benefit/satisfaction/willingness to continue treatment; regimen choice/preference; intent to comply with regimen; injection-related signs/symptoms; and reasons for missed injections. Twenty-one patient interviews confirmed comprehensive concept coverage and patient/caregiver comprehension of the LIQ-GHD. A total of 224 patients (n = 70 children/caregiver dyads, n = 79 adolescents/caregiver dyads, n = 75 adults) participated in the field study. While most items showed floor effects, confirmatory factor analysis fit statistics were good for the overall sample (root mean square error of approximation = 0.07, comparative fit index = 0.98) and for the full pediatric sample after dropping co-dependent questions from the model. Cronbach's alpha (α) ranged from 0.746 to 0.905 and intra-class correlation coefficients ranged from 0.761 to 0.918 for the overall sample on LIQ-GHD domains. Scores correlated as predicted with an existing criterion measure in the overall sample and LIQ-GHD domain scores distinguished known groups as expected., Conclusions: The LIQ-GHD is a new COA for the measurement of r-hGH injection treatment burden. This research provides evidence supporting its content validity, hypothesized factor structure, score reliability, and construct validity in pediatric and adult populations.

: Standard-of-care treatment for haemophilia A or B is to maintain adequate coagulation factor levels through clotting factor administration. The current study aimed to evaluate annualised bleeding rates (ABR) and treatment adherence for haemophilia A or B patients receiving standard half-life (SHL) vs. extended half-life (EHL) factor replacement products. We analysed data from the Adelphi Disease-Specific Programmes, a health record-based survey of United States and European haematologists. Analysis included 651 males with moderate-to-severe haemophilia A or B (the United States, n = 132; Europe, n = 519). The haemophilia A analysis included 501 patients (SHL, n = 435; EHL, n = 66). In the combined United States/European population, mean (SD) ABR was 1.7 (1.69) for the SHL group and 1.8 (2.00) for the EHL group. A total of 72% of patients receiving SHL factor VIII and 75% of patients receiving EHL factor VIII in the combined population were fully adherent (no doses missed of the last 10 doses), as reported by physicians. The haemophilia B analysis included 150 patients (SHL, n = 114; EHL, n = 36). The mean (SD) ABR in the combined population was 2.1 (2.16) for patients receiving SHL factor IX (FIX) and 1.4 (1.48) for patients receiving EHL FIX. The percentage of fully adherent patients (physician-reported) was similar in both treatment groups (SHL FIX, 68%; EHL FIX, 73%). In this preliminary real-world survey in a relatively small sample of patients, measures of ABR and adherence between SHL and EHL products were evaluated. Additional real-world research on prescribing patterns, SHL vs. EHL effectiveness, and adherence is warranted.

Purpose: To identify international units (IUs) dispensed and consequent expenditures for standard half-life (SHL) versus extended half-life (EHL) recombinant factor VIII (rFVIII) replacement products in hemophilia A patients in a real-world setting., Design: Two U.S. claims databases were analyzed., Methodology: Number of IUs dispensed and quarterly expenditures for rFVIII products were collected from the Optum Clinformatics Data Mart and Truven Health MarketScan Databases. Truven claims were also analyzed for factor IUs dispensed and expenditures for patients with data for ≥3 months before and after switching to an EHL product., Results: The Optum and Truven databases, respectively, included 276 (SHL, n=243; EHL, n=33) and 500 (SHL, n=409; EHL, n=91) hemophilia A patients. Median quarterly factor IUs dispensed in Optum were 10% higher with EHL versus SHL products over nine quarters, and 45% higher with EHL versus SHL products in Truven over 10 quarters. Median quarterly expenditures in the EHL cohort were 51% (individual quarterly medians range, 1%-101%) higher than in the SHL cohort in Optum and 122% higher (individual quarterly medians range, 1%-189%) in Truven. Twenty-nine Truven patients switched to an EHL product; median factor IUs dispensed varied quarterly. The lowest SHL and highest EHL values occurred in the quarter immediately before switching and the first quarter post-switch, respectively. Overall median quarterly expenditures were higher post-switch; this was consistent over seven quarters., Conclusion: We found higher expenditures over two years for hemophilia A patients using EHL versus SHL products. Switching to an EHL rFVIII product was associated with variable factor IUs dispensed and consistently higher expenditures.

Background: Hemophilia B requires replacement therapy with factor IX (FIX) coagulation products to treat and prevent bleeding episodes. A recently introduced extended half-life (EHL) recombinant FIX replacement product provided the opportunity to compare the amount of dispensed factor and expenditures for EHL treatment compared with a standard half-life (SHL) product., Objective: To determine factor international units (IUs) dispensed and expenditures associated with switching from nonacog alfa, the most commonly used SHL replacement product, to eftrenonacog alfa, an EHL FIX replacement product., Methods: Two U.S. claims databases were analyzed. A large national specialty pharmacy dispensation claims database was used to identify the number of IUs dispensed and monthly charges for all patients with hemophilia B from April 2015 to June 2016. Truven Health MarketScan Research Databases (January 2010-July 2016) were used to identify IUs and expenditures for patients with claims data for at least 3 months before and after switching from the SHL to the EHL product. Medians for IUs and expenditures are presented to accommodate for skewness of data distribution., Results: The national specialty pharmacy database analysis included 296 patients with moderate or severe hemophilia B (233 on SHL; 94 on EHL). Median monthly factor dispensed was 11% lower (2,142 IU) in the EHL versus SHL cohort over the study period, while individual monthly reductions ranged from 32% to 47% (9,838 IU to 16,514 IU). Using the wholesale acquisition cost, the median per-patient monthly factor expenditures over the 15-month study period were 94% higher ($23,005) for the EHL than for the SHL product. Individual median monthly expenditure differences ranged from 15% ($6,562) to 49% ($19,624). In the Truven database, 14 patients switched from the SHL to the EHL product. The amount of factor dispensed was variable; in the 1-year period before and after the switch from the SHL to the EHL product, mean IUs dispensed decreased by 3,005 IU, while median IUs dispensed increased by 4,775 IU. Factor replacement expenditures were higher after switching from the SHL to the EHL product in each of the 3-month periods examined before versus after the switch., Conclusions: This analysis of real-world data showed that switching from the SHL to the EHL product was associated with higher expenditures. Increased expenditures noted in the first 3 months after switching may be related to initial stocking up of the EHL product, but expenditures were sustained throughout the 1-year period of data analysis. Further analysis of these findings with larger numbers of patients should be explored., Disclosures: This study was sponsored by Pfizer. Pfizer employees were involved in the study design; the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; the review of the manuscript; and the decision to submit for publication. All authors are employees of Pfizer. No author received an honorarium or other form of payment related to the development of this manuscript. All authors participated in the study design, data interpretation, and manuscript review and revisions and granted approval for the submission of the manuscript. Alvir, McDonald, and Tortella also participated in data analysis. Data from this paper were presented in part at the European Association for Haemophilia and Allied Disorders Annual Meeting, February 1-3, 2017, Paris, France; at the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research Annual Meeting, May 20-24, 2017, Boston, MA; and at the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis Congress, July 8-13, 2017, Berlin, Germany.

Background: Patient-reported outcome (PRO) instruments for children and adolescents are often included in clinical trials with the intention of collecting data to support claims in a medical product label., Objective: The purpose of the current task force report is to recommend good practices for pediatric PRO research that is conducted to inform regulatory decision making and support claims made in medical product labeling. The recommendations are based on the consensus of an interdisciplinary group of researchers who were assembled for a task force associated with the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR). In those areas in which supporting evidence is limited or in which general principles may not apply to every situation, this task force report identifies factors to consider when making decisions about the design and use of pediatric PRO instruments, while highlighting issues that require further research., Good Research Practices: Five good research practices are discussed: 1) Consider developmental differences and determine age-based criteria for PRO administration: Four age groups are discussed on the basis of previous research (<5 years old, 5-7 years, 8-11 years, and 12-18 years). These age groups are recommended as a starting point when making decisions, but they will not fit all PRO instruments or the developmental stage of every child. Specific age ranges should be determined individually for each population and PRO instrument. 2) Establish content validity of pediatric PRO instruments: This section discusses the advantages of using children as content experts, as well as strategies for concept elicitation and cognitive interviews with children. 3) Determine whether an informant-reported outcome instrument is necessary: The distinction between two types of informant-reported measures (proxy vs. observational) is discussed, and recommendations are provided. 4) Ensure that the instrument is designed and formatted appropriately for the target age group. Factors to consider include health-related vocabulary, reading level, response scales, recall period, length of instrument, pictorial representations, formatting details, administration approaches, and electronic data collection (ePRO). 5) Consider cross-cultural issues., Conclusions: Additional research is needed to provide methodological guidance for future studies, especially for studies involving young children and parents' observational reports. As PRO data are increasingly used to support pediatric labeling claims, there will be more information regarding the standards by which these instruments will be judged. The use of PRO instruments in clinical trials and regulatory submissions will help ensure that children's experience of disease and treatment are accurately represented and considered in regulatory decisions., (Copyright © 2013 International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: To examine the psychometric properties of the Injection Pen Assessment Questionnaire (IPAQ) including the following: 1) item and scale characteristics (e.g., frequencies, item distributions, and factor structure), 2) reliability, and 3) validity., Methods: Focus groups and one-on-one dyad interviews guided the development of the IPAQ. The IPAQ was subsequently tested in 136 parent-child dyads in a Phase 3, 2-month, open-label, multicenter trial for a new Genotropin(®) disposable pen. Factor analysis was performed to inform the development of a scoring algorithm, and reliability and validity of the IPAQ were evaluated using the data from this two months study. Psychometric analyses were conducted separately for each injection pen., Results: Confirmatory factor analysis provides evidence supporting a second order factor solution for four subscales and a total IPAQ score. These factor analysis results support the conceptual framework developed from previous qualitative research in patient dyads using the reusable pen. However, the IPAQ subscales did not consistently meet acceptable internal consistency reliability for some group level comparisons. Cronbach's alphas for the total IPAQ score for both pens were 0.85, exceeding acceptable levels of reliability for group comparisons., Conclusions: The total IPAQ score is a useful measure for evaluating ease of use and preference for injection pens in clinical trials among patient dyads receiving hGH. The psychometric properties of the individual subscales, mainly the lower internal consistency reliability of some of the subscales and the predictive validity findings, do not support the use of subscale scores alone as a primary endpoint.

Purpose: To compare vision function and self-reported quality of life (QoL) in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME) treated with intravitreous pegaptanib 0.3 mg or sham injection., Methods: This randomized (1:1), controlled, multicenter trial included subjects with DME (center point thickness on OCT, ≥ 250 μm) and visual acuity (VA) ≤ 65 letters and ≥ 35 letters. In year 1, pegaptanib or sham was administered every 6 weeks with focal/grid photocoagulation at investigator discretion after week 18. Subjects received injections as often as every 6 weeks per pre-specified criteria in year 2. Primary efficacy endpoint: proportion gaining ≥10 letters of VA from baseline to week 54. Change in QoL from baseline to weeks 54 and 102 was assessed with the 25-item National Eye Institute-Visual Function Questionnaire (NEI-VFQ 25) and the EQ-5D., Results: One hundred thirty-three pegaptanib- and 127 sham-treated subjects were in the year 1 intent-to-treat population. From baseline to week 54, ≥ 10 letter gains seen in 49 (36.8%) pegaptanib- and 25 (19.7%) sham-treated subjects (odds ratio [95% CI]: 2.38 [1.32-4.30]; P = 0.0047). At 2 years, the VA trend favored pegaptanib. The NEI-VFQ 25 domains of Near Vision, Distance Vision, and Social Functioning (week 54) and Distance Vision, Social Functioning, Mental Health, and Composite Score (week 102) demonstrated clinically meaningful (>5-point between-group difference) and statistically significant (P < 0.05) benefits favoring pegaptanib. No significant difference in the mean change in generic EQ-5D-weighted utility scores was seen., Conclusions: The VA improvement from pegaptanib treatment versus sham is reflected by improved vision-related QoL as reported by the DME patient (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00605280).

PURPOSE. To develop standardized descriptions of health states that characterize vision-specific functional impacts of diabetic retinopathy (DR) according to levels of visual acuity and contrast sensitivity and to elicit preferences for these health states from persons with DR and assign weighted values to them. METHODS. Vision-specific descriptions of health states were developed based on a literature review and patient and physician interviews. The content was based on items from the National Eye Institute Visual Functioning Questionnaire (VFQ) and reflected functional impacts experienced by DR patients. Values were assigned to the range of health states, anchored by the extremes full vision and death, by using the time-tradeoff method in a sample of 98 Canadian DR patients from three clinical centers. RESULTS. The mean age of the sample was 60.4 years, and 56% were men. Mean preferences decreased from 0.98 (better-eye logMAR [Snellen equivalent] acuity, > or =20/40; worse-eye Snellen equivalent, > or =20/200) to 0.67 (Snellen equivalent visual acuity, < or =20/200, contrast sensitivity, < or =21 letters bilaterally). Preferences decreased with increasing severity of functional deficits and did not vary significantly by sex, age, VFQ quartile, or better- or worse-eye acuity. CONCLUSIONS. This is the first study that has been conducted to estimate preferences for standardized DR-specific health states, accounting for visual acuity and contrast sensitivity in both eyes. The results showed that the development and progression of DR are associated with substantial declines in preferences. In addition to the progressively greater impact from declining ETDRS visual acuity and contrast sensitivity, preference weights declined with increasing bilateral disparity. These preference values are useful for comparing the cost effectiveness of ophthalmic treatments.

Purpose: In this study, we explored different statistical approaches to identify the best algorithm to predict EQ-5D utility scores from the NEI-VFQ 25 in patients with age-related macular degeneration (AMD)., Methods: Ordinary least squares (OLS), Tobit, and censored least absolute deviation (CLAD) approaches were compared using cross-sectional data (primary dataset, n = 151) at screening from a phase I/II clinical trial in patients with AMD. Three models were specified in this study: full (includes all 12 dimensions of the NEI-VFQ 25), short (includes only the general health dimension and the composite score), and reduced model (using stepwise regression). To evaluate the predictive accuracy of the models, the mean absolute prediction error (MAPE), mean error, and root means squared error were calculated using in-sample cross-validation (within the primary dataset) and out-of-sample validation using an independent dataset (n = 393). The model that provided the lowest prediction errors was chosen as the best model., Results: In-sample cross-validation and out-of-sample validation consistently demonstrated that, compared to other approaches, heteroscedasticity-adjusted OLS produced the lowest MAPE (mean values were 0.1400, 0.1593, respectively) for the full model, while CLAD performed best for the short and reduced models (mean values were 0.1299, 0.1483, respectively). The normality and homoscedasticity assumptions of both OLS and Tobit were rejected. CLAD, however, can accommodate these particular violations., Conclusions: The CLAD-short model is recommended for producing the EQ-5D utility scores when only the NEI-VFQ 25 data are available.

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) with verteporfin has been used less comprehensively in the treatment of exudative age-related macular degeneration (AMD), and specifically of choroidal neovascularization (CNV), since the advent of antiangiogenic therapies. Recently, there has been a renewed interest in PDT as an adjunct to these and other agents in the treatment of neovascular AMD. In light of this new development and the European Medicines Evaluation Agency's (EMEA) recent labelling decision to rescind approval for the use of PDT in occult CNV lesions, the present systematic review was undertaken to revisit the evidence supporting its clinical application. Photodynamic therapy provided the first pharmacological treatment for patients suffering from subfoveal CNV, the major cause of severe vision loss in AMD. Key clinical trials evaluating efficacy and safety have examined patients with all lesion subtypes, with the primary labelled indication (i.e. lesions containing a classic component of > or = 50% ) deriving from the results of the Treatment of Age-related Macular Degeneration with Photodynamic Therapy (TAP) Study. The subsequent TAP Study Group post hoc categorization of lesions as predominantly classic is open to question, however, as it appears that the overall efficacy in this group only may have reflected the especially strong response in 100% classic lesions. Based on a subgroup analysis of the Verteporfin in Photodynamic Therapy Study, the indication for PDT subsequently was expanded in some jurisdictions, including that of the EMEA, to include occult lesions with no classic component. However, the subsequent Visudyne in Occult Study found no benefit in 100% occult lesions, resulting in the EMEA rescinding its approval for this indication.

Objective: To compare the cost-effectiveness of pegaptanib and usual care within three distinct cohorts of subfoveal neovascular age-related macular degeneration (NV-AMD) patients, that is, those with early, moderate, and late disease, using a comprehensive economic model., Methods: A Markov framework was used to model lifetime movement of a subfoveal NV-AMD cohort through health states based on visual acuity. The model takes a US payer perspective of patients over the age of 65 years. Clinical efficacy was based on published results for the 0.3 mg pegaptanib and usual care groups. Expert interviews were conducted to determine adverse event treatment patterns and vision rehabilitation resource use. Incidence and costs of comorbidities such as depression and fractures associated with the effects of declining visual acuity were based on our previously published analysis of Medicare data. Transition probabilities were derived from published clinical trial data for each 3-month cycle. Utilities were derived from published sources. Three runs of the model were conducted with cohorts of newly diagnosed patients. Patients were classified as having early, moderate, or late NV-AMD defined as visual acuity in the better-seeing eye of 20/40 to more than 20/80, 20/80 to more than 20/200, and 20/200 to more than 20/400, respectively. Costs and outcomes were discounted 3.0% per annum., Results: Incremental costs per vision-year gained and per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained for early NV-AMD patients were approximately one-third those of patients with late disease ($15,279 vs. $57,230 and $36,282 vs. $132,381, respectively). On average, patients treated early with either pegaptanib or usual care incurred lower lifetime total direct costs than those treated later. Sensitivity analysis showed that base-case incremental costs per QALY gained for pegaptanib versus usual care were relatively robust., Conclusions: For patients with subfoveal NV-AMD, treatment with pegaptanib should be started as early as possible to maximize the clinical and economic benefits.

Objective: Overactive bladder (OAB) has substantial impact on health-related quality of life (HRQoL). The purpose of this research was to evaluate the psychometric properties of the King's Health Questionnaire (KHQ)., Methods: The KHQ (n = 1284) was administered at baseline and 12 weeks post-treatment in a multinational, double-blind, randomized clinical trial of tolterodine for treatment of OAB. Country-specific psychometric analyses of HRQoL instruments were performed. Countries demonstrating marginal psychometric properties on the KHQ were pooled with same-language countries, re-evaluated, and aggregate analysis performed on the pooled data., Results: Internal consistency of the KHQ was high, item characteristics were good, most assumptions of summed scales were met, and it is externally valid and consistent. Few problems with the KHQ were noted although the performance of the personal relationships domain was complicated by the 'not applicable' response category., Conclusions: Psychometric testing supports the reliability and validity of the KHQ as an OAB-specific measure of HRQoL.

Clinical guidelines recommend the use of extended out-of-hospital thromboprophylaxis in patients who have had major arthroplasty. However, the cost-effectiveness of prolonging pharmacological thromboprophylaxis into the out-of-hospital phase following hip replacement surgery remains the subject of considerable debate. This debate centers on the clinical relevance of the 'surrogate' venographic endpoints that have been used in most clinical trials and used to generate some of the cost analyses of thromboprophylaxis. The objective of this study was to estimate, from the payer perspective, the direct medical costs of prolonging the duration of thromboprophylaxis with dalteparin from 1 week to 28-35 days in patients undergoing hip replacement, and to compare these to the costs associated with using 'standard' in-hospital thromboprophylaxis with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) or warfarin. To derive 'best' estimates for rates of clinically and economically relevant thromboembolism associated with hip replacement surgery (i.e. those that would in reality incur management costs), we used data on the prevalence of both symptomatic and asymptomatic deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE). These estimates were used in conjunction with diagnostic-related groups (DRG) reimbursement rates and a dalteparin cost model, which assumed home-based self-administration for prolonged thromboprophylaxis, to calculate overall direct medical costs of prolonged vs. in-hospital thromboprophylaxis. The management costs of the strategies evaluated were, to the nearest 1000 Euros: 465 000 Euros for in-hospital prophylaxis with LMWH; 339 000 Euros for in-hospital prophylaxis with warfarin; and 368 000 Euros for prolonged prophylaxis with dalteparin. For every 1000 patients treated, prolonging thromboprophylaxis with dalteparin from 1 to 4-5 weeks will avoid 30 clinical DVTs and 18 PEs at a saving of 2000 Euros per clinical event. Compared with in-hospital warfarin, prolonged thromboprophylaxis with dalteparin will avoid 28 DVTs and four PEs at an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of 900 Euros per clinical event avoided. We consider that investment in prolonged thromboprophylaxis with dalteparin is justified for the improvement in clinical outcomes produced.

Objective: To evaluate the long-term effects of tolterodine on the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of patients diagnosed with overactive bladder with incontinence., Methods: Patients who completed a 12-week randomized, double-blind, safety and efficacy trial comparing tolterodine with placebo were invited to enroll in a 12-month open-label continuation trial to assess the long-term safety and efficacy of tolterodine. This study reports the HRQoL results from the King's Health Questionnaire (KHQ) and the Short Form-36 (SF-36) that were administered at baseline, at the end of the 12-week trial, and 3 and 12 months following open-label treatment with tolterodine., Results: One thousand seventy-seven patients were included in the intent-to-treat (ITT(B)) population. KHQ translations were available for 838 patients (mean age, 61.1 years; 80.9% women) in the ITT(B) population. HRQoL, as measured by the KHQ, significantly improved from baseline to months 3 and 12 on the following domains: incontinence impact, role limitations, physical limitations, social limitations, personal relationships, emotions, sleep and energy, severity (coping) measures, and symptom severity. Improvements were generally consistent across all analyses for the 3- and 12-month measurements and for the ITT(B) and completer (C(B)) populations. Patients receiving tolterodine in the double-blind study showed additional improvement at the 3-month open-label assessment on all but the general health domain. At 12 months from treatment rollover, all improvements from rollover to 3 months were sustained with additional improvement seen on the incontinence impact and role limitations domains. The general health perceptions domain showed a slight decline from rollover that might be attributable to a natural decline in patients' health status at this life stage. These findings were consistent with other efficacy results whereby efficacy was maintained over the 12-month open-label period. SF-36 results were consistent with previous experience of reduced sensitivity, as population groups were similar to the SF-36 Physical Component and Mental Component scores at various time points and with all populations., Conclusion: Continued treatment with tolterodine provides additional benefits in HRQoL as measured by the KHQ. Of particular importance are improvements on the psychological aspects after longer-term treatment not detected after a short-term trial. Treatment effects on HRQoL are evident even after a 12-week placebo run-in supporting the true clinical effect of active treatment.

Objective: To compare the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of overactive bladder (OAB) patients foilowing treatment with tolterodine extended-release (ER) 4 mg once daily versus placebo., Study Design: Multinational, placebo-controlled, randomized, double-blind 12-week study., Population: Patients with urinary frequency ( > or = 8 micturitions/24 hours over a 7-day period), urge incontinence ( > or = 5 episodes/week), and symptoms of OAB for at least 6 months were eligible for inclusion. Patients (81% female) received oral therapy with tolterodine ER (n = 507) or placebo (n = 508) for 12 weeks., Outcomes Measured: HRQoL was assessed using the King's Health Questionnaire (KHQ) and Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 36-item questionnaire (SF-36). Patients also rated their bladder condition. Assessments were performed at baseline and at the end of treatment., Results: At end of treatment, KHQ domains selected a priori as primary HRQoL end points (incontinence impact and role limitations) significantly improved (P < or = .001) with tolterodine ER. Domains selected a priori as secondary end points (physical limitations, sleep and energy, severity [coping] measures, and symptom severity) were also significantly improved (P < or = .006) following treatment with tolterodine ER. The tolterodine ER group had decreased symptom severity and statistically significant improvements in patient rating of bladder control compared with the placebo group at end of treatment. No treatment differences were detected using the SF-36., Conclusion: Many aspects of HRQoL, as measured by the KHQ, showed statistically significant improvement following treatment with tolterodine ER. These HRQoL improvements were consistent with clinical efficacy benefits. Patients receiving tolterodine ER experienced overall improvement in their condition that was associated with an important impact on their HRQoL.

Study Objective: To compare hospital length of stay (LOS), weekly discharges, and days of antibiotic treatment with linezolid (intravenous with oral follow-up) and vancomycin (intravenous only)., Design: Multinational, randomized, phase III trial., Settings: Hospitals in North America, Latin America, and Europe., Patients: Four hundred sixty hospitalized patients with infections of known or suspected methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus species., Intervention: Administration of linezolid or vancomycin., Measurements and Main Results: For linezolid recipients, median LOS was 5 and 8 days shorter (p=0.05 and 0.003) in the complicated skin and soft tissue infection intent-to-treat (230 patients) and clinically evaluable (144) samples, and slightly but not significantly shorter in the overall intent-to-treat (460) and clinically evaluable (254) samples. In all samples, linezolid recipients had more discharges in the first week of treatment and fewer days of intravenous therapy than vancomycin recipients., Conclusion: Our results support linezolid's ability to reduce medical resource use.

Objective: To determine the cost of using systemic therapy to treat newly diagnosed cytomegalovirus (CMV) retinitis in persons with AIDS., Design: Incidence-based simulation model of CMV treatment from a government payer perspective., Setting: Swiss healthcare system., Patients and Participants: Patients with AIDS and newly diagnosed CMV retinitis., Interventions: Patients were assigned to 1 of 4 treatment regimens for induction and maintenance therapy: (i) intravenous (IV) cidofovir induction and maintenance (cidofovir IV/IV); (ii) IV foscarnet induction and maintenance (foscarnet IV/IV); (iii) IV ganciclovir induction and maintenance (ganciclovir IV/IV); and (iv) IV ganciclovir induction and oral (PO) ganciclovir maintenance (ganciclovir IV/PO). Following a second relapse, patients were assigned to one of the other regimens., Main Outcome Measures: Time to first and subsequent progression, duration of maintenance treatment and direct medical expenditures [1998 Swiss francs (SwF)] ., Results: The median time to first progression was longest for cidofovir IV/IV, followed by foscarnet IV/IV, ganciclovir IV/IV and ganciclovir IV/PO. Mean survival was 13 months and mean costs for this period in the base case were lowest in those initially treated with cidofovir (SwF146,742), followed by initial treatment with foscarnet IV/IV (SwF194,809), ganciclovir IV/PO (SwF195,190) and ganciclovir IV/IV (SwF243,964). Costs were most sensitive to changes in efficacy estimates., Conclusions: Of the regimens studied, initiation of treatment with systemic cidofovir appears least costly over a 13-month period.

Quality of life is a fascinating field to researchers and practitioners alike. To some researchers, quality of life is of interest because it offers untold challenges in constructing instruments and capturing data necessary to answer key questions about health, disease, and treatment. For such researchers, quality of life is about statistical relationships among questions and about using questions to define the physical, social, and emotional domains of health. To other researchers, this field is about finding practical applications in policy and treatment decision making for the information provided by quality of life assessments. To these researchers, the focus of quality of life is on ways to apply knowledge of quality of life differences between groups with and without specific diseases or ways to use knowledge about how treatments affect the quality of life of various patient populations. To practitioners, quality of life is about treatment outcomes that impact individual patients' daily lives. It is the practitioner that Funderburk, Pleil, and Pathak are considering in their paper in this issue of Pharmacy Practice Management Quarterly. These authors give several important messages to practitioners seeking to serve their patients by incorporating quality of life into their practices. The key message in the paper is that to better understand and determine the impact of treatment on a patient's quality of life, it is critical to start with a baseline or reference point relevant to that patient. From that baseline or reference point, treatment decisions can be made and progress, in quality of life terms, can be evaluated. Critical questions in their framework, which is called the IN*COMPASS (Individualized Client Oriented Method for Preferred Alleviation of Sickness States) Approach, are "How are you now?" and "How would you like to be?" The authors do not endorse particular quality of life tools in their approach; rather they prescribe certain critical questions that must be answered if information captured by any quality of life tool is to be useful at the patient level. Readers should not be put off by the fancy acronym used in this paper; nor must readers be keen students of quality of life to appreciate its message. The IN*COMPASS approach is fundamental to good patient care and can be applied by practitioners with any level of understanding of and appreciation for quality of life assessments.

Objective: The goal of this study was to characterize primary care patients with false positive results on screens for mental disorders., Method: A sample of 1,001 primary care patients completed self-administered screens and structured interviews for DSM-IV diagnoses., Results: A substantial proportion of the patients with false positive screen results for at least one diagnosis met the diagnostic criteria for other psychiatric disorders. They also had significantly greater functional impairment and higher rates of recent use of mental health services than the subjects with true negative results on the screens., Conclusions: Although the positive predictive values of screens for specific mental disorders are in line with those of other medical screens, false positive results are not uncommon. This may be due in part to the sensitivity of brief screening instruments to nonspecific symptoms. The results suggest that as with other screens used in primary care, patients with false positive results on screens for mental disorders should receive clinical attention.

The objectives of this study were: (1) to compare total hospital charges for a sample of cadaveric renal transplant patients categorized according to the type of induction therapy used (Orthoclone OKT3 Sterile Solution or Atgam Sterile Solution); (2) to compare specific charge categories between the two groups; and (3) to examine the relationship between charges and a set of independent variables. A retrospective review was conducted of hospital charges associated with a sample of renal transplant patients. The overall sample for this study comprised 510 patient discharges from 22 hospitals in the United States. Comparisons between the OKT3 and Atgam groups were made for total and specific charge categories using two different approaches to help control variations in charges that were not related to the type of induction therapy used. The first approach consisted of t test or chi-square comparisons between the groups for subsets of observations that had been identified in a stepwise fashion. These judgment samples were defined to remove sources of variation in charges other than those resulting from the type of induction therapy selected. The second approach used multiple linear regression analysis to help statistically control variation in charges from other sources. The results showed that higher drug charges in the Atgam group were offset by lower charges in other categories (P < 0.05). These findings suggest that hospital formulary committees should consider all relevant costs, not just drug acquisition costs, when selecting products. However, further investigation is warranted to explore differences in charges due to: (1) between-hospital variation; (2) patients' severity of illness before receiving induction therapy; and (3) differences in side-effect profiles for the two induction therapies.

The continuing increase in health care costs has focused more attention on the value associated with a therapeutic intervention in addition to its clinical efficacy and safety. Although safety and efficacy are important, the effectiveness of an intervention in practice is the yardstick for assessing a therapy's societal benefit. In measuring effectiveness outcomes, all the relevant costs and benefits must be considered, including those that extend beyond the direct costs of care. Patient quality of life and, related to it, work productivity are two additional outcomes worthy of consideration. This article presents a discussion of several economic approaches to measuring indirect costs, the relationship between indirect costs and quality of life, and the relevance of such evaluations in the area of mental health, and offers recommendations for researchers.

The purpose of this study was to determine what differences exist in the content of commercial drug compendium monographs available in First World and Third World countries. A content model representing First World information was developed from monographs contained in the Physicians' Desk Reference, ABPI Data Sheet Compendium, and the Rote Liste. The content of the three First World compendia was found to be variable, with the Physicians' Desk Reference consistently more comprehensive than either the ABPI or Rote Liste. This result suggests that there is a lack of agreement among industrialized countries regarding what amount of information is necessary or appropriate for inclusion in a commercial drug compendium. A sample of 58 monographs was selected from four Third World compendia and evaluated in terms of comprehensiveness and accuracy. These monographs represented five commonly prescribed drugs from the World Health Organization's Essential Drugs List. The monographs were found to be less comprehensive than any of the three monographs contained in the First World compendia. Approximately 5 percent of the information contained in the sampled monographs was determined to be inaccurate. The sampled monographs for drugs supplied by multi-national pharmaceutical firms were found to contain the same amount of information as those for drugs supplied by domestic firms.