Back to Search Start Over

Real-world outcomes associated with standard half-life and extended half-life factor replacement products for treatment of haemophilia A and B.

Authors :
Chhabra A
Spurden D
Fogarty PF
Tortella BJ
Rubinstein E
Harris S
Pleil AM
Mellor J
de Courcy J
Alvir J
Source :
Blood coagulation & fibrinolysis : an international journal in haemostasis and thrombosis [Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis] 2020 Apr; Vol. 31 (3), pp. 186-192.
Publication Year :
2020

Abstract

: Standard-of-care treatment for haemophilia A or B is to maintain adequate coagulation factor levels through clotting factor administration. The current study aimed to evaluate annualised bleeding rates (ABR) and treatment adherence for haemophilia A or B patients receiving standard half-life (SHL) vs. extended half-life (EHL) factor replacement products. We analysed data from the Adelphi Disease-Specific Programmes, a health record-based survey of United States and European haematologists. Analysis included 651 males with moderate-to-severe haemophilia A or B (the United States, n = 132; Europe, n = 519). The haemophilia A analysis included 501 patients (SHL, n = 435; EHL, n = 66). In the combined United States/European population, mean (SD) ABR was 1.7 (1.69) for the SHL group and 1.8 (2.00) for the EHL group. A total of 72% of patients receiving SHL factor VIII and 75% of patients receiving EHL factor VIII in the combined population were fully adherent (no doses missed of the last 10 doses), as reported by physicians. The haemophilia B analysis included 150 patients (SHL, n = 114; EHL, n = 36). The mean (SD) ABR in the combined population was 2.1 (2.16) for patients receiving SHL factor IX (FIX) and 1.4 (1.48) for patients receiving EHL FIX. The percentage of fully adherent patients (physician-reported) was similar in both treatment groups (SHL FIX, 68%; EHL FIX, 73%). In this preliminary real-world survey in a relatively small sample of patients, measures of ABR and adherence between SHL and EHL products were evaluated. Additional real-world research on prescribing patterns, SHL vs. EHL effectiveness, and adherence is warranted.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1473-5733
Volume :
31
Issue :
3
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Blood coagulation & fibrinolysis : an international journal in haemostasis and thrombosis
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
32271314
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1097/MBC.0000000000000885