Search

Cristina Bermejo Boixareu,1,&ast; Cristina Ojeda-Thies,2,&ast; Ainhoa Guijarro Valtueña,3 Bernardo Abel Cedeño Veloz,4 María Gonzalo Lázaro,4 Laura Navarro Castellanos,5 Rocío Queipo Matas,5,6 Paloma Gómez Campelo,5 Ana Royuela Vicente,7 Juan Ignacio González-Montalvo,5,8 Pilar Sáez-López5,9,10 1Geriatrics Department, Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda University Hospital, Madrid, Spain; 2Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology Department, 12 de Octubre University Hospital, Madrid, Spain; 3Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda University Hospital, Madrid, Spain; 4Geriatrics Department, University Hospital of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain; 5La Paz Institute for Health Research - IdiPAZ, Hospital Universitario La Paz - Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain; 6European University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain; 7Biostatistics Unit, Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda University Hospital, IDIPHISA, CIBERESP, Madrid, Spain; 8Geriatrics Department, La Paz University Hospital, Madrid, Spain; 9Geriatrics Department, Fundación Alcorcón University Hospital, Madrid, Spain; 10Spanish National Hip Fracture Registry, Madrid, Spain&ast;These authors contributed equally to this workCorrespondence: Cristina Bermejo Boixareu, Geriatrics Department, Puerta de Hierro University Hospital, Madrid, Spain, Email cristina_bermejo@hotmail.comObjective: The primary objective was to describe the clinical characteristics, management, and outcomes of centenarians with fragility hip fracture and compare them to other age groups. The secondary objective was to determine the variables associated with length of stay, in-hospital mortality and 30-day mortality.Materials and Methods: This is a secondary analysis of the Spanish National Hip Fracture Registry. We included patients ≥ 75 years admitted for fragility hip fractures in 86 Spanish hospitals between 2017 and 2019, dividing the sample into four age groups. The variables studied were baseline characteristics, type of fracture, management, length of stay, in-hospital mortality and 30-day mortality.Results: We included 25,938 patients (2888 were 75– 79 years old; 14,762 octogenarians; 8,035 nonagenarians and 253 centenarians). Of the centenarians, 83% were women, 33% had severe dementia, 9% had severe dependency and 36% lived in residential care homes. Six out of ten had intertrochanteric fracture. Length of hospital stay was 8.6 days; in-hospital mortality was 10.3% and 30-day mortality 20.9%. Older age groups had more women, severe functional dependency, severe dementia, intertrochanteric fracture, living in care facilities and being discharged to nursing care. They had less frequent early mobilization, osteoporosis treatment and discharge to rehabilitation units. In-hospital and 30-day mortality were higher with increasing age. In centenarians, time to surgery > 48 hours was independently associated with length of stay (correlation coefficient 3.99 [95% CI: 2.35– 5.64; p< 0.001]) and anaesthetic risk, based on an ASA score of V, was related to 30-day mortality (ASA score II [OR 0.25, 95% CI: 0.09– 0.70; p=0.009] and ASA score III [OR 0.43, 95% CI: 0.19– 0.96; p=0.039]).Conclusion: Centenarians had different clinical characteristics, management and outcomes. Although centenarians had worse outcomes, nearly 4 out of 5 centenarians were alive one month after surgery.Keywords: centenarians, fracture, registry, mortality, ASA grade

Comparing the characteristics of hip fracture patients as per their pre-fracture place of residence, patients from aged care facilities vs. community dwellers, at baseline, during hospitalization and 1-month post-fracture in 75 hospitals in Spain. The results suggest that their baseline situation, the care process during hospitalization and the therapeutic recommendations at discharge are all different, and that at 1-month follow-up, older adults admitted from aged care facilities fare disproportionately worse. New studies are needed to evaluate whether a common protocol emphasizing the characteristics of each group can reduce the differences regarding post-fracture decline of ambulatory status between individuals from aged care facilities and community dwellers. One in four hip fracture patients comes from an aged care facility. This study aimed to compare the characteristics of these subjects with their community-dwelling counterparts at baseline, during hospitalization and 1-month post-fracture. We analyzed data from a cohort of older adults admitted with hip fractures to 75 Spanish hospitals, collected prospectively in the Spanish National Hip Fracture Registry between 2016 and 2018. We classified participants according to pre-fracture residence: community dwellers vs. aged care facilities residents. We collected demographic records at baseline, along with variables relating to in-hospital evolution and discharge to geriatric rehabilitation units. Patients or relatives were interviewed at 1-month follow-up. Out of 18,262 patients, 4,422 (24.2%) lived in aged care facilities. Aged care facilities residents were older (median age: 89 vs. 86 years), less mobile (inability to walk independently: 20.8% vs. 9.4%) and had more cognitive impairment (Pfeiffer’s SPMSQ > 3, 75.3% vs. 34.8%). They were more likely to receive conservative treatment (5.4% vs. 2.0%) and less likely to be mobilized early (58.2% vs. 63.0%). At discharge, they received less vitamin D supplements (68.5% vs. 72.4%), less anti-osteoporotic medication (29.3% vs. 44.3%), and were referred to geriatric rehabilitation units less frequently (5.4% vs. 27.5%). One-month post-fracture, 45% of aged care facilities residents compared to 28% of community dwellers experienced a severe gait decline. Aged care facilities residents had a higher one-month mortality (10.6% vs. 6.8%). Hip fracture patients from aged care facilities are more vulnerable than their community-dwelling peers and are managed differently both during hospitalization and at discharge. Gait decline is disproportionately higher among those admitted from aged care.

Resumen Cada vez es mayor el numero de pacientes de edad avanzada que esta siendo tratado por especialidades diferentes a la geriatria, las cuales, por las caracteristicas de sus tratamientos, necesitan conocer el pronostico que tiene su indicacion en los pacientes ancianos fragiles y optimizar la situacion de estos pacientes para mejorar dicho pronostico. Las mas frecuentes, actualmente, son oncologia y hematologia, cardiologia, cirugia general y otros servicios quirurgicos. Se entiende por geriatria transversal la ampliacion del area de conocimiento y atencion de la geriatria en sentido horizontal, fuera de sus unidades habituales, aplicando los principios de la medicina geriatrica con un enfoque multidisciplinar al terreno de otros servicios que atienden a pacientes muy mayores y fragiles con enfermedades graves, con el objetivo de ofrecer una atencion centrada en la persona y mejorar su manejo integral. La valoracion geriatrica y la deteccion de la fragilidad en estos casos aportan informacion pronostica y ayudan en la toma de decisiones y en la seleccion de un tratamiento individualizado. En algunos casos es posible mejorar la evolucion de los pacientes y la eficiencia del sistema sanitario. En este articulo se revisan estos conceptos, se describen algunos modelos existentes, se mencionan los instrumentos mas empleados para esta funcion y se resumen algunas actividades de esta nueva area de la asistencia geriatrica. Es previsible que cada vez en mas hospitales se solicite a los servicios de geriatria la implementacion de este tipo de valoraciones e intervenciones. Existe informacion basica para su puesta en marcha, pero no la suficiente como para considerar que estan respondidas todas las preguntas que se plantean. Sera, pues, en los proximos anos un nuevo reto para esta especialidad.

National hip fracture registries have been established in several countries and recent publications show that the care process has been audited inspecting the representativeness according to quality standards. The aim of this study was to analyse if the Spanish National Hip Fracture Registry (RNFC) represents the Spanish population aged 75 and older admitted for hip fractures, and to compare its results regarding the care process with the national average, according to the National Inpatient register (Minimum Basic Dataset, CMBD).The 2017-2018 National Minimum Basic Dataset (Conjunto Mínimo Básico de Datos, CMBD) was used as reference. For analysis, we included 83,110 cases from the CMBD and 21,130 from the RNFC. Eight common variables of both registries were selected for comparison.No significant differences were observed in the patient-related common variables (age, sex, type of fracture and fracture side), but statistically significant differences were found in the variables describing the care process (proportion of patients operated, deceased, surgical procedures and postoperative length of stay).The RNFC, designed as a convenience sample, is also representative of the population of patients aged 75 and older treated for hip fractures in Spain. However, there is a participation bias related to the professionals and the hospitals interested in voluntarily participating in a quality improvement program, which would explain the better results observed in the care process, compared to the national average as collected by the CMBD.Los registros nacionales de fracturas de cadera se han establecido en varios países y publicaciones recientes muestran que el proceso de atención ha sido auditado para explorar su representatividad de acuerdo a estándares de calidad. El objetivo de este trabajo fue analizar si el Registro Nacional de Fracturas de Cadera (RNFC) es representativo de la población española de 75 o más años de edad ingresada por fractura de cadera, y comparar los resultados acerca del proceso asistencial con la media nacional según el Conjunto Mínimo Básico de Datos (CMBD).Se empleó el CMBD de los años 2017-2018 como referencia. Para el análisis se incluyeron 83.110 casos del CMBD y 21.130 del RNFC. Se seleccionaron ocho variables comunes a ambos registros para ser comparadas.No se observaron diferencias significativas en las variables comunes paciente-dependientes (edad, sexo, tipo y lado de fractura), pero se hallaron diferencias significativas en las variables que describían el proceso asistencial (proporción de pacientes intervenidos, fallecidos, tipos de procedimiento quirúrgico y estancia postoperatoria).El RNFC, diseñado como muestra de conveniencia, es también representativa de la población de pacientes de 75 y más años, atendida por fractura de cadera en España. Sin embargo, existe un sesgo de participación relacionado con los profesionales y los hospitales interesados en participar voluntariamente en un programa voluntario de mejora de calidad que podría explicar los mejores resultados observados en el proceso asistencial, comparado con la media nacional según se recoge por el CMBD.

This study was carried out to analyze the evolution of the quality indicators in the Spanish National Hip Fracture Registry, after disseminating a series of recommendations based on available clinical practice guidelines to the participating hospitals. Six of the seven proposed quality indicators showed a significant improvement.The Spanish National Hip Fracture Registry (RNFC) arises from the need to know the process and improve the quality of care. Our goal was to analyze the changes in the RNFC's quality indicators after an intervention based on disseminating specific recommendations among the participating hospitals, following available clinical practice guidelines.Study comparing before and after performing an intervention in hospitals participating in the RNFC. Data from the hospitals that registered cases in 2017, and that kept registering cases in 2019. Seven quality indicators were chosen, and a standard to be achieved for each indicator was proposed. The intervention consisted in the dissemination of 25 recommendations with practical measures to improve each quality indicator, based on available clinical practice guidelines, by drafting and publishing a scientific paper and sending it via email and printed cards. Fulfilment of each quality indicator was measured after carrying out the intervention.Forty-three hospitals registered 2674 cases between January and May, 2017, and 8037 during 2019. The quality indicators chosen and the degree of compliance were (all with p0.05): (1) surgery ≤48 h increased from 38.9 to 45.8%; (2) patients mobilised on the first postoperative day increased from 58.9 to 70.3%; (3) patients with anti-osteoporotic medication at discharge increased from 34.5 to 49.8%; (4) patients with calcium supplements at discharge increased from 48.7 to 62.8%; (5) patients with vitamin D supplements at discharge increased from 71.5 to 84.7%; (6) patients developing a grade2 pressure ulcer during admission decreased from 6.5 to 5.0%; (7) patients able to move on their own at 1 month fell from 58.8 to 56.4%. More than 48% of hospitals improved the proposed indicators.Establishing quality indicators and standards and intervening through the dissemination of specific recommendations to improve these indicators achieved an improvement in hospital performance results on a national level.

The disease produced by SARS-CoV-2 has led to severe situations and mortality in elderly people. The objective of this study was to describe the collaboration between hospital professionals and nursing homes when applying preventive measures for the transmission of COVID-19 and in the assistance of institutionalized patients.A descriptive study was carried out in 4 centers with information collected by researchers in two moments of the COVID-19 pandemic. The information collected was related to the resources and knowledge of infection prevention, details about face-to-face and telematic assistance from the hospital team, as well as material, drugs provided, and clinical results. The variables studied were described by means of percentages, absolute frequencies and ratios; statistical chi-square tests and McNemar'test were used.The study was conducted in 4 centers with a total of 640 residents and an initial occupancy between 62% and 85%. Differences were found regarding the ratio of staff and knowledge of preventive measures of the transmission of SARS-CoV-2 infection, which was improved in the second period of the study. The number of face-to-face visits (from 5 to 22) and telematic visits (between 42 and 109 patients) were different in the 4 nursing homes, as well as the material provided, adapted to the needs of each center. The percentage of infected patients ranged from 6.1% to 90.2%, and the accumulated mortality in the second period ranged from 15.38% to 38.35% of the residents at the beginning of the pandemic.The collaboration between the professionals of healthcare centers and the hospital, adapted to the needs of each center, has allowed to improve the assistance to the residents and the coordination between the professionals, optimizing the available resources.La enfermedad producida por SARS-CoV-2 ha provocado situaciones de mayor gravedad y mortalidad en las personas mayores. El objetivo de este estudio fue describir la colaboración entre profesionales del hospital y de las residencias en la aplicación de medidas de prevención de la transmisión de COVID- 19 y en la asistencia de pacientes institucionalizados.Se realizó un estudio descriptivo en 4 centros sociosanitarios con información recogida por los investigadores en dos momentos de la pandemia por COVID-19. Se recogió información relacionada con los recursos y conocimiento de la prevención de infecciones, detalles sobre la asistencia presencial y telemática del equipo del hospital, así como material, fármacos suministrados y resultados clínicos. Las variables estudiadas se describieron mediante porcentajes, frecuencias absolutas y ratios y se utilizaron las pruebas estadísticas de chi cuadrado y el test de Mc-Nemar.Se realizó el estudio en 4 centros con un total de 640 residentes y una ocupación inicial entre el 62% y 85%. Se encontraron diferencias respecto al ratio de personal, conocimiento de medidas de prevención de transmisión de la infección por SARS-Cov 2, mejorando este último en el segundo periodo de estudio. El número de consultas presenciales (de 5 a 22) y telemáticas (entre 42 y 109 pacientes) fueron diferentes en las 4 residencias, así como el material aportado, adaptándonos a las necesidades de cada centro. El porcentaje de pacientes contagiados varió entre el 6,1% y el 90,2% y la mortalidad acumulada en el segundo periodo osciló entre el 15,38% y el 38,35% de los residentes que había al principio de la pandemia.La colaboración entre los profesionales de los centros sociosanitarios y del hospital adaptada a las necesidades de cada centro ha permitido mejorar la asistencia a los residentes y la coordinación entre los profesionales, optimizando los recursos disponibles.

Although medicine is currently protocol-based, there are still differences in the management of the hip fracture in Spain, especially regarding surgical delay, type of anesthesia, early mobilization, and discharge destinations. This data will be of great value to assist stakeholders in formulating health policies. Analysis of demographic, clinical, surgical, and functional data of the Spanish National Hip Fracture National Registry (RNFC), during admission and at 1-month follow-up, by Autonomous Communities (ACs). Cross-sectional analysis in the framework of a RNFC cohort, from January 2017 to May 2018, including 15 ACs from Spain, with 1 month of follow-up. Sociodemographic, clinical, surgical, and outcome variables were analyzed. In total, 13,839 patients were analyzed. There were significant differences (p

Age is the biggest risk factor for colorectal cancer, with 70% of the cases in patients over 70 years old. For this reason, a review is presented on the surgical treatment and chemotherapy of cancer of colon and rectum in the elderly. A search was performed in PubMed, including words such as elderly, surgery, colorectal cancer, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and oncogeriatrics, and review articles and originals on treatment of colorectal cancer in the elderly were selected. A narrative form was developed from the latest evidence with the results obtained on the treatment of this pathology. Although the treatment of colorectal cancer is standardised, a prior comprehensive geriatric assessment is required in the case of the elderly, before deciding the type of treatment in order to offer these robust elderly-standardised guidelines for the robust elderly and adapt them for use in fragile patients.

Increasing numbers of older persons are being treated by specialties other than Geriatric Medicine. Specialists turn to Geriatric Teams when they need to accurately stratify their patients' risk and prognosis, predict the potential impact of their, often, invasive interventions, optimise their clinical status, and contribute to discharge planning. Oncology and Haematology, Cardiology, General Surgery, and other surgical departments are examples where such collaborative working is already established, to a varying extent. The use of the term "Cross-speciality Geriatrics" is suggested when geriatric care is provided in clinical areas traditionally outside the reach of Geriatric Teams. The core principles of Geriatric Medicine (comprehensive geriatric assessment, patient-centred multidisciplinary targeted interventions, and input at point-of-care) are adapted to the specifics of each specialty and applied to frail older patients in order to deliver a holistic assessment/treatment, better patient/carer experience, and improved clinical outcomes. Using Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment methodology and Frailty scoring in such patients provides invaluable prognostic information, helps in decision making, and enables personalised treatment strategies. There is evidence that such an approach improves the efficiency of health care systems and patient outcomes. This article includes a review of these concepts, describes existing models of care, presents the most commonly used clinical tools, and offers examples of excellence in this new era of geriatric care. In an ever ageing population it is likely that teams will be asked to provide Cross-specialty Geriatrics across different Health Care systems. The fundamentals for its implementation are in place, but further evidence is required to guide future development and consolidation, making it one of the most important challenges for Geriatrics in the coming years.

This study was carried out to describe the profile of prescription of antiosteoporotic treatment at discharge after a hip fracture in the Spanish National Hip Fracture Registry. Prescription rates among hospitals ranged from 0 to 94% of patients discharged. The prescription rate was higher among patients with better cognitive and functional baseline status. National hip fracture registries are useful for assessing current care processes. The goals of this study were as follows: first, to know the rate of antiosteoporotic prescription at discharge among hip fracture patients in hospitals participating in the Spanish National Hip Fracture Registry (RNFC); second, to compare the differences between treated and non-treated patients; third, to analyze patients’ characteristics associated with antiosteoporotic prescription at discharge; and fourth, to evaluate whether there were differences in the profile of patients discharged from hospitals with high and low prescription rates. Patients discharged after a fragility hip fracture in 2017 and participating in the RNFC were included. Demographic variables, cognitive and functional status, prefracture osteoporosis treatment, fracture type, anesthetic risk, hospital volume, and antiosteoporotic prescription at discharge were analyzed. Given that patients were clustered within hospitals, intraclass correlation was calculated and generalized estimating equations were fitted. A total of 6701 patients from 54 hospitals were included. Antiosteoporotic prescription at discharge was prescribed to 36.5% (CI95% 35.8–37.2%), with a wide inter-hospital variability (range 0–94%). The intraclass correlation due of clustering of patients within hospitals was 47.9%. Antiosteoporotic prescription was more likely in patients who were younger, lived at home, previously treated for osteoporosis, had better baseline functional and cognitive status, lower anesthetic risk, and were discharged from high-volume hospitals, all with p

Summary Hip fracture registries have helped improve quality of care and reduce variability, and several audits exist worldwide. The results of the Spanish National Hip Fracture Registry are presented and compared with 13 other national registries, highlighting similarities and differences to define areas of improvement, particularly surgical delay and early mobilization. Introduction Hip fracture audits have been useful for monitoring current practice and defining areas in need of improvement. Most established registries are from Northern Europe. We present the results from the first annual report of the Spanish Hip Fracture Registry (RNFC) and compare them with other publically available audit reports. Method Comparison of the results from Spain with the most recent reports from another ten established hip fracture registries highlights the differences in audit characteristics, casemix, management, and outcomes. Results Of the patients treated in 54 hospitals, 7.208 were included in the registry between January and October 2017. Compared with other registries, the RNFC included patients ≥ 75 years old; in general, they were older, more likely to be female, had a worse prefracture ambulation status, and were more likely to have extracapsular fractures. A larger proportion was treated with intramedullary nails than in other countries, and spinal anesthesia was most commonly used. With a mean of 75.7 h, Spain had by far the longest surgical delay, and the lowest proportion of patients mobilized on the first postoperative day (58.5%). Consequently, development of pressure ulcers was high, but length of stay, mortality, and discharge to home remained in the range of other audits. Conclusions National hip fracture registries have proved effective in changing clinical practice and our understanding of patients with this condition. Such registries tend to be based on an internationally recognized common dataset which would make comparisons between national registries possible, but variations such as age inclusion criteria and follow-up are becoming evident across the world. This variation should be avoided if we are to maximize the comparability of registry results and help different countries learn from each other’s practice. The results reported in the Spanish RNFC, compared with those of other countries, highlight the differences between countries and detect areas of improvement, particularly surgical delay and early mobilization.

Our objective was to analyze the incidence and trend of hip fracture in Spain and its distribution by Autonomous Community (AC). In Spain, the age-adjusted incidence rate of hip fracture is decreasing. There is great variability in the incidence and tendency of hip fracture among the different ACs. Genetic, demographic, and climatic factors and cohort effect factors of the civil war explain 96% of this variability. In Spain, there is great variability between the different Autonomous Communities (ACs) in the incidence of hip fracture. The objectives of our study are (1) to estimate the incidence rate and trend of hospital admissions for hip fracture in Spain and by ACs and (2) to analyze risk factors/markers that could explain the variability in the incidence and trend between different ACs. This work includes 2 studies (TREND-HIP and VAR-HIP). TREND-HIP: retrospective, national, observational study based on the administrative database of the National Health System that includes a Minimum Basic Data Set (MBDS) of hospital admissions. VAR-HIP: ecological study based on the analysis of the results obtained in TREND-HIP study, with different risk factors/markers obtained from different sources. In the 17 years included in the analysis, there were 744,848 patients diagnosed with hip fracture. The global age-adjusted rate of hip fracture at the national level was 315.38/100,000 person*year (95% CI 312.36–317.45); by AC, the rate varied from 213.97 in the Canary Islands to 363.13 in the Valencia and Cataluna communities. We observe an east-west gradient in Spain. The trend for both sexes was − 0.67% (95% CI 0.9990–0.9957) (p

Background The Spanish National Hip Fracture Registry (or Registro Nacional de Fractura de Cadera, RNFC) is a database of hip fracture patients admitted to Spanish hospitals. Its goals include assessment and continuous improvement of the care process. Objectives To (1) establish a series of indicators, (2) evaluate their initial fulfillment, (3) propose quality standards, (4) suggest recommendations to facilitate standards compliance, and (5) monitor the indicators. Method The indicators fulfilled the criteria of (1) evaluating the process or outcome, (2) being clinically relevant for patients, (3) being modifiable through changes in healthcare practice, and (4) being considered important by the RNFC participants. The first quartile obtained by the group of hospitals in each of the respective variables was proposed as the standard. The Indicators Advisory Committee (IAC) elaborated a list of recommendations for each indicator, based on the available evidence. Results Seven indicators were chosen. These indicators (its baseline compliance vs. the standard to be reached, respectively) were: the proportion of patients receiving surgery within 48 h (44% vs. 63%), mobilized the first postoperative day (56% vs. 86%), with antiosteoporotic medication at discharge (32% vs. 61%), with calcium supplements at discharge (46% vs. 77%), with vitamin D supplements at discharge (67% vs. 92%), who developed pressure ulcers during hospitalization (7.2% vs. 2.1%) and with independent mobility at 30 days (58% vs. 70%). The IAC has established 25 recommendations for improving care. Conclusion The indicators and standards chosen are presented, as well as the list of recommendations. This process completes the first step to improve quality of care. The results will be evaluated 6 months after implementing the recommendations.

Hip fractures (HF) are prevalent and involve high morbidity and mortality so improving their management is important. HF registries are a good way to improve knowledge about this condition and its quality of care, while at the same time reducing clinical variability, optimizing efficiency, improving outcomes, and reducing costs. Hip fractures (HF) are a prevalent fragility fracture secondary to osteoporosis that involves high morbidity and mortality. They are low-impact fractures, resulting from a fall from a standing or sitting height. Despite numerous Clinical Practice Guidelines that establish uniform recommendations for their care, great variability persists regarding clinical and healthcare outcomes. Fracture registries can help detect deficits and establish measures to improve care. The objective of this work is to analyze the contents that a HF registry should have and to compare the characteristics of some national HF registries. A literature search was conducted on several national hip fracture registries, and those that contain relevant information on the variables and their outcomes were selected. The selected HF registries were compared using the parameters they measure as well as the outcomes in the different countries. The variables collected in the majority of the databases and those that give useful information are as follows: sociodemographic variables (age, sex, place of residence), clinical variables (function before and after HF, anesthesia risk as measured by the ASA score, type of fracture, type of surgery and anesthesia, and in-hospital and 1-month mortality), and healthcare variables (pre-operative and overall stay, presence of collaboration with orthogeriatrics or with any clinician in addition to the surgeon, secondary prevention of new fractures by assessing the fall risk, and need for osteoporosis treatment). The recording of HF cases in different countries improves knowledge about handling this condition and its quality of care, while at the same time reducing clinical variability, optimizing efficiency, improving outcomes, and reducing costs. The debate on the variables that should be recorded is timely, such as organizing how to collect each measurement, and even trying to unify the national and international registries or using a current proposal such as the one from the Fragility Fracture Network.

Background Frailty is a geriatric syndrome that predicts the onset of disability, morbidity and mortality in elderly people; it is a state of pre-disability and is reversible. The aim of this review is to assess how nutrition influences both the risk of developing frailty and its treatment. Data sources We searched two databases, PubMed and Web of Science. We included epidemiologic studies and clinical trials carried out on people aged over 65 years. We included 32 studies with a total of over 50,000 participants. Results The prevalence of frailty is ranges from 15% among elderly people living in the community to 54% among those hospitalized. Furthermore, the prevalence of frailty is disproportionately high among elderly people who are malnourished. Malnutrition, which is very prevalent in geriatric populations, is one of the main risk factors for the onset of frailty. A good nutritional status and, wherever necessary, supplementation with macronutrients and micronutrients reduce the risk of developing frailty. Physical exercise has been shown to improve functional status, helps to prevent frailty and is an effective treatment to reverse it. Despite the relatively large number of studies included, this review has some limitations. Firstly, variability in the design of the studies and their different aims reduce their comparability. Secondly, several of the studies did not adequately define frailty. Conclusions Poor nutritional status is associated with the onset of frailty. Screening and early diagnosis of malnutrition and frailty in elderly people will help to prevent the onset of disability. Effective treatment is based on correction of the macro- and micronutrient deficit and physical exercise.

Objective To ascertain the current situation and clinical variability of the provision of care for Hip Fracture (HF) in Spain and the factors related to it by using a National Registry (NHFR) with high patient numbers and territorial representation NHFR, and to compare results on a national and international level and propose standards and criteria to improve healthcare quality. Design Continuous registry for at least three years of a representative sample of patients admitted to Spanish hospitals due to HF using the Minimum Common Dataset - international Fragility Fracture Network (FFN) MCD, adapted for Spanish. Study scope and subjects all patients over the age of 74 years who are hospitalized with a diagnosis of a fragility HF at the participating hospitals distributed throughout the Spanish territory. Initially 48 hospitals are included, and we expect to incorporate the highest number of sites possible. Results It is expected to ascertain the current situation of provision of care for HF in Spain. Each hospital will be offered information regarding their results and their situation compared to the rest. The results from national hospitals will be compared to others included in the registry and to hospitals abroad, which use the same database. Variability will be studied, care standards will be established, and objectives will be proposed for the continuous improvement of the care process of this condition.

Resumen Introduccion La fractura de cadera del anciano se asocia con elevada comorbilidad, por lo que requiere un enfoque integral y multidisciplinar. Objetivo Evaluar el efecto de una intervencion de mejora de calidad en la deteccion y tratamiento de complicaciones del anciano que ingresa por fractura de cadera. Material y metodos Estudio comparativo entre dos cohortes de pacientes ingresados por fractura de cadera antes (2010) y despues de instaurar una via clinica (2013). La intervencion consistio en la implantacion de protocolos para el manejo de los problemas mas prevalentes, segun la evidencia cientifica actual y se evaluo el grado de cumplimiento de las medidas implementadas. Resultados Las caracteristicas de los pacientes ingresados por fractura de cadera en 2010 (216 pacientes) y 2013 (196 pacientes) fueron similares en edad, sexo, indice de Barthel e indice de Charlson abreviado, aunque con mayor numero de comorbilidades en el 2013. Tras la implantacion de los protocolos, se incremento la deteccion de delirium, desnutricion, anemia y trastornos electroliticos, aumentando la prescripcion de hierro por via intravenosa (en un 24%) y de tratamiento para la osteoporosis (61,3%). La estancia media se redujo un 45,3% y la demora quirurgica un 29,4%, consiguiendose una mejor eficiencia funcional. Conclusion La aplicacion de una via clinica en el proceso asistencial del paciente geriatrico con fractura de cadera es util no solo para detectar y tratar de forma precoz las complicaciones sino tambien para reducir la estancia prequirurgica y global, todo ello sin repercusion negativa en el aspecto clinico y funcional.

The benefits of the collaboration between orthopaedics and geriatrics in the management and care of elderly patients admitted with hip fracture have been widely demonstrated. A questionnaire was sent to all hospital geriatricians of Castilla y Leon in order to determine the characteristics this collaboration between orthopaedics and geriatrics in the public hospitals of Castilla y Leon. They were asked about the type of collaboration with orthopaedics in the care of the elderly patient admitted with hip fracture and details of the treatment of the complications. Most of the hospitals maintain a high level of orthogeriatric collaboration with geriatricians, and the geriatrician attends to most of the medical complications of these patients. The average hospital stay is 10 days, with a surgical delay of 3 days. Management of the most frequent clinical problems in hospitals of Castilla y Leon are detailed in this article, comparing them with the latest articles and current recommendations from clinical practice guides.

Resumen Objetivos La descompresion del nervio mediano mediante la apertura del retinaculo flexor se considera un tratamiento satisfactorio en pacientes afectos del sindrome del tunel carpiano. No obstante, diversos factores como la edad, pueden influir en los resultados postoperatorios. Presentamos los resultados a largo plazo de la cirugia de descompresion del nervio mediano en la muneca en pacientes de edad avanzada. Metodos Se trata de un estudio prospectivo historico, a largo plazo, sobre 52 pacientes intervenidos a una edad de 65 anos o superior del sindrome del tunel carpiano. Hemos llevado a cabo una valoracion clinico-funcional (cuestionario de Levine et al.), electromiografica y dinamometrica de los pacientes estudiados, referida a un tiempo postoperatorio medio de 10 anos. Resultados Los valores del cuestionario de Levine revelaron resultados favorables en el postoperatorio, a un seguimiento medio de 10,35 anos, con una mejoria media en la escala clinica del cuestionario de 1,93 puntos (intervalo de confianza [IC] del 95%: 1,72-2,17) y en la escala funcional de 0,83 puntos (IC del 95%: 0,68-0,99). De igual modo, los valores electromiograficos presentaron una mejoria significativa respecto a sus valores preoperatorios (mejoria media de velocidad sensitiva 8,43 m/s, IC del 95%: 8,17-11,63; mejoria media de latencia motora 1,65 ms, IC del 95%: 1,24-2,25). Los datos de fuerza de presion manual no alcanzaron significacion estadistica. Conclusiones En pacientes de edad avanzada, la seccion completa del ligamento transverso del carpo permite mantener diferencias favorables en la mayoria de los parametros estudiados tras 10 anos desde la cirugia, siendo el tratamiento quirurgico una opcion recomendable.

The objective of this study is to describe the characteristics of the patients with hip fracture admitted to the Public Hospitals of Castilla y León during three monthly periods (November 2014, and October and November 2015).The Castilla y León orthogeriatrics work group created a common register to collect data on hip fractures. The study included patients 75 years-old and over hospitalised with hip fractures in the 13 public hospitals in the community during November 2014, and October and November 2015. A multicentre, prospective, and observational study was conducted, in which clinical, functional, and social variables, as well as in-hospital mortality, were collected.The analysis included data from a total of 776 patients with a mean age of 86 (±6) years. The surgical delay was 4±2.8 days, and the mean hospital stay was 10±4.7 days. The anaesthesia risk was ASA 3±0.6. Around two-thirds (66.5%) of the patients had medical complications while in hospital, and 55.5% required a transfusion. In-hospital mortality was 4.6%. The mean pre-surgical stay was related to the overall stay: P.001.Hip fracture registers are an essential tool for evaluating the process and for improving the treatment quality of these patients. This is the first multicentre register of hip fracture in the elderly created in a Spanish region, and could be a good precedent reference for a future national register.

Age is the biggest risk factor for colorectal cancer, with 70% of the cases in patients over 70 years old. For this reason, a review is presented on the surgical treatment and chemotherapy of cancer of colon and rectum in the elderly. A search was performed in PubMed, including words such as elderly, surgery, colorectal cancer, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and oncogeriatrics, and review articles and originals on treatment of colorectal cancer in the elderly were selected. A narrative form was developed from the latest evidence with the results obtained on the treatment of this pathology. Although the treatment of colorectal cancer is standardised, a prior comprehensive geriatric assessment is required in the case of the elderly, before deciding the type of treatment in order to offer these robust elderly-standardised guidelines for the robust elderly and adapt them for use in fragile patients.

espanolLas patologias que producen dolor son frecuentes en el anciano. Como consecuencia, el uso de farmacos es muy prevalente en esta poblacion. Con frecuencia se prescriben farmacos que no tienen suficiente evidencia en ancianos. Los cambios fisiologicos que ocurren con la edad en la distribucion, metabolismo y eliminacion pueden afectar a la farmacoterapia del anciano. Cuando se selecciona un analgesico, se debe tener en cuenta la comorbilidad y la medicacion concomitante. Paracetamol y antiinflamatorios no esteroideos son los analgesicos no opioides mas utilizados. Estos farmacos deben manejarse con cautela, conociendo sus caracteristicas y el riesgo de efectos adversos. EnglishPainful conditions affect older adults. Consequently, there is a high prevalence of medication use among this population. Drugs without a strong evidence base and outside of recommendations are too often prescribed for elderly. Age-related physiological changes in distribution, metabolism, and elimination often alter the effects of pharmacotherapies in older adults. Comorbidities and concomitant medication should be considered when selecting an analgesic and dose regimen. Acetaminophen and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are the most commonly used nonopioid analgesics. Caution should be exercised with these drugs in elderly.

Hip fracture in the elderly often occurs in patients with high co-morbidity. Effective management requires a comprehensive and multidisciplinary approach.To evaluate the effect of a quality improvement intervention in the detection and treatment of complications in elderly patients admitted for hip fracture.A comparative study was conducted between two groups of patients admitted for hip fracture prior to 2010, and after a quality improvement intervention in 2013. The intervention consisted of implementing improved multidisciplinary measures in accordance with recent scientific evidence. The degree of compliance of the implemented measures was quantified.Patients admitted due to hip fracture in 2010 (216 patients) and 2013 (196 patients) were similar in age, sex, Barthel Index, and a reduced Charlson Index, although there were more comorbidities in 2013. After implementation of the protocols, the detection of delirium, malnutrition, anemia, and electrolyte disturbances increased. A larger number of patients in 2013 were precribed intravenous iron (24% more) and osteoporosis treatment (61.3% more). The average stay was reduced by 45.3% and surgical delay by 29.4%, achieving better functional efficiency.The implementation of a clinical pathway in geriatric patients with hip fracture is useful to detect and treat complications at an early stage, and to reduce pre-operative and overall stay, all without a negative clinical or functional impact.

The benefits of the collaboration between orthopaedics and geriatrics in the management and care of elderly patients admitted with hip fracture have been widely demonstrated. A questionnaire was sent to all hospital geriatricians of Castilla y León in order to determine the characteristics this collaboration between orthopaedics and geriatrics in the public hospitals of Castilla y León. They were asked about the type of collaboration with orthopaedics in the care of the elderly patient admitted with hip fracture and details of the treatment of the complications. Most of the hospitals maintain a high level of orthogeriatric collaboration with geriatricians, and the geriatrician attends to most of the medical complications of these patients. The average hospital stay is 10 days, with a surgical delay of 3 days. Management of the most frequent clinical problems in hospitals of Castilla y León are detailed in this article, comparing them with the latest articles and current recommendations from clinical practice guides.

Carpal tunnel release by opening the flexor retinaculum is considered a satisfactory treatment. However, several factors, like ageing, may influence postoperative results. We present the long term outcomes in elderly patients.This is an historical prospective long term study of 52 patients who received surgical treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome when they were 65 or older. We have carried out a clinical-functional (with the Levine questionnaire), electromyographic and dynamometric valuation of the patients studied, up to ten years from the surgery.The results of Levine's questionnaire, revealed favourable data for a mean follow-up of 10.35 years, with a mean improvement in the clinical score of 1.93 points (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.72-2.17) and in the functional score of 0.83 points (95% CI: 0.68-0.99). Similarly, the electromyographic values showed a significant improvement compared to preoperative ones (mean difference of sensory velocity of 8.43m/s, 95% CI: 8.17-11.63; mean difference of motor latency of 1.65ms, 95% CI: 1.24-2.25). The data on grip strength did not reach statistical significance.In elderly patients, complete section of the carpal transverse ligament, allows maintaining favourable differences in most of the parameters studied, ten years after surgery, making the surgical treatment a recommendable option.