Search

High-dose chemotherapy (HD-CHT) and autologous blood stem cell transplantation (ABSCT) represent the standard of care in multiple myeloma (MM) for transplantation-eligible patients. Up to 3 HD-CHT/ABSCT treatments may be administered during the course of disease, including during late-onset relapse. Transplantation centers routinely collect more than 1 peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) graft; however, subsequent HD-CHT/ABSCT treatments are often not performed, for various reasons. Currently, little is known about the actual utilization rate of stored PBSCs. The collection, storage, and disposal of PBSC products was analyzed in a large cohort of patients with MM (n = 1114) over a 12-year period with a minimum follow-up of 6 years. The final dataset analysis was performed in March 2019, which was set as the reference date. Based on institution-specific charges, the costs for PBSC collection, processing, and storage were estimated. The median number of sufficient PBSC transplantations per patient was 3 (range, 0 to 6), which were stored in a median of 3 (range, 1 to 11) cryopreserved bags (overall, n = 3644). A total of 95% of all patients (n = 1059) underwent at least 1 HD-CHT/ABSCT treatment. However, multiple ABSCTs were performed in 51% of the patients (n2/3 ABSCTs = 538), and only 14% of the patients underwent ABSCT 3 times (n3 ABSCTs = 149). Only a small proportion of collected PBSC bags (5%; n = 109) were used after being stored for longer than 5 years. Overall, 23% of the products (n = 830) were discarded, and 16% (n = 566) were kept in storage until the reference date. From a retrospective standpoint, the collected and discarded (definitively not used) or stored (potentially not used) cryostored PBSCs were associated with considerable costs for long-term cryostorage of approximately €1,600,000. We identified considerable discrepancies between the collection/storage and utilization of PBSCs. This is associated with significant efforts and costs on the one hand; on the other hand, disposal may raise legal and ethical questions. Therefore, we implemented comprehensive guidelines for the systematic reevaluation of stored PBSC grafts at our institution.

Although CD19-directed chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells have been successfully used after a preceding allogeneic stem cell transplant (alloHCT) in patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia, little is known about the feasibility and outcome of CAR T cell treatment in patients who have been previously allotransplanted for lymphoma. In a single-center retrospective analysis, course and outcome of all allografted patients treated with CD19 CAR constructs for B cell lymphoma between October 2018 and November 2019 were studied. CAR therapy consisted either of a third-generation CAR (HD-CAR-1) or of commercially manufactured axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel; Gilead, Santa Monica, U.S.). Altogether, 10 CAR T cell dosings using recipient leukapheresis products were performed in 8 patients: 4 patients (2 mantle cell lymphoma, 2 chronic lymphocytic leukemia) received 6 dosings with HD-CAR-1 and 4 patients (all with diffuse large B cell lymphoma) received 4 dosings with axi-cel. Overall, 6 of 8 patients (75%) responded. CAR treatment was well tolerated with grade ≥ 3 cytokine release syndrome and neurotoxicity each being observed after 1 of 10 dosings. A single patient had moderate chronic graft-versus-host disease. Of note, 3 of 4 patients who received axi-cel had ongoing grade ≥ 3 cytopenia 3 months postdosing, whereas prolonged cytopenia was not observed in 9 alloHCT-naive patients who received axi-cel during the same time period. In conclusion, CAR T cell treatment from recipient-derived leukapheresis products after a prior alloHCT appears to be feasible, effective, and safe in patients with B cell lymphoma. Protracted cytopenia after axi-cel treatment is a matter of concern and requires further exploration.

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic and relapsing inflammatory skin disease in which dry and itchy skin may develop into skin lesions. AD has a strong genetic component, as children from parents with AD have a two-fold increased chance of developing the disease. Genetic risk loci and epigenetic modifications reported in AD mainly locate to genes involved in the immune response and epidermal barrier function. However, AD pathogenesis cannot be fully explained by (epi)genetic factors since environmental triggers such as stress, pollution, microbiota, climate, and allergens also play a crucial role. Alterations of the epidermal barrier in AD, observed at all stages of the disease and which precede the development of overt skin inflammation, manifest as: dry skin; epidermal ultrastructural abnormalities, notably anomalies of the lamellar body cargo system; and abnormal epidermal lipid composition, including shorter fatty acid moieties in several lipid classes, such as ceramides and free fatty acids. Thus, a compelling question is whether AD is primarily a lipid disorder evolving into a chronic inflammatory disease due to genetic susceptibility loci in immunogenic genes. In this review, we focus on lipid abnormalities observed in the epidermis and blood of AD patients and evaluate their primary role in eliciting an inflammatory response.

Alterations of the lipid profile of the stratum corneum have an important role in the pathogenesis of atopic dermatitis (AD) because they contribute to epidermal barrier impairment. However, they have not previously been envisioned as a cellular response to altered metabolic requirements in AD epidermis. In this study, we report that the lipid composition in the epidermis of flaky tail, that is, ft/ft mice mimics that of human lesional AD (ADL) epidermis, both showing a shift toward shorter lipid species. The amounts of C24 and C26 free fatty acids and C24 and C26 ceramides—oxidized exclusively in peroxisomes—were reduced in the epidermis of ft/ft mice despite increased lipid synthesis, similar to that seen in human ADL edpidermis. Increased ACOX1 protein and activity in granular keratinocytes of ft/ft epidermis, altered lipid profile in human epidermal equivalents overexpressing ACOX1, and increased ACOX1 immunostaining in skin biopsies from patients with ADL suggest that peroxisomal β-oxidation significantly contributes to lipid signature in ADL epidermis. Moreover, we show that increased anaerobic glycolysis in ft/ft mouse epidermis is essential for keratinocyte proliferation and adenosine triphosphate synthesis but does not contribute to local inflammation. Thus, this work evidenced a metabolic shift toward enhanced peroxisomal β-oxidation and anaerobic glycolysis in ADL epidermis.

Previous work has shown increased expression of genes related to oxidative stress in nonlesional atopic dermatitis (ADNL) skin. Although mitochondria are key regulators of ROS production, their function in AD has never been investigated. Energy metabolism and the oxidative stress response were studied in keratinocytes (KCs) from patients with ADNL or healthy controls. Moreover, ADNL human epidermal equivalents were treated with tigecycline or MitoQ. We found that pyruvate and glucose were used as energy substrates by ADNL KCs. Increased mitochondrial oxidation of (very) long-chain fatty acids, associated with enhanced complexes I and II activities, was observed in ADNL KCs. Metabolomic analysis revealed increased tricarboxylic acid cycle turnover. Increased aerobic metabolism generated oxidative stress in ADNL KCs. ADNL human epidermal equivalents displayed increased mitochondrial function and an enhanced oxidative stress response compared with controls. Treatment of ADNL human epidermal equivalents with tigecycline or MitoQ largely corrected the AD profile, including high p-65 NF-κB, abnormal lamellar bodies, and cellular damage. Furthermore, we found that glycolysis supports but does not supersede mitochondrial metabolism in ADNL KCs. Thus, aerobic metabolism predominates in ADNL but leads to oxidative stress. Therefore, mitochondria could be a reservoir of potential therapeutic targets in atopic dermatitis.

Background Beti-cel ex vivo gene therapy integrates a modified HBB gene into hematopoietic stem cells of patients with TDT, aiming to enable lifelong, stable production of functional adult hemoglobin (Hb). The efficacy and safety of the treatment have been demonstrated in a total of 63 patients treated across 4 clinical trials (HGB-204,-HGB-205, HGB-207, and HGB-212). Here, we present the first patient who received beti-cel outside of the clinical trial setting, a 14-year-old male with a β 0/β + (IVS-1-6) genotype. Methods Following hematopoietic stem cell collection via granulocyte-colony stimulating factor plus plerixafor mobilization and apheresis, CD34+ cells were transduced with the BB305 lentiviral vector encoding HbA T87Q. The patient received hypertransfusion before mobilization and conditioning, maintaining a pre-transfusion Hb level of >11 g/dL. Six days prior to beti-cel infusion, single-agent busulfan myeloablation was initiated (16 single doses at 0.8 mg/kg body weight; 3.2 mg/kg/24 h) with concomitant clonazepam (see Table for treatment timeline). Ursodeoxycholic acid therapy was continued as hepatic veno-occlusive disease (VOD) prophylaxis through inpatient treatment. Results The patient was diagnosed with TDT at the age of 2 years in his home country and has been treated in Germany since the age of 9. Regular transfusion therapy was initiated soon after diagnosis (Table). Aged 9, the patient was started on desferasirox for iron elimination therapy. His annualized red blood cell (RBC) transfusion volume was 174 ml/kg in 2018 and 185 ml/kg in 2019, maintaining his pre-transfusion Hb at or above 9 g/dl. No HLA-related donor was available for allogeneic transplant. At informed consent, the patient was 13 years old and met the eligibility criteria for beti-cel treatment as outlined in the summary of product characteristics (SmPC). The patient was physically fit, with a 90% Lansky score and regular participation in school sports, but reported physical limitations when running extensively. The patient underwent a thorough assessment before admission (Table), which did not reveal any remarkable abnormalities except TDT-related splenomegaly and signs of slight iron overload (liver iron content, 2.0 mg/g dry weight [normal range, 0.17-1.8]). On 11/Feb/2021, the patient was infused with 5.1 × 10 6 CD34+ cells/kg. The patient received 4 RBC and 8 platelet transfusions following infusion until Day 13 and 27, respectively (Table). Neutrophil and platelet engraftment occurred on day 27 post beti-cel infusion. The patient was discharged from inpatient treatment the same day, in excellent general condition, with 90% Lansky score, Hb of 8.2 g/dl, a reticulocyte count of 9.3%, a total white cell count of 1.55/nl, a neutrophil count of 0.75/nl, and a platelet count of 24/nl. At last follow-up (+100 days), the patient felt well and exhibited normal exercise tolerance. He has received neither red blood cell nor platelet transfusions or chelation therapy since discharge. Total Hb was 11.8 g/dl (Table). Granulocytes and lymphocytes had recovered to normal levels. The patient showed continued, albeit slowly improving, thrombocytopenia (platelet count, 31/nl [29/nl at +60 days]), consistent with previous observations after beti-cel therapy. Myeloablation and beti-cel infusion were tolerated well. Adverse events post infusion were febrile neutropenia, elevated C-reactive protein levels, pruritus, gingivitis, mild mucositis, and vertigo, consistent with the SmPC. At +23 and +26 days, the patient experienced transient subjective hearing loss (quickly resolved). No VOD events occurred. Conclusions This is the first real-world patient with TDT treated with beti-cel therapy. The treatment regimen had a tolerability profile consistent with that of mobilization, apheresis, and busulfan myeloablation, matching clinical trial observations. Following treatment, this 14-year-old patient reached a total Hb of 11.8 g/dL at +100 days without requirement of red cell transfusions and continues to exhibit prolonged but slowly improving and asymptomatic thrombocytopenia. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Schmitt: TolerogenixX Ltd: Current Employment; Therakos/Mallinckrodt: Research Funding; Hexal: Other: Travel grant; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Other: Travel grant. Schmitt: Bluebird Bio: Other: Travel grants; Novartis: Other: Travel grants, Research Funding; TolerogenixX: Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company; Apogenix: Research Funding; MSD: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Hexal: Other: Travel grants, Research Funding; Kite Gilead: Other: Travel grants. Kulozik: Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria; BioMedX: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; bluebird bio, Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau.

Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs) are nuclear hormone receptors expressed in the skin. Three PPAR isotypes, α (NRC1C1), β or δ (NRC1C2) and γ (NRC1C3), have been identified.nbsp;After activation through ligand binding, PPARs heterodimerize with the 9-cis-retinoic acid receptor (RXR), another nuclear hormone receptor, to bind to specific PPAR-responsive elements in regulatory regions of target genes mainly involved in organogenesis, cell proliferation, cell differentiation, inflammation and metabolism of lipids or carbohydrates. Endogenous PPAR ligands are fatty acids and fatty acid metabolites. In past years, much emphasis has been given to PPARα and γ in skin diseases. PPARβ/δ is the least studied PPAR family member in the skin despite its key role in several important pathways regulating inflammation, keratinocyte proliferation and differentiation, metabolism and the oxidative stress response. This review focuses on the role of PPARβ/δ in keratinocytes and its involvement in psoriasis and atopic dermatitis. Moreover, the relevance of targeting PPARβ/δ to alleviate skin inflammation is discussed.

In multiple myeloma, local radiation therapy (RT) of osseous lesions before peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) mobilization is assumed to impair the PBSC mobilization and collection. However, the results of previously published studies are inconsistent and do not evaluate detailed metrics of RT and PBSC outcome parameters. In total, 352 patients undergoing PBSC mobilizations and RT in first-line treatment were evaluated. Patients were grouped into RT (n = 283) and no RT (n = 69) before PBSC mobilization. Except for the International Staging System score, both groups were homogeneous regarding the first diagnosis characteristics, first-line treatments, and response parameters. RT metrics (RT yes versus no, volume of irradiated hematopoietic bone marrow [BM], biologically equivalent doses in 2 Gy fractions [EQD2]) were analyzed for the following PBSC outcome parameters: achievement of the PBSC collection goal, CD34+ cell collection yield, duration of the mobilization phase, and number of leukapheresis (LP) sessions to reach the collection goal. No statistically significant differences in the percentage of collection failures to reach at least 3 sufficient PBSC transplants were identified comparing patients with (n = 32 [11%]) and without RT (n = 4 [6%]) before PBSC mobilization (P = .265). However, patients with RT before PBSC mobilization showed a significant prolongation of the PBSC mobilization (median 1 day, P =.026) and required a higher number of LP sessions to reach the collection goal (median 1 LP, P.001) compared with patients who received RT after PBSC mobilization. Moreover, patients with RT before PBSC mobilization reached a significantly lower CD34+ cell collection result (mean 8.94 versus 9.81 × 10

CD19-directed chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell treatment has evolved as standard of care (SOC) for multiply relapsed/refractory (R/R) large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL). However, its potential benefit over allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT) remains unclear. We compared outcomes with both types of cellular immunotherapy (CI) by intention to treat (ITT). Eligble were all patients with R/R LBCL and institutional tumor board decision recommending SOC CAR T-cell treatment between July 2018 and February 2020, or alloHCT between January 2004 and February 2020. Primary end point was overall survival (OS) from indication. Altogether, 41 and 60 patients for whom CAR T cells and alloHCT were intended, respectively, were included. In both cohorts, virtually all patients had active disease at indication. CI was recommended as part of second-line therapy for 21 alloHCT patients but no CAR T-cell patients. Median OS from indication was 475 days with CAR T cells vs 285 days with alloHCT (P = .88) and 222 days for 39 patients for whom alloHCT beyond second line was recommended (P = .08). Of CAR T-cell and alloHCT patients, 73% and 65%, respectively, proceeded to CI. After CI, 12-month estimates for nonrelapse mortality, relapse incidence, progression-free survival, and OS for CAR T cells vs alloHCT were 3% vs 21% (P = .04), 59% vs 44% (P = .12), 39% vs 33% (P = .97), and 68% vs 54% (P = .32), respectively. In conclusion, CAR T-cell outcomes were not inferior to alloHCT outcomes, whether measured by ITT or from CI administration, supporting strategies preferring CAR T cells over alloHCT as first CI for multiply R/R LBCL.

Background: T lymphocyte collection through leukapheresis is an essential step for chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy. Timing of apheresis is challenging in heavily pretreated patients who suffer from rapid progressive disease and receive T cell impairing medication. Methods: A total of 75 unstimulated leukaphereses were analyzed including 45 aphereses in patients and 30 in healthy donors. Thereof, 41 adult patients with Non-Hodgkin&rsquo, s lymphoma (85%) or acute lymphoblastic leukemia (15%) underwent leukapheresis for CAR-T cell production. Results: Sufficient lymphocytes were harvested from all patients even from those with low peripheral lymphocyte counts of 0.18/nL. Only four patients required a second leukapheresis session. Leukapheresis products contained a median of 98 &times, 108 (9 - 341 &times, 108) total nucleated cells (TNC) with 38 &times, 108 (4 - 232 &times, 108) CD3+ T cells. Leukapheresis products from healthy donors as well as from patients in complete remission were characterized by high TNC and CD3+ T lymphocyte counts. CAR-T cell products could be manufactured for all but one patient. Conclusions: Sufficient yield of lymphocytes for CAR-T cell production is feasible also for patients with low peripheral blood counts. Up to 12&ndash, 15 L blood volume should be processed in patients with absolute lymphocyte counts &le, 1.0/nL.

Background High-dose (HD) chemotherapy followed by autologous blood stem-cell transplantation (ASCT) is the standard treatment for multiple myeloma (MM) patients. However, the collection of sufficient peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) grafts can be challenging, and the question arises whether reinfusion of low-dose grafts will lead to a hematopoietic recovery. Methods The hematopoietic recovery of 148 MM patients who underwent HD melphalan chemotherapy and received PBSC transplants with varying CD34+ cells doses (3–4 × 106 [n = 86], 2–2.5 × 106 [n = 53], 6 [n = 9] per kg body weight [bw]) was analyzed in this retrospective single-center study. Results All patients reached hematopoietic reconstitution, even those who received 6 CD34+ cells/kg bw. 62 (42%) patients received granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF). The median duration to leukocyte recovery ≥1.0 × 109/L was 12 days in every group. The median duration to platelet recovery ≥20 × 109/L was 11, 13 and 13 days, respectively. In the multivariate analysis, a low number of reinfused CD34+ cells was associated with prolonged time until leukocyte reconstitution (p = 0.010, HR 0.607) and platelet recovery (p Conclusion In conclusion, reinfusion of low- and even very-low-dose PBSC grafts leads to sufficient hematopoietic reconstitution. No severe adverse events were observed during or after HD chemotherapy and ASCT in the analyzed cohort. While the impact of CD34+ cell dose is marginal, G-CSF significantly accelerates the leukocyte recovery.

Introduction: Recently, we identified a huge discrepancy between the collection practice and the actual utilization of cryopreserved peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCs) for high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) and autologous blood stem cell transplantation (ABSCT). Specifically, patients with Burkitt lymphoma, acute leukemia, and myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) were frequently not referred for ABSCT after successful PBSC collection. Objective: The aim of this study was to identify variables that are associated with the non-utilization of PBSC grafts. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the collection, storage, and disposal of PBSC grafts in Burkitt lymphoma (n = 18), acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL, n = 22), MPN (n = 18), and acute myeloid leukemia (AML, n = 71) patients. Patients who underwent autologous PBSC collection at 2 collection and transplantation centers between 2001 and 2012 were included and followed up until 2016. Results: None of the Burkitt lymphoma patients were referred for ABSCT. Only in 1 (6%) patient, the graft was discarded after the patient’s death. In all other patients (n = 17, 94%), the grafts were stored independently of the patient’s status (death, n = 4, 22%; no follow-up, n = 6, 33%; no indication for ABSCT given, n = 7, 39%). In ALL patients, 4 (18%) patients underwent ABSCT after a median follow-up of 74 (1–182) months. In the remaining patients, PBSC grafts were either discarded (8 patients, 36%) or stored until the reference date (10 patients, 45%). Seven of 18 MPN patients (39%) underwent ABSCT. ABSCT was performed in 24 (34%) AML patients. In 20 (28%) patients who were not referred to ABSCT, an allogeneic transplantation (TPL) was performed. Fifteen (21%) patients received palliative care or deceased, and their grafts were discarded in all but 1 patient. Additional grafts were discarded in 21 (31%) patients and stored in 9 (13%) patients who underwent ABSCT or allogeneic TPL (n = 44). Conclusions: As the role and efficacy of autologous HDCT/ABSCT are not established in the analyzed entities, the indication for PBSC collection should be reanalyzed in regular intervals. Moreover, PBSC grafts from patients who have deceased, have insufficient grafts, or have already undergone an allogeneic TPL should be considered for disposal or (if applicable) for research use, to economize storage costs on a rational basis.

Introduction Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell (CART) therapy has shown to be a new and very promising therapeutical method in patients with relapsed or refractory (r/r) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). The investigator-initiated Heidelberg-CAR-T-cell-trial 1 (HD-CAR-1) evaluates both efficacy and safety of escalating doses of 3 rd-generation CD19-directed CARTs comprising CD28 and 4-1BB as costimulatory molecules in patients with r/r ALL and NHL. Leukapheresis, manufacturing, administration, patient monitoring and follow-up were all conducted in-house at the Heidelberg University Hospital. Methods Treatment was conducted with escalating doses of autologous 3 rd-generation CARTs after lymphodepletion with fludarabine (90 mg/m 2) and cyclophosphamide (1,500 mg/m 2) in patients with r/r acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), or Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL), with subtype including diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), transformed follicular lymphoma (tFL) or mantle cell lymphoma (MCL). Treatment efficacy as well as occurrence of toxicities, such as cytokine release syndrome (CRS), immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS), infections or cytopenia, were evaluated. Following prior results regarding dose-dependent efficacy and excellent toxicity profile with dose levels (DL) I, II and III (10 6, 5×10 6 and 20×10 6 CARTs/m 2), a trial amendment was approved for treatment of patients with higher CART doses (DL IV, V and VI: 5x10 7, 10x10 7 and 20x10 7 CARTs/m 2). Results Overall, screening was performed for 32 patients. Two patients were considered screening failures due to rapidly progressive disease (PD) and uncontrolled hepatitis B infection, respectively; leading to 30 patients enrolled in the study. The HD-CAR-1 product was given to 27 patients (12 patients with ALL, four with CLL, four with MCL, five with DLBCL, and two with FL) in different dose levels (six patients with DL I, six patients with DL II, eight patients with DL III, 5 patients with DL IV, 2 patient with DL V). The CART product was not given to two patients due to PD and lethal septic complication, respectively. Severe CAR-T toxicity was rare, as only two patients developed CRS ≥ III°. Both patients received treatment with tocilizumab, while one was additionally treated with steroids. No ICANS ≥ III° were reported in the study. 54% of patients achieved a complete response (CR) with an overall response rate (ORR) of treated patients of 65%. In a subgroup response analysis, an ORR of 92% (83% CRs) with 50% of all patients achieving MRD-negative CR was seen in ALL patients. In the NHL/CLL cohort, an ORR of 43% and a CR rate of 29% were observed. Figure 1 displays OS and PFS results till the end of study (EOS, day +90). Conclusion Academic CART production was feasible for all enrolled patients. Patients responded clinically to treatment and CARTs displayed a highly favorable safety profile. Overall, HD-CAR-1 accounts for clinical evaluation of 3 rd generation CARTs. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Schubert: Gilead: Consultancy. Schmitt: TolerogenixX Ltd: Current Employment; Hexal: Other: Travel grant; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Other: Travel grant; Therakos/Mallinckrodt: Research Funding. Müller-Tidow: Pfizer: Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bioline: Research Funding. Dreger: Riemser: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; Gilead Sciences: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; AbbVie: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Bluebird Bio: Consultancy; Roche: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Schmitt: MSD: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; TolerogenixX: Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company; Kite Gilead: Other: Travel grants; Bluebird Bio: Other: Travel grants; Novartis: Other: Travel grants, Research Funding; Hexal: Other: Travel grants, Research Funding; Apogenix: Research Funding.

Background: A low platelet count before mobilization has recurrently been identified as risk factor for poor mobilization. Methods: To determine the relevance of this finding for peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) mobilization, including pre-emptive or rescue plerixafor in the case of poor mobilization, we retrospectively analyzed all patients undergoing PBSC collection at our institution between January 2014 and December 2015 (n = 380). Results: In total, 99% of the patients (377/380) successfully collected a minimum of 2 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg body weight sufficient for a single transplant. Rescue or pre-emptive plerixafor was administered to 11% of the patients (42/380). No correlations between the platelet count before mobilization and the number of peripheral blood CD34+ cells or the CD34+ cell collection result were detected in the entire population or the subgroups according to diagnosis (newly diagnosed multiple myeloma, relapsed multiple myeloma, lymphoma, amyloid light-chain amyloidosis, sarcoma, or germ cell tumor). However, patients requiring pre-emptive or rescue plerixafor had a significantly lower platelet count before mobilization (217/nl vs. 245/nl; p = 0.004). Conclusion: With the current state of the art PBSC mobilization strategies, the platelet count before mobilization was not associated with the CD34+ cell collection result but was associated with the need for pre-emptive or rescue application of plerixafor.

BACKGROUND Granulocyte–colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) originators such as filgrastim (Neupogen) and lenograstim (Granocyte) are widely used for peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) mobilization. In recent years, biosimilar agents have been approved for the same indications. The aim of this retrospective study was to compare the mobilization efficiency of the three G-CSF variants originator filgrastim, lenograstim, and the biosimilar Filgrastim Hexal in a homogeneous group of multiple myeloma (MM) patients in first-line therapy. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS Overall mobilization data of 250 patients with MM were included. Of these patients, 74 (30%), 131 (52%), and 45 (18%) were mobilized with originator filgrastim, biosimilar Filgrastim Hexal, or lenograstim, respectively, at a dose of 5 to 10 µg/kg body weight subcutaneously starting from Day 5 after chemomobilization with CAD (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, dexamethasone) until completion of PBSC collection. RESULTS All but one patient reached the collection goal of a minimum of at least 2 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg body weight during a median of one (range, one to three) leukapheresis session. No significant differences in CD34+ mobilization and collection yields between the filgrastim-mobilized (median, 10.5; range, 2.7-40.4), Filgrastim Hexal–mobilized (median, 9.9; range, 0.2-26.0), and lenograstim-mobilized (median, 10.7; range, 3.1-27.9 CD34+ cells × 106/kg body weight) patients were observed. CONCLUSION Concerning the clinically relevant efficiencies of PBSC mobilization and in terms of reaching the individual collection target, this retrospective study did not detect any significant differences between the three G-CSF variants in the analyzed patient cohort.

Peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCs) are widely used for autologous blood stem cell transplantation (ABSCT). These cells must be stored for months or even years, usually at temperatures ≤−140°C, until their use. Although several in vitro studies on CD34+ viability and clonogenic assays of PBSCs after long-term storage have been reported, only a few publications have investigated the influence of long-term storage on in vivo hematopoietic reconstitution. In this study, we retrospectively analyzed hematopoietic recovery after storage of PBSCs via controlled-rate freezing (CRF) and cryostorage in 10% DMSO at ≤−140°C in 105 patients with multiple myeloma who received high-dose melphalan before ABSCT. Three groups of PBSC transplantation (n = 247) were delineated based on the storage period: short-term (≤12 months, n = 143), medium-term (>12 and ≤60 months, n = 75), and long-term storage (>60 months, n = 29). A neutrophil increase of ≥.5 × 109/L in medium-term or long-term PBSC cryopreservation groups was observed at day 14 after ABSCT; this increase was comparable to patients who received briefly stored PBSCs (day 15). No negative effect of PBSC storage duration was observed on leucocyte or neutrophil reconstitution. Platelet reconstitutions of ≥20 × 109/L and 50 × 109/L were observed after median times of 10 to 11 and 13 to 14 days after ABSCT, respectively. No influence of PBSC storage duration on platelet recovery of ≥20 × 109/L and ≥50 × 109/L was observed in the 3 storage groups (P = .07, P = .32). The number of previous ABSCTs also had no significant impact upon hematopoietic reconstitution. In conclusion, these results indicate that long-term cryopreservation of PBSC products at vapor nitrogen temperature after CRF does not have a negative effect on hematopoietic recovery even after prolonged storage.

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is the most common inflammatory skin disease worldwide. It is a chronic, relapsing and pruritic skin disorder which results from epidermal barrier abnormalities and immune dysregulation, both modulated by environmental factors. AD is strongly associated with asthma and allergic rhinitis in the so-called ‘atopic march’. Xenobiotic receptors and their mates are ligand-activated transcription factors expressed in the skin where they control cellular detoxification pathways. Moreover, they regulate the expression of genes in pathways involved in AD in epithelial cells and immune cells. Activation or overexpression of xenobiotic receptors in the skin can be deleterious or beneficial, depending on context, ligand and activation duration. Moreover, their impact on skin might be amplified by crosstalk among xenobiotic receptors and their mates. Because they are activated by a broad range of endogenous molecules, drugs and pollutants owing to their promiscuous ligand affinity, they have recently crystalized the attention of researchers, including in dermatology and especially in the AD field. This review examines the putative roles of these receptors in AD by critically evaluating the conditions under which the proteins and their ligands have been studied. This information should provide new insights into AD pathogenesis and ways to develop new therapeutic interventions.

Especially in the field of autologous transplantation, it has been found necessary to develop methods that ensure long-term storage with maintenance of functionality of the cells to bridge the therapy-related temporal separation of collection and application.Based on the experiences of more than 40 years, some practical considerations, especially regarding the cell concentration, final volume, and possibly other exogenous substances, should be considered when establishing a protocol for the routine cryopreservation of peripheral blood stem cells. In the following chapter, we describe a freezing protocol for cryopreservation of peripheral blood stem cells which was used and optimized over the past 8 years and was applied to the cryopreservation of more than 2000 peripheral stem cell transplants.

Especially in the field of autologous transplantation, it has been found necessary to develop methods that ensure long-term storage with maintenance of functionality of the cells to bridge the therapy-related temporal separation of collection and application.Based on the experiences of more than 40 years, some practical considerations, especially regarding the cell concentration, final volume, and possibly other exogenous substances, should be considered when establishing a protocol for the routine cryopreservation of peripheral blood stem cells. In the following chapter, we describe a freezing protocol for cryopreservation of peripheral blood stem cells which was used and optimized over the past 8 years and was applied to the cryopreservation of more than 2000 peripheral stem cell transplants.

SUMMARYBackground Collection of peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCs) for autologous transplantation is a well-established process. As a new generation of leukapheresis (LP) machines has been launched, measures of benchmarking and quality control need to be defined in order to ensure consistent collection performance. Objectives The goal of this project was to establish and evaluate a benchmarking system for autologous PBSC collection. Methods This retrospective study evaluated PBSC collection data of 198 patients with symptomatic multiple myeloma in first-line therapy who underwent LP in 2013 and 2014 at our institution. Half the patients in 2014 were assigned randomly to undergo LP with the new Terumo BCT Spectra Optia (Terumo BCT, Garching, Germany), while the COBE Spectra (Terumo BCT) was used in all other cases. In 2014, we implemented a previously described formula for predicting daily CD34+ cell collection. As a benchmark, we developed the performance ratio: collected/predicted CD34+ cells. Results There was no significant difference in the number of collected CD34+ cells, the collection efficiency (collected/processed CD34+ cells) and performance ratio between the two collection devices and between LP procedures in 2013 and 2014. Conclusions We present a comprehensive benchmarking tool that is easy to implement, requires minimal expense and allows specific adjustment of LP parameters for optimisation of LP performance. With this approach, we could confirm the equal efficiency of the two compared apheresis systems.

Terumo BCT recently introduced a new system for mononuclear cell (MNC) collection that uses a Spectra Optia apheresis machine equipped with a redesigned disposable kit and software program (version 11.2). It allows for the continuous collection of MNCs, unlike the original Spectra Optia system (version 7.2), which included a chamber for two-step cell separation. The aim of this study was to compare the two apheresis systems in regard to specific performance parameters. A retrospective data analysis of 150 patients who had undergone peripheral blood stem cell collection between March of 2014 and May of 2015 at our institution was performed. For the matched comparison, patients were divided into two groups by diagnosis and by previous forms of therapy received: a homogeneous group of patients with multiple myeloma (MM) that had received first line therapy ("MM" group, n = 88) and a heterogeneous group that included all of the other patients ("other" group, n = 62). No significant differences in CD34+ collection yields between both collection regimens were found (pMM = 0.19, pother = 0.74) in either group. Moreover, similar performance ratios (collected/predicted CD34+ cell number in %) were observed (pMM = 0.89, pother = 0.1). No relevant variations in platelet or hemoglobin loss were found between the two systems. We conclude that the new continuous Spectra Optia MNC system is equally efficient in collecting CD34+ cells and can be used without sacrificing collection efficiency levels when treating a broad variety of autologous patients. J. Clin. Apheresis 32:27-34, 2017. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Many transplantation centers routinely collect 1 or more autologous peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) grafts in patients with hemato-oncologic and autoimmune disorders. However, subsequent high-dose chemotherapy and autologous blood stem cell transplantation (ABSCT) are often not performed, for various reasons. Currently, little is known about the actual utilization rate of stored PBSCs. We retrospectively analyzed the collection, storage, and disposal practices of PBSC products from a large cohort of patients (n = 1020) with hematologic, oncologic, and autoimmune disorders at our institution over a 12-year period. Patients with multiple myeloma were excluded. Based on our institution-specific charges, we estimated the costs for PBSC collection/processing and storage. The median number of sufficient PBSC collections per patient in the whole cohort was 2 (range, 1 to 6). We could demonstrate that only 67% of all patients who had collected sufficient PBSCs for transplantation actually underwent ABSCT, and only a small minority of all patients (4%) underwent multiple ABSCTs. The actual use of the stored PBSC grafts varied among disease entities from >80% to 0%. From a retrospective standpoint, the collected and discarded (definitively not used) or stored (potentially not used) cryostored PBSCs were associated with considerable costs of collection, cryopreservation, and long-term cryostorage. Although keeping open the therapeutic option for future transplantations may be important, there is currently a huge discrepancy between collection/storage practices and actual utilization of the cryopreserved PBSCs, at a considerable cost and strain on patients. Our study provides a rationale for reevaluating the present standards.

For patients with severe and refractory autoimmune diseases, high-dose chemotherapy and autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation has been established as a considerable therapeutic option in recent years. In this retrospective single-center analysis, we assessed the feasibility and efficacy of peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) mobilization and collection in 35 patients with refractory autoimmune disease (AID). The mobilization data of 15 patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc), 11 patients with multiple sclerosis (MS), and 9 patients with other AID were analyzed. Stem cell mobilization with cyclophosphamide chemotherapy 2 × 2 g/m(2) (n = 16) or 1 × 2 g/m(2) (n = 17) and G-CSF followed by PBSC collection was performed between 1999 and 2015. Leukapheresis was performed in 16 inpatients and 19 outpatients. All patients reached their collection goal and no collection failures were observed. The median PBSC collection result was 12.2 (SSc), 8.0 (MS), and 8.2 (other AID) × 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg, respectively. Twenty-five of 35 (71%) patients achieved a sufficient collection with one leukapheresis session, while 6 patients (17%) required two and 4 patients (11%) required three or more leukapheresis sessions. No correlation of the collected PBSC number was observed regarding age, body weight, diagnosis, disease duration, skin sclerosis, or previous cyclophosphamide. Mobilization chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide 2 × 2 g/m(2) and 1 × 2 g/m(2) delivered comparable mobilization results with leukapheresis on day 13 or 14. In summary, we demonstrate that PBSC collection is safe and feasible in patients with AID. Mobilization chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide 1 × 2 g/m(2) and 2 × 2 g/m(2) is equally effective in those patients.

Background aims Human mesenchymal stem or stromal cells (MSCs) represent a potential resource not only for regenerative medicine but also for immunomodulatory cell therapies. The application of different MSC culture protocols has significantly hampered the comparability of experimental and clinical data from different laboratories and has posed a major obstacle for multicenter clinical trials. Manufacturing of cell products for clinical application in the European Community must be conducted in compliance with Good Manufacturing Practice and requires a manufacturing license. In Germany, the Paul-Ehrlich-Institut as the Federal Authority for Vaccines and Biomedicines is critically involved in the approval process. Methods This report summarizes a consensus meeting between researchers, clinicians and regulatory experts on standard quality requirements for MSC production. Results The strategy for quality control testing depends on the product's cell composition, the manufacturing process and the indication and target patient population. Important quality criteria in this sense are, among others, the immunophenotype of the cells, composition of the culture medium and the risk for malignant transformation, as well as aging and the immunosuppressive potential of the manufactured MSCs. Conclusions This position paper intends to provide relevant information to interested parties regarding these criteria to foster the development of scientifically valid and harmonized quality standards and to support approval of MSC-based investigational medicinal products.

The aim of this retrospective study was to assess the safety and efficacy of bone marrow (BM) harvesting of allogeneic donors in an outpatient setting. Data of 226 related and unrelated donors who underwent BM harvest under general anesthesia at our institution from 2002 to 2014 were analyzed. Sixteen patients were a priori planned for admission for social reasons and 210 patients underwent BM harvesting with the intention to perform this procedure on an outpatient basis. To identify factors that predispose for hospital admission, we retrospectively analyzed donor characteristics and collection parameters. Outpatient treatment was performed in 178 of 210 donors (85%), whereas 32 donors (15%) required admission for clinical reasons (mainly clinically relevant anemia and circulatory problems). These individuals were not significantly different in sex distribution, age, donor's body weight, and the proportion of related donors from those who were not admitted. However, we found a significantly higher collection volume per kilogram donor's body weight in inpatients compared with volume for outpatients (16 versus 13 mL/kg body weight, P < .001). Severe adverse events or deaths occurred neither in the inpatient nor in the outpatient setting. Our study demonstrated that BM harvest in an outpatient setting is safe and feasible for the majority of allogeneic donors. A high volume of BM represented a major risk factor for inpatient admission.

Introduction: We evaluated a predictive formula for CD34+ cell yield from HPC collections at 2 institutions using different mobilization and machine parameters on the COBE® Spectra (Spectra) and Spectra Optia® (Optia) devices. Patients and Methods: Heidelberg: Data were reviewed for all 67 pts who collected autologous HPC from 2/13/14 to 7/11/14. A total of 89 collection events (n) were analyzed (50 male, 39 female). Diagnoses were myeloma (n=64) and non-myeloma (n=25). Age was 17–74 years (median 60). Mobilization was chemotherapy + G-CSF (5 µg/kg SC daily; n=82) or G-CSF (10 µg/kg SC daily, minimum 4 days; n=7) + plerixafor (240 µg/kg SC) added to G-CSF 15 h before collection in poor mobilizers (n=9). Pts were randomly assigned to collect on either Spectra (n=26) or Optia (n=63). Anticoagulant citrate dextrose (ACD) was used at an inlet:anti-coagulant ratio of 15:1 with inlet flow rate of 40–100 mL/min. A central venous line (n=6) or peripheral access (n=83) was used to process 3–4 blood volumes. UAMS: Data were reviewed for all 52 pts who collected HPC from 8/13/13 to 7/10/14. A total of 155 collection events were analyzed (90 male, 65 female). Diagnoses were myeloma (n=127) and non-myeloma (n=28). Age was 24–79 years (median 64). Mobilization used chemotherapy + G-CSF (5–8 mg/kg SC twice daily; n=116) or G-CSF (5–8 mg/kg SC twice daily; n=39) + plerixafor (240 µg/kg SC) added to G-CSF 15 h before leukapheresis in poor mobilizers (n=41). All pts had central venous lines. Spectra pts (n=133) had 5–40 L blood processed using 1,000 mL ACD and 5,000 U heparin for anticoagulation at an inlet:anti-coagulant ratio of 31:1, inlet flow rate of 150 mL/min. Collection flow rate was set at 1.5 mL/min and 10 mL ACD was added to the component at processed volumes of 10 L, 20 L and 30 L. Optia pts (n=22) had 7–23 L blood processed using ACD at a ratio of 12:1 for the first chamber, changing to 25:1 during first chamber collection phase, with a maximum inlet flow rate of 125 mL/min. Heparinized citrate was used as with the Spectra, with 3 mL of ACD without heparin added to the product bag before start of collection, and 1 mL of ACD was added for every chamber processed during the procedure after every 10 L, with an aim to keep the concentration in the product bag 10% by volume. Pts were collected randomly on Optia one day and Spectra another and if platelet count was ≥80 K/mL were given 81 mg aspirin at start of collection. Both institutions: continuous CaCl₂ infusion was used to prevent side effects of citrate for both machines, and CD34+ cells were quantified by flow cytometry using the ISHAGE protocol. Prediction of CD34+ cells collected/L blood processed was calculated using the formula: (peripheral blood CD34+ cells/µL) × (estimated collection efficiency of 30%) / body weight (kg) (Rosenbaum et al. Cytotherapy, 2012;14:461–466). Predicted CD34+ counts/kg were plotted on the x-axis against corresponding observed counts (y-axis) for all collections and the scatter plots assessed for linear relationship between predicted and observed. Linear regression analyses were performed and the linear correlation coefficients (r-values) were calculated; slope and intercepts of the regression lines were evaluated. The same analyses were performed on the following subgroups: combined data for both institutions, data for Spectra and Optia separately by institution, and Spectra and Optia data separately but combining institutions. Results: Regression analyses performed on all collection events categorized by institution demonstrated very strong linear correlations between predicted and observed values [r=0.88 (y=1.64x - 0.10) and 0.92 (y=1.14x + 0.88), Heidelberg and UAMS, respectively]. For data combined for both institutions, strong linear correlation persisted [r=0.91 (y=1.17x + 1.31); Figure]. Data categorized by machine used (Spectra vs. Optia) both within institution and combining institutional data showed consistently strong linear correlation (r-values all >0.84). Conclusions: This is the first report confirming inter-institutional reproducibility of this formula for predicting the minimum number of CD34+ cells that may be expected for a given number of liters of blood processed for an HPC collection. We also demonstrate that inter-institutional differences in mobilization regimens and collection parameters do not affect efficacy of the prediction, nor does machine type used (Spectra vs. Optia). Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Wuchter: Sanofi: Honoraria; ETICHO: Consultancy, Honoraria. Hundemer:Celgene: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Genzyme: Research Funding. Goldschmidt:Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Ho:Genzyme: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.