Search

We study the question of whether a sequence d = (d_1,d_2, \ldots, d_n) of positive integers is the degree sequence of some outerplanar (a.k.a. 1-page book embeddable) graph G. If so, G is an outerplanar realization of d and d is an outerplanaric sequence. The case where \sum d \leq 2n - 2 is easy, as d has a realization by a forest (which is trivially an outerplanar graph). In this paper, we consider the family \cD of all sequences d of even sum 2n\leq \sum d \le 4n-6-2\multipl_1, where \multipl_x is the number of x's in d. (The second inequality is a necessary condition for a sequence d with \sum d\geq 2n to be outerplanaric.) We partition \cD into two disjoint subfamilies, \cD=\cD_{NOP}\cup\cD_{2PBE}, such that every sequence in \cD_{NOP} is provably non-outerplanaric, and every sequence in \cD_{2PBE} is given a realizing graph $G$ enjoying a 2-page book embedding (and moreover, one of the pages is also bipartite)., Comment: This paper has published in 35th IWOCA

We study a framework for modeling distributed network systems assisted by a reliable and powerful cloud service. Our framework aims at capturing hybrid systems based on a point to point message passing network of machines, with the additional capability of being able to access the services of a trusted high-performance external entity (the cloud). We focus on one concrete aspect that was not studied before, namely, ways of utilizing the cloud assistance in order to attain increased resilience against Byzantine behavior of machines in the network. Our network is modeled as a congested clique comprising $k$ machines that are completely connected to form a clique and can communicate with each other by passing small messages. In every execution, up to $\beta k$ machines (for suitable values of $\beta \in [0, 1)$) are allowed to be Byzantine, i.e., behave maliciously including colluding with each other, with the remaining $\gamma k$ or more machines being \emph{honest} (for $\gamma=1-\beta$). Additionally, the machines in our congested clique can access data through a trusted cloud via queries. This externality of the data captures many real-world distributed computing scenarios and provides a natural context for exploring Byzantine resilience for essentially all conceivable problems. Moreover, we are no longer bound by the usual limits of $\beta < 1/3$ or even $\beta < 1/2$ that are typically seen in Byzantine Agreement. We focus on a few fundamental problems. We start with the ${\textsf{Download}}$ problem, wherein the cloud stores $n$ bits and these $n$ bits must be downloaded to all of the $k$ machines. In addition to ${\textsf{Download}}$, we also consider the problem of computing the ${\textsf{Disjunction}}$ and ${\textsf{Parity}}$ of the bits in the cloud. We study these problems under several settings comprising various $\beta$ values and adversarial capabilities., Comment: 54 pages

The paper considers the SUPPORTED model of distributed computing introduced by Schmid and Suomela [HotSDN'13], generalizing the LOCAL and CONGEST models. In this framework, multiple instances of the same problem, differing from each other by the subnetwork to which they apply, recur over time, and need to be solved efficiently online. To do that, one may rely on an initial preprocessing phase for computing some useful information. This preprocessing phase makes it possible, in some cases, to overcome locality-based time lower bounds. A first contribution of the current paper is expanding the spectrum of problem types to which the SUPPORTED model applies. In addition to subnetwork-defined recurrent problems, we introduce also recurrent problems of two additional types: (i) instances defined by partial client sets, and (ii) instances defined by partially fixed outputs. Our second contribution is illustrating the versatility of the SUPPORTED framework by examining recurrent variants of three classical graph problems. The first problem is Minimum Client Dominating Set (CDS), a recurrent version of the classical dominating set problem with each recurrent instance requiring us to dominate a partial client set. We provide a constant time approximation scheme for CDS on trees and planar graphs. The second problem is Color Completion (CC), a recurrent version of the coloring problem in which each recurrent instance comes with a partially fixed coloring (of some of the vertices) that must be completed. We study the minimum number of new colors and the minimum total number of colors necessary for completing this task. The third problem we study is a recurrent version of Locally Checkable Labellings (LCL) on paths of length $n$. We show that such problems have complexities that are either $\Theta(1)$ or $\Theta(n)$, extending the results of Foerster et al. [INFOCOM'19]., Comment: 48 pages, 11 figures

In this paper, we study the following problem. Consider a setting where a proposal is offered to the vertices of a given network $G$, and the vertices must conduct a vote and decide whether to accept the proposal or reject it. Each vertex $v$ has its own valuation of the proposal; we say that $v$ is ``happy'' if its valuation is positive (i.e., it expects to gain from adopting the proposal) and ``sad'' if its valuation is negative. However, vertices do not base their vote merely on their own valuation. Rather, a vertex $v$ is a \emph{proponent} of the proposal if the majority of its neighbors are happy with it and an \emph{opponent} in the opposite case. At the end of the vote, the network collectively accepts the proposal whenever the majority of its vertices are proponents. We study this problem for regular graphs with loops. Specifically, we consider the class $\mathcal{G}_{n|d|h}$ of $d$-regular graphs of odd order $n$ with all $n$ loops and $h$ happy vertices. We are interested in establishing necessary and sufficient conditions for the class $\mathcal{G}_{n|d|h}$ to contain a labeled graph accepting the proposal, as well as conditions to contain a graph rejecting the proposal. We also discuss connections to the existing literature, including that on majority domination, and investigate the properties of the obtained conditions., Comment: 28 pages, 8 figures, accepted for publication in Discrete Applied Mathematics

A singularly (near) optimal distributed algorithm is one that is (near) optimal in \emph{two} criteria, namely, its time and message complexities. For \emph{synchronous} CONGEST networks, such algorithms are known for fundamental distributed computing problems such as leader election [Kutten et al., JACM 2015] and Minimum Spanning Tree (MST) construction [Pandurangan et al., STOC 2017, Elkin, PODC 2017]. However, it is open whether a singularly (near) optimal bound can be obtained for the MST construction problem in general \emph{asynchronous} CONGEST networks. We present a randomized distributed MST algorithm that, with high probability, computes an MST in \emph{asynchronous} CONGEST networks and takes $\tilde{O}(D^{1+\epsilon} + \sqrt{n})$ time and $\tilde{O}(m)$ messages, where $n$ is the number of nodes, $m$ the number of edges, $D$ is the diameter of the network, and $\epsilon >0$ is an arbitrarily small constant (both time and message bounds hold with high probability). Our algorithm is message optimal (up to a polylog$(n)$ factor) and almost time optimal (except for a $D^{\epsilon}$ factor). Our result answers an open question raised in Mashregi and King [DISC 2019] by giving the first known asynchronous MST algorithm that has sublinear time (for all $D = O(n^{1-\epsilon})$) and uses $\tilde{O}(m)$ messages. Using a result of Mashregi and King [DISC 2019], this also yields the first asynchronous MST algorithm that is sublinear in both time and messages in the $KT_1$ CONGEST model. A key tool in our algorithm is the construction of a low diameter rooted spanning tree in asynchronous CONGEST that has depth $\tilde{O}(D^{1+\epsilon})$ (for an arbitrarily small constant $\epsilon > 0$) in $\tilde{O}(D^{1+\epsilon})$ time and $\tilde{O}(m)$ messages. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first such construction that is almost singularly optimal in the asynchronous setting., Comment: 27 pages, accepted to DISC 2022

This paper concerns designing distributed algorithms that are {\em singularly optimal}, i.e., algorithms that are {\em simultaneously} time and message {\em optimal}, for the fundamental leader election problem in {\em asynchronous} networks. Kutten et al. (JACM 2015) presented a singularly near optimal randomized leader election algorithm for general {\em synchronous} networks that ran in $O(D)$ time and used $O(m \log n)$ messages (where $D$, $m$, and $n$ are the network's diameter, number of edges and number of nodes, respectively) with high probability.\footnote{Throughout, "with high probability" means "with probability at least $1-1/n^c$, for constant $c$."} Both bounds are near optimal (up to a logarithmic factor), since $\Omega(D)$ and $\Omega(m)$ are the respective lower bounds for time and messages for leader election even for synchronous networks and even for (Monte-Carlo) randomized algorithms. On the other hand, for general asynchronous networks, leader election algorithms are only known that are either time or message optimal, but not both. Kutten et al. (DISC 2020) presented a randomized asynchronous leader election algorithm that is singularly near optimal for \emph{complete networks}, but left open the problem for general networks. This paper shows that singularly near optimal (up to polylogarithmic factors) bounds can be achieved for general {\em asynchronous} networks. We present a randomized singularly near optimal leader election algorithm that runs in $O(D + \log^2n)$ time and $O(m\log^2 n)$ messages with high probability. Our result is the first known distributed leader election algorithm for asynchronous networks that is near optimal with respect to both time and message complexity and improves over a long line of results including the classical results of Gallager et al. (ACM TOPLAS, 1983), Peleg (JPDC, 1989), and Awerbuch (STOC 89)., Comment: 22 pages. Accepted to DISC 2021

We study the {\em Budgeted Dominating Set} (BDS) problem on uncertain graphs, namely, graphs with a probability distribution $p$ associated with the edges, such that an edge $e$ exists in the graph with probability $p(e)$. The input to the problem consists of a vertex-weighted uncertain graph $\G=(V, E, p, \omega)$ and an integer {\em budget} (or {\em solution size}) $k$, and the objective is to compute a vertex set $S$ of size $k$ that maximizes the expected total domination (or total weight) of vertices in the closed neighborhood of $S$. We refer to the problem as the {\em Probabilistic Budgeted Dominating Set}~(PBDS) problem and present the following results. \begin{enumerate} \dnsitem We show that the PBDS problem is NP-complete even when restricted to uncertain {\em trees} of diameter at most four. This is in sharp contrast with the well-known fact that the BDS problem is solvable in polynomial time in trees. We further show that PBDS is \wone-hard for the budget parameter $k$, and under the {\em Exponential time hypothesis} it cannot be solved in $n^{o(k)}$ time. \item We show that if one is willing to settle for $(1-\epsilon)$ approximation, then there exists a PTAS for PBDS on trees. Moreover, for the scenario of uniform edge-probabilities, the problem can be solved optimally in polynomial time. \item We consider the parameterized complexity of the PBDS problem, and show that Uni-PBDS (where all edge probabilities are identical) is \wone-hard for the parameter pathwidth. On the other hand, we show that it is FPT in the combined parameters of the budget $k$ and the treewidth. \item Finally, we extend some of our parameterized results to planar and apex-minor-free graphs. \end{enumerate}

This paper concerns designing distributed algorithms that are singularly optimal, i.e., algorithms that are simultaneously time and message optimal, for the fundamental leader election problem in networks. Our main result is a randomized distributed leader election algorithm for asynchronous complete networks that is essentially (up to a polylogarithmic factor) singularly optimal. Our algorithm uses $O(n)$ messages with high probability and runs in $O(\log^2 n)$ time (with high probability) to elect a unique leader. The $O(n)$ message complexity should be contrasted with the $\Omega(n \log n)$ lower bounds for the deterministic message complexity of leader election algorithms (regardless of time), proven by Korach, Moran, and Zaks (TCS, 1989) for asynchronous algorithms and by Afek and Gafni (SIAM J. Comput., 1991) for synchronous networks. Hence, our result also separates the message complexities of randomized and deterministic leader election. More importantly, our (randomized) time complexity of $O(\log^2 n)$ for obtaining the optimal $O(n)$ message complexity is significantly smaller than the long-standing $\tilde{\Theta}(n)$ time complexity obtained by Afek and Gafni and by Singh (SIAM J. Comput., 1997) for message optimal (deterministic) election in asynchronous networks. In synchronous complete networks, Afek and Gafni showed an essentially singularly optimal deterministic algorithm with $O(\log n)$ time and $O(n \log n)$ messages. Ramanathan et al. (Distrib. Comput. 2007) used randomization to improve the message complexity, and showed a randomized algorithm with $O(n)$ messages and $O(\log n)$ time (with failure probability $O(1 / \log^{\Omega(1)}n)$). Our second result is a tightly singularly optimal randomized algorithm, with $O(1)$ time and $O(n)$ messages, for this setting, whose time bound holds with certainty and message bound holds with high probability., Comment: 24 pages. Full version of paper accepted at DISC 2020

We study graph realization problems from a distributed perspective and we study it in the node capacitated clique (NCC) model of distributed computing, recently introduced for representing peer-to-peer networks. We focus on two central variants, degree-sequence realization and minimum threshold-connectivity realization both of which result in overlay network realizations. Overlay network realizations can be either explicit or implicit. Explicit realizations require both endpoints of any edge in the realized graph to be aware of the edge. In implicit realizations, on the other hand, at least one endpoint of each edge of the realized graph needs to be aware of the edge. The main realization algorithms we present are the following. 1. An $\tilde{O}(\min\{\sqrt{m},\Delta\})$ time algorithm for implicit realization of a degree sequence. Here, $\Delta = \max_v d(v)$ is the maximum degree and $m = (1/2) \sum_v d(v)$ is the number of edges in the final realization. An $\tilde{O}(\Delta)$ time algorithm for an explicit realization of a degree sequence. We first compute an implicit realization and then transform it into an explicit one in $\tilde{O}(\Delta)$ additional rounds. 2. An $\tilde{O}(\Delta)$ time algorithm for the threshold connectivity problem that obtains an explicit solution and an improved $\tilde{O}(1)$ algorithm for implicit realization when all nodes know each other's IDs. These algorithms are 2-approximations w.r.t. the number of edges. We complement our upper bounds with lower bounds to show that the above algorithms are tight up to factors of $\log n$. Additionally, we provide algorithms for realizing trees and an $\tilde{O}(1)$ round algorithm for approximate degree sequence realization., Comment: 22 pages, 4 figures. Short version to appear in IPDPS 2020

We consider the problem of realizable interval-sequences. An interval sequence comprises of $n$ integer intervals $[a_i,b_i]$ such that $0\leq a_i \leq b_i \leq n-1$, and is said to be graphic/realizable if there exists a graph with degree sequence, say, $D=(d_1,\ldots,d_n)$ satisfying the condition $a_i \leq d_i \leq b_i$, for each $i \in [1,n]$. There is a characterisation (also implying an $O(n)$ verifying algorithm) known for realizability of interval-sequences, which is a generalization of the Erdos-Gallai characterisation for graphic sequences. However, given any realizable interval-sequence, there is no known algorithm for computing a corresponding graphic certificate in $o(n^2)$ time. In this paper, we provide an $O(n \log n)$ time algorithm for computing a graphic sequence for any realizable interval sequence. In addition, when the interval sequence is non-realizable, we show how to find a graphic sequence having minimum deviation with respect to the given interval sequence, in the same time. Finally, we consider variants of the problem such as computing the most regular graphic sequence, and computing a minimum extension of a length $p$ non-graphic sequence to a graphic one., Comment: 19 pages, 1 figure

The classical problem of degree sequence realizability asks whether or not a given sequence of $n$ positive integers is equal to the degree sequence of some $n$-vertex undirected simple graph. While the realizability problem of degree sequences has been well studied for different classes of graphs, there has been relatively little work concerning the realizability of other types of information profiles, such as the vertex neighborhood profiles. In this paper, we initiate the study of neighborhood degree profiles. We focus on the natural problem of realizing maximum and minimum neighborhood degrees. More specifically, we ask the following question: Given a sequence $D$ of $n$ non-negative integers $0\leq d_1\leq \cdots \leq d_n$, does there exist a simple graph with vertices $v_1,\ldots, v_n$ such that for every $1\le i \le n$, the maximum (resp. minimum) degree in the neighborhood of $v_i$ is exactly $d_i$? We provide in this work various results for both maximum as well as minimum neighborhood degree for general $n$ vertex graphs. Our results are first of its kind that studies extremal neighborhood degree profiles. For maximum neighborhood degree profiles, we provide a {\em complete realizability criteria}. In comparison, we observe that the minimum neighborhood profiles are not so well-behaved, for these our necessary and sufficient conditions for realizability {\em differ by a factor of at most two}., Comment: 26 pages, 4 figures

The classical Hotelling game is played on a line segment whose points represent uniformly distributed clients. The $n$ players of the game are servers who need to place themselves on the line segment, and once this is done, each client gets served by the player closest to it. The goal of each player is to choose its location so as to maximize the number of clients it attracts. In this paper we study a variant of the Hotelling game where each client $v$ has a tolerance interval, randomly distributed according to some density function $f$, and $v$ gets served by the nearest among the players eligible for it, namely, those that fall within its interval. (If no such player exists, then $v$ abstains.) It turns out that this modification significantly changes the behavior of the game and its states of equilibria. In particular, it may serve to explain why players sometimes prefer to "spread out", rather than to cluster together as dictated by the classical Hotelling game. We consider two variants of the game: symmetric games, where clients have the same tolerance range to their left and right, and asymmetric games, where the left and right ranges of each client are determined independently of each other. We fully characterize the Nash equilibria of the 2-player game. For at least 3 players, we characterize a specific class of strategy profiles, referred to as canonical profiles, and show that these profiles are the only ones that may yield Nash equilibria in our game. Moreover, the canonical profile, if exists, is uniquely defined for every $n$ and $f$. In both the symmetric and asymmetric setting, we give necessary and sufficient conditions for the canonical profile to be a Nash equilibrium, and demonstrate their application for several distributions.

The Hotelling game consists of n servers each choosing a point on the line segment, so as to maximize the amount of clients it attracts. Clients are uniformly distributed along the line, and each client buys from the closest server. In this paper, we study a fault-prone version of the Hotelling game, where the line fails at multiple random locations. Each failure disconnects the line, blocking the passage of clients. We show that the game admits a Nash equilibrium if and only if the rate of faults exceeds a certain threshold, and calculate that threshold approximately. Moreover, when a Nash equilibrium exists we show it is unique and construct it explicitly. Hence, somewhat surprisingly, the potential occurrence of failures has a stabilizing effect on the game (provided there are enough of them). Additionally, we study the social cost of the game (measured in terms of the total transportation cost of the clients), which also seems to benefit in a certain sense from the potential presence of failures.

This paper introduces an extended notion of expansion suitable for radio networks. A graph $G=(V,E)$ is called an $(\alpha_w, \beta_w)$-{wireless expander} if for every subset $S \subseteq V$ s.t. $|S|\leq \alpha_w \cdot |V|$, there exists a subset $S'\subseteq S$ s.t. there are at least $\beta_w \cdot |S|$ vertices in $V\backslash S$ adjacent in $G$ to exactly one vertex in $S'$. The main question we ask is the following: to what extent are ordinary expanders also good {wireless} expanders? We answer this question in a nearly tight manner. On the positive side, we show that any $(\alpha, \beta)$-expander with maximum degree $\Delta$ and $\beta\geq 1/\Delta$ is also a $(\alpha_w, \beta_w)$ wireless expander for $\beta_w = \Omega(\beta / \log (2 \cdot \min\{\Delta / \beta, \Delta \cdot \beta\}))$. Thus the wireless expansion is smaller than the ordinary expansion by at most a factor logarithmic in $\min\{\Delta / \beta, \Delta \cdot \beta\}$, which depends on the graph \emph{average degree} rather than maximum degree; e.g., for low arboricity graphs, the wireless expansion matches the ordinary expansion up to a constant. We complement this positive result by presenting an explicit construction of a "bad" $(\alpha, \beta)$-expander for which the wireless expansion is $\beta_w = O(\beta / \log (2 \cdot \min\{\Delta / \beta, \Delta \cdot \beta\})$. We also analyze the theoretical properties of wireless expanders and their connection to unique neighbor expanders, and demonstrate their applicability: Our results yield improved bounds for the {spokesmen election problem} that was introduced in the seminal paper of Chlamtac and Weinstein (1991) to devise efficient broadcasting for multihop radio networks. Our negative result yields a significantly simpler proof than that from the seminal paper of Kushilevitz and Mansour (1998) for a lower bound on the broadcast time in radio networks.

The $n$-player Hotelling game calls for each player to choose a point on the line segment, so as to maximize the size of his Voronoi cell. This paper studies fault-tolerant versions of the Hotelling game. Two fault models are studied: line faults and player faults. The first model assumes that the environment is prone to failure: with some probability, a disconnection occurs at a random point on the line, splitting it into two separate segments and modifying each player's Voronoi cell accordingly. A complete characterization of the Nash equilibria of this variant is provided for every $n$. Additionally, a one to one correspondence is shown between equilibria of this variant and of the Hotelling game with no faults. The second fault model assumes the players are prone to failure: each player is removed from the game with i.i.d. probability, changing the payoffs of the remaining players accordingly. It is shown that for $n \geq 3$ this variant of the game has no Nash equilibria.

It is known that individuals in social networks tend to exhibit homophily (a.k.a. assortative mixing) in their social ties, which implies that they prefer bonding with others of their own kind. But what are the reasons for this phenomenon? Is it that such relations are more convenient and easier to maintain? Or are there also some more tangible benefits to be gained from this collective behaviour? The current work takes a game-theoretic perspective on this phenomenon, and studies the conditions under which different assortative mixing strategies lead to equilibrium in an evolving social network. We focus on a biased preferential attachment model where the strategy of each group (e.g., political or social minority) determines the level of bias of its members toward other group members and non-members. Our first result is that if the utility function that the group attempts to maximize is the degree centrality of the group, interpreted as the sum of degrees of the group members in the network, then the only strategy achieving Nash equilibrium is a perfect homophily, which implies that cooperation with other groups is harmful to this utility function. A second, and perhaps more surprising, result is that if a reward for inter-group cooperation is added to the utility function (e.g., externally enforced by an authority as a regulation), then there are only two possible equilibria, namely, perfect homophily or perfect heterophily, and it is possible to characterize their feasibility spaces. Interestingly, these results hold regardless of the minority-majority ratio in the population. We believe that these results, as well as the game-theoretic perspective presented herein, may contribute to a better understanding of the forces that shape the groups and communities of our society.

Population control policies are proposed and in some places employed as a means towards curbing population growth. This paper is concerned with a disturbing side-effect of such policies, namely, the potential risk of societal fragmentation due to changes in the distribution of family sizes. This effect is illustrated in some simple settings and demonstrated by simulation. In addition, the dependence of societal fragmentation on family size distribution is analyzed. In particular, it is shown that under the studied model, any population control policy that disallows families of 3 or more children incurs the possible risk of societal fragmentation.

We analyze the domination game, where two players, Dominator and Staller, construct together a dominating set M in a given graph, by alternately selecting vertices into M. Each move must increase the size of the dominated set. The players have opposing goals: Dominator wishes M to be as small as possible, and Staller has the opposite goal. Kinnersley, West and Zamani conjectured that when both players play optimally on an isolate-free forest, there is a guaranteed upper bound for the size of the dominating set that depends only on the size n of the forest. This bound is 3n/5 when the first player is Dominator, and (3n+2)/5 when the first player is Staller. The conjecture was proved for specific families of forests by Kinnersley et al. and later extended by Bujtas. Here we prove it for all isolate-free forests, by supplying an algorithm for Dominator that guarantees the desired bound.

" How well connected is the network? " This is one of the most fundamental questions one would ask when facing the challenge of designing a communication network. Three major notions of connectivity have been considered in the literature, but in the context of traditional (single-layer) networks, they turn out to be equivalent. This paper introduces a model for studying the three notions of connectivity in multi-layer networks. Using this model, it is easy to demonstrate that in multi-layer networks the three notions may differ dramatically. Unfortunately, in contrast to the single-layer case, where the values of the three connectivity notions can be computed efficiently, it has been recently shown in the context of WDM networks (results that can be easily translated to our model) that the values of two of these notions of connectivity are hard to compute or even approximate in multi-layer networks. The current paper shed some positive light into the multi-layer connectivity topic: we show that the value of the third connectivity notion can be computed in polynomial time and develop an approximation for the construction of well connected overlay networks., Comment: Structural Information and Communication Complexity - 19th International Colloquium, 2012, Jun 2012, Reykjavik, Iceland. 2015

This paper introduces the notion of distributed verification without preprocessing. It focuses on the Minimum-weight Spanning Tree (MST) verification problem and establishes tight upper and lower bounds for the time and message complexities of this problem. Specifically, we provide an MST verification algorithm that achieves simultaneously O(m) messages and O($\sqrt$ n+D) time, where m is the number of edges in the given graph G, n is the number of nodes, and D is G's diameter. On the other hand, we show that any MST verification algorithm must send {\Omega}(m) messages and incur {\Omega}($\sqrt$ n + D) time in worst case. Our upper bound result appears to indicate that the verification of an MST may be easier than its construction, since for MST construction, both lower bounds of {\Omega}(m) messages and {\Omega}($\sqrt$ n+D time hold, but at the moment there is no known distributed algorithm that constructs an MST and achieves simultaneously O(m) messages and O($\sqrt$ n + D) time. Specifically, the best known time-optimal algorithm (using O($\sqrt$ n + D) time) requires O(m + n 3/2) messages, and the best known message-optimal algorithm (using O(m) messages) requires O(n) time. On the other hand, our lower bound results indicate that the verification of an MST is not significantly easier than its construction.

This paper initiates the study of fault resilient network structures that mix two orthogonal protection mechanisms: (a) {\em backup}, namely, augmenting the structure with many (redundant) low-cost but fault-prone components, and (b) {\em reinforcement}, namely, acquiring high-cost but fault-resistant components. To study the trade-off between these two mechanisms in a concrete setting, we address the problem of designing a $(b,r)$ {\em fault-tolerant} BFS (or $(b,r)$ FT-BFS for short) structure, namely, a subgraph $H$ of the network $G$ consisting of two types of edges: a set $E' \subseteq E$ of $r(n)$ fault-resistant {\em reinforcement} edges, which are assumed to never fail, and a (larger) set $E(H) \setminus E'$ of $b(n)$ fault-prone {\em backup} edges, such that subsequent to the failure of a single fault-prone backup edge $e \in E \setminus E'$, the surviving part of $H$ still contains an BFS spanning tree for (the surviving part of) $G$, satisfying $dist(s,v,H\setminus \{e\}) \leq dist(s,v,G\setminus \{e\})$ for every $v \in V$ and $e \in E \setminus E'$. We establish the following tradeoff between $b(n)$ and $r(n)$: For every real $\epsilon \in (0,1]$, if $r(n) = {\tilde\Theta}(n^{1-\epsilon})$, then $b(n) = {\tilde\Theta}(n^{1+\epsilon})$ is necessary and sufficient.

The random graph model has recently been extended to a random preferential attachment graph model, in order to enable the study of general asymptotic properties in network types that are better represented by the preferential attachment evolution model than by the ordinary (uniform) evolution lodel. Analogously, this paper extends the random {\em hypergraph} model to a random {\em preferential attachment hypergraph} model. We then analyze the degree distribution of random preferential attachment hypergraphs and show that they possess heavy tail degree distribution properties similar to those of random preferential attachment graphs. However, our results show that the exponent of the degree distribution is sensitive to whether one considers the structure as a hypergraph or as a graph., Comment: 14 pages, 4 figures

Recent evidence shows that in many societies worldwide the relative sizes of the economic and social elites are continuously shrinking. Is this a natural social phenomenon? What are the forces that shape this process? We try to address these questions by studying a Core-Periphery social structure composed of a social elite, namely, a relatively small but well-connected and highly influential group of powerful individuals, and the rest of society, the periphery. Herein, we present a novel axiom-based model for the forces governing the mutual influences between the elite and the periphery. Assuming a simple set of axioms, capturing the elite's dominance, robustness, compactness and density, we are able to draw strong conclusions about the elite-periphery structure. In particular, we show that a balance of powers between elite and periphery and an elite size that is sub-linear in the network size are universal properties of elites in social networks that satisfy our axioms. We note that the latter is in controversy to the common belief that the elite size converges to a linear fraction of society (most recently claimed to be 1%). We accompany these findings with a large scale empirical study on about 100 real-world networks, which supports our results.

This paper addresses the problem of designing a {\em fault-tolerant} $(\alpha, \beta)$ approximate BFS structure (or {\em FT-ABFS structure} for short), namely, a subgraph $H$ of the network $G$ such that subsequent to the failure of some subset $F$ of edges or vertices, the surviving part of $H$ still contains an \emph{approximate} BFS spanning tree for (the surviving part of) $G$, satisfying $dist(s,v,H\setminus F) \leq \alpha \cdot dist(s,v,G\setminus F)+\beta$ for every $v \in V$. We first consider {\em multiplicative} $(\alpha,0)$ FT-ABFS structures resilient to a failure of a single edge and present an algorithm that given an $n$-vertex unweighted undirected graph $G$ and a source $s$ constructs a $(3,0)$ FT-ABFS structure rooted at $s$ with at most $4n$ edges (improving by an $O(\log n)$ factor on the near-tight result of \cite{BS10} for the special case of edge failures). Assuming at most $f$ edge failures, for constant integer $f>1$, we prove that there exists a (poly-time constructible) $(3(f+1), (f+1) \log n)$ FT-ABFS structure with $O(f n)$ edges. We then consider {\em additive} $(1,\beta)$ FT-ABFS structures. In contrast to the linear size of $(\alpha,0)$ FT-ABFS structures, we show that for every $\beta \in [1, O(\log n)]$ there exists an $n$-vertex graph $G$ with a source $s$ for which any $(1,\beta)$ FT-ABFS structure rooted at $s$ has $\Omega(n^{1+\epsilon(\beta)})$ edges, for some function $\epsilon(\beta) \in (0,1)$. In particular, $(1,3)$ FT-ABFS structures admit a lower bound of $\Omega(n^{5/4})$ edges. Our lower bounds are complemented by an upper bound, showing that there exists a poly-time algorithm that for every $n$-vertex unweighted undirected graph $G$ and source $s$ constructs a $(1,4)$ FT-ABFS structure rooted at $s$ with at most $O(n^{4/3})$ edges.

Inspired by social networks and complex systems, we propose a core-periphery network architecture that supports fast computation for many distributed algorithms and is robust and efficient in number of links. Rather than providing a concrete network model, we take an axiom-based design approach. We provide three intuitive (and independent) algorithmic axioms and prove that any network that satisfies all axioms enjoys an efficient algorithm for a range of tasks (e.g., MST, sparse matrix multiplication, etc.). We also show the minimality of our axiom set: for networks that satisfy any subset of the axioms, the same efficiency cannot be guaranteed for any deterministic algorithm.

In this paper we study the reception zones of a wireless network in the SINR model with receivers that employ \emph{interference cancellation} (IC), a technique that allows a receiver to decode interfering signals, and \emph{cancel} them from the received signal in order to decode its intended message. We first derive some important topological properties of the diagram describing the reception zones and their connections to \emph{high-order Voronoi diagrams} and other related geometric objects. We then discuss the computational issues that arise when seeking an efficient description of the zones. Our main fundamental result states that although potentially there are exponentially many possible cancellation orderings (and consequently reception cells), in fact there are much fewer nonempty such cells. We prove a (tight) linear bound on the number of cells and provide a polynomial time algorithm to describe the diagram. Moreover, we introduce a novel measure, referred to as the \emph{Compactness Parameter}, which influences the tightness of our bounds. We then utilize the properties established for reception diagrams to devise a logarithmic time algorithm for answering \emph{point-location} queries for networks with IC.

The celebrated Perron--Frobenius (PF) theorem is stated for irreducible nonnegative square matrices, and provides a simple characterization of their eigenvectors and eigenvalues. The importance of this theorem stems from the fact that eigenvalue problems on such matrices arise in many fields of science and engineering, including dynamical systems theory, economics, statistics and optimization. However, many real-life scenarios give rise to nonsquare matrices. A natural question is whether the PF Theorem (along with its applications) can be generalized to a nonsquare setting. Our paper provides a generalization of the PF Theorem to nonsquare matrices. The extension can be interpreted as representing client-server systems with additional degrees of freedom, where each client may choose between multiple servers that can cooperate in serving it (while potentially interfering with other clients). This formulation is motivated by applications to power control in wireless networks, economics and others, all of which extend known examples for the use of the original PF Theorem. We show that the option of cooperation between servers does not improve the situation, in the sense that in the optimal solution no cooperation is needed, and only one server needs to serve each client. Hence, the additional power of having several potential servers per client translates into \emph{choosing} the best single server and not into \emph{sharing} the load between the servers in some way, as one might have expected. The two main contributions of the paper are (i) a generalized PF Theorem that characterizes the optimal solution for a non-convex nonsquare problem, and (ii) an algorithm for finding the optimal solution in polynomial time.