Search

This review summarizes the clinical development of a family of ultra-rapid-acting recombinant human insulin formulations. These formulations use ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) to chelate zinc and thereby destabilize insulin hexamers. In addition, insulin monomer surface charges are chemically masked with citrate to prevent reaggregation. The first phase 1 trials were performed using BIOD-090, an acidic 25 unit U/ml insulin formulation, which contained disodium-EDTA (NaEDTA). When compared with regular human insulin (RHI) and/or insulin lispro in multiple phase 1 studies, BIOD-090 consistently showed more rapid absorption and/or onset of action. A standard meal challenge study also demonstrated improved postprandial glucose profiles associated with BIOD-090. However, increased patient exposure in larger phase 3 trials showed that this formulation was associated with an increased incidence of local injection site reactions, most commonly pain. A next generation formulation, BIOD-100, contained the same excipients as a standard insulin concentration of 100 U/ml. BIOD-100 maintained an ultra-rapid action profile and was associated with modest but significantly improved toleration when compared with BIOD-090. In order to further improve toleration, the hypothesis that NaEDTA contributed to discomfort by chelating endogenous calcium was tested by either substituting calcium-EDTA for NaEDTA or by adding calcium chloride to the NaEDTA formulation. These calcium formulations essentially eliminated the excess discomfort associated with BIOD-090 but were associated with less optimal pharmacokinetic profiles in humans. Recent efforts have succeeded in developing ultra-rapid-acting human insulin formulations with acceptable injection site toleration by optimizing concentrations of calcium (BIOD-125) and with the use of magnesium sulfate to mitigate discomfort (BIOD-123). Similar formulation technology has also been shown to accelerate absorption of insulin analogs in animal models.

Evaluation of postprandial glycemic excursions in patients with type 1 diabetes with three prandial insulins: VIAject™ (Linjeta™), an ultra-fast insulin (UFI); insulin lispro (LIS); and regular human insulin (RHI).After stabilization of preprandial glycemia, 18 patients received a subcutaneous injection with an individualized insulin dose prior to a meal.Injection of UFI resulted in a more rapid insulin absorption than with either LIS or RHI (time to half-maximal insulin levels: 13.1 ± 5.2 vs 25.4 ± 7.6 and 38.4 ± 19.5 min; p = .001 vs LIS and p.001 vs RHI, LIS vs. RHI p.001). Maximal postprandial glycemia was lower with UFI (0-180 min; 157 ± 30 mg/dl; p = .002 vs RHI) and LIS (170 ± 42 mg/dl; p = .668 vs RHI) than after RHI (191 ± 46 mg/dl; RHI vs LIS p = .008). The difference between maximum and minimum glycemia was smaller with UFI (70 ± 17 mg/dl) than with either RHI (91 ± 33 mg/dl; p = .007 vs UFI) or LIS (89 ± 18 mg/dl; p = .011 vs UFI). Also, the area under the blood glucose profile was lower with UFI than with RHI (0-180 min; 21.8 ± 5.8 vs 28.4 ± 7.6 g·min/dl; p.001).The rapid absorption of UFI results in a reduction of postprandial glycemic excursions.

e20004Background: A variety of tumor markers have been identified to define risk and predict and monitor treatment response in multiple myeloma (MM). Circulating endothelial cells (CECs) and circul...

Background: The variability of the metabolic action of insulin after subcutaneous (sc) injection hampers optimal insulin therapy. Insulin formulations with a reduced tendency to form hexamers might exhibit a reduced variability of absorption from the sc insulin depot into the blood stream. Methods: We investigated the within-subject variability of pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties of an ultra-fast insulin (UFI) formulation and regular human insulin (RHI) in patients with type 1 diabetes. Fourteen patients participated in six 10-hour euglycemic glucose clamp experiments. In this double-blind, crossover study, subjects were randomly assigned to a sequence of two experimental blocks: Each block consisted of three doses of 0.1 IU/kg UFI or RHI, respectively, administered on separate days by abdominal sc injection. Results: Ultra-fast insulin has an earlier onset of action and shorter time to maximal plasma insulin concentration when compared to RHI (tGIRmax 99 ± 36 min vs. 154 ± 74 min, p = 0.002; tCmax 33 ± 16 min vs. 97 ± 39 min, p = 0.00001). The within-subject variability of plasma insulin tCmax ( p = 0.027) and of tGIRmax ( p = 0.022) was less for UFI than for RHI. Conclusions: In patients with type 1 diabetes, this UFI showed reduced within-subject variability when compared with RHI.