1. Testing feasibility of relevant outcome measures in an inpatient setting to demonstrate the value of occupational therapy.
- Author
-
Tse, Tamara, Skorik, Stefani, Fraser, Ruby, Munro, Adrienne, and Darzins, Susan
- Subjects
- *
HEALTH self-care , *EFFECT sizes (Statistics) , *PATIENTS , *PERSONNEL management , *DATA analysis , *T-test (Statistics) , *RESEARCH funding , *FUNCTIONAL assessment , *HOSPITAL care , *PILOT projects , *INTERVIEWING , *OCCUPATIONAL therapists , *HOSPITAL admission & discharge , *DISCHARGE planning , *DESCRIPTIVE statistics , *THEMATIC analysis , *QUALITY of life , *PARTICIPATION , *RESEARCH methodology , *ATTITUDES of medical personnel , *STATISTICS , *HEALTH outcome assessment , *SOCIAL support , *NEEDS assessment , *DATA analysis software , *CONFIDENCE intervals , *OCCUPATIONAL therapy needs assessment , *ACTIVITIES of daily living - Abstract
Introduction: Measures of participation restrictions in daily life occupations are not typically used and may aid discharge planning and demonstrate the impact of occupational therapy services in inpatient settings. The overall aim of this mixed‐methods study was to test the feasibility of relevant outcome measures by (1) investigating which of the three identified measures—the Home Support Needs Assessment, the Personal Care Participation Assessment and Resource Tool, and the Functional Autonomy Measurement System—best identifies meaningful changes in participation restrictions in daily life occupations required for community life; and (2) investigating the acceptability, usefulness, and feasibility of each measure to support inpatient practice. Methods: Occupational therapists (n = 3) completed the three measures with patient participants (n = 12) at admission and discharge. Each occupational therapist participated in a semi‐structured interview. Outcome measure responses were summarised statistically. Qualitative data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis. Findings: Total scores on all three measures changed significantly between admission and discharge (P < 0.002). Three themes reflected the occupational therapist participants' perceptions of the acceptability, usefulness, and feasibility of the outcome measures: 'Clinically and Professionally Meaningful Tools', 'Becoming Familiar', and 'Fostering My Daily Work'. Conclusion: Each measure demonstrated a meaningful change. Selection and successful implementation of an outcome measure depends on its local acceptability to occupational therapists and organisational practices. All three measures are promising tools to address a measurement gap in occupational therapy practice. Future research could embed one measure into practice using knowledge translation methods, with a large‐scale evaluation of the value of occupational therapy. Key Points for Occupational Therapy: Routine use of standardised measures may improve patient outcomes and demonstrate the benefits of occupational therapy.The Functional Autonomy Measurement System (SMAF), Personal Care Participation Assessment and Resource Tool (PC‐PART), and Home Support Needs Assessment (HSNA) are promising tools for inpatient settings, subject to occupational therapists' acceptability.Outcome measures can be integrated within the practice context using knowledge translation principles. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF