1. Impact of overweight on patients undergoing laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: analysis of surgical outcomes in a high-volume center.
- Author
-
Li D, Wang S, Zhang H, Cao Y, and Chu Q
- Subjects
- Humans, Male, Female, Middle Aged, Retrospective Studies, Aged, Treatment Outcome, Feasibility Studies, Hospitals, High-Volume statistics & numerical data, Pancreatic Fistula epidemiology, Pancreatic Fistula etiology, Body Mass Index, Pancreatic Neoplasms surgery, Pancreaticoduodenectomy methods, Laparoscopy methods, Overweight complications, Overweight epidemiology, Postoperative Complications epidemiology, Postoperative Complications etiology, Propensity Score
- Abstract
Background: The feasibility and safety of laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD) in overweight patients is still controversial. This study was designed to analyze the impact of overweight on surgical outcomes in patients undergoing LPD., Methods: Data from patients who underwent LPD between January 2018 and July 2022 were analyzed retrospectively. A 1:1 propensity score-matching (PSM) analysis was performed to minimize bias between groups., Results: A total of 432 patients were enrolled, with a normal weight group (n = 241) and an overweight group (n = 191). After matching, 144 patients were enrolled in each group. The results showed that the incidence of clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (CR-POPF) and delayed gastric emptying (DGE) was significantly higher in the overweight group compared to the normal weight group (P = 0.036). However, there were no significant differences in perioperative mortality (1.4% vs. 2.1%, P = 0.652) and long-term survival outcomes between malignancy patients with different body mass index (BMI) before and after PSM (all P > 0.05)., Conclusions: It is safe and feasible for overweight patients to undergo LPD with mortality and long-term survival outcomes comparable to the normal weight group. High-quality prospective randomized controlled trials are still needed., Competing Interests: Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: This study was approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of Shandong Provincial Hospital (No.2022 − 178). All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Written informed consent was obtained from all patients. Consent for publication: Not applicable. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests., (© 2024. The Author(s).)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF