Search

CBX8 is the core component of the PCG family protein PRC1 complex. It is overexpressed in many solid tumors and plays an important role in the prognosis and biological behaviors of tumors such as occurrence, development, invasion, and metastasis. However, exploration of the role and molecular mechanism of CBX8 in tumors is still in its infancy. Our study found that the down-regulation of CBX8 expression by RNA interference induced differential expression of several microRNAs in human colon cancer cells. The 5 most differentially expressed miRNA precursors (pre-miRNA) (hsa-miR-363-3p, hsa-miR-378a-3p, hsa-miR-371b-3p, hsa-miR-361-3p, and hsa-miR-576-3p) share a common motif sequence: ARAAAKUGCMC. We selected miR-378a-3p and further revealed that the negative regulation of miRNA expression by CBX8 mainly occurs in the processing of pre-miRNA to mature miRNA. CBX8 uses its own RNA-binding domain to interact with pre-miRNA, and is dependent on its own nuclear localization characteristics to limit nucleoplasmic transport of pre-miRNA. Changing the characteristic sequence of pre-miRNA or mutating the RNA-binding domain and nuclear localization signal of CBX8 can effectively weaken the regulation of miR-378a-3p expression by CBX8. However, our experimental results showed that miR-378a-3p inhibited the malignant expression of human colon cancer cells by targeting PDIA4, resulting in increased activity of caspases-3 and -7. In summary, our study suggests that CBX8 acts as an independent RNA-binding protein to regulate miRNA expression. Simultaneously, this study shows the correlation between the CBX8/miR-378a-3p/PDIA4 pathway and the malignant biological properties of colorectal cancer, suggesting this proposed pathway as a possible therapeutic target for human cancers.

Glioma is the most common primary tumor in the central nervous system. However, the development of glioma and effective therapeutic strategies remain elusive. Here, we identify GPR17 as a potential target to treat glioma. Data mining with human LGG and GBM samples reveals that GPR17 is negatively correlated with glioma development. Overexpressing GPR17 inhibits glioma cell proliferation and induces apoptosis by raising ROS levels. GPR17-overexpressing glioma cells are less tumorigenic in the brain than in control cells. Mechanistically, GPR17 inhibits the transcription of RNF2, a key component in the PRC1 complex, through cAMP/PKA/NF-κB signaling, leading to reduced histone H2A monoubiquitination. ChIP-Seq and RNA-Seq analyses reveal KLF9 as a direct target of RNF2. KLF9 mediates the functions of GPR17 and RNF2 in glioma cells. Furthermore, activation of GPR17 by its agonist inhibits glioma formation. Our findings have thus identified GPR17 as a key regulator of glioma development and a potential therapeutic target for gliomas.

The Polycomb group (PcG) protein chromobox 8 (CBX8) is the subunit of Polycomb repressive complex 1 (PRC1) and recognizes the trimethylation of histone H3 on Lysine 27 (H3K27me3), and coordinates with PRC2 complex to function as epigenetic gene silencer. CBX8 plays a key role in cell proliferation, stem cell biology, cell senescence, and cancer development. However, our knowledge of CBX8 post-translational modifications remains elusive. Here, we report that protein kinase D1 (PKD1) interacts and phosphorylates CBX8 at Ser256 and Ser311 in an evolutionarily conserved motif. We found that PKD1 activation triggered by serum stimulation, Nocodazole treatment and oncogene Ras-induced cell senescence (Ras OIS) all promotes CBX8 S256/311 phosphorylation. PKD1-mediated CBX8 S256/311 phosphorylation impairs PRC1 complex integrity by reducing the binding of CBX8 to other PRC1 components BMI1 and RING1B, decreases the monoubiquitination of histone H2AK119, and results in CBX8 dissociation from its target INK4a/ARF locus and the de-repression of p16, and thus ultimately facilitates cellular senescence. CBX8 S256/311 phosphorylation also compromises hepatocellular cancer cells proliferation and migration. Collectively, these results suggest that PKD1-mediated CBX8 S256/311 phosphorylation is a key mechanism governing CBX8 function, including cell senescence and cancer cell proliferation.Financial supportThis work was supported by grants from Ministry of Science and Technology of the People’s Republic of China (2018YFC2000102), and from National Natural Science Foundation of China (31871382 and 81571369).

Platinum resistance is a common occurrence in high-grade serous ovarian cancer and a major cause of ovarian cancer deaths. Platinum agents form DNA cross-links, which activate nucleotide excision repair (NER), Fanconi anemia, and homologous recombination repair (HRR) pathways. Chromatin modifications occur in the vicinity of DNA damage and play an integral role in the DNA damage response (DDR). Chromatin modifiers, including polycomb repressive complex 1 (PRC1) members, and chromatin structure are frequently dysregulated in ovarian cancer and can potentially contribute to platinum resistance. However, the role of chromatin modifiers in the repair of platinum DNA damage in ovarian cancer is not well understood. We demonstrate that the PRC1 complex member RING1A mediates monoubiquitination of lysine 119 of phosphorylated H2AX (γH2AXub1) at sites of platinum DNA damage in ovarian cancer cells. After platinum treatment, our results reveal that NER and HRR both contribute to RING1A localization and γH2AX monoubiquitination. Importantly, replication protein A, involved in both NER and HRR, mediates RING1A localization to sites of damage. Furthermore, RING1A deficiency impairs the activation of the G2–M DNA damage checkpoint, reduces the ability of ovarian cancer cells to repair platinum DNA damage, and increases sensitivity to platinum. Implications: Elucidating the role of RING1A in the DDR to platinum agents will allow for the identification of therapeutic targets to improve the response of ovarian cancer to standard chemotherapy regimens.

Polycomb group proteins are essential regulators of developmental processes across animals. Despite their importance, studies on Polycomb are often restricted to classical model systems and, as such, little is known about the evolution of these important chromatin regulators. Here we focus on Polycomb Repressive Complex 1 (PRC1) and trace the evolution of core components of canonical and non-canonical PRC1 complexes in animals. Previous work suggested that a major expansion in the number of PRC1 complexes occurred in the vertebrate lineage. Here we show that the expansion of the PCGF protein family, an essential step for the establishment of the large diversity of PRC1 complexes found in vertebrates, predates the bilaterian-cnidarian ancestor. This means that the genetic repertoire necessary to form all major vertebrate PRC1 complexes emerged early in animal evolution, over 550 million years ago. We further show thatPCGF5, a gene conserved in cnidarians and vertebrates but lost in all other studied groups, is expressed in the nervous system in the sea anemoneNematostella vectensis, similar to its mammalian counterpart. Together this work provides an evolutionary framework to understand PRC1 complex diversity and evolution and establishesNematostellaas a promising model system in which this can be further explored.

Summary: Mutations and deletions of polycomb repressive complex (PRC) components are increasingly recognized to affect tumor biology in a range of cancers. However, little is known about how genetic alterations of PRC-interacting molecules such as the core binding factor (CBF) complex influence polycomb activity. We report that the acute myeloid leukemia (AML)-associated CBFβ-SMMHC fusion oncoprotein physically interacts with the PRC1 complex and that these factors co-localize across the AML genome in an apparently PRC2-independent manner. Depletion of CBFβ-SMMHC caused substantial increases in genome-wide PRC1 binding and marked changes in the association between PRC1 and the CBF DNA-binding subunit RUNX1. PRC1 was more likely to be associated with actively transcribed genes in CBFβ-SMMHC-expressing cells. CBFβ-SMMHC depletion had heterogeneous effects on gene expression, including significant reductions in transcription of ribosomal loci occupied by PRC1. Our results provide evidence that CBFβ-SMMHC markedly and diversely affects polycomb recruitment and transcriptional regulation across the AML genome. : Cordonnier et al. report a physical and functional interaction between the leukemia-associated fusion protein CBFβ-SMMHC and polycomb repressive complex (PRC) 1. Their findings provide evidence that cancer-associated alterations in molecules that normally interact with epigenetic factors can lead to subversion of transcriptional regulation in malignant cells. Keywords: acute myeloid leukemia, core binding factor, oncogene, polycomb, epigenetic regulation

Summary Polycomb repressive complex 1 (PRC1) plays essential roles in cell-fate determination. Recent studies have found that the composition of mammalian PRC1 is particularly varied and complex; however, little is known about the functional consequences of these variant PRC1 complexes on cell-fate determination. Here, we show that Kdm2b promotes Oct4-induced somatic reprogramming through recruitment of a variant PRC1 complex (PRC1.1) to CpG islands (CGIs). Furthermore, we find that bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) represses Oct4/Kdm2b-induced somatic reprogramming selectively. Mechanistically, BMP-SMAD pathway attenuates PRC1.1 occupation and H2AK119 ubiquitination at genes linked to development, resulting in the expression of mesendodermal factors such as Sox17 and a consequent suppression of somatic reprogramming. These observations reveal that PRC1.1 participates in the establishment of pluripotency and identify BMP4 signaling as a modulator of PRC1.1 function.

Polycomb group proteins (PcG) are transcriptional repressors that control cell identity and development. In mammals, five different CBX proteins associate with the core Polycomb repressive complex 1 (PRC1). In mouse embryonic stem cells (ESCs), CBX6 and CBX7 are the most highly expressed CBX family members. CBX7 has been recently characterized, but little is known regarding the function of CBX6. Here, we show that CBX6 is essential for ESC identity. Its depletion destabilizes the pluripotency network and triggers differentiation. Mechanistically, we find that CBX6 is physically and functionally associated to both canonical PRC1 (cPRC1) and non-canonical PRC1 (ncPRC1) complexes. Notably, in contrast to CBX7, CBX6 is recruited to chromatin independently of H3K27me3. Taken together, our findings reveal that CBX6 is an essential component of ESC biology that contributes to the structural and functional complexity of the PRC1 complex., In mammals, five different CBX proteins can be part of Polycomb repressive complex 1 (PRC1). Here, the authors provide evidence that CBX6 plays an essential role in regulating pluripotency in embryonic stem cells and that CBX6 functions as part of both canonical and non-canonical PRC1 complexes.

Despite much progress in the comprehension of the complex process of somatic cell reprogramming, many questions regarding the molecular mechanism of regulation remain to be answered. At present, the knowledge on the negative regulation of reprogramming process is indeed poor in contrary to the identification of positive regulators. Here we report for the first time that ubiquitin-specific protease 26 negatively regulates somatic cell-reprogramming process by stabilizing chromobox (CBX)-containing proteins CBX4 and CBX6 of polycomb-repressive complex 1 through the removal of K48-linked polyubiquitination. Thus, accumulated CBX4 and CBX6 repress the expression of pluripotency genes, such as Sox2 and Nanog, through PRC1 complexes to ubiquitinate histone H2A at their promoters. In all, our findings have revealed an essential role for ubiquitin-specific protease 26 in cellular reprogramming through polycomb-repressive complex 1., The ubiquitin-proteasome system regulates cellular reprogramming by degradation of key pluripotency factors. Here the authors report that the post-translational regulation of PRC1 components CBX4 and CBX6 by ubiquitination influences reprogramming.

Polycomb steps to inactivate X XX females silence one of their X chromosomes. This involves a process whereby a noncoding RNA known as Xist coats one of the X chromosomes and recruits chromatin silencing factors. The Polycomb complexes PRC1 and PRC2 are also known to be involved in X chromosome inactivation. Almeida et al. elucidate a key role of a specific complex, PCGF3/5-PRC1, in initiating Polycomb recruitment by Xist RNA. They further demonstrate that Polycomb recruitment is critical for Xist-mediated chromosome silencing and female embryogenesis. Science , this issue p. 1081

The compositional complexity of Polycomb Repressive Complex 1 (PRC1) increased dramatically during vertebrate evolution. What is considered the "canonical" PRC1 complex consists of four subunits originally identified as regulators of body segmentation in Drosophila. In mammals, each of these four canonical subunits consists of two to six paralogs that associate in a combinatorial manner to produce over a hundred possible distinct PRC1 complexes with unknown function. Genetic studies have begun to define the phenotypic roles for different PRC1 paralogs; however, relating these phenotypes to unique biochemical and transcriptional function for the different paralogs has been challenging. In this review, we attempt to address how the compositional diversity of canonical PRC1 complexes relates to unique roles for individual PRC1 paralogs in transcriptional regulation. This review focuses primarily on PRC1 complex composition, genome targeting, and biochemical function.

Maintenance of cellular identity is a critical developmental process depending on the proper transmission of epigenetic information over cell generations. H3K27me3, controlled by the Polycomb group (PcG) proteins, represents such an epigenetic mark and is correlated to long-term and heritable gene silencing. However, H3K27me3 is also found at many inducible or cell cycle regulated genes, implicating an involvement in more dynamic processes. The chromodomain of Polycomb (Pc) binds the methyl moiety of H3K27 and anchors the PRC1 complex involved in nucleosome compaction. We adapted an Auxin-based degron system to deplete Pc during Drosophila development. The fast degradation of Pc results in the rapid removal of the H3K27me3 mark by the de-methylase Utx and in consequence in the rapid upregulation of Hox genes. This result shows that the chromodomain actively protects the methyl mark, inhibiting removal by Utx, hence, allowing for a much more dynamic regulation of PcG target genes.

Ring finger protein 1 (RING1) is a RING domain characterized protein belonging to the RING finger family. It is an E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase that mediated monoubiquitination of histone H2A and the core component of PRC1 complex, which is the repressive multiprotein complex of Polycomb group (PcG). Previous studies showed the important tumorigenic role of RING1 via promoting cell proliferation and the crucial function in maintaining transcriptional program stability during development. However, its mechanism for spinal cord injury (SCI) is still unknown. In our research, we established an acute SCI model in adult rats and studied the expression and function profiles of RING1. RING1 protein level detected by western blot peaked at day 3 after trauma and then decreased gradually. Immunohistochemistry showed the increase of RING1 expression displayed in the white matter more obviously than in the gray matter. Furthermore, increased co-expression of RING1 and GFAP confirmed activated astrocytes in injured spinal cord via double immunofluorescence staining. Meanwhile, we also found the co-localization of PCNA, a famous marker of proliferative cells, with RING1 and GFAP, which indicated RING1 might play a role in astrocyte proliferation after SCI. In vitro studies, RING1 protein level in C6 cells increased after LPS challenge and RING1 was required for astrocyte proliferation and activation induced by LPS. In summary, we took a new insight into the function of RING1 in the cellular and molecular mechanism underlying the pathophysiology of SCI.

Meiosis is a unique process that allows the generation of reproductive cells. It remains largely unknown how meiosis is initiated in germ cells and why non-germline cells do not undergo meiosis. We previously demonstrated that knockdown of Max expression, a gene encoding a partner of MYC family proteins, strongly activates expression of germ cell-related genes in ESCs. Here we find that complete ablation of Max expression in ESCs results in profound cytological changes reminiscent of cells undergoing meiotic cell division. Furthermore, our analyses uncovers that Max expression is transiently attenuated in germ cells undergoing meiosis in vivo and its forced reduction induces meiosis-like cytological changes in cultured germline stem cells. Mechanistically, Max depletion alterations are, in part, due to impairment of the function of an atypical PRC1 complex (PRC1.6), in which MAX is one of the components. Our data highlight MAX as a new regulator of meiotic onset., The mechanisms that trigger meiosis in germ cells and halt this process in non-germline cells are unclear. Here, the authors show that knockout of Max in embryonic stem cells results in meiotic onset in a mechanism that involves the PRC1 complex.

Epstein-Barr virus nuclear antigen 3C (EBNA3C) is a well-defined repressor of host gene expression in B cells transformed by Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) that cooperates with various cellular factors. It is established that EBNA3C interacts with the cellular factor RBPJ (RBP-Jκ or CBF1) through two distinct motifs: the TFGC motif, also called the homology domain (HD) motif, and the VWTP motif. In this study, we investigated the role of each motif in EBNA3C transcriptional repression activity by using two novel recombinant viruses with single RBPJ interaction motifs mutated (EBNA3C HDmut and EBNA3C W227S). Infection of primary B cells with either of these recombinant EBVs led to the successful establishment of lymphoblastoid cell lines (LCLs). Gene expression analysis showed that full repression of EBNA3C target genes is not achieved by EBNA3C HDmut compared to that with EBNA3C W227S or the EBNA3C wild type (WT). Focusing on the well-characterized EBNA3C-repressed genes COBLL1, ADAM28, and ADAMDEC1, we investigated the mechanism of EBNA3C-mediated transcriptional repression. Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) analysis indicated that EBNA3C HDmut is still able to recruit Polycomb proteins BMI1 and SUZ12 to COBLL1 as efficiently as EBNA3C WT does, leading to the full deposition of the repressive histone mark H3K27me3. However, we found that the activation-associated chromatin mark H3K4me3 is highly enriched at EBNA3C target genes in LCLs expressing EBNA3C HDmut. We show here that EBNA3C interacts with the histone lysine demethylase KDM2B and that this interaction is important for H3K4me3 removal and for the EBNA3C-mediated repression of COBLL1 and the ADAM28-ADAMDEC1 locus. IMPORTANCE EBV is a virus associated with human cancers and is well known for its ability to transform B lymphocytes into continuously proliferating lymphoblastoid cell lines. EBNA3C is considered an oncoprotein and has been shown to be essential for B cell transformation by EBV. EBNA3C is well characterized as a viral transcription factor, but very little is known about its mechanisms of action. In the present study, we demonstrate that removal of the activating histone mark H3K4me3 and deposition of the repressive mark H3K27me3 by EBNA3C on COBLL1 are achieved by at least two distinct mechanisms. Furthermore, we discovered that EBNA3C interacts with the lysine demethylase KDM2B and that this interaction is important for its transcriptional repressive function. The findings in this study provide new insights into the mechanism used by the oncoprotein EBNA3C to repress cellular target genes.

Polycomb group proteins play essential roles in transcriptional gene repression during both animal and plant development. Polycomb repression complex 1 (PRC1) is one of the key functional modules in polycomb group silencing. It acts as both a reader of H3K27me3 (histone H3 lysine 27 trimethylation) and a writer of H2Aub1 (histone H2A monoubiquitination) in establishing stable repression chromatin state. Intriguingly, a recent study showed that Arabidopsis PRC1 contains the H3K4me3-binding proteins of the ALFIN-like (AL) family, pointing to a chromatin state switch from active to repressive transcription of embryonic genes required for vegetative plant development. However, molecular and structural basis of AL–PRC1 complexes are lacking, which harmed insightful mechanistic understanding of AL–PRC1 complex function. In the present study, we report the crystal structures of the PAL domain (DUF3594 domain) of AL2 and AL7 proteins as well as their mechanistic binding to the PRC1 ring-finger proteins (RING1 and BMI1). We found that the PAL domain exists as a homodimer and represents a novel protein fold. We further determined the crystal structures of the PAL domain of AL2 (AL2-PAL) in complex with AtRING1a and AtBMI1b, the two core components of Arabidopsis PRC1. Interestingly, two PAL-binding sites were found on AtRING1a. Each of them can bind AL but with different affinities and distinct structural bases. Based on our results, we propose a mechanistic model to understand how AL proteins target PRC1 to active chromatin to undergo the transition from H3K4me3 to H2Aub1/H3K27me3 in establishing gene silencing.

UbE2E1/UbcH6 is an E2 ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme that is regulated by USP7. We identified UbE2E1 as a novel component of Polycomb repressive complex 1 (PRC1), the E3 ligase complex responsible for histone H2A ubiquitination and gene silencing. We demonstrate that UbE2E1 is critical for the monoubiquitination of H2A at residue Lys-119 (uH2AK119) through its association with the PRC1 complex. UbE2E1 interacts with PRC1 subunits including Ring1A and Ring1B. Overexpression of UbE2E1 results in increased levels of uH2AK119, whereas overexpression of catalytically inactive UbE2E1_C131A or UbE2E1 knockdown results in decreased levels of uH2AK119. The down-regulation of H2A ubiquitination by loss of function of UbE2E1 is correlated with alleviated p16INK4a promoter repression and induced growth inhibition in HCT116 cells. These results are specific to UbE2E1 as knockdown of UbE2D E2s does not show any effect on uH2AK119. We extended the UbE2E1 regulation of uH2AK119 to USP7 and showed that USP7 is also a key regulator for monoubiquitination at H2A Lys-119 as both knockdown and deletion of USP7 results in decreased levels of uH2AK119. This study reveals that UbE2E1 is an in vivo E2 for the PRC1 ligase complex and thus plays an important role in the regulation of H2A Lys-119 monoubiquitination.

Polycomb group (PcG) proteins are epigenetic repressors that are essential for cell differentiation and development. The Pc protein is a key member of the PcG family and a core component of the Polycomb repressive complex PRC1. In Drosophila, the chromodomain of Pc specifically recognizes the gene silencing mark trimethylated lysine 27 of histone H3 generated by the PRC2 complex, thus delivering the PRC1 complex to targeted chromatin sites. The mammalian Pc homologs, however, bind differentially to methylated histone H3. In addition, other mechanisms may also contribute to the chromatin targeting of Pc and its associated complexes. Here we summarize the current knowledge of the Pc chromodomain and discuss its role as a histone methylation reader from a structural point of view. The cross talk between lysine methylation and other posttranslational modifications on histones and other putative nonhistone targets of Pc protein is also discussed. Recent advancement in the chemical probe development against the chromodomain is also reviewed.

Cbx2 is immobilized at mitotic chromosomes, and the immobilization is independent of PRC1 or PRC2. Cbx2 plays important roles in recruiting PRC1 complex to mitotic chromosomes. This study provides novel insights into the PcG epigenetic memory passing down through cell divisions., Polycomb group (PcG) proteins are epigenetic transcriptional factors that repress key developmental regulators and maintain cellular identity through mitosis via a poorly understood mechanism. Using quantitative live-cell imaging in mouse ES cells and tumor cells, we demonstrate that, although Polycomb repressive complex (PRC) 1 proteins (Cbx-family proteins, Ring1b, Mel18, and Phc1) exhibit variable capacities of association with mitotic chromosomes, Cbx2 overwhelmingly binds to mitotic chromosomes. The recruitment of Cbx2 to mitotic chromosomes is independent of PRC1 or PRC2, and Cbx2 is needed to recruit PRC1 complex to mitotic chromosomes. Quantitative fluorescence recovery after photobleaching analysis indicates that PRC1 proteins rapidly exchange at interphasic chromatin. On entry into mitosis, Cbx2, Ring1b, Mel18, and Phc1 proteins become immobilized at mitotic chromosomes, whereas other Cbx-family proteins dynamically bind to mitotic chromosomes. Depletion of PRC1 or PRC2 protein has no effect on the immobilization of Cbx2 on mitotic chromosomes. We find that the N-terminus of Cbx2 is needed for its recruitment to mitotic chromosomes, whereas the C-terminus is required for its immobilization. Thus these results provide fundamental insights into the molecular mechanisms of epigenetic inheritance.

Polycomb group proteins (PcGs) are essential epigenetic regulators that play key roles in development, pluripotency, senescence, and cancer. Recent reports have found that the composition of mammalian Polycomb repressive complex 1 (PRC1) is far more varied than previously thought. PRC1 diversity largely depends on the presence of CBX proteins, dividing them into canonical and non-canonical, the existence of redundant subunits, and different binding affinities and/or regulation. However, there is no clear insight into how many functional PRC1 complexes exist and what the biological relevance is for such diversification. In this review we focus on mammalian PRC1 and discuss the mechanisms by which canonical and non-canonical PRC1 are recruited to chromatin, their role in normal development and disease, and emerging evidence for PRC1 as a transcriptional activator.

Polycomb Group (PcG) proteins are crucial for epigenetic inheritance of cell identity and are functionally conserved from Drosophila to humans. PcG proteins regulate expression of homeotic genes and are essential for axial body patterning during development. Earlier we showed that transcription factor YY1 functions as a PcG protein. YY1 also physically interacts with YAF2, a homolog of RYBP. Here we characterize the mechanism and physiologic relevance of this interaction. We found phenotypic and biochemical correction of dRYBP mutant flies by mouse YAF2 demonstrating functional conservation across species. Further biochemical analysis revealed that YAF2 bridges interaction between YY1 and the PRC1 complex. ChIP assays in HeLa cells showed that YAF2 is responsible for PcG recruitment to DNA, which is mediated by YY1 DNA binding. Knock-down of YY1 abrogated PcG recruitment, which was not compensated by exogenous YAF2 demonstrating that YY1 DNA binding is a priori necessary for Polycomb assembly on chromatin. Finally, we found that although YAF2 and RYBP regulate a similar number of Polycomb target genes, there are very few genes that are regulated by both implying functional distinction between the two proteins. We present a model of YAF2-dependent and independent PcG DNA recruitment by YY1.

Polycomb repressive complex 1 (PRC1) catalyzes lysine 119 monoubiquitylation on H2A (H2AK119ub1) and regulates pluripotency in embryonic stem cells (ESCs). However, the mechanisms controlling the binding of PRC1 to genomic sites and its catalytic activity are poorly understood. Here, we show that Fbxl10 interacts with Ring1B and Nspc1, forming a noncanonical PRC1 that is required for H2AK119ub1 in mouse ESCs. Genome-wide analyses reveal that Fbxl10 preferentially binds to CpG islands and colocalizes with Ring1B on Polycomb target genes. Notably, Fbxl10 depletion causes a decrease in Ring1B binding to target genes and a major loss of H2AK119ub1. Furthermore, genetic analyses demonstrate that Fbxl10 DNA binding capability and integration into PRC1 are required for H2AK119 ubiquitylation. ESCs lacking Fbxl10, like previously characterized Polycomb mutants, cannot differentiate properly. These results demonstrate that Fbxl10 has a key role in regulating Ring1B recruitment to its target genes and H2AK119 ubiquitylation in ESCs.

The Polycomb repressive complex 1 (PRC1) is required for decisions of stem cell fate. In mouse embryonic stem cells (ESCs), two major variations of PRC1 complex, defined by the mutually exclusive presence of Cbx7 or RYBP, have been identified. Here, we show that although the genomic localization of the Cbx7- and RYBP-containing PRC1 complexes overlaps in certain genes, it can also be mutually exclusive. At the molecular level, Cbx7 is necessary for recruitment of Ring1B to chromatin, whereas RYBP enhances the PRC1 enzymatic activity. Genes occupied by RYBP show lower levels of Ring1B and H2AK119ub and are consequently more highly transcribed than those bound by Cbx7. At the functional level, we show that genes occupied by RYBP are primarily involved in the regulation of metabolism and cell-cycle progression, whereas those bound by Cbx7 predominantly control early-lineage commitment of ESCs. Altogether, our results indicate that different PRC1 subtypes establish a complex pattern of gene regulation that regulates common and nonoverlapping aspects of ESC pluripotency and differentiation. This work was supported by grants from the Spanish "Ministerio de/nEducación y Ciencia" (BFU2010-18692), from AGAUR, and from by European Commission's 7th Framework Program 4DCellFate grant number 277899 to L.D.C.; L.M. was supported by a postdoctoral CRG-Novartis fellowship

The Polycomb group (PcG) proteins have an important role in controlling the expression of key genes implicated in embryonic development, differentiation, and decision of cell fates. Emerging evidence suggests that Polycomb repressive complexes 1 (PRC1) is defined by the six Polycomb group RING finger protein (Pcgf) paralogs, and Pcgf proteins can assemble into noncanonical PRC1 complexes. However, little is known about the precise mechanisms of differently composed noncanonical PRC1 in the maintenance of the pluripotent cell state. Here we disrupt the Pcgf genes in mouse embryonic stem cells by CRISPR-Cas9 and find Pcgf6 null embryonic stem cells display severe defects in self-renewal and differentiation. Furthermore, Pcgf6 regulates genes mostly involved in differentiation and spermatogenesis by assembling a noncanonical PRC1 complex PRC1.6. Notably, Pcgf6 deletion causes a dramatic decrease in PRC1.6 binding to target genes and no loss of H2AK119ub1. Thus, Pcgf6 is essential for recruitment of PRC1.6 to chromatin. Our results reveal a previously uncharacterized, H2AK119ub1-independent chromatin assembly associated with PRC1.6 complex.

SummaryPolycomb group proteins are essential regulators of cell fate decisions during embryogenesis. In mammals, at least five different Cbx proteins (Cbx2, Cbx4, Cbx6, Cbx7, and Cbx8) are known to associate with the core Polycomb repressive complex 1 (PRC1). Here we show that pluripotency and differentiation of mouse embryonic stem cells (ESCs) is regulated by different Cbx-associated PRC1 complexes with unique functions. Maintenance of pluripotency primarily depends on Cbx7, while lineage commitment is orchestrated by Cbx2 and Cbx4. At the molecular level, we have uncovered a Polycomb autoregulatory loop in which Cbx7 represses the expression of prodifferentiation Cbx proteins, thereby maintaining the pluripotent state. We additionally show that the occupancy of Cbx7 on promoters is completely dependent on PRC2 activity but only partially dependent on a functional PRC1 complex. Thus, Cbx proteins confer distinct target selectivity to the PRC1 complex, achieving a balance between the self-renewal and the differentiation of ESCs.

Introduction: PcG proteins form two main multiprotein complexes, Polycomb repressive complex 1 (PRC1) and PRC2. They repress the transcription of target genes. Polycomb group ring finger protein1 (PCGF1) is a component of PRC1.1, a non-canonical PRC1.1 that monoubiquitylates H2A at lysine 119 in a manner independent of H3K27me3. Several groups including ours showed that the loss of Ezh2, a component of PRC2, promotes the development of JAK2 V617F-induced Myelofibrosis (MF) in mice. However, the role of PRC1.1 in hematologic malignancies is still not fully understood. We found that the deletion of PCGF1 in mice promotes myeloid commitment of hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPCs), and eventually induces a lethal myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN)-like disease in mice (Nakajima-Takagi Y, unpublished data). Based on these findings, we investigated the role of PCGF1 in a mouse model of JAK2V617F-induced myelofibrosis. Methods: We transplanted BM cells from Cre-ERT2, PCGF1flox/flox;Cre-ERT2, JAK2V617F;Cre-ERT2, and JAK2V617F;PCGF1flox/flox;Cre-ERT2 mice into lethally irradiated recipient mice. We deleted PCGF1 by tamoxifen administration 4 weeks after transplantation. Results: JAK2/PCGF1 KO mice developed lethal MF significantly earlier than the other genotypes (p Conclusions: Our findings suggest that dysregulated PRC1.1 function promotes JAK2V617F-induced MF with mechanisms distinct from MF associated with PRC2 dysfunction. Disclosures Harada: Celgene: Research Funding.

The Su(z)2 complex contains Posterior sex combs (Psc) and Suppressor 2 of zeste [Su(z)2], two paralogous genes that likely arose by gene duplication. Psc encodes a Polycomb group protein that functions as a central component of the PRC1 complex, which maintains transcriptional repression of a wide array of genes. Although much is known about Psc, very little is known about Su(z)2, the analysis of which has been hampered by a dearth of alleles. We have generated new alleles of Su(z)2 and analyzed them at the genetic and molecular levels. Some of these alleles display negative complementation in that they cause lethality when heterozygous with the gain-of-function Su(z)21 allele but are hemizygous and, in some cases, homozygous viable. Interestingly, alleles of this class identify protein domains within Su(z)2 that are highly conserved in Psc and the mammalian Bmi-1 and Mel-18 proteins. We also find several domains of intrinsic disorder in the C-terminal regions of both Psc and Su(z)2 and suggest that these domains may contribute to the essential functions of both proteins.

PCGF1 encodes one of six human Polycomb RING finger homologs that are linked to transcriptional repression and developmental gene regulation. Individual PCGF proteins define discrete Polycomb Repressor Complex 1 (PRC1) multi-protein complexes with diverse subunit composition whose functions are incompletely understood. PCGF1 is a component of a variant PRC1 complex that also contains the BCL6 co-repressor BCOR and the histone demethylase KDM2B. To further investigate the role of PCGF1, we mapped the physical interactions of the protein under endogenous conditions in a cell model of neuronal differentiation. Using stringent statistical cut-offs, 83 highly enriched interacting proteins were identified, including all previously reported members of the variant PRC1 complex containing PCGF1, as well as proteins linked to diverse cellular pathways such as chromatin and cell cycle regulation. Notably, a sub-network of proteins associated with the establishment and maintenance of pluripotency (NANOG, OCT4, PATZ1 and the developmental regulator DPPA4) were found to independently interact with PCGF1 in a subsequent round of physical interaction mapping experiments. Furthermore, knockdown of PCGF1 results in reduced expression of DPPA4 and other subunits of the variant PRC1 complex at both mRNA and protein levels. Thus, PCGF1 represents a physical and functional link between Polycomb function and pluripotency.

Histone acetyltransferase (HAT) complexes have been linked to activation of transcription. Reptin is a subunit of different chromatin-remodeling complexes, including the TIP60 HAT complex. In Drosophila, Reptin also copurifies with the Polycomb group (PcG) complex PRC1, which maintains genes in a transcriptionally silent state. We demonstrate genetic interactions between reptin mutant flies and PcG mutants, resulting in misexpression of the homeotic gene Scr. Genetic interactions are not restricted to PRC1 components, but are also observed with another PcG gene. In reptin homozygous mutant cells, a Polycomb response-element-linked reporter gene is derepressed, whereas endogenous homeotic gene expression is not. Furthermore, reptin mutants suppress position-effect variegation (PEV), a phenomenon resulting from spreading of heterochromatin. These features are shared with three other components of TIP60 complexes, namely Enhancer of Polycomb, Domino, and dMRG15. We conclude that Drosophila Reptin participates in epigenetic processes leading to a repressive chromatin state as part of the fly TIP60 HAT complex rather than through the PRC1 complex. This shows that the TIP60 complex can promote the generation of silent chromatin.

Polycomb group (PcG) proteins Bmi-1 and Ring1B are core subunits of the PRC1 complex which plays important roles in the regulation of Hox gene expression, X-chromosome inactivation, tumorigenesis and stem cell self-renewal. The RING finger protein Ring1B is an E3 ligase that participates in the ubiquitination of lysine 119 of histone H2A, and the binding of Bmi-1 stimulates the E3 ligase activity. We have mapped the regions of Bmi-1 and Ring1B required for efficient ubiquitin transfer and determined a 2.5 Angstroms structure of the Bmi-1-Ring1B core domain complex. The structure reveals that Ring1B 'hugs' Bmi-1 through extensive RING domain contacts and its N-terminal tail wraps around Bmi-1. The two regions of interaction have a synergistic effect on the E3 ligase activity. Our analyses suggest a model where the Bmi-1-Ring1B complex stabilizes the interaction between the E2 enzyme and the nucleosomal substrate to allow efficient ubiquitin transfer.

Polycomb group proteins preserve body patterning through development by maintaining transcriptional silencing of homeotic genes. A long-standing hypothesis is that silencing involves creating chromatin structure that is repressive to gene transcription. We demonstrate by electron microscopy that core components of Polycomb Repressive Complex 1 induce compaction of defined nucleosomal arrays. Compaction by Polycomb proteins requires nucleosomes but not histone tails. Each Polycomb complex can compact about three nucleosomes. A region of Posterior Sex Combs that is important for gene silencing in vivo is also important for chromatin compaction, linking the two activities. This mechanism of chromatin compaction might be central to stable gene silencing by the Polycomb group.

Polycomb group (PcG) proteins are important for maintaining the silenced state of homeotic genes. Biochemical and genetic studies in Drosophila and mammalian cells indicate that PcG proteins function in at least two distinct protein complexes: the ESC-E(Z) or EED-EZH2 complex, and the PRC1 complex. Recent work has shown that at least part of the silencing function of the ESC-E(Z) complex is mediated by its intrinsic activity for methylating histone H3 on lysine 27. In addition to being involved in Hox gene silencing, the complex and its associated histone methyltransferase activity are important in other biological processes including X-inactivation, germline development, stem cell pluripotency and cancer metastasis.

The Polycomb Group proteins are required for stable long-term maintenance of transcriptionally repressed states. Two distinct Polycomb Group complexes have been identified, a 2-MDa PRC1 complex and a 600-kDa complex containing the ESC and E(Z) proteins together with the histone deacetylase RPD3 and the histone-binding protein p55. We report here that there are at least two embryonic ESC/E(Z) complexes that undergo dynamic changes during development and a third larval E(Z) complex that forms after disappearance of ESC. We have identified a larger embryonic ESC complex containing RPD3 and p55, along with E(Z), that is present only until mid-embryogenesis, while the previously identified 600-kDa ESC/E(Z) complex persists until the end of embryogenesis. Constitutive overexpression of ESC does not promote abnormal persistence of the larger or smaller embryonic complexes and does not delay a dissociation of E(Z) from the smaller ESC complex or delay appearance of the larval E(Z) complex, indicating that these changes are developmentally programmed and not regulated by the temporal profile of ESC itself. Genetic removal of ESC prevents appearance of E(Z) in the smaller embryonic complex, but does not appear to affect formation of the large embryonic ESC complex or the PRC1 complex. We also show that the ESC complex is already bound to chromosomes in preblastoderm embryos and present genetic evidence that ESC is required during this very early period.

Polycomb group (PcG) proteins maintain transcriptional repression during development, likely by creating repressive chromatin states. The Extra Sex Combs (ESC) and Enhancer of Zeste [E(Z)] proteins are partners in an essential PcG complex, but its full composition and biochemical activities are not known. A SET domain in E(Z) suggests this complex might methylate histones. We purified an ESC-E(Z) complex from Drosophila embryos and found four major subunits: ESC, E(Z), NURF-55, and the PcG repressor, SU(Z)12. A recombinant complex reconstituted from these four subunits methylates lysine-27 of histone H3. Mutations in the E(Z) SET domain disrupt methyltransferase activity in vitro and HOX gene repression in vivo. These results identify E(Z) as a PcG protein with enzymatic activity and implicate histone methylation in PcG-mediated silencing.

Enhancer of Zeste is a Polycomb Group protein essential for the establishment and maintenance of repression of homeotic and other genes. In the early embryo it is found in a complex that includes ESC and is recruited to Polycomb Response Elements. We show that this complex contains a methyltransferase activity that methylates lysine 9 and lysine 27 of histone H3, but the activity is lost when the E(Z) SET domain is mutated. The lysine 9 position is trimethylated and this mark is closely associated with Polycomb binding sites on polytene chromosomes but is also found in centric heterochromatin, chromosome 4, and telomeric sites. Histone H3 methylated in vitro by the E(Z)/ESC complex binds specifically to Polycomb protein.

Polycomb repressive complex 1 (PRC1) plays an essential role in the epigenetic repression of gene expression during development and cellular differentiation via multiple effector mechanisms, including ubiquitination of H2A and chromatin compaction. However, whether it regulates the stepwise progression of adipogenesis is unknown. Here, we show that FBXL10/KDM2B is an anti-adipogenic factor that is up-regulated during the early phase of 3T3-L1 preadipocyte differentiation and in adipose tissue in a diet-induced model of obesity. Interestingly, inhibition of adipogenesis does not require the JmjC demethylase domain of FBXL10, but it does require the F-box and leucine-rich repeat domains, which we show recruit a noncanonical polycomb repressive complex 1 (PRC1) containing RING1B, SKP1, PCGF1, and BCOR. Knockdown of either RING1B or SKP1 prevented FBXL10-mediated repression of 3T3-L1 preadipocyte differentiation indicating that PRC1 formation mediates the inhibitory effect of FBXL10 on adipogenesis. Using ChIP-seq, we show that FBXL10 recruits RING1B to key specific genomic loci surrounding the key cell cycle and the adipogenic genes Cdk1, Uhrf1, Pparg1, and Pparg2 to repress adipogenesis. These results suggest that FBXL10 represses adipogenesis by targeting a noncanonical PRC1 complex to repress key genes (e.g. Pparg) that control conversion of pluripotent cells into the adipogenic lineage.

Polycomb complexes are found in most cells, but they must be targeted to specific genes in specific cell types in order to regulate pluripotency and differentiation. The recruitment of Polycomb complexes to specific targets has been widely thought to occur in two steps: first, one complex, PRC2, produces histone H3 lysine 27 (H3K27) trimethylation at a specific gene, and then the PRC1 complex is recruited by its ability to bind to H3K27me3. Now, three new articles turn this model upside-down by showing that binding of a variant PRC1 complex and subsequent H2A ubiquitylation of surrounding chromatin is sufficient to trigger the recruitment of PRC2 and H3K27 trimethylation. These studies also show that ubiquitylated H2A is directly sensed by PRC2 and that ablation of PRC1-mediated H2A ubiquitylation impairs genome-wide PRC2 binding and disrupts mouse development.

A goal of modern biology is to identify the physical interactions that define ‘functional modules’1 of proteins that govern biological processes. One essential regulatory process is the maintenance of master regulatory genes, such as homeotic genes, in an appropriate ‘on’ or ‘off’ state for the lifetime of an organism. The Polycomb group (PcG) of genes maintain a repressed transcriptional state, and PcG proteins form large multiprotein complexes2,3, but these complexes have not been described owing to inherent difficulties in purification. We previously fractionated a major PcG complex, PRC1, to 20–50% homogeneity from Drosophila embryos. Here, we identify 30 proteins in these preparations, then further fractionate the preparation and use western analyses to validate unanticipated connections. We show that the known PcG proteins Polycomb, Posterior sex combs, Polyhomeotic and dRING1 exist in robust association with the sequence-specific DNA-binding factor Zeste and with numerous TBP (TATA-binding-protein)-associated factors that are components of general transcription factor TFIID (dTAFIIs). Thus, in fly embryos, there is a direct physical connection between proteins that bind to specific regulatory sequences, PcG proteins, and proteins of the general transcription machinery.

The three-dimensional organization of the genome has an important role in orchestrating gene expression, but its regulation is poorly understood. Now, a new study uncovers a major role for Polycomb components of the PRC1 complex in organizing physical networks of genes that are co-repressed to maintain pluripotency.

CpG islands (CGIs) are associated with most mammalian gene promoters. A subset of CGIs act as polycomb response elements (PREs) and are recognized by the polycomb silencing systems to regulate expression of genes involved in early development. How CGIs function mechanistically as nucleation sites for polycomb repressive complexes remains unknown. Here we discover that KDM2B (FBXL10) specifically recognizes non-methylated DNA in CGIs and recruits the polycomb repressive complex 1 (PRC1). This contributes to histone H2A lysine 119 ubiquitylation (H2AK119ub1) and gene repression. Unexpectedly, we also find that CGIs are occupied by low levels of PRC1 throughout the genome, suggesting that the KDM2B-PRC1 complex may sample CGI-associated genes for susceptibility to polycomb-mediated silencing. These observations demonstrate an unexpected and direct link between recognition of CGIs by KDM2B and targeting of the polycomb repressive system. This provides the basis for a new model describing the functionality of CGIs as mammalian PREs. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.00205.001, eLife digest Gene expression in eukaryotic cells can be controlled in a number of different ways, including various epigenetic mechanisms that do not involve making changes to DNA sequences that define the genes themselves. A well-known epigenetic mechanism for silencing genes in vertebrates is DNA methylation—the addition of a methyl group (CH3) to cytosine, which is one of the four bases found in the DNA. Methylation is thought to silence genes by preventing transcription factors from binding to the DNA, and also by recruiting proteins that inhibit the transcription of DNA. DNA methylation occurs naturally throughout the genome, mostly at positions where cytosine is bonded to guanine to form a CpG dinucleotide. While the cytosine bases in most CpG dinucleotides are methylated, there are short stretches of DNA known as CpG islands that contain a high proportion of unmethylated CpG dinucleotides. These islands contain a large number of cytosine and guanine bases, and they are often found at or near transcription start sites. The lack of methylation at CpG islands has long been assumed to have a passive role in gene expression, leaving the DNA easily accessible and available for transcription factors to bind and initiate transcription. However, recent work suggests that CpG islands may have a more active role. In particular, it has been shown that specific proteins bind to CpG islands to create chromatin environments that are more favourable for the initiation of gene expression. Moreover, a subset of CpG islands can also bind polycomb-group proteins, including the polycomb repressive complex 1 (PRC1) that silence gene expression. These complexes have an important role in the regulation of genes during early development in animals, but the mechanism by which PRC1 recognizes CpG islands in mammals has remained enigmatic. Farcas et al. now reveal that a protein, KDM2B (FBXL10), can recognize CpG islands and recruit PRC1 to them. To achieve this, KDM2B encodes a DNA binding domain that specifically recognizes non-methylated CpG dinucleotides. By interacting biochemically with a variant PRC1 complex, KDM2B then nucleates PRC1 at CpG islands, and PRC1 activity silences certain polycomb target genes in embryonic stem cells. Surprisingly, Farcas et al. also find low but appreciable levels of PRC1 at most CpG islands genome-wide, in addition to the high levels of PRC1 at selected islands: this suggests that KDM2B may sample the whole genome to find CpG islands where PRC1 can establish silencing. An improved understanding of the polycomb repressive system, and the role of CpG islands within it, could lead to new insights into the role of epigenetic mechanisms in mammalian development. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.00205.002

Polycomb group (PcG) proteins play important roles in repressing lineage-specific genes and maintaining the undifferentiated state of mouse embryonic stem cells (mESCs). However, how PcG proteins are recruited to their target genes is largely unknown. Here, we show that the H3K36-specific histone demethylase Kdm2b is highly expressed in mESCs and regulated by the pluripotent factors Oct4 and Sox2 directly. Depletion of Kdm2b in mESCs causes de-repression of lineage-specific genes and induces early differentiation. The function of Kdm2b depends on its CxxC-ZF domain, which mediates its genome-wide binding to CpG islands (CGIs). Kdm2b interacts with the core components of polycomb repressive complex 1 (PRC1) and recruits the complex to the CGIs of early lineage-specific genes. Thus, our study not only reveals an Oct4-Sox2-Kdm2b-PRC1-CGI regulatory axis and its function in maintaining the undifferentiated state of mESCs, but also demonstrates a critical function of Kdm2b in recruiting PRC1 to the CGIs of lineage-specific genes to repress their expression.

Mutations in the Sex comb on midleg (Scm) gene in Drosophila cause strong derepression of homeotic genes, the hallmark phenotype of mutations in Polycomb group (PcG) genes. The SCM protein is conserved between Drosophila and mammals, but its role in PcG repression has remained elusive. In this issue, Wang et al. (14) provide evidence that SCM plays a role in recruitment of the well-characterized PcG protein complexes PRC1 and PRC2. Not only does this paper provide insight into the role of SCM in PcG repression, it helps to explain why Polycomb response elements (PREs), the DNA elements that bind PcG proteins in Drosophila, are so complex. PcG genes encode a diverse group of proteins that act together to repress gene expression (for recent reviews, see references 2 and 12). Originally discovered in Drosophila as important for maintenance of the spatially restricted expression patterns of homeotic genes, PcG proteins bind to hundreds of sites in the Drosophila genome and are now thought to regulate hundreds of genes. Similarly, mammalian PcG proteins are bound to hundreds of genes and are implicated in stem cell maintenance, as well as differentiation. Levels of PcG proteins are also altered in some cancers, where their misexpression may alter the expression levels of critical genes. At the Drosophila homeotic genes, PcG proteins are epigenetic silencers of gene expression, while at other loci, they may modulate expression levels. The regulation of gene expression by PcG proteins is an area of active exploration. Many PcG proteins act in protein complexes to modify chromatin. The best-characterized complexes, Polycomb repressive complexes 1 and 2 (PRC1 and PRC2), are conserved between Drosophila and mammals. Here we describe only the Drosophila complexes; the mammalian genome contains multiple paralogs of many of the Drosophila PcG genes. The core components of PRC1 in Drosophila are Polycomb (PC), Polyhomeotic (PH) (there are two homologs, PH-D and PH-P), RING (also called Sex combs extra [SCE]), and Posterior sex combs (PSC) [or its homolog SU(Z)2]. Biochemical activities attributed to PRC1 in vitro include inhibition of chromatin remodeling, inhibition of transcriptional elongation, and chromatin compaction. In addition, RING/SCE is an H2A ubiquitin ligase, but this biochemical activity is more likely mediated through another recently identified complex in Drosophila, RAF, which includes RING/SCE, PSC, and the demethylase KDM2 (encoded by the CG11033 gene), coupling histone H2A ubiquitylation to histone H3 demethylation (4). Thus, RING/SCE and PSC are present in two PcG complexes, and their activities must be evaluated in that light. PRC2 consists of the PcG proteins E(Z), ESC (or its homolog ESCL), SU(Z)12, and the histone-binding protein CAF1 (also known as NURF55). PRC2 methylates histone H3 at lysine 27, and H3K27me3 modified chromatin is a hallmark of PcG-regulated genes. Finally, the DNA-binding PcG protein Pleiohomeotic (PHO) (or its homolog PHOL) is in a complex called PhoRC (for Pho repressive complex) with the PcG protein SFMBT. All of these protein complexes are bound to PREs, but exactly how this occurs is unknown. How does SCM fit into this scheme? SCM copurifies with PRC1 in substoichiometric amounts. Further, SCM can interact with the PRC1 component PH in vitro and can even be incorporated into a PRC1 complex when coexpressed in the baculoviral system (8). Despite this, the bulk of SCM in Drosophila embryos is in an uncharacterized protein complex that is distinct from PRC1 (8). More recently, SCM has been shown to interact both physically and genetically with SFMBT (1). A discussion of the domains present in SCM, SFMBT, and PH is useful at this point in making sense of this information. The conserved protein domains in SCM provide some insight into function. The SCM proteins contain two copies of the mbt domain, a protein domain of about 100 amino acids that binds methylated histones. First identified in the Drosophila l(3)mbt [lethal (3) malignant brain tumor] protein, mbt domains appear to be present only in metazoans. In addition to SCM and l(3)mbt, Drosophila has a third mbt domain-containing protein, SFMBT (Scm-related gene containing four mbt domains). Urochordates and vertebrates have homologs of all three Drosophila mbt-containing proteins. The nematode Caenorhabditis elegans has only two MBT proteins (LIN61 and MBTR-1), both of which contain four mbt domains. Sequence comparisons also suggest that the nematode proteins are more related to SFMBT homologs than to SCM or l(3)mbt homologs. mbt domains appear to occur in tandem arrays with from two to four domains per protein, but for the Drosophila proteins, only the most carboxy-terminal mbt domain of each array appears to have a binding pocket that can accommodate methyl-lysine residues (1). The functions of the remaining mbt domains are not clear. There are also Zn finger motifs in all three Drosophila MBT proteins, as well as in the PRC1 component PH. The Drosophila SFMBT and SCM proteins interact physically through N-terminal fragments that include the Zn finger motifs (1). Finally, a C-terminal putative protein interaction domain, an SPM-type SAM (sterile alpha motif) domain, is present in SFMBT, SCM, and PH. The SCM SPM domain mediates interactions with the PH SPM domain, as well as with itself (8). Mutations in the SPM domain disrupt SCM function both in the endogenous gene and in an artificial repression system where SCM is tethered to DNA by a heterologous DNA-binding protein (10). Tethered SCM repression is dependent on PH, suggesting that SCM can recruit PH (and presumably PRC1) to DNA. Overexpression of the SCM SPM domain disrupts PcG repression by an unknown mechanism (8). It is worth noting that SAM domains may also be able to bind RNA, which could add to the complexity of PcG-induced silencing (3). How do all of these protein complexes (PhoRC, PRC1, PRC2, and the 500-kDa uncharacterized SCM complex) get recruited to the target genes? As stated above, PhoRC contains the DNA-binding protein PHO, and PHO-binding sites are required for the activity of all PREs tested so far. Some genome-wide studies suggest that PHO is bound at nearly all sites where PRC1 and/or PRC2 is bound, (11), whereas other studies suggest that it is bound at only 50% of these sites (cited in reference 12). Nevertheless, there is no doubt that PHO binding is an important component of many PREs. In experiments utilizing RNA interference (RNAi) and mutations to knock down various PcG proteins (approaches also used in the work described by Wang et al. [14]), PHO binding was required for the localization of both PRC1 and PRC2 to a PRE (13). Further, PRC1 binding was dependent on PRC2. The model that emerged from these studies is that PhoRC recruits PRC2, which then trimethylates histone H3K27. The PRC1 subunit PC then binds to H3K27me3, which could mediate PRC1 recruitment. In vitro, PHO interacts with the PRC2 subunits ESC and E(Z) as well as the PRC1 subunits PC and PH (6), suggesting that it could directly recruit both complexes. Enter SCM. Wang et al. (14) used RNAi and mutations to knock down expression levels of various PcG proteins and show that the binding of PRC1 and PRC2, but not PhoRC, to the PRE is SCM dependent. They further suggest that SCM might be in a complex with an unknown DNA-binding protein, protein X, and that the SCM-protein X complex could cooperate with PhoRC to recruit PRC1 and PRC2 (Fig. ​(Fig.1).1). This attractive model provides not only a role for the SCM protein but also a potential role for one of the myriad of other DNA-binding sites required for PRE function. FIG. 1. Model for the role of SCM in Polycomb-induced gene silencing. PHO-SFMBT and SCM-protein X are recruited independently to the PRE. SFMBT and SCM physically interact, and both facilitate either recruitment or retention of PRC2 and PRC1 at the PRE. PRC2 ... PREs are complex elements made up of binding sites for many different proteins (reviewed in references 7 and 9), including PHO, GAGA factor (GAF), Pipsqueak (PSQ) (which binds the same site as GAF), the Sp1/KLF family of proteins, DSP1, ZESTE, and Grainyhead (GRH). While the role of PHO sites in PRE function is well established, the roles of the other protein binding sites are less clear. Numerous studies have shown that GAF/PSQ-binding sites are important for PRE function, and in vitro studies suggest that binding of GAF may make the DNA more accessible to PHO binding (5). Genome-wide chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) studies show that only a subset of locations that bind PRC1 and/or PRC2 have GAF bound (11). It is not known whether PSQ associates with PREs in vivo. Likewise, DSP1 and ZESTE are bound only to a subset of PREs. There are 9 or 10 Sp1/KLF family members in Drosophila, and it is not known which, if any, are PRE associated. Thus, the current understanding of which proteins are necessary for PRE function is poor. Nevertheless, it is absolutely clear that PHO sites alone are not sufficient for PRE function, that PREs contain binding sites for at least three different proteins, and that mutation of any one binding site disrupts PRE function. Could one of the known PRE-binding proteins be protein X? Characterization of the proteins present in the 500-kDa embryonic SCM complex may provide the answer. Another approach is to look at whether SCM binds to PRE transgenes that contain mutations in the DNA-binding sites necessary for PRE activity. The model predicts that mutation of the site that binds protein X will cause a loss of SCM binding. This interesting paper (14) has brought us much closer to an understanding of PRE function and PcG recruitment.

Polycomb group (PcG) proteins are a special set of repressive transcription factors involved in epigenetic modifications of chromatin. They form two functionally distinct groups of catalytically active complexes: Polycomb repressive complex 1 (PRC1) and 2 (PRC2). The PRC1 complex is an important yet poorly characterized multiprotein histone ubiquitylation machine responsible for maintaining transcriptionally silent states of genes through histone H2A K119 modification. The Ring domain containing subunits of PRC1 also have substrate-targeting domains that interact with Cbx proteins, which have been implicated in chromatin and RNA binding. In this work, we present a high resolution structure of the C-terminal domain of Ring1B, revealing a variant ubiquitin-like fold with a distinct conserved surface region. On the basis of crystal structure and mutational analysis of this domain we show that the conserved surface is responsible for interaction with Cbx members of the PRC1 and homodimer formation. These data suggest a mechanism by which Ring1B serves as an adaptor that mediates binding between the members of the PRC1 complex and the nucleosome.

Ring1B/Rnf2 is a RING finger protein member of the Polycomb group (PcG) of proteins, which form chromatin-modifying complexes essential for embryonic development and stem cell renewal and which are commonly deregulated in cancer. Ring1B/Rnf2 is a ubiquitin E3 ligase that catalyzes the monoubiquitylation of the histone H2A, one of the histone modifications needed for the transcriptional repression activity of the PcG of proteins. Ring1B/Rnf2 was shown to be part of two complexes, the PRC1 PcG complex and the E2F6.com-1 complex, which also contains non-PcG members, thus raising the prospect for additional Ring1B/Rnf2 partners and functions extending beyond the PcG. Here we used a high throughput proteomics approach based on the single step purification, using streptavidin beads, of in vivo biotinylated Ring1B/Rnf2 and associated proteins from a nuclear extract from erythroid cells and their identification by mass spectrometry. About 50 proteins were confidently identified of which 20 had not been identified previously as subunits of Ring1B/Rnf2 complexes. We found that histone demethylases LSD1/Aof2 and Fbxl10/Jhdm1B, casein kinase subunits, and the BcoR corepressor were among the new interactors identified. We also isolated an Fbxl10/Jhdm1B complex by biotinylation tagging to identify shared interacting partners with Ring1B/Rnf2. In this way we identified a novel Ring1B-Fbxl10 complex that also includes Bcl6 corepressor (BcoR), CK2alpha, Skp1, and Nspc1/Pcgf1. The putative enzymatic activities and protein interaction and chromatin binding motifs present in this novel Ring1B-Fbxl10 complex potentially provide additional mechanisms for chromatin modification/recruitment to chromatin and more evidence for Ring1B/Rnf2 activities beyond those typically associated with PcG function. Lastly this work demonstrates the utility of biotinylation tagging for the rapid characterization of complex mixtures of multiprotein complexes achieved through the iterative use of this simple yet high throughput proteomics approach.

Polycomb group (PcG) proteins exist in at least two biochemically distinct protein complexes, the EED-EZH2 complex and the PRC1 complex, that respectively possess H3-K27 methyltransferase and H2A-K119 ubiquitin E3 ligase activities. How the enzymatic activities are regulated and what their role is in Hox gene silencing are not clear. Here, we demonstrate that Bmi-1 and Ring1A, two components of the PRC1 complex, play important roles in H2A ubiquitylation and Hox gene silencing. We show that both proteins positively regulate H2A ubiquitylation. Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) assays demonstrate that Bmi-1 and other components of the two PcG complexes bind to the promoter of HoxC13. Knockout Bmi-1 results in significant loss of H2A ubiquitylation and upregulation of Hoxc13 expression, whereas EZH2-mediated H3-K27 methylation is not affected. Our results suggest that EZH2-mediated H3-K27 methylation functions upstream of PRC1 and establishes a critical role for Bmi-1 and Ring1A in H2A ubiquitylation and Hox gene silencing.