Menstrual health represents an interdisciplinary concern that necessitates a broad, integrated understanding beyond its biological foundations, encompassing social, psychological, and cultural dimensions. This study examines whether the corpus of scientific literature from 1970 to 2023 aligns with this holistic perspective by exploring the evolving paradigms within menstrual health. Grounded in Kuhn's theoretical framework, the research delves into thematic shifts, author collaborations, and international partnerships that have emerged over the decades. Utilizing advanced text-mining methodologies, we analyzed a dataset of 34,854 documents obtained from Institute for Scientific Information Web of Science and PubMed in September 2023. These documents were processed through deduplication and data cleaning to ensure accuracy. The study employs a combination of univariate analyses, correspondence factor analyses, hierarchical cluster analyses, and network analyses to uncover insights into thematic evolution and collaborative dynamics within menstrual health research. Thematic analysis reveals three distinct periods in menstrual health research, depicting evolving paradigms. In the first period (1970–1996), the focus was on reproductive health, infertility treatments, hormonal regulation, and epidemiology. The second period (1997–2017) witnesses a transition, emphasizing menstrual health and social inequalities, gynecological studies, and contraception. The third period (2018–2023) maintains a focus on contraception and reproductive health but introduces a pronounced psychological dimension, emphasizing menstrual disorders, gynecological surgery, and socioeconomic concerns. Collaboration analysis indicates increased connectivity, consolidation of researcher communities, and a shift toward interdisciplinary approaches. While international collaborations demonstrate global commitment, geographical concentration prompts questions about paradigm universality. The study shows the existence and evolution of the menstrual health paradigm. Findings suggest a trajectory toward paradigmatic inscription, marked by heightened collaboration and global commitment. Acknowledging the pivotal role of biological aspects, the study underscores the need for a balanced, holistic understanding of menstrual health. Continued efforts are essential to tailor interventions, foster inclusivity, and honor diverse cultural and psychological realities related to menstruation. Plain language summary: Menstrual health isn't just about biology—it also touches on social, emotional, and cultural aspects. But how have researchers addressed this complex topic over the years? What did the researchers do ? In this study, the researchers examined research on menstrual health from 1970 to 2023. They used special tools to analyze how this research has changed over time, what themes were explored, and how scientists around the world have worked together. Why does this matter ? The researchers wanted to see if there's a clear and consistent way that menstrual health is approached in research. If there is, it can help improve health policies and medical practices. But if not, it could mean that different approaches are scattered, leading to less effective solutions. What did the researchers find ? After analyzing over 34,000 documents, the researchers identified three main phases in menstrual health research: • From 1970 to 1996, the focus was mostly on reproductive health. • Between 1997 and 2017, researchers started to look more at social inequalities and contraception. • Since 2018, there has been a new focus on the psychological aspects of menstruation. They also noticed that researchers are collaborating more than before, which is a good sign for a more integrated approach to menstrual health. However, even though interest in this topic is global, certain regions are more active in this research than others. This raises the question: is there a shared vision worldwide? Why is this important ? This work highlights how menstrual health research has evolved and suggests that a more comprehensive approach is needed to guide future studies and health policies. By better understanding the different dimensions of menstrual health, policymakers, healthcare providers, and researchers can create more inclusive and effective solutions for women everywhere. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]