7 results on '"Ortiz Pareja, M."'
Search Results
2. Efectividad de plerixafor en pacientes sometidos a movilización de progenitores hematopoyéticos para autotrasplante
- Author
-
Ruano Camps, R., Ortiz Pareja, M., Vidales Mancha, I., Muñoz Castillo, I. M., and Heiniger Mazo, A. I.
- Subjects
autologous stem cell transplantation ,Movilización progenitores hematopoyético ,Plerixador ,Plerixafor ,Autotrasplante progenitores hematopoyéticos ,stem cell mobilization - Abstract
Objetivo: Evaluar efectividad del tratamiento con plerixafor en pacientes sometidos a movilización para posterior autotrasplante de progenitores hematopoyéticos en nuestro hospital. Métodos: Estudio retrospectivo de todos los pacientes que hasta septiembre 2012, recibieron plerixafor en su esquema de movilización de progenitores hematopoyéticos a sangre periférica. Se revisaron las historias clínicas y los registros de dispensación de medicamentos de la consulta de pacientes externos. Las variables de efectividad utilizadas fueron: CD34/kg en producto de aféresis obtenidas, dosis y días recibidos de factor estimulante de colonias (G-CSF) y de plerixafor. Para cada paciente se comparó los resultados de efectividad del fármaco con los obtenidos para anteriores esquemas de movilización en los que no se utilizó plerixafor, en caso de tenerlos. Los datos se analizaron mediante IBM spss v19. Resultados: Un total de 24 pacientes recibieron plerixafor en nuestro hospital. Los diagnósticos se distribuyeron: 15 linfoma no Hodgkin , 6 pacientes con mieloma múltiple, 2 enfermedad de Hodgkin, y 1 coriocarcinoma diseminado. Los resultados de efectividad fueron: Movilización sin plerixafor (n = 18): 5 pacientes se movilizaron sólo con G-CSGF, 13 con G-CSF y quimioterapia. La dosis de G-CSF /día fue de 931,1 mcg (± 179,5), durante 9,5 días (± 4,7). El promedio de CD34/kg en producto obtenido fue de 0,2 células (± 0,5). Ningún paciente obtuvo producto suficiente (> 2 x 10(6) células/kg) para el posterior autotrasplante. El 100 % de las movilizaciones fracasaron. Movilización con plerixafor (n = 24): 13 pacientes se movilizaron sólo con G-CSGF, 11 con G-CSF y quimioterapia. La dosis de G-CSF /día y de plerixafor promedio fue de 885,1 mcg (± 240,1) y 19,8 (± 4,4), respectivamente, administrados durante 8,9 (± 5,1) y 1,5 (± 0,6) días, respectivamente. El promedio de CD34/kg en producto obtenido fue de 2,3x10(6) células (±1,7) (p = 0,014, en relación a las movilizaciones sin plerixafor). Sólo el 12,5% (n = 3) pacientes no pudieron someterse a autotrasplante. Conclusiones: En nuestros pacientes, plerixafor ha demostrado ser efectivo en la movilización de progenitores hematopoyéticos para posterior autotrasplante. Objective: To evaluate effectiveness of treatment with plerixafor in patients undergoing posterior mobilization for hematopoietic transplant at our hospital. Methods: Retrospective study of all patients who until September 2012, received plerixafor in their scheme of mobilization into peripheral blood hematopoietic progenitors. We reviewed the medical records and records of drug dispensing outpatient consultation. Effectiveness variables used were: CD34/kg in apheresis product obtained, and day dose received colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) and Plerixafor. Each patient was compared to the effectiveness of the drug results with those obtained earlier mobilization schemes where Plerixafor not used, if present. Data were analyzed using IBM SPSS v19. Results: A total of 24 patients received plerixafor in our hospital. Diagnoses were distributed: 15 NHL, 6 patients with multiple myeloma, 2 Hodgkin's disease, and one metastatic choriocarcinoma. The effectiveness outcomes were no plerixafor mobilization (n = 18): 5 patients were mobilized with G-CSGF only, 13 with G-CSF and chemotherapy. The G-CSF dose / day was mcg 931.1 (± 179.5) for 9.5 days (± 4.7). The average product obtained CD34/kg in cells was 0.2 (± 0.5). No patient received sufficient product (> 2 x 10(6) cells/kg) for subsequent autologous transplantation. 100% of the demonstrations failed. Mobilization with plerixafor (n = 24): 13 patients were mobilized with G-CSGF only, 11 with G-CSF and chemotherapy. The G-CSF dose/ day and averaged Plerixafor mcg 885.1 (± 240.1) and 19.8 (± 4.4), respectively, administered for 8.9 (± 5.1) and 1 , 5 (± 0.6) days, respectively. The average product obtained in CD34/kg was 2.3 x 10(6) cells (± 1.7) (p = 0.014 in relation to the demonstrations without Plerixafor). Only 12.5% (n = 3) patients were unable to undergo autologous transplant. Conclusions: In our patients, plerixafor has proven effective in mobilizing hematopoietic progenitors for autologous back.
- Published
- 2013
3. Efectividad de plerixafor en pacientes sometidos a movilización de progenitores hematopoyéticos para autotrasplante
- Author
-
Ruano Camps,R., Ortiz Pareja,M., Vidales Mancha,I., Muñoz Castillo,I. M., and Heiniger Mazo,A. I.
- Subjects
Movilización progenitores hematopoyético ,Plerixafor ,Autotrasplante progenitores hematopoyéticos - Abstract
Objetivo: Evaluar efectividad del tratamiento con plerixafor en pacientes sometidos a movilización para posterior autotrasplante de progenitores hematopoyéticos en nuestro hospital. Métodos: Estudio retrospectivo de todos los pacientes que hasta septiembre 2012, recibieron plerixafor en su esquema de movilización de progenitores hematopoyéticos a sangre periférica. Se revisaron las historias clínicas y los registros de dispensación de medicamentos de la consulta de pacientes externos. Las variables de efectividad utilizadas fueron: CD34/kg en producto de aféresis obtenidas, dosis y días recibidos de factor estimulante de colonias (G-CSF) y de plerixafor. Para cada paciente se comparó los resultados de efectividad del fármaco con los obtenidos para anteriores esquemas de movilización en los que no se utilizó plerixafor, en caso de tenerlos. Los datos se analizaron mediante IBM spss v19. Resultados: Un total de 24 pacientes recibieron plerixafor en nuestro hospital. Los diagnósticos se distribuyeron: 15 linfoma no Hodgkin , 6 pacientes con mieloma múltiple, 2 enfermedad de Hodgkin, y 1 coriocarcinoma diseminado. Los resultados de efectividad fueron: Movilización sin plerixafor (n = 18): 5 pacientes se movilizaron sólo con G-CSGF, 13 con G-CSF y quimioterapia. La dosis de G-CSF /día fue de 931,1 mcg (± 179,5), durante 9,5 días (± 4,7). El promedio de CD34/kg en producto obtenido fue de 0,2 células (± 0,5). Ningún paciente obtuvo producto suficiente (> 2 x 10(6) células/kg) para el posterior autotrasplante. El 100 % de las movilizaciones fracasaron. Movilización con plerixafor (n = 24): 13 pacientes se movilizaron sólo con G-CSGF, 11 con G-CSF y quimioterapia. La dosis de G-CSF /día y de plerixafor promedio fue de 885,1 mcg (± 240,1) y 19,8 (± 4,4), respectivamente, administrados durante 8,9 (± 5,1) y 1,5 (± 0,6) días, respectivamente. El promedio de CD34/kg en producto obtenido fue de 2,3x10(6) células (±1,7) (p = 0,014, en relación a las movilizaciones sin plerixafor). Sólo el 12,5% (n = 3) pacientes no pudieron someterse a autotrasplante. Conclusiones: En nuestros pacientes, plerixafor ha demostrado ser efectivo en la movilización de progenitores hematopoyéticos para posterior autotrasplante.
- Published
- 2013
4. COVID-19 severity and mortality in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia: a joint study by ERIC, the European Research Initiative on CLL, and CLL Campus
- Author
-
Tobias Herold, Martin Andres, Gimena Dos Santos, Livio Trentin, Monia Marchetti, Antonio Cuneo, Robin Foà, Vladimir Strugov, Sunil Iyengar, Ozren Jakšić, Mark-David Levin, Angela Ferrari, Francesca Romana Mauro, Candida Vitale, Martin Spacek, Olga Kalashnikova, Eugene Nikitin, Ann Janssens, Constantine S. Tam, Julio Delgado, Maria Papaioannou, Barbara Pocali, Davide Rossi, Marina Motta, Niki Stavroyianni, Myriam Foglietta, Alicia Enrico, Carolina Cuéllar-García, Lara Malerba, Mónica Baile, Lydia Scarfò, Ellen van der Spek, Paolo Sportoletti, Maria Rosaria De Paolis, Mihnea Zdrenghea, Macarena Ortiz Pareja, Annalisa Chiarenza, Sabina Kersting, Fatima Miras, Yair Herishanu, Emili Montserrat, Marta Coscia, Giuseppe Rossi, Jose Angel Hernandez-Rivas, Carsten Utoft Niemann, Alessandro Rambaldi, Amit Shrestha, Roberto Marasca, Rosa Ruchlemer, Marzia Varettoni, Dominique Bron, Juan Marquet, Eva Gimeno, Viola Maria Popov, Massimo Gentile, Mohamed A. Yassin, Kostas Stamatopoulos, Lorenzo De Paoli, Thomas Chatzikonstantinou, Giulia Quaresmini, Luca Laurenti, Lucia Farina, Arnon P. Kater, Nimish Shah, Elisabeth Vandenberghe, José A. García-Marco, Oana Stanca, Giovanni Del Poeta, Martin Simkovic, Yervand K Hakobyan, Enrico Lista, Michael Doubek, Gilad Itchaki, Talha Munir, Paolo Ghia, Ewa Wasik-Szczepanek, Gianluigi Reda, Francesca Maria Quaglia, Maria Dimou, Gábor Barna, Lorella Orsucci, Gian Matteo Rigolin, Scarfo', L., Chatzikonstantinou, T., Rigolin, G. M., Quaresmini, G., Motta, M., Vitale, C., Garcia-Marco, J. A., Hernandez-Rivas, J. A., Miras, F., Baile, M., Marquet, J., Niemann, C. U., Reda, G., Munir, T., Gimeno, E., Marchetti, M., Quaglia, F. M., Varettoni, M., Delgado, J., Iyengar, S., Janssens, A., Marasca, R., Ferrari, A., Cuellar-Garcia, C., Itchaki, G., Spacek, M., De Paoli, L., Laurenti, L., Levin, M. -D., Lista, E., Mauro, F. R., Simkovic, M., Van Der Spek, E., Vandenberghe, E., Trentin, L., Wasik-Szczepanek, E., Ruchlemer, R., Bron, D., De Paolis, M. R., Del Poeta, G., Farina, L., Foglietta, M., Gentile, M., Herishanu, Y., Herold, T., Jaksic, O., Kater, A. P., Kersting, S., Malerba, L., Orsucci, L., Popov, V. M., Sportoletti, P., Yassin, M., Pocali, B., Barna, G., Chiarenza, A., dos Santos, G., Nikitin, E., Andres, M., Dimou, M., Doubek, M., Enrico, A., Hakobyan, Y., Kalashnikova, O., Ortiz Pareja, M., Papaioannou, M., Rossi, D., Shah, N., Shrestha, A., Stanca, O., Stavroyianni, N., Strugov, V., Tam, C., Zdrenghea, M., Coscia, M., Stamatopoulos, K., Rossi, G., Rambaldi, A., Montserrat, E., Foa, R., Cuneo, A., Ghia, P., Experimental Immunology, Clinical Haematology, and CCA - Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life
- Subjects
0301 basic medicine ,Male ,Chronic lymphocytic leukaemia ,Cancer Research ,Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia, COVID-19 ,Chronic lymphocytic leukemia ,Comorbidity ,Severity of Illness Index ,chemistry.chemical_compound ,0302 clinical medicine ,Piperidines ,Obinutuzumab ,Surveys and Questionnaires ,hemic and lymphatic diseases ,80 and over ,Viral ,Chronic ,610 Medicine & health ,Immunodeficiency ,Aged, 80 and over ,Leukemia ,Mortality rate ,Age Factors ,Hematology ,Middle Aged ,Prognosis ,Lymphocytic ,Oncology ,030220 oncology & carcinogenesis ,Infectious diseases ,Female ,Coronavirus Infections ,medicine.drug ,Bendamustine ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Pneumonia, Viral ,Antineoplastic Agents ,Article ,NO ,03 medical and health sciences ,Betacoronavirus ,Internal medicine ,Severity of illness ,medicine ,Humans ,Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia ,Pandemics ,Protein Kinase Inhibitors ,Aged ,Retrospective Studies ,SARS-CoV-2 ,Venetoclax ,business.industry ,Adenine ,B-Cell ,COVID-19 ,Odds ratio ,Pneumonia ,medicine.disease ,Leukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-Cell ,Settore MED/15 - MALATTIE DEL SANGUE ,030104 developmental biology ,Pyrazoles ,Pyrimidines ,chemistry ,business - Abstract
Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is a disease of the elderly, characterized by immunodeficiency. Hence, patients with CLL might be considered more susceptible to severe complications from COVID-19. We undertook this retrospective international multicenter study to characterize the course of COVID-19 in patients with CLL and identify potential predictors of outcome. Of 190 patients with CLL and confirmed COVID-19 diagnosed between 28/03/2020 and 22/05/2020, 151 (79%) presented with severe COVID-19 (need of oxygen and/or intensive care admission). Severe COVID-19 was associated with more advanced age (≥65 years) (odds ratio 3.72 [95% CI 1.79–7.71]). Only 60 patients (39.7%) with severe COVID-19 were receiving or had recent (≤12 months) treatment for CLL at the time of COVID-19 versus 30/39 (76.9%) patients with mild disease. Hospitalization rate for severe COVID-19 was lower (p < 0.05) for patients on ibrutinib versus those on other regimens or off treatment. Of 151 patients with severe disease, 55 (36.4%) succumbed versus only 1/38 (2.6%) with mild disease; age and comorbidities did not impact on mortality. In CLL, (1) COVID-19 severity increases with age; (2) antileukemic treatment (particularly BTK inhibitors) appears to exert a protective effect; (3) age and comorbidities did not impact on mortality, alluding to a relevant role of CLL and immunodeficiency.
- Published
- 2020
5. COVID-19 severity and mortality in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia: a joint study by ERIC, the European Research Initiative on CLL, and CLL Campus.
- Author
-
Scarfò L, Chatzikonstantinou T, Rigolin GM, Quaresmini G, Motta M, Vitale C, Garcia-Marco JA, Hernández-Rivas JÁ, Mirás F, Baile M, Marquet J, Niemann CU, Reda G, Munir T, Gimeno E, Marchetti M, Quaglia FM, Varettoni M, Delgado J, Iyengar S, Janssens A, Marasca R, Ferrari A, Cuéllar-García C, Itchaki G, Špaček M, De Paoli L, Laurenti L, Levin MD, Lista E, Mauro FR, Šimkovič M, Van Der Spek E, Vandenberghe E, Trentin L, Wasik-Szczepanek E, Ruchlemer R, Bron D, De Paolis MR, Del Poeta G, Farina L, Foglietta M, Gentile M, Herishanu Y, Herold T, Jaksic O, Kater AP, Kersting S, Malerba L, Orsucci L, Popov VM, Sportoletti P, Yassin M, Pocali B, Barna G, Chiarenza A, Dos Santos G, Nikitin E, Andres M, Dimou M, Doubek M, Enrico A, Hakobyan Y, Kalashnikova O, Ortiz Pareja M, Papaioannou M, Rossi D, Shah N, Shrestha A, Stanca O, Stavroyianni N, Strugov V, Tam C, Zdrenghea M, Coscia M, Stamatopoulos K, Rossi G, Rambaldi A, Montserrat E, Foà R, Cuneo A, and Ghia P
- Subjects
- Adenine analogs & derivatives, Age Factors, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Antineoplastic Agents pharmacology, Antineoplastic Agents therapeutic use, COVID-19, Comorbidity, Coronavirus Infections diagnosis, Coronavirus Infections mortality, Female, Humans, Leukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-Cell drug therapy, Male, Middle Aged, Pandemics, Piperidines, Pneumonia, Viral diagnosis, Pneumonia, Viral mortality, Prognosis, Protein Kinase Inhibitors pharmacology, Protein Kinase Inhibitors therapeutic use, Pyrazoles pharmacology, Pyrazoles therapeutic use, Pyrimidines pharmacology, Pyrimidines therapeutic use, Retrospective Studies, SARS-CoV-2, Severity of Illness Index, Surveys and Questionnaires, Betacoronavirus, Coronavirus Infections pathology, Leukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-Cell complications, Pneumonia, Viral pathology
- Abstract
Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is a disease of the elderly, characterized by immunodeficiency. Hence, patients with CLL might be considered more susceptible to severe complications from COVID-19. We undertook this retrospective international multicenter study to characterize the course of COVID-19 in patients with CLL and identify potential predictors of outcome. Of 190 patients with CLL and confirmed COVID-19 diagnosed between 28/03/2020 and 22/05/2020, 151 (79%) presented with severe COVID-19 (need of oxygen and/or intensive care admission). Severe COVID-19 was associated with more advanced age (≥65 years) (odds ratio 3.72 [95% CI 1.79-7.71]). Only 60 patients (39.7%) with severe COVID-19 were receiving or had recent (≤12 months) treatment for CLL at the time of COVID-19 versus 30/39 (76.9%) patients with mild disease. Hospitalization rate for severe COVID-19 was lower (p < 0.05) for patients on ibrutinib versus those on other regimens or off treatment. Of 151 patients with severe disease, 55 (36.4%) succumbed versus only 1/38 (2.6%) with mild disease; age and comorbidities did not impact on mortality. In CLL, (1) COVID-19 severity increases with age; (2) antileukemic treatment (particularly BTK inhibitors) appears to exert a protective effect; (3) age and comorbidities did not impact on mortality, alluding to a relevant role of CLL and immunodeficiency.
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
6. [Effectiveness of plerixafor in patients undergoing mobilization autologous haematopoietic progenitor cell].
- Author
-
Ruano Camps R, Ortiz Pareja M, Vidales Mancha I, Muñoz Castillo IM, and Heiniger Mazo AI
- Subjects
- Adult, Antigens, CD34 analysis, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols pharmacology, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols therapeutic use, Benzylamines, Blood Cell Count, Blood Component Removal, Choriocarcinoma blood, Choriocarcinoma drug therapy, Choriocarcinoma secondary, Choriocarcinoma surgery, Combined Modality Therapy, Cyclams, Drug Evaluation, Drug Synergism, Female, Hematologic Neoplasms blood, Hematologic Neoplasms drug therapy, Hematologic Neoplasms surgery, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Pregnancy, Retrospective Studies, Transplantation, Autologous, Uterine Neoplasms blood, Uterine Neoplasms drug therapy, Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor pharmacology, Hematopoietic Stem Cell Mobilization methods, Heterocyclic Compounds pharmacology, Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation
- Abstract
Objective: To evaluate effectiveness of treatment with plerixafor in patients undergoing posterior mobilization for hematopoietic transplant at our hospital., Methods: Retrospective study of all patients who until September 2012, received plerixafor in their scheme of mobilization into peripheral blood hematopoietic progenitors. We reviewed the medical records and records of drug dispensing outpatient consultation. Effectiveness variables used were: CD34/kg in apheresis product obtained, and day dose received colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) and Plerixafor. Each patient was compared to the effectiveness of the drug results with those obtained earlier mobilization schemes where Plerixafor not used, if present. Data were analyzed using IBM SPSS v19., Results: A total of 24 patients received plerixafor in our hospital. Diagnoses were distributed: 15 NHL, 6 patients with multiple myeloma, 2 Hodgkin's disease, and one metastatic choriocarcinoma. The effectiveness outcomes were no plerixafor mobilization (n = 18): 5 patients were mobilized with G-CSGF only, 13 with G-CSF and chemotherapy. The G-CSF dose / day was mcg 931.1 (± 179.5) for 9.5 days (± 4.7). The average product obtained CD34/kg in cells was 0.2 (± 0.5). No patient received sufficient product (≥ 2 x 106 cells/kg) for subsequent autologous transplantation. 100% of the demonstrations failed. Mobilization with plerixafor (n = 24): 13 patients were mobilized with GCSGF only, 11 with G-CSF and chemotherapy. The G-CSF dose/ day and averaged Plerixafor mcg 885.1 (± 240.1) and 19.8 (± 4.4), respectively, administered for 8.9 (± 5.1) and 1 , 5 (± 0.6) days, respectively. The average product obtained in CD34/kg was 2.3 x 106 cells (± 1.7) (p = 0.014 in relation to the demonstrations without Plerixafor). Only 12.5% (n = 3) patients were unable to undergo autologous transplant., Conclusions: In our patients, plerixafor has proven effective in mobilizing hematopoietic progenitors for autologous back., (Copyright © 2013 SEFH. Published by AULA MEDICA. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2013
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
7. [Quarantine and plasmapheresis].
- Author
-
Ortiz Pareja M, Terol Fernández E, Hernández Lamas MC, and Sánchez Gordo F
- Subjects
- Blood Donors psychology, Blood Donors statistics & numerical data, Blood Transfusion statistics & numerical data, Female, Humans, Male, Retrospective Studies, Safety, Time Factors, Virus Diseases blood, Virus Diseases prevention & control, Virus Diseases transmission, Blood Preservation, Blood Transfusion standards, Cryopreservation, Plasma virology, Plasmapheresis
- Published
- 1998
Catalog
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.