Search

To investigate the value of using the Gesell Development Diagnosis Scale (GDDS) to predict developmental outcomes in very young children who undergo simultaneous bilateral cochlear implantation.In this prospective cohort study, a repeated-measures investigation was conducted in a tertiary referral hospital. A total of 62 children receiving simultaneous bilateral cochlear implantations were enrolled from April 2017 to August 2018. They were divided into 2 groups depending on the operative age: "Infants" group (6 to 12 months, N = 38) or "Children" group (12 to 36 months, N = 24). Data on the surgical outcomes, auditory development, speech production, and developmental indicators were collected until 2 years after the initial fitting. The primary outcome measure was the GDDS, a neuropsychological development examination. Secondary outcomes included the following: complication rate, aided pure-tone average, Infant-Toddler Meaningful Auditory Integration Scale, Categories of Auditory Performance-II, Meaningful Use of Speech Scale, Speech Intelligibility Rating, and the LittlEARS Auditory Questionnaire.The mean ages at implantation in infants and children groups were 9.2 ± 1.17 and 16.6 ± 3.60 months, respectively. Significant differences were found in the social skills (p = 0.001) and adaptability (p = 0.031) domains of GDDS. The younger the age of bilateral cochlear implants surgery, the higher developmental quotient of language, social skills, and adaptability the child could achieve after 2 years. The complication rates in the infants and children groups were 0% versus 2.1% (p = 0.57). There was no surgical complication in the infants group. In the children group, 1 case with enlarged vestibular aqueduct and Mondini malformation had a receiver-implant misplacement on the right side (2%, 1/48). In the two groups, auditory performance and speech production had improved similarly. In the infants group, social skills developmental quotient at baseline had a significant positive relationship with Meaningful Use of Speech Scale after 2 years.Simultaneous bilateral cochlear implantation in younger children improves adaptability and social skills. GDDS is a sensitive tool of evaluating short-term effect of bilateral cochlear implants in neuropsychological development and constitutes a reliable predictor of speech production for the very younger pediatric cochlear implant users.

International audience; Post-operative outcomes for hearing after resection surgery to remove cerebellopontine angle (CPA) tumors other than vestibular schwannomas (VS) are not well understood. This study presents a series of patients with significant postoperative hearing recovery, trying to define the incidence among all patients operated on for removal of non-VS CPA tumors. Methods: This is a retrospective observational case series of 8 patients among 69 operated on for removal of non-VS CPA tumors between 2012 and 2020. All patients had pre-and post-operative hearing measurement with pure-tone average (PTA) and speech discrimination score (SDS), according to the American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery recommendations, auditory brainstem response (ABR) measurements and imaging. Results: Six meningiomas and two lower cranial nerve schwannomas operated on with a retrosigmoid approach were included for analysis. The mean pre-operative PTA and SDS were 58±20.7 dB and 13±17.5%, respectively. All patients had pre-operative class D hearing and asynchronous ABRs. They all showed significant hearing recovery, with an improvement of 36±22.2 dB (p=0.0025) and 85±16.9% (p=0.0001) in PTA and SDS, respectively, with mean follow-up of 21±23.5 months. Seven patients recovered to a class A hearing level and one patient to class B. The ABRs became synchronous for three patients. The incidence of auditory recovery was 13% for patients operated on with a conservative approach (n=60). Conclusion: A significant post-operative improvement in hearing could be a reasonable expectation in non-VS tumors extending into the CPA and a retrosigmoid approach should always be considered regardless of pre-operative hearing status.

Treatment of neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF2) associated vestibular schwannomas (VS) can prove challenging because of the various choices, from observation to surgery and radiosurgery with medical treatment opportunities, sometimes within clinical trials. Some factors direct the treatment decision tree such as size of VS and hearing level. Others factors have to be considered such as patient clinical status, inherited situation, and contralateral VS characteristics. All these factors are detailed, discussed, and weighted in this review. Another essential part of the clinical management of patients with NF2 includes the hearing rehabilitation process using either cochlear or auditory brainstem implants. The management of VS in patients with NF2 has become difficult, owing to a multitude of solution options, and should be performed in reference NF2 centers.

International audience; The scalar position of the electrode array is assumed to be associated with auditory performance after cochlear implantation. We propose a new method that can be routinely applied in clinical practice to assess the position of an electrode array. Ten basilar membrane templates were generated using micro-computed tomography (micro-CT), based on the dimensions of 100 cochleae. Five surgeons were blinded to determine the position of the electrode array in 30 cadaveric cochleae. The procedure consisted of selecting the appropriate template based on cochlear dimensions, merging the electrode array reconstruction with the template using four landmarks, determining the position of the array according to the template position, and comparing the results obtained to histology data. The time taken to analyze each implanted cochlea was approximately 12 min. We found that, according to histology, surgeons were in almost perfect agreement when determining an electrode translocated to the scala vestibuli with the perimodiolar MidScala array (Fleiss’ kappa (κ) = 0.82), and in moderate agreement when using the lateral wall EVO array (κ = 0.42). Our data indicate that an adapted basilar membrane template can be used as a rapid and reproducible method to assess the position of the electrode array after cochlear implantation.

OBJECTIVE To describe the first cochlear array insertions using a robot-assisted technique, with different types of straight or precurved electrode arrays, compared with arrays manually inserted into the cochlea. STUDY DESIGN Retrospective review. SETTING Tertiary otologic center. PATIENTS Twenty cochlear implantations in the robot-assisted group and 40 in the manually inserted group. INTERVENTIONS Cochlear implantations using a robot-assisted technique (RobOtol) with straight (eight Cochlear CI522/622, and eight Advanced Bionics Hifocus Slim J) or precurved (four Advanced Bionics Hifocus Mid-Scala) matched to manual cochlear implantations. Three-dimensional reconstruction images of the basilar membrane and the electrode array were obtained from pre- and postimplantation computed tomography. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Rate and localization of scalar translocations. RESULTS For straight electrode arrays, scalar translocations occurred in 19% (3/16) of the robot-assisted group and 31% (10/32) of the manually inserted group. Considering the number of translocated electrodes, this was lower in the robot-assisted group (7%) than in the manually inserted group (16%) (p

Objective To study the surgical results, intracochlear position of the electrode array (EA) and auditory performance of the LISTENT LCI-20PI cochlear implant device, and daily use status at 3 years. Study design A retrospective study. Setting A single-tertiary referral center. Patients Between January and December 2016, 20 patients underwent cochlear implantation using the LISTENT LCI-20PI (lateral wall EA). Intervention Cochlear implantation. Main outcome measures Measurement of cochlear size, extent of posterior tympanotomy, and insertion depth. Scalar position of the EA evaluated by 3D reconstruction. Auditory outcomes 1 year after implantation and daily use status at 3 years. Results EAs were completely inserted in all cases with an insertion depth of 288 ± 36.8 degrees. One year later, the average sentence recognition score (SRS) was 90 ± 21.7%. EA scalar location was analyzed in 18 patients. Thirteen EAs (72.2%) were fully inserted into the scala tympani (ST) and 5 (27.8%) had shifted from the ST to the scala vestibuli (SV). There was no statistically significant difference in cochlear size, extent of posterior tympanotomy, or insertion depth between these two groups. EAs inserted by cochleostomy had a higher chance of scalar shift than those inserted via the round window (60% vs 15.4%, p = 0.099). SRS at 1 year with full ST insertion was significantly better than in those with scalar shift (99 ± 1.3% vs 83 ± 16.5%, p = 0.002). Three years after implantation, 92% of patients were daily users and 46% were telephone users. Conclusions The LISTENT LCI-20PI provided accredited hearing rehabilitation with a short insertion depth. Full insertion into the ST was associated with better cochlear implantation outcomes.

International audience; Objectives: Telephone use correlates with quality of life, and is one of the most important expectations of cochlear implant candidates. The aim of the present study was to assess the benefit of a progressive intensive 18-session training program, conducted by telephone in cochlear implant recipients.Material and methods: Nine cochlear-implanted adults underwent telerehabilitation focused on telephone use, with before-and-after assessment of: auditory performance, on Lafon monosyllabic words and MBAA sentences in quiet, cocktail-party noise and by phone; telephone use, on ad-hoc surveys and number of calls per week; and quality of life on ERSA and APHAB questionnaires.Results: Before training, monosyllabic word comprehension was poorer by telephone than by direct voice (64±5.7% vs. 26±5.3%; P

Middle ear surgery may benefit from robot-based assistance to hold micro-instruments or an endoscope. However, the surgical gesture performed by one hand may perturb surgeons accustomed to two-handed surgery. A robot-based holder may combine the benefits from endoscopic exposure and a two-handed technique. Furthermore, tremor suppression and accurate tool control might help the surgeon during critical surgical steps. The goal of this work was to study the safety of an otological robot-based assistant under clinical conditions in a limited series of patients. The RobOtol system has been used as an endoscope or a micro instrument holder for this series. Eleven cases were operated on with the robot as an endoscope holder for chronic otitis. Twenty-one cases were operated on with the robot as a micro-instrument holder for otosclerosis (9 cases), transtympanic tube placement (2 cases), or cochlear implantation (10 cases). No complications related to the robot manipulation occurred during surgery nor in postoperative. In the chronic otitis group, all perforations were sealed and 3-month postoperative pure-tone average air–bone gap (PTA ABG) was 15 ± 2.6 dB. In the otosclerosis group, 1-month post-op PTA ABG was 10 ± 1 dB. For cochlear implantation cases, a scala tympani insertion, a vestibular scala translocation occurred and a full scala vestibuli insertion was observed in 7, 2 and 1 case, respectively. The RobOtol system has reached the clinical stage. It could be used safely and with accurate control as an endoscope holder or a micro instrument holder in 32 cases

Facial nerve (FN) outcome has been improved by deciding upon the degree of vestibular schwannoma (VS) resection guided by intraoperative facial nerve monitoring (IOFM). This study aimed to evaluate hearing and FN outcomes following IOFM-guided VS removal through a retrosigmoid approach (RS). Between January 2015 and August 2017, 77 patients undergoing VS resection through RS, regardless of their preoperative hearing or tumor size, were included in this monocentric retrospective study. Total or near-/subtotal resection was decided intraoperatively according to IOFM. Partial resection was planned preoperatively. Pre- and postoperative FN function (House-Brackmann) and hearing level (AAO-HNS and Gardner-Robertson (GR) scales) were reported. Predictive factors for hearing preservation were analyzed according to a score developed to take into account pre-/postoperative hearing evolution. The mean extrameatal diameter was 17 ± 8.5 mm. VS resection was total, near-/subtotal, and partial in 71%, 21%, and 8% of cases, respectively. Postoperative grade I and II FN function was achieved in 91% of patients. Serviceable (A+B or GR I+II) hearing and hearing with intelligibility (A+B+C or GR I–III) were preserved in 30% and 43% of cases, respectively. In multivariate analysis, preoperative synchronized auditory brainstem responses (ABR) were the only predictive factor (p = 0.006) imparting a five times greater chance of hearing preservation. IOFM-guided VS excision through RS, whatever the VS size and hearing level, achieved a high rate of good postoperative FN function together with significant hearing preservation, and it should be used if hearing with some intelligibility is still present preoperatively, even in large VS.

Objective To evaluate the surgical results and complications in a cohort of patients operated on to repair a tegmen bony defect using either transmastoid approach with obliteration using S53P4 bioactive glass granules (TMA-O), or the classic middle cranial fossa approach (MCFA). Study design A retrospective monocentric study. Methods Twenty-five cases (24 patients) were included. Data regarding patient demographics, etiology, intraoperative findings, complications, recurrences, audiometric data, and follow-up were analyzed. Results Seven patients were operated with MCFA and 17 patients with TMA-O. One patient was operated on using a combined approach (MCFA + TMA-O). In the preoperative HRCT scan, the size of the defect was estimated to be 6 ± 3.8 mm in the TMA-O group and 6 ± 3.5 mm in the MCFA group (P = .969). Intraoperatively, in the MCFA group, the location of the defect was mostly anterior (86%) with an intact ossicular chain (86%). A discontinuous chain was observed in 15 patients (88%) in the TMA-O group. The mean follow-up time was 22 ± 14 months in the TMA-O group and 24 ± 15 months in the MCFA group (P = .762). In both groups, there were no early postoperative complications or recurrences during follow-up. Conclusion Repair of a tegmen bony defect with S53P4 bioactive glass granules seems to be safe and effective, limiting the use of the middle cranial fossa approach to cases with epitympanic defects and with an intact ossicular chain, and it could be used whatever the size of the defect and/or the presence of meningoencephalocele. Level of evidence 4.

Cochlear implantation is usually not recommended for prelingual profoundly deaf adults, although some of these patients might benefit from it. This study aims to define the candidates for cochlear implantation in this population. This retrospective study reviewed 34 prelingual profoundly deaf patients who had received a cochlear implant at 32 ± 1.7 years old (16–55), with at least 1 year of follow-up. Speech perception and quality of life were assessed before and 3, 6, and 12 months after cochlear implantation, then every year thereafter. According to the word speech intelligibility in quiet (WSI) 1 year after implantation, two groups were identified: good performer (GP) with WSI ≥ 50% (n = 15), and poor performer (PP) with WSI ≤ 40% (n = 19). At the 1 year mark, mean WSI improved by 28 ± 4.6% (−20–100) (p < 0.0001). In GP, the intelligibility for words and sentences, communication and quality of life scales improved. In PP, the communication scale improved, but not auditory performance or quality of life. GP and PP differed pre-operatively in speech production, communication abilities, and WSI in best-aided conditions. In prelingual profoundly deaf adults, a dramatic auditory performance benefit could be expected after cochlear implantation if the patients have some degree of speech intelligibility in aided conditions and have developed oral communication and speech production.

Introduction: Electrode array translocation is an unpredictable event with all types of arrays, even using a teleoperated robot in a clinical scenario. We aimed to compare the intracochlear trauma produced by the HiFocus™ Mid-Scala (MS) electrode array (Advanced Bionics, Valencia, CA, USA) using a teleoperated robot, with an automated robot connected to a navigation system to align the pre-curved tip of the electrode array with the coiling direction of the scala tympani (ST). Methods: Fifteen freshly frozen temporal bones were implanted with the MS array using the RobOtol® (Collin, Bagneux, France). In the first group (n = 10), the robot was teleoperated to insert the electrode array into the basal turn of the ST under stereomicroscopic vision, and then the array was driven by a slow-speed hydraulic insertion technique with an estimated placement of the pre-curved electrode tip. In the second group (n = 5), 3 points were obtained from the preoperative cone-beam computed tomography: the 2 first defining the ST insertion axis of the basal turn and a third one at the center of the ST at 270°. They provided the information to the automated system (RobOtol® connected with a navigation system) to automatically align the electrode array with the ST insertion axis and to aim the pre-curved tip toward the subsequent coiling of the ST. After this, the electrode array was manually advanced. Finally, the cochleae were obtained and fixed in a crystal resin, and the position of each electrode was determined by a micro-grinding technique. Results: In all cases, the electrode array was fully inserted into the cochlea and the depth of insertion was similar using both techniques. With the teleoperated robotic technique, translocations of the array were observed in 7/10 insertions (70%), but neither trauma nor array translocation occurred with automated robotic insertion. Conclusion: We have successfully tested an automated insertion system (robot + navigation) that could accurately align a pre-curved electrode array to the axis of the basal turn of the ST and its subsequent coiling, which reduced intracochlear insertion trauma and translocation.

To evaluate the appearance of mastoid and epitympanic obliteration using S53P4 bioactive glass (BG) granules in high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) and MRI. Patients undergoing mastoid and epitympanic obliteration between May 2013 and December 2015 were prospectively included in an uncontrolled clinical study. All patients underwent a temporal HRCT scan 1 year after surgery, aimed at evaluating the attenuation, homogeneity, and osseointegration of the BG granules, as well as the ventilation of the middle ear and the volume of the obliterated paratympanic spaces. If a cholesteatoma was found during surgery, additional MRI, including at least pre- and post-contrast T1-weighted, T2-weighted, and axial non-echo-planar diffusion-weighted (DW) sequences, was performed 1 year after surgery, to study the normal signal of the BG granules and the presence of residual cholesteatoma and/or other temporal bone pathologies. Seventy cases were included. On 1-year HRCT, the mean attenuation of the BG granules was 888.34 ± 166.10 HU. The obliteration was found to be mostly homogeneous with partial osseointegration. The appearance of the BG granules having a low-intensity signal in T2-weighted imaging and DW MRI was always different from the appearance of cholesteatoma. A longer follow-up has shown no attenuation or signal modification of the BG granules compared with the 1-year imaging. Radiological follow-up of patients operated on with mastoid and epitympanic obliteration using BG granules is effective using both HRCT and MRI. A cholesteatoma and/or other potential complications could easily be detected due to the specific radiological appearance of the BG granules. • The appearance of mastoid and epitympanic obliteration by S53P4 bioactive glass (BG) granules on high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) scans was homogeneous with an attenuation significantly higher than the attenuation of cholesteatoma and lower than mastoid bone attenuation. • The granules have a low-intensity signal on non-echo-planar diffusion-weighted sequences and on T2-weighted images and present contrast enhancement allowing the differential diagnosis with cholesteatoma and effective for the detection of other underlying temporal bone pathologies. • The volume and radiological appearance of the obliteration appear to be stable with time.

International audience; Middle ear adenomatous neuroendocrine tumours are extremely rare causes of middle ear masses. Differential diagnosis is of primary importance to decide on the correct management since they require surgery whereas other lesions can be actively watched.CT and MRI show a non‐hypervascular lesion, differentiating it from paraganglioma. It is a mesotympanic lesion that usually encases the ossicles without bone erosion and it can invade the retrotympanum and Eustachian tube.Radical surgery is the treatment of choice. Since middle ear adenomatous neuroendocrine tumours adhere to adjacent structures and lack a tumour capsule, gross total resection is challenging.Late recurrences may be observed and complicated by the development of middle ear cholesteatoma, emphasising the importance of a long follow‐up.Recurrence can be associated with neural and intracranial invasion, lymph node or distant metastasis, highlighting the malignant potential of middle ear adenomatous neuroendocrine tumours.

Introduction: Cochlear implantation is a recent approach proposed to treat single-sided deafness (SSD) and asymmetric hearing loss (AHL). Several cohort studies showed its effectiveness on tinnitus and variable results on binaural hearing. The main objective of this study is to assess the outcomes of cochlear implantation and other treatment options in SSD/AHL on quality of life. Methods: This prospective multicenter study was conducted in 7 tertiary university hospitals and included an observational cohort study of SSD/AHL adult patients treated using contralateral routing of the signal (CROS) hearing aids or bone-anchored hearing systems (BAHSs) or who declined all treatments, and a randomized controlled trial in subjects treated by cochlear implantation, after failure of CROS and BAHS trials. In total, 155 subjects with SSD or AHL, with or without associated tinnitus, were enrolled. After 2 consecutive trials with CROS hearing aids and BAHSs on headband, all subjects chose any of the 4 treatment options (abstention, CROS, BAHS, or cochlear implant [CI]). The subjects who opted for a CI were randomized between 2 arms (CI vs. initial observation). Six months after the treatment choice, quality of life was assessed using both generic (EuroQoL-5D, EQ-5D) and auditory-specific quality-of-life indices (Nijmegen Cochlear implant Questionnaire [NCIQ] and Visual Analogue Scale [VAS] for tinnitus severity). Performances for speech-in-noise recognition and localization were measured as secondary outcomes. Results: CROS was chosen by 75 subjects, while 51 opted for cochlear implantation, 18 for BAHSs, and 11 for abstention. Six months after treatment, both EQ-5D VAS and auditory-specific quality-of-life indices were significantly better in the “CI” arm versus “observation” arm. The mean effect of the CI was particularly significant in subjects with associated severe tinnitus (mean improvement of 20.7 points ± 19.7 on EQ-5D VAS, 20.4 ± 12.4 on NCIQ, and 51.4 ± 35.4 on tinnitus). No significant effect of the CI was found on binaural hearing results. Before/after comparisons showed that the CROS and BAHS also improved significantly NCIQ scores (for CROS: +7.7, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] = [4.5; 10.8]; for the BAHS: +14.3, 95% CI = [7.9; 20.7]). Conclusion: Cochlear implantation leads to significant improvements in quality of life in SSD and AHL patients, particularly in subjects with associated severe tinnitus, who are thereby the best candidates to an extension of CI indications.

Post-operative outcomes for hearing after resection surgery to remove cerebellopontine angle (CPA) tumors other than vestibular schwannomas (VS) are not well understood. This study presents a series of patients with significant post-operative hearing recovery, trying to define the incidence among all patients operated on for removal of non-VS CPA tumors.This is a retrospective observational case series of 8 patients among 69 operated on for removal of non-VS CPA tumors between 2012 and 2020. All patients had pre- and post-operative hearing measurement with pure-tone average (PTA) and speech discrimination score (SDS), according to the American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery recommendations, auditory brainstem response (ABR) measurements and imaging.Six meningiomas and two lower cranial nerve schwannomas operated on with a retrosigmoid approach were included for analysis. The mean pre-operative PTA and SDS were 58 ± 20.7 dB and 13 ± 17.5%, respectively. All patients had pre-operative class D hearing and asynchronous ABRs. They all showed significant hearing recovery, with an improvement of 36 ± 22.2 dB (p = 0.0025) and 85 ± 16.9% (p = 0.0001) in PTA and SDS, respectively, with mean follow-up of 21 ± 23.5 months. Seven patients recovered to a class A hearing level and one patient to class B. The ABRs became synchronous for three patients. The incidence of auditory recovery was 13% for patients operated on with a conservative approach (n = 60).A significant post-operative improvement in hearing could be a reasonable expectation in non-VS tumors extending into the CPA and a retrosigmoid approach should always be considered regardless of pre-operative hearing status.

Objectives: To describe the treatment choice in a cohort of subjects with single-sided deafness (SSD) and asymmetric hearing loss (AHL). To assess the reliability of the treatment trials. Design: In this national, multicentre, prospective study, the choice of subjects was made after two consecutive trials of Contralateral Routing Of the Signal (CROS) hearing aids and a Bone Conduction Device (BCD) on a headband. Subjects could proceed with one of these two options, opt for cochlear implantation or decline all treatments. Setting: Seven tertiary university hospitals. Participants: One hundred fifty-five subjects with SSD or AHL fulfilling the candidacy criteria for cochlear implantation, with or without associated tinnitus. Main outcome measures: After the two trials, the number of subjects choosing each option was described. Repeated assessments of both generic and auditory-specific quality of life were conducted, as well as hearing assessments (speech recognition in noise and horizontal localization). Results: CROS was chosen by 75 subjects, followed by cochlear implantation (n = 51), BCD (n = 18) and abstention (n = 11). Patients who opted for cochlear implantation had a poorer quality of life (P = .03). The improvement of quality of life indices after each trial was significantly associated with the final treatment choice (P = .008 for generic indices, P = .002 for auditory-specific indices). The follow-up showed that this improvement had been overestimated in the CROS group, with a long-term retention rate of 52.5%. Conclusions: More than one third of SSD/AHL subjects are unsatisfied after CROS and BCD trials. Repeated quality of life assessments help counselling the patient for his/her treatment choice.

Decision-making for large sporadic vestibular schwannomas (VS) resection guided by the intraoperative change in supramaximal facial nerve (FN) amplitude and latency response to optimize post-operative FN outcome. Prospectively study of 43 patients, from January to December 2018, of large sporadic VS with preoperative normal FN function at our center. Tumors were removed through retrosigmoid (81%) or translabyrinthine (19%) approaches with FN monitoring. Intraoperative pre- and post-VS resection supramaximal (2 mA) amplitude and latency responses at the proximal FN root were recorded. Total, near-/subtotal VS resections (TR, NTR, STR) were achieved in 51%, 38%, and 11% of tumors, respectively, guided by no more than 40% decrease in supramaximal amplitude. Pre- and post-resection supramaximal amplitude and latency responses were lower and longer, respectively, in NTR+STR than in TR. At day 8, FN function was grade I–II in 77% of patients and grade III–V in 23%, and after 6 months, it was in grade I-II in 95% and grade III in 5%, and there was no significant difference between TR and NTR+STR. Facial palsy occurred in older patients and in the case of severe FN adhesion. At day 8, pre- and post-resection supramaximal amplitude but not latency responses were different between FN grade III-V and grade I-II. Serviceable hearing was preserved in 28% of large VS. Intraoperative FN monitoring guided VS resection in large VS so that 49% retained some residual tumor. Accordingly, 95% good postoperative FN function and significant hearing preservation were achieved after 6 months.

Objectives :To analyze the performance of cochlear implants in French patients aged 65 and over, implanted between 2012 and 2016, using data from the French national registry for cochlear implants (EPIIC). Materials and methods : The French national registry incorporates patient data from before implantation and for three years after implantation, stratified in different age groups (18–39, 40–64 years, 65–74 years and > 75 years). Here, we assessed the latter two categories. Hearing was assessed using mono- and disyllabic words in a silent background. The Category of Auditory Performance (CAP) scale was also implemented and subjects took the Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit (Aphab) questionnaire. Results : The population aged over 65 accounted for 38% (n = 1193) of the 3178 adult implanted patients. The performance for mono- and disyllabic words in silence, the CAP scores and the APHAB questionnaire answers for ease of communication, background noise and reverberation were dramatically improved at one year post-implantation (P < 0.0001 for each score) and remained stable between one and three years thereafter. The percentage improvement was similar across all age groups. The scores for loud-noise intolerance did not change after cochlear implantation in any age group. Conclusion : Cochlear implants improve hearing and communication in subjects aged 65 and over, with comparable efficiency to that achieved in younger subjects. Cochlear implantation should thus be proposed whenever hearing aids provide only limited benefit. However, between 2012 and 2016, cochlear implantation was given to less than 1% of the French population aged 65 and over with profound deafness.

To evaluate the forces involved in different manipulations, manual or robot-assisted, applied to the ossicular chain, on normal temporal bones and on an anatomical model of otosclerosis.Thirteen cadaveric temporal bones, with mobile footplates or with footplates that were fixed using hydroxyapatite cement, were manipulated, manually or using a robotic arm (RobOtol®). "Short contact" of a mobile footplate was the weakest interaction on the incus. "Long contact" was the same manipulation held for 10 s. "Mobilization" was the smallest visualized movement of the mobile footplate, or the movement necessary to regain mobility of the fixed footplate. A six-axis force sensor (Nano17, ATI) measured the maximal peak of forces, summation of forces applied, and yank.Maximal forces during short (~4 mN) and long contact (~15 mN) were similar for manual and robot-assisted manipulations. For manual manipulation, yank measured during long contact was twice as high compared to robot-assisted manipulation: 6 ± 2.4 (n = 5) and 3 ± 1.3 mN/s (n = 5), respectively (mean ± SD, p 0.02). For mobilization of the mobile footplate, maximal forces during mobilization were similar during manual and robot-assisted manipulations, respectively: 12 ± 2.5 (n = 6) and 19 ± 7.6 mN (n = 7). Compared with mobilization of a mobile footplate, mobilization of a fixed footplate required ~ 60 and ~ 27 times higher maximal forces for manual and robot-assisted manipulations, respectively: 724 ± 366.4 and 507 ± 283.2 mN. Yank was twice as high during manual manipulation compared to robot-assisted manipulation (p 0.05).Robot-assisted manipulation of the ossicular chain was reliable. Our anatomical model of otosclerosis was successfully developed requiring higher forces for stapes mobilization.

OBJECTIVE Recently, treatment decision making for large vestibular schwannomas (VS) in patients with neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF2) has become increasingly challenging due to the availability of multiple therapeutic options including surgery, bevacizumab (an anti-VEGF), radiosurgery, and observation; and it often remains an arbitrary decision based on local practices without firm recommendations. Our objective is to discuss the multimodal treatment options for Koos IV VS in a national reference center for NF2. STUDY DESIGN Single-institution retrospective cohort study. METHODS All NF2 patients with Koos IV VS who visited our center, the National Reference Center for NF2 Rare Disease in Pitie-Salpetriere Hospital of Paris, between January 2016 and December 2018 were included. Clinical charts, radiology, operative reports, and audiograms were reviewed. RESULTS Among 54 NF2 patients with Koos IV VS (mean maximum extrameatal diameter: 34 mm; range:17-62 mm), 27 were operated on for 28 VS; 21 were treated with bevacizumab; and six were observed. In the surgical group, VS resections were gross total, near-total, subtotal, or partial in 32%, 25%, 32%, and 11%, respectively; and a good (House-Brackmann grades I-II) facial nerve function was achieved in 81.5% at 1 year. Hearing was preserved in 14%, 78%, and 66% of the surgical (n = 7), bevacizumab (n = 9), and observation (n = 3) patients, respectively. CONCLUSION All therapeutic options, including surgery and/or bevacizumab and occasionally observation, should be proposed to NF2 patients with large VS in the setting of dedicated centers. A decision-making tree is proposed for Koos IV VS management based on tumor evolution, hearing and clinical status of the patient, and contralateral VS size. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 4, case series study, historically controlled study Laryngoscope, 131:E98-E107, 2021.

OBJECTIVES To evaluate the management of sporadic vestibular schwannomas (VS) with a 12-year follow-up. STUDY DESIGN Retrospective study of all VS patients initially treated in 2005 in a tertiary referent center. METHODS Initial decision making for microsurgical resection (MSR) or wait-and-scan (WaS) was according to VS size and hearing; subsequently, MSR or stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) was proposed dependent on VS growth and size, hearing, and patient's age or willingness. RESULTS Two hundred and one sporadic VS were included. The first management apportionment was 120 WaS (61.5%), 72 MSR (37%), three SRS (1.5%), and six others refused MSR and were lost to follow-up (LFU). Within 1 year, 95 (47%) VS were surgically removed; 17 (8.5%) were treated by SRS; and 35 (17.5%) were LFU. The proportions for SRS and LFU were virtually unchanged for the following years, and the proportion under MSR increased slightly within 3 years and then remained stable. Finally, at 12 years, 104 (51.5%) cases had been operated on, 21 (10.5%) treated by SRS, 23 (11.5%) still under WaS, and 53 (26.5%) LFU, which were mainly intracanalicular. The initially and subsequently operated cases presented similar hearing preservation rates and good facial nerve function outcomes. CONCLUSION This longitudinal study of a large number of VS, which were diagnosed over a short period of time and followed for 12 years, provides new information on both the natural history of these benign tumors and individual patient concerns. This study recommends use of the WaS policy for small and mid-sized VS before active therapeutic decision making. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 3 Laryngoscope, 131:E970-E976, 2021.

Middle ear surgery may benefit from robot-based assistance to hold micro-instruments or an endoscope. However, the surgical gesture performed by one hand may perturb surgeons accustomed to two-handed surgery. A robot-based holder may combine the benefits from endoscopic exposure and a two-handed technique. Furthermore, tremor suppression and accurate tool control might help the surgeon during critical surgical steps. The goal of this work was to study the safety of an otological robot-based assistant under clinical conditions in a limited series of patients.The RobOtol system has been used as an endoscope or a micro instrument holder for this series. Eleven cases were operated on with the robot as an endoscope holder for chronic otitis. Twenty-one cases were operated on with the robot as a micro-instrument holder for otosclerosis (9 cases), transtympanic tube placement (2 cases), or cochlear implantation (10 cases).No complications related to the robot manipulation occurred during surgery nor in postoperative. In the chronic otitis group, all perforations were sealed and 3-month postoperative pure-tone average air-bone gap (PTA ABG) was 15 ± 2.6 dB. In the otosclerosis group, 1-month post-op PTA ABG was 10 ± 1 dB. For cochlear implantation cases, a scala tympani insertion, a vestibular scala translocation occurred and a full scala vestibuli insertion was observed in 7, 2 and 1 case, respectively.The RobOtol system has reached the clinical stage. It could be used safely and with accurate control as an endoscope holder or a micro instrument holder in 32 cases.

International audience; Objectives: Telephone use correlates with quality of life, and is one of the most important expectations of cochlear implant candidates. The aim of the present study was to assess the benefit of a progressive intensive 18-session training program, conducted by telephone in cochlear implant recipients.Material and methods: Nine cochlear-implanted adults underwent telerehabilitation focused on telephone use, with before-and-after assessment of: auditory performance, on Lafon monosyllabic words and MBAA sentences in quiet, cocktail-party noise and by phone; telephone use, on ad-hoc surveys and number of calls per week; and quality of life on ERSA and APHAB questionnaires.Results: Before training, monosyllabic word comprehension was poorer by telephone than by direct voice (64±5.7% vs. 26±5.3%; P

Objective The aim of the present study was to investigate the pupillary response to word identification in cochlear implant (CI) patients. Authors hypothesized that when task difficulty (i.e. addition of background noise) increased, pupil dilation markers such as the peak dilation or the latency of the peak dilation, would increase in CI users, as already observed in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired subjects. Methods Pupillometric measures in ten CI patients were combined to standard speech recognition scores used to evaluate CI outcomes, namely speech audiometry in quiet and in noise at +10 dB signal-to-noise ratio. The main outcome measures of pupillometry were mean pupil dilation, maximal pupil dilation, dilation latency and mean dilation during return to baseline or retention interval. Subjective hearing quality was evaluated by means of one self-reported fatigue questionnaire, and the Speech, Spatial and Qualities (SSQ) of Hearing scale. Results All pupil dilation data were transformed to percent change in event-related pupil dilation (ERPD, %). Analyses show that the peak amplitude for both mean pupil dilation and maximal pupil dilation were higher during the speech-in-noise test. Mean peak dilation was measured at 3.47 +/- 2.29 % noise vs. 2.19 +/- 2.46 in quiet and maximal peak value was detected at 9.17 +/- 3.25 % in noise vs. 8.72 +/- 2.93% in quiet. Concerning the questionnaires, the mean pupil dilation during the retention interval was significantly correlated with the spatial subscale score of the SSQ Hearing scale (r(8) = -.84, p =0023), and with the global score (r(8) = -.78, p=0.0018). Conclusions The analysis of pupillometric traces, obtained during speech audiometry in quiet and in noise in CI users, provided interesting information about the different processes engaged in this task. Pupillometric measures could be indicative of listening difficulty, phoneme intelligibility, and were correlated with general hearing experience as evaluated by the Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing scale. These preliminary results show that pupillometry constitutes a promising tool to improve objective quantification of CI performance in clinical settings.

International audience; Objective:Intravestibular schwannomas (IVS) are uncommon tumors in Neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF2) and are mainly associated with multiple internal auditory meatus (IAM) and cerebellopontine angle (CPA) tumors. They usually induce profound hearing loss which can be rehabilitated by cochlear implantation (CI). The aim of this study was to analyze the long-term outcomes of CI during the unpredictable evolution of NF2 disease.Study Design:Retrospective case review.Setting:Tertiary referral center.Patients:Three adults with neurofibromatosis type 2 and intravestibular schwannomas, and who were cochlear implant recipients.Interventions:Periodic radiologic follow-up, tumor resection, and hearing rehabilitation.Main Outcome Measures:Audiological evolution, tumor evolution, surgical outcome, cochlear implant outcome.Results:Three NF2 patients (mean age at diagnosis, 26.3 ± 3.2 yr) were identified with IVS in the period between 2000 and 2017. IVS were first observed by serial MRI and profound hearing loss occurred in this ear after 4 ± 1.5 years of follow-up. IVS were removed via a translabyrinthine approach, and ipsilateral cochlear implantations were simultaneously performed. In two patients, large contralateral CPA tumors had previously been removed without hearing preservation, whereas in the third patient, a small, growing contralateral VS was excised via a retrosigmoid approach 6 months after IVS removal/cochlear implantation with serviceable hearing preservation. In all cases, CI provided good hearing outcomes. In two cases, hearing outcomes were even better for more than 5 years when ipsilateral intracanalicular vestibular schwannomas were removed in either the same or subsequent procedures.Conclusions:Rehabilitation of hearing with CI provides a favorable long-term outcome in patients with NF2-related IVS which could be altered by the occurrence of other intracanalicular and/or CPA NF2-related tumors.

In the last two decades, cochlear implant surgery has evolved into a minimally invasive, hearing preservation surgical technique. The devices used during surgery have benefited from technological advances that have allowed modification and possible improvement of the surgical technique. Robotics has recently gained popularity in otology as an effective tool to overcome the surgeon's limitations such as tremor, drift and accurate force control feedback in laboratory testing. Cochlear implantation benefits from robotic assistance in several steps during the surgical procedure: (i) during the approach to the middle ear by automated mastoidectomy and posterior tympanotomy or through a tunnel from the postauricular skin to the middle ear (i.e. direct cochlear access); (ii) a minimally invasive cochleostomy by a robot-assisted drilling tool; (iii) alignment of the correct insertion axis on the basal cochlear turn; (iv) insertion of the electrode array with a motorized insertion tool. In recent years, the development of bone-attached parallel robots and image-guided surgical robotic systems has allowed the first successful cochlear implantation procedures in patients via a single hole drilled tunnel. Several other robotic systems, new materials, sensing technologies applied to the electrodes, and smart devices have been developed, tested in experimental models and finally some have been used in patients with the aim of reducing trauma in cochleostomy, and permitting slow and more accurate insertion of the electrodes. Despite the promising results in laboratory tests in terms of minimal invasiveness, reduced trauma and better hearing preservation, so far, no clinical benefits on residual hearing preservation or better speech performance have been demonstrated. Before these devices can become the standard approach for cochlear implantation, several points still need to be addressed, primarily cost and duration of the procedure. One can hope that improvement in the cost/benefit ratio will expand the technology to every cochlear implantation procedure. Laboratory research and clinical studies on patients should continue with the aim of making intracochlear implant insertion an atraumatic and reversible gesture for total preservation of the inner ear structure and physiology.

To compare the intracochlear trauma induced by optimized robot-based and manual techniques with a straight electrode array prototype inserted at different lengths.Experimental study.Robot-based otologic surgery laboratory.A prototype array was inserted at different insertion lengths (21 and 25 mm) in 20 temporal bones. The manual insertion was performed with a microforceps. The optimized approach consisted of an optimal axis insertion provided by a robot-based arm controlled by a tracking system, with a constant speed of insertion (0.25 mm/s) achieved by a motorized insertion tool. The electrode position was determined at the level of each electrode by stereomicroscopic cochlea section analysis.A higher number of electrodes correctly located in the scala tympani was associated with the optimized approach ( P = .03, 2-way analysis of variance). Regardless of the insertion technique used, the array inserted at 25 mm allowed complete insertion of the active stimulating portion of the array in all cases. Insertion depth was greater when the array was inserted to 25 mm versus 21 mm ( P.001, 2-way analysis of variance). The optimized insertion was associated with less trauma than that from manual insertion regardless the length of the inserted array ( P = .04, 2-way analysis of variance).Compared with a manual insertion, intracochlear trauma could be reduced with array insertion performed on an optimal axis by using motorized insertion and by applying a constant insertion speed.