Search

For many genome-wide association studies, imputing genotypes from a haplotype reference panel is a necessary step. Over the past 15 years, reference panels have become larger and more diverse, leading to improvements in imputation accuracy. However, the latest generation of reference panels is subject to restrictions on data sharing due to concerns about privacy, limiting their usefulness for genotype imputation. In this context, we propose RESHAPE, a method that employs a recombination Poisson process on a reference panel to simulate the genomes of hypothetical descendants after multiple generations. This data transformation helps to protect against re-identification threats and preserves important data attributes, such as linkage disequilibrium (LD) patterns and, to some degree, Identity-By-Descent (IBD) sharing, allowing for genotype imputation. Our experiments on gold standard datasets show that simulated descendants up to eight generations can serve as reference panels without significantly reducing genotype imputation accuracy. We suggest that this specific type of data anonymization could be used to generate synthetic reference panels available under less restrictive data sharing policies.

Summary: Mapping ancient DNA to a reference genome is challenging as it involves numerous steps, is time-consuming and has to be repeated within a study to assess the quality of extracts and libraries; as a result, the mapping needs to be automatized to handle large amounts of data in a reproducible way. We present mapache, a flexible, robust, and scalable pipeline to map, quantify and impute ancient and present-day DNA in a reproducible way. Mapache is implemented in the workflow manager Snakemake and is optimized for low-space consumption, allowing to efficiently (re)map large data sets such as reference panels and multiple extracts and libraries., Availability: Mapache is freely available on GitHub (https://github.com/sneuensc/mapache). Supplementary information: An extensive manual is provided at https://github.com/sneuensc/mapache/wiki

Genotype-phenotype association tests are typically adjusted for population stratification using principal components that are estimated genome-wide. This lacks resolution when analysing populations with fine structure and/or individuals with fine levels of admixture. This can affect power and precision, and is a particularly relevant consideration when control individuals are recruited using geographic selection criteria. Such is the case in France where we have recently created reference panels of individuals anchored to different geographic regions. To make correct comparisons against case groups, who would likely be gathered from large urban areas, new methods are needed.We present SURFBAT (a SURrogate Family Based Association Test) which performs an approximation of the transmission-disequilibrium test. Our method hinges on the application of genotype imputation algorithms to match similar haplotypes between the case and control groups. This permits us to approximate local ancestry informed posterior probabilities of un-transmitted parental alleles of each case individual. SURFBAT provides an association test that is inherently robust to fine-scale population stratification and opens up the possibility of efficiently using large imputation reference panels as control groups for association testing. The method is suitable when the control panel spans the local ancestry spectrum of the case-group population and each control has similar paternal and maternal ancestries. This is the case for our reference panels where individuals have their four grand-parents born in the same geographic area. In contrast to other methods for association testing that incorporate local-ancestry inference, SURFBAT does not require a set of ancestry groups to be defined, nor for local ancestry to be explicitly estimated.We demonstrate the interest of our tool on simulated datasets created from the 1000 Genomes project and the FranceGenRef project, as well as on a real-data example for a group of case individuals affected by Brugada syndrome.

Recent work highlights the advantages of low-coverage whole genome sequencing (lcWGS), followed by genotype imputation, as a cost-effective genotyping technology for statistical and population genetics. The release of whole genome sequencing data for 150,119 UK Biobank (UKB) samples represents an unprecedented opportunity to impute lcWGS with high accuracy. However, despite recent progress1,2, current methods struggle to cope with the growing numbers of samples and markers in modern reference panels, resulting in unsustainable computational costs. For instance, the imputation cost for a single genome is 1.11£ using GLIMPSE v1.1.1 (GLIMPSE1) on the UKB research analysis platform (RAP) and rises to 242.8£ using QUILT v1.0.4. To overcome this computational burden, we introduce GLIMPSE v2.0.0 (GLIMPSE2), a major improvement of GLIMPSE, that scales sublinearly in both the number of samples and markers. GLIMPSE2 imputes a low-coverage genome from the UKB reference panel for only 0.08£ in compute cost while retaining high accuracy for both ancient and modern genomes, particularly at rare variants (MAF < 0.1%) and for very low-coverage samples (0.1x-0.5x).

The UK Biobank performed whole-genome sequencing (WGS) and whole-exome sequencing (WES) across hundreds of thousands of individuals, allowing researchers to study the effects of both common and rare variants. Haplotype phasing distinguishes the two inherited copies of each chromosome into haplotypes and unlocks novel analyses at the haplotype level. In this work, we describe a new phasing method, SHAPEIT5, that accurately and rapidly phases large sequencing datasets and illustrates its key features on the UK Biobank WGS and WES data. First, we show that it phases rare variants with high accuracy. For instance, variants found in 1 sample out of 100,000 in the WES data are phased with accuracy above 95%. Second, we show that it can phase singletons, although with moderate accuracy, thereby making their inclusion in downstream analyses possible. Third, we show that the use of UK Biobank as a reference panel increases the accuracy of genotype imputation, an increase that is more pronounced when phased with SHAPEIT5 compared to other methods. Finally, we screen the phased WES data for loss-of-functon(LoF) compound heterozygous (CH) events and identify 549 genes in which both gene copies are found knocked out. This list of genes complements current knowledge of gene essentiality in the human genome. We provide SHAPEIT5 in an open-source format, providing researchers with the means to leverage haplotype information in genetic studies.

Non-coding regulatory elements such as enhancers are key in controlling the cell type-specificity and spatio-temporal expression of genes. To drive stable and precise gene transcription that is robust to genetic variation and environmental stress, genes are often targeted by multiple enhancers with redundant action. However, it is unknown whether enhancers targeting the same gene display simultaneous activity or whether some enhancer combinations are more often co-active than others. Here, we take advantage of the recent developments in single cell technology that permit assessing chromatin status (scATAC-seq) and gene expression (scRNA-seq) in the same single cells to link gene expression to the activity of multiple enhancers. Measuring activity patterns across 24,844 human lymphoblastoid single cells, we found that the majority of enhancers associated with the same gene display significant correlation in their chromatin profiles. For 6944 expressed genes associated with enhancers, we identified 89,885 significant enhancer-enhancer associations between nearby enhancers. We found that associated enhancers share similar transcription factor binding profiles and that gene essentiality is linked with higher enhancer co-activity. Our extensive enhancer co-activity maps can be used to pinpoint combinations of enhancers relevant in gene expression regulation and allow us to better predict the effect of genetic variation falling in non-coding regions.

Studying the interplay between genetic variation, epigenetic changes and regulation of gene expression in immune cells is important to understand the modification of cellular states in various conditions, including immune diseases. Here, we built cis maps of regulatory regions with coordinated activity – Cis Regulatory Domains (CRDs) – in neutrophils, monocytes and T cells. For this, we leveraged (i) whole-genome sequencing (WGS), (ii) chromatin immunoprecipitation sequencing (ChIP-seq), (iii) DNA methylation (450k arrays), and (iv) transcriptional profiles (RNA-seq) from the BLUEPRINT consortium, for up to 200 individuals. Our study uncovers 9287, 7666 and 5480 histone CRDs (hCRDs) and 6053, 6112, 5701 methyl CRDs (mCRDs) in monocytes, neutrophils and T-cells, respectively. We discovered 15294 hCRD-gene and 6185 mCRD-gene associations (5% FDR). Only 33% of hCRD-gene associations and 37% of mCRD-gene associations were shared between cell-types, revealing the dynamic nature of regulatory interactions and how similarly located regulatory regions modulate the activity of different genes on different cell types. We mapped Quantitative Trait Loci associated with CRD activity (CRD-QTLs) and found that 89% and 70% of these hCRDs and mCRDs are under genetic control highlighting the importance of genetic variation to study the coordination of cellular regulatory programs. We found CRD-QTLs to be enriched in cell-type-specific transcription factor binding sites, such as SPI1, STAT3, RFX1, SOX4, ATF3 for neutrophils and monocytes and TCF4 and BCL11A for T-cells, in line ​​with the Human protein Atlas. We integrated PCHi-C data, which showed that most significant associations discovered within gene-CRD associations and co-expressed genes associated with the same CRD, involving large genomic distances, tend to happen between genomic regions in close spatial proximity. Finally, we mapped trans regulatory associations between CRDs, which enabled the discovery of 207 trans-eQTLs across cell types. Overlapping our hits with trans eQTLs from eQTLGen Consortium meta-analysis in whole blood revealed 81 trans-eQTLs shared between the two studies. Overall, we show that mapping functional regulatory units using population genomics data allows discovering important mechanisms in the regulation of gene expression in immune cells and gain a greater understanding of cell-type specific regulatory mechanisms of immunity.

Due to postmortem DNA degradation, most ancient genomes sequenced to date have low depth of coverage, preventing the true underlying genotypes from being recovered. Genotype imputation has been put forward to improve genotyping accuracy for low-coverage genomes. However, it is unknown to what extent imputation of ancient genomes produces accurate genotypes and whether imputation introduces bias to downstream analyses. To address these questions, we downsampled 43 ancient genomes, 42 of which are high-coverage (above 10x) and three constitute a trio (mother, father and son), from different times and continents to simulate data with coverage in the range of 0.1x-2.0x and imputed these using state-of-the-art methods and reference panels. We assessed imputation accuracy across ancestries and depths of coverage. We found that ancient and modern DNA imputation accuracies were comparable. We imputed most of the 42 high-coverage genomes downsampled to 1x with low error rates (below 5%) and estimated higher error rates for African genomes, which are underrepresented in the reference panel. We used the ancient trio data to validate imputation and phasing results using an orthogonal approach based on Mendel’s rules of inheritance. This resulted in imputation and switch error rates of 1.9% and 2.0%, respectively, for 1x genomes. We further compared the results of downstream analyses between imputed and high-coverage genomes, notably principal component analysis (PCA), genetic clustering, and runs of homozygosity (ROH). For these three approaches, we observed similar results between imputed and high-coverage genomes using depths of coverage of at least 0.5x, except for African genomes, for which the decreased imputation accuracy impacted ROH estimates. Altogether, these results suggest that, for most populations and depths of coverage as low as 0.5x, imputation is a reliable method with potential to expand and improve ancient DNA studies.

Low-coverage whole-genome sequencing followed by imputation has been proposed as a cost-effective genotyping approach for disease and population genetics studies. However, its competitiveness against SNP arrays is undermined because current imputation methods are computationally expensive and unable to leverage large reference panels. Here, we describe a method, GLIMPSE, for phasing and imputation of low-coverage sequencing datasets from modern reference panels. We demonstrate its remarkable performance across different coverages and human populations. GLIMPSE achieves imputation of a genome for less than US$1 in computational cost, considerably outperforming other methods and improving imputation accuracy over the full allele frequency range. As a proof of concept, we show that 1× coverage enables effective gene expression association studies and outperforms dense SNP arrays in rare variant burden tests. Overall, this study illustrates the promising potential of low-coverage imputation and suggests a paradigm shift in the design of future genomic studies. GLIMPSE is a new method for haplotype phasing and genotype imputation of low-coverage sequencing datasets from large reference panels. GLIMPSE shows remarkable performance across different coverages and human populations.

Motivation Generation of genotype data has been growing exponentially over the last decade. With the large size of recent datasets comes a storage and computational burden with ever increasing costs. To reduce this burden, we propose XSI, a file format with reduced storage footprint that also allows computation on the compressed data and we show how this can improve future analyses. Results We show that xSqueezeIt (XSI) allows for a file size reduction of 4-20× compared with compressed BCF and demonstrate its potential for ‘compressive genomics’ on the UK Biobank whole-genome sequencing genotypes with 8× faster loading times, 5× faster run of homozygozity computation, 30× faster dot products computation and 280× faster allele counts. Availability and implementation The XSI file format specifications, API and command line tool are released under open-source (MIT) license and are available at https://github.com/rwk-unil/xSqueezeIt Supplementary information Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

The combined analysis of haplotype panels with phenotype clinical cohorts is a common approach to explore the genetic architecture of human diseases. However, genetic studies are mainly based on single nucleotide variants (SNVs) and small insertions and deletions (indels). Here, we contribute to fill this gap by generating a dense haplotype map focused on the identification, characterization, and phasing of structural variants (SVs). By integrating multiple variant identification methods and Logistic Regression Models (LRMs), we present a catalogue of 35 431 441 variants, including 89 178 SVs (≥50 bp), 30 325 064 SNVs and 5 017 199 indels, across 785 Illumina high coverage (30x) whole-genomes from the Iberian GCAT Cohort, containing a median of 3.52M SNVs, 606 336 indels and 6393 SVs per individual. The haplotype panel is able to impute up to 14 360 728 SNVs/indels and 23 179 SVs, showing a 2.7-fold increase for SVs compared with available genetic variation panels. The value of this panel for SVs analysis is shown through an imputed rare Alu element located in a new locus associated with Mononeuritis of lower limb, a rare neuromuscular disease. This study represents the first deep characterization of genetic variation within the Iberian population and the first operational haplotype panel to systematically include the SVs into genome-wide genetic studies. GCAT|Genomes for Life, a cohort study of the Genomes of Catalonia, Fundació Institut Germans Trias i Pujol (IGTP); IGTP is part of the CERCA Program/Generalitat de Catalunya; GCAT is supported by Acción de Dinamización del ISCIII-MINECO; Ministry of Health of the Generalitat of Catalunya [ADE 10/00026]; Agència de Gestió d’Ajuts Universitaris i de Recerca (AGAUR) [2017-SGR 529]; B.C. is supported by national grants [PI18/01512]; X.F. is supported by VEIS project [001-P-001647] (co-funded by European Regional Development Fund (ERDF), ‘A way to build Europe’); a full list of the investigators who contributed to the generation of the GCAT data is available from www.genomesforlife.com/; Severo Ochoa Program, awarded by the Spanish Government [SEV-2011-00067 and SEV2015-0493]; Spanish Ministry of Science [TIN2015-65316-P]; Innovation and by the Generalitat de Catalunya [2014-SGR-1051 to D.T.]; Agencia Estatal de Investigación (AEI, Spain) [BFU2016-77244-R and PID2019-107836RB-I00]; European Regional Development Fund (FEDER, EU) (to M.C.); Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation [FPI BES-2016-0077344 to J.V.M.]; C.S. received funding from the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under the Marie Skłodowska-Curie grant agreement [H2020-MSCA-COFUND-2016-754433]; this study made use of data generated by the UK10K Consortium from UK10K COHORT IMPUTATION [EGAS00001000713]; formal agreement with the Barcelona Supercomputing Center (BSC); this study made use of data generated by the Genome of the Netherlands’ project, which is funded by the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research [184021007], allowing us to use the GoNL reference panel containing SVs, upon request (GoNL Data Access request 2019203); this study also used data generated by the Haplotype Reference Consortium (HRC) accessed through the European Genome-phenome Archive with the accession numbers EGAD00001002729; formal agreement of the Barcelona Supercomputing Center (BSC) with WTSI; this study made use of data generated by the 1000 Genomes (1000G), accessed through the FTP portal (http://ftp.1000genomes.ebi.ac.uk/vol1/ftp/release/20130502/); this study used the GeneHancer-for-AnnotSV dump for GeneCards Suite Version 4.14, through a formal agreement between the BSC and the Weizmann Institute of Science. Funding for open access charge: GCAT|Genomes for Life, a cohort study of the Genomes of Catalonia, Fundació Institut Germans Trias i Pujol (IGTP); IGTP is part of the CERCA Program/Generalitat de Catalunya; GCAT is supported by Acción de Dinamización del ISCIII-MINECO; Ministry of Health of the Generalitat of Catalunya [ADE 10/00026]; Agència de Gestió d’Ajuts Universitaris i de Recerca (AGAUR) [2017-SGR 529]; B.C. is supported by national grants [PI18/01512]; X.F. is supported by VEIS project [001-P-001647] (co-funded by European Regional Development Fund (ERDF), ‘A way to build Europe’); a full list of the investigators who contributed to the generation of the GCAT data is available from www.genomesforlife.com/; Severo Ochoa Program, awarded by the Spanish Government [SEV-2011-00067 and SEV2015-0493]; Spanish Ministry of Science [TIN2015-65316-P]; Innovation and by the Generalitat de Catalunya [2014-SGR-1051 to D.T.]; [Agencia Estatal de Investigación (AEI, Spain) [BFU2016-77244-R and PID2019-107836RB-I00]; European Regional Development Fund (FEDER, EU) (to M.C.); Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation [FPI BES-2016-0077344 to J.V.M.]; C.S. received funding from the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under the Marie Skłodowska-Curie grant agreement [H2020-MSCA-COFUND-2016-754433]; this study made use of data generated by the UK10K Consortium from UK10K COHORT IMPUTATION [EGAS00001000713]; formal agreement with the Barcelona Supercomputing Center (BSC); this study made use of data generated by the Genome of the Netherlands’ project, which is funded by the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research [184021007], allowing us to use the GoNL reference panel containing SVs, upon request (GoNL Data Access request 2019203); this study also used data generated by the Haplotype Reference Consortium (HRC) accessed through the European Genome-phenome Archive with the accession numbers EGAD00001002729; formal agreement of the Barcelona Supercomputing Center (BSC) with WTSI; this study made use of data generated by the 1000 Genomes (1000G), accessed through the FTP portal (http://ftp.1000genomes.ebi.ac.uk/vol1/ftp/release/20130502/); this study used the GeneHancer-for-AnnotSV dump for GeneCards Suite Version 4.14, through a formal agreement between the BSC and The Weizmann Institute of Science. "Article signat per 21 autors/es: Jordi Valls-Margarit, Iván Galván-Femenía, Daniel Matías-Sánchez, Natalia Blay, Montserrat Puiggròs, Anna Carreras, Cecilia Salvoro, Beatriz Cortés, Ramon Amela, Xavier Farre, Jon Lerga-Jaso, Marta Puig, Jose Francisco Sánchez-Herrero, Victor Moreno, Manuel Perucho, Lauro Sumoy, Lluís Armengol, Olivier Delaneau, Mario Cáceres, Rafael de Cid, David Torrents"

Most human genes are co-expressed with a nearby gene. Previous studies have revealed this local gene co-expression to be widespread across chromosomes and across dozens of tissues. Yet, so far these studies used bulk RNA-seq, averaging gene expression measurements across millions of cells, thus being unclear if this co-expression stems from transcription events in single cells. Here, we leverage single cell datasets in85 individuals to identify gene co-expression across cells, unbiased by cell-type heterogeneity and benefiting from the co-occurrence of transcription events in single cells. We discover3800 co-expressed gene pairs in two human cell types, induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) and lymphoblastoid cell lines (LCLs) and (i) compare single cell to bulk RNA-seq in identifying local gene co-expression, (ii) show that many co-expressed genes - but not the majority - are composed of functionally related genes and (iii) using proteomics data, provide evidence that their co-expression is maintained up to the protein level. Finally, using single cell RNA-sequencing (scRNA-seq) and single cell ATAC-sequencing (scATAC-seq) data for the same single cells, we identify gene-enhancer associations and reveal that95% of co-expressed gene pairs share regulatory elements. These results elucidate the potential reasons for co-expression in single cell gene regulatory networks and warrant a deeper study of shared regulatory elements, in view of explaining disease comorbidity due to affecting several genes. Our in-depth view of local gene co-expression and regulatory element co-activity advances our understanding of the shared regulatory architecture between genes.

Identical genetic variations can have different phenotypic effects depending on their parent of origin (PofO). Yet, studies focussing on PofO effects have been largely limited in terms of sample size due to the need of parental genomes or known genealogies. Here, we used a novel probabilistic approach to infer PofO of individual alleles in the UK Biobank that does not require parental genomes nor prior knowledge of genealogy. Our model uses Identity-By-Descent (IBD) sharing with second- and third-degree relatives to assign alleles to parental groups and leverages chromosome X data in males to distinguish maternal from paternal groups. When combined with robust haplotype inference and haploid imputation, this allowed us to infer the PofO at 5.4 million variants genome-wide for 26,393 UK Biobank individuals. We used this large dataset to systematically screen 59 biomarkers and 38 anthropomorphic phenotypes for PofO effects and discovered 101 significant associations, demonstrating that this type of effects is widespread. Notably, we retrieved well known PofO effects, such as the MEG3/DLK1 locus on platelet count, and we discovered many new ones often at loci outside currently known imprinted regions and previously thought to harbour additive associations, implying that the underlying molecular mechanisms may be more complex than expected.

The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has differentially impacted populations across race and ethnicity. A multi-omic approach represents a powerful tool to examine risk across multi-ancestry genomes. We leverage a pandemic tracking strategy in which we sequence viral and host genomes and transcriptomes from nasopharyngeal swabs of 1049 individuals (736 SARS-CoV-2 positive and 313 SARS-CoV-2 negative) and integrate them with digital phenotypes from electronic health records from a diverse catchment area in Northern California. Genome-wide association disaggregated by admixture mapping reveals novel COVID-19-severity-associated regions containing previously reported markers of neurologic, pulmonary and viral disease susceptibility. Phylodynamic tracking of consensus viral genomes reveals no association with disease severity or inferred ancestry. Summary data from multiomic investigation reveals metagenomic and HLA associations with severe COVID-19. The wealth of data available from residual nasopharyngeal swabs in combination with clinical data abstracted automatically at scale highlights a powerful strategy for pandemic tracking, and reveals distinct epidemiologic, genetic, and biological associations for those at the highest risk.

The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has differentially impacted populations of varied race, ethnicity and socioeconomic status. Admixture mapping and local ancestry inference represent powerful tools to examine genetic risk within multi-ancestry genomes independent of these confounding social constructs. Here, we leverage a pandemic tracking strategy in which we sequence viral and host genomes and transcriptomes from 1,327 nasopharyngeal swab residuals and integrate them with digital phenotypes from electronic health records. We demonstrate over-representation of individuals possessing Oceanian and Indigenous American ancestry in SARS-CoV-2 positive populations. Genome-wide-association disaggregated by admixture mapping reveals regions of chromosomes 5 and 14 associated with COVID19 severity within African and Oceanic local ancestries, respectively, independent of overall ancestry fraction. Phylodynamic tracking of consensus viral genomes reveals no association with disease severity or inferred ancestry. We further present summary data from a multi-omic investigation of human-leukocyte-antigen (HLA) typing, nasopharyngeal microbiome and human transcriptomics that reveal metagenomic and HLA associations with severe COVID19 infection. This work demonstrates the power of multi-omic pandemic tracking and genomic analyses to reveal distinct epidemiologic, genetic and biological associations for those at the highest risk.

The combined analysis of haplotype panels with phenotype clinical cohorts is a common approach to explore the genetic architecture of human diseases. However, genetic studies are mainly based on single nucleotide variants (SNVs) and small insertions and deletions (indels). Here, we contribute to fill this gap by generating a dense haplotype map focused on the identification, characterization and phasing of structural variants (SVs). By integrating multiple variant identification methods and Logistic Regression models, we present a catalogue of 35,431,441 variants, including 89,178 SVs (≥50bp), 30,325,064 SNVs and 5,017,199 indels, across 785 Illumina high coverage (30X) whole-genomes from the Iberian GCAT Cohort, containing 3.52M SNVs, 606,336 indels and 6,393 SVs in median per individual. The haplotype panel is able to impute up to 14,360,728 SNVs/indels and 23,179 SVs, showing a 2.7-fold increase for SVs compared with available genetic variation panels. The value of this panel for SVs analysis is shown through an imputed rare Alu element located in a new locus associated with mononeuritis of lower limb, a rare neuromuscular disease. This study represents the first deep characterization of genetic variation within the Iberian population and the first operational haplotype panel to systematically include the SVs into genome-wide genetic studies.

Comparing transcript levels between healthy and diseased individuals allows the identification of differentially expressed genes, which may be causes, consequences or mere correlates of the disease under scrutiny. We propose a method to decompose the observational correlation between gene expression and phenotypes driven by confounders, forward- and reverse causal effects. The bi-directional causal effects between gene expression and complex traits are obtained by Mendelian Randomization integrating summary-level data from GWAS and whole-blood eQTLs. Applying this approach to complex traits reveals that forward effects have negligible contribution. For example, BMI- and triglycerides-gene expression correlation coefficients robustly correlate with trait-to-expression causal effects (rBMI = 0.11, PBMI = 2.0 × 10−51 and rTG = 0.13, PTG = 1.1 × 10−68), but not detectably with expression-to-trait effects. Our results demonstrate that studies comparing the transcriptome of diseased and healthy subjects are more prone to reveal disease-induced gene expression changes rather than disease causing ones., Identification of gene expression changes between healthy and diseased individuals can reveal mechanistic insights and biomarkers. Here, the authors propose a bi-directional transcriptome-wide Mendelian Randomization approach to assess causal effects between gene expression and complex traits.

Individuals experiencing socioeconomic disadvantage in childhood have a higher rate of inflammation-related diseases decades later. Little is known about the mechanisms linking early life experiences to the functioning of the immune system in adulthood. To address this, we explore the relationship across social-to-biological layers of early life social exposures on levels of adulthood inflammation and the mediating role of gene regulatory mechanisms, epigenetic and transcriptomic profiling from blood, in 2,329 individuals from two European cohort studies. Consistently across both studies, we find transcriptional activity explains a substantive proportion (78% and 26%) of the estimated effect of early life disadvantaged social exposures on levels of adulthood inflammation. Furthermore, we show that mechanisms other than cis DNA methylation may regulate those transcriptional fingerprints. These results further our understanding of social-to-biological transitions by pinpointing the role of gene regulation that cannot fully be explained by differential cis DNA methylation.

Nearby genes are often expressed as a group. Yet, the prevalence, molecular mechanisms and genetic control of local gene co-expression are far from being understood. Here, by leveraging gene expression measurements across 49 human tissues and hundreds of individuals, we find that local gene co-expression occurs in 13% to 53% of genes per tissue. By integrating various molecular assays (e.g. ChIP-seq and Hi-C), we estimate the ability of several mechanisms, such as enhancer-gene interactions, in distinguishing gene pairs that are co-expressed from those that are not. Notably, we identify 32,636 expression quantitative trait loci (eQTLs) which associate with co-expressed gene pairs and often overlap enhancer regions. Due to affecting several genes, these eQTLs are more often associated with multiple human traits than other eQTLs. Our study paves the way to comprehend trait pleiotropy and functional interpretation of QTL and GWAS findings. All local gene co-expression identified here is available through a public database (https://glcoex.unil.ch/)., Local gene co-expression is found throughout the genome, but systematic analysis of these co-expressed genes is needed. Here, the authors identify local co-expressed genes in 49 tissues and characterize the genetic variants which may affect their expression and contribute to disease.

Summary The Cycladic, the Minoan, and the Helladic (Mycenaean) cultures define the Bronze Age (BA) of Greece. Urbanism, complex social structures, craft and agricultural specialization, and the earliest forms of writing characterize this iconic period. We sequenced six Early to Middle BA whole genomes, along with 11 mitochondrial genomes, sampled from the three BA cultures of the Aegean Sea. The Early BA (EBA) genomes are homogeneous and derive most of their ancestry from Neolithic Aegeans, contrary to earlier hypotheses that the Neolithic-EBA cultural transition was due to massive population turnover. EBA Aegeans were shaped by relatively small-scale migration from East of the Aegean, as evidenced by the Caucasus-related ancestry also detected in Anatolians. In contrast, Middle BA (MBA) individuals of northern Greece differ from EBA populations in showing ∼50% Pontic-Caspian Steppe-related ancestry, dated at ca. 2,600-2,000 BCE. Such gene flow events during the MBA contributed toward shaping present-day Greek genomes., Graphical abstract, Highlights • Bronze Age (BA) Helladic, Cycladic, and Minoan genomes from the Aegean were sequenced • 3,000 BCE Aegeans are homogeneous and derive ancestry mainly from Neolithic farmers • Neolithic Caucasus-like and BA Pontic-Caspian Steppe-like gene flow shaped the Aegean • Present-day Greeks are genetically similar to 2,000 BCE Aegeans from Northern Greece, The genomic analysis of ancient individuals from important archaeological sites across Aegean cultures suggests that the Aegean during the Bronze Age was at a genomic crossroads, and separate migration waves coincide with cultural shifts that had important impacts on Bronze Age cultures and the formation of the modern Greek population.

Genotype imputation is the process of predicting unobserved genotypes in a sample of individuals using a reference panel of haplotypes. In the last 10 years reference panels have increased in size by more than 100 fold. Increasing reference panel size improves accuracy of markers with low minor allele frequencies but poses ever increasing computational challenges for imputation methods. Here we present IMPUTE5, a genotype imputation method that can scale to reference panels with millions of samples. This method continues to refine the observation made in the IMPUTE2 method, that accuracy is optimized via use of a custom subset of haplotypes when imputing each individual. It achieves fast, accurate, and memory-efficient imputation by selecting haplotypes using the Positional Burrows Wheeler Transform (PBWT). By using the PBWT data structure at genotyped markers, IMPUTE5 identifies locally best matching haplotypes and long identical by state segments. The method then uses the selected haplotypes as conditioning states within the IMPUTE model. Using the HRC reference panel, which has ∼65,000 haplotypes, we show that IMPUTE5 is up to 30x faster than MINIMAC4 and up to 3x faster than BEAGLE5.1, and uses less memory than both these methods. Using simulated reference panels we show that IMPUTE5 scales sub-linearly with reference panel size. For example, keeping the number of imputed markers constant, increasing the reference panel size from 10,000 to 1 million haplotypes requires less than twice the computation time. As the reference panel increases in size IMPUTE5 is able to utilize a smaller number of reference haplotypes, thus reducing computational cost., Author summary Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) typically use microarray technology to measure genotypes at several hundred thousand positions in the genome. However reference panels of genetic variation consist of haplotype data at >100 fold more positions in the genome. Genotype imputation makes genotype predictions at all the reference panel sites using the GWAS data. Reference panels are continuing to grow in size and this improves accuracy of the predictions, however methods need to be able to scale this increased size. We have developed a new version of the popular IMPUTE software than can handle reference panels with millions of haplotypes, and has better performance than other published approaches. A notable property of the new method is that it scales sub-linearly with reference panel size. Keeping the number of imputed markers constant, a 100 fold increase in reference panel size requires less than twice the computation time.

During COVID19 and other viral pandemics, rapid generation of host and pathogen genomic data is critical to tracking infection and informing therapies. There is an urgent need for efficient approaches to this data generation at scale. We have developed a scalable, high throughput approach to generate high fidelity low pass whole genome and HLA sequencing, viral genomes, and representation of human transcriptome from single nasopharyngeal swabs of COVID19 patients.

Low-coverage whole-genome sequencing followed by imputation has been proposed as a cost-effective genotyping approach for disease and population genetics studies. However, its competitiveness against SNP arrays is undermined because current imputation methods are computationally expensive and unable to leverage large reference panels. Here, we describe a method, GLIMPSE, for phasing and imputation of low-coverage sequencing datasets from modern reference panels. We demonstrate its remarkable performance across different coverages and human populations. GLIMPSE achieves imputation of a genome for less than US$1 in computational cost, considerably outperforming other methods and improving imputation accuracy over the full allele frequency range. As a proof of concept, we show that 1× coverage enables effective gene expression association studies and outperforms dense SNP arrays in rare variant burden tests. Overall, this study illustrates the promising potential of low-coverage imputation and suggests a paradigm shift in the design of future genomic studies.

Low-coverage whole genome sequencing followed by imputation has been proposed as a cost-effective genotyping approach for disease and population genetics studies. However, its competitiveness against SNP arrays is undermined as current imputation methods are computationally expensive and unable to leverage large reference panels.Here, we describe a method, GLIMPSE, for phasing and imputation of low-coverage sequencing datasets from modern reference panels. We demonstrate its remarkable performance across different coverages and human populations. It achieves imputation of a full genome for less than $1, outperforming existing methods by orders of magnitude, with an increased accuracy of more than 20% at rare variants. We also show that 1x coverage enables effective association studies and is better suited than dense SNP arrays to access the impact of rare variations. Overall, this study demonstrates the promising potential of low-coverage imputation and suggests a paradigm shift in the design of future genomic studies.

MC3 Working Group: Rehan Akbani21, Pavana Anur22, Matthew H. Bailey1,2,3, Alex Buchanan9, Kami Chiotti9, Kyle Covington12,23, Allison Creason9, Li Ding1,2,3,20, Kyle Ellrott9, Yu Fan21, Steven Foltz1,2, Gad Getz8,14,15,16, Walker Hale12, David Haussler24,25, Julian M. Hess8,26, Carolyn M. Hutter27, Cyriac Kandoth28, Katayoon Kasaian29,30, Melpomeni Kasapi27, Dave Larson1 , Ignaty Leshchiner8, John Letaw31, Singer Ma32, Michael D. McLellan1,3,20, Yifei Men32, Gordon B. Mills33,34, Beifang Niu35, Myron Peto22, Amie Radenbaugh24, Sheila M. Reynolds36, Gordon Saksena8, Heidi Sofia27, Chip Stewart8, Adam J. Struck31, Joshua M. Stuart24,37, Wenyi Wang21, John N. Weinstein38, David A. Wheeler12,13, Christopher K. Wong24,39, Liu Xi12 & Kai Ye40,41 21Department of Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA. 22Molecular and Medical Genetics, OHSU Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR 97239, USA. 23Castle Biosciences Inc, Friendswood, TX 77546, USA. 24UC Santa Cruz Genomics Institute, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA 95064, USA. 25Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA 95064, USA. 26Massachusetts General Hospital Center for Cancer Research, Charlestown, MA 02114, USA. 27National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20894, USA. 28Marie-Josée and Henry R. Kravis Center for Molecular Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA. 29Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, ON M5G 0A3, Canada. 30Canada’s Michael Smith Genome Sciences Centre, BC Cancer, Vancouver, BC V5Z 4S6, Canada. 31Computational Biology Program, School of Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR 97239, USA. 32DNAnexus Inc, Mountain View, CA 94040, USA. 33Department of Systems Biology, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA. 34Precision Oncology, OHSU Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR 97239, USA. 35Computer Network Information Center, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China. 36Institute for Systems Biology, Seattle, WA 98109, USA. 37Department of Biomolecular Engineering, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA 95064, USA. 38Department of Bioinformatics and Computational Biology and Department of Systems Biology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA. 39Biomolecular Engineering Department, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA 95064, USA. 40School of Elect, PCAWG novel somatic mutation calling methods working group: Matthew H. Bailey1,2,3, Beifang Niu35, Matthias Bieg42,43, Paul C. Boutros6,44,45,46, Ivo Buchhalter43,47,48, Adam P. Butler49, Ken Chen50, Zechen Chong51, Li Ding1,2,3,20, Oliver Drechsel52,53, Lewis Jonathan Dursi6,7, Roland Eils47,48,54,55, Kyle Ellrott9, Shadrielle M. G. Espiritu6, Yu Fan21, Robert S. Fulton1,3,20, Shengjie Gao56, Josep L. l. Gelpi57,58, Mark B. Gerstein5,18,19, Gad Getz8,14,15,16, Santiago Gonzalez59,60, Ivo G. Gut52,61, Faraz Hach62,63, Michael C. Heinold47,48, Julian M. Hess8,26, Jonathan Hinton49, Taobo Hu64, Vincent Huang6, Yi Huang65,66, Barbara Hutter43,67,68, David R. Jones49, Jongsun Jung69, Natalie Jäger47, Hyung-Lae Kim70, Kortine Kleinheinz47,48, Sushant Kumar5,19, Yogesh Kumar64, Christopher M. Lalansingh6, Ignaty Leshchiner8, Ivica Letunic71, Dimitri Livitz8, Eric Z. Ma64, Yosef E. Maruvka8,26,72, R. Jay Mashl1,2, Michael D. McLellan1,3,20, Andrew Menzies49, Ana Milovanovic57, Morten Muhlig Nielsen73, Stephan Ossowski52,53,74, Nagarajan Paramasivam43,47, Jakob Skou Pedersen73,75, Marc D. Perry76,77, Montserrat Puiggròs57, Keiran M. Raine49, Esther Rheinbay8,14,72, Romina Royo57, S. Cenk Sahinalp62,78,79, Gordon Saksena8, Iman Sarrafi62,78, Matthias Schlesner47,80, Jared T. Simpson6,17, Lucy Stebbings49, Chip Stewart8, Miranda D. Stobbe52,61, Jon W. Teague49, Grace Tiao8, David Torrents57,81, Jeremiah A. Wala8,14,82, Jiayin Wang1,40,66, Wenyi Wang21, Sebastian M. Waszak60, Joachim Weischenfeldt60,83,84, Michael C. Wendl1,10,11, Johannes Werner47,85, Zhenggang Wu64, Hong Xue64, Sergei Yakneen60, Takafumi N. Yamaguchi6, Kai Ye40,41, Venkata D. Yellapantula20,86, Christina K. Yung76 & Junjun Zhang76, PCAWG Consortium: Lauri A. Aaltonen87, Federico Abascal49, Adam Abeshouse88, Hiroyuki Aburatani89, David J. Adams49, Nishant Agrawal90, Keun Soo Ahn91, Sung-Min Ahn92, Hiroshi Aikata93, Rehan Akbani21, Kadir C. Akdemir50, Hikmat Al-Ahmadie88, Sultan T. Al-Sedairy94, Fatima Al-Shahrour95, Malik Alawi96,97, Monique Albert98, Kenneth Aldape99,100, Ludmil B. Alexandrov49,101,102, Adrian Ally30, Kathryn Alsop103, Eva G. Alvarez104,105,106, Fernanda Amary107, Samirkumar B. Amin108,109,110, Brice Aminou76, Ole Ammerpohl111,112, Matthew J. Anderson113, Yeng Ang114, Davide Antonello115, Pavana Anur22, Samuel Aparicio116, Elizabeth L. Appelbaum1,117, Yasuhito Arai118, Axel Aretz119, Koji Arihiro93, Shun-ichi Ariizumi120, Joshua Armenia121, Laurent Arnould122, Sylvia Asa123,124, Yassen Assenov125, Gurnit Atwal6,126,127, Sietse Aukema112,128, J. Todd Auman129, Miriam R. Aure130, Philip Awadalla6,126, Marta Aymerich131, Gary D. Bader126, Adrian Baez-Ortega132, Matthew H. Bailey1,2,3, Peter J. Bailey133, Miruna Balasundaram30, Saianand Balu134, Pratiti Bandopadhayay8,135,136, Rosamonde E. Banks137, Stefano Barbi138, Andrew P. Barbour139,140, Jonathan Barenboim6, Jill Barnholtz-Sloan141,142, Hugh Barr143, Elisabet Barrera59, John Bartlett98,144, Javier Bartolome57, Claudio Bassi115, Oliver F. Bathe145,146, Daniel Baumhoer147, Prashant Bavi148, Stephen B. Baylin149,150, Wojciech Bazant59, Duncan Beardsmore151, Timothy A. Beck152,153, Sam Behjati49, Andreas Behren154, Beifang Niu35, Cindy Bell155, Sergi Beltran52,61, Christopher Benz156, Andrew Berchuck157, Anke K. Bergmann158, Erik N. Bergstrom101,102, Benjamin P. Berman159,160,161, Daniel M. Berney162, Stephan H. Bernhart163,164,165, Rameen Beroukhim8,14,82, Mario Berrios166, Samantha Bersani167, Johanna Bertl73,168, Miguel Betancourt169, Vinayak Bhandari6,44, Shriram G. Bhosle49, Andrew V. Biankin133,170,171,172, Matthias Bieg42,43, Darell Bigner173, Hans Binder163,164, Ewan Birney59, Michael Birrer72, Nidhan K. Biswas174, Bodil Bjerkehagen147,175, Tom Bodenheimer134, Lori Boice176, Giada Bonizzato177, Johann S. De Bono178, Arnoud Boot179,180, Moiz S. Bootwalla166, Ake Borg181, Arndt Borkhardt182, Keith A. Boroevich183,184, Ivan Borozan6, Christoph Borst185, Marcus Bosenberg186, Mattia Bosio52,53,57, Jacqueline Boultwood187, Guillaume Bourque188,189, Paul C. Boutros6,44,45,46, G. Steven Bova190, David T. Bowen49,191, Reanne Bowlby30, David D. L. Bowtell103, Sandrine Boyault192, Rich Boyce59, Jeffrey Boyd193, Alvis Brazma59, Paul Brennan194, Daniel S. Brewer195,196, Arie B. Brinkman197, Robert G. Bristow44,198,199,200,201, Russell R. Broaddus99, Jane E. Brock202, Malcolm Brock203, Annegien Broeks204, Angela N. Brooks8,24,37,82, Denise Brooks30, Benedikt Brors67,205,206, Søren Brunak207,208, Timothy J. C. Bruxner113,209, Alicia L. Bruzos104,105,106, Alex Buchanan9, Ivo Buchhalter43,47,48, Christiane Buchholz210, Susan Bullman8,82, Hazel Burke211, Birgit Burkhardt212, Kathleen H. Burns213,214, John Busanovich8,215, Carlos D. Bustamante216,217, Adam P. Butler49, Atul J. Butte218, Niall J. Byrne76, Anne-Lise Børresen-Dale130,219, Samantha J. Caesar-Johnson220, Andy Cafferkey59, Declan Cahill221, Claudia Calabrese59,60, Carlos Caldas222,223, Fabien Calvo224, Niedzica Camacho178, Peter J. Campbell49,225, Elias Campo226,227, Cinzia Cantù177, Shaolong Cao21, Thomas E. Carey228, Joana Carlevaro-Fita229,230,231, Rebecca Carlsen30, Ivana Cataldo167,177, Mario Cazzola232, Jonathan Cebon154, Robert Cerfolio233, Dianne E. Chadwick234, Dimple Chakravarty235, Don Chalmers236, Calvin Wing Yiu Chan47,237, Kin Chan238, Michelle Chan-Seng-Yue148, Vishal S. Chandan239, David K. Chang133,170, Stephen J. Chanock240, Lorraine A. Chantrill170,241, Aurélien Chateigner76,242, Nilanjan Chatterjee149,243, Kazuaki Chayama93, Hsiao-Wei Chen114,121, Jieming Chen218, Ken Chen50, Yiwen Chen21, Zhaohong Chen244, Andrew D. Cherniack8,82, Jeremy Chien245, Yoke-Eng Chiew246,247, Suet-Feung Chin222,223, Juok Cho8, Sunghoon Cho248, Jung Kyoon Choi249, Wan Choi250, Christine Chomienne251, Zechen Chong51, Su Pin Choo252, Angela Chou170,246, Angelika N. Christ113, Elizabeth L. Christie103, Eric Chuah30, Carrie Cibulskis8, Kristian Cibulskis8, Sara Cingarlini253, Peter Clapham49, Alexander Claviez254, Sean Cleary148,255, Nicole Cloonan256, Marek Cmero257,258,259, Colin C. Collins62, Ashton A. Connor255,260, Susanna L. Cooke133, Colin S. Cooper178,196,261, Leslie Cope149, Vincenzo Corbo138,177, Matthew G. Cordes1,262, Stephen M. Cordner263, Isidro Cortés-Ciriano264,265,266, Kyle Covington12,23, Prue A. Cowin267, Brian Craft24, David Craft8,268, Chad J. Creighton269, Yupeng Cun270, Erin Curley271, Ioana Cutcutache179,180, Karolina Czajka272, Bogdan Czerniak99,273, Rebecca A. Dagg274, Ludmila Danilova149, Maria Vittoria Davi275, Natalie R. Davidson276,277,278,279,280, Helen Davies49,281,282, Ian J. Davis283, Brandi N. Davis-Dusenbery284, Kevin J. Dawson49, Francisco M. De La Vega216,217,285, Ricardo De Paoli-Iseppi211, Timothy Defreitas8, Angelo P. Dei Tos286, Olivier Delaneau287,288,289, John A. Demchok220, Jonas Demeulemeester290,291, German M. Demidov52,53,74, Deniz Demircioğlu292,293, Nening M. Dennis221, Robert E. Denroche148, Stefan C. Dentro49,290,294, Nikita Desai76, Vikram Deshpande72, Amit G. Deshwar295, Christine Desmedt296,297, Jordi Deu-Pons298,299, Noreen Dhalla30, Neesha C. Dhani300, Priyanka Dhingra301,302, Rajiv Dhir303, Anthony DiBiase304, Klev Diamanti305, Li Ding1,2,3,20, Shuai Ding306, Huy Q. Dinh159, Luc Dirix307, HarshaVardhan Doddapaneni12, Nilgun Donmez62,78, Michelle T. Dow244, Ronny Drapkin308, Oliver Drechsel52,53, Ruben M. Drews223, Serge Serge49, Tim Dudderidge150,221, Ana Dueso-Barroso57, Andrew J. Dunford8, Michael Dunn309, Lewis Jonathan Dursi6,7, Fraser R. Duthie133,310, Ken Dutton-Regester311, Jenna Eagles272, Douglas F. Easton312,313, Stuart Edmonds314, Paul A. Edwards223,315, Sandra E. Edwards178, Rosalind A. Eeles178,221, Anna Ehinger316, Juergen Eils54,55, Roland Eils47,48,54,55, Adel El-Naggar99,273, Matthew Eldridge223, Kyle Ellrott9, Serap Erkek60, Georgia Escaramis53,317,318, Shadrielle M. G. Espiritu6, Xavier Estivill53,319, Dariush Etemadmoghadam103, Jorunn E. Eyfjord320, Bishoy M. Faltas280, Daiming Fan321, Yu Fan21, William C. Faquin72, Claudiu Farcas244, Matteo Fassan322, Aquila Fatima323, Francesco Favero324, Nodirjon Fayzullaev76, Ina Felau220, Sian Fereday103, Martin L. Ferguson325, Vincent Ferretti76,326, Lars Feuerbach205, Matthew A. Field327, J. Lynn Fink57,113, Gaetano Finocchiaro328, Cyril Fisher221, Matthew W. Fittall290, Anna Fitzgerald329, Rebecca C. Fitzgerald282, Adrienne M. Flanagan330, Neil E. Fleshner331, Paul Flicek59, John A. Foekens332, Kwun M. Fong333, Nuno A. Fonseca59,334, Christopher S. Foster335,336, Natalie S. Fox6, Michael Fraser6, Scott Frazer8, Milana Frenkel-Morgenstern337, William Friedman338, Joan Frigola298, Catrina C. Fronick1,262, Akihiro Fujimoto184, Masashi Fujita184, Masashi Fukayama339, Lucinda A. Fulton1 , Robert S. Fulton1,3,20, Mayuko Furuta184, P. Andrew Futreal340, Anja Füllgrabe59, Stacey B. Gabriel8, Steven Gallinger148,255,260, Carlo Gambacorti-Passerini341, Jianjiong Gao121, Shengjie Gao56, Levi Garraway82, Øystein Garred342, Erik Garrison49, Dale W. Garsed103, Nils Gehlenborg8,343, Josep L. l. Gelpi57,58, Joshy George110, Daniela S. Gerhard344, Clarissa Gerhauser345, Jeffrey E. Gershenwald346,347, Mark B. Gerstein5,18,19, Moritz Gerstung59,60, Gad Getz8,14,15,16, Mohammed Ghori49, Ronald Ghossein348, Nasra H. Giama349, Richard A. Gibbs12, Anthony J. Gill170,350, Pelvender Gill351, Dilip D. Giri348, Dominik Glodzik49, Vincent J. Gnanapragasam352,353, Maria Elisabeth Goebler354, Mary J. Goldman24, Carmen Gomez355, Santiago Gonzalez59,60, Abel Gonzalez-Perez298,299,356, Dmitry A. Gordenin357, James Gossage358, Kunihito Gotoh359, Ramaswamy Govindan3, Dorthe Grabau360, Janet S. Graham133,361, Robert C. Grant148,260, Anthony R. Green315, Eric Green27, Liliana Greger59, Nicola Grehan282, Sonia Grimaldi177, Sean M. Grimmond362, Robert L. Grossman363, Adam Grundhoff97,364, Gunes Gundem88, Qianyun Guo75, Manaswi Gupta8, Shailja Gupta365, Ivo G. Gut52,61, Marta Gut52,61, Jonathan Göke292,366, Gavin Ha8, Andrea Haake111, David Haan37, Siegfried Haas185, Kerstin Haase290, James E. Haber367, Nina Habermann60, Faraz Hach62,63, Syed Haider6, Natsuko Hama118, Freddie C. Hamdy351, Anne Hamilton267, Mark P. Hamilton368, Leng Han369, George B. Hanna370, Martin Hansmann371, Nicholas J. Haradhvala8,72, Olivier Harismendy102,372, Ivon Harliwong113, Arif O. Harmanci5,373, Eoghan Harrington374, Takanori Hasegawa375, David Haussler24,25, Steve Hawkins223, Shinya Hayami376, Shuto Hayashi375, D. Neil Hayes134,377,378, Stephen J. Hayes379,380, Nicholas K. Hayward211,311, Steven Hazell221, Yao He381, Allison P. Heath382, Simon C. Heath52,61, David Hedley300, Apurva M. Hegde38, David I. Heiman8, Michael C. Heinold47,48, Zachary Heins88, Lawrence E. Heisler152, Eva Hellstrom-Lindberg383, Mohamed Helmy384, Seong Gu Heo385, Austin J. Hepperla134, José María Heredia-Genestar386, Carl Herrmann47,48,387, Peter Hersey211, Julian M. Hess8,26, Holmfridur Hilmarsdottir320, Jonathan Hinton49, Satoshi Hirano388, Nobuyoshi Hiraoka389, Katherine A. Hoadley134,390, Asger Hobolth75,168, Ermin Hodzic78, Jessica I. Hoell182, Steve Hoffmann163,164,165,391, Oliver Hofmann392, Andrea Holbrook166, Aliaksei Z. Holik53, Michael A. Hollingsworth393, Oliver Holmes209,311, Robert A. Holt30, Chen Hong205,237, Eun Pyo Hong385, Jongwhi H. Hong394, Gerrit K. Hooijer395, Henrik Hornshøj73, Fumie Hosoda118, Yong Hou56,396, Volker Hovestadt397, William Howat352, Alan P. Hoyle134, Ralph H. Hruban149, Jianhong Hu12, Taobo Hu64, Xing Hua240, Kuan-lin Huang1,398, Mei Huang176, Mi Ni Huang179,180, Vincent Huang6, Yi Huang65,66, Wolfgang Huber60, Thomas J. Hudson272,399, Michael Hummel400, Jillian A. Hung246,247, David Huntsman401, Ted R. Hupp402, Jason Huse88, Matthew R. Huska403, Barbara Hutter43,67,68, Carolyn M. Hutter27, Daniel Hübschmann48,54,404,405,406, Christine A. Iacobuzio-Donahue348, Charles David Imbusch205, Marcin Imielinski407,408, Seiya Imoto375, William B. Isaacs409, Keren Isaev6,44, Shumpei Ishikawa410, Murat Iskar397, S. M. Ashiqul Islam244, Michael Ittmann411,412,413, Sinisa Ivkovic284, Jose M. G. Izarzugaza414, Jocelyne Jacquemier415, Valerie Jakrot211, Nigel B. Jamieson133,172,416, Gun Ho Jang148, Se Jin Jang417, Joy C. Jayaseelan12, Reyka Jayasinghe1 , Stuart R. Jefferys134, Karine Jegalian418, Jennifer L. Jennings419, Seung-Hyup Jeon250, Lara Jerman60,420, Yuan Ji421,422, Wei Jiao6, Peter A. Johansson311, Amber L. Johns170, Jeremy Johns272, Rory Johnson230,423, Todd A. Johnson183, Clemency Jolly290, Yann Joly424, Jon G. Jonasson320, Corbin D. Jones425, David R. Jones49, David T. W. Jones426,427, Nic Jones428, Steven J. M. Jones30, Jos Jonkers204, Young Seok Ju49,249, Hartmut Juhl429, Jongsun Jung69, Malene Juul73, Randi Istrup Juul73, Sissel Juul374, Natalie Jäger47, Rolf Kabbe47, Andre Kahles276,277,278,279,430, Abdullah Kahraman431,432,433, Vera B. Kaiser434, Hojabr Kakavand211, Sangeetha Kalimuthu148, Christof von Kalle405, Koo Jeong Kang91, Katalin Karaszi351, Beth Karlan435, Rosa Karlić436, Dennis Karsch437, Katayoon Kasaian29,30, Karin S. Kassahn113,438, Hitoshi Katai439, Mamoru Kato440, Hiroto Katoh410, Yoshiiku Kawakami93, Jonathan D. Kay117, Stephen H. Kazakoff209,311, Marat D. Kazanov441,442,443, Maria Keays59, Electron Kebebew444,445, Richard F. Kefford446, Manolis Kellis8,447, James G. Kench170,350,448, Catherine J. Kennedy246,247, Jules N. A. Kerssemakers47, David Khoo273, Vincent Khoo221, Narong Khuntikeo115,449, Ekta Khurana301,302,450,451, Helena Kilpinen117, Hark Kyun Kim452, Hyung-Lae Kim70, Hyung-Yong Kim415, Hyunghwan Kim250, Jaegil Kim8, Jihoon Kim453, Jong K. Kim454, Youngwook Kim455,456, Tari A. King457,458,459, Wolfram Klapper128, Kortine Kleinheinz47,48, Leszek J. Klimczak460, Stian Knappskog49,461, Michael Kneba437, Bartha M. Knoppers424, Youngil Koh462,463, Jan Komorowski305,464, Daisuke Komura410, Mitsuhiro Komura375, Gu Kong415, Marcel Kool426,465, Jan O. Korbel59,60, Viktoriya Korchina12, Andrey Korshunov465, Michael Koscher465, Roelof Koster466, Zsofia Kote-Jarai178, Antonios Koures244, Milena Kovacevic284, Barbara Kremeyer49, Helene Kretzmer164,165, Markus Kreuz467, Savitri Krishnamurthy99,468, Dieter Kube469, Kiran Kumar8, Pardeep Kumar221, Sushant Kumar5,19, Yogesh Kumar64, Ritika Kundra114,121, Kirsten Kübler8,14,72, Ralf Küppers470, Jesper Lagergren383,471, Phillip H. Lai166, Peter W. Laird472, Sunil R. Lakhani473, Christopher M. Lalansingh6, Emilie Lalonde6, Fabien C. Lamaze6, Adam Lambert351, Eric Lander8, Pablo Landgraf474,475, Luca Landoni115, Anita Langerød130, Andrés Lanzós230,231,423, Denis Larsimont476, Erik Larsson477, Mark Lathrop189, Loretta M. S. Lau478, Chris Lawerenz55, Rita T. Lawlor177, Michael S. Lawrence8,72,183, Alexander J. Lazar99,108, Xuan Le479, Darlene Lee30, Donghoon Lee5, Eunjung Alice Lee480, Hee Jin Lee417, Jake June-Koo Lee264,266, Jeong-Yeon Lee481, Juhee Lee482, Ming Ta Michael Lee340, Henry Lee-Six49, Kjong-Van Lehmann276,277,278,279,430, Hans Lehrach483, Dido Lenze400, Conrad R. Leonard209,311, Daniel A. Leongamornlert49,178, Ignaty Leshchiner8, Louis Letourneau484, Ivica Letunic71, Douglas A. Levine88,485, Lora Lewis12, Tim Ley486, Chang Li56,396, Constance H. Li6,44, Haiyan Irene Li30, Jun Li21, Lin Li56, Shantao Li5, Siliang Li56,396, Xiaobo Li56,396, Xiaotong Li5, Xinyue Li56, Yilong Li49, Han Liang21, Sheng-Ben Liang234, Peter Lichter68,397, Pei Lin8, Ziao Lin8,487, W. M. Linehan488, Ole Christian Lingjærde489, Dongbing Liu56,396, Eric Minwei Liu88,301,302, Fei-Fei Liu201,490, Fenglin Liu381,491, Jia Liu492, Xingmin Liu56,396, Julie Livingstone6, Dimitri Livitz8, Naomi Livni221, Lucas Lochovsky5,19,110, Markus Loeffler467, Georgina V. Long211, Armando Lopez-Guillermo493, Shaoke Lou5,19, David N. Louis72, Laurence B. Lovat117, Yiling Lu38, Yong-Jie Lu162,494, Youyong Lu495,496,497, Claudio Luchini167, Ilinca Lungu144,148, Xuemei Luo152, Hayley J. Luxton117, Andy G. Lynch223,315,498, Lisa Lype36, Cristina López111,112, Carlos López-Otín499, Eric Z. Ma64, Yussanne Ma30, Gaetan MacGrogan500, Shona MacRae501, Geoff Macintyre223, Tobias Madsen73, Kazuhiro Maejima184, Andrea Mafficini177, Dennis T. Maglinte166,502, Arindam Maitra174, Partha P. Majumder174, Luca Malcovati232, Salem Malikic62,78, Giuseppe Malleo115, Graham J. Mann211,246,503, Luisa Mantovani-Löffler504, Kathleen Marchal505,506, Giovanni Marchegiani115, Elaine R. Mardis1,193,507, Adam A. Margolin31, Maximillian G. Marin37, Florian Markowetz223,315, Julia Markowski403, Jeffrey Marks508, Tomas Marques-Bonet61,81,386,509, Marco A. Marra30, Luke Marsden351, John W. M. Martens332, Sancha Martin49,510, Jose I. Martin-Subero81,511, Iñigo Martincorena49, Alexander Martinez-Fundichely301,302,451 Yosef E. Maruvka8,26,72, R. Jay Mashl1,2, Charlie E. Massie223, Thomas J. Matthew37, Lucy Matthews178, Erik Mayer221,512, Simon Mayes513, Michael Mayo30, Faridah Mbabaali272, Karen McCune514, Ultan McDermott49, Patrick D. McGillivray19, Michael D. McLellan1,3,20, John D. McPherson148,272,515, John R. McPherson179,180, Treasa A. McPherson260, Samuel R. Meier8, Alice Meng516, Shaowu Meng134, Andrew Menzies49, Neil D. Merrett115,517, Sue Merson178, Matthew Meyerson8,14,82, William U. Meyerson4,5, Piotr A. Mieczkowski518, George L. Mihaiescu76, Sanja Mijalkovic284, Ana Mijalkovic Mijalkovic-Lazic284, Tom Mikkelsen519, Michele Milella253, Linda Mileshkin103, Christopher A. Miller1 , David K. Miller113,170, Jessica K. Miller272, Gordon B. Mills33,34, Ana Milovanovic57, Sarah Minner520, Marco Miotto115, Gisela Mir Arnau267, Lisa Mirabello240, Chris Mitchell103, Thomas J. Mitchell49,315,352, Satoru Miyano375, Naoki Miyoshi375, Shinichi Mizuno521, Fruzsina Molnár-Gábor522, Malcolm J. Moore300, Richard A. Moore30, Sandro Morganella49, Quaid D. Morris127,490, Carl Morrison523,524, Lisle E. Mose134, Catherine D. Moser349, Ferran Muiños298,299, Loris Mularoni298,299, Andrew J. Mungall30, Karen Mungall30, Elizabeth A. Musgrove133, Ville Mustonen525,526,527, David Mutch528, Francesc Muyas52,53,74, Donna M. Muzny12, Alfonso Muñoz59, Jerome Myers529, Ola Myklebost461, Peter Möller530, Genta Nagae89, Adnan M. Nagrial170, Hardeep K. Nahal-Bose76, Hitoshi Nakagama531, Hidewaki Nakagawa184, Hiromi Nakamura118, Toru Nakamura388, Kaoru Nakano184, Tannistha Nandi532, Jyoti Nangalia49, Mia Nastic284, Arcadi Navarro61,81,386, Fabio C. P. Navarro19, David E. Neal223,352, Gerd Nettekoven533, Felicity Newell209,311, Steven J. Newhouse59, Yulia Newton37, Alvin Wei Tian Ng534, Anthony Ng535, Jonathan Nicholson49, David Nicol221, Yongzhan Nie321,536, G. Petur Nielsen72, Morten Muhlig Nielsen73, Serena Nik-Zainal49,281,282,537, Michael S. Noble8, Katia Nones209,311, Paul A. Northcott538, Faiyaz Notta148,539, Brian D. O’Connor76,540, Peter O’Donnell541, Maria O’Donovan282, Sarah O’Meara49, Brian Patrick O’Neill542, J. Robert O’Neill543, David Ocana59, Angelica Ochoa88, Layla Oesper544, Christopher Ogden221, Hideki Ohdan93, Kazuhiro Ohi375, Lucila Ohno-Machado244, Karin A. Oien523,545, Akinyemi I. Ojesina546,547,548, Hidenori Ojima549, Takuji Okusaka550, Larsson Omberg551, Choon Kiat Ong552, Stephan Ossowski52,53,74, German Ott553, B. F. Francis Ouellette76,554, Christine P’ng6, Marta Paczkowska6, Salvatore Paiella115, Chawalit Pairojkul523, Marina Pajic170, Qiang Pan-Hammarström56,555, Elli Papaemmanuil49, Irene Papatheodorou59, Nagarajan Paramasivam43,47, Ji Wan Park385, Joong-Won Park556, Keunchil Park557,558, Kiejung Park559, Peter J. Park264,266, Joel S. Parker518, Simon L. Parsons124, Harvey Pass560, Danielle Pasternack272, Alessandro Pastore276, Ann-Marie Patch209,311, Iris Pauporté251, Antonio Pea115, John V. Pearson209,311, Chandra Sekhar Pedamallu8,14,82, Jakob Skou Pedersen73,75, Paolo Pederzoli115, Martin Peifer270, Nathan A. Pennell561, Charles M. Perou129,518, Marc D. Perry76,77, Gloria M. Petersen562, Myron Peto22, Nicholas Petrelli563, Robert Petryszak59, Stefan M. Pfister426,465,564, Mark Phillips424, Oriol Pich298,299, Hilda A. Pickett478, Todd D. Pihl565, Nischalan Pillay566, Sarah Pinder567, Mark Pinese170, Andreia V. Pinho568, Esa Pitkänen60, Xavier Pivot569, Elena Piñeiro-Yáñez95, Laura Planko533, Christoph Plass345, Paz Polak8,14,15, Tirso Pons570, Irinel Popescu571, Olga Potapova572, Aparna Prasad52, Shaun R. Preston573, Manuel Prinz47, Antonia L. Pritchard311, Stephenie D. Prokopec6, Elena Provenzano574, Xose S. Puente499, Sonia Puig176, Montserrat Puiggròs57, Sergio Pulido-Tamayo505,506, Gulietta M. Pupo246, Colin A. Purdie575, Michael C. Quinn209,311, Raquel Rabionet52,53,576, Janet S. Rader577, Bernhard Radlwimmer397, Petar Radovic284, Benjamin Raeder60, Keiran M. Raine49, Manasa Ramakrishna49, Kamna Ramakrishnan49, Suresh Ramalingam578, Benjamin J. Raphael579, W. Kimryn Rathmell580, Tobias Rausch60, Guido Reifenberger475, Jüri Reimand6,44, Jorge Reis-Filho348, Victor Reuter348, Iker Reyes-Salazar298, Matthew A. Reyna579, Sheila M. Reynolds36, Esther Rheinbay8,14,72, Yasser Riazalhosseini189, Andrea L. Richardson323, Julia Richter111,128, Matthew Ringel581, Markus Ringnér181, Yasushi Rino582, Karsten Rippe405, Jeffrey Roach583, Lewis R. Roberts349, Nicola D. Roberts49, Steven A. Roberts584, A. Gordon Robertson30, Alan J. Robertson113, Javier Bartolomé Rodriguez57, Bernardo Rodriguez-Martin104,105,106, F. Germán Rodríguez-González83,332, Michael H. A. Roehrl44,123,148,234,585,586, Marius Rohde587, Hirofumi Rokutan440, Gilles Romieu588, Ilse Rooman170, Tom Roques262, Daniel Rosebrock8, Mara Rosenberg8,72, Philip C. Rosenstiel589, Andreas Rosenwald590, Edward W. Rowe221,591, Romina Royo57, Steven G. Rozen179,180,592, Yulia Rubanova17,127, Mark A. Rubin423,593,594,595,596, Carlota Rubio-Perez298,299,597, Vasilisa A. Rudneva60, Borislav C. Rusev177, Andrea Ruzzenente598, Gunnar Rätsch276,277,278,279,280,430, Radhakrishnan Sabarinathan298,299,599, Veronica Y. Sabelnykova6, Sara Sadeghi30, S. Cenk Sahinalp62,78,79, Natalie Saini357, Mihoko Saito-Adachi440, Gordon Saksena8, Adriana Salcedo6, Roberto Salgado600, Leonidas Salichos5,19, Richard Sallari8, Charles Saller601, Roberto Salvia115, Michelle Sam272, Jaswinder S. Samra115,602, Francisco Sanchez-Vega114,121, Chris Sander276,603,604, Grant Sanders134, Rajiv Sarin605, Iman Sarrafi62,78, Aya Sasaki-Oku184, Torill Sauer489, Guido Sauter520, Robyn P. M. Saw211, Maria Scardoni167, Christopher J. Scarlett170,606, Aldo Scarpa177, Ghislaine Scelo194, Dirk Schadendorf68,607, Jacqueline E. Schein30, Markus B. Schilhabel589, Matthias Schlesner47,80, Thorsten Schlomm84,608, Heather K. Schmidt1 , Sarah-Jane Schramm246, Stefan Schreiber609, Nikolaus Schultz121, Steven E. Schumacher8,323, Roland F. Schwarz59,403,405,610, Richard A. Scolyer211,448,602, David Scott428, Ralph Scully611, Raja Seethala612, Ayellet V. Segre8,613, Iris Selander260, Colin A. Semple434, Yasin Senbabaoglu276, Subhajit Sengupta614, Elisabetta Sereni115, Stefano Serra585, Dennis C. Sgroi72, Mark Shackleton103, Nimish C. Shah352, Sagedeh Shahabi234, Catherine A. Shang329, Ping Shang211, Ofer Shapira8,323, Troy Shelton271, Ciyue Shen603,604, Hui Shen615, Rebecca Shepherd49, Ruian Shi490, Yan Shi134, Yu-Jia Shiah6, Tatsuhiro Shibata118,616, Juliann Shih8,82, Eigo Shimizu375, Kiyo Shimizu617, Seung Jun Shin618, Yuichi Shiraishi375, Tal Shmaya285, Ilya Shmulevich36, Solomon I. Shorser6, Charles Short59, Raunak Shrestha62, Suyash S. Shringarpure217, Craig Shriver619, Shimin Shuai6,126, Nikos Sidiropoulos83, Reiner Siebert112,620, Anieta M. Sieuwerts332, Lina Sieverling205,237, Sabina Signoretti202,621, Katarzyna O. Sikora177, Michele Simbolo138, Ronald Simon520, Janae V. Simons134, Jared T. Simpson6,17, Peter T. Simpson473, Samuel Singer115,458, Nasa Sinnott-Armstrong8,217, Payal Sipahimalani30, Tara J. Skelly390, Marcel Smid332, Jaclyn Smith622, Karen Smith-McCune514, Nicholas D. Socci276, Heidi J. Sofia27, Matthew G. Soloway134, Lei Song240, Anil K. Sood623,624,625, Sharmila Sothi626, Christos Sotiriou244, Cameron M. Soulette37, Paul N. Span627, Paul T. Spellman22, Nicola Sperandio177, Andrew J. Spillane211, Oliver Spiro8, Jonathan Spring628, Johan Staaf181, Peter F. Stadler163,164,165, Peter Staib629, Stefan G. Stark277,279,618,630, Lucy Stebbings49, Ólafur Andri Stefánsson631, Oliver Stegle59,60,632, Lincoln D. Stein6,126, Alasdair Stenhouse633, Chip Stewart8, Stephan Stilgenbauer634, Miranda D. Stobbe52,61, Michael R. Stratton49, Jonathan R. Stretch211, Adam J. Struck31, Joshua M. Stuart24,37, Henk G. Stunnenberg396,635, Hong Su56,396, Xiaoping Su99, Ren X. Sun6, Stephanie Sungalee60, Hana Susak52,53, Akihiro Suzuki89,636, Fred Sweep637, Monika Szczepanowski128, Holger Sültmann67,638, Takashi Yugawa617, Angela Tam30, David Tamborero298,299, Benita Kiat Tee Tan639, Donghui Tan518, Patrick Tan180,532,592,640, Hiroko Tanaka375, Hirokazu Taniguchi616, Tomas J. Tanskanen641, Maxime Tarabichi49,290, Roy Tarnuzzer220, Patrick Tarpey642, Morgan L. Taschuk152, Kenji Tatsuno89, Simon Tavaré223,643, Darrin F. Taylor113, Amaro Taylor-Weiner8, Jon W. Teague49, Bin Tean Teh180,592,640,644,645, Varsha Tembe246, Javier Temes104,105, Kevin Thai76, Sarah P. Thayer393, Nina Thiessen30, Gilles Thomas646, Sarah Thomas221, Alan Thompson221, Alastair M. Thompson633, John F. Thompson211, R. Houston Thompson647, Heather Thorne103, Leigh B. Thorne176, Adrian Thorogood424, Grace Tiao8, Nebojsa Tijanic284, Lee E. Timms272, Roberto Tirabosco648, Marta Tojo106, Stefania Tommasi649, Christopher W. Toon170, Umut H. Toprak48,650, David Torrents57,81, Giampaolo Tortora651,652, Jörg Tost653, Yasushi Totoki118, David Townend654, Nadia Traficante103, Isabelle Treilleux655,656, Jean-Rémi Trotta61, Lorenz H. P. Trümper469, Ming Tsao124,539, Tatsuhiko Tsunoda183,657,658,659, Jose M. C. Tubio104,105,106, Olga Tucker660, Richard Turkington661, Daniel J. Turner513, Andrew Tutt323, Masaki Ueno376, Naoto T. Ueno662, Christopher Umbricht151,213,663, Husen M. Umer305,664, Timothy J. Underwood665, Lara Urban59,60, Tomoko Urushidate616, Tetsuo Ushiku339, Liis Uusküla-Reimand666,667, Alfonso Valencia57,81, David J. Van Den Berg166, Steven Van Laere307, Peter Van Loo290,291, Erwin G. Van Meir668, Gert G. Van den Eynden307, Theodorus Van der Kwast123, Naveen Vasudev137, Miguel Vazquez57,669, Ravikiran Vedururu267, Umadevi Veluvolu518, Shankar Vembu490,670, Lieven P. C. Verbeke506,671, Peter Vermeulen307, Clare Verrill351,672, Alain Viari177, David Vicente57, Caterina Vicentini177, K. Vijay Raghavan365, Juris Viksna673, Ricardo E. Vilain674, Izar Villasante57, Anne Vincent-Salomon635, Tapio Visakorpi190, Douglas Voet8, Paresh Vyas311,351, Ignacio Vázquez-García49,86,675,676, Nick M. Waddell209, Nicola Waddell209,311, Claes Wadelius677, Lina Wadi6, Rabea Wagener111,112, Jeremiah A. Wala8,14,82, Jian Wang56, Jiayin Wang1,40,66, Linghua Wang12, Qi Wang465, Wenyi Wang21, Yumeng Wang21, Zhining Wang220, Paul M. Waring523, Hans-Jörg Warnatz483, Jonathan Warrell5,19, Anne Y. Warren352,678, Sebastian M. Waszak60, David C. Wedge49,294,679, Dieter Weichenhan345, Paul Weinberger680, John N. Weinstein38, Joachim Weischenfeldt60,83,84, Daniel J. Weisenberger166, Ian Welch681, Michael C. Wendl1,10,11, Johannes Werner47,85, Justin P. Whalley61,682, David A. Wheeler12,13, Hayley C. Whitaker117, Dennis Wigle683, Matthew D. Wilkerson518, Ashley Williams244, James S. Wilmott211, Gavin W. Wilson6,148, Julie M. Wilson148, Richard K. Wilson1,684, Boris Winterhoff685, Jeffrey A. Wintersinger17,127,384, Maciej Wiznerowicz686,687, Stephan Wolf688, Bernice H. Wong689, Tina Wong1,30, Winghing Wong690, Youngchoon Woo250, Scott Wood209,311, Bradly G. Wouters44, Adam J. Wright6, Derek W. Wright133,691, Mark H. Wright217, Chin-Lee Wu72, Dai-Ying Wu285, Guanming Wu692, Jianmin Wu170, Kui Wu56,396, Yang Wu179,180, Zhenggang Wu64, Liu Xi12, Tian Xia693, Qian Xiang76, Xiao Xiao66, Rui Xing497, Heng Xiong56,396, Qinying Xu209,311, Yanxun Xu694, Hong Xue64, Shinichi Yachida118,695, Sergei Yakneen60, Rui Yamaguchi375, Takafumi N. Yamaguchi6, Masakazu Yamamoto120, Shogo Yamamoto89, Hiroki Yamaue376, Fan Yang490, Huanming Yang56, Jean Y. Yang696, Liming Yang220, Lixing Yang697, Shanlin Yang306, Tsun-Po Yang270, Yang Yang369, Xiaotong Yao408,698, Marie-Laure Yaspo483, Lucy Yates49, Christina Yau156, Chen Ye56,396, Kai Ye40,41, Venkata D. Yellapantula20,86, Christopher J. Yoon249, Sung-Soo Yoon463, Fouad Yousif6, Jun Yu699, Kaixian Yu700, Willie Yu701, Yingyan Yu702, Ke Yuan223,510,703, Yuan Yuan21, Denis Yuen6, Takashi Yugawa617, Christina K. Yung76, Olga Zaikova704, Jorge Zamora49,104,105,106, Marc Zapatka397, Jean C. Zenklusen220, Thorsten Zenz67, Nikolajs Zeps705,706, Cheng-Zhong Zhang8,707, Fan Zhang381, Hailei Zhang8, Hongwei Zhang494, Hongxin Zhang121, Jiashan Zhang220, Jing Zhang5, Junjun Zhang76, Xiuqing Zhang56, Xuanping Zhang66,369, Yan Zhang5,708,709, Zemin Zhang381,710, Zhongming Zhao711, Liangtao Zheng381, Xiuqing Zheng381, Wanding Zhou615, Yong Zhou56, Bin Zhu240, Hongtu Zhu700,712, Jingchun Zhu24, Shida Zhu56,396, Lihua Zou713, Xueqing Zou49, Anna deFazio246,247,714, Nicholas van As221, Carolien H. M. van Deurzen715, Marc J. van de Vijver523, L. van’t Veer716 & Christian von Mering433,717, The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and International Cancer Genome Consortium (ICGC) curated consensus somatic mutation calls using whole exome sequencing (WES) and whole genome sequencing (WGS), respectively. Here, as part of the ICGC/TCGA Pan-Cancer Analysis of Whole Genomes (PCAWG) Consortium, which aggregated whole genome sequencing data from 2,658 cancers across 38 tumour types, we compare WES and WGS side-by-side from 746 TCGA samples, finding that ~80% of mutations overlap in covered exonic regions. We estimate that low variant allele fraction (VAF < 15%) and clonal heterogeneity contribute up to 68% of private WGS mutations and 71% of private WES mutations. We observe that ~30% of private WGS mutations trace to mutations identified by a single variant caller in WES consensus efforts. WGS captures both ~50% more variation in exonic regions and un-observed mutations in loci with variable GC-content. Together, our analysis highlights technological divergences between two reproducible somatic variant detection efforts.

Genetic association mapping produces statistical links between phenotypes and genomic regions, but identifying causal variants remains difficult. Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) can help by providing complete knowledge of all genetic variants, but it is financially prohibitive for well-powered GWAS studies. We performed mapping of expression quantitative trait loci (eQTLs) with WGS and RNA-seq, and found that lead eQTL variants called with WGS were more likely to be causal. Through simulations, we derived properties of causal variants and used them to develop a method for identifying likely causal SNPs. We estimated that 25-70% of causal variants were located in open-chromatin regions, depending on the tissue and experiment. Finally, we identified a set of high-confidence causal variants and showed that these were more enriched in GWAS associations than other eQTLs. Of those, we found 65 associations with GWAS traits and provide examples in which genes implicated by expression are functionally validated as being relevant for complex traits.

The impact of inherited genetic variation on gene expression in humans is well-established. The majority of known expression quantitative trait loci (eQTLs) impact expression of local genes (cis-eQTLs). More research is needed to identify effects of genetic variation on distant genes (trans-eQTLs) and understand their biological mechanisms. One common trans-eQTLs mechanism is “mediation” by a local (cis) transcript. Thus, mediation analysis can be applied to genome-wide SNP and expression data in order to identify transcripts that are “cis-mediators” of trans-eQTLs, including those “cis-hubs” involved in regulation of many trans-genes. Identifying such mediators helps us understand regulatory networks and suggests biological mechanisms underlying trans-eQTLs, both of which are relevant for understanding susceptibility to complex diseases. The multitissue expression data from the Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx) program provides a unique opportunity to study cis-mediation across human tissue types. However, the presence of complex hidden confounding effects in biological systems can make mediation analyses challenging and prone to confounding bias, particularly when conducted among diverse samples. To address this problem, we propose a new method: Genomic Mediation analysis with Adaptive Confounding adjustment (GMAC). It enables the search of a very large pool of variables, and adaptively selects potential confounding variables for each mediation test. Analyses of simulated data and GTEx data demonstrate that the adaptive selection of confounders by GMAC improves the power and precision of mediation analysis. Application of GMAC to GTEx data provides new insights into the observed patterns of cis-hubs and trans-eQTL regulation across tissue types.