Search

Thrombosis may be included in the profile of side effects associated with CDK4/6 inhibitors. Its significance might be greater than reported in randomized clinical trials. To investigate this, a retrospective, multicenter study was conducted. The primary objective was to calculate the incidence of thrombosis associated with CDK4/6 inhibitors. Secondary objectives included examining the impact of thrombosis on survival and identifying predictor variables for the development of venous thromboembolism (VTE) or arterial thrombosis (AT). A total of 986 patients were recruited. The incidence of VTE/AT associated with CDK4/6 inhibitor treatment during the follow-up period was 5.48 %. Survival analysis did not indicate that the development of VTE/AT during CDK4/6 inhibitor treatment significantly impacted patient survival (p = 0.133). In our analysis, two variables were found to be statistically significant (p < 0.05) as predictors of VTE/AT in breast cancer patients receiving CDK4/6 inhibitor therapy. These variables were the presence of central nervous system (CNS) metastasis with an odds ratio (OR) of 3.68 (95 % CI 1.18 - 11.49) and the use of abemaciclib with an OR of 2.3 (95 % CI 1.16 - 4.57)., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare no conflicts of interest related to this article., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Background:  Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a common complication in cancer patients. Much of its morbidity stems from the development of fatal pulmonary embolisms (PE). Little is known about the factors involved in clot stability, with angiogenesis possibly being implicated., Methods:  The database is from the TESEO prospective registry that recruits cancer patients with VTE from 41 Spanish hospitals. Independent validation was conducted in a cohort from the Caravaggio trial. The objective is to evaluate the association between exposure to antiangiogenic therapies and the PE/VTE proportion in oncological patients., Results:  In total, 1,536 subjects were evaluated; 58.4% ( n  = 894) had a PE and 7% ( n  = 108) received antiangiogenic therapy (bevacizumab in 75%). The PE/VTE proportion among antiangiogenic-treated individuals was 77/108 (71.3%) versus 817/1,428 (57.2%) among those receiving other alternative therapies ( p  = 0.004). The effect of the antiangiogenics on the PE/VTE proportion held up across all subgroups except for active smokers or those with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Exposure to antiangiogenics was associated with increased PEs, odds ratio (OR) 2.27 (95% CI, 1.42-3.63). In the Caravaggio trial, PE was present in 67% of the individuals treated with antiangiogenics, 50% of those who received chemotherapy without antiangiogenic treatment, and 60% without active therapy ( p  = 0.0016)., Conclusion:  Antiangiogenics are associated with increased proportion of PE in oncological patients with VTE. If an effect on clot stability is confirmed, the concept of thrombotic risk in cancer patients should be reconsidered in qualitative terms., Competing Interests: None declared., (The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).)